Page 1 APIIC CETPs Needs Assessment Study 1 International Conference on Solid Waste Management...

32
Page 1 APIIC CETPs Needs Assessment Study International Conference on Solid Waste Management Maloth Nanu, G.Durga Prasad, R. Hrishikesh Mahadev

Transcript of Page 1 APIIC CETPs Needs Assessment Study 1 International Conference on Solid Waste Management...

Page 1

APIIC CETPs Needs Assessment Study

International Conference on Solid Waste Management Maloth Nanu, G.Durga Prasad, R. Hrishikesh Mahadev

Page 2

» About APIIC-GIZ Cooperation

» About the Study

» Approach

» Industrial Zones of Andhra Pradesh

» Methodology

» Criteria for selecting Industrial Estates for CETP

» Decision Matrix Analysis

» Short-listing of Industrial estates for pre-feasibility studies

Contents

Page 319.04.23

About APIIC and GIZ Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Cooperation (APIIC)

incorporated on September 26, 1973 is the state owned organization vested with the responsibility of developing industrial parks and industrial infrastructure in Andhra Pradesh.

APIIC has so far developed over 300 industrial areas spreading over an extent of more than 150,000 acres

The Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH is an international cooperation enterprise for sustainable development, Company owned by the German Federal Government

It has now been working in India for over 50 years.

GIZ operates in 130 countries.

GIZ employs 17,000 staff worldwide

Page 4

Background of APIIC-GIZ Cooperation

In 2004, CPCB in cooperation GIZ, APIIC, and APPCB will work on “Planning and developing eco-industrial parks with technical support in Andhra Pradesh”

After pilot phase, MoU was extended with request from APIIC to 2012 under Advisory Services in Environment Management (ASEM)

Under the Indo-German Environment Partnership Programme, technical cooperation has been provided by GIZ to APIIC from 2012 - 2015.

4

Page 5

IntroductionWhat is a CETP?

Common Effluent Treatment Plant is a facility of treating effluents by means of a collective effort mainly for a cluster of small scale industrial units.

Purpose:

• Reduced treatment costs for individual units (‘economies of scale’)

• Centralised service. Individual industries can concentrate on their core business, while CETP operator provides service.

• Reduced need for technical expertise and trained personnel as fewer plants require fewer people.

• Optimal utilisation of space at a common facility than with several plants in several individual industries. ]

• Easy to monitor and regulate pollution control.

• Possibility for recycle/reuse of treated waste water and proper disposal.

Page 6

MoEF’s CETPs Scheme:

» Scope of CETP Scheme: Establishment of new CETPs in an industrial estate or a cluster of SSIs. Up-gradation / modernization proposal for CETPs of earlier financed

through the MoEF shall be considered for the one time funding.

» Assistance provided: Central assistance of 50% of the total project cost, with a ceiling of Rs 15

Crores for non-ZLD and Rs. 20 Crores for ZLDs. State gov. to provide 25 % of the total project cost. Project proponents to put in 25% out of which:

• 15% should be contribution for project proponent and remaining • 10% should be loan from banks / financial institutions

Page 719.04.23

ObjectiveThe objective of the study is to identify industrial parks of APIIC in Andhra Pradesh that need establishment of the Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs) on priority.  The specific objectives are: Collection of information regarding industrial parks of APIIC and

To understand the location of industrial parks and type of industrial activity.

Documentation of the collected information by developing a GIS based database, for the purpose of analysis and thematic presentation.

To develop and apply an appropriate methodology for rapid assessment of industrial parks for assessing CETP needs.

To identify the priority industrial parks of APIIC that need CETPs.

Page 8

Approach

Collection of Data from MIS

Screening of Industrial Estates based on defined

criteria

Questionnaire Survey for Zonal Managers

Discussion with ZM / ZO on the requirement of

CETP

Shortlisting Industrial Estate

Shortlisting Industrial Estate

Discussion with APIIC on the selected industrial

estate

Shortlisted Industrial estates for pre-feasibility

studies

Detailed Questionnaire survey with ZM / IALA/

member industries

Visit to Industrial Estates and collection of data from ZO and IALA for selected parks

Feedback from APPCB

Collection of data from APPCB

Shortlisting of Industries for feasibility studies

Inputs from the National Seminar

Page 9

CETPs in India

Page 10

IPs in Andhra PradeshAPIIC Zone No of Industrial Parks

CYBERABAD 16

JEEDIMETLA 24

KADAPPA 31

KAKINADA 25

KARIMNAGAR 14

KURNOOL 27

MOULA ALI 10

NELLORE 35

PATANCHERU 23

SHAMSHABAD 24

TIRUPATHI 28

VIJAYWADA 43

VISAKHAPATNAM 28

VISAKHAPATNAM (SPL) 15

WARANGAL 20

TOTAL 365

Page 11

IPs in Andhra Pradesh

Page 12

Criteria 1: Area of the Industrial Estate

Area of the Industrial Park Need for CETP

< 75 Acres Low

75 to 400 Acres Medium

400 to 750 Acres High

> 750 Acres Very High

Effluent Category Need for CETP

W4 Low

W3 Medium

W2 High

W1 Very High

Criteria 2: IP Categorization Based on Pollution Potential of Industries

Criteria for Shortlisting IPs Needing CETP

Page 13

Criteria 3: Water ConsumptionWastewater Generation Need for CETP

<1,000 KLD Low

1,000 – 2,000 KLD Medium

2,000 – 3,000 KLD High

> 3,000 KLD Very High

Criteria 5: Bio-degradability / toxicity of wasteBio-degradability Need for CETP

No Low

Yes Very High

Criteria for selecting IP for CETP

ZM List Need for CETP

No, not required Low

Yes, required Very High

Criteria 4: APIIC Zonal Managers Feedback

Page 1419.04.23

Industry Categorization

Page 1519.04.23

Area of Industrial Estates

Page 1619.04.23

IP Categorisation: Pollution Potential

Page 1719.04.23

IP Categorisation: Water Consumption

Page 1819.04.23

IP Categorisation: Needs Expressed by ZMs of APIIC

Page 1919.04.23

IP Categorisation: Biodegradability of Wastewater

Page 20

Elimination Process:IPs with industries of low pollution potential (only W4 category)IPs already having CETP, other IPs supported by the existing CETPs, IPs with CETP under consideration/construction Non operational IPs due to lack of industries and sick/closed industries

Shortlist -1 Elimination Process

Page 21

Nos.

Area

W1 to W3 >=75Very high

W1 to W3 >=50 and <75High

W1 to W3 >=25 and<50Medium

W1 to W3 <25 Low

>=750 AcresVery High Very High

1 Very High

1Very High

0Very High

17

>=400 and <750High

Very High1

Very High0

High5

High09

>=75 and <400Medium

Very High1

High0

High4

Medium55

<75Low Very High

0High

0Medium

0Very Low

184

Decision Matrix 1

Shortlist - 2 Based on Area and Pollution Potential

Low No:184

Medium No:55

High No: 18

Very High NO:21

Page 2219.04.23

Page 2319.04.23

Low No:184

Medium No:54

High No: 17

Very High No:23

Shortlist – 3 Based on DM I and Water requirement

wasteWater

Very high High Medium Low

> =3 MLD Very High

2,Very High

0Very High

0Very High

0

>=2 to <3 MLD Very High,

3Very High,

2High

0High

0

>=1 to <2 MLD Very High,

3High,

3High,

1Medium

0

< 1 MLDVery High

13High13

Medium54

Very Low184

Decision Matrix 2

Page 2419.04.23

Page 25

ZM List

Very high High Medium Low

ZM listVery High

Very High, 10

Very High, 4

High, 9

Medium, 5

ZM ListLow High,

13High,

13Medium,

45Very low,

179

Decision Matrix 3

Very Low /Low No: 179

Medium No:50

High No: 35

Very High No: 14

Shortlist – 4 Based on DM 2 and ZM list

Page 2619.04.23

Page 27

Bio-degradability

Very high High Medium Low

NoVery High

Very High3

Very High5

High,0

Medium,0

YesLow Very High,

11High,

30Medium,

50Very low,

179

Decision Matrix 4

Shortlist – 5 Based on DM 3 and Biodegradability

Low No: 179

Medium No: 50

High No: 30

Very High No: 19

Page 2819.04.23

Page 29

Feedback from APIIC and APPCB

• The approach and methodology for short listing of industries and the above short list was shared with APIIC and APPCB. APIIC has suggested removing some of the industrial parks as given below from the priority because of the nature of industries and working conditions.

• IP Tada• Kattedan• AN Kannuru• JAN Vijayawada• IE Vizaganagaram

APIIC has also suggested including the following industrial parks in the shortlist:

• IP Kurnool-ph 1 & ph 3 • APIIC Prodattur.• IP Vakalapudi.

19.04.23

Page 30

Feedback from APIIC and APPCB

Final Shortlist of IPs Requiring CETPs

•The final shortlist of IPs that require CETPs on immediate priority, which have been shortlisted based on the APIIC and APPCB feedback are:

• IP Gajualamandyam

• GC-Ongole

• IDA Rampur

• IP Pydabhimavaram

• IDA Kadapa

During IEID,

• GC Hindupur and

• IP Vakkalpudi

19.04.23

Page 31

Future Actions Conducting stakeholders meetings with officials of APIIC, APPCB, Industry Associations, representative from

Individual Industries and Experts from different Organizations/Sectors

Initiating further feasibility studies to arrive the base level/actual requirement/need for the CETPs in the old Industrial Parks and

Bid-process management for CETP for participating industrial parks

The current study also gives an approach for prioritizing industrial parks not only for CETPs, but also such analysis can be done for prioritizing IPs requiring solid waste management, air pollution, other common facilities etc., for

the industrial parks.

19.04.23

Page 3219.04.23

Thank you