P14415: Subsystem Design Review

30
P14415: Subsystem Design Review Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky

description

P14415: Subsystem Design Review. Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael Coffey Nathan Conklin Samuel Svintozelsky. Agenda. Background and Recap Information Engineering Requirement Flowdown Subsystems Proof of Concept Prototyping Economic Analysis Test Procedure & Risks Moving Forward. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Page 1: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Patrick Morabito John Wilson Michael CoffeyNathan ConklinSamuel Svintozelsky

Nathan Conklin
Take this slide out???
Page 2: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Agenda• Background and Recap Information

• Engineering Requirement Flowdown

• Subsystems

• Proof of Concepto Prototypingo Economic Analysis

• Test Procedure & Risks

• Moving Forward

Page 3: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Background InformationInadequate sanitation is a major cause of

preventable illnesses in children around the world. According to UNICEF, diarrhea alone causes over 1.6 million deaths in children under 5. These illnesses can easily be prevented by improving sanitation. However, cost is a major barrier limiting the adoption of sanitation in Haiti.

Peter Morgan’s Arborloo is a simple latrine built over a small pit, which when filled is then moved to a new pit location. The old, filled pit then has vegetation planted on top of it, such as a fruit tree.

Page 4: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

New Learnings

• Meeting with Johnnyo Low-cost reaffirmed as critical constrainto Building capabilities explored

• Mock up buildo Hole size requirement revisited

o Platform size improvementsxxx

Page 5: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Engineering Requirements - Updates

• S4-Maximum squat hole diameter

• S8-Complexity of tools needed

Page 6: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Critical Requirements Recap• Cost

o Continuously surfaces as primary requirement

• Weighto Crucial to remote users

• Load Bearing Abilityo Main functional requirement

(From Engineering Requirements) https://edge.rit.edu/edge/P14415/public/Project%20Planning%20Phase/Engineering_Requirements_14415.xls

Page 7: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Highlighted Functions

• Guides Raw Sewage• Supports Weight• Separates User from the Pit• Establishes Barrier Between User and

Waste

Page 8: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Subsystems

• Manufacturing Process

• Material Selection

• Shape & Form

Page 9: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Manufacturing Processes

Page 10: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Materials ConsideredCost Matrix

Acquired Quotes for these materials are a little too costly.

Page 11: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Design #1

• Explored Rib Design Models • Built Full Scale Mockup • Built Vacuum Formed Scale Model• Two Directions

Page 12: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Design #1 Rib Design Set up

2000N Load

Fixed at 4 corners

Model Tensile Strength: 9.5 * 10 ^7 N/m^2Fixed at 4 corners of baseLoad: 2000N Load*Refer to reports for mesh information

Page 13: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Design #1 Exploration

Page 14: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Design #1: Highlighted Beta Designs

Page 15: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Design 1 Rib Design Summary

Page 16: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Design #1 - Half Scale ModelPurpose:

● Test ABS Plastic● Test vacuum forming capabilities

Page 17: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Design #1 - Half Scale Model Cont.

Page 18: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Design #1 - Half Scale Model Cont.Lessons Learned

Weak/Thin Corners

Poor edge draft/vacuumStrong ribs & durable top surface

Page 19: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Design #2

• Full Scale Mockup• Material Selections• Cost Analysis

Page 20: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Design #2 Cost Analysis• 1 x 6” Design

o 11/16” thicko 14’ Plastic board o 10’ 2x2 ribbingo $43.7 total

• 10-¼ x ¼”o ¼” thicko 1.5 12’ boardo 10’ 2x2 ribbingo $35.66 total

Page 21: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Cost Analysis - Design #1 & #2 Full Scale Models

Page 22: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Designs #3 & #4

• Not Feasible Designs• Cardboard Models

o Difficult to sit and stando Scale required to cover hole required separate

supporting base

• Better as Seatso Can easily be integrated with a bucket

Page 23: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Updated Risks Assessment (Technical)

Page 24: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Updated Risks Assessment (Project)

Page 25: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Updated Risks Assessment (Team)

Page 26: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Test Plan - Revisited

Page 27: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Updated Project Plan

Page 28: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Key Decisions from Subsystem Phase• Design 1: Two Directions

o Plastic Ribbing & Supportso Recycled/Repurposed Material

• Design 2: “Local Industry”

• Designs 3 & 4: No Longer Full Designso Possible Seat Integration

• Possible Manufacturing Processeso Vacuum Formingo Rotational Moldingo “Kit”o Recycled

Page 29: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Moving Forward - Next Phase

• Design 1: Repurposed Materials Method• Design 2: Support Structure• Lid Designs• Seats (Upgradable)• Cleanability

Page 30: P14415: Subsystem Design Review

Questions?