Open Peer Review
-
Upload
emily-ford -
Category
Education
-
view
270 -
download
0
Transcript of Open Peer Review
Open Peer Review
Emily FordUrban & Public Affairs LibrarianPortland State [email protected]
WHAT IS PEER REVIEW?
WHAT IS THE GOAL OF PEER REVIEW?
“…Depending on its environment, peer reviewing can differ as to its purposes, participants, process, and product. In qualitative research, peer review may also be used to improve a research proposal or project's trustworthiness.”
-Chenail, R. (2008). Peer Review. In Lisa M. Given (Ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. (pp. 605-607).
“…the goal of peer review is to make good and defensible judgments rather than to have high reliability…”
-Mark,M. & Chua, P. (2005). Peer Review. In S. Mathison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Evaluation. (p. 301).
Submission
Review
Publication
Peer Review Process
Taweed Manzoorflic.kr/p/4w7zdcCC-BY
Open Review
Rob Cottinghamflic.kr/p/8FbWsQCC-BY-NC
Before
During After
Before & During Pics in Public Domain: 1.usa.gov/1LkVhjS
Tony Websterflic.kr/p/vK44SYCC-BY
BeforeF1000ResearchIn the Library with the Lead Pipe
DuringBioMed CentralPeerJAtmospheric Chemistry & Physics
AfterPLoS OneBMJ
WHO DOES THE REVIEWING?
Author identified reviewers
EditorsAuthor-supplied reviewersEditor-supplied reviewers
Expert PEERJ Community MembersAcademic EditorsScientific Community
RefereesEditors
Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics
ReviewersEditors
ReviewersEditors
Daniel Leeflic.kr/p/nrwgpVCC-BY-ND
Before After
Before Pics in Public Domain: 1.usa.gov/1LkVhjS
Tony Websterflic.kr/p/vK44SYCC-BY
Submission
Review
Publication
Open Peer Review Process
Submission
Review
Publication
OR
Gideon Burtonflic.kr/p/5P2D9wCC-BY-SA
FOR YOU, WHAT ARE THE PROS?
FOR YOU, WHAT ARE THE CONS?
Open Peer Review
Pro• Reviewer accountability• Better reviews• Enhances discourse for readers• Provides for developmental
writing & research relationship• Timeline to publish/reviews• Transparency in editorial
decision-making• Reviewers’ acknowledgment
for work• Discourse among reviewers
Con• Protects against implicit
bias• Recruiting reviewers• Adoption Barriers• Hard to manage (?)
WHAT WOULD IT TAKE FOR YOU TO PARTICIPATE?
Author identified reviewers
EditorsAuthor-supplied reviewersEditor-supplied reviewers
Expert PEERJ Community MembersAcademic EditorsScientific Community
RefereesEditors
Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics
ReviewersEditors
ReviewersEditors
Garry Knightflic.kr/p/7qw7ivCC-BY