Opportunities in Asset Management
-
date post
19-Oct-2014 -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
467 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Opportunities in Asset Management
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
MSF Enterprises, LLC
OPPORTUNITIES IN
ASSET MANAGEMENT
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Table of Contents
Section Page
Introduction 3
Global Capital Markets 4-12
Evolving Asset Management Industry 13-19
Deal Activity 20-27
2
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Introduction
3
The financial services landscape has been growing substantially since 2008 as wealth management firms, mutual funds, ETFs and alternative investment groups have rallied and returned to pre-financial crisis asset levels. The businesses themselves have become stronger, with better product diversification and improved management teams. Now the industry is in a cyclical pattern where scale, breadth and vision will be the critical factors over the next five years that decide which firms become the next industry bellwethers. Currently, there are 66 publicly-traded asset management firms globally. The largest firms top out in the trillions and scale down to $20B+ in AUM. We suspect that over the next decade we will see the number of publicly-traded firms triple as many larger private firms ($20B+) move toward public structures to create higher valuations and provide succession planning for their managing members. Scale is becoming the most important factor for long-term success in the financial services industry. Money managers not only have to generate returns for their investors, they are now expected to grow and increase the value of the business itself. Necessary components of growing an asset management business include developing new products, designing investment structures to suit a range of investor needs and expanding the firm’s global distribution network. By placing greater emphasis on developing the business as a whole, asset management firms can uniquely position themselves to create long-term value. With that said, firms can no longer be content with reaching $1B in AUM - “$10B and beyond” is the new hurdle to become a major player in the industry.
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Global Capital Markets
4
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Size of the Global Financial Market
5 Source: McKinsey Institute, BCG
$225 Trillion: Size of Global
Financial Markets
Global AUM (in $T)
$58 Trillion: Size of Global
Market for Managed Assets
Global Stock of Debt and Equity Outstanding ($ trillion, end of period, constant 2011 exchange rates)
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
US Europe
South America
South Africa
Asia MENA
SE Asia
Russia
Australia
Fund sponsors globally catering to an investor base of public and private pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, endowments, foundations, banks, family offices and retail clients are now looking for more cross-border opportunities. Firms from the US, Canada, Europe, MENA, Japan, Asia-Pacific and South America are now in play to create the next global asset management firm.
Looking at the World
6
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Largest Global Money Managers
7
Rank Asset Management Company Country AUM (US$bn)
1 BlackRock Inc. US $3,791.59
2 Vanguard Group US $2,215.22
3 State Street Global Advisors US $2,086.20
4 Fidelity Investments US $1,888.30
5 PIMCO US $1,624.35
6 JP Morgan Asset Management US $1,426.40
7 BNY Mellon Asset Management US $1,385.86
8 Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management Germany $1,244.44
9 Prudential Financial US $1,060.25
10 Capital Research & Management Co. US $1,045.57
11 Amundi France $959.79
12 Goldman Sachs Group US $854.00
13 Franklin Templeton Investments US $781.77
14 Northern Trust US $758.94
15 Wellington Management Co. US $757.73
Source: Pensions & Investments
*Rankings as of 12/31/2012
$33 Trillion: Approximate Size
of 25 Largest Asset Managers
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright 2011 MSF Enterprises, LLC
8
Top 20 Hedge Fund Managers: Past and Present
1 Bridgewater Associates $83,300
2 JPMorgan Asset Mgmt $54,800
3 Brevan Howard Asset Mgmt $40,000
4 BlueCrest Capital Mgmt $35,300
5 Och-Ziff Capital Mgmt $31,900
6 Man Group $29,600
7 Baupost Group $26,700
8 BlackRock $26,635
9 Winton Capital Mgmt $25,700
10 D.E. Shaw & Co. $23,400
11 Lone Pine Capital $22,000
11 Renaissance Technologies $22,000
13 Elliott Mgmt Corp $21,500
14 AQR Capital Mgmt $20,300
15 Credit Suisse Hedging-Griffo $19,985
15 GAM $19,600
17 Viking Global Investors $19,400
18 Davidson Kempner Capital Mgmt
$18,590
19 Farallon Capital Mgmt $18,400
20 Adage Capital Mgmt $18,360
1 JPMorgan Asset Mgmt $33,087
2 Goldman Sachs Asset Mgmt $32,531
3 Bridgewater Associates $30,210
4 D.E. Shaw Group $27,300
5 Farallon Capital $26,200
6 Renaissance Technologies $26,000
7 Och-Ziff Capital Mgmt $21,000
8 Barclays Global Investors $18,953
9 Man Investments $18,800
10 ESL Investments $17,500
11 GLG Partners $15,833
12 Tudor Investment Corp. $14,850
13 Citigroup Alternative Inv. $14,081
14 Lansdowne Partners $14,000
15 Campbell & Co. $13,600
16 Atticus Capital $13,500
17 Caxton Associates $13,500
18 Citadel Investment Group $13,400
19 Cerebrus Capital Mgmt $12,800
20 Moore Capital Mgmt $12,500
1 Moore Capital Mgmt $8,000
2 Farallon Capital $7,794
3 Andor Capital Mgmt $7,500
4 Maverick Capital $7,500
5 Citadel Investment Group $7,150
6 Angelo, Gordon & Co. $7,000
7 Soros Fund Mgmt $7,000
8 Pequot Capital Mgmt $6,500
9 Och-Ziff Capital Mgmt $6,050
10 Renaissance Technologies $5,570
11 Caxton Corp. $5,500
12 HBK Investments $5,491
13 Chilton Investment Co. $5,000
14 Duquesne Capital Mgmt $5,000
15 ESL Investments $5,000
16 Highfields Capital Mgmt $5,000
17 Tudor Investment Corp. $4,946
18 Highbridge Capital Mgmt $4,200
19 Perry Capital $4,137
20 Man Investments $4,000
2001 2006 2013
Rank Firm AUM [$M] Rank Firm AUM [$M] Rank Firm AUM [$M]
Source: Institutional Investor, Bloomberg Markets
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
$37.9B: Combined AUM of Top 5 Hedge Fund Managers in 2001
$245.3B: Combined AUM of Top 5 Hedge Fund Managers in 2013
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Global Equity and Bond Markets
9
Source: World Federation of Exchanges, Morgan Stanley, Bank for International Settlements, Thomson Reuters, Barclay’s Capital
Size of US IG and HY Corporate Bond Markets
Regional Distribution and Total Market Capitalization of Global Bond Market
$99.5 Trillion: Size of Global Bond Market
$54.6 Trillion: Size of Global Equity Market
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Alternative Asset Classes
10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Trill
ion
s o
f U
SD
Size of Global Alternatives Market
Source: McKinsey Institute, Managed Funds Association
CAGR 2005-2011 Alternative Assets: 14.2% Traditional Assets: 1.9%
$6.5 Trillion: Size of Global Alternatives
Market
$2.3 Trillion: Size of Global Hedge Fund
Market
Estimate of Hedge Fund Assets, Net Asset Flows and Number of Funds
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Alternative Asset Classes
11
Private Equity Assets Under Management
Private Equity AUM by Fund Type (as of 9/2012)
$3.3 Trillion: Size of Global Private Equity
Market
Source: Preqin
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Registered Investment Companies (RICs)
12
Total Assets in Mutual Funds, Closed-End Funds, ETFs and UITs
Private Equity AUM by Fund Type (as of 9/2012)
$14.7 Trillion: Size of Global Retail Market
Structures
Closed-End
Mutual funds1Funds ETFs2
UITs Total3
1995 $2,811 $143 $1 $73 $3,028
1996 3,526 147 2 72 3,747
1997 4,468 152 7 85 4,712
1998 5,525 156 16 94 5,790
1999 6,846 147 34 92 7,119
2000 6,965 143 66 74 7,247
2001 6,975 141 83 49 7,248
2002 6,383 159 102 36 6,680
2003 7,402 214 151 36 7,803
2004 8,095 253 228 37 8,613
2005 8,891 276 301 41 9,509
2006 10,398 297 423 50 11,167
2007 12,001 312 608 53 12,975
2008 9,604 184 531 29 10,348
2009 11,113 224 777 38 12,152
2010 11,832 238 992 51 13,113
2011 11,627 243 1,048 60 12,979
2012 13,045 265 1,337 72 14,719
3 Total investment company assets include mutual fund holdings of closed-end funds and ETFs.
2 ETF data prior to 2001 were provided by Strategic Insight Simfund. ETF data include investment companies not registered
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and exclude ETFs that invest primarily in other ETFs.
1 Mutual fund data include only mutual funds that report statistical information to the Investment Company Institute. The
data do not include mutual funds that invest primarily in other mutual funds.
*Source: Investment Company Institute, Strategic Insight Simfund
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
The Evolving Asset Management Industry
13
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
14
60 Year History of Asset Management
The complex art form of investment management has been evolving for decades, with market developments forcing investors to seek out alternative methods to achieve outperformance.
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Correlation: Expanding Asset Classes
15
The Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) asset base of bonds and equities has only limited diversification benefits, particularly given that correlations increase during crisis periods.
Asset Class Correlations from 2004 to 2006 (2007 to 2008 in Parenthesis)
Traditional MPT Assets
Endowment Asset Types (Alternatives))
Increasing the number of asset classes and diversifying investment strategies can reduce portfolio correlation and volatility…
*Source: Szado (2009)
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Endowment v. Traditional Model
16
Risk/Return Profile for portfolio with 100% Traditional Assets to 100% Alternative Assets
(June 2001-December 2011)
Portfolio drawdowns under the Endowment Model are typically lower in magnitude than drawdowns from traditional asset allocation models. This reduced market sensitivity generally enables alternative asset strategies to outperform traditional strategies over the long-run.
*Endowment performance includes Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Stanford, with fiscal year ending June
**60-40 allocation composed of 60% SPX and 40% Lehman Brothers/Barclays Aggregate Bond Index, with annual rebalancing
The New Efficient Frontier
50% Hedge Funds 50% Managed Futures
45% Hedge Funds 45% Managed Futures 5% Stocks 5% Bonds
50% Stocks 50% Bonds
Jun-99 Jun-01 Jun-03 Jun-05 Jun-07 Jun-09 Jun-11
*Source: NACUBO-Commonfund, Yahoo! Finance
Indexed Performance Comparison: Endowments v. S&P 500 v 60/40 Allocation
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
The Endowment Model
17
• The Endowment Model uses every investable asset class to achieve full diversification through non-directional alternative strategies
• Utilize alternative assets with low expected correlation to the market
– Private Equity Firms—
• Buyouts of established firms with the long-term goal of generating returns from leverage and increases in operating efficiency; PE may provide limited diversification over equities due to common fundamental links between the asset classes
– Venture Capital Groups—
• Early stage investments that seek to capitalize on high growth opportunities, while taking on greater risk due to operating uncertainty and longer investment horizons
– Hedge Funds—
• Range of strategies that seek to take advantage of special opportunities and exploit inefficiencies in the market, often with the goal of producing absolute returns
– Real Assets—
• Investments with high correlation to inflation that often produce a high current yield, including real estate, natural resources, TIPS and other commodities
Endowment Model Advantages Potential Setbacks
Increased Diversification Difficult to Access Strategies
Reduced Volatility High Cost of Execution
Reduced Drawdowns Lack of Liquidity
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
18
Endowment Model Allocation
Endowment Models Feature a 20-60% Allocation to Alternatives
Domestic Equities
12%
Fixed Income 9%
International Equities
16%
Alternative Strategies
60%
Cash & Equivalents
3%
$1B+ Endowments
Domestic Equities
32%
Fixed Income
20% International
Equities 18%
Alternative Strategies
23%
Cash & Equivalents
7%
$50-100MM Endowments
Larger endowments allocate a greater portion of their assets to alternative strategies, yet smaller funds can still benefit from an allocation to alternatives even when the strategy is executed on a smaller scale
Asset Allocations for Fiscal 2011
*Source: NACUBO-Commonfund
Alternative Allocation for Top Endowments: • Absolute Return 20% • Private Equity 15% • Real Assets 25%
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Asset Flows and Investor Allocation
19
Asset Management Industry Average Net Flows (% of AUM)
Shifts in Investor Allocation Over Time
Investors have steadily reduced allocations to traditional asset classes (“active core”) while dedicating more capital to alternatives and passive investments
Source: BCG
The asset management industry has experienced a sharp drop in net flows since 2007
At the same time, certain asset classes have demonstrated resilient growth as investors shift allocations
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Deal Activity
20
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Asset Management Transaction Environment
21
Total Number of Transactions and Acquired AUM
Asset Management Deals in 2012
Asset Management Transactions 143
Aggregate Disclosed Deal Value $8.5B
Aggregate AUM Transacted $1.5T
IPOs 2
Total Number of Public Asset Managers 66
MBOs & PE Sponsored Transactions 29
Minority Stake Transactions 37
Cross-Border Transactions 44
Alternative Manager Sales 48
Median Forward P/E Multiple (Publicly Traded Managers in U.S.) 14.5x
Median Run-Rate EBITDA Multiple (Global Private Transactions) 8.8x
Source: Sandler O’Neill
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Asset Management Industry Multiples
22 Source: Sandler O’Neill, Freeman & Co.
Traditional Firms: Artio, BlackRock, Calamos, Cohen & Steers, Eaton Vance, Federated Investors, Franklin Resources, GAMCO, Invesco, Janus, Legg Mason, Manning & Napier, Pzena, Schroders, SEI Investments, T. Rowe Price, Waddell & Reed, Virtus
Alternative Firms: Apollo, Ashmore, Blackstone, Carlyle, Charlemagne, Fortress, KKR, Man Group, Oaktree, Och-Ziff, Partners Group, Polar Capital
LTM P/E
1-Year
Forward P/E
EV / LTM
EBITDA
EV / Forward
EBITDA
2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012
U.S. Traditional Asset Managers 12.4x 15.6x 12.1x 14.5x 6.1x 8.3x 6.1x 7.8x
U.S. Alternative Asset Managers 12.1x 9.5x 6.4x 7.7x 10.7x 9.8x 5.4x 7.0x
U.K. Traditional Asset Managers 11.0x 14.7x 10.9x 12.0x 6.2x 8.4x 5.8x 7.2x
U.K. Alternative Asset Managers 14.8x 15.6x 12.8x 13.0x 7.9x 8.6x 7.4x 6.9x
Median Trading Multiples for Quoted Fund Managers
Asset Manager EBITDA Multiple: Range and Average Over Time
Traditional Firms – EV to LTM EBITDA Alternative Firms – EV to LTM EBITDA
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Asset Management Deal Volume Transactions AUM by Type
• M&A for Alternative Asset Managers has not yet returned to pre-recession levels
• M&A for Funds of Hedge Funds and Private Equity Firms showed strength in 2012
• In terms of transacted AUM, 2012 volume was more than 60% below the 2009 peak
• While down from recession and pre-recession levels, transacted AUM is up over 50% from 2010
Source: Sandler O’Neill 23
Alternative Asset Manager Transaction Activity
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
M&A: Looking Forward
24 Source: Freeman & Co.
After increasing 22% in 2012, asset management M&A activity is on track to rise another 12% in 2013
29 transactions have closed in the U.S. in 2013 (as of 4/30) 26% increase from same period 2012
•Alternatives
•Global and International Strategies
•Passive Investments
•Retail Alternatives
•Solutions
Asset Management Growth Areas
Global Asset Management Transactions (as of 4/30/13)
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Effects on Valuation
25
Start 2013
Firm AUM $15,000.00
Average Fees 1.50%
Revenue $225.00
Expenses $144.00
EBITDA $81.00
Margin 36%
Multiple (x) 8.3
EV $672.30
Current
Worse Case Down Side
Cumulative Change
$9,000.00 -40%
1.50%
$135.00 -40%
$86.40 -40%
#DIV/0!
$48.60 -40%
36%
6.5 -21.7%
$315.90 -53%
Downside
Growth Goal Cumulative
Change
$13,000.00 -13.3%
1.50%
$195.00 -13.3%
$124.80 -13.3%
#DIV/0!
$70.20 -13.3%
36%
7.5 -9.6%
$526.50 -21.7%
Recovery
Assumptions • Asset manager with $15B in AUM experiences 40% decline in asset value • Expected EBITDA multiple declines as a result of the drawdown, reducing valuation by 65% • Even with AUM rebounding back to $13B, the business valuations remains 30% below pre-
drawdown levels
Key Takeaway: Several Factors Determine Valuation • AUM
• Stability and diversification of capital sources • Fee structure • EBITDA and EBITDA Margin • Valuation Multiple
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
Publicly Traded Managers: Performance and Valuation
26
Relative Performance of Asset Management Firms
Source: Freeman & Co.
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
27
Enterprise Value
Fund Performance
Distribution Operational
Efficiency
Firm Structure
Manufacturing
Building Firm Value Asset Management firms should focus more on utilizing
fundamental business principles as a guide for operations
• Product Manufacturing • Provide strategies and structures that meet the needs of a wide range of investors • Consider capacity constraints • Separately managed accounts, pooled investment vehicles, ‘40 Act products
• Operations • Efficiency of operational structure • Leveragability of systems and personnel
• Distribution • Investors by type and geography • Scalability
GOALS: Develop Distribution Channels, Grow AUM, Improve EBITDA, Expand Valuation Multiples
Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC Copyright © 2013 MSF Enterprises, LLC
DISCLAIMER: Securities are offered through Silver Leaf Partners, a member of FINRA, NFA, & SIPC. This communication is for informational purposes only. The information above is not guaranteed as to its accuracy or completeness. If such information is related to a security or product then you are further advised that we do not provide investment counsel thereon nor do we certify such information as complete or accurate. To determine suitability, you must secure, read & understood all relevant information related thereto, conduct a thorough due diligence & seek expert independent counsel, if necessary, prior to investing. We further caution that past performance is not indicative of future results.
This communication is confidential & may not be disclosed without permission. If this email is not intended for you, then you have received it in error & you may not distribute or copy it; please let us know of our error by reply email & delete this message & all of its attachments. Every effort is made to keep our network virus free; we have no liability for any damage caused by this transmission.
M i c h a e l F i e l d s (303) 847-4649
M S F E n t e r p r i s e s , L L C 717 17th St., Suite 2160
Denver, CO 80202
Contact
28
If you would like more information on ways to take advantage of opportunities in the asset management industry, please contact: