Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

download Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

of 60

Transcript of Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    1/60

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    2/60

    Diferentiation orSpecial Education in aCommon Core WorldEvaluating All Teachers o AllLearners

    Sharen BertrandoPeter Koi! Ph"D"

    Special Education #esourceAssistant Proessor

    Development Specialist

    Keu!a College

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    3/60

    What$s on their plate%

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    4/60

    Ta!e A&a's

    (" All students) students &ith disa*ilities +SWD,and English Language Learners +ELL,included) should *e read' or learning in anenvironment &here the' eel &elcomed) at

    ease) and comorta*le"-" When discussing teacher perormance) therea multiple rame&or!s or the conversationsa*out learning or all students"

    ." /ood teaching is good teaching) no matterthe pro0le o the student"

    1" /ood teaching needs modeling) support andnurturance"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    5/60

    Purpose

    To e2plain and enhance evaluator$s a*ilit'to help gro& teachers$ !no&ledge) s!ills)and a*ilities regarding the learning o allstudents through access to the CommonCore Standards"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    6/60

    /reater diversit' and

    accounta*ilit' #esponsi*ilit' o administrators) teachers

    to ensure that all students reaches highest

    level o achievement #esponsi*ilit' or students &ith disa*ilitiesto demonstrate progress in generaleducation curriculum

    #esponsi*ilit' or students &ith 0rstlanguage other than English

    #esponsi*ilit' or students &ho don$t 0tthe mold

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    7/60

    3mportance o the sharedvalues

    There are 4"5 million students &ith disa*ilitiesin the 6"S"

    The challenges or these students include7 89: o all schools in the 6nited Statesthat &ere cited as ailing to achieve A;P did

    so *ecause their students &ithdisa*ilities ailed to achieve A;P" 3n -99

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    8/60

    8

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    9/60

    Domain 1: Planning and

    Preparation(a7 Demonstrating Kno&ledgeo Content and Pedagog'(*7 Demonstrating Kno&ledgeo Students(c7 Setting 3nstructional

    =utcomes(d7 Demonstrating Kno&ledgeand #esources(e7 Designing Coherent3nstruction(7 Designing Student

    Assessments

    Domain 2: Classroom Environment

    -a7 Creating an Environment o #espectand #apport-*7 Esta*lishing a Culture or Learning-c7 >anaging Classroom Procedures-d7 >anaging Student Behavior-e7 =rganiing Ph'sical Space

    Domain 3: Instruction.a7 Communicating &ithStudents.*7 6sing ?uestioning and

    Discussion [email protected] Engaging Students in

    Domain 4: ProfessionalResponsibilities1a7 #eecting on Teaching1*7 >aintaining Accurate #ecords

    1c7 Communicating &ith amilies1d7 Participating in a Proessional

    Danielson$s rame&or! or ProessionalPractice

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    10/60

    ;S6T$s rame&or!

    or Proessional PracticeStandard I: no!ledge ofStudents and Student "earning

    3"(7 demonstrating !no&ledge ochild and adolescent development3"-7 research*ased !no&ledge o

    learning and language ac@uisitiontheories and processes"3".7 !no&ledge o and response todiverse learning needs) interests)and e2periences o all students"3"17 !no&ledge o and are responsiveto the economic) social) cultural)linguistic) amil') and communit'actors that inuence their students$learning"3"57 !no&ledge and understanding otechnological and inormationliterac' and ho& the' afect student

    learning"

    Standard II: no!ledge of Content andInstructional Planning

    33"(7 !no&ledge o the content the' teach)including relationships among centralconcepts) tools o in@uir') andF structuresand current developments &ithin theirdiscipline+s,"33"-7 understand ho& to connect conceptsacross disciplines and engage learners incritical and innovative thin!ing andcolla*orative pro*lem solving related to real&orld conte2ts"33".7 use a *road range o instructionalstrategies to ma!e su*Gect matter accessi*le"33"17 esta*lish goals and e2pectations or allstudents that are aligned &ith learningstandards and allo& or multiple path&a's toachievement"33"57 design relevant instruction that connectsstudents$ prior understanding ande2periences to ne& !no&ledge"33"47 evaluate and utilie curricular materials

    and other appropriate resources to promotestudent success in meeting learning goals"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    11/60

    ;S6T$s rame&or!

    or Proessional PracticeStandard III: InstructionalPractice333"(7 research*ased practices and evidence ostudent learning or developmentall'appropriate and standardsdriven instructionthat motivates and engages students"

    333"-7 communicate clearl' and accuratel' &ithstudents to ma2imie their understanding andlearning"333".7 high e2pectations and create challenginglearning e2periences or students"333"17 e2plore and use a variet' o instructionalapproaches) resources) and technologies tomeet diverse learning needs) engage students

    and promote achievement"333"57 engage students in the development omultidisciplinar' s!ills) such ascommunication) colla*oration) critical thin!ing)and use o technolog'"333"47 monitor and assess student progress) see!and provide eed*ac!) and adapt instruction tostudent needs"

    Standard I#: "earningEnvironment3H"(7 create a mutuall' respectul)sae) and supportive learning

    environment that is inclusive oever' student"3H"-7 create an intellectuall'challenging and stimulatinglearning environment"3H".7 manage the learning

    environment or the efectiveoperation o the classroom"3H"17 organie and utilie availa*leresources to create a sae andproductive learning environment"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    12/60

    ;S6T$s rame&or!

    or Proessional PracticeStandard #: $ssessment forStudent "earningH"(7 design) adapt) select) and use a rangeo assessment tools and processes tomeasure and document student learning

    and gro&th"H"-7 understand) anal'e) interpret) and useassessment data to monitor studentprogress and to plan and diferentiateinstruction"H".7 communicate inormation a*out variouscomponents o the assessment s'stem"H"17 reect upon and evaluate the

    efectiveness o their comprehensiveassessment s'stem to adGust assessmentand plan instruction accordingl'"H"57 prepare students to understand theormat and directions o assessments usedand the criteria *' &hich the students &ill*e evaluated"

    Standard #I: ProfessionalResponsibilities andCollaborationH3"(7 uphold proessional standards opractice and polic' as related to students$

    rights and teachers$ responsi*ilities"H3"-7 engage and colla*orate &ithcolleagues and the communit' to developand sustain a common culture that supportshigh e2pectations or student learning"H3".7 communicate and colla*orate &ithamilies) guardians) and caregivers toenhance student development and success"H3"17 manage and perorm noninstructionalduties in accordance &ith school districtguidelines or other applica*le e2pectations"H3"57 understand and compl' &ith relevantla&s and policies as related to students$rights and teachers$ responsi*ilities"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    13/60

    ;S6T$s rame&or!

    or Proessional PracticeStandard #II: Professional%ro!t&H33"(7 reect on practice to improve

    instructional efectiveness and guideproessional gro&th"H33"-7 set goals or and engage inongoing proessional developmentneeded to continuousl' improveteaching competencies"

    H33".7 communicate and colla*orate&ith students) colleagues) otherproessionals) and the communit' toimprove practice"H33"17 remain current in their !no&ledgeo content and pedagog' *' utiliing

    proessional resources"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    14/60

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    15/60

    IThe Standards should also *e read asallo&ing or the &idest possi*le range

    o students to participate ull' rom theoutset and as permitting appropriateaccommodations to ensure ma2imum

    participation o students &ith specialeducation needs"J

    Commitment to Students &ith

    Disa*ilities Evident inStandards

    ELA Standards) in section titled IWhat is not coveredJ

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    16/60

    IStudents &ith disa*ilitiesmust *echallenged to e2cel &ithin the general

    curriculum and *e prepared or successin their postschool lives) includingcollege andor careers"Thereore) howthese high standards are taught and

    assessed is o the utmost importance inreaching this diverse group o students"J

    Application to

    Students &ith Disa*ilities

    ELA Standards) in section titled IWhat is not coveredJ

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    17/60

    Common Core StateStandards

    Rigorous

    Knowledge and skillsGlobally completive

    Clear and consistentLogical progression

    Multi-state Collaborative

    Universal esign !or Learning

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    18/60

    Shared #esponsi*ilit'

    Ta!ing o&nership o all students

    Providing opportunities or proessionaldevelopment M general and special

    education together Creating a culture &here all students are

    general education students 0rst " " " isthe 0rst hurdle to meeting the challenge

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    19/60

    Brain #esearch) Technolog')and 6niversal Design orLearning 3nsights rom *rain research e& technolog' tools

    Common Core Standards

    6niversal Design or Learning

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    20/60

    Learner Diversit'Brain et&or!s that Support

    Learning1'

    Recognition(et!or)s

    2'Strategic (et!or)s

    3'$*ective (et!or)s

    The IWhatJ oLearning

    The INo&J oLearning

    The IWh'J oLearning

    3denti' and interpretsound) light) taste)smell) and touch

    3denti' andunderstandinormation) ideas)and concepts

    The a*ilit' to plan)e2ecute) and monitoractions and s!ills

    The a*ilit' to engagein actions and s!ills)set priorities and

    evaluate

    David #ose Ph"D") CA

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    21/60

    Supports or Student Diverse#ecognition et&or!s

    E+amples 6nderlininghighlighting

    Herticallinesasteris!sdoodlesnum*ers O margin

    Provide multiplemediaormats

    IChun!ingJ inormation

    /raphic =rganiers

    Provide multiple e2amples Support *ac!ground

    conte2t

    The IWhatJ o Learning

    3denti' and interpretsound) light) taste) smell)and touch 3denti' andunderstand inormation)ideas) and concepts

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    22/60

    Supports or Student DiverseStrategic et&or!s

    E+amples, >ultimedia or student

    e2pression +video) audio)te2t) dra&ing,

    M Concept mapping toolsM Scafolds and prompts

    M Chec!lists

    M Em*edded coaches and

    mentors) peer tutorsM Assessment ru*rics or

    students

    The INo&J o Learning

    The a*ilit' to plan)e2ecute) and monitoractions and s!ills

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    23/60

    Supports or Student DiverseAfective et&or!s

    E+amplesM Choice aforded

    M Age appropriate activities

    M Culturall' relevant

    activitiesM Chartsschedulesvisi*le

    timers

    M Displa' o goals

    M /roup &or!colla*oration

    M Personal Gournal

    The IWh'J o Learning

    The a*ilit' to engage inactions and s!ills) setpriorities and evaluate

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    24/60

    David #ose) ounder o CAST

    Brain et&or!s Learner Haria*ilit'

    http7udlonline"cast"orgpagemodule(l(54

    -1

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    25/60

    Learner varia*ilit' is the norm

    http7udlseries"udlcenter"orgpresentationslearnerQvaria*ilit'"html%

    plistRe2plore

    Learners var' inthe &a's the'ta!e ininormation

    Learners var' intheir a*ilities andapproaches

    Learning changes

    *' situation andconte2t

    Learners var'across theirdevelopment

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    26/60

    Pass the Pro0le

    >eet " " "

    >adison Christian

    EliGah

    Charles

    Kalani

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    27/60

    The Brain

    No& can educators *etter understand

    student varia*ilit'%

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    28/60

    Thin! " " "

    What other rames or discussion are

    important or educators to !no& a*out the*rain and teaching all children%

    What else should evaluators !no& andloo! or%

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    29/60

    >emor'7 5 storage s'stems

    Semantic M inormation rom &ords

    Episodic M conte2tualspatial

    Procedural M muscle memor' Automatic M conditioned response

    memor'

    Emotional

    +Sprenger) (,

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    30/60

    Semantic >emor'Long term 0ling ca*inets o actual

    inormation" e& inormation

    must *e connected to

    old !no&ninormation

    " Dicult to access)

    re@uires repetition"

    " eeds to *e stimulated

    *' associations) comparisons

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    31/60

    Episodic >emor'

    Conte2tual or spatial memor' Ever' piece o learning ta!es place in

    some location

    I3nvisi*leJ inormation

    blog.schoology.com

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    32/60

    Automatic

    Stimuli automaticall' triggersresponse

    " Can open other memor' lanes" Songs) pictures) places

    " A*ilit' to read) multipl') add

    " = comprehension

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    33/60

    Emotional

    Ta!es precedence over all othermemor'

    metro.co.uk

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    34/60

    Learning modalities

    Hisual

    Audio

    Kinesthetic

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    35/60

    Learning St'le Curriculum

    >aster' St'le7>aster' St'le7

    .5: Population.5: Population

    (-: At#is!(-: At#is!

    3nterpersonal St'le73nterpersonal St'le7

    .5: Population.5: Population

    44: At#is!44: At#is!

    6nderstanding St'le76nderstanding St'le7

    (5: Population(5: Population

    9: At#is!9: At#is!

    SelE2pressive St'le7SelE2pressive St'le7

    (5: Population(5: Population

    --: At#is!--: At#is!

    +Silver) Strong) and Perrini) -999,

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    36/60

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    37/60

    Second Ta!e A&a' When discussing teacher perormance)

    there a multiple rame&or!s or the

    conversations a*out learning or allstudents"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    38/60

    3nclusive Classroom Are the principles o 6DL utilied% Are the

    recognition) strategic) and afective

    net&or!s utilied% 3s there evidence that the classroom

    learning is *rain compati*le%

    3s there evidence that learning andassessment are designed) developed) andimplemented using multiple modalities)learning st'les) and intelligences%

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    39/60

    Let$s Watch a Lesson

    #$

    T diti l > t i l

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    40/60

    Strengt&s: C&allenges:

    Traditional >aterials7Te2t*oo!s

    T diti l > t i l#%

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    41/60

    Traditional >aterials7Te2t*oo!s

    Strengt&s:

    Tactile ormats

    #erepresentation ospo!en language

    Can reer *ac! toreinorce &hat$s *eenlearned

    Accurate record o pastevents

    Can *e reread)reconsidered)

    ree2amined

    C&allenges:

    Sight

    Decoding s!ills) uenc' Turning pages

    Bac!ground !no&ledge

    ollo&remem*er inormation

    lac!s inherent e2pressiveness

    o speech Bound *' conventions +e"g"ne&spapers) Gournals) novel)reerence,

    #epurposing inormation

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    42/60

    Digital Te2t " " "

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    43/60

    Reading Standards for Informational -e+t ./

    12:/rades (((-7 Ke' 3deas and Details

    (" Cite strong and thorough te2turalevidence to support anal'sis o &hat the

    te2t sa's e2plicitl' as &ell as inerencesdra&n rom the te2t"

    Lin!ing the annual goal to the CCSS

    Common Core &tate &tandards !or 'nglis(

    Language )rts * Literacy in +istory ,&ocial

    &tudies &cience and .ec(nical &ub/ects

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    44/60

    No& do &e *uild accessi*ilit'

    and transition to college andcareer or Shane " ""

    Keeping t(e end in mind 0 0 0

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    45/60

    Selecting a goal

    Reading Informational and Literary Text

    Foundational Skills Reading with Fluency

    #0 Read wit( su!!icient accuracy and !luency to supportcompre(ension0

    a0 Read on-level text wit( purpose and

    understanding0b0 Read on-level prose and poetry orally wit(

    accuracy appropriate rate and e1pression onsuccessive readings0

    c0 Use conte1t to con!irm or sel!-correct word recognition0

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    46/60

    Diferentiating 3nstruction As the planning and deliver' o classroom

    instruction that considers the varied levels

    o readiness) learning needs) and interestso each student"

    Center or 3mplementing Technolog' in Education +C3TEd,

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    47/60

    Wh' diferentiate% Because " " " S'stematic learner varia*ilit'

    State and ederal mandates

    Evidenced*ased practices

    Diversit' o students

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    48/60

    Third Ta!e A&a'

    /ood teaching is goodteaching) no matter

    the pro0le o thestudent"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    49/60

    Supports in School All students can learn i the school and

    school district support teachers in

    providing access to the Common CoreStandards in general educationclassrooms"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    50/60

    (" All Learners and E@ual Access

    U Does our school clearl' articulate and communicate a vision or and commitment to educatingall students in efective classrooms% 3 so) ho&% 3 not) &hat *arriers to ull inclusion and e@ual

    access or ELLs and students &ith disa*ilities e2ist and ho& can the' *e addressed%

    U Do our school$s classrooms have appropriate class sies and composition% No& can redesigningclass sie and composition ensure *etter proportionate representation% No& does our schoolensure that legal and educationall' sound procedures are ollo&ed &hen identi'ing and placingELLs and students &ith disa*ilities in appropriate educational placements%

    U Does our school provide ample opportunities or ELLs to interact &ith uent spea!ers o English

    in order to ac@uire academic and social language) and to support the acculturation o thesestudents into the school and societ' &hile maintaining their 0rst language and culture%

    U Does our school provide all educators &ith access to students$ individualied education program+3EPs, and Section 591 individualied accommodation plans% Does our school inorm and supporteducators in understanding and implementing these individualied programs% No& can &e ensurethat the *est plans to meet all students$ individual needs are implemented as intended%

    U Does our school provide all educators &ith access to data +e"g") grades) o*servations)curriculum*ased assessments) ormative assessments) records and test scores, related tostudents$ academic achievement and English language development% Does our school providesupport to educators in interpreting these data to promote students$ academic) social and*ehavioral success) and to ensure that ELLs learn language and content simultaneousl'%

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    51/60

    -" 3ndividual Strengths and Challenges andSupporting Diversit'U Does our school utilie strategies that help all students develop ongoing) natural riendshipsand supportive relationships &ith other students and teachers% No& do the adults in our school

    model and support respectul riendships and relationships &ith allcommunit' mem*ers%

    U Do all students in our schools have opportunities to engage in cocurricular and e2tracurricularprograms% 3 not) ho& can &e redesign our cocurricular and e2tracurricular oferings to ensurethat ever' student has access to them%

    U Does our school provide a variet' o individualied) coordinated services designed to addressthe uni@ue strengths and challenges o all students) such as prereerral services) English as aSecond Language +ESL, programs and services) responsetointervention s'stems,) 0rst andsecondlanguage support programs as appropriate) school&ide positive *ehavioral supports andanti*ull'ing programs% No& can &e improve these s'stems o support or all students%

    U Does our school help all students ma!e successul transitions +e"g") *et&een classes) romelementar' to middle school) rom school to &or!postsecondar' education, and develop sel

    determination% Does our district achieve and sustain a (99 percent graduation rate &ith allstudents advancing to ruitul and selul0lling postsecondar' opportunities% 3 not) &hat stepscan &e ta!e to help students ma!e successul transitions and develop seldetermination) andho& can &e reduce the rate at &hich students leave school *eore achieving a high schoolcredential%

    U Are our school$s services) policies and practices diversi0ed% Do the' ta!e into account thecultural) linguistic and e2periential *ac!grounds o all students and their amilies% Who is

    represented in our communit') and ho& can &e provide them a voice regarding our school$sservices) policies and practices%

    . #eective #esponsive Diferentiated and

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    52/60

    ." #eective) #esponsive) Diferentiated andEvidenceBased PracticesU Does our school provide all students &ith access to a challenging) high@ualit' and developmentall' appropriate

    curriculum aligned to the state$s standards &ithin and across content areas% 3 so) ho& can &e improve this access% 3 not) ho& can&e improve the @ualit' o the curriculum and redesign curriculum deliver' to ma!e sure it is air and provides e@ual access

    or all students %

    U Does our school give all students access to efective and varied instructional practices) and an appropriate amount o instructionaltime% 3 so) ho& can &e ensure continual improvement o these practices and instructional time allocations% 3 not) in &hat &a's do&e need to change our instructional practices and time allocations so that all students$ strengths) challenges)

    diversities) *ac!grounds) language needs) st'les) a*ilities and preerences are addressed%

    U Does our school provide all students and teachers access to current and innovative instructional and assistive technologies% 3 not)ho& can &e 0nd and utilie our availa*le resources so that all students and teachers have access to these technologies%

    U Does our school support classroom instruction that is characteried *' diferentiation) e2i*le groupings) student and groupdirected learning) high@ualit' language development) cultural sensitivit' and responsiveness) and authentic and relevant

    learning e2periences% 3 so) ho& can &e continuall' improve these practices% 3 not) in &hat &a's can &e provide the necessar'proessional development and support to change our classroom instruction to encourage and sustain these practices%

    U Does our school utilie a variet' o valid and relia*le measures to assess student learning progress and inorm instruction% Does ourschool ofer students the appropriate assessment accommodations and alternatives the' need to demonstrate their learning%

    What additional measures) assessment accommodations and alternatives can &e use to evaluate student learning and inorminstruction%

    U Does our school implement a comprehensive and multiaceted evaluation o all aspects o its programs) and ma!e improvements*ased on the data collected% No& do &e use data to enhance our educational programs so the' *ene0t all students% What additionaldata can &e utilie%

    U Does our school utilie a variet' o strategies and supports to help all students develop academic) social and civicengagements!ills% No& can &e ma!e sure that meaningul engagement is encouraged) modeled and cele*rated at the school) in the lassroom

    and &ith individual students%

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    53/60

    1" Culture) Communit' and Colla*oration

    U Do our educators) students) amilies) caregivers and communit' mem*erscolla*orate to communicate) share resources and e2pertise) ma!e decisions)

    and solve pro*lems% Does our school provide educators &ith ade@uate time tocolla*orate &ith each other and to communicate &ith amilies) caregivers andcommunit' mem*ers% What can &e do to improve our s'stem o colla*orationand proessional development to ensure *etter sharing o resources) decisionma!ing and pro*lemsolving%

    U Does our school provide the resources) adult supports) time) schedulingarrangements and high@ualit' proessional development to educate allstudents in inclusive classrooms% What can &e do to encourage ocused andruitul colla*oration and high@ualit' proessional development%

    U Does our school communicate a sense o communit' &here individual

    diferences are valued% No& can &e create an even stronger sense ocommunit'%

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    54/60

    ourth Ta!e A&a'

    /ood teaching needs

    modeling) support andnurturance"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    55/60

    #eerencesAugust) D") Salend) S") Staehr enner) D" V Koi!) P" +-9(-,"

    The Evaluation of Educators in Eective Schools andClassrooms for All Learners. E.TL The EducatorEvaluation or E2cellence in Teaching and LearningConsortiumCommon Core State Standards 3nitiative&&&"corestandards"org

    Darche) S") a'ar) ") V Bracco) K"#" +-99," Work-basedlearning in California !""ortunities and #odels forE$"ansion. WestEd V the Xames 3rvine oundation

    D'namic Learning >aps Alternative Assessment S'stemconsortium &&&"d'namiclearningmaps"org

    ational Center and State Colla*orative Partnership +CSC,http7&&&"cehd"umn"edunceoproGectsCSCCSC"html

    Partnership or Assessment o #eadiness or College andCareers &&&"parcconline"org

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    56/60

    Bro&der) D") Spooner) ") AhgrimDelell) L") lo&ers) C")Algaine) B" V Karvonen) >" +-991," A content anal'sis o

    the curricular philosophies reected in states$ alternateassessment perormance indicators" %esearch & 'ractice for'ersons with Severe (isabilities) *++1,) (45(D7Paul N" Broo!es"

    Neaco2) D" +-99," #aking (ierentiation a ,abit">inneapolis) >7 ree Spirit Pu*lishing

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    57/60

    #eerencesXac!son) #" +-995," Curriculum Access for Students with Low-ncidence

    (isabilities The 'romise of niversal (esign for Learning.Wa!e0eld)>A7 ational Center on Accessing the /eneral Curriculum romhttp7aim"cast"orglearnhistor'archive*ac!groundpaperspromiseQoQudl

    Xorgensen) C" >" +(5," Essential @uestions) inclusive ans&ers"Educational Leadershi") /*+1,) 5-55"

    Kleinert) N" L") V Kearns) X" " +-99(,"Alternative Assessment #easuring

    !utcomes and Su""orts for Students with (isabilities. Baltimore7 Paul N"Broo!es Pu*lishing Co"

    >ar'land State Department o Education +-9((,"A %oute for Ever0Learner (L as a 1ramework for Su""orting Learning and m"rovingAchievement for All Learners in #ar0land.Pre!indergarten ThroughNigher Education rom

    http7dlsli*rar'"state"md"uspu*licationsE2ec>SDESB148Ch.95NB5Ch.94Q-9(9"pd

    ational Center on Accessing the /eneral Curriculum +CAC, +-99(,"(ierentiated nstruction and m"lications for (L m"lementation romhttp7aim"cast"orglearnhistor'archive*ac!groundpapersdiferentiatedQinstructionQudl

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    58/60

    #eerencesational Center on 6niversal Design or Learning rom

    http7&&&"udlcenter"org

    Partnership or Assessment o #eadiness or College andCareers &&&"parcconline"org

    Purcell) S" V /rant) D" +-99-,"Assistive Technolog0 Solutionsfor E' Teams) Herona) Wisconsin7 3EP #esources.

    #ose) D" V >e'er) A" +-99-," Teaching Ever0 Student in the(igital Age niversal (esign for Learning.Ale2andria) HA7Association or Supervision and Curriculum Development"

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    59/60

    #eerencesSilver) N") Strong) #") V Perini) >"X" +-999," So That Each #a0 Learn ntegrating

    Learning St0les and #ulti"le ntelligences" Ale2andria) HA7 Association or

    Supervision and Curriculum Development" The Access Center7 3mproving =utcomesor Students K3D 3nstitute) Center or E2celling in Developmental Disa*ilities) ational'rofessional (evelo"ment Center on Autism S"ectrum (isorders Summer nstituteTraining) Xune (1(

  • 7/23/2019 Nti July 2012 Differentiation for Special Education in Ccss Presentation

    60/60

    #eection

    ?uestions%

    Comments%