Objective FCM01

ESSIP Plan 2013

Octavian CIOARADSS/EIPR

13.09.2013

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Objective FCM01 2

Objective FCM01

• Comprehensive Explanation• What is new or has changed since LSSIP 2012• Link to European ATM Master Plan• Most important SLoA(s)• Finalisation Criteria and Closed Questions• ESSIP Report 2012• Objective Coordinator’s Analysis, recommendations, tips & tricks• Conclusions• Links and contacts

Comprehensive Explanation

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Overview LSSIP 2012 3

This Pan-European objective aims at enhancing tactical flow management services through the introduction of real-time aircraft position and meteorological data to optimise Air Traffic Flow and Capacity Management (ATFCM).

Area of applicability: All ECAC States

Initial Operational Capability (IOC): 08/2001Full Operational Capability (FOC): 12/2006

What is new or has changed since LSSIP 2012

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Overview LSSIP 2012 4

Due to its relationship with the EUR ATM MP, the type of the objective has changed from ECIP to SESAR

Link to European ATM Master Plan

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Overview LSSIP 2012 5

OI Step [IS-0102] – Improved Management of Flight Plan after Departure

Most important SLoA(s)

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Overview LSSIP 2012 6

ASP01 Supply ETFMS with Basic Correlated Position Data

ASP02 Supply ETFMS with Standard Correlated Position Data

ASP03 Receive and process ATFM data from the CFMU

ASP04 Inform CFMU of flight activations and estimates for ATFM purposes

Each SLoA should be fulfilled in accordance with the relevant provisions of the CFMU Flight Progress Messages document

Finalisation Criteria and Closed Questions

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Overview LSSIP 2012 7

Reception by CFMU of CPRs (in ASTERIX Category 062 format)

ATFM messages received from the CFMU are: • automatically correlated to the ATC Flight Plan data

• presented to the Air Traffic Controllers

Reception by CFMU of the FSA messages

No closed questions available

ESSIP Report 2012

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Overview LSSIP 2012 8

Objective late, but with a good level of implementation of the priority SLoAs.

The States yet to implement the priority SLoAs of this objective have shown a sound commitment to do so.

However, the likelihood of implementing all SLoAs still remains very low.

The main reason for delaying the implementation is of a technical nature and lack of operational justification. Implementation is mostly linked to the deployment of new systems or to major upgrades of existing ones, therefore the stand alone implementation of the objective was not considered beneficial.

Sometimes the objective is perceived as not being operationally justified at local level. However the implementation decisions shall also take into account the network benefits.

Objective Coordinator’s Analysis, recommendations, tips & tricks

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Overview LSSIP 2012 9

Implement the most important SLoA(s)• ASP01

• ASP02

• ASP03

• ASP04

When reporting, be more specific on what has been completed and the prospects for the rest of the SLoAs.

Ensure that there is an effective link with the NMD and the information on the implementation originates from a ODSG member.

Conclusions

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Overview LSSIP 2012 10

The implementation of this objective has a positive impact on:• The reduction of wasted capacity;

• The reduction of delays

• The reduction of unexpected overload situations

Note that the delivery to the NM of Correlated Position Reports containing the SSR transponder code assignments for GAT/IFR is an obligation on the Air Navigation Service Providers, under the NM IR (Commission Regulation (EU) No 677/2011)

Links and contacts

ESSIP Plan 2013 / Overview LSSIP 2012 11

Objective Coordinator: Octavian Cioara +32 2 729 3282

octavian.cioara@eurocontrol.int

NMD Objective Expert: J. Koolen +32 2 729 9876

johannes.koolen@eurocontrol.int