Optimization of photocatalytic treatment of dye solution on supported ...
Transcript of Optimization of photocatalytic treatment of dye solution on supported ...
1
Optimization of photocatalytic degradation of sulfonated diazo dye
C.I. Reactive Green 19 using ceramic coated TiO2 nanoparticles
Masoud Rastegar Farajzadeha, Kamran Rahmati Shadbada, Alireza Khataeeb,Reza Pourrajaba
a Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Tabriz, Tabriz,
Iran
b Water and Wastewater Company of East Azerbaijan, Tabriz, Iran
* Corresponding author:
Tel.: +98 411 3393165;
Fax: +98 411 3340191;
E-mail: [email protected]
2
Abstract
Optimization of photocatalytic degradation of C.I. Reactive Green 19 (RG19)
under UV light irradiation using ceramic coated TiO2 nanoparticles in a rectangular
photoreactor was studied. The investigated TiO2 was Millennium PC–500 (crystallites
mean size 8 nm) immobilized on ceramic plates. Central composite design was used
for optimization of UV/TiO2 process. Predicted values of decolorization efficiency
were found to be in good agreement with experimental values (R2= 0.97 and Adj–R2=
0.91). Optimization results showed that maximum decolorization efficiency was
achieved at the optimum conditions: initial dye concentration 10 mg/L, UV light
intensity 47.2 W/m2, flow rate 150 mL/min and reaction time 240 min. Photocatalytic
mineralization of RG19 was monitored by chemical oxygen demand (COD) decrease
and changes in UV–Vis spectrum.
Keywords: TiO2 nanoparticles; Photodegradation; Immobilization; Ceramic plates;
Response surface methodology;
3
1. Introduction
A well-flourished textile industrial development has originated increasing use of a
wide variety of synthetic dyes and pollution by wastewater contaminated with
dyestuff is becoming increasingly alarming worldwide [1, 2]. The azo dyes make up
about a half of all known dyestuffs in the world, making them the largest group of
synthetic colorants released into the environment [3]. Reactive group of azo dyes are
mostly used in textile dyeing due to their superior fastness to the applied fabric, high
photolytic stability and recalcitrant to microbial degradation. However, reactive dyes
exhibit low levels of fixation with the fiber and up to 10–50% of total dye used in
dyeing process remain left in the spent dye bath [4, 5]. C.I. Reactive Green 19 (RG19)
is an examples of reactive dyes bearing two azo groups as the chromophoric moiety
and two chlorotriazine groups as reactive groups (see Table 1). Many synthetic azo
dyes and their metabolites are toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, leading to potential
health hazard to humankind [4]. In general, the treatment of dye–containing effluents
is being undertaken by biological, adsorption, membrane, coagulation–flocculation,
oxidation–ozonation, and Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) [6]. AOPs have
been developed to degrade the nonbiodegradable contaminants of drinking water and
industrial effluents into harmless species (e.g. CO2, H2O, etc). Heterogeneous
photocatalysis via combination of TiO2 and UV light is considered one of the most
promising AOPs for destruction of water–soluble organic pollutants [7, 8].
In the literature reports, the most widely used photocatalytic process is carried out
in a batch slurry photoreactor operating with titanium dioxide suspensions [9-11].
However, slurry reactors have a number of practical and economical disadvantages
which were mentioned in our previous works [12, 13]. In order to solve these
problems, supported photocatalysts have been developed. The most important
4
properties of a suitable support are to be chemically inert, to present a high specific
surface area and to be transparent to UV radiation [14]. In this work, ceramic plates
were used as a support of TiO2 nanoparticles.
In the conventional methods used to determine the influence of operational
parameters, experiments were carried out varying systematically the studied
parameter and keeping constant the others. This should be repeated for all the
influencing parameters, resulting in an unreliable number of experiments. Response
surface methodology (RSM) is a statistical method being useful for the optimization of
chemical reactions and/or industrial processes and widely used for experimental design
[15]. RSM also quantifies the relationship between the controllable input parameters and
the obtained response surfaces [16]. Process optimization by RSM is faster for gathering
experimental research results than the rather conventional, time consuming one-factor-at-
a-time approach [17].
In our previous works, we have studied optimization of photocatalytic degradation
of acidic and basic dyes using TiO2 nanoparticles immobilized on non–woven papers
and glass plates [12, 13]. In this work, ceramic plates were used as a support of TiO2
nanoparticles. The central composite design (CCD) was applied to the optimization of
photocatalytic treatment of RG19 solution on immobilized TiO2 nanoparticles in a
rectangular photocatalytic reactor. The factors (variables) investigated were the
reaction time, initial dye concentration, flow rate and UV light intensity. Chemical
oxygen demand removal was monitored in order to explain the mineralization of the
dye in the UV/TiO2 process.
5
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
The investigated photocatalyst was Millennium TiO2 PC–500 (anatase>99%,
crystallites mean size 8 nm) immobilized on ceramic plates. These characteristics
were proved by our XRD and TEM analyses [13]. BET surface area and total pore
volume of the used photocatalyst were 320.76 m2/g and 0.3104 cm3/g, respectively.
The dye, C.I. Reactive Green 19, was obtained from Alvan Sabet Company, Iran. Its
chemical structure and characteristics are given in Table 1. Methanol,
methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMOS) and HCl were obtained from Merck Co., Germany.
2.2. Immobilization of TiO2 nanoparticles on ceramic plates
TiO2 nanoparticles were fixed on ceramic plates by sol-gel dip-coating method.
Organically modified silica (Ormosil) was used as hydrophobic binder. The coating
solution contained 23 mL of methanol, 0.264 g of TiO2 nanoparticles, and appropriate
amount of methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMOS), which was set to achieve the desired
TiO2/Ormosil weight ratio. HCl solution (1 N) was added for hydrolysis of MTMOS.
The suspension was sonicated for 15 min by a Sonoplus Ultrasonic Homogenizer HD
2200, Germany. The main advantage of this kind of films is that they have good
mechanical anchoring due to the chemical bonding, in comparison with films made
with the dried mixture of TiO2 and water. Figure 1 shows the SEM images of the
ceramic plate before and after immobilization of TiO2 nanoparticles on it. As shown
in Figure 1, the entire surface of the ceramic plate has been coated with TiO2
nanoparticles. The coated plates were thoroughly washed with distilled water for the
removal of free TiO2 particles.
6
2.3. Photocatalysis experiments
The experimental set–up is based on a rectangular photocatalytic reactor with
workable of area 15 × 90 cm2, made out of stainless steel that its schematic diagram
and function were explained previously . 2000 mL solutions of RG19 were degraded in
all cases. Artificial irradiation was provided by three 30 W UV–C lamps (Philips, The
Netherlands) with peak intensity at 254 nm, positioned above the reactor. The lamps
were turned on at the beginning of each experiment. The distance between the
solution and the UV source was adjusted according to the experimental conditions. On
the surface of the solution, the radiation intensity was measured by a UV radiometer
purchased from Cassy Lab Company, Germany. At different reaction times obtained
with experimental design, 2 mL sample were taken and the remaining RG19 was
determined using a spectrophotometer at λmax= 630 nm and calibration curve. Using
this method, the percentage of color removal could be obtained. The percent color
removal (CR (%)) was expressed as the percentage ratio of decolorized dye
concentration to that of the initial one.
2.4. Analytical procedures
The photocatalytic reactions were monitored by UV–Vis spectrophotometer (WPA
lightwave S2000, England) in the range of 200–700 nm. Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) was carried out on a Hitachi SEM (Model S–4160, USA) device
after gold–plating of the samples. Nitrogen sorption analyses were obtained with a
(Micrometrics, Gimini series) sorptometer using standard continuous procedures at
77.15 K on calcined samples that had been degassed at 363 K for one hour and then at
403 K under high vacuum for at least 10 hours. The surface area was calculated
7
according to the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) model over a relative pressure range
of 0.05–0.90.
2.5. Experimental design
In the present study central composite design was employed for optimization of
photocatalytic decolorization process. In order to evaluate the influence of operating
parameters on the photocatalytic decolorization efficiency of RG19, four main factors
were chosen: initial dye concentration (mg/L) (X1), UV light intensity (W/m2) (X2), flow
rate (mL/min) (X3) and reaction time (min) (X4). A total of 31 experiments were
employed in this work, including 24=16 cube points, 7 replications at the center point and
8 axial points. Experimental data were analyzed using Minitab 15 software. For statistical
calculations, the variables Xi were coded as xi according to the following equation:
XXXx 0i
i
(1)
where X0 is the value of Xi at the center point and X presents the step change [18, 19].
The experimental ranges and the levels of the independent variables for RG19 removal
are given in Table 2. It should be mentioned that preliminary experiments were performed
to determine the extreme values of the variables.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. CCD model and analysis of variance (ANOVA) study
The 4–factor CCD matrix and experimental results obtained in the photocatalytic
decolorization runs are presented in Table 3. The second–order polynomial response
equation (Eq. (2)) was used to correlate the dependent and independent variables.
8
Y=b0 + b1x1 + b2x2 + b3x3 + b4x4 + b12x1x2 + b13x1x3 + b14x1x4 + b23x2x3 + b24x2x4 +
b34x3x4 + b1121x + b22
22x + b33
23x + b44
24x (2)
where Y is the response variable of decolorization efficiency. The bis are regression
coefficients for linear effects; bik the regression coefficients for quadratic effects and xi
represent coded experimental levels of the variables.
Based on these results, an empirical relationship between the response and
independent variables was attained and expressed by the following second–order
polynomial equation:
Y=42.005–9.681x1+3.880x2+1.835x3+9.024x4+4.482x1x2–0.561x1x3–1.128x1x4–
0.806x2x3+3.591x2x4–1.968x3x4–0.543 21x +0.381 2
2x +0.301 23x –1.163 2
4x (3)
Photocatalytic decolorization efficiencies (CR (%)) have been predicted by Eq. (3)
and presented in Table 3. These results indicated good agreements between the
experimental and predicted values of decolorization efficiency. The regression coefficient
(R2) quantitatively evaluates the correlation between the experimental data and the
predicted responses. Experimental results and the predicted values obtained using model
(Eq. (3)) are shown in Figure 2. As can be seen, the predicted values match the
experimental values reasonably well with R2 of 0.97. This implies that 97% of the
variations for percent color removal are explained by the independent variables and this
also means that the model does not explain only about 3% of variation. Adjusted R2 (Adj–
R2) is also a measure of goodness of a fit, but it is more suitable for comparing models
with different numbers of independent variables. It corrects R2–value for the sample size
and the number of terms in the model by using the degrees of freedom on its
computations [20]. Here, Adj–R2 value (0.91) was very close to the corresponding R2
value (see Table 3).
9
Table 4 indicates the results of the quadratic response surface model fitting in the
form of analysis of variance (ANOVA). ANOVA is required to test the significance and
adequacy of the model [20]. ANOVA subdivides the total variation of the results in two
components: variation associated with the model and variation associated with the
experimental error, showing whether the variation from the model is significant or not
when compared with the ones associated with residual error [21]. This comparison is
performed by F–value, which is the ratio between the mean square of the model and the
residual error. If the model is a good predictor of the experimental results, F–value should
be greater than the tabulated value of F–distribution for a certain number of degrees of
freedom in the model at a level of significance α. F–value obtained, 23.91, is clearly
greater than the tabulated F (2.352 at 95% significance) confirming the adequacy of the
model fits.
The student's t distribution and the corresponding values, along with the parameter
estimate, are given in Table 5. The P–values were used as a tool to check the significance
of each of the coefficients, which in turn, are necessary to understand the pattern of the
mutual interactions between the test variables. The larger the magnitude of the student's t–
test and smaller P–value, the more significant is the corresponding coefficient [22].
3.2. Effect of variables as response surface and counter plots
To study the effect of initial dye concentration on photocatalytic decolorization
efficiency, the experiments were carried out with initial dye concentration varying
from 2 to 18 mg/L at constant flow rate (150 mL/min) and UV light intensity (29.7
W/m2). The results have been displayed in Figure 3. This figure shows that the
photocatalytic decolorization efficiency slightly decreases with an increase in the
initial amount of RG19. This may be attributed to several factors. At high dye
10
concentration, the adsorbed dye molecules may occupy all the active sites of TiO2
surface and this leads to decrease in degradation efficiency. It means that as the
concentration of the dye increases, more and more molecules of the dye get adsorbed
on the surface of the photocatalyst. Therefore, requirement of the reactive species
(OH and O2–) needed for the degradation of the dye also increase. However, the
formation of OH and O2– on the catalyst surface remains constant for a given light
intensity, catalyst amount and duration of irradiation. Hence, the available hydroxyl
radicals are inadequate for the degradation of the dye at high concentrations.
Consequently, the degradation efficiency of the dye decreases as the concentration
increases [23, 24]. In addition an increase in substrate concentration can lead to the
generation of intermediates, which may adsorb on the surface of the catalyst. Slow
diffusion of the generated intermediates from the catalyst surface can result in the
deactivation of active sites of the photocatalyst and consequently, a reduction in the
degradation efficiency. In contrast, at low concentration, the number of the catalytic
sites will not be limiting factor and the rate of degradation is proportional to the
substrate concentration [10]. Another reason may be due to the absorption of light
photon by the dye itself leading to a lesser availability of photons for hydroxyl radical
generation [11].
Figure 4 illustrates the effect of UV light intensity and reaction time on
photocatalytic decolorization efficiency for initial dye concentration of 10 mg/L and
flow rate of 150 mL/min. As it is obvious from Figure 4, decolorization efficiency
increased with increasing UV light intensity and reaction time. The reason of this
observation is thought to be the fact that UV light intensity determines the extent of
light absorption by the photocatalyst to form electron–hole pairs which results in the
11
overall pollutant conversion. In other words, higher light intensity provides higher
energy for more TiO2 nanoparticles to produce electron–hole pairs [25].
Figure 5 shows the response surface and contour plots of photocatalytic
decolorization efficiency as a function of flow rate and reaction time. A slightly
improvement in photocatalytic decolorization efficiency with increasing flow rate has
been observed. The presumed reason is that when the dye solution flow rate is
increased, the turbulence in the system is enhanced. It may lead to decompose more
and more adsorbed dye molecules on the surface of TiO2 thus photocatalytic
decolorization efficiency increases. The high decolorization efficiencies at high flow
rates were also attributed to the increase in the mass transfer coefficient [26]. The
finding is in agreement with literature reports where higher photocatalytic efficiency
would result in higher flow rates [27-29]. As an instance, Mehrotra et al. [27]
explained the effect of circulation flow rates on photocatalytic degradation rate of
benzoic acid. They found that if the external mass transfer resistance existed, the
reaction rate would depend on the circulation flow rate (Q), particularly when
circulation flow rate was low. The external mass transfer resistance can be reduced to
a minimum by increasing mixing of fluid through stirring or increasing the circulating
flow rate (Reynolds number, Re) of the reaction medium.
3.3. Photocatalytic mineralization of RG19 at optimal conditions
Contour and surface plots for dye removal have been shown in Figures 3–5. Such
three-dimensional surfaces could give accurate geometrical representation and provide
useful information about the behavior of the system within the experimental design [30].
It is clear from these plots that the dye removal is favorable at optimum values. The
optimum values of the process variables for the maximum decolorization efficiency were
12
10 mg/L, 47.2 W/m2, 150 mL/min and 240 min for initial dye concentration (X1), UV
light intensity (X2), flow rate (X3) and reaction time (X4), respectively. At these optimum
values, the predicted and observed CR (%) was 70.35 and 69.36%, respectively.
Optimum values of the variables are given in Table 6. Photocatalytic mineralization of
the dye in UV/TiO2 process studied with 20 mg/L of RG19 solution at the achieved
optimum conditions. Mineralization was monitored by COD and changes in UV−Vis
spectrum.
COD is the measurement of the amount of oxygen in water consumed for
chemical oxidation total concentration of organics in the solution and the decrease of
COD reflects the degree of mineralization at the end of the photocatalytic process.
COD disappearance of RG19 has been depicted in Figure 6. The results indicated that
more than 92% COD removal was achieved under optimized conditions at the
irradiation time of 9 h. It implies that the strategy to optimize the decolorization
conditions and to obtain the maximal degradation efficiency by RSM for photocatalytic
decolorization of RG19 in this study is successful.
The changes in the UV–Vis spectra of RG19 during the photocatalytic process at
different irradiation times are shown in Figure 7. The dye carries two azo groups as
the chromophoric moiety and two chlorotriazine groups as reactive groups in different
sites on the molecule. The color of RG19 is the result of chromospheres such as azo
functional group and the two substituted aromatic species. The decrease of the
absorption peak of the dye at the maximum absorption wavelength (630 nm) in Figure
7 indicates photocatalytic destruction of RG19. The decrease is also meaningful with
respect to the nitrogen-to-nitrogen double bond (–N=N–) in RG19, as the most active
site for oxidative attack. Decrease in absorption intensity of the band at λmax during
13
the irradiation also expresses the loss of conjugation, especially the cleavage near the
azo bond of the organic molecule.
The weak band at 342-430 nm could be attributed to the *n and π-π*
transition related to the aromatic ring attached to the –N=N– group and –N=N– in the
dye molecule. The band at 224 nm could be attributed to the * and
*n transitions related to the aromatic rings attached to the azo group and also to a
secondary amine in the dye molecule. Absorbance decrease at 261–297 nm indicates
the degradation of aromatic part of the dye molecule [31].
Conclusions
The photocatalytic treatment of a textile dye RG19, from aqueous solution in a
rectangular photocatalytic reactor was optimized. Effect of operational parameters on
the decolorization efficiency of RG19 was evaluated by the response surface and
contour plots. The optimum values of initial dye concentration, UV light intensity,
flow rate and reaction time were 10 mg/L, 47.2 W/m2, 150 mL/min, 240 min,
respectively. Analysis of variance showed a high coefficient of determination (R2=
0.97 and Adj–R2= 0.91), thus ensuring a satisfactory adjustment of the second order
regression model with the experimental data. The results of COD decrease and UV–
Vis spectrum changes indicated that photocatalytic process could be used for
complete decolorization and mineralization of RG19.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Water and Wastewater Company of East Azerbaijan for
financial supports. The authors also wish to thank the University of Tabriz for all the
supports provided.
14
References
[1] J.J. Pignatello, E. Oliveros, A. MacKay, Advanced oxidation processes for organic
contaminant destruction based on the Fenton reaction and related chemistry (vol 36,
pg 1, 2006), Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 37 (2007) 273-275.
[2] C. Fernandez, M.S. Larrechi, M.P. Callao, An analytical overview of processes for
removing organic dyes from wastewater effluents, Trac Trend. Anal. Chem., 29
(2010) 1202-1211.
[3] J.-S. Chang, C. Chou, Y.-C. Lin, P.-J. Lin, J.-Y. Ho, T. Lee Hu, Kinetic
characteristics of bacterial azo-dye decolorization by Pseudomonas luteola, Water
Res., 35 (2001) 2841-2850.
[4] A. Kurosumi, E. Kaneko, Y. Nakamura, Degradation of reactive dyes by
ozonation and oxalic acid-assimilating bacteria isolated from soil, Biodegradation, 19
(2008) 489-494.
[5] P. Patil, U. Shedbalkar, D. Kalyani, J. Jadhav, Biodegradation of Reactive Blue 59
by isolated bacterial consortium PMB11, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 35 (2008)
1181-1190.
[6] A.R. Khataee, G. Dehghan, A. Ebadi, M. Zarei, M. Pourhassan, Biological
treatment of a dye solution by macroalgae Chara sp.: Effect of operational
parameters, intermediates identification and artificial neural network modeling,
Bioresour. Technol., 101 (2010) 2252-2258.
[7] A.R. Khataee, Photocatalytic removal of CI Basic Red 46 on immobilized TiO2
nanoparticles: Artificial neural network modelling, Environ. Technol., 30 (2009)
1155-1168.
[8] S. Kwon, M. Fan, A.T. Cooper, H.Q. Yang, Photocatalytic applications of micro-
and Nano-TiO2 in environmental engineering, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 38
(2008) 197-226.
[9] N. Daneshvar, D. Salari, A.R. Khataee, Photocatalytic degradation of azo dye acid
red 14 in water on ZnO as an alternative catalyst to TiO2, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A,
162 (2004) 317-322.
[10] K. Selvam, M. Muruganandham, I. Muthuvel, M. Swaminathan, The influence of
inorganic oxidants and metal ions on semiconductor sensitized photodegradation of 4-
fluorophenol, Chem. Eng J., 128 (2007) 51-57.
15
[11] R.A. Damodar, J.T. Swaminathan, Decolourization of reactive dyes by thin film
immobilized surface photoreactor using solar irradiation, Sol. Energy, 81 (2007) 1-7.
[12] A.R. Khataee, M. Fathinia, S. Aber, M. Zarei, Optimization of photocatalytic
treatment of dye solution on supported TiO2 nanoparticles by central composite
design: Intermediates identification, J. Hazard. Mater., 181 (2010) 886-897.
[13] A.R. Khataee, M. Zarei, M. Fathinia, M.K. Jafari, Photocatalytic degradation of
an anthraquinone dye on immobilized TiO2 nanoparticles in a rectangular reactor:
Destruction pathway and response surface approach, Desalination, 268 (2011) 126-
133.
[14] A.R. Khataee, M. Fathinia, S. Aber, Kinetic Modeling of Liquid Phase
Photocatalysis on Supported TiO2 Nanoparticles in a Rectangular Flat-Plate
Photoreactor, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 49 (2010) 12358-12364.
[15] A.R. Khataee, Optimization of UV-promoted peroxydisulphate oxidation of C.I.
Basic Blue 3 using response surface methodology, Environ. Technol., 31 (2010) 73-
86.
[16] H.L. Liu, Y.R. Chiou, Optimal decolorization efficiency of Reactive Red 239 by
UV/TiO2 photocatalytic process coupled with response surface methodology, Chem.
Eng. J., 112 (2005) 173-179.
[17] A.K. Abdessalem, N. Oturan, N. Bellakhal, M. Dachraoui, M.A. Oturan,
Experimental design methodology applied to electro-Fenton treatment for degradation
of herbicide chlortoluron, Appl. Catal. B, 78 (2008) 334-341.
[18] K.S. Nascimento, P.A.J. Rosa, K.S. Nascimento, B.S. Cavada, A.M. Azevedo,
M.R. Aires-Barros, Partitioning and recovery of Canavalia brasiliensis lectin by
aqueous two-phase systems using design of experiments methodology, Sep. Purif.
Technol., 75 (2010) 48-54.
[19] A.R. Khataee, G. Dehghan, E. Ebadi, M. Pourhassan, Central composite design
optimization of biological dye removal in the presence of macroalgae Chara sp.,
CLEAN - Soil, Air, Water, 38 (2010) 750-757.
[20] S. Yi, Y. Su, B. Qi, Z. Su, Y. Wan, Application of response surface methodology
and central composite rotatable design in optimizing the preparation conditions of
vinyltriethoxysilane modified silicalite/polydimethylsiloxane hybrid pervaporation
membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol., 71 (2010) 252-262.
16
[21] M. Zarei, A. Niaei, D. Salari, A.R. Khataee, Application of response surface
methodology for optimization of peroxi-coagulation of textile dye solution using
carbon nanotube-PTFE cathode, J. Hazard. Mater., 173 (2010) 544-551.
[22] D.P. Haaland, Experimental Design in Biotechnology, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New
York, Basel, 1989.
[23] M.M. W. Bahnemann, M.M. Haque, Titanium dioxide-mediated photocatalysed
degradation of few selected organic pollutants in aqueous suspensions, Catal. Today
124 (2007) 133-148. .
[24] N. Daneshvar, D. Salari, A.R. Khataee, Photocatalytic degradation of azo dye
acid red 14 in water: investigation of the effect of operational parameters, J.
Photochem. Photobiol. A, 157 (2003) 111-116.
[25] A.E. Cassano, O.M. Alfano, Reaction engineering of suspended solid
heterogeneous photocatalytic reactors, Catal. Today, 58 (2000) 167-197.
[26] M.F.J. Dijkstraa, H.J. Pannemana, J.G.M. Winkelmana, J.J. Kellyb, A.A.C.M.
Beenackers, Modeling the photocatalytic degradation of formic acid in a reactor with
immobilized catalyst, Chem. Eng. Sci., 57 (2002) 4895-4907.
[27] K. Mehrotra, G.S. Yablonsky, A.K. Ray, Macro kinetic studies for photocatalytic
degradation of benzoic acid in immobilized systems, Chemosphere 60 (2005) 1427-
1436.
[28] D.T. N.A. Laoufi, F. Bentahar, The degradation of phenol in water solution by
TiO2 photocatalysis in a helical reactor, , Global Nest Journal, 10 (2008) 404-418.
[29] M.T. S. Mozia, A.W. Morawski, Photodegradation of azo dye Acid Red 18 in a
quartz labyrinth flow reactor with immobilized TiO2 bed, Dyes Pigments, 75 (2007)
60-66.
[30] P.S. Panesar, Application of Response Surface Methodology in the
Permeabilisation of Yeast Cells for Lactose Hydrolysis, Biochem. Eng. J., 39 (2008)
91-96.
[31] A.R. Khataee, M.N. Pons, O. Zahraa, Photocatalytic degradation of three azo
dyes using immobilized TiO2 nanoparticles on glass plates activated by UV light
irradiation: Influence of dye molecular structure, J. Hazard. Mater., 168 (2009) 451-
457.
17
Figure captions
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy images of TiO2 nanoparticles (a) before and
(b) after deposition on ceramic plates.
Figure 2. Comparison of the experimental results of photooxidative destruction
efficiency with those calculated via central composite design resulted equation.
Figure 3. The response surface and contour plots of photocatalytic decolorization
efficiency (%) as the function of initial dye concentration (mg/L) and reaction time
(min).
Figure 4. The response surface and contour plots of photocatalytic decolorization
efficiency (%) as the function of reaction time (min) and UV light intensity (W/m2).
Figure 5. The response surface and contour plots of photocatalytic decolorization
efficiency (%) as the function of flow rate (mL/min) and reaction time (min).
Figure 6. COD changes during photocatalytic degradation of RG19 at the optimized
conditions.
Figure 7. The changes in the absorption spectra of RG19 during the photocatalytic
process at different irradiation times under the optimized conditions.
.
18
Figures
(a)
(b)
Figure 1
19
y = 0.9995x + 0.0882R2 = 0.97
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
CR (%) Predicted
CR
(%) E
xper
imen
tal
Figure 2
20
Figure 3
21
Figure 4
22
Figure 5
23
050
100150200250300350400450
CO
D (m
g/L)
0 180 300 420 540
Time (min)
Figure 6
24
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Wavelength (nm)
Abs
orba
nce
0 h
12 h
Figure 7
25
Tables
Table 1. Structure and characteristics of RG19.
Color indexname C.I. Rective Green 19 (RG19)
Chemicalstructure
Chemicalclass Anionic, Diazo
Molecularformula C40H23Cl2N15O19S6.6Na
Color indexnumber 68110-31-6
λmax (nm) 630
Mw (g/mol) 1418.92
26
Table 2. Experimental ranges and levels of the independent test variables.
Variables Ranges and levels
–2 –1 0 +1 +2Initial dye concentration (mg/L) (X1)UV light intensity (W/m2) (X2)Flow rate (mL/min) (X3)Reaction time (min) (X4)
212.25040
620.9510090
1029.70150140
1438.45200190
1847.20250240
27
Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for fit of decolorization efficiency from centralcomposite design.
Source ofvariations
Sum ofsquares
Degree offreedom
AdjustedMean square F–value
RegressionResidualsTotal
5649.44270.04
5919.48
1416
403.5316.88
23.91
R2= 0.97, Adj–R2= 0.91
28
Table 4. Estimated regression coefficients and corresponding t and P values from thedata of central composite design experiments.
Coefficient Parameterestimate
Standarderror
t–value P–value
b0b1b2b3b4b12b13b14b23b24b34b11b22b33b44
42.005–9.6813.8801.8359.0244.482
–0.561–1.128–0.8063.591
–1.968–0.5430.3810.301
–1.163
1.5520.8380.8380.8380.8380.7680.7680.7680.7681.0271.0271.0271.0271.0271.027
27.052–11.545
4.6282.189
10.7615.835–0.730–1.469–1.0493.497
–1.917–0.5290.3710.293
–1.133
0.0000.0000.0000.0440.0000.0000.4760.1610.3100.0030.0730.6040.7150.7730.274
29
Table 5. Optimum operating conditions of the process variables.
Variable Optimum valueRG19
Initial dye concentration (mg/L) (X1)UV light intensity (W/m2) (X2)Flow rate (mL/min) (X3)Reaction time (min) (X4)Experimental CR(%)Predicted CR(%)
1047.2150240
69.3670.35