On the Perturbation of the Pseudoinverse
-
Upload
alejandra-orellana -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of On the Perturbation of the Pseudoinverse
-
7/24/2019 On the Perturbation of the Pseudoinverse
1/30
On the Perturbation of Pseudo-Inverses, Projections and Linear Least Squares Problems
Author(s): G. W. StewartReviewed work(s):Source: SIAM Review, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Oct., 1977), pp. 634-662Published by: Society for Industrial and Applied MathematicsStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2030248.
Accessed: 16/07/2012 14:32
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at.http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematicsis collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to SIAM Review.
http://www.jstor.org
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=siamhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2030248?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2030248?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=siam -
7/24/2019 On the Perturbation of the Pseudoinverse
2/30
SIAM
REVIEW
Vol. 19, No. 4, October
1977
ON
THE
PERTURBATION
OF
PSEUDO-INVERSES,
PROJECTIONS
AND LINEAR LEAST SQUARES PROBLEMS*
G.
W.
STEWARTt
Abstract.
This paper surveysperturbation
heory
for the pseudo-inverse
Moore-Penrose
generalized
nverse), orthe orthogonal
rojection
nto the column pace
of a matrix, nd for
he
linear eastsquares problem.
1.
Introduction.he
pseudo-inverse
or Moore-Penrose
generalized
inverse)f a matrix
maybe defined
s theunique
matrix t satisfyinghe
followingonditions
due to
Penrose1955)]:
(l.l1a)
AtAAt=At,
(li.b)
AA
tA =A,
(1.
lc)
(AA
)H
=AA
t,
(li.d)
(AtA)H=AtA.
The pseudo-inverse
nd ts generalizations
ave
been extensively
nvestigated
and widely pplied.One
reason or his nterest
n thepseudo-inverse
s that
t
permits
he
succinct
xpression
f some mportant
eometriconstructions
n
n-dimensionalpace.Thispaperwill e concerned ith hepseudo-inversend
two
elated
eometric
onstructions:
he rthogonalrojection
nto subspace
andthe inear east quares
roblem.
The
orthogonal
rojection nto
a subspace
X is the unique
Hermitian,
idempotent
atrix
whose olumnpace
denoted yR (P)]
is
X.
It follows rom
(1. a)
that hematrix
PA
=AAt
is Hermitianndfrom1. b)
thatA
is
dempotent
ndR
(PA)
=
R A).
Hence
A
is
the rthogonalrojection
nto
R
(A).
A
similar
rgument
hows
hat
(1.2)
RA=AtA
is
theprojection
ntoR/(AH),
the
row
paceof
A.
The
second
onstruction
s the
olution f
he inear east quares roblem
f
choosing
vector to
minimize
(1.3)
p(x)
=
||b
AxII2,
where
is
a
fixed ectornd
1
12
enotes
he sual
uclidean
orm.
he
olutions
of
this
roblem
re
given y
(1.4)
x
=
A
tb
a
(I-RA.
Z
*
Received by the editorsAugust
18, 1975, and in revisedform ebruary
5, 1976.
t Computer
cience
Department,
University
f
Maryland, ollege Park,Maryland
0742. This
workwas supported n partby the
Office f Naval Research.
634
-
7/24/2019 On the Perturbation of the Pseudoinverse
3/30
ON THE PERTURBATION
OF PSEUDO-INVERSES
635
where
is arbitrary. henA
has full olumn
ank,RA
=
I and the
solution
x
=
A
tb
s
unique.Otherwise,
t
s easily erified
rom1.1)
and 1.2) thatA tb s
orthogonalo
I-RA)Z,
sothat y hePythagoreanheorem
IIxII2
IA
tb
+II(I-RA)Z
2.
It follows hat
=
A tb
s theunique olution f 1.3) that as minimal
orm.
The
object f his aper s to
describehe ffectsfperturbations
nA onA
onPA,
nd
on
A
tb; .e.,on
the
seudo-inverse,
n
the
rojection
nto
R
(A), and
on the solution f the linear
east squares problem.
uch
descriptions
re
important
or hree easons.
irst, he results re useful
mathematicalools.
Second,
n
numericalpplications
he elements f
A
will seldom
be known
exactly,
nd t
s
necessaryohavebounds n
the ffectsf he ncertainties
n
A.
Finally,many umericalrocesses or omputingrojectionsnd east quares
solutions
ehave
s ifexact omputations
ad been performedn a
perturbed
matrix
+
E, where is a small
matrix hose izedepends
n the lgorithmnd
the rithmetic
sed
n
ts xecution.
We shallbe
concerned
ith hree
kinds
f results: erturbation
ounds,
asymptoticxpressions,
ndderivatives.
he
perturbation
ounds
re needed
n
the
pplications
entioned
bove.
Asymptotic
xpressions
nd
derivatives
re
useful omputationalools
when heperturbation
s
actually nown.Moreover
they
an be used
to
check
the
sharpness
f
the
perturbation
ounds.Not
surprisingly
t
s
rather
ifficulto obtain reasonably
harp erturbationound
that ells he ompletetory f he ffectsf he erturbations.symptoticorms
and derivatives
re
easier o come
by.
In
order
omake
his
urvey
easonablyelf-contained,
ebegin
n
?
2
with
reviewf he
necessaryackground.
n
?
3 wedevelop he erturbation
heoryor
the
pseudo-inverse,
n
?
4
for
he
projection
A,
nd n
?
5
for
he east quares
solution
tb.
Notes nd references. or background
n
the
generalized
nverse ee the
books y
Ben-Israel ndGreville1974),Boullion
ndOdell 1971),
nd
Rao and
Mitra
1971).
The
expression1.1)
s
due
oPenrose
1955),
1956),
whose apers
initiatedhe urrentnterestnthepseudo-inverse.
Many
rticles
n
perturbationheory
or seudo-inverses
nd
related rob-
lems
have appeared
n
the iterature.
o date themost
omplete urvey f the
problem
as beengiven
yWedin1973).
n addition o collectingnd
unifying
earlier
material,
his
aper
will
resent
ome
new
results.
2.
Preliminaries.
Notation. hroughout
his
paper
we
shalluse the
notationalonventions
ofHouseholder
1964).Specifically,
atricesre
denoted
yupper
ase talic
nd
Greek
etters,
ectors
y
ower
ase talic
etters,
nd calars
y
ower
ase Greek
letters.
he
symbol
denotes
he et
of
omplex umbers,
"
the etof
omplex
n-vectors,nd
Crxn
the etofcomplexmxn matrices. hematrix
H
is the
conjugate
ranspose
f
A. The
column
pace
of
A
is
denoted
yR(A),
and
ts
orthogonalomplement
y
R
(A)'.
We shallbe concerned
ith fixedmatrix
e Crxn
with
rank
A)
=
r.
-
7/24/2019 On the Perturbation of the Pseudoinverse
4/30
636
G. W.
STEWART
The
matrix
E
CmXn
will
enote
perturbation
f
A andwe shall
et
B =A +E.
Since
we
are
concerned
ith
he
eometry
f
C',
we
shall
e
atsome
pains
o
cast
ur
results
n
uch
way hat
hey re
not ffected
yunitary
ransformations
(cf.
the
section
n
unitarily
nvariant
orms elow).
We
may
use
thisfact
o
transform
ur
perturbation
roblems
nto
simpler
orm.
pecifically,
et
U
=
(Ul,
U2) E
mX m be a
unitary
atrix
ith
(U1)
=
R
(A)
and
et
V
=
(V1,
V2)bea
unitary
atrix
ith 2
V1)
R
(A
H)
Then
UHA
V has the
form
(2.1)
UA
V=
(
?)
where
1l
E
Crxr
s
nonsingular.e shallpartition
HEV
and
UHBV
confor-
mally
with
UHA
V:
UHEv (Ell
E12
UH
(
l
B12\=
(All+Ell
E12
E2.
E22
B21 B22 E21
E22
These
forms
ill
e called
educed orms
f
hematrices
,
B, and
E,
and
n
the
sequel
we
shall ften
ssume
hat hematrices
re
n
reduced
orm.
n
this
ase,
thepseudo-inverse
s
given
y
(2.2) A =(
lO
Singular
alues.
t s
a
well-known
esult hat
n thereduced orm
2.1)
the
matrices
1 and
V1may
e chosen
o
that
A11
=
diag aO,
02,
,
r),
where
cYl
>
0
.
r>?
This
educed
orm
s called
he
ingular
alue
decomposition
f he
matrix
,
and
thenumbers-i re alled he ingularalues fA. From he elation2.2)and he
fact
hat
UHAV)t=
VHAt
U,
it
follows
hat
At=
V(X
) UH.
The th ingular
alue f
matrix ,
which
ill e denoted
y
o-i(A),
an
be
written
n theform
(2.3)
ai(A)=
sup inf
IIAxII2
(i=1,2, n),
dim(,t)
i
xFE
lIX
12
1
where
(2.4)
IIYI12
_-1YH
is the
usualEuclidean
orm.
his
haracterization
rovides
natural
onvention
for numbering
he
singular
values of
a
rectangular
matrix:
A
e
Cmxn
has
n
-
7/24/2019 On the Perturbation of the Pseudoinverse
5/30
ON
THE
PERTURBATION
OF
PSEUDO-INVERSES
637
singular
alues
of
whichn
-
r
are
zero;
A
H
has
m
singular
alues of which
m
-
r
are zero.
The
nonzero ingular
alues
f
A
and
AH
are
the
ame.
Two nequalitieshatwe shallneed nthe equelfollowairly irectlyrom
(2.3).
They re
o-i
A )
-
o-,
E)
_--
-iA
+
E)
o-ci
A )
+
o-i
E)
and
(2.5)
o-i
AC)o-'i
(A)
o-,(C),
o-1(A)rri(C).
Unitarily
nvariantmatrix orms.
A
norm
n
C
Xn
s
function
ii
1mxn
R
that
atisfieshe
onditions
1. A0# IIAII>O,
(2.6)
2.
IIaAII=IaIIIAII,
3.
IA
BII?II||AII+IIBII.
A
norm is
unitarily
nvariant
f
IIUHA
VII I|A
|
for
ll
unitary
atrices and
V.The
perturbation
ounds
n
his
aper
will e cast
in
terms funitarily
nvariant
orms,
hose
roperties
ill
now
be described.
Let U and
V
be the
unitary
atrices
ealizing
he
ingular
alue
decomposi-
tion fthematrix e Cm
n.
Thenfor nyunitarilynvariantorm
1
IIm,n
(2.7)
IIA
In
= IUH
A
VIIm,n
l(
o)|m
Thus A
lIm,n
s
functionf
the
ingular
alues
f
A, say
(2.8)
IIA
Im,n
(Pm,n(LTi,
2,
,n)
It
follows rom2.6)
that
Pm,n
egarded
s
a
functionn
Rn s a
norm.
ince he
interchange
f wo ows
rtwo olumns
f
matrix
s
a
unitary
ransformation
f
thematrix,hefunction
Pm,n
s
symmetricn tsarguments
-1, r2,
,
-n.t can
also
be
shown
hat
Prm,n
s
nondecreasing
n
the ense
hat
(2.9)
0
-
R
be a family f unitarilynvariant
norms. hen
1
11
s uniformlyenerated
f
heres a
symmetricunction
0,
efined
for
ll nfinite
equences
with
nly
finite umber
fnonzero
erms,
uch hat
IIA 1
SD
o-1
A
,
02(A
, on(A
,
O,O,)
for
llA E
CtmXn
t
is
normalized
f
lx
I=
IX 12
for
ny
vector considered
s
a
matrix.
The functionp nthe bovedefinition ust atisfy
he onditions2.6). Any
norm efined y uch functionan be normalized.ndeedwe have
llxii
p(P-1(X),
0, 0,
' '
')
=
p
1IX112,
, 0,
..),
from
hich
tfollows
hatlx
1
U
|X
12or ome onstant
u
that s ndependent
f
the
dimensionf
x. The
function
1S
p
then
enerates
henormalizedamily
f
norms.
A
uniformlyenerated
amilyfnorms as omenice roperties.irst,ince
the
nonzero ingular
alues
f matrixnd ts onjugate ransposere the ame,
we have
IIA
HII
=
ii.
Second,
f
matrix
s
bordered
y eromatrices,tsnorm emainsnchanged;
.e.,
-
7/24/2019 On the Perturbation of the Pseudoinverse
7/30
ON
THE
PERTURBATION OF PSEUDO-INVERSES 639
In particularf
A
is n reduced orm,hen
IIAiI=IIA11j1nd IIAtII=11A-11.
It s also consequencef 2.12)that2.11)holds or uniformlyenerated
amily
ofnorms heneverhe roduct D is defined,s may e seenbybordering and
D with eromatricesntil hey re both quare.
A third ropertys thatf1I isnormalizedhen
(2.13)
IA
112
IA
1
In fact rom2.11) andthefact hat
xi
=
11xI12,
e have
(2.14) IIAxII2
IAx
1
A
1AIIX112
for
llx. But
by 2.10)
h|All2
s
the mallest umber
or
which
2.14) holds or
ll
x,
fromwhich 2.13) follows. trivial orollaryf 2.11) and 2.13) is that
iii
s
consistent:
IICDII
I|CIIIDI|.
Finally e observe hat
(2.15) VxIICxII2
IIDxII2
GC||
IDII.
To prove his mplicationote hat y 2.3) thehypothesismplies hat
-j(C)?
oir(D).Hencethe nequality
ICII=IIDII
ollows rom2.9).In
the sequel
11
1
ill
lways efer o
a
uniformlyenerated, ormalized,
unitarilynvariantorm.
Perturbation f matrix nverses.We shall later need some results n the
inverses f perturbationsf nonsingular atrices.hese re summarized
n
the
following
heorem.
THEOREM
2.2
If
A
and
B = A + E
are
nonsingular,
hen
(2.16)
JIB
1
A
1l/IIA
'11
IhEIIIIA
,
where
(2.17) Ic
IIA
IB-112.
If
A
is nonsingularnd
(2.18)
IIA-11121
EII