Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

16
Harriet Ward and Georgia Hyde Dryden , CCFR, Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change 1

description

Harriet Ward and Georgia Hyde Dryden , CCFR,. Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change . Safeguarding Babies and Very Young Children from Abuse and Neglect : (Ward, Brown and Westlake 2012; Ward, Brown and Maskell Graham, 2012). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

Page 1: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

1

Harriet Ward and Georgia Hyde Dryden , CCFR,

Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

Page 2: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

2

Safeguarding Babies and Very Young Children from Abuse and Neglect:(Ward, Brown and Westlake 2012; Ward, Brown and Maskell Graham, 2012) Prospective longitudinal study of 57 babies

identified as suffering or likely to suffer significant harm

All identified before first birthdays 43 followed until age three; 37 until age five.

Continuing now until ages 7- 8 Data from case papers; annual interviews

with birth parents/carers; Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires; interviews with children aged 7+

Very high risk sample

Page 3: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

3

Children Majority from families already known to

children’s social care through involvement with older siblings

65% identified before birth; almost all before they were six months old

63% were boys 69% White British; 31% from BME groups:

69% of these were of mixed heritage. High proportion of BME infants found in other studies (see Selwyn et al. 2010)

14% were identified as having disabilities or special health care needs. Children with disabilities are 3.4 times more likely to experience abuse and neglect (Sullivan and Knutson, 2000)

Page 4: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

4

Parents’ difficulties Primary risk factors: violence (at home

and in community), substance misuse issues, mental ill health, learning disabilities, experiences of abuse in childhood

Secondary risk factors: housing problems including homelessness, financial problems including bankruptcy

Isolation, poor relationships with extended family

Twenty mothers and an unknown number of fathers had already been permanently separated from at least one older child

Page 5: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

5

Factors associated with future harm

Abuse: eg Neglect, previous maltreatment

Child factors : eg Very young, developmental delay

Parent factors: eg Substance misuse, Personality disorder, learning disabilities plus mental illness, experience of abuse in childhood, denial

Parenting and parent-child interaction: disordered attachment

Family: Inter-parental conflict; power problems

Professional: eg lack of resources Social setting: isolation, violent

neighbourhood

Page 6: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

6

Classifying families by risk of harm Based on systematic review of evidence

concerning risk and protective factors and the likelihood of maltreatment or its recurrence (Hindley, Ramchandani and Jones, 2006)

Each child classified according to the level of risk of maltreatment or its recurrence

Classification used data at identification by children’s social care (Time One) at age three (Time Two) and at age five (Time Three)

Particular weight given to evidence of parents’ capacity for change

Page 7: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

7

The children at entry Severe risk (12:28%): Risk factors, no

protective factors and no capacity for change

High risk (7:16%): Risk factors, protective factors and no capacity for change

Medium risk (21:49%): Risk factors, protective factors, capacity for change

Low risk (3:7%): No risk factors (or previous risk factors addressed, protective factors and capacity for change. Includes two outliers

Page 8: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

8

At age three 35% (15) Permanently separated 28% (12) Medium –severe risk: inadequately

safeguarded with birth parents who had not shown capacity to change

53% (23) had experienced abuse or neglect 37% (16) maltreated in utero 37% (16) maltreated while open cases 57% displayed emotional problems or substantial

behavioural difficulties No evidence that 20 (47%) children

experienced maltreatment by the time they were three

37% (16) Low risk: adequately safeguarded, living with birth parents who had sustained positive changes

Page 9: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

Which parents can change? Parents who successfully changed were:

Less likely to have experienced abuse in childhood and substantially less likely to have experienced childhood sexual abuse

Able to come to terms with the removal of older children

Able to acknowledge the risks posed by their destructive behaviour patterns

Able not simply to engage with services but also to make positive use of the support they offered

Able to develop supportive informal networks

9

Page 10: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

The birth of a child as a catalyst for change No parent overcame substance misuse if

they continued to use drugs after the child had been born

All but one set of parents who made and sustained sufficient changes, had addressed all known risk factors by the time the child was six months old

A number of parents, including four of those who overcame substance misuse, spoke of a ‘wake-up call’ that acted as a catalyst for change. No parents in the insufficient change group spoke of such an epiphany

10

Page 11: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

Simon’s mother: what made her change? “My son being born, my son being born,

definitely. And I think the scare what social services gave me was a kick up the arse and the scare that I needed…They were going to put [Simon] into foster care…And I thought to myself, I just cannot, you know, you know what, I felt like a movie, I felt like, oh my god, my baby, not my baby. And he was so tiny, I felt like, oh no my baby, I felt like, and I thought you’re having a laugh, I couldn’t believe, you know…A big shock, a big shock, it was a big wake-up call and it was just a terrible feeling, I couldn’t believe it.”

11

Page 12: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

Assessing capacity to change Cross cutting assessment of parenting

capacity Cross-cutting assessment of children’s needs Case conceptualisation (analysis of gap

between parenting capacity and child’s needs) Agreed targets for change and goals set Additional support to achieve targets Objective measurement of changes

(Harnett, 2007)

12

Page 13: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

Facilitating engagement with services

Supporting the decisional balance (Prochaska et al. 1994)

Helping parents to engage – understanding the practitioner’s role

Effective practice in engaging families - Motivational Interviewing/ Family Group Conferences; Family Partnership Models

Understanding engagement: internal and external determinants of engagement; behavioural and interactional indicators of engagement (Platt, 2012)

13

Page 14: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

Supporting parents who changed Parents who changed were able to ask for help Received some effective interventions, but

these were often short term, and ended abruptly

No evidence of intensive evidence based interventions designed to address their needs (eg PUP; MST CAN)

Sometimes asked for more support, including extension of child protection plan

Support for parents in violent relationships could have unintended consequences (six parents no longer adequately safeguarding by age 5)

14

Page 15: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

Assessing parental capacity to change

Ward, Brown and Hyde Dryden (2014) Assessment needs to start early and be part of a process of setting goals, identifying appropriate services and monitoring change

Denial, motivation, engagement, action and relapse

Change is: Necessary to ensure that children are

safeguarded Difficult for parents to achieve Cannot be imposed, Complex, Takes time

15

Page 16: Overcoming Adversity and Capacity to Change

References

Hindley, N., Ramchandani, P.G. and Jones, D.P.H. (2006) ‘Risk factors for recurrence of maltreatment: A systematic review.’ Archives of Disease in Childhood 91, 9, 744-752.Jones, D., Hindley, N. and Ramchandani, P. (2006) ‘Making plans: assessment,intervention and evaluating outcomes’ in Aldgate, J., Jones, D. And Jeffery, C.(eds) The Developing World of the Child, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Platt, D. (2012) ‘Understanding parental engagement with child welfare services: an integrated model.’ Child & Family Social Work 17, 2, 138-148Prochaska, J., Velicer, W., Rossi, J., Goldstein, M., Marcus, B., Rakowski, W., Fiore, C., HJarlow, L., Redding, C., Rosenbloom, D. and Rossi, S. (1994) ‘Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviours.’ Health Psychology 13, 39-46..Selwyn, J. , Quinton, D., Harris, P. , Wijedasa, D., Nawaz, S. and Wood, M.(2010) Pathways to Permanence for Black, Asian and Mixed Etrhnicity Children, London: BAAF

Sullivan, P. and Knutson, J. (2000) ‘Maltreatment and disabilities: A population based epidemiological study.’ Child Abuse & Neglect 24, 10, 1257-1273.

Ward, H., Brown, R. and Westlake, D. (2012) Safeguarding Babies and Very Young Children from Abuse and Neglect. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Ward, H., Brown, R. and Maskell-Graham, D. (2012) Young Children Suffering, or Likely to Suffer, Significant Harm: Experiences on Entering Education. DFE RR209, London: Department for Education

Ward, H., Brown, R. and Hyde-Dryden, G.(2014) Assessing Parental Capacity to Change when Children are on the Edge of Care – an Overview of Current Research Evidence, London: Department for Education.

16