Paid Content for Publishing Houses

1
Paid Content und Paid Services 2011! VDZ Akademie How do you evaluate the paid content market (publishing market) from an international and national perspective and which potential do you see? Given our long-standing global coverage we are very familiar with look- ing at the paid content market from a local, regional and international perspective. In this context we are very optimistic about the future of paid content while recognising that the market will develop at different speeds and in different ways country by country and region by region. Technology adoption is a big driver of this with huge potential for mo- bile paid content consumption in developing markets, alongside tablet- based consumption in more developed markets. How does “e Economist” face the challenges of paid content and with which strategies? We have a multifaceted approach to paid content. Alongside the news- stand and subscription versions of “e Economist” newspaper we have a metered paywall on Economist.com that provides for some free access to our content while encouraging the heaviest users of the site to sub- scribe. We also provide some limited free content within our iPhone and iPad app while charging for unlimited access to them. It is fundamental to us however that subscribers to “The Economist” newspaper enjoy access to all our content regardless of platform. What are the greatest challenges for publishing houses regarding paid content? Maintaining a balanced approach is the greatest challenge. It is relatively easy to become entrenched in an extreme position. is however is un- likely to be where your customers want and need you to be. Providing a range of options that address different customer and business needs is more likely to be sustainable. From your perspective, which paid business models will work in the future for magazines and which won’t? A wide range of paid business models will work across the different seg- ments of the media landscape from niche to mainstream. Indeed there will undoubtedly be some to come in the future that we have yet to con- ceive of. Nevertheless, of the opportunities that currently exist, I am less negative on micro-pay- ments than most. While I accept that this busi- ness model is unlikely to go mainstream any time soon I think is still has potential in some areas, providing the technology continues to evolve. Why is it so difficult for publishing houses to adapt themselves from free to paid content? Very good question. I think it is partly a cul- tural issue and partly an operational issue. Grappling with complex pricing issues can raise cultural issues around commerciality versus creativity while the systems required to support some of the more sophisticated paid content models are challenging to deploy and maintain. What is your opinion regarding the paywall approach in comparison to the freemium approach? I think that the freemium approach is an important part of the paid con- tent landscape. It provides a degree of flexibility that appeals to patterns of modern consumption and something of an antidote to overwhelming choice. I don’t think however that paywall and freemium models are mu- tually exclusive. ey can and oſten should be part of the same overall pricing strategy. Mehr Informationen zu den Expertenforen der VDZ Akademie finden sie unter: www.vdz-akademie.de Das Interview führte Dr. Bastian Schwithal, Leiter Expertenforen der VDZ Akademie. We are very optimistic about the future of paid content Nick Blunden plädiert für differenzierte Paid-Content-Modelle www.vdz.de 25 Nick Blunden, „e Economist Online“, spricht auf dem Expertenforum „Paid Content und Paid Services 2011!“ am 11. Mai in Hamburg.

description

Nick Blunden, Managing Director & Publisher of The Economist online about the the challenges for publishing houses regarding paid content and explains which paid business models will work for magazines and which won’t.

Transcript of Paid Content for Publishing Houses

Paid Content und Paid Services 2011! VDZ Akademie

How do you evaluate the paid content market (publishing market) froman international and national perspective and which potential do you see? Given our long-standing global coverage we are very familiar with look -ing at the paid content market from a local, regional and internationalperspective. In this context we are very optimistic about the future ofpaid content while recognising that the market will develop at differentspeeds and in different ways country by country and region by region.Technology adoption is a big driver of this with huge potential for mo-bile paid content consumption in developing markets, alongside tablet-based consumption in more developed markets.

How does “The Economist” face the challenges of paid content and withwhich strategies? We have a multifaceted approach to paid content. Alongside the news-stand and subscription versions of “The Economist” newspaper we havea metered paywall on Economist.com that provides for some free accessto our content while encouraging the heaviest users of the site to sub-scribe. We also provide some limited free content within our iPhone andiPad app while charging for unlimited access to them. It is fundamentalto us however that subscribers to “The Economist” newspaper enjoy access to all our content regardless of platform.

What are the greatest challenges for publishing houses regarding paidcontent? Maintaining a balanced approach is the greatest challenge. It is relativelyeasy to become entrenched in an extreme position. This however is un-likely to be where your customers want and need you to be. Providing arange of options that address different customer and business needs ismore likely to be sustainable.

From your perspective, which paid business models will work in thefuture for magazines and which won’t? A wide range of paid business models will work across the different seg-ments of the media landscape from niche to mainstream. Indeed therewill undoubtedly be some to come in the future that we have yet to con-ceive of. Nevertheless, of the opportunities that currently exist, I am less

negative on micro-pay-ments than most. WhileI accept that this busi-ness model is unlikely togo mainstream any timesoon I think is still haspotential in some areas,providing the technol ogycontinues to evolve.

Why is it so difficult forpublishing houses toadapt themselves fromfree to paid content? Very good question. Ithink it is partly a cul -tural issue and partly anoperational issue.Grappling with complex pricing issues can raise cultural issues aroundcommerciality versus creativity while the systems required to supportsome of the more sophisticated paid content models are challenging todeploy and maintain.

What is your opinion regarding the paywall approach in comparisonto the freemium approach? I think that the freemium approach is an important part of the paid con-tent landscape. It provides a degree of flexibility that appeals to patternsof modern consumption and something of an antidote to overwhelmingchoice. I don’t think however that paywall and freemium models are mu-tually exclusive. They can and often should be part of the same overallpricing strategy.

Mehr Informationen zu den Expertenforen der VDZ Akademie findensie unter: www.vdz-akademie.deDas Interview führte Dr. Bastian Schwithal, Leiter Expertenforen derVDZ Akademie.

We are very optimistic aboutthe future of paid content Nick Blunden plädiert für differenzierte Paid-Content-Modelle

www.vdz.de 25

Nick Blunden, „The Economist Online“,spricht auf dem Expertenforum „PaidContent und Paid Services 2011!“ am11. Mai in Hamburg.