October 4-5, 2010 1 Electron Lens Superconducting Solenoid Michael Anerella October 4, 2010 Electron...
-
Upload
lizbeth-mccarthy -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
5
Transcript of October 4-5, 2010 1 Electron Lens Superconducting Solenoid Michael Anerella October 4, 2010 Electron...
October 4-5, 20101
Electron LensSuperconducting Solenoid
Michael Anerella
October 4, 2010
Electron Lens
October 4-5, 20102
Outline
Outline of Presentation
Technical Overview Cost & ScheduleRisk ManagementValue Management Project TeamESSH/Quality Assurance Configuration ManagementSummary
October 4-5, 20103
Project Scope
Design, Build and Test 2 eLens Solenoid Magnets:
(under 2 AIP Projects)
• Magnetic, mechanical, electrical requirements as specified by C/AD
• Conduct ongoing communications & meetings to significantly clarify scope, improve design and performance
• Maintain cost control • Deliver 1st magnet by November 2011, 2nd magnet by March
2012
October 4-5, 20104
Magnetic Design – solenoids
Integrated Main Solenoid / Trim Solenoid / Fringe Field Solenoid / Anti-Fringe Field Solenoid / Dipole Correctors provide
- Performance + Versatility -• 5 x 10 -3 field uniformity from 3T to 6T• ± 50 microns field axis straightness over ± 1050mm from 3T
to 6T• (Fringe Field solenoid (needed to address field between
Solenoid and adjacent magnets) / Correctors (formerly room temperature) all added after “job award”, during design phase)
SC solenoid
Copper magnets
Copper magnetsFr
inge
sol
enoi
d
Trim
sol
enoi
dM
ain
sole
noid
October 4-5, 20105
Magnetic Design – slotted correctors
• Performance improved by block design– Greater efficiency by placing turns closer
to midplane– Smaller losses between 0.5m patterns by
placing adjacent coils closer together• Radial space conserved by using 45°
patterns and placing vertical and horizontal dipoles at same radial position
October 4-5, 20106
Mechanical Design – Coils (1)
Goal 1• To support the 1700 psi radial force at 6T• Method:
– Provide a 6mm stainless steel support sleeve– Expand the sleeve at assembly by heating to 80°C
(0.3mm interference); 36000 psi tensile stress in sleeve– Taper the sleeve to coil (G10) mating surface by 8 mm to
facilitate installation
October 4-5, 20107
Mechanical Design – Coils (2)
Goal 2• To transmit the 133,000 LB. axial force from each outer coil
section around the main coil body.• Method
– Separate the outer coil sections with a spacer, but continuously wind inner and outer sections
– designed to transmit the load through the compression sleeve and the support tube.
October 4-5, 20108
Mechanical Design - Magnet
15 separate circuits / power lead pairs:
• 1 main solenoid
• 2 fringe field solenoids
• 5 0.5m vertical correctors
• 5 0.5m horizontal correctors
• 1 2.5m vertical corrector
• 1 2.5m horizontal corrector
Quench protection via cold diodes
Helium vessel cooled by liquid bath from RHIC supply
Outer heat shield actively cooled from 4K boil-off, inner shield conductively cooled
RHIC support posts / cryostat
October 4-5, 20109
Parts, Magnet Fabrication (“Make/Buy Plan”)
• Many components are available in stock, e.g.:– Corrector/Fringe field solenoid Superconductor – Stainless steel helium vessel– cryostat
• All remaining major components and materials to be purchased, e.g.:– Aluminum (corrector) and stainless (solenoid) support tubes
• Some parts to be fabricated in BNL machine shops, e.g.:• Corrector tube machining
• All tooling to be fabricated in BNL machine shops (subcontracted as needed)
• All subassembly work to be done at BNL• All coil fabrication, magnet assembly and testing to be performed
at BNL
October 4-5, 201010
Coil Fabrication
Test wind: feasibility + time study
Tube end insulation time study
Corrector Coils – “slotted tube”Expected benefits:Cost savingsTime (schedule) savingsReliable (proven) constructionImproved magnetic design
Smaller axial “gaps” reduce dips in fieldBlocks near midplane are more efficient → less turnsDecouples corrector construction from Direct Wind machines
Main solenoid – “direct wind”Expected benefits:accurate conductor placement using precision solenoid gantry developed for BEPC-II programUniform spacing improves field axis straightness, lessens demands on correctorsReliable (proven) construction
BEPC-II coil winding
October 4-5, 201011
Testing
• All coils undergo mechanical, electrical and magnetic inspections throughout the construction process as part of QA
• Coil and Yoke Assembly is cold tested in a vertical test dewar for quench performance before welding into cold mass vessel
• Cold mass vessel is pressure tested and leak checked before being installed into cryostat
• Magnet is measured magnetically at room temperature after cold test and surveyed at that time
October 4-5, 201012
Schedule Summary
Critical path shown in red
Superconductor paces work
fringe, corrector coils not on critical path
Meets 4/12 need date
October 4-5, 201013
Schedule Status
• Preliminary design - complete• Final design – 90% complete, working out final details to optimize magnetic
performance• Coil Fabrication:
– Corrector Coils: Superconductor available; purchase order for insulating with Kapton
placed, first shipment due end of October Aluminum support tube purchase order placed, tubes fabricated &
being shipped now Mechanical model / drawing for machined coil blocks in tube
complete, order being placed with BNL machine shop– Solenoid coils:
Superconductor order placed, delivery 12/2010 Support tube order placed Machined tube model /drawing complete, order to be placed with
BNL machine shop– Fringe field solenoid coils:
Same superconductor as corrector coils Final strength & proximity to main solenoid being finalized; parts to
be made by SMD immediately thereafter
October 4-5, 201014
Cost DetailsCost Details
Cost Estimate Methods:• Material:
– Actual cost for similar parts on previous programs– Vendor quotes on key items
• Labor:– Time studies for critical activities (coil winding, insulating,
etc.)
(see W. Fischer talk for other program costs)
Superconductor 84
Coil 89
Cold Mass 294
Magnet 636
Total 1103
ARRA funding
$KSuperconducting Solenoid Magnet
October 4-5, 201015
Risk Management
Coils are on critical path:– Early design specified direct wind of corrector coils;
competed for resources with solenoid coils.– Redesign of correctors as hand-wound block coils
saved schedule and cost, PLUS enabled work to be completed in parallel by alternate personnel
October 4-5, 201016
Value Engineering
• Use existing designs, materials, etc. wherever possible– Existing spare RHIC CQS cryostat– Surplus IsaBelle stainless steel helium vessels– Stock RHIC Ultem support posts
• Incorporation of Fringe Field Solenoid, Corrector Coils into superconducting magnet system:– Increased Solenoid costs, but reduced other eLens
program costs (i.e. change is cost neutral) and improved eLens performance
October 4-5, 201017
Project Team
• Scientist, Magnetic Design – Ramesh Gupta
• Mechanical Engineer, Magnet – Steve Plate
• Mechanical Engineer, Coils – Andy Marone
• Mechanical Engineer, Design – Paul Kovach
• Electrical Engineer, Coils – John Escallier
• Electrical Engineer, Tooling – Piyush Joshi
• Scientist, Magnetic Measurements – Animesh Jain
• Scientist, Cold Test – Joe Muratore
October 4-5, 201018
Environmental, Safety, Security, and Health (ESSH)
• Assigned ESSH representative – Steve Moss• Regular Safety inspections of Shop Floor• Safety review and approval on all drawings and
work procedures• Weekly safety meetings with staff
October 4-5, 201019
Quality Assurance
• Assigned QA representative – Ed Perez• QA review and approval on all drawings, work
procedures and purchase orders• Incoming inspection on all parts
– BNL (Magnet Division or Fabrication Services Division)
– At vendors before shipment or with delivery• Test / inspection points throughout the
construction process:– Mechanical– Electrical– Magnetic
October 4-5, 201020
How is Work Controlled?• PICS - Part and Inventory Control System• Developed at BNL Superconducting Magnet
Division• Windows-based software and database
Configuration Management
Features:Inventory control, including Lot or Serial #’s and locationCreation, approval and control of written work procedures with Revision controlKitting of parts for work ordersEnd item documentation, including as-built configuration
All QA, testing and safety precautions built into documentation
sample traveler
October 4-5, 201021
Summary
• The magnet requirements are challenging but achievable.
• Performance objectives reflect a good continued communication between SMD and C/AD; magnet is much better than original specification
• Work is started and is progressing in support of the Project Budget and Schedule
• Experienced personnel (RHIC AGS Snake, RHIC Helical, BEPC-II, LHC, etc.) are available and working