Opn Research by Prof Narang

download Opn Research by Prof Narang

of 43

Transcript of Opn Research by Prof Narang

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    1/43

    Role Of Operations

    Research

    In

    Managerial DecisionMaking

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    2/43

    Management ScienceOperations ResearchOperational Research

    Operations Analysis

    It is sometimes believed that operationsresearch refers to constant monitoring of anorganization's ongoing activities such asproduction scheduling and inventory control,facility maintenance and repair, staffing of service facilities etc.

    Whereas many management science studies treatother kind of decisions that bear on daily operationsonly indirectly. These studies usually have planningorientation. For example determining the breadth of a firms product line, developing a long term plan

    for plant expansion, designing a network of warehouses for a wholesale distribution system,entering a new business by merger or acquisition

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    3/43

    Some Definitions Of

    Operations Research1. O.R.Deals with systematic and

    scientific research on the operationsof a system .(Mccloskey andTrefethen)

    2. O.R. Is the application of scientificmethods, techniques, and tools toproblems involving the operations of asystem so as to provide those incontrol of the system with optimumsolution to the problem.(Churchmann,Ackoff and Arnoff).

    3. O.R. Is a scientific approach toproblem solving for executivemanagement. (H.M.Wagner).

    4. O.R. Is the art of giving bad answersto problems to which worst answerare sought otherwise. (T.L.Saaty).

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    4/43

    Major O.R.Techniques

    1. Linear Programming2. Transportation Models

    3. Assignment Models4. Other Mathematical Programming

    Techniques Like Goal, Integer,Dynamic Etc

    5. Network Techniques LikePERT/CPM Etc.

    6. Queuing Theory7. Inventory Management8. Simulation

    9. Markov Chains10. Game Theory

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    5/43

    Characteristics Of O.R.

    1. Inter-disciplinary Team Approach

    2. Holistic Approach To The System

    3. Focus On Decision Making

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    6/43

    Phases Of An O.R. Study

    1. Identifying The Problem

    2. Building A Model

    3. Finding The Solution

    4. Testing The Model And TheSolution

    5. Establishing Control Limits

    6. Implementation

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    7/43

    Areas Of Applications OfOperations Research

    (Schumacher-Smith Survey)

    Forecasting 73Production Scheduling 90Inventory Control 90Quality Control 51Transportation 54

    Advertising And Sales Research 27Maintenance And Repairs 32Accounting Procedures 17Plant Location 32Equipment Replacement 27Packaging 7

    Capital Budgeting 39

    Percent Of

    Companies Area Of ApplicationReporting

    Activities

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    8/43

    Frequency Of Use

    ool/Tech Never Moderate Frequent

    atistical Analysis 20 30 75

    omputer Simulation 16 57 52ERT/CPM 22 45 58

    ventory Mgt. Techniques 22 39 64

    inear Programming 30 47 48

    ueuing Theory 46 46 33

    on-linear Programming 68 39 18

    ynamic Programming 62 37 26

    ame Theory 64 37 24

    (No. Of Companies)

    Source:- An Unpublished MBA (Part Time )Project, 1999.

    Usage Of OR Techniques Among 125 Companies

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    9/43

    Operations Research Software Available

    Bernard W.Taylor, Management Science, Prentice-Hall,Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (Contains AB:QM 4.0 By Sang Lee), 1996.

    Hamdy A.Taha, Operations Research : An Introduction,Prentice-Hall Of India, New Delhi, (Contains Tora AndSimmnetI1),1995.

    Sang M.Lee and Jung P.Shim, Micro ManagementScience, Allyn and Bacon, (Contains Micro Manager

    Version2.0),1990.

    Yih-long Chang, Quantitative Systems (QS) Version 3.0,Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1995.

    Yih-long Chang, Quantitative Systems For Business Plus

    (QSB+) Version 3.0, Prentice-Hall, Inc., EnglewoodCliffs,NewJersey,1994.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    10/43

    enerationTimerame

    Description

    rst/ 930s-940s

    Emphasized The Applications Of The Scientific MethodsTo Problems Involving Operations Of Systems. OR TeamsWere Interdisciplinary And Addressed Complex Problems.

    econd / 950s

    Emphasized Mathematical/Optimization Techniques.Scientific Methods Still Employed And Computers BeganTo Be Integrated Into Tool Box.

    hird/ 960s

    Those Who Emphasized Heuristics Programming And Ai-based Methodology Separated From OR, Thus CreatingTwo Approaches To Satisficing. Multiple ObjectiveOptimization And Goal Programming Reflected TheChange In OR. OR Associated With Quantitative; AI WithQualitative.

    ourth/ 970s-resent

    DSS And ES Methodologies Symbolize This Generation. ESWere Developed By AI In Response To Difficulties It HadEncountered; DSS By MS/OR. Decision Maker In BothCases Becoming More Involved.

    fth/?

    There Is Now A Realization That To Solve A Larger Set Of Real -World "problems, And So Make A SignificantImpact On Decision Making Technology, One Needs ToEmploy A Much Larger Combination Of Techniques AndTools, Dependent Upon The Situation. Artificial BarriersAnd Constraints Of The Discipline; Should Not BeInhibiting.

    The Five Generations Of OR

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    11/43

    ORS FORMULATION APPLIED SCIENTIFIC

    METHOD TO PROBLEMSINVOLVING OPERATIONS

    OF COMPLEX SYESTEMS(CS)

    ATTEMPTED TO USEMATHEMATICAL/ OPTIMIZATION

    TECHNIQUES TO SOLVEPROBLEMS INVOLVING

    OPERATIONS OF CS

    QUANTITATIVE METHODOLOGYAPPLIED TO SOME SUBSETOF PROBLEMS INVOLVING

    OPERATIONS OF CS

    FIRST GENERATION

    SYNERGY OF ALL SCHOOLS OFTHOUGHT

    QUANTITATIVE QUALITATIVE

    CLASSICAL OR AI

    MS/OR/DSS AI/ES

    OTHER RELEVANT PARADIGMS

    DSS DEVELOPED IN

    RESPONSE TO THE LIMITEDSUCCESS ACHIEVED BYTHE

    PREVIOUS GENERATION

    QUALITATIVE METHODOLOGYAPPLIED TO LARGE CLASS OF

    PROBLEMS(GENERAL PROBLEMSOLVERS-GPS)

    ES DEVELOPED IN RESPONSETO THE LACK OF SUCCESS INCREATING GPS IN

    PREVIOUS GENERATION

    CLASSICAL OR

    THIRD GENERATION

    EARLY OR

    SECOND GENERATION

    THE FIVE GENERATIONS OF OR

    MS/OR

    FOURTH GENERATION

    SOR(SYNERGISTICOR)

    FIFTH GENERATION

    ( 1930s-1940

    ( 1950

    ( 1970s)-PRESEN

    AI/E

    ( 196

    AI

    (?)

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    12/43

    Some Definitions Of LinearProgramming

    1. A Method To Allocate Limited Resources InAn Optimal Manner So As To Satisfy TheLaws Of Supply And Demand For The FirmsProducts.

    2. A Method To Optimize A Linear FunctionSubject To Set Of Linear Constraints.

    3. Yet Another Class Of OptimizationTechniques.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    13/43

    Janata fertilizers uses nitrates, phosphates,potash and an inert filler material for fertilizermanufacture. The firm mixes these fouringredients to make two basic fertilizers, 5-10-5and 6-5-10 (nos. represent % wt. Of nitrates,

    phosphates and potash in each tonne of fertilizers). The contribution towards profitsand overheads is Rs.300 and Rs.400 per tonnefor (5-10-5) and (6-5-10) respectively. The firmhas 120 tonnes of nitrates ,200 tonnes of

    phosphates, 150 tonnes of potash and unlimitedfiller material. They will not receive additionalchemicals until next month. They believe thatthey can sell or store at negligible cost allfertilizer produced during the month.

    Determine optimal product mix.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    14/43

    Ing.A Ing.B

    Cost/kg. Rs.10 Rs.40

    Fiber content 25% 75%

    Fat content 20% 10%

    A state agricultural federation manufacturesand markets cattle feed. It uses two ingredientswhich have the following characteristics

    Specifications are that fiber content should beat least 50% and fat content should not exceed18% in every one kg. Of the feed. Whatamounts of A and B should be used so thatcost/kg. is minimized?

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    15/43

    PROBLEM-I

    5-10-5 6-5-10 Available

    NITRATES 5% 6% 120 TONNES

    PHOSPHATES 10% 5% 200 TONNES

    POTASH 5% 10% 150 TONNES

    CONTRIBUTION Rs.300 Rs.400Per Tonne

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    16/43

    Problem-2

    Ing.A Ing.B

    Cost/Kg. Rs.10 Rs.40

    Fiber 25% 75%

    Fat 20% 10%

    Required

    Fiber Content At least 50%Fat Content - Not More Then 18%

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    17/43

    A MEDIA PLANNING PROBLEM

    EXPOSURE RATESTA TB

    MAGAZINE 2% 1%(Rs.80,000)

    TV COMMERCIAL 1% 3%(Rs.3,20,000)

    MINIMAL EXPOSURE 50% 30%

    A PRODUCT MIX PROBLEM

    A COSTS RS.150/- PER PAIRB COSTS RS.100/- PER PAIR

    BUYER WANTS:-

    1. EXACTLY 5000 PAIRS2. NOT MORE THAN 2000 PAIRS OF A3. FOR EVERY ONE PAIR OF A NOT MORE

    THAN TWO PAIRS OF BOBJECTIVE: MINIMIZE THE COSTS

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    18/43

    A Product Mix Problem

    Cont/Pair Rs 150 Rs.100

    HIKING BOOTS SKING BOOTS AVAILABLEEWING 2 3 13 HOURTRETCHING 5 2 16 HOURS

    SOLUTION :- HB-2, SB-3TC = Rs 600.

    Another Product Mix Problem

    Cont/Pair Rs.100 Rs.150

    A( moccasin) B (derby)

    Cutting & 100 Or 150Upper Closing

    Lasting 50 Or 200

    Sole Adhesion 250 Or 125

    Solution :- A - 21.42857B - 114.2857TC Rs 19285.71

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    19/43

    PRODUCTS MATERIALS CONT/UNITA B C

    P1 1 2 3 Rs.3P

    2 2 1 1 Rs.4

    P3 3 2 1 Rs.5AVAILABLE 10 12 15

    PRIMAL PROBLEMMAX Z = 3X 1+4X 2+5X 3

    X1+2X 2+3X 3< 102X 1+X 2+2X 3< 123X 1+X 2+X 3< 15X1, X 2, X 3 > 0

    SV CONT Q 3 4 5 0 0 0

    COEFF. X 1 X2 X3 S1 S2S2 0 1 0 0 4/5 -1/5 1 -3/X1 3 4 1 0 -1/5 -1/5 0 2/X2 4 3 0 1 8/5 3/5 0 -1

    OC -4/5 -9/5 -2

    DUAL PROBLEMMm Z* = 10Y 1+12Y 2+15Y 3

    Y1+2Y 2+3Y 3 > 32Y 1+Y 2+Y 3 > 43Y 1+2Y 2+Y 3 > 5Y1, Y 2,Y 3 > 0

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    20/43

    SV COST Q 10 12 15 0 0 0COEFF. Y 1 Y2 Y3 S1 S2

    Y3 15 2/5 0 3/5 1 -2/5 1/5 0S3 0 4/5 0 -4/5 0 1/5 -8/5 1Y1 10 9/5 1 1/5 0 1/5 -3/5 0

    OC 1 4 3

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    21/43

    Applications Of Linear Programming InProduction Management

    1. Product Mix

    2 Production Smoothing

    3. Assembly Line Balancing

    4. Sub Contracting

    5. Some Purchasing Decisions6. Location Of Production Facilities

    Applications Of Linear Programming InMarketing Management

    1. Media Planning

    2. Routing Of Salesmen

    3. Physical Distribution

    4. Warehousing Decisions

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    22/43

    APPLICATIONS OF LINEAR PRORAMMINGIN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

    1. Capital Budgeting

    2. Financing Decisions

    3. Portfolio Selection4. Profit Planning

    5. Financial Audit

    Applications Of Linear Programming

    In Personnel Management1. Job Assignment

    2. Manpower Scheduling

    3. Manpower Planning

    4. Equitable Salaries

    5. Manpower Deployment

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    23/43

    Limitations Of Linear Programming

    1. Linearity

    2. Additivity

    3. Continuity

    4. Certainty

    5. Single Objective

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    24/43

    A TOOTHPICK MANUFACTURER MAKES TWO KINDS OFTOOTHPICKS: ROUNDS AND FLATS. MAJOR PRODUCTIONFACILITIES INVOLVED ARE CUTTING AND PACKING. THECUTTING DEPARTMENT CAN PROCESS 300 BOXES OF ROUNDSOR 600 BOXES FLATS PER HOUR. THE PACKING DEPARTMENTCAN PACKAGE 600 BOXES OF ROUNDS OR 300 BOXES OFFLATS PER HOUR.

    IF THE CONTRIBUTION OF PROFIT FOR A BOX OF ROUNDSIS EXACTLY SAME AS THAT FOR A BOX OF FLATS, WHAT ISTHE OPTIMUM PRODUCTION LEVEL?

    UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES WOULD THEMANUFACTURER BE BETTER OFF TO PRODUCE ONLYROUNDS?

    A TRUCKING FIRM HAS RECEIVED AN ORDER TO MOVE 3,000TONNES OF INDUSTRIAL MATERIAL TO A DESTINATION 1,000KM. AWAY. THE FIRM HAS AVAILABLE AT THE MOMENT AFLEET OF 150 CLASS A 15 TONNE TRAILER TRUCKS ANDANOTHER FLEET OF 100 CLASS B 10 TONNE TRAILER TRUCKS.THE OPERATING COSTS OF THESE TRUCKS ARE RS. 3 AND RS.4 PER TONNE KM RESPECTIVELY. BASED ON PASTEXPERIENCE, THE FIRM HAS A POLICY OF RETAINING ATLEAST ONE CLASS-A TRUCK WITH EVERY TWO CLASS-BTRUCKS IN RESERVE. IT DESIRES TO KNOW HOW MANY OF

    THE TWO CLASSES OF VEHICLES SHOULD BE DISPATCHEDTO MOVE THE MATERIALS AT MINIMAL OPERATING COSTS.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    25/43

    A FARMER HAS A 100- HECTARE FARM. HE CANSELL ALL THE TOMATOES, LETTUCE, OR RADISHESHE CAN RAISE. THE PRICE HE CAN OBTAIN IS RE.1PER KILOGRAM FOR TOMATOES, RE. 0.75 A HEADFOR LETTUCE AND RS. 2 PER KILOGRAM FORRADISHES. THE AVERAGE YIELD PER HECTARE IS2,000 KILOGRAM OF TOMATOES, 3000 HEADS OFLETTUCE AND 1,000 KILOGRAMS OF RADISHES.FERTILIZER IS AVAILABLE AT RE. 0.50 PERKILOGRAM AND THE AMOUNT REQUIRED PERHECTARE IS 100 KILOGRAMS EACH FOR TOMATOESAND LETTUCE AND 50 KILOGRAMS FOR RADISHES.LABOUR REQUIRED FOR SOWING, CULTIVATINGAND HARVESTING PER HECTARE IS 5 MAN-DAYSEACH FOR TOMATOES AND RADISHES AND 6 MAN-DAYS FOR LETTUCE. A TOTAL OF 400 MAN-DAYS OFLABOUR ARE AVAILABLE AT RS.20 PER MAN-DAY.FORMULATE THIS PROBLEM AS A LINEARPROGRAMMING MODEL TO MAXIMIZE THEFARMERS TOTAL PROFIT.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    26/43

    FOUR PRDUCTS HAVE TO BE PROCESSED THROUGHTHE PLANT, THE QUANTITIES REQUIRED FOR THE

    NEXT PRODUCTION PERIOD BEING:PRODUCT 1 2,000 UNITSPRODUCT 2 3,000 UNITSPRODUCT 3 3,000 UNITSPRODUCT 4 6,000 UNITS

    THERE ARE THREE PRODUCTION LINES ON WHICH THEPRODUCTS COULD BE PROCESSED. THE RATES FORPRODUCTION IN UNITS PER DAY AND THE TOTALAVAILABLE CAPACITY IN DAYS ARE GIVEN IN THEFOLLOWING TABLE. THE COST OF USING THE LINES ISRS. 600, RS. 500, RS. 400 PER DAY,RESPECTIVELY,

    ASSIGNMENT OF FOUR PRODUCTS: RATES OFPRODUCTION IN UNITS PER DAY.

    PRODUCTION PRODUCT MAX.LINELINE 1 2 3 4 CAPACITY(DAYS)

    A 150 100 500 400 20B 200 100 760 400 20C 160 80 890 600 18

    FORMULATE THE ABOVE AS A LINEAR PROGRAMMINGPROBLEM TO MINIMIZE THE COST OF PRODUCTION

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    27/43

    PRQ FEED COMPANY MARKETS TWO FEED MIXESFOR CATTLE. THE FIRST MIX, FERTILEX, REQUIRESAT LEAST TWICE AS MUCH WHEAT AS BARLEY. THESECOND MIX, MULTIPLEX REQUIRES AT LEASTTWICE AS MUCH BARELY AS WHEAT. WHEAT COSTSRS.1.50 PER KG. AND ONLY 1,000 KG. ARE AVAILABLE

    THIS MONTH. BARLEY COSTS RS. 1.25 PER KG. AND1200 KG. ARE AVAILABLE. FERTILEX SELLS FORRS.1.80 PER KG. UPTO 99 KG, AND EACH ADDITIONALKG. OVER 99 KG. SELLS FOR RS.1.65. MULTIPLEXSELLS AT RS. 1.70 PER KG. UPTO 99 KG. AND EACHADDITIONAL KG.OVER 99 KG. SELLS FOR RS.1.55.

    BHARAT FARMS WILL BUY ANY AND ALL AMOUNTSOF BOTH MIXES PQR FEED COMPANY WILL MIX. SETUP THE LINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEM TODETERMINE THE PRODUCE MIX THAT RESULTS INMAXIMUM PROFITS .

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    28/43

    A MANUFACTURER HAS CONTRACTED TO PRODUCE 2,000 UNITSOF A PARTICULER PRODUCT OVER THE NEXT EIGHT MONTHS.

    DELIVERIES ARE SCHEDULED AS FOLLOW:JANUARY 100FEBRUARY 200MARCH 300APRIL 400MAY 100JUNE 100JULY 500AUGUST 300

    TOTAL 2,000

    THE MANUFACTURER HAS ESTIMATED THAT IT COSTS HIM RE.1 TO STORE ONE UNIT OF PRODUCT FOR ONE MONTH. HE HAS AWAREHOUSE CAPACITY OF 300 UNITS.

    THE MANUFACTURER CAN PRODUCE ANY NUMBER OF UNITS INA GIVEN MONTH, SINCE THE UNIT CAN BE PRODUCED MOSTLYWITH PART-TIME LABOUR, WHICH CAN BE EASILY OBTAINED.HOWEVER,THERE ARE THE COST OF TRANING NEWPERSONNEL AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH LAYING OFFPERSONNEL WHO HAVE BEEN HIRED. THE MANUFACTURERHAS ESTIMATED THAT IT COSTS APPOXIMATELY 75 PAISE PERUNIT TO INCRESE THE PRODUCTION LEVEL FROM ONE MONTHTO THE NEXT(E.G. IF PRODUCTION IN JANUARY IS 200 AND ISINCREASED TO 300 IN FEBRUARY, THE COST IS RS.75 FORTRANING THE ADDITIONAL PEOPLE REQUIRED TO PRODUCE

    AT THE 300 UNIT LEVEL.)SIMILARLY IT COSTS 50 PAISE PERUNIT TO REDUCE PRODUCTION FROM ONE MONTH TO THENEXT. (AT THE END OF EIGHT MONTHS, ALL EMPLOYEE WILLBE LAID OFF WITH THE CORRESPONDING PRODUCTION-REDUCTION COSTS). ASSUME THE PRODUCTION LEVEL BEFORE

    JANUARY IS ZERO .FORMULATE THE ABOVE AS A LINEAR PROGRAMMINGPROBLEM.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    29/43

    Transportation Models

    There are a number of availabilitycentres such as factories, warehouses etc.With known availabilities.

    There are a number of consumptioncentres such as warehouses, markets etc.With known requirements.

    The distribution cost (freight, handlingcosts etc.) Per unit from an availabilitycentre to a consumption centre is given

    The problem is to find an optimaldistribution plan i.e. how many units

    should be allocated from which availabilitycentre to which consumption centre so thatthe total distribution cost is minimized

    .

    Single commodity

    Direct shipment

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    30/43

    The Assignment Model

    The assignment model is a special type of linear programming problem in which nitems are assigned among n receivers, oneitem to a receiver,such that the total returnresulting from the assignment is optimized.

    The returns associated with eachassignment are assumed to be known andindependent of each other.

    Ex-1 A marketing manager may have foursalesmen and four sales territories. Whichassignment will help in maximizing sales?

    Ex-2 A foreman may have five mechanicsand five jobs, how the assignment shouldbe made so as to minimize the total timetaken for completing the jobs.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    31/43

    AN ASSIGNMENT PROBLEMWORKERS

    I II III IV

    A 16 15 18OBS B 13 16 14

    C 14 13 11D 16 18 17

    A ROUTING PROBLEM

    TO CITYA B C D E

    A - 4 7 4ROM B 4 - 3 4ITY C 7 6 - 7

    D 3 7 - 7E 4 5 7 -

    TO/ FROM D E F G CAPACIT

    A 42 48 38 37 160

    B 40 49 52 51 150

    C 39 38 40 43 190

    REQD. 80 90 110 220 500/500

    160

    10 6080

    80110

    A TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMWAREHOUSES

    14

    12

    3

    5

    12

    15

    6

    34

    ACTORIES

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    32/43

    For Maximization Case

    The numerical value of a given objectivefunction with respect to the integer solutioncan never exceed the numerical value of that objective function with respect to thenon-integer solution.

    For Minimization Case

    The numerical value of a given objectivefunction with respect to the integer solutioncan never be less than the numerical value of that objective function with respect to thenon-integer solution.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    33/43

    The cutting division of the photo filmcorporation requisitions from stock controldepartment plastic films of 85 feet (fixed unitlength) which can be cut according to two

    patterns. First pattern will cut each film lengthinto 35 feet pieces with the remaining 15 feet toscrap. Second pattern will cut each film lengthinto a 35 feet piece and two 25 feet pieces withnothing to scrap. The present order from a

    customer is for 8 pieces of 35 feet length and 6pieces of 25 feet length. What minimum numberof plastic films of 85 feet should be cut to meetcustomer requirement?

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    34/43

    Problems On Integer Linear Programming

    1. The ABC company requires an outputof at least 200 unit of a product per day andto accomplish this target it can buymachine A or B or both. Machine A costsRs.20,000 while machine B costs Rs.15,000and company has a budget of Rs.2,00,000for the same. Machines A and B willproduce 24 and 20 units respectively of thisproduct per day. However, machine A willrequire a floor space of 12 square feet while

    machine B will require 18 square feet andcompany has total floor space of 180 squarefeet only. Determine the minimum numberof machines that should be purchased.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    35/43

    ABC COMPANY HAS 4 INDEPENDENTNVESTMENT PROJECTS AND MUST ALLOCATE A

    XED CAPITAL TO ONE OR MORE OF THEM SOHAT THE COMPANYS NET PRESENT VALUE ISAXIMIZED. THE ESTIMATED NET PRESENT VALUEND THE ANTICIPATED CASH OUTFLOWSSSOCIATED WITH THESE PROJECTS IS GIVEN INHE FOLLOWING TABLE:

    NPV CASH OUTFLOWS(RS.1000)

    PR. NO (RS. 1000) YEAR(I) YEAR(II)

    1 100 50 150

    2 50 105 30

    3 140 318 143

    4 90 100 68

    IN SELECTING THESE PROJECTS, THE COMPANY ISONSTRAINED TO LIMIT ITS EXPENDITURE IN THE FIRSTEAR TO RS.5, 15,000 AND IN THE SECOND YEAR TO RS.38,000.

    IF PROJECTS 1 AND 3 ARE MCTUALLY EXCLUSIVE,OW SHOULD THE INVESTMENT BE MADE SO THAT THEOTAL NET PRESENT VALUE IS MAXIMIZED?

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    36/43

    SET-UP COST PER MAX.

    MACHINE COST(Rs) UNIT (Rs) PRODUCTION

    1 8000 5 40002 5000 4 30003 4000 8 1000

    QUANTITY REQUIRED:5000 UNITS AT MINIMUM COST.

    PRODUCT

    PLANT P Q R CAPACITY

    A 35 24 20 600B 30 28 25 1,000C 20 25 37 800D 24 32 28 800

    DEMAND 500 800 600

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    37/43

    1. GOALS HAVE PREEMPTIVE PRIORITIES.

    2. MINIMIZE DEVIATIONS FROM GOALS.

    3. ATTACH WEIGHTS TO DIFFERENTACTIVITIES AT THE SAME GOAL LEVEL.

    BASIC CONCEPTS OF GOAL PROGRAMMING

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    38/43

    ,UPHOLSTERY MATERIAL AND A REGULAR DRESSMATERIAL. THE UPHOLSTERY IS PRODUCED ACCORDINGTO DIRECT ORDERS FROM FURNITURE MANUFACTURERS.THE DRESS MATERIAL ON THE OTHER HAND, ISDISTRIBUTED TO RETAIL FABRIC STORES. AVERAGEPRODUCTION RATES FOR THE TWO MATERIALS ARE

    IDENTICAL; 1000 METRES/HR. BY RUNNING TWO SHIFTS,NET OPERATIONAL CAPACITY OF THE PLANT IS 80HOURS/WK. THE MARKETING DEPARTMENT REPORTSTHAT THE MAXIMUM ESTIMATED SALES FOR THEFOLLOWING WEEK IS 70,000 M. OF UPHOLSTERY AND45,000 M. OF DRESS MATERIAL. ACCORDING TO THEACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT, THE APPROXIMATE PROFIT

    FROM A METRE OF UPHOLSTERY MATERIAL IS RS.2.50 ANDFROM A METRE OF DRESS MATERIAL IS RS.1.50.

    THE M.D. OF THE COMPANY BELIVES THAT A GOODEMPLOYER- EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP IS IMPORTANT INBUSINESS. HENCE HE DECIDES THAT A STABLEEMPLOYMENT LEVEL IS A PRIMARY GOAL FOR THE

    FIRM. THEREFORE, WHENEVER THERE IS EXCESSDEMAND OVER NORMAL PRODUCTION, HE SIMPLYEXPANDS PRODUCTION CAPACITY BY PROVIDINGOVERTIME. HOWEVER HE FEELS THAT OVERTIME OFMORE THAN 10 HOURS/WK. SHOULD BE AVOIDEDBECAUSE OF ACCELERATING COSTS.

    CONTD.P/2.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    39/43

    FIRST GOAL : AVOID UNDER UTILISATION OFPRODUCTION CAPACITY,I.E. MAINTAIN STABLE EMPLOYMENT AT NORMALCAPACITY

    SECOND GOAL : LIMIT OT OPERATION TO 10 HOURS. THIRD GOAL :ACHIEVE SALES GOALS OF 70,000 M. OF

    UPHOLSTERY AND 45,000 M. OF DRESS MATERIAL. FOURTH GOAL : MINIMISE OT OPERATION AS MUCH AS

    POSSIBLE. FORMULATE AND SOLVE THIS PROBLEM AS A GOAL

    PROGRAMMING PROBLEM.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    40/43

    BHARAT TELEVISION COMPANY PRODUCES CTV SETS.IT HAS TWO PRODUCTION LINES. PRODUCTION RATEOF LINE-1 IS 2 SETS/HR. AND IT IS 1.1/2 SETS/ HR. INLINE-2. THE REGULAR PRODUCTION CAPACITY IS 40HR./WK. FOR BOTH LINES. EXPECTED PROFIT FROM ANAVERAGE CTV SET IS RS.1000/- . THE TOPMANAGEMENT OF THE FIRM HAS THE FOLLOWINGGOALS FOR THE WEEK (IN ORDINAL RANKING):

    GOAL -1: PRODUCTION GOAL 180 SETS.GOAL 2 : LIMIT OT OF LINE-1 TO 10 HOURS.GOAL 3 : AVOID UNDERUTILISATION OF

    REGULAR WORKING HOURS FORBOTH LINES.

    GOAL 4 : LIMIT THE SUM OF OT FOR BOTHLINES. (ASSIGN WTS. ACCORDING TO

    RELATIVE COST OF OT HOUR. ASSUMECOST OF OPREATIONS IS IDENTICALFOR BOTH PRODUCTION LINES)

    FORMULATE THE PROBLEM AS A GLP MODEL. IFTHE TOP MANAGEMENT DESIRES TO PUT A PROFITGOAL OF RS.1,90,000 FOR THE WEEK AS THE TOPPRIORITY GOAL ABOVE THE STATED FOUR GOALS,HOW WOULD THE MODEL CHANGE.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    41/43

    APPLICATION AREAS OF GOAL PROGRAMMING

    GOAL PROGRAMMING HAS BEEN WIDELY APPLIED TOVARIOUS DECISION PROBLEMS IN BUSINESS FIRMS,GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND NON PROFIT INSTITUTIONS.SOME OF THE BEST KNOWN APPLICATIONS OF GOALPROGRAMMING INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING PROBLEMAREAS: ACADEMIC PLANNING AND

    ADMINISTRATION ACCOUNTING ANALYSIS ADVERTISING MEDIA

    SCHEDULING BLOOD COLLECTION ANDDISTRIBUTION

    CAPITAL BUDGETING COMPUTER RESOURCE

    PLANNING ANDALLOCATION

    DECISION-SUPPORT

    SYSTEM DESIGN ECONOMIC POLICYANALYSIS

    EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMPLANNING

    ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION

    PORTFOLIO

    DETERMINATION PRODUCTION SCHEDULING PROJECT SCHEDULING QUALITY CONTROL

    FACILITIES LOCATION ANDLAYOUT PLANNING

    FINANCIAL PLANING HEALTH-CARE DELIVERY

    SYESTEM DESIGN INVENTORY MANAGEMENT LOCATION AND

    ALLOCATION DECISIONS MANPOWER PLANNING MARKETING LOGISTICS MILITARY STRATEGIES

    AND PLANNING

    NETWORK SCHEDULING ORGANIZATIONAL

    ANALYSIS PERSONNEL

    ADMINISTRATION POLICY ANALYSIS RESEARCH AND

    DEVELOPMENT TRANSPORTATION

    LOGISTICS URBAN PLANNING WATER RESOURCES

    PLANNING

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    42/43

    OCATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    1 - 12 27 14 45 36 15

    2 - 10 25 32 M 22

    3 - 28 50 28 10

    4 - 16 20 32

    5 - 26 35

    6 - 20

    7 -.

    TOTAL OF 30, 50 & 20 TONNES OF THIS COMMODITY ARETO BE SENT FROM LOCATIONS 1, 2 & 3 RESPECTIVELY. ATOTAL OF 15, 30 25 & 30 TONNES ARE TO BE SENT TOLOCATIONS 4, 5, 6 & 7 RESPECTIVELY. SHIPMENTS CAN BESENT THROUGH INTERMEDIATE LOCATIONS AT A COSTEQUAL TO THE SUM OF THE COSTS FOR EACH OF THE LEGSOF THE JOURNEY. THE PROBLEM IS TO DETERMINE THE

    A CERTAIN CORPORATION MUST SHIP A CERTAINPERISHABLE COMMODITY FROM LOCATIONS 1, 2, 3, TOLOCATIONS 4, 5, 6 &7. A

    THE AIR FREIGHT PER TONNE (IN 100 RS.)BETWEEN SEVEN LOCATIONS IS GIVEN IN THE FOLLOWINGTABLE. WHERE NO DIRECT AIR FREIGHT SERVICE ISAVAILABLE, A VERY HIGH COST M HAS BEEN USED.

  • 8/3/2019 Opn Research by Prof Narang

    43/43

    A PROBLEM ON DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING

    A GOVERNMENT SPACE PROJECT IS CONDUCTINGRESEARCH ON A CERTAIN ENGINEERING PROBLEM THATMUST BE SOLVED BEFORE MAN CAN FLY TO THE MOONSAFELY. THREE RESEARCH TEAMS ARE CURRENTLYTRYING THREE DIFFERENT APPROACHES FOR SOLVINGTHIS PROBLEM THE ESTIMATE HAS BEEN MADE THATUNDER PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCES, THE PROBABILITYTHAT THE RESPECTIVE TEAMS-CALL THEM A,B AND C

    WILL NOT SUCCEED IS 0.40,0.60 AND 0.80 RESPECTIVELY.THUS THE CURRENT PROBABILITY THAT ALL THE THREETEAMS WILL FAIL IS= 0.192. SINCE THE OBJECTIVE IS TOMINIMIZE THIS PROBABILITY THE DECISION HAS BEENMADE TO ASSIGN TWO MORE TOP SCIENTISTS AMONG THETHREE TEAMS IN ORDER TO LOWER IT AS MUCH ASPOSSIBLE. THE FOLLOWING TABLES GIVES THEESTIMATED PROBABILITIES OF FAILURE WHEN 0, 1 AND 2

    .SCIENTISTS ARE ADDED TO THE TEAMS.TEAM

    A B CNO.OF 0 0.40 0.60 0.80NEW SCIENTISTS 1 0.20 0.40 0.50

    2 0.15 0.20 0.30

    HOW SHOULD THE TWO SCIENTISTS BE ALLOCATED TTHE TEAMS?