Orion - Plato Versus the Poet

download Orion - Plato Versus the Poet

of 2

Transcript of Orion - Plato Versus the Poet

  • 7/31/2019 Orion - Plato Versus the Poet

    1/2

    O R I O N s ep t emb er | october 201110

    Plato declared he would ban po-

    ets rom his ideal Republic. Placing

    a garland on their heads, he would

    send them into exile. Storytellers too with

    ew exceptions would be barred rom his

    state, and futes would be illegal.

    What does it mean to exile the arts?

    Plato knew, and so does the current Brit-

    ish government, ordering the most savage

    cuts to arts unding in more than a genera-

    tion. At universities, the arts and humani-

    ties will bear the brunt o budget cuts.

    Public libraries, a priceless commons o

    knowledge and metaphor, are being closed

    across the country.

    With phlegmatic cynicism, Plato based

    his Republicon the premise that an idealstate will seek expansion, encroaching on

    neighboring lands and resources, result-

    ing in permanent war. His Republic de-

    scribes the ideal education or the states

    rulers and warriors to help them pursue

    these aims. Hierarchical, militaristic, and

    consumerist, it is a state ounded on class

    divisions, obsessive measurement, andcontrol. (Any likeness to any nation today

    is, o course, purely coincidental.)

    State unding or the arts is not neces-

    sary, claim governments on both sides o

    the Atlantic. Why? Because art is superfu-

    ous. I couldnt agree more: art is surplus

    to base needs and bare necessities, and its

    very superfuity is its signicance. The

    arts are not necessary: they are absolutely

    essential to the human spirit which nds

    The exie of The ArTs

    Thirsting for metaphor in an age of literalism

    transcendence through exceeding limits,

    overfowing borders, and ba

  • 7/31/2019 Orion - Plato Versus the Poet

    2/2

    s ep t emb er | october 2011 O R I O N 11

    in protest.) A reverse Walt Whitman, he

    banned the poet rom imitating smiths, ar-

    ticers, oarsmen, or boatswains; nor may

    they imitate the neighing o horses, the bel-

    lowing o bulls, the murmur o rivers and

    roll o the ocean. But the expression o

    the natural world the unaded world o

    sa=ron and lapis lazuli is one o the su-

    preme achievements o humanity. We are

    the tongue on the body o the land, says a

    Yolngu woman. Humanity, part troubadour

    and part nightingale, translates the world

    in artistic re-creation,and rom Shakespeare to

    the Aboriginal Australian

    songlines to the Sami yoik

    songs, art evokes nature

    and enchants the land.

    Van Gogh, the arche-

    typal ununded artist,

    painted his sunfowers as

    i his ngers were touched

    with re. Now, his sun-

    fowers are turning brown

    beore our eyes as the pig-

    ment mix reacts to sunlight.

    But the ading sunfowers

    also bear a metaphoric

    reproach against a dingy

    age that extinguishes thecolors o art and the vitality

    o nature alike, an age that

    would blindold a robin

    and a painter, and wing-

    bind a bird o paradise and

    a dancer. I the arts enjoin

    us to nature, corporate con-

    sumerism exiles us into acold exchequer.

    Yet consumerism and

    the arts are both answers

    to the same yearning. The human spirit

    thirsts or the superfuous, or over-

    fow and abundance. Literalism wants

    that abundance made material, though,

    whereas metaphorical abundance resists

    any need or literal overconsumption.

    Metaphors o extravagant liveliness reduce

    a hunger or extravagant liestyles. Stuck

    in literal abundance, however, a society

    is credulous to the monostory o money.

    While metaphor and the arts o=er plural-

    ities and di=erent voices, literalism, rom

    Plato onward, speaks in a political mono-

    tone, the one state ruling, top-down.

    Essential to our sel-expression as indi-

    viduals and as a species, art suggests some-

    thing o the divine: humanitys purpose is

    to participate in the world-creators play o

    creation, said Indian poet Rabindranath

    Tagore. For the Kogi people o Colombia, it

    is only through the human heart and imagi-

    nation that the Great Mother can be made

    maniest. Imagination is connected to the

    word magic, and there is mind-magic in

    art where artists are messengers rom the

    invisible world angels, in other words,

    rom the Greek word angellos, meaning

    messenger. Palestinian poet Mahmoud

    Darwish wrote:

    The stars had only one task: they

    taught me how to read.

    They taught me I had a language in

    heaven

    and another language on earth.

    Art is a messenger carrying to its audience

    what Arthur Miller called news o the in-

    ner world, and, he con-tinued, i people went too

    long without such news,

    they would go mad with

    the chaos o their lives.

    A writer touches the

    page to her lips beore she

    sends the message on. A

    sculptor res the clay with

    love and meaning. Using

    the sense o sight, a painter

    turns an ordinary gaze into

    the extraordinary regard o

    honoring. Using the sense

    o hearing, a musician

    turns ordinary listening

    into extraordinary acknowl-

    edgment. And when some-one says that a work o art

    touched him, or that a

    book changed her lie, a

    subtle transormation o

    mind is revealed. For the

    greatest artists do not

    make their best works o

    art in clay or paint orsound or words: they make

    them right inside us,

    within the heart o the

    reader or audience. By art, humanity is

    sculpted more tender and more true: we

    are altered and touched and made magni-

    cent. We are each others works o art.a

    Jay Grifths is the author ofWild: An

    Elemental Journey.