OCUA Membership Committee 2005 Captains Survey Results.
-
Upload
bruno-booker -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of OCUA Membership Committee 2005 Captains Survey Results.
OCUA Membership Committee 2005 Captains Survey
Results
Methodology
• Total results are based on n=110– In fact, a total of 112 interviews were conducted, including two teams
interviewed twice– For the purposes of this survey, each team was only included once, using the
first completed interview to determine which set of responses would count.
• Data was collected between Monday June 6th and Friday June 10th
• Margin of error of a study of 110 cases when the total universe consists of a population of 348 potential respondents (342 summer league + 6 competitive) is +/-2.1%, at the 95% confidence level
• Data was collected in person using a self-administered paper questionnaire
• Data collection occurred on site at UPI and Sod as well as a small number of other fields
• In recoding, the 4 competitive and 2 women’s teams surveyed are included as Tier 1-3 teams
Satisfaction Levels
53%
34%
29%
40%
48%
54%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
With OCUAGenerally
My PermittedInvolvement
Players'Permitted
Involvement
Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied
Satisfaction Levels: Overall Satisfaction by Tier
53%
46%
51%
61%
40%
41%
44%
35%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total
Upper (1-3)
Mid (4-6)
Lower (7-10)
Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied
Generally speaking, how satisfied would you say you are with OCUA?
Satisfaction Levels: Captains’ Permitted Involvement
34%
27%
36%
39%
48%
43%
46%
58%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total
Upper (1-3)
Mid (4-6)
Lower (7-10)
Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied
How satisfied would you say you are with the level of involvement you are permitted to have in OCUA's decision-making?
Satisfaction Levels: Players’ Permitted Involvement
29%
24%
26%
42%
54%
54%
49%
58%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total
Upper (1-3)
Mid (4-6)
Lower (7-10)
Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied
Speaking on behalf of your team members, how satisfied would you say they are with the level of involvement they are permitted to have in OCUA's decision-making?
Expected Preference of Players
84%
73%
87%
97%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total
Upper (1-3)
Mid (4-6)
Lower (7-10)
Expect my team's players are not inclined to be more involved
Which of these two views is closer to your own…?
Volunteering
9% 39% 36% 15%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total
Very Interested Somewhat InterestedNot Very Interested Not At All Interested
How interested are you in taking a more active role as a volunteer for OCUA?
How likely is it that you will take a more active role as a volunteer for OCUA?
13% 38% 36% 12%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total
Very Likely Somewhat Likely Not Very Likely Not At All Likely
Proportions of Most Promising Volunteers by Tier
41%
50%
36%
39%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total
Upper (1-3)
Mid (4-6)
Lower (7-10)
% At least somewhat interested AND at least somewhat likely
Claimed Familiarity with BoD Decisions
15%
16%
13%
16%
45%
43%
46%
48%
29%
30%
28%
32%
10%
11%
13%
3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total
Upper (1-3)
Mid (4-6)
Lower (7-10)
Very Familiar Somewhat Familiar
Not Very Familiar Not At All Familiar
How familiar would you say you are with the decisions the OCUA Board of Directors has taken over the past year or two?
Sense of Access to Information on BoD Decisions
69%
62%
67%
84%
31%
38%
33%
16%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total
Upper (1-3)
Mid (4-6)
Lower (7-10)
Agree Disagree
How strongly do you agree or disagree: "Should I want to, I believe that I can find out as much as I might need to about any decisions taken by OCUA's Board of Directors."
Initial Preference: OTOV vs OPOV
66%
54%
64%
87%
31%
43%
33%
10%
3%
3%
3%
3%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Total
Upper (1-3)
Mid (4-6)
Lower (7-10)
One Team, One Vote One Player, One Vote DK/NR
Do you prefer OCUA's current system of "one-team, one-vote", or switching to a system of "one-player, one-vote"?