Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

25
UNDER THE GUIDANCE: DR LISAM

Transcript of Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Page 1: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

UNDER THE GUIDANCE:

DR LISAM

Page 2: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

High throughput sequencing

Lower Cost

Less time

Parallel Sequencing process

Sequence thousands of sequences at once

Page 3: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing (Lynx Therapeutics)

Polony Sequencing (Agencourt Biosciences)

454 Pyrosequencing (454 Life Sciences)

Illumina (Solexa) sequencing

SOLiD Sequencing (Applied Bio-systems)

Ion Semiconductor sequencing (Ion Torrent Systems Inc.)

DNA Nanoball (Complete Genomics)

Heli-oscope Single Molecule Sequencing

Single Molecule SMRT Sequencing (Pacific Biosciences)

Page 4: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

The ability to process millions of sequence reads in parallel rather than 96 at a time.

NGS fragment libraries do not need vector based cloning and E. coli based amplification stages used in capillary sequencing.

Shorter Read Lengths.

Capillary sequencing – 96 wells, NGS – 10 million wells

High throughput :

Sanger: 96 reads < 800-1000b/run

Solexa: 1.2X106 reads < 75b/run

Page 5: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

High Throughput

Adapter ligation

Requirement of relatively little input DNA

Production of shorter read lengths(more convenient in downstream processing).

Page 6: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Roche 454 GS FLX sequencer

(Pyrosequencing)

Illumina genome analyzer

(Sequencing by Synthesis)

Applied Biosystems SOLiD sequencer

(Sequencing by ligation)

Page 7: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02
Page 8: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02
Page 9: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02
Page 10: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02
Page 11: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02
Page 12: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02
Page 13: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02
Page 14: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Mutation discovery

Transcriptome Analysis – RNA-Seq

Sequencing clinical isolates in strain-to-reference mechanisms.

Enabling Metagenomics

Defining DNA-Protein interactions – ChIP-Seq

Discovering non-coding RNAs

Page 15: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Discovery of mutations that determine phenotypes.

Conventional Approach – PCR amplified –Capillary sequencing – alignment/detection.

Whole genome resequencing is faster and less expensive using NGS.

E.g. Discovery of SNP in C. elegans required only a single run of Illumina Sequencer. (Hiller et.al.)

Page 16: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Massively Parallel Sequencing method for Transcriptome analysis.

mRNA (transcript) – cDNA – sequencing using Next Generation Short Read Sequencing technology.

Reads are aligned to a reference genome and a Transcriptome map is constructed.

Advantages :

Does not require existing genomic sequence unlike hybridization.

Low background noise

High resolution – up to 1 bp (identification of SNP)

High throughput, low cost

Page 17: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Even though complete genome sequence are available for disease causing microbes, continuous evolution by mutation and sequence exchange.

The depth of sampling of NGS helps greatly in identification of rare VARIANTS in the clinical strain isolates.

This is not possible in sequencing PCR products which is commonly done in a clinical diagnostic setting, because the low signal strength from variant nucleotides would not be detectable on a capillary sequencer.

The cloning bias is eliminated.

Improve diagnostics, monitoring and treatments.

Page 18: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Metagenomics – sequencing of DNA of uncultured/unpurified microbial population followed by bioinformatics based analysis by comparison.

Associated cost of capillary sequencing remains very high.

Elimination of Metagenomic signatures from certain microbial sequences that are not carried stably by E.coli. during cloning.

Characterizations of the microbial census of the human and mouse intestinal flora and the oral cavity Microbiome.

Page 19: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

DNA-Protein interactions – DNA packaging into histones

Regulatory protein Binding

Exploring Chromatin Packaging

Page 20: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

ChIP requires an antibody specific for the DNA binding protein.

Protein DNA cross linker is added.

Cell lysis --- DNA fragmentation – Antibody Immunoprecipitation.

Crosslinking reversal or southern blotting or qPCR

ChIP-Seq --- simply make an adaptor ligated library of the released immunoprecipitated fragments and sequence them en masse.

High coverage and higher resolution.

NRSF and STAT1 transcription factors.

Page 21: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Genomic DNA packaging into histones – availability of genes for transcription.

ChIP-Seq to compare histone methylations at promoter regions to check gene expression levels.

In a study, 20 histones, one histone variant (H2A.Z), RNA Polymerase II and insulator binding protein.

Result: Changes in Chromatin state at specific promoters reflect changes in gene expression they control.

Page 22: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

ncRNAs– regulatory RNA molecules.

Prediction of precursor and sequences of ncRNA by in silico methods is of limited use.

Examines the potential for secondary structure formation, putative genomic identification and regulatory molecules.

Identification of 21-U -RNAs in C.elegans.

Page 23: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Third generation (Next-Next Generation) Sequencing.

Variations in sequences of human genome (about 5% considering the allele variation) is found using NGS.

A pilot project for determination of additional Human Genome sequences.

Page 24: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02

Elaine R. Mardis (2008) the impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics. Cell vol.24 No.3,133-14

Jorge S Reis-Filho (2010): Next-Generation Sequencing, Breast Cancer Research 2010, 11(Suppl 3)

Elaine R. Mardis (2009): Next-Generation Sequencing Methods. Annu. Rev. Genomics hum genet. 9:387-402

Some websites

Page 25: Nextgenerationsequencing 120202015950-phpapp02