8/19/2019 Opinions Rechelle

1/2

G.R. No. 200898 June 15, 2015

BROWN MADONNA PRESS INC., THADDEUS ANTHON A. CABANGON,

!ORTUNE "I!E INSURANCE COMPAN,, Petitioners,

vs.

MARIA ROSARIO M. CASAS, Respondent.

OPINION#

Summary dismissal of an employee violates his right to security of tenure, a right

aorded with protection by the constitution. When an employee is summarily

dismissed, like what the employer in this case did to Casas when they had a

company meeting and told her not to report for work anymore right there and then,

the employer violated not only Casas personal right but also the Constitution itself.!reat is the protection of the Constitution when it comes to labor as the e"istence of 

employers social advantage over the employee is a principle in labor laws. #t is the

States duty to promote social $ustice, hence the Constitutions protection to labor is

so immense that dismissing an employee does not depend on the employers

whims only. %here should be $ust or authori&ed cause for the termination and the

employer has to comply with the due process re'uired by law ( the twin

re'uirements of notice and hearing. %hese were not shown in the present case.

 %herefore, the student respectfully submits her concurrence with the Supreme

Courts decision in awarding Casas the backwages and damages that she has

prayed for.

G.R. No. 198$%5 A&'() 22, 2015

"ITE* G"ASS AND A"UMINUM SUPP" AND+OR RONA"D ONGSITCO, 

Petitioner,

vs.

DOMINADOR SANCHE-, Respondents.

OPINION#

 %he )*+ Constitution, in -rticle ##, Section )), states that the State values thedignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for human rights.

-pplying the above constitutional provision, the student respectfully submits herconcurrence with the Courts decision in this case. Security of tenure is one of theworkers rights. Social $ustice re'uires that every persons rights must be protected.

 %he Courts ruling in this case supports the workers right to security of tenure.

8/19/2019 Opinions Rechelle

2/2