On the Metamorphoses of Maxwell’s Equations During...

2
On the Metamorphoses of Maxwell’s Equations During the Last 150 Years — spotlights on the history of classical electrodynamics — Alberto Favaro * , Friedrich W. Hehl , and Jonathan Lux * Imperial College, London, UK; e-mail: [email protected] Univ. of Cologne, Germany, and Univ. of Missouri-Colombia, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Univ. of Cologne, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract—We outline Maxwell’s five decisive papers on his equations governing electrodynamics (1862-1868). We study the metamorphoses of these equations and find essentially twelve different versions of them. We express our preference for the so-called premetric version of the Maxwell equations, which is particularly useful in understanding the structure of electrody- namics. Some selected applications are discussed. The twelve different versions of the Maxwell equations, which we will discuss chronologically, are the following: 1. In components: Maxwell 1862-65. 2. In quaternions (Hamilton 1843): Maxwell 1865, 1873. 3. In symbolic vector calculus: Heaviside 1885-88, F¨ oppl 1894, Gibbs 1901. 4. In components (compact, without vector potential A): Hertz 1890, including ansatz for moving bodies. 5. In components ` a la Maxwell-Hertz plus Lorentz trans- formations: Einstein 1905. 6. In 4d calculus (components and symbolic) for special relativity: Minkowski 1907-08. gravity = 7. In 4d generally covariant tensor calculus: Einstein 1916 (shortly after establishing general relativity). 8. In premetric/integral formulation up to about 1960: (Maxwell 1868, Murnaghan 1920) Kottler 1922, Car- tan 1923-24 (in differential forms), van Dantzig, Schr¨ odinger, Schouten, Truesdell-Toupin 1961, Post 1962. 9. In spinor calculus (after Pauli 1927 and Dirac 1928 and commencing in 1929): Fock & Ivanenko, London, Weyl, Infeld & van der Waerden, Corson reviewed by Penrose & Rindler 1984 in the context of general relativity. 10. In 4d Clifford algebra formalism, including quaternions and octonions: Riesz 1958 Lounesto 1997, Baylis 1999, ... , Hitzer 2012. 11. In algebraic (discrete) formulation in terms of (co)chains Bossavit, Tonti (“Algebraic formulation of physical fields”) “Maxwell in chains,” direct implementation by means of algebraic computer code. 12. In 3d and 4d exterior calculus (premetric topological form of Maxwell’s equations): Kiehn, Post; Baldomir & Hammond, Kovetz, Russer, Lindell, H. & Obukhov; Fig. 1. Maxwell Monument in Edinburgh, Scotland. signature of the 4d Lorentz metric linked to the Lenz rule and to the sign of the energy density Obukhov, Itin, Friedman, H.. We invite comments and critical remarks to our findings, particularly to the 12-fold way, which we presented, see our email addresses above.

Transcript of On the Metamorphoses of Maxwell’s Equations During...

Page 1: On the Metamorphoses of Maxwell’s Equations During …emts2016.org/data/uploads/espoohehlmetamorph_03.pdf · & Hammond, Kovetz, Russer, Lindell, H. & Obukhov; ... • A. Favaro:

On the Metamorphoses of Maxwell’s EquationsDuring the Last 150 Years — spotlights on the

history of classical electrodynamics —Alberto Favaro∗, Friedrich W. Hehl†, and Jonathan Lux‡

∗Imperial College, London, UK; e-mail: [email protected]†Univ. of Cologne, Germany, and Univ. of Missouri-Colombia,USA; e-mail: [email protected]

‡Univ. of Cologne, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract—We outline Maxwell’s five decisive papers on hisequations governing electrodynamics (1862-1868). We study themetamorphoses of these equations and find essentially twelvedifferent versions of them. We express our preference for theso-called premetric version of the Maxwell equations, which isparticularly useful in understanding the structure of electrody-namics. Some selected applications are discussed.

The twelve different versions of the Maxwell equations,which we will discuss chronologically, are the following:

1. In components: Maxwell 1862-65.2. In quaternions (Hamilton 1843): Maxwell 1865, 1873.3. In symbolic vector calculus: Heaviside 1885-88, Foppl

1894, Gibbs 1901.4. In components (compact, without vector potential A):

Hertz 1890, including ansatz for moving bodies.5. In components a la Maxwell-Hertzplus Lorentz trans-

formations: Einstein 1905.6. In 4d calculus (components and symbolic) for special

relativity: Minkowski 1907-08.gravity=⇒ 7. In 4d generally covariant tensor calculus: Einstein 1916

(shortly after establishing general relativity).8. In premetric/integral formulation up to about 1960:

(Maxwell 1868, Murnaghan 1920) Kottler 1922, Car-tan 1923-24 (in differential forms), van Dantzig,Schrodinger, Schouten, Truesdell-Toupin 1961, Post1962.

9. In spinor calculus (after Pauli 1927 and Dirac 1928and commencing in 1929): Fock & Ivanenko, London,Weyl, Infeld & van der Waerden, Corson⇒ reviewedby Penrose & Rindler 1984 in the context of generalrelativity.

10. In 4d Clifford algebra formalism, including quaternionsand octonions: Riesz 1958⇒ Lounesto 1997, Baylis1999, ... , Hitzer 2012.

11. In algebraic (discrete) formulation in terms of (co)chains⇒ Bossavit, Tonti (“Algebraic formulation of physicalfields”) ⇒ “Maxwell in chains,” direct implementationby means of algebraic computer code.

12. In 3d and 4d exterior calculus (premetric topologicalform of Maxwell’s equations): Kiehn, Post; Baldomir& Hammond, Kovetz, Russer, Lindell, H. & Obukhov;

Fig. 1. Maxwell Monument in Edinburgh, Scotland.

signatureof the 4d Lorentz metric linked to the Lenzrule and to the sign of the energy density⇒ Obukhov,Itin, Friedman, H..

We invite comments and critical remarks to our findings,particularly to the 12-fold way, which we presented, see ouremail addresses above.

Page 2: On the Metamorphoses of Maxwell’s Equations During …emts2016.org/data/uploads/espoohehlmetamorph_03.pdf · & Hammond, Kovetz, Russer, Lindell, H. & Obukhov; ... • A. Favaro:

Fig. 2. The Maxwell-Heaviside equations on the monument.

FURTHER READING

• B. Auchmann and S. Kurz,Observers and Splitting Structures in Relativis-tic Electrodynamics,J. Phys. A47, 435202 (2014) [arXiv:1411.0837].

• D. Baldomir and P. Hammond,Geometry of Electromagnetic Systems,Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK (1996).

• A. Bossavit,Computational Electromagnetism: Variational Formulations,Complementarity, Edge Elements,Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1998).

• O. Darrigol,Electrodynamics from Ampere to Einstein,Oxford Univ. Press,Oxford, UK (2000).

• D. H. Delphenich, Pre-metric Electromagnetism,electronic book, 410pages, http://www.neo-classical-physics.info/ (2009).

• C. W. F. Everitt,James Clerk Maxwell,Physicist and Natural Philosopher,Scribners, NY (1975).

• A. Favaro: Recent Advances in Classical Electromagnetic Theory,Ph.D.thesis, Imperial Coll. London (2012).

• A. Favaro, F. W. Hehl, J. Lux,On the Metamorphoses of Maxwell’sEquations...,European Physical J. H, invited contribution (in preparation).

• F. Gronwald, F. W. Hehl and J. Nitsch,Axiomatics of ClassicalElectrodynamics and its Relation to Gauge Field Theory,(2005)[arXiv:physics/0506219].

• F. W. Hehl & Yu. N. Obukhov,Foundations of Classical Electrodynamics:Charge, Flux, and Metric,Birkhauser, Boston, MA (2003).

• Y. Itin and Y. Friedman,Backwards on Minkowski’s Road. From 4D to 3DMaxwellian Electromagnetism,Annalen Phys. (Berlin)17, 769–786 (2008)[arXiv.org:0807.2625].

• Y. Itin and F. W. Hehl,Is the Lorentz Signature of the Metric of Space-Time Electromagnetic in Origin?,Annals Phys. (NY)312, 60–83 (2004)[arXiv:gr-qc/0401016].

• K. Kupfmuller, W. Mathis, A. Reibiger,Theoretische Elektrotechnik,19thed., Springer Vieweg, Berlin (2013).

• I. Lindell: Long History of Electricity(in Finnish), Gaudeamus, Helsinki(2009).

• I. V. Lindell, Multiforms, Dyadics, and Electromagnetic Media,Wiley,Hoboken, NJ [and IEEE Press] (2015).

• P. Lounesto,Clifford Algebras and Spinors,2nd ed., Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, UK (2001).

• T. Matsushita,Electricity and Magnetism: New Formulation by Introductionof Superconductivity,Springer, Tokyo (2014).

• W.-T. Ni, Spacetime Structure and Asymmetric Metric from the PremetricFormulation of Electromagnetism,Phys. Lett. A379, 1297–1303 (2015)[arXiv.org:1411.0460].

• Y. N. Obukhov,Electromagnetic Energy and Momentum in Moving Media,Annalen Phys. (Berlin)17, 830–851 (2008) [arXiv:0808.1967].

• P. Russer,Electromagnetics, Microwave Circuit and Antenna Design forCommunications Engineering,2nd ed., Artech House, Norwood, MA(2006).

• A. Serdyukov, I. Semchenko, S. Tretyakov, and A. Sihvola,Electromag-netics of Bi-anisotropic Materials,Theory and Applications, Gordon andBreach, Amsterdam (2001).

• A. Sihvola and I. V. Lindell,Perfect Electromagnetic Conductor Medium,Annalen Phys. (Berlin)17, 787–802 (2008).

• K. Simonyi, A Cultural History of Physics,CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL(2012).

• E. Tonti,The Mathematical Structure of Classical and Relativistic Physics:a General Classification Diagram,Birkhauser/Springer, New York (2013).

• E. Whittaker, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity,2volumes, Humanities Press, NY (1973) [originally 1951].