“Overview of Ireland’s Experiences with RIA”
description
Transcript of “Overview of Ireland’s Experiences with RIA”
“Overview of Ireland’s Experiences with RIA”
OECD’s Good Governance for Development in Arab Countries Initiative : Working Group IV
Tunis, Tunisia, 16 February 2007
Tom Ferris Ireland
Contents of Presentation
1. Putting RIA in context2. Origins of RIA in Ireland3. Two Types of RIA 4. Structures for RIA 5. First RIA Results6. RIA Consulatation7. EU Groundwater Directive8. Challenges for RIA9. “Doing RIAs”10. “RIAs & Cons”
(1) RIA used to….
Clarify the justification for Regulation Assess the alternatives (taxes, grants or
fines) identify all costs and benefits enhance law-making quality improve governance systems improve public service outputs enhance consultation inform EU negotiations try and ensure “no surprises”
Regulatory Impact Assessment is……
A framework for assessing the likely effects of a proposed regulation, or of regulatory change
A means of assessing the impacts, side effects and costs of regulation
Includes structured consultation with stakeholders and citizens
A discipline to be applied at early stage in the regulatory cycle – before Government decides to regulate
Not a substitute for decision-making but can help to inform policy decisions
RIA is a vetting process…
Before recommending regulations, policy review groups should consider the potential for alternative approaches. This may include preparing a RIA, but it may not be required
When Memoranda brought to Government seeking approval for General Scheme of a Bill, RIA to be attached to such Memoranda
RIA to be applied to draft EU Directives once they have been published by the Commission
RIAs to be published subject to FOI exemptions
RIA allows policy-maker to...
Encourage a more structured and explicit examination of expected costs and benefits
Highlight importance of consultation with stakeholders Encourage earlier focus on enforcement and
compliance issues Who will enforce the regulations, what are the
compliance targets? Introduce performance indicators for regulations, so
that we can know if regulations are working well (or not working well)
Respond to EU legislative proposals
Are There Wider Benefits ?
Can help address cross-cutting issues
Can identify unintended effects as
well as alternative solutions
Demonstrates that RIA can help
inform Ireland’s negotiating position
and transposition of EU Directives
(2) Origins of Ireland’s RIA
Influence of OECD and EU on RIA in Ireland
“Delivering Better Government” (Irish Government
1996)
Public Service Modernisation Act 1997
OECD, Regulatory Reform in Ireland, 2001
“Regulating Better” (Irish Government 2004)
Cabinet 2005 Decision – RIA on all new regulations
“Towards 2016”, 10-Year Partnership Agreement
National Implementation Milestones in Ireland
2001 OECD Regulatory Review of Ireland
2002 Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) model developed
2004 Publication of Government White Paper, Regulating
Better RIA Pilot Projects
2005 Publication of RIA Report & Consultation Guidelines
2006 First set of RIAs were published
RIA Publications from Department of the Taoiseach
RIA Guidelines : How to conduct a
Regulatory Impact Analysis (2005)
A Report on the Introduction of
Regulatory Impact Analysis (2005)
Reaching out : Guidelines on Consultation
for Public Sector Bodies (2005)
www.betteregulation.ie
Benefits of Guidelines
Best Practices shared
Provoke ideas on alternative methods of consulting
Increase awareness among groups and individuals who wish to participate in the RIA process
Alerts interested parties on what to expect
www.betterregulation.ie
(3) Two Types of RIA
Two phased approach: Screening RIA
Applied to all primary legislation involving changes to regulatory framework, significant Statutory Instruments and draft EU Directives and EU Regulations
Full RIA Only conducted where Screening RIA suggests significant
impacts (six criteria identified above) or significant costs (initial cost of €10 million or cumulative costs of €50 million over 10 years)
Regulatory Proposal
Screening RIA
Info
rmal
Con
sultat
ion
Significant impacts?
No Yes
Full RIA
Form
al Con
sultation
Screening RIA to Government with Memorandum
Full RIA to Government with Memorandum
The RIA Process
How to do Screening RIA ?
Screening RIA to be applied to:
All primary legislation involving Changes to regulatory framework, Significant Statutory Instruments Draft EU Directives or Regulations
And Screening RIA involves ?
Description of policy context, objectives & policy options/choices
Identification of cost, benefits and other impacts of options
Informal consultation including Government Departments, consumer and other interests
Description of how enforcement and compliance will be achieved
Review – how will performance of regulations be measured?
How to do Full RIA ?
Full RIA only conducted where Screening RIA suggests: Significant impacts (six criteria
identified) Significant costs (initial cost of €10
million or cumulative costs of €50 million over 10 years)
International experience suggests Full RIA in 10-15% of cases
Full RIA where one of Six Criteria applies…
1. National competitiveness2. Socially excluded/vulnerable groups3. Impacts on the environment 4. Whether proposals involve a significant
policy change in an economic market including impacts on consumers and competition
5. Impacts on the rights of citizens 6. Whether the proposal involves a significant
compliance burden
And Full RIA involves ?
More detailed analysis of options More in-depth analysis of
impacts including in some cases CBA
Formal consultation Summary of pros and cons of
each option and identification of a recommended option where appropriate
(4) Structures for RIA
Government Secretariat
All Ministries
Ministry of Finance’s Training Centre
Ministries of Prime Minister and Finance
RIA check on Memos to Government
RIAs undertaken
Training and technical advice
Reality checks on robustness of RIAs
1. In-house expertise of economists; lawyers and analysts 2. Commission research and studies 3. Dedicated RIA Training
4. Networking for RIA 5. International Data and “best practice” Gathering Data / Information o In-house expertiseo Commission research o Dedicated RIA Training o Networking for RIA o Data /“best practice”o Other (e.g. Focus groups/questionnaires)
Critical Questions for RIA:To Enforce and Comply ?
Are proposals enforceable? e.g. resources
Who will enforce them?
How will consistency and accountability be
ensured?
What are compliance targets?
Do benefits justify compliance costs?
Critical success factors
High level administrative and political support
Central Support from Prime Minister’s Department
Awareness-raising and training
Development of RIA network for sharing of experience/best practice
Ongoing liaison with EU colleagues especially EU Directors of Better Regulation
Learning from doing – RIA very much an iterative process
(5) First Results --Pilot Departments/Offices
Health and Children Medical Practitioners Bill
Enterprise, Trade and Employment Export Controls Bill
Office of the Revenue Commissioners Betting Duty Regulations
Justice, Equality and Law Reform Coroners Bill
Environment, Heritage and Local Government Draft EU Groundwater Directive
Some Recent RIAs Report for Forfas, by ERM Environmental Resources Management Ireland Ltd.,
April 2005 Impact Assessment of the Proposed EU Chemical Policy (REACH)
Company Law Review Group, December 2005 Regulatory Impact Analysis on Directors’ Compliance Statement
Financial Regulator, December 2005 Regulatory Impact Analysis on Consumer Protection Code
Environment, Heritage and Local Government, May 2006 Waste Management (End-of-Life Vehicles) Regulations 2006, S.I. No. 282 of 2006
Enterprise, Trade and Employment, August 2006 Consumer Protection (National Consumer Agency) Bill 2006: Screening Regulatory
Impact Analysis
Enterprise, Trade and Employment, September 2006 Safety, Health and Welfare at Work (Construction) Regs., 2006
Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Nov. 2006 Part G (Hygiene) of the Building Regulations: Proposed requirement for Dual Flush
Toilets
Are Lessons Being Learned ?
Yes - many RIA lessons being learned :
More structured and explicit focus on the objectives behind
regulations – with identification of problems being addressed
Identification and analysis of alternative options for
achieving policy goals
Recognition of difficulties of analysing and quantifying the
costs associated with regulations
Experiences are now being shared
(6) RIA Needs to Have Consultation
To assist the decision-making process
To contribute to evidence-based policy
making
To help identify possible alternatives to
regulation
To strengthen focus of policy makers on the
needs of the public and end-consumer
Irish Consultation Guidelines Key Element of Regulatory Impact Assessment
(RIA)
Government White Paper ‘Regulating Better’: Action Plan 5.1
Procedures and Guidelines will be developed to promote better quality public consultation and to outline a full range of consultation options.
Consideration will be given to the mechanisms for ensuring balanced coordination procedures, taking care to consider the particular requirements for ‘not-for-profit’ groups
www.betterregulation.ie
Consultation means..
Structured public engagement with those whose views
are to be sought
Providing information to the key audience on the purpose
and subject of the consultation
e.g. a policy initiative, a regulatory change, a legislative
proposal or a service delivery
Seeking, receiving, analysing and responding to feedback
from the key audience
It is important to differentiate between
Ongoing consultative mechanisms (involving standing
committees, fora or groups) and
Once-off consultation exercises
Different Methods of Consultation
Written Consultations Questionnaire-based survey Internet and use of IT tools Face-to-Face Interviews Use of Focus Groups Public Meetings
Feedback and Review are Critical
Give feedback to key players and
those who participate
Publish and acknowledge
submissions made (taking account
of data protection etc.)
Review the consultation process
(7) EU Groundwater Directive
Slide 1 : Overview
Slide 2 : What work was required
Slide 3 : What Benefits
Slide 3 : What Costs
Ministry of Environment, Heritage and Local Government
Draft EU Groundwater Directive …(1)
1. Framework to protect surface and groundwater
2. EU : Nine Member States were doing this RIA
3. Ireland : Cross-sectoral Team (Ministry and Environmental Protection Agency etc.)
4. Objectıve : “....to protect and control water pollutıon...”
Ministry of Environment, Heritage and Local Government
Draft EU Groundwater Directive …(2)
1. Compulsory Directive…but with scope to adapt
2. Costs/benefits for economıc, envıronmental and socıal impacts to be included
3. Very technical and very complex matter
4. Team debated overall findings and conclusions- not into deep detail
5. Benefit of “CREATIVE BRAINSTORMING”
Ministry of Environment, Heritage and Local Government
Draft EU Groundwater Directive …(3)
BENEFITS
1. Quality of life – now and into the future
2. Less Water Treatment Plants (and so less costs)
3. Better farm practices (less pollution)
4. Better industry practices
Ministry of Environment, Heritage and Local Government
Draft EU Groundwater Directive… (4)
COSTS
1. More monitoring
2. More reports
3. More enforcement
4. More compliance (farms, mining and roads construction and maintenance)
(8) Challenges for RIA
Yes, many elements of RIA already there
But traditional ways will be challenged
Key players will feel some discomfort!
And yet if RIA is well explained there can be real benefits for the main players and in the public interest
Make every effort to share experiences