NMR in Biophysical Chemistry Preview: Ligand Binding and ...
Transcript of NMR in Biophysical Chemistry Preview: Ligand Binding and ...
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
1
NMR in BiophysicalChemistry
Erik Zuiderweg and David Case
Preview:
Ligand Binding andAllosterics
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
2
Simple Ligand Binding:Two-site exchange
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
3
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
4
fA=fB=0.5 kex=10-1 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
5
fA=fB=0.5 kex=100 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
6
fA=fB=0.5 kex=101 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
7
fA=fB=0.5 kex=102 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
8
fA=fB=0.5 kex=103 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
9
fA=fB=0.5 kex=104 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
10
fA=fB=0.5 kex=105 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
11
fA=fB=0.5 kex=106 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
12
Fast exchange titration
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
13
kex=106 s-1 fA=1.00 fB=0.00
! = fFREE!BOUND + fBOUND!BOUND
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
14
kex=106 s-1 fA=0.67 fB=0.33
! = fFREE!BOUND + fBOUND!BOUND
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
15
kex=106 s-1 fA=0.50 fB=0.50
! = fFREE!BOUND + fBOUND!BOUND
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
16
kex=106 s-1 fA=0.33 fB=0.67
! = fFREE!BOUND + fBOUND!BOUND
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
17
kex=106 s-1 fA=0.00 fB=1.00
! = fFREE!BOUND + fBOUND!BOUND
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
18
SIMPLE USE:Chemical Shift Mapping
Complex:15N-2H Flavodoxin 14N-1H Methionine
SynthaseAmide H
Amide
15N
15N
14N
15N
14N
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
19
Quantitating Fast Exchange Binding Constants
[LP] =[L]
TOT+ [P]
TOT+ K
D( ) ± [L]TOT
+ [P]TOT
+ KD( )
2
! 4[L]TOT[P]
TOT
2
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
20
Slow exchange Titration
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
21
kex=0.1 s-1 fA=1.00 fB=0.00
IA = fFREE IFREE IB = fBOUNDIBOUND
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
22
kex=0.1 s-1 fA=0.67 fB=0.33
IA = fFREE IFREE IB = fBOUNDIBOUND
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
23
kex=0.1 s-1 fA=0.50 fB=0.50
IA = fFREE IFREE IB = fBOUNDIBOUND
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
24
kex=0.1 s-1 fA=0.33 fB=0.67
IA = fFREE IFREE IB = fBOUNDIBOUND
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
25
kex=0.1 s-1 fA=0.00 fB=1.00
IA = fFREE IFREE IB = fBOUNDIBOUND
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
26
Quantitating Slow Exchange Binding Constants
Saturation =IBOUND
IBOUND
+ IFREE
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
27
Range of Quantitation
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
28
Range of Quantitation
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
29
Range of Quantitation
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
30
Intermediate exchangetitration
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
31
kex=103 fA=1.0 fB=0.0
LW = fALWA + fBLWB + fA fB!A "!A( )
2
kex
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
32
kex=103 fA=0.9 fB=0.1
LW = fALWA + fBLWB + fA fB!A "!A( )
2
kex
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
33
kex=103 fA=0.8 fB=0.2
LW = fALWA + fBLWB + fA fB!A "!A( )
2
kex
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
34
kex=103 fA=0.5 fB=0.5
LW = fALWA + fBLWB + fA fB!A "!A( )
2
kex
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
35
kex=103 fA=0.2 fB=0.8
LW = fALWA + fBLWB + fA fB!A "!A( )
2
kex
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
36
kex=103 fA=0.1 fB=0.9
LW = fALWA + fBLWB + fA fB!A "!A( )
2
kex
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
37
kex=103 fA=0.0 fB=1.0
LW = fALWA + fBLWB + fA fB!A "!A( )
2
kex
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
38
Quantitating Kinetics
Slow Exchange : Upper limit on kex (typical: kex << 10 s-1)
Fast Exchange : Lower limit on kex (typical: kex >> 104 s-1)
Intermediate Exchange : quantify kex
(typical: 102 s-1 < kex < 104 s-1)
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
39
Simulating two-site exchange
dMx
A(t)
dt= !"AMy
A(t) ! R
2
A+ kAB( )Mx
A(t) + kBAMx
B(t)
dMy
A(t)
dt= +"AMx
A(t) ! R
2
A+ kAB( )My
A(t) + kBAMy
B(t)
dMx
B(t)
dt= !"BMy
B(t) ! R
2
B+ kBA( )Mx
B(t) + kABMx
A(t)
dMy
B(t)
dt= +"BMx
B(t) ! R
2
B+ kBA( )My
B(t) + kABMy
A(t)
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
40
Simulating two-site exchange
i!A " R2A " kAB kBA
kAB i!B " R2B " kBA
#
$%&
'(M
+
A
M+
B
#
$%&
'(=
pAMtot
pBMtot
#$%
&'(
Steady-state solution
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
41
Simulating two-site exchange
S !( ) = Im Mtot
pA ! "!!B( ) + pB ! "
!!A( ) + i kAB + kBA( )
! "!!A( ) + ikAB( ) ! "
!!B( ) + ikBA( ) + kABkBA
#$%
&%
'(%
)%
Steady-state solution
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
42
More Possibilities in 2D
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
43
Ligand Binding:Three-site exchange
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
44
Curved traces insequential 3-site exchange
2L + P ! " L + LP ! "L2P
P PL PL2
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
45
Sometimes, a two-site exchange
must be three-site exchange
KD=10-9 M
Δω=200 r/s
IHPFree
IHPBound
31P NMR
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
46
kon_max =108 M-1 s-1
KD =10-9 M
koff_max =0.1 s-1
!" =100 rs-1
IHP
Hemoglobin
IHP
Hemoglobin
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
47
Sometimes, a two-site exchange
must be three-site exchange
KD=10-9 M
Δω=200 r/s
IHPFree
IHPBound
31P NMR
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
48
k =108 M-1 s-1
KD =10-9
M
k =104 s-1
KDa =10-4 M
k =104 s-1
k =10 9 s-1
KDb =10-5
Solution: one ligand,
two consecutive fast processes
“entry site”
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
49
Simulating three-siteexchange
d
dt
M+
A(t)
M+
B(t)
M+
C(t)
!
"
###
$
%
&&&=
i'A( R
2
A ( kAB( k
ACkBA
kCA
kAB
i'B( R
2
B ( kBA( k
BCkCB
kAC
kBC
i'C( R
2
C ( kCA
( kCB
!
"
###
$
%
&&&
M+
A(t)
M+
B(t)
M+
C(t)
!
"
###
$
%
&&&
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
50
Solution
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
51
Ligand Binding:four-site exchange
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
52
Ligand-binding-induced conformationalchange = 4-site exchange
k =105 M-1 s-1
k =108 M-1 s-1
k =103 s-1
k =103 s-1
k =10-2 s-1 k =10-1 s-1
k =10-1 s-1 k =10-3 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
53
k =105 M-1 s-1
k =108 M-1 s-1
k =103 s-1
k =103 s-1
k =10-2 s-1 k =10-1 s-1
k =10-1 s-1 k =10-3 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
54
k =105 M-1 s-1
k =108 M-1 s-1
k =103 s-1
k =103 s-1
k =10-2 s-1 k =10-1 s-1
k =10-1 s-1 k =10-3 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
55
k =105 M-1 s-1
k =108 M-1 s-1
k =103 s-1
k =103 s-1
k =10-2 s-1 k =10-1 s-1
k =10-1 s-1 k =10-3 s-1
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
56
Allosterics
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
57
Allosterics is wide-spread
•Site “b” knows whether site “a” is occupied
•“Intra-molecular signal transduction”
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
58
e.g. signal transduction
NMR allows delineation of theallosteric mechanism of a
cytidylyltransferase
Stevens, S.Y., Sanker, S., Kent, C. and Zuiderweg, E.R.P.,
Nature Structural Biology 8, 947-952 (2001)
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
60
Crystal structure of CTP:glycerol-3-phosphate cytidylyltransferase
(GCTase)+ 2CTP
Courtesy ofMartha LudwigChris Weber
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
61
An Allosteric Enzyme
CTP
CTP CTP
CTP CTP
CTP CTP
G3P
G3P G3P
G3P
G3P
G3P G3P
G3P
CTP
G3P
G3P
CTP
1 µM
(1 µM)
300 µM (300 µM)
(1500 µM)
(100 µM) (100 µM)
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
62
CTP
CTP CTP
CTP CTP
CTP CTP
G3P
G3P G3P
G3P
G3P
G3P G3P
G3P
CTP
G3P
G3P
CTP
1 µM
(1 µM)
300 µM (300 µM)
(1500 µM)
(100 µM) (100 µM)
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
63
CTP CHEMICAL SHIFT MAPPING
First CTPKD < 5 µM
Second CTPKD = 500 µM
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
64
CTP
CTP CTP
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
65
+S
+S
or
or
or
DEFINING THE KNF-ALLOSTERIC MODEL
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
66
Where is the negative cooperativitycoming from?
First CTPΔG = -7.3 Kcal/M
Second CTPΔG = -4.6 Kcal/M
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
67
First CTPΔG = -7.3 Kcal/M
Second CTPΔG = -4.6 Kcal/M
Binding sites identical,Expect identical localbinding free energies
Thus:2.7 Kcal/M of bindingfree energy lost on
interface
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
68
15N R2 relaxation with and without exchange broadening suppression
GCT GCT(CTP)2GCT(CTP)
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
69
Therefore, the allosteric free energyof negative cooperativity
has an entropic component.
GCT
Dynamic
GCT(CTP)2GCT(CTP)
Dynamic Rigid
ΔS = 0 ΔS = neg
Other example:Allosteric energy is (partially)
dynamic in origin
Mäler, L., Blankenship, J., Rance, M. & Chazin, W. J. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 245 – 250 (2000).
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
72
1 2L
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
73
The allosteric free energy ofpositive cooperativity
has an entropic component.
Calb
Dynamic
Calb(Ca2+)2Calb(Ca2+)
Rigid Rigid
ΔS = 0ΔS = neg
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
74
Cooper A, Dryden DT: Allostery without conformational change. A plausible model.
Eur Biophys J 1984, 11:103-109.
ENC-tutorial 2006:Erik RP Zuiderweg, U Michigan
75
Thank you for your attentionI hope this was useful…