No Slide Titlesp.construction.transportation.org/Documents/US90Reconstruction28...Introduction –...
Transcript of No Slide Titlesp.construction.transportation.org/Documents/US90Reconstruction28...Introduction –...
August 1, 2007
St. Louis BaySt. Louis BayHarrison and Hancock CountiesHarrison and Hancock Counties
Damage and DestructionDamage and DestructionDesign Build ProcessDesign Build Process
Reconstruction of US 90 BridgesReconstruction of US 90 Bridges
Biloxi BayBiloxi BayJackson and Harrison CountiesJackson and Harrison Counties
Introduction Introduction –– St. Louis Bay BridgeSt. Louis Bay Bridge
David David SeyfarthSeyfarth, P.E., P.E.•• District 6, Area District 6, Area
Construction EngineerConstruction Engineer•• Saucier, Mississippi Saucier, Mississippi
(District 6 Field Office)(District 6 Field Office)
Rodney Gray, P.E.Rodney Gray, P.E.•• URS Resident EngineerURS Resident Engineer•• Bay St. Louis Mississippi Bay St. Louis Mississippi
(Field 6 Office)(Field 6 Office)
Allan NelsonAllan Nelson•• GraniteGranite--Archer Western Archer Western
Project DirectorProject Director
Introduction Introduction –– Biloxi Bay BridgeBiloxi Bay Bridge
Kelly Castleberry, P.E.Kelly Castleberry, P.E.•• District 6, Area Construction District 6, Area Construction
EngineerEngineer•• Ocean Springs, Mississippi Ocean Springs, Mississippi
(District 6 Field Office)(District 6 Field Office)
Kent Kent DussomDussom, P.E., P.E.•• URS Transportation URS Transportation
ManagerManager•• Field OfficeField Office
Steve UnderwoodSteve Underwood•• GC Constructors GC Constructors
Project DirectorProject Director
AgendaAgenda
Challenges of Hurricane KatrinaChallenges of Hurricane Katrina
DesignDesign--Build ProcessBuild Process
Bridge over the St. Louis BayBridge over the St. Louis Bay
Bridge over the Biloxi BayBridge over the Biloxi Bay
Hurricane KatrinaHurricane Katrina
The Costliest ($81.2B)The Costliest ($81.2B)
One of the Deadliest (1,836)One of the Deadliest (1,836)•• 238 in Mississippi238 in Mississippi
Destruction 100 Miles from Destruction 100 Miles from CenterCenter
Clearing the RoadClearing the Road
Monday, August 29, 2005Monday, August 29, 2005
Early Morning Early Morning –– Hurricane Katrina strikes the Hurricane Katrina strikes the Mississippi CoastMississippi Coast
4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. -- MDOT began clearing roadwaysMDOT began clearing roadways
11:00 p.m. 11:00 p.m. -- One lane open on US 49 SouthOne lane open on US 49 South
Tuesday, August 30, 2005Tuesday, August 30, 2005
6:00 p.m. 6:00 p.m. -- One lane open on I 59 South One lane open on I 59 South from Meridian to Hattiesburgfrom Meridian to Hattiesburg
Initial Debris Removal (Phase I)Initial Debris Removal (Phase I)
Most routes were not passable immediately Most routes were not passable immediately after the storm.after the storm.
MDOT had every highway passable by MDOT had every highway passable by Wednesday (8/31) evening.Wednesday (8/31) evening.
All lanes were open by Friday (9/2) evening.All lanes were open by Friday (9/2) evening.
Personnel reallocation was required.Personnel reallocation was required.
Debris Removal (Phases 2 & 3)Debris Removal (Phases 2 & 3)
Phase II Phase II -- MDOT forces & 8 highway contractors MDOT forces & 8 highway contractors pushed all debris off of the shoulderspushed all debris off of the shoulders
Phase III Phase III -- MDOT contracted with 30+ MDOT contracted with 30+ contractors to haul debris off of state highways to contractors to haul debris off of state highways to approved landfills. MDOT personnel were approved landfills. MDOT personnel were monitors in the field. monitors in the field.
Debris Quantity & Cost to DateDebris Quantity & Cost to Date
First PassFirst Pass
Over 6 million ydOver 6 million yd33 debris debris removedremoved
Total cost: $149.4 millionTotal cost: $149.4 million•• FHWA FHWA
Completed Jan 31, 2006Completed Jan 31, 2006
Second PassSecond Pass
Cost: $19.7 million thru Cost: $19.7 million thru 10/17/0610/17/06
•• FEMAFEMA
Other Issues Immediately After LandfallOther Issues Immediately After Landfall
Supply ChainSupply Chain
FuelFuel
CommunicationsCommunications
StaffingStaffing
Personnel HousingPersonnel Housing
Damage Assessment TeamsDamage Assessment Teams
Documented Estimated Quantities for Repair & CostDocumented Estimated Quantities for Repair & Cost
Submitted by County & RouteSubmitted by County & Route
Items Covered such as Pavement Damage, Debris (1Items Covered such as Pavement Damage, Debris (1stst
pass), Signals, Signs, Guardrails, etc.pass), Signals, Signs, Guardrails, etc.
Required for FHWA Emergency Relief fundingRequired for FHWA Emergency Relief funding
Barge struck the bridge during storm surge. Barge struck the bridge during storm surge.
Replaced 300Replaced 300’’ of bridge of bridge –– out of alignment out of alignment
Contractor Contractor –– T L WallaceT L Wallace
Cost Cost -- $5,200,000 Incentive $100,000/day$5,200,000 Incentive $100,000/day
Began work Began work –– September 10 September 10
Completed Completed –– October 1 October 1 –– 10 days early!10 days early!
Emergency Bridge Repair IEmergency Bridge Repair I--1010at Pascagoula Riverat Pascagoula River
Damage to an outside pile Damage to an outside pile
Drove two additional piles & extended cap.Drove two additional piles & extended cap.
Contractor Contractor –– T L WallaceT L Wallace
Cost Cost -- $2,500,000$2,500,000
Work Began Work Began –– September 20September 20
Work Completed Work Completed –– October 8October 8
Emergency Bridge Repair IEmergency Bridge Repair I--110 110 at Back Bay of Biloxiat Back Bay of Biloxi
Emergency Bridge Repair IEmergency Bridge Repair I--110 110 at Back Bay of Biloxiat Back Bay of Biloxi
Emergency Bridge Repair IEmergency Bridge Repair I--110 110 at Back Bay of Biloxiat Back Bay of Biloxi
US 90 Bridge @ Henderson PointUS 90 Bridge @ Henderson Point
Replace six spans total.Replace six spans total.
Contactor Contactor –– Hill BrothersHill Brothers
Cost Cost -- $1,900,000$1,900,000
Work Began Work Began –– November 7, 2005November 7, 2005
Completion Date Completion Date -- February 17, 2006February 17, 2006
US 90 Harrison CountyUS 90 Harrison County
►► ““Spot reconstructSpot reconstruct”” over 116 lane miles of over 116 lane miles of pavement pavement
►► 3 paving contractors at a total cost of 3 paving contractors at a total cost of approximately $25 Millionapproximately $25 Million
►►Work Began September 10, 2005Work Began September 10, 2005
►►Completion Date Completion Date –– December 17, 2005December 17, 2005
Traffic SignalsTraffic Signals
Damage to all 40 Intersections on US 90 in Harrison Damage to all 40 Intersections on US 90 in Harrison County County
All signals up and running by September 19.All signals up and running by September 19.
MDOT forces, B & B Electric, C & L Const.MDOT forces, B & B Electric, C & L Const.
MDOT also repaired 33 intersections for citiesMDOT also repaired 33 intersections for cities
Ferry Service @ Bay St. LouisFerry Service @ Bay St. Louis
Total Cost $5 millionTotal Cost $5 million
$987,000 for Dredging$987,000 for Dredging
$1.37 Million for Materials & Pile Driving$1.37 Million for Materials & Pile Driving
Remainder for OperationsRemainder for Operations
45 minute schedule 45 minute schedule
7 days a week from 6:30 am to 6:30 pm7 days a week from 6:30 am to 6:30 pm
Operational on November 1Operational on November 1stst, 2006 , 2006
Destruction of the US 90 BridgesDestruction of the US 90 Bridges
Combination of EventsCombination of Events
Storm Surge raised water levelStorm Surge raised water level•• Ocean Engineering Associates Report Ocean Engineering Associates Report
–– 2828’’ at Bay St. Louisat Bay St. Louis–– 2424’’ at Biloxi Bayat Biloxi Bay
Bridge Panels became buoyantBridge Panels became buoyant
Wave Action knocked down panelsWave Action knocked down panels
Consider User CostsConsider User Costs
Economic Impact of Additional Travel TimeEconomic Impact of Additional Travel Time
Up to 45 minutes rerouteUp to 45 minutes reroute
Vehicle Travel Cost Vehicle Travel Cost -- $100,000 / day$100,000 / day
How to Fix It?How to Fix It?
Bridges Could Not Be RepairedBridges Could Not Be Repaired•• Extensive Damage to BridgesExtensive Damage to Bridges•• Not to Current StandardsNot to Current Standards•• Existing Problems with Movable SpansExisting Problems with Movable Spans
Bridges Needed to Be ReplacedBridges Needed to Be Replaced•• Realignment Required to Miss Debris FieldRealignment Required to Miss Debris Field
Look at Alternative ProcurementLook at Alternative Procurement
Conventional DesignConventional Design--BidBid--BuildBuild
DesignDesign•• 9 months to one year9 months to one year
BiddingBidding•• 3 months3 months
ConstructionConstruction•• 2 to 3 years2 to 3 years
Total 3 to 4 yearsTotal 3 to 4 years
DesignDesign--BuildBuild
Bid Process UpfrontBid Process Upfront•• 6 months from start to selection6 months from start to selection•• Concurrent designConcurrent design
DesignDesign--BuildBuild•• Less than 2 yearsLess than 2 years
Total Time to OperationTotal Time to Operation•• 2.5 years2.5 years•• Savings of over 6 months to 1.5 years!Savings of over 6 months to 1.5 years!
DesignDesign--BidBid--Build versus DesignBuild versus Design--BuildBuild
Task Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
DesignBiddingConstruction
2 yearsBid ProcessDesign-Build
Year 5Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
AgendaAgenda
Challenges of Hurricane KatrinaChallenges of Hurricane Katrina
DesignDesign--Build ProcessBuild Process
Bridge over the St. Louis BayBridge over the St. Louis Bay
Bridge over the Biloxi BayBridge over the Biloxi Bay
How does DesignHow does Design--Build Save Time?Build Save Time?
Design is concurrent with bid process and Design is concurrent with bid process and construction processconstruction process
Designer works for contractor, not ownerDesigner works for contractor, not owner•• Different RelationshipDifferent Relationship•• Higher Risk to DesignerHigher Risk to Designer
Judicious Sharing of Risk between Owner Judicious Sharing of Risk between Owner --ContractorContractor
What does DesignWhat does Design--Build Require?Build Require?
Owner must define what is needed:Owner must define what is needed:•• ““The problemThe problem””
Owner must define the rules: Owner must define the rules: •• Design parameters/requirements to allow for Design parameters/requirements to allow for
flexibility in design (promote creativity)flexibility in design (promote creativity)
What does DesignWhat does Design--Build Require?Build Require?
Owner Must Define the Project:Owner Must Define the Project:•• Existing Information (Maps, Existing Information (Maps, topotopo, geotechnical), geotechnical)•• RightRight--ofof--Way / Utility AgreementsWay / Utility Agreements•• Environmental PermitsEnvironmental Permits•• Design CriteriaDesign Criteria•• Vessel Collision ReportVessel Collision Report•• Special ProvisionsSpecial Provisions•• Form of the Contract (DesignForm of the Contract (Design--Build Contract)Build Contract)
TwoTwo--Step Selection ProcessStep Selection Process
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Request for Qualifications (RFQ)
Step One Step One –– Equate all Bidders that are qualified Equate all Bidders that are qualified to Bid on projectto Bid on project
•• RFQ required:RFQ required:–– Purpose / Overview / ScopePurpose / Overview / Scope–– Management ApproachManagement Approach–– Experience of Key PersonnelExperience of Key Personnel–– Past PerformancePast Performance–– QA / QC PlanQA / QC Plan–– Financial ConditionFinancial Condition
TwoTwo--Step Selection ProcessStep Selection Process
Request for Proposal (RFP) Request for Proposal (RFP)
Step Two Step Two -- Technical Evaluation of Design and Technical Evaluation of Design and Bid PriceBid Price•• RFP RequirementsRFP Requirements
–– Purpose / Overview / General InformationPurpose / Overview / General Information–– Stipend ($100,000)Stipend ($100,000)–– Instructions to BiddersInstructions to Bidders–– Project ScopeProject Scope–– Proposal DevelopmentProposal Development
•• Volume 1Volume 1•• Volume 2Volume 2
Request for ProposalsRequest for Proposals
Volume 1 Volume 1 –– Technical ProposalTechnical Proposal•• SummarySummary•• Scope Scope –– Design PlansDesign Plans•• Management ApproachManagement Approach•• Construction PlanConstruction Plan•• Key PersonnelKey Personnel•• Technical SolutionsTechnical Solutions•• Quality PlanQuality Plan•• ScheduleSchedule•• Certifications, etc.Certifications, etc.
RFP Technical EvaluationRFP Technical Evaluation
Compliance with the RFP Requirements Compliance with the RFP Requirements
Management Approach Management Approach
Technical Solutions Technical Solutions
Qualitative Considerations Qualitative Considerations
ScheduleSchedule
Volume 2 Volume 2 –– Lump Sum PriceLump Sum Price•• Lump Sum PriceLump Sum Price•• Schedule of ValuesSchedule of Values•• Assumptions (Escrow Documents)Assumptions (Escrow Documents)•• CertificationsCertifications
Request for ProposalsRequest for Proposals
Incentive / DisincentiveIncentive / Disincentive
NoNo--Excuse Bonus for Achieving Milestone 1Excuse Bonus for Achieving Milestone 1•• $5,000,000$5,000,000
Road User PenaltyRoad User Penalty•• Days beyond Milestone 1 Days beyond Milestone 1 -- $100,000 / Day $100,000 / Day •• Days beyond Milestone 2 Days beyond Milestone 2 -- $50,000 / Day$50,000 / Day
RFP Price EvaluationRFP Price Evaluation
A = Bid PriceA = Bid Price
B = Days to Milestone 1B = Days to Milestone 1
C = Days from Milestone 1 to Milestone 2C = Days from Milestone 1 to Milestone 2
D = Technical Score (1 D = Technical Score (1 –– 100)100)
Best Value Proposal = Best Value Proposal = A + B*100,000 + C*50,000A + B*100,000 + C*50,000
[ 1 + (D/100) ][ 1 + (D/100) ]
Development of RFQ / RFPDevelopment of RFQ / RFP
Timeline Timeline -- St. Louis BaySt. Louis Bay•• Advertise RFQAdvertise RFQ Sept 28Sept 28•• Submit RFQSubmit RFQ Oct 17Oct 17•• Notify RespondersNotify Responders Oct 24 Oct 24 •• Issue RFPIssue RFP Nov 3Nov 3•• PrePre--Proposal MeetingProposal Meeting Nov 10Nov 10•• RFP Addendum 1RFP Addendum 1 Nov 30Nov 30•• RFP Addendum 2RFP Addendum 2 Dec 22Dec 22•• Submit Volume 1Submit Volume 1 Jan 13Jan 13•• Submit Volume 2Submit Volume 2 Jan 23Jan 23•• AwardAward Jan 24Jan 24•• Notice to ProceedNotice to Proceed Feb 20Feb 20
Development of RFQ / RFPDevelopment of RFQ / RFP
August September October November December January February
Hurricane KatrinaImpact AssessmentIssue RFP Nov 3Pre-Proposal Meeting Nov 10RFP Addendum 1 Nov 30RFP Addendum 2 Dec 22Submit Volume 1 Jan 13Submit Volume 2 Jan 23Award - Jan 24 6 MonthsNotice to Proceed Feb 17
Timeline Timeline -- St. Louis Bay St. Louis Bay
Bid ResultsBid Results
St. Louis Bay BridgeSt. Louis Bay Bridge•• Best Value Best Value -- $266,782,833$266,782,833•• Milestone 1 Milestone 1 –– 451 Days, Milestone 2 451 Days, Milestone 2 –– 649 Days649 Days•• Granite/ArcherGranite/Archer--Western (GAW) Western (GAW) --ContractorContractor•• HNTB HNTB -- Designer and CEIDesigner and CEI
Biloxi Bay BridgeBiloxi Bay Bridge•• Best Value Best Value -- $338,631,734$338,631,734•• Milestone 1 Milestone 1 –– 516 Days, Milestone 2 516 Days, Milestone 2 –– 671 Days671 Days•• Massman/Traylor/Kiewit (GCC) Massman/Traylor/Kiewit (GCC) –– ContractorContractor•• Parsons Transportation Group Parsons Transportation Group –– DesignerDesigner•• VolkertVolkert -- CEICEI
Bid ResultsBid Results
Annual Construction Budgets
$570.00
$580.00
$590.00
$600.00
$610.00
$620.00
$630.00
$640.00
2002 2003 2004 2005
Fiscal Year
Mill
ions
US 90 Bridges US 90 Bridges Total $605 MTotal $605 M
Dedication of MDOT/FHWA Dedication of MDOT/FHWA
The speed at which the bid documents were The speed at which the bid documents were prepared was amazing.prepared was amazing.
Complete Teamwork by MDOT Complete Teamwork by MDOT –– HQ, DistrictHQ, District
FHWA expertise FHWA expertise –– participationparticipation
URS support role URS support role –– additional manpower and additional manpower and expertise in designexpertise in design--buildbuild
AgendaAgenda
Challenges of Hurricane KatrinaChallenges of Hurricane Katrina
DesignDesign--Build ProcessBuild Process
Bridge over the St. Louis BayBridge over the St. Louis Bay
Bridge over the Biloxi BayBridge over the Biloxi Bay
72
St. Louis Bay BridgeSt. Louis Bay Bridge
Client: MISSISSIPPI DOTNTP: February, 20, 2006
451 days to Milestone1 – May 16, 2007685 days to Milestone2 – January 5, 2008
Value: $266,782,883 (Original)$283,492,058 (With Change Orders)
73
MAJOR ITEMS OF WORKMAJOR ITEMS OF WORK
•463 ea 36” square precast, prestressed piles (avg 145’)•435 ea 30” square precast, prestressed piles (avg 125’)•43 ea Trestle-bent caps 95’ long on 36” piles•46 waterline footings on 30” piles, (6,600 cy)•48 Cast-in-place concrete columns from 30 - 72 ft tall (7,600 cy)•48 Cast-in-place hammerhead-style caps (4,500 cy)•3,573,000 lbs black rebar•9,647,000 lbs epoxy-coated rebar•531 Bulb-T, 78” girders on typical 150’ spans. 154 Type IV AASHTO Girders. •Middle 250’-long mid span bracketed by 200 ft back spans; post-tensioned, spliced girders consisting of 18 haunches, and 27 drop-in/end segments. •1,074,000 sf bridge deck, (34,000 cy).
76
PILEDRIVINGPILEDRIVING898 Pile on Water
435 – 30” - max 157 ft (57 TNS)463 – 36” – max 164 ft (77 TNS)
96
PROGRESS TRACKING
Decking/Diaphragms-Milestone 2(ES/LS Curves Based Upon Schedule Update UD18 5/13/07)
0.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
800.00
1000.00
1200.00
1400.00
1600.00
6-May-0
713
-May
-07
20-M
ay-0
727
-May
-07
3-Ju
n-0710
-Jun-0
717
-Jun-0
724
-Jun-0
71-
Jul-0
78-
Jul-0
715
-Jul-0
722
-Jul-0
729
-Jul-0
75-
Aug-07
12-A
ug-0
719
-Aug
-07
26-A
ug-0
72-
Sep-07
9-Sep-0
716
-Sep
-07
23-S
ep-0
7
Wee
kly
Dec
king
(CY)
0.00
2000.00
4000.00
6000.00
8000.00
10000.00
12000.00
14000.00
16000.00
18000.00
Cum
ulat
ive
Deck
ing
(CY
)
Actual_wkEarly_cmActual_cmLate_cm
AgendaAgenda
Challenges of Hurricane KatrinaChallenges of Hurricane Katrina
DesignDesign--Build ProcessBuild Process
Bridge over the St. Louis BayBridge over the St. Louis Bay
Bridge over the Biloxi BayBridge over the Biloxi Bay
Change Order StatusChange Order Status
Cost ($1,000's)
Percent of Total
Original Proposal $338,6321 Utility Agreements (3) $1,544 0.5%2 Environmental (0) $0 0.0%3 Value Engineering (0) $0 0.0%4 Dispute Review Board (0) $0 0.0%5 Project Additions $1,808 0.5%
Accent Lighting $1,495Roadway Lights $189Aesthetic Plaques $124
6 RFP Issues $324 0.1%HS20 Loading $233Finger Joint Welds $91
Total $342,308 101.1%
Description
St. Louis Bay St. Louis Bay Biloxi BayBiloxi BayCost
($1,000's)Percent of
TotalOriginal Proposal $266,783
1 Utility Agreements (4) $193 0.1%2 Environmental (1 UST) $43 0.0%3 Value Engineering (2) ($73) 0.0%4 Dispute Review Board (1) $539 0.2%5 Project Additions $14,457 5.4%
Accent Lighting $7,121Barrier Rails $1,893Pedestrian Rail $210Aesthetic Plaques $233No Excuse Bonus $5,000
6 RFP Issues $1,550 0.6%Vessel Collision $437Debris Disposal (FA) $1,113
Total $283,492 106.3%
Description