Ob Organizational Justice

download Ob Organizational Justice

of 27

Transcript of Ob Organizational Justice

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    1/27

    !"#$%&'$(&)%$* ,-.$/&)"

    Organizational

    Justice!"#$% '"% ()*+*, -"*.*/01234/56 #$ 73#,#8)30 9 -40),*00

    :; (*4+*,

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    2/27

    1. Self-interest versus Justice?

    2. Organizational justice: What and Why?

    3. How to influence perceived fairness?

    4. Perceived fairness directs motivation

    and shapes behavior

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    3/27

    What does the ultimatum game teach us?

    In some situations, humans value justice more than

    rational self-interest (Money talks, but it doesnt say it

    all)

    Rather than simply enjoying the benefits of receivedoutcomes, our satisfaction often depends upon a sense of

    whether outcome distributions are fair

    People are even willing to give up received outcomes to

    punish the unfair allocator

    This differentiates us from chimpanzees, who are more

    rational maximizers(Jensen, Call, & Tomasello, 2007)

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    4/27

    Concerns with justice are not restricted to humans

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiU6TxysCg

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    5/27

    Trust, cooperation, and interdependence

    Other chooses C Other chooses D

    You choose C

    You choose D

    + 3 !

    + 3 !

    - 6 !

    + 6 !

    + 6 !

    - 6 !

    - 1 !

    - 1 !

    Businesses and organizations have an interdependent rewardstructure because peoples outcomes depend on the decisions of

    others

    Social dilemma!Prisoner dilemma

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    6/27

    Trust, cooperation, and interdependence

    Two versions of the exact same prisoner dilemma game:

    The Wall Street Game:

    The Community Game:

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    7/27

    Trust, cooperation, and interdependence

    Two versions of the exact same prisoner dilemma game:

    The Wall Street Game:

    33% cooperators (67% defectors)

    The Community Game:

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    8/27

    Trust, cooperation, and interdependence

    Two versions of the exact same prisoner dilemma game:

    The Wall Street Game:

    33% cooperators (67% defectors)

    The Community Game:

    71% cooperators (29% defectors)

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    9/27

    Trust, cooperation, and interdependence

    Two versions of the exact same prisoner dilemma game:

    The Wall Street Game:

    33% cooperators (67% defectors)

    The Community Game:

    71% cooperators (29% defectors)

    The world as it is perceived, is the world that is behaviorally

    relevant (Robbins & Judge)

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    10/27

    1. Self-intrest or Justice?

    2. Organizational justice: What and Why?

    3. How to influence perceived fairness?

    4. Perceived fairness directs motivationand shapes behavior

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    11/27

    Toward a behavioral science of justice

    Prescriptive approach

    For centuries, justice has been the exclusive domain of

    philosophers (e.g., business ethics)

    What managers should do and should not do!What is fair managerial conduct?

    Discussion killer!everybody sticks to their own values

    Need for a less normative approach

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    12/27

    Descriptive approach to justice

    Examining actual managerial conduct and decision-making

    and how it is perceived by the parties affected by theiractions

    perceptions ofwhether or not organizational agents have

    acted fairly

    Understand why people view certain events as just or unjust,

    and what the consequences are that follow from theseevaluations

    Bounded rationality!bounded ethicality

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    13/27

    Two cases of handling organizational downsizing

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    14/27

    Why do employees care about justice?

    Personal (long range) considerations

    !Justice signals certainty/control regarding future treatments/

    benefits/outcomes

    Social considerations!Justice signals good relationships with the organization and its

    members. It shows that the organization and/or supervisor valuesyou

    Ethical considerations! Justice is the morally appropriate way others should be treated

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    15/27

    Three components of justice

    Distributive justice:Perceived fairness of the amount and allocation of rewards/punishments (equity, equality, need)

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    16/27

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    17/27

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    18/27

    Three components of justice

    Distributive justice:Perceived fairness of the amount and allocation of rewards/punishments (equity, equality, need)

    Proceduraljustice

    Perceived fairness of the process used to determine the distribution

    of these outcomes (voice, accuracy, consistency etc.)

    !quality of the decision-making process Interactionaljustice

    The extent to which one considers to be treated with dignity,

    concern, and respect (quality of interpersonal treatment )

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    19/27

    When are procedures/interactions seen as fair?

    1.

    Voice/input in the decision process

    Am I listened to?

    Does my opinion matter?

    2.

    How decisions are made and implemented

    Are decisions based on accurate information?

    Are procedures applied in a consistent manner?

    Is self-interest corrected for?

    Am I getting advanced notice of changes?

    Is the decision process transparent?

    3. How decision-makers behave

    Is the why of decisions explained?

    Am I treated with dignity and respect?

    Is there active listening to my worries and is my perspective/situationtaken into consideration?

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    20/27

    Perceived injustice versus perceived justice

    Relevant to wide range of managerial tasksHiring,reward systems, conflict management, layoffs, performance

    appraisal

    Influence on employee behaviorPerceived injustice

    retaliation, decreased performance and morale

    Perceived justice

    cooperation, increased performance and trust

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    21/27

    1. Self-intrest or Justice?

    2. Organizational justice: What and Why?

    3. How to influence perceived fairness?

    4. Perceived fairness directs motivationand shapes behavior

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    22/27

    Power, Focus, and Motivation

    High power: WHAT

    focus on the outcomes (What do I want to get done?)

    !goal-setting

    Low power: HOW & WHY

    focus on how to obtain those outcomes and why it matters

    (How do I proceed to get it done? Why is it important ?)

    !goal-striving

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    23/27

    Results in a common problem:

    Mismatch between what managers and subordinates

    regard as fair!

    Managers tend to overemphasize outcome information,

    whereas subordinates are more interested inprocessinformation

    As a result, managers often are seen as less fair than they

    consider themselves to be

    Thus, it is not enough for a manager to be fair. A manager

    should act in ways that subordinates can recognize as fair

    !Take subordinates perspective

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    24/27

    1. Self-interest or Justice?

    2. Organizational justice: What and Why?

    3. How to influence perceived fairness?

    4. Perceived fairness directs motivation

    and shapes behavior

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    25/27

    Decision compliance versus decision support

    Process fairness influences motivation, even when decisions

    include unfavorable outcomes for oneself

    Low PF makes recipients only comply with decisions: Doing only what is minimally required (in-role behavior)

    The energizing source of motivation lies outside of the agent

    High PF makes them support decisions:

    Doing more than what is required (extra-role behavior)

    The energizing source of motivation lies within the agent

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    26/27

    Social exchange

    Justice Organizational Citizenship Behavior

    !More effective organizational functioning

  • 8/10/2019 Ob Organizational Justice

    27/27

    Justice matters more than ever!

    Justice is even more important in times of uncertainty andhardship

    If you think of yourself as an agent of change, you have a

    chance to really make a difference now Moreover, managers who act fairly evoke the same

    conduct in others and have a huge impact on

    organizational functioning as a whole