NUR FAZIRAH BINTI JUMARI -...
Transcript of NUR FAZIRAH BINTI JUMARI -...
1
MELT FLOW INDEX ESTIMATION USING NEURAL NETWORK
MODELS FOR PROPYLENE POLYMERIZATION PROCESS
NUR FAZIRAH BINTI JUMARI
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
i
MELT FLOW INDEX ESTIMATION USING NEURAL NETWORK MODELS
FOR PROPYLENE POLYMERIZATION PROCESS
NUR FAZIRAH BINTI JUMARI
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of
Master of Engineering (Chemical)
Faculty of Chemical Engineering
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
DECEMBER 2013
iii
To Allah~ for guiding me to the straight path,
To my other half~ for love, understanding, and support
To my sunshine~ for being with me along this journey
To family members, lecturers, close friends~ for endless care and assistances
and
Those people who have guided and inspired me throughout my journey of
education and life
Thank you
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Alhamdulillah, thank to Him for guiding me, and leading me to the straight
path. In completing this research, there were lots of hurdles, challenges and
tremendous obstacles that I had to endure. This research would not have been
possible without the support of many people. So, I would like to express my
heartfelt appreciation to all those who have contributed directly and indirectly
towards my completion of this research.
I am very indebted to my research project supervisor, Associate Professor
Dr. Khairiyah Mohd Yusof, thanks to her detailed and constructive comments, and
for her important supports throughout this work. My warmest gratitude extends to
the Ministry of Science, Technology and the Innovation (MOSTI) for funding my
research through National Science Fellowship (NSF) scholarship.
My sincere appreciation also extends to my other half, Mohammad Nazri
bin Ngadinin for his endless love, understanding, and never ending support through
the duration of my studies. A load of my love goes to my dear sunshine, Khaulah
Mumtazah for her existence in my life. I owe my loving thanks to my parents and
families. Thank you for their loving support and being patient with me. My special
gratitude is due to my study circle mates, without their encouragement and pray, it
would have been impossible for me to finish this work. Lastly, I offer my regards
and blessings to all of those who supported me in any respect during the
completion of the research.
v
ABSTRACT
One of the major challenges in polymerization industry is the lack of online
instruments to measure polymer end-used properties such as melt flow index
(MFI). As an alternative to the online instruments and conventional laboratory
tests, these properties can be estimated by using a model based-soft sensor. This
research presents models for soft sensors to measure MFI in industrial
polypropylene loop reactors by using the artificial neural network (ANN), hybrid
FP-ANN (HNN) and stacked neural network (SNN) models. The ANN model of
the two loop reactors was developed by employing the concept of Feed-Forward
Back Propagation (FFBP) network architecture using Levenberg-Marquardt
training method. Serial hybrid FP-ANN (HNN) models were developed in this
study. The error between actual MFI and simulation MFI from FP model was fed
into the HNN model as one of the input variables. To construct the stacked neural
network (SNN) model, two layers were needed: 1) level-0 generalizer output
comes from a number of diverse ANN models and 2) level-1 generalizer was
developed using the results of level-0 generalizer with additional input variables.
All models were developed and simulated in MATLAB 2009a environment. The
simulation results of the MFI based on the ANN, HNN, and SNN models were
compared and analyzed. The HNN model is the best model in predicting all range
of MFI with the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) value, 0.010848, followed
by ANN model (RMSE=0.019366) and SNN model (RMSE=0.059132). When
these three models (ANN, HNN, and SNN) were compared, the SNN model shows
the lower RMSE for each type of MFI studied.
vi
ABSTRAK
Salah satu cabaran utama dalam industri pempolimeran ialah kekurangan
instrumen dalam talian untuk mengukur sifat-sifat akhir polimer seperti indeks
aliran lebur (MFI). Sebagai alternatif kepada instrumen dalam talian dan ujian
makmal konvensional, sifat-sifat ini boleh dianggarkan menggunakan model
berasaskan soft sensor. Kajian ini mempersembahkan model yang digunakan di
dalam soft sensor untuk mengukur MFI di dalam reaktor gegelung industri
pempolimeran propena menggunakan model Artificial Neural Network (ANN),
model hibrid FP-ANN (HNN) dan model Stacked Neural Network (SNN). Model
ANN bagi dua reaktor gegelung telah dibangunkan dengan menggunakan konsep
Feed-Forward Back Propagation (FFBP) melalui kaedah latihan Levenberg-
Marquardt. Model HNN bersiri telah dibangunkan juga dalam kajian ini. Ralat
antara MFI yang dijana oleh model FP dan nilai MFI yang sebenar digunakan
sebagai salah satu masukan untuk model HNN. Untuk membangunkan model
SNN, dua tahap diperlukan: 1) keluaran dari level-0 generalizer datang dari
pelbagai jenis model ANN dan 2) generalizer level-1 dibangunkan menggunakan
keputusan dari level-0 yang dibina. Kesemua model telah dibangunkan dan
disimulasikan di dalam persekitaran MATLAB 2009a. Keputusan simulasi MFI
dari model ANN, HNN, dan SNN dibandingkan dan dianalisis. Model HNN adalah
model yang terbaik jika mengukur semua nilai MFI dengan nilai root mean square
error (RMSE) sebanyak 0.010848, diikuti dengan model ANN (RMSE=0.019366)
dan model SNN (RMSE=0.059132). Jika ketiga-tiga model (ANN, HNN dan SNN)
ini dibandingkan, model SNN menunjukkan nilai RMSE yang rendah bagi
mengukur setiap jenis MFI yang dikaji.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
DECLARATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES x
LIST OF FIGURES xii
LIST OF ABBREVIATION xiv
LIST OF APPENDICES xvii
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Project Background 1
1.2 Problem Statement 3
1.3 Research Objective 4
1.4 Research Scope 4
1.5 Research Contribution 5
1.6 Summary of Chapter 1 6
2 LITERATURE REVIEW ON PROPYLENE
POLYMERIZATION
7
2.1 Introduction 7
2.2 What Is Polymer? 8
viii
2.3 What Is Polypropylene? 8
2.4 The Resin Characteristics 9
2.5 Commercial Types of Polypropylenes 10
2.6 Industrial Manufacturing of Polypropylene 12
2.6.1 Spheripol Process 17
2.6.2 Mechanism of Polypropylene Polymer 19
2.7 Summary of Chapter 2 24
3 LITERATURE REVIEW ON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL
NETWORK, HYBRID NEURAL NETWORK AND
STACKED NEURAL NETWORKS MODELS
25
3.1 Introduction 25
3.2 Soft Sensor 26
3.3 Artificial Neural Network Model (Black box
Model)
27
3.3.1 Basic Elements of Neural Network 28
3.3.2 Network Topology 31
3.3.3 Network Training and Validation 32
3.3.4 Neural Network Model in Polymerization
Process
34
3.3.5 Limitation of Neural Network 35
3.4 Hybrid Neural Network Model (Grey box Model) 36
3.4.1 The Need of Hybrid Modeling 38
3.4.2 Hybrid Model in Polymerization Process 39
3.5 Stacked Neural Network Model 42
3.5.1 Stacked Neural Network Model in
Polymerization Process
44
3.6 Summary of Chapter 3 45
4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 46
4.1 Stages in Research 46
4.2 Process Description 50
4.3 Data Filtering 51
ix
4.4 Development, simulation and validation of ANN
Model
52
4. 5 Development, simulation and validation of Hybrid
Neural Network Model
59
4.6 Stacked Neural Network 64
4.7 Estimation MFI using different models (ANN,
HNN, and SNN Models)
68
4.8 Summary of Chapter 4 69
5 RESULT AND DISCUSSION 70
5.1 Introduction 70
5.2 Artificial Neural Network Model to Predict MFI 71
5.2.1 Pruning The Input Variables 73
5.3 Hybrid FP-ANN Model to Predict MFI 75
5.4 Comparison of FP Model, ANN Model and Hybrid
Model
78
5.5 Single model to predict all types of MFI 84
5.5.1 Comparison of ANN, HNN, and SNN model 86
5.6. Summary of Chapter 5 88
6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 90
6.1 Conclusion 90
6.2 Recommendations 91
REFERENCES 93
Appendices A-D 100-126
x
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
2.1 Industrial Process Technologies for PP Manufacture 15
2.2 Kinetic Model (Zacca and Ray, 1993) 23
4.1 Variables required in developing all the models 49
4.2 Input and Output Variables of the Network 54
4.3 Data distributions for ANN and HNN 57
4.4 Summary of model equations 61
4.5 Input and Output Variables of the Network for HNN
Model
62
4.6 Data distribution for Stacked Neural Network 64
4.7 RMSE of level-0 neural network model 66
4.8 Input and output variables for level-1 Stacked Neural
Network
67
5.1 The MFI Grades 70
xi
5.2 The Performance of the ANN Model 72
5.3 The Performance of the ANN Model after
Pruning Input Variables
74
5.4 The Performance of Hybrid FP-ANN Models 77
5.5 Comparison between ANN Model and HNN Model 79
5.6 Data distributions to develop single ANN and HNN
models
84
5.7 RMSE of level-0 neural network model 85
5.8 The performance of single model 86
5.9 New input and output variables for Level-1 Stacked
neural network
87
5.10 The performance of the models 88
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO TITLE PAGE
2.1 Classification of PP manufacturing processes 16
2.2 Process Flow Diagram of Industrial Loop Reactor
(Jamaludin,2009 and Harun, 2009)
18
2.3 The mechanism of Ziegler-Natta System 21
3.1 Product quality measurement 26
3.2 Architecture of neural network 29
3.3 The example of artificial neurons 30
3.4 Different types of transfer function 31
3.5 Topology of feed forward and recurrent network 32
3.6 Two approaches used in hybrid neural network with
First principle (Ng and Hussain, 2004)
38
3.7 Stacked generalization (Sridhar and Seagrave,1996) 43
4.1 Overall research methodology 47
xiii
4.2 Process Flow Diagram of Industrial Loop Reactor
with modelling boundary (Harun, 2009 and
Jamaludin,2009)
50
4.3 Effect of a moving average filter 52
4.4 The steps in neural network model development 53
4.5 Feed-forward neural network 55
4.6 Building a Neural Network Model 56
4.7 The steps in hybrid neural network model
development
59
4.8 Serial hybrid neural network (HNN) model 60
4.9 Stacked neural network 67
5.1 The result of the best model to predict MFI A 80
5.2 The result of the best model to predict MFI B 81
5.3 The result of the best model to predict MFI C 82
xiv
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ai - Input vector
ANN - Artificial neural network
bj - Output vector
C3 - Propylene
iHC - hydrogen concentration in reactor i (kgmol/m
3)
iMC - monomer concentration in reactor i (kgmol/m
3)
iPC
0 - catalyst active site concentration in reactor i (kgmol/m
3)
iSD
C - catalyst dead site concentration in reactor i (kgmol/m3)
iTC - cocatalyst concentration in reactor i (kgmol/m
3)
CSTR - continuous stirred-tank reactor
Dr - dead polymer chains
E - activation energy (J/mol)
i
MF - monomer mass flowrate into reactor i (kg/hr)
FP - First principle
H2 - Hydrogen
ICA - independent combining analysis
kA - site activation kinetic constant (m3/kgmol/s)
kP - polymer propagation kinetic constant (m3/kgmol/s)
kTH - chain transfer to hydrogen kinetic constant (m3/kgmol/s)
kTM - chain transfer to monomer kinetic constant (m3/kgmol/s)
kTT - chain transfer to cocatalyst kinetic constant (m3/kgmol/s)
kTS - spontaneous chain transfer to hydrogen kinetic constant
(1/s)
kD - site deactivation kinetic constant (1/s)
xv
K buffer factor of the reactors
M - number of points used in the moving average
MFI - melt flow index (g/10min)
MSA - multi-scale analysis
MMW - molecular weight of monomer (kgmol/kg)
MWD - molecular weight distribution
NAMW - number average molecular weight
PET - polyethylene terephthalate
P0/P0f - Outlet/ inlet active catalyst site concentration
PP - polypropylene
iPPPR - production rate of polypropylene in reactor i (kg/hr)
Pr - live polymer chains
PSD - Particle size distribution
iinQ - inlet volumetric flowrate into reactor i (m
3/hr)
ioutQ - outlet volumetric flowrate from reactor i (m
3/hr)
RAE - Rate of site activation by electron donor
RAM - Rate of site activation by monomer
RAS - Rate of spontaneous site activation
RP0 - Rate of initiation
RPR - Rate of propagation
RTM - Rate of chain transfer to monomer
RTH - Rate of chain transfer to hydrogen
RTS - Rate of spontaneous chain transfer
RD - Rate of site deactivation
RTC - Rate of chain transfer to co-catalyst
RTE - Rate of chain transfer to electron donor
RD - Rate of spontaneous site decativation
RDH - Rate of site deactivation by hydrogen
SP - Pure catalyst site
TEAL - Triethylaluminium
iρ - polymer slurry density inside reactor i (kg/m3)
iinρ - inlet polymer slurry density inside reactor i (kg/m
3)
xvi
iMρ - density of monomer in reactor i (kg/m
3)
iPPρ - density of polypropylene in reactor i (kg/m
3)
iPPγ - specific gravity of polypropylene in recator i
iψ0 - zeroth moment of live polymer chains in reactor i
iψ1 - first moment of live polymer chains in reactor i
iψ2 - second moment of live polymer chains in reactor i
iλ0 - zeroth moment of dead polymer chains in reactor i
iλ1 - first moment of dead polymer chains in reactor i
iλ2 - second moment of dead polymer chains in reactor i
i - reactor, i = 1, 2
j - polymer moments, j = 0th
, 1st, 2
nd
H - hydrogen
in - inlet
M - monomer
out - outlet
PP - polypropylene
T - cocatalyst
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Background
Product quality is an important feature in the globally competitive polymer
industry (Jianli et. al, 2002). With the skyrocketing cost of raw material and energy,
stringent measures must be taken to meet quality requirements to remain
competitive. According to Ray (1986), product quality is a much more complex issue
in polymerization than in more conventional short reactions. Polymers are produced
in various grades, according to customer needs. To meet customer requirements at an
economically attractive cost, product quality measurement is therefore a necessity.
However, not all variables can be measured directly. Due to the limitations of
measurement device, it is often difficult to estimate important process variables such
as product concentration and melt flow index (MFI). Polymer qualities often have to
be evaluated in a time consuming and manpower intensive lab analysis. Thus, there
is a need to find methods to estimate the product quality in real time.
2
Polymerization reactors are very well known for their complexity especially
with regards to reactor design, polymerization recipes, uncertain reaction kinetics,
and highly exothermic reaction, which lead to difficulty in product quality control.
Developing suitable models are therefore necessary to estimate the essential
variables necessary for measurement, control or optimization. For example,
polypropylene (PP) which is normally produced in the loop reactors is one of the
most complex process and varied because it involves the types of catalyst, the kind of
reactor, and the effect of the recycle loop (M. Kim et al., 2005). The articles reported
by Uvarov and Tsevetkova (1974), Lepski and Inkov (1977) and a number of other
authors (Zacca and Ray, 1993; Debling et al., 1994; Soares, 2001; Jiang et al., 2002;
Wei et al., 2002; Reginato et al., 2003; Luo et al., 2007; and Lucca et al., 2008) are
some the significant researches in the polymerization modeling for loop reactors.
The Himont Spheripol process is one of the most widely used polymerization
process that produce polyolefin using the loop reactors. This process takes place in
the loop reactors filled with liquid propylene. A small loop reactor is used to
prepolymerize the catalyst; the main polymerization, for homopolymer or random
copolymer, takes place in one or two loop reactors. For impact copolymer production
a gas phase reactor is requested after the loop reactors.
The ability to produce polymer resins which meet customer quality demands
is the primary aim of the polymer industry. To meet customer requirements at an
economically attractive cost, product quality measurement is therefore a necessity.
Soft sensor is one of the possible solutions where the values of the desired variables
which cannot be measured are inferred from the measured variables using the
process model. Development of inferential systems for polymer properties is a very
active research area in polymerization reactor control (Chan et al., 1993; Chan and
Nascimento, 1994; McAuley et al.,1990; McAuley and MacGregor, 1991;
Kiparissides et al., 1993; Zabisky et al., 1992; Skagerberg et al., 1992, Gonzaga
et.al., 2009 etc.).
3
According to R. Sharmin et. al.,(2006), the model used to estimate polymer
properties can be roughly categorized into three groups: (1) mechanistic model
developed from first principles (for example, Chan et al., 1993; McAuley et al.,1990,
Kiparissides et al., 1993; Zabisky et al., 1992), (2) black-box model using neural
networks (Bhat and McAvoy, 1990; Chan and Nascimento, 1994; Qin and McAvoy,
1992; Rallo et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 1997, etc.), and (3) statistical model using
multivariate statistical tools (Jaeckle and MacGregor, 1998; Kiparissides et al., 1993;
MacGregor et al., 1994; Martin et al., 1999; Skagerberg et al., 1992).
M. Kim et al., (2005) developed a soft sensor in polypropylene process based
on hybrid modelling of novel clustering and black-box as well as mechanistic
models. Meanwhile, T. Yiagopoulos et al., (2004) also developed a soft sensor with a
neural network approach for monitoring polymer melt flow index (MFI) at the Basell
Spheripol process.
1.2 Problem Statement
The major problem faced by the polymerization industry is that the resin
characteristics that define polymer quality, such as melt flow index (MFI) and
density cannot be measured on-line. Properties, such as MFI, are difficult to measure
and usually unavailable in real time since it requires close human intervention (R.
Sharmin et al., 2006). They can only be measured off-line in the laboratory, which
leads to difficulty in controlling product quality in polymerization processes because
of the delay involved before the product quality is known. Consequently, in most
plants, MFI is measured only several times a day using a manual analytical test.
Products which do not meet the specifications must either be sold off at a reduced
price or wasted. This does not only cause loss of revenue, but also resources, such as
raw material, production time and energy.
4
Therefore, an on-line product quality measurement, such as MFI, is essential
in fulfilling customer requirements and preventing losses. Since sensors are not
available to measure MFI, developing a soft sensor is the next best alternative. Soft
sensors are inferential estimators, drawing conclusions from process observations
when hardware sensors are unavailable or unsuitable. A suitable, fast and robust
process model for the polymerization reactor is required so that the MFI can be
estimated from the model.
1.3 Research Objective
The purpose of this research is to develop the Himont Spheripol Process
model for propylene polymerization that can be a model as a soft sensor. The Himont
Spheripol process model is developed to predict end-use product quality, melt flow
index (MFI), by using the artificial neural network (ANN) model, hybrid neural
network (HNN) model and stacked neural network (SNN) model.
1.4 Research Scope
The study in developing the models for a soft sensor for polypropylene loop
reactors to produce homopolymer of Himont Spheripol Process has been identified as
follows:
a) Develop and simulate the different types of neural network models (ANN,HNN
and SNN) for polyproplylene loop reactors in MATLAB 2009a environment
using industrial data collected from polypropylene plant in Johor.
5
b) Use the models developed (ANN, HNN, and SNN model) to estimate the different
grades of MFI.
c) Validate the simulation results with MFI from industrial polypropylene plant data.
d) Compare the performance of the models developed (ANN, HNN, and SNN
model) in predicting the MFI values.
1.5 Research Contribution
Major contribution in this study is the development of the models (ANN,
HNN and SNN model) for a soft sensor to measure melt flow index of propylene
polymerization process in loop reactors. The development of a comprehensive
mathematical model is an essential task in understanding the polymerization
processes and translating the best of our knowledge about the interactions of
different factors that affect the system. The developed, programmed and simulated
process model for the soft sensors provides a basic study that can be used and
improved in further study which related to bulk propylene polymerization, such as
process optimization and process control. The process model also provides an
understanding of the dynamic behaviour of propylene polymerization in loop
reactors from an industry perspective.
Another contribution is to compare and determine the best models for a soft
sensor that can be utilized in describing the propylene polymerization process. The
models are very useful as a guide in industry to help the engineers and operators
understand the process clearly for the purpose of plant monitoring and
troubleshooting as well as operator training.
6
1.6 Summary of Chapter 1
Producing polymer is a complex and difficult process. The polymer is
produced in various grades according to customer requirement at an economically
attractive cost. However, it is often difficult to estimate or measure important process
variables such as melt flow index (MFI). MFI always often have to be evaluated in a
time consuming and manpower intensive lab analysis. They can only be measured
off-line in the laboratory, which leads to difficulty in controlling product quality in
polymerization processes because of the delay involved before the MFI value is
known. Consequently, products which do not meet the specifications must either be
sold off at a reduced price or wasted. This does not only cause loss of revenue, but
also resources, such as raw material, production time and energy. Thus, there is a
need to find methods to estimate the melt flow index in real time. Therefore, an on-
line MFI measurement is essential in fulfilling customer requirements and preventing
losses. The purpose of this research is to develop the Himont Spheripol Process
model for propylene polymerization that can be a model as a soft sensor. The Himont
Spheripol process takes place in the loop reactors filled with liquid propylene. The
Himont Spheripol process model is developed to predict end-use product quality,
melt flow index (MFI), by using artificial neural network (ANN) model, hybrid
neural network (HNN) model and stacked neural network (SNN) model.
99
99
Zacca, J. J. & Ray, W. H. (1993). Modelling of the liquid phase polymerization of
olefins in loop reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 48 (22), 3743-3765.
Zahedi, G., Elkamel, A., Lohi, A., Jahanmiri, A., & Rahimpor, M. R. (2005). Hybrid
artificial neural network—First principle model formulation for the unsteady
state simulation and analysis of a packed bed reactor for CO2 hydrogenation
to methanol. Chemical Engineering Journal, 115(1–2), 113-120.
Zhang, J., Martin, E.B., Morris, A.J., & Kiparissides, C., (1997).Inferential
estimation of polymer quality using stacked neural networks. Computers
and Chemical Engineering 21 (Suppl), S1025–S1030.
Zhang, J. (2008). Batch-to-batch optimal control of a batch polymerisation process
based on stacked neural network models. Chemical Engineering Science,
63(5), 1273-1281.