ORCID: just a DOI for authors?
description
Transcript of ORCID: just a DOI for authors?
![Page 1: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ORCID: just a DOI for authors?
Richard WynneVice President of Sale and Marketing, Aries Systems Corporation
![Page 2: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
![Page 4: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Chronic “pain points”
• Frequently occurring
• Re-assemble everything
![Page 6: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Solution!
• Not completely broken• Repeatedly dealing with same
problem• Temporary, unsatisfactory fixes• 15 years!• Elegant technical solution
available
![Page 7: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Pain Point: “attribution”
Pain Point: authors not systematically recognized for their publications in the bibliographic record
Good news! ORCID aims to solve the author/contributor name ambiguity problem in scholarly communications by creating a central registry of unique identifiers
ORCID as metadata – capturing author and co-author ORCIDs during submission will feed the bibliographic record
![Page 8: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Editorial Manager Peer Review System
• Capture submitting author ORCID
• Support for other IDs (e.g. ISNI)
• “Optional” or “required”, based on journal/publisher policy
• “Optional” or “required” for co-authors
• Available now – version 9.2 in Beta testing
• “Smart” capture – “fetch”
4444-4444-4444-444X
![Page 9: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
“We see significant advantages to ORCID and have encouraged Aries to support its collection during peer review workflow. We’re keen to deploy the new functionality to the 238 Wolters Kluwer journals using Editorial Manager.”
Karen Abramson President &CEOWolters Kluwer Health Medical Research
![Page 10: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
““We are committed to ORCID and welcome new functionality in Editorial Manager that will enable its use during submission and peer review .”
Jacqueline ThaiSenior Editorial Manager, PLoS ONE
![Page 11: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
“Springer SBM processes hundreds of thousands of manuscripts per year so integration of ORCID with Editorial Manager is an essential development”
Arjan GrootenboerExecutive Vice President Production at Springer Science+Business Media
![Page 12: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
“Discovery & Attribution”Good news! ORCID aims to solve the author/contributor name ambiguity problem in scholarly communications by creating a central registry of unique identifiers
Manuscript Supply Chain
![Page 13: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Chronic Pain Points in “Supply Chain”
• Registration and data collection• Multiple credentials• Disclosure• Co-author management• Conflict of interest• Cross journal transfer• Author fees• Authorized communication• Workload balancing• Permissions, ….many more…
Inefficient
Unnecessarily complex
Repetitive
Inconvenient
Inflexible
Duplicative
…etc.
![Page 14: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Pain Point: registration and data collection
• Pain point: repeated registration• Pain point: different registration policies• Pain point: aging data
ORCID:
Data
Peer review system
ORCIDBiographical information
![Page 15: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Pain Point: multiple credentials
• Pain point: “every publisher and every publisher system requires different sign-in credentials”
System 1 System 2 System 3 System 4
ORCID
“If the user can sign into ORCID, then give them access to the system”
![Page 16: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Pain Point: disclosure
• Pain point: every journal requires disclosure
ORCID:
Disclosure Data
Peer review system
Disclosure storage based on ORCID ID
Disclosure information
![Page 17: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Pain Point: Co-author management
• Pain point: laborious entry of co-author information by submitting author
• Pain point: data accuracy and currency• Pain point: validation of co-authors by journal
Coauthor ORCID:
Data
Peer review system
ORCID
Co-author validates with ORCID log-in
Co-author validated
Co-author biographical data
email to co-author
![Page 18: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Pain Point: conflict of interest• Pain point: when selecting reviewers how do you identify
every potential conflict of interest with every contributing author?
Peer review system
Contributing author ORCIDs
Candidate reviewer ORCID
ORCID
Biographical data concerning prior employment and publications
![Page 19: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Pain Point: cross journal transfer• Pain point: duplicate work and multiple
reviews of the same manuscript
Peer review system
Author and coauthor biographical information
Reviewer and editor biographical information
Peer review system
Author and coauthor biographical information
Reviewer and editor biographical information
ORCID matching
ORCID matching
Intra- and inter- publisher
manuscript transfer
![Page 20: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Pain Point: author fees• Pain point: high administration costs to
process author fees (not just OA fees: page charges, color fees etc.)
Diagnosis: High levels of complexity limits automation. For example, discounts based on: membership, institution, geographical location, journal subscription, etc.
How will ORCID help? A validated author ORCID provides accurate biographic information. This means that author fee level can be automatically determined. E.g. The OA fee for authors from MIT is $X.
The future: High levels of automation will allow new, flexible author “point” pricing models – built into the workflow - with greatly reduced “friction”
![Page 21: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
These highly beneficial solutions can only be built on an author “validated” ORCID – “dumb”
metadata are not enough
Question: How do you get the contributor to validate their ORCID?
Context: Editorial Manager: 4,600 Journals. 200+ Publishers. Millions of registered users.
![Page 22: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
One time validation - technicalContributor record in Editorial Manager peer review system:
4444-4444-4444-444X
4444-4444-4444-444X
![Page 23: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Possible example
![Page 24: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Addressing a pain point
Benefit: Authors will can normalize their log-in credentials (single UN/PW) across different systems and publishers
Benefit: Author updates their information in one place (ORCID), and updates can be collected by external systems
![Page 25: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
• Not just hypertext
• Not proprietary
• Networked
• Network effects
• Fundamental change in the ROI for developers
“Just hypertext”
![Page 26: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Summary
• ORCID as metadata will help improve “attribution” problem during discovery
• But “attribution” is not the only “pain point” in scholarly publishing workflow
• Author “Validated” ORCIDs are key to addressing these pain points
• Dynamic, focused, collaborative and entrepreneurial organizations see opportunities to address these chronic scholarly publishing “pain points”
![Page 27: ORCID: just a DOI for authors?](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56813fd0550346895daab0e4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
ORCID: much more than just a DOI for authors!
Richard WynneVice President of Sale and Marketing, Aries Systems Corporation