On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

19
On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007) Jean-Pierre Chauffour Lead Economist, World Bank GWU, April 8, 2011

description

Jean-Pierre Chauffour Lead Economist, World Bank GWU, April 8, 2011. On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007). Development?. Growth Commission Report (2008). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Page 1: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in DevelopmentNew Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Jean-Pierre ChauffourLead Economist, World Bank

GWU, April 8, 2011

Page 2: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Development?

Page 3: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Growth Commission Report (2008) Characteristics of 13 economies that

have been able to grow at more than 7% for a period of 25 years since 1950: Leadership and governance Engagement with the global economy High rates of investment and savings Mobile resources, especially labor Inclusiveness to share globalization

benefits

Page 4: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

How to achieve those outcomes?

Why do countries differ in terms of: Factor accumulation and innovation Level of schooling Quality of infrastructure Health of the population Other proximate factors of economic growth

Why on average certain countries create better institutions, promote better policies, and achieve better outcomes?

Page 5: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Institutions?

Page 6: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Only two possible sets of factors Exogenous factors

Geography and location Natural resource endowment Ethno linguistic homogeneity Various other types of good and bad luck

Endogenous factors Free individual choices Coerced individual decisions

Page 7: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Freedom vs. entitlement

Negative rights (freedom from) Economic freedom Civil rights and political liberties

Positive “rights” (entitlement to) Regulations, taxation, government

interventions Public goods Various economic and social entitlements

Page 8: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Freedom vs. entitlement

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0456789

101112

FREEDOM versus ENTITLEMENT

DEV

ELO

PMEN

T

Page 9: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Uganda vs. Zimbabwe

1983

1986

1989

1992

1995

1998

2001

2004

2007

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Uganda

GDPEFW

1980198

2198

4198

6198

8199

0199

2199

4199

6199

8200

0200

2200

40

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Zimbabwe

GDPEFW

Page 10: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Model specification

Dyi is the average growth of per capita GDP of country i Y0 is the initial level of GDP EFio, CPRi0, and SEi0 are the initial levels of the economic

freedom index, civil and political rights index, and social entitlement index

dEF, dCPR, and dSE are changes in the respective indexes over the period under investigation

Xi is a vector of control exogenous variables Tropics represents the extent of land located in the geographical

tropics Remoteness measures the average distance to world markets Pop100K indicates the proportion of population living within 100 km of

the coastline or ocean-navigable river Resources is a dummy variable for countries with subsoil assets

Page 11: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Data The index of economic freedom (EF) is the simple average of four of the five

areas of the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World (EFW), namely the legal structure and security of property rights, access to sound money, the freedom to trade internationally, and the regulation of credit, labor and business.

The index of civil and political rights (CPR) is computed as the simple average of Freedom House’s Civil Rights (CR) and Political Liberties (PL) indices. Civil rights indicates whether citizens are able to participate freely in the political process, compete for public office, join political parties and organizations, and elect their representatives. Political liberties allow for freedom of expression and belief, association and organization rights, rule of law and personal autonomy.

The index of social entitlement (SE) is computed from the fifth area of the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World. It is a measure of the size of government in providing goods, services and other social entitlements beyond the minimal state. It includes the general government consumption spending as a percentage of total consumption, transfers and subsidies as a percentage of GDP, government enterprises and investment, and top marginal tax rate.

Page 12: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Civil rights vs. political liberties

Where 8 indicates the highest level of civil rights and political liberties, and the size of bubbles represent the number of countries.

Source: Freedom House, 2007.

Where 8 indicates the highest level of civil rights and political liberties,and the size of bubbles represent the number of countries. Source: Freedom House, 2007.

Where 8 indicates the highest level of civil rights and political liberties,and the size of bubbles represent the number of countries. Source: Freedom House, 2007.

Where 8 indicates the highest level of civil rights and political liberties,and the size of bubbles represent the number of countries. Source: Freedom House, 2007.

02

46

8P

R

0 2 4 6 8CL

Page 13: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

CPRs vs. per Capita Income

Source: Freedom House and World Bank, 2007

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 84

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS

ln G

DP

PPP

per

capi

ta P

PP

Page 14: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

ESCRs vs. per Capita Income

Source: Fraser Institute and World Bank, 2007

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 104

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

ESCRs measured by the size of governemnet (inverted scale)

ln G

DP

per

capi

ta (

PPP)

Page 15: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Economic freedom vs. per Capita Income

Source: Fraser Institute and World Bank, 2007

4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 94

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Economic Freedom

ln G

DP

per

capi

ta (

PPP)

Page 16: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

ResultsCoefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient Coefficient

Column 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

EF 1.099*** 0.946*** 1.071*** 0.969***

dEF 1985-1994 1.335*** 1.250*** 1.045*** 1.375***

dEF 1995-2004 0.994*** 0.827*** 1.047*** 0.928***

CPR 0.562*** 0.428*** 0.446*** 0.332**

dCPR 1985-1994 0.426** 0.328* 0.335 0.230

dCPR 1995-2004 0.267* 0.210 0.264* 0.127

SE -0.255* -0.111 -0.192 -0.524

dSE 1985-1994 0.013 0.108 0.029 0.121

dSE 1995-2004 0.016 0.308** 0.026 0.283*

initial GDP per capita -0.740*** -0.585*** -0.290** -0.868*** -0.766*** -0.496*** -0.879***

Tropics -1.694*** -2.179*** -2.413*** -1.660*** -1.803*** -2.343*** -1.748***

Resources 0.526 0.625 -0.099 1.041** 1.069** 0.616 1.360**

Pop100km 1.286*** 1.660*** 2.082*** 0.813* 1.279*** 1.599*** 0.922*

Remoteness -0.148** -0.190** -0.201** -0.125* -0.127* -0.170** -0.110

Constant -5.202*** -1.281* 1.934** -5.733*** -7.370*** 0.181 -5.121***

No of countries 98 109 105 97 98 103 97

Adjusted R-sq: 0.562 0.429 0.405 0.588 0.599 0.429 0.608

Page 17: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Conclusion

Goal(i) = F (Right1, Right2, Right3, …)

17

2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0456789

101112

Economic Freedom and Civil and Political Rights

Econ

omic

and

Soc

ial G

oals

Page 18: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

Thank you

Page 19: On The Relevance of Negative And Positive Rights in Development New Empirical Evidence (1975-2007)

For more, www.amazon.com

19