Newsletter issue 20
-
Upload
mtmconsultinguk -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Newsletter issue 20
mtm SCHOOL MATTERS
mtmCONSULTING
strategy for education
ISSUE 20
SEPTEMBER 2015
01 mtmconsulting Ltd (a brand of Education Market Research Solutions Ltd)
01502 722787 or 507408 www.mtmconsulting.co.uk
Page 2:
What mumsnet can do for you
Did you know all our newsletters, latest blogs and
details of mtminsights events are available online?
www.mtmconsulting.co.uk
When predictions go wrong
DOMINIC KNIGHT, Senior Researcher at mtmconsulting, considers the implications of the pollsters getting it wrong in their General Election predictions.
Much more than just data
I n our last newsletter, in the light of the
imminent General Election, we explored
what another hung parliament might
mean for education over the next five
years, which was based on an apparently
consistent picture being presented by the
polls.
Contrary to expectations, the first majority Con-
servative government for nearly 20 years was re-
turned on 7th May, with all the implications this will
have for educational policy over the next Parlia-
ment, a subject for a future article.
Here we ask why did all the pollsters suffer their
biggest debacle since 1992? Should we trust their
work in future? What, if any, implications are there
for similar types of research in other areas?
1992 is the obvious starting point as this was the
last time that there was such a large discrepancy
between pollsters’ predictions and the actual out-
come. In the post-mortem that followed, pollsters
came up with the concept of ‘Shy Tories’ – people
who were unwilling to be fully truthful with pollsters
about voting Conservative. There may also have
been a very late swing to the Tories on the day of
the General Election not caught by the polls.
It is often not realised that the headline polling
figures that are presented in the media are usually
not the actual ‘raw’ survey figures but are the end
result of sampling, weighting and multipliers used to
finesse these to create a more balanced and ac-
curate picture of the true state of electoral prefer-
ences from a comparatively small sample. The
methodology was amended in the light of the 1992
experience, and this seemed to do the trick for the
next 20 or so years.
But here we are again in 2015. The British Polling
Council immediately announced an inquiry into
what had happened after the results were known.
This is still ongoing, but it is already clear that 1992
may not be a useful guide. The consensus is that
there weren’t as many ‘Shy Tories’ this time. Like-
wise, there does not appear to have been a late
swing in the polls.
Other explanations currently mooted include:
►‘Lazy Labour’ – the number who actually voted
Labour was notably lower than the number telling
pollsters they were considering doing so. Many of
these appeared to come from the younger age
and poorer socio-demographic groups, whose vot-
er participation rates are among the lowest.
►Online versus telephone. There was a notable
dichotomy between online and telephone surveys:
the former tended to favour Labour and the latter
tended to favour the Tories. This again appears to
be because the groups more likely to use social
media and the Internet are also more likely to be
left wing. Users of online polls by their nature tend
to be self-selecting with the final base more restrict-
Page 3:
The latest mtm ‘Insights’ event – The Dos and Don’ts of Mumsnet
Page 4
Recent demographic changes
and your school
► Continued on page 3
02 mtmconsulting Ltd (a brand of Education Market Research Solutions Ltd)
01502 722787 or 507408 www.mtmconsulting.co.uk
ISSUE 20 mtm SCHOOL MATTERS
I n 2010 the general election was dubbed
the ‘Mumsnet election’ when all the major
political parties clamoured to outdo each
other on the site.
However, if mumsnet’s power to sway parents’ politi-
cal choices and ultimately elections have diminished
since then, its power to inform and influence their
school admission choices has not.
Mumsnet is not only increasingly rivalling schools’ own
websites as a source of key information but also more
importantly as the first port of call for many parents
(especially that premium group of parents moving into
a new area). It is indeed rare these days to type a
school’s name without finding a mumsnet link with a
thread dissecting all aspects of the school. This can go
a long way in influencing the decisions of parents. This
is a direct result of the forum’s reputation for offering
parents diverse but independent advice, informed by
experience either from current or former parents
which serves to paint a clearer picture than any
school website or glossy prospectus.
Recent parent surveys conducted by mtmconsulting
(both new joiners and decliners) have demonstrated
an increasing reliance on social media discussions and
many parents cite the use of social media (mostly
mumsnet) while few cite the school’s own publica-
tions.
Given the significant, and growing position of
mumsnet and social media platforms in informing the
choices of parents, school admissions and marketing
managers must respond to this sooner rather than lat-
er. Based on insight from recent mtmconsulting strate-
gic reviews, online audits and marketing recommen-
dations for schools, the following three measures can
help schools alleviate any possible negative aspects
and enhance their ability to capitalise on the positives
that a platform like mumsnet offers.
1. Digital audits/strategic reviews
In the digital age it is wise to have a digital strategy in
place informed by a comprehensive digital audit and
analysis that is linked to your school’s marketing plan.
This allows you to be aware of how connected you
actually are to potential customers and, most im-
portantly, have the capability/capacity to respond
should you need to. Is there anyone in your school
What mumsnet can do for you
who is responsible for regularly monitoring your
school’s digital reputation?
2. Rapid response
Having the platform capability or capacity to re-
spond is not quite enough in the social media age.
Responses are most effective when delivered
promptly. However it is important to note that it is
never advisable to get into an online argument –
the best strategy is to respond promptly, succinctly,
factually whenever it is needed. Does your school
have anyone who is clearly responsible for this with
the appropriate training in place?
3. Stakeholder involvement
Social media platforms and discussion forums like
mumsnet are trumping school websites because of
one simple truth: they are talking to other mums
who offer them detailed, relevant and authorita-
tive information just as they need it. As such, allow-
ing your school’s own parents (and pupils) a voice
on your platforms (such as blogging) could en-
hance the online reputation of your school. Clearly
this needs an element of control, such as using sup-
portive parents from your Friends or Parents’ Com-
mittee.
It’s clear that mumsnet is becoming more powerful
than your school’s own marketing collateral and is
often the most important source of information for
prospective parents who do not have a direct
word-of-mouth recommendation. As such, it should
be included as an integral part of your strategic
marketing plan.
For advice on how to harness the power of
mumsnet, email [email protected] or call
01502 722787. Alternatively, our next mtminsights
event covers this area (details opposite).
mtmconsulting Researcher and IT Specialist MODOU JALLOW shows how important it is to consider mumsnet and other social media as part of your marketing strategy.
03 mtmconsulting Ltd (a brand of Education Market Research Solutions Ltd)
01502 722787 or 507408 www.mtmconsulting.co.uk
mtm SCHOOL MATTERS
ed to these groups, skewing the result.
►Pollster ‘herding’. At the bottom line, polling
companies are businesses – they want to make
sure their data is credible to clients – and this might
unconsciously cause a homogenisation of results
where data contrary to expectations and what
competitors are producing is weeded out as
‘rogue’. In this election, pollsters have been ac-
cused of this type of ‘herding’, resulting in suspi-
ciously similar polling results irrespective of sample
size, methodology and source.
None of these, of course, may actually be rele-
vant; we will have to see what the final conclusions
of the review are.
What does this mean for survey based research in
general? Polling surveys are a highly specialised
part of the industry, and the issues outlined above
are largely specific to them.
Non-polling surveys tend to involve more narrowly
defined groups for specific clients than polling sur-
veys. Schools, for example, will know who their par-
ents are or recorded those who have expressed an
interest in the school. There is usually no need to
‘fish’ for the right type of respondent in the way
polling surveys do, nor will there usually be an extra
layer of weighting or multipliers used. The raw data
will be the basis of subsequent reporting – what you
see will be what you get. It will be a snapshot rather
than a prediction.
Respondents are also unlikely to be too con-
cerned about how they answer questions and are
more likely to be truthful as a result. These are also
subject to rigorous data protection legislation as
well, addressing any concerns about being singled
out by a client for being too critical. You can be
sure that any findings or opinions given are likely to
be an accurate reflection of what those surveyed
actually think.
Finally, these surveys are also much more con-
crete than theoretical and specific to the client.
This means in-depth, useful information that can be
acted upon.
Although the pollsters did not cover themselves in
glory back in May, this does not diminish the value
of online and telephone surveys as an investigative
tool. We at mtm pride ourselves at bringing many
years’ experience and best practice to survey work
helping our clients get the best possible high-quality
information for their marketing efforts.
If you want to find out more about what we can
do for you, contact James Leggett at mtmconsult-
ing ([email protected]).
► Continued from page 1
mtmINSIGHTS
mtmconsulting seminars for
school leaders The mtminsights events enable delegates to access the
latest research and ideas, and to apply them in their
schools.
13th October 2015
The Dos and Don’ts of
Mumsnet
One Euston Square (adjacent to Euston Station), 40 Melton
Street, London NW1 2FD
9.30 am to 2 pm, including lunch. Bring your laptop/tablet!
We are very pleased to play host to Rebecca Mears, Head of
Community at mumsnet, with Holly Christie, Director of Chip-
munk Design and Marketing Manager at Park Hill
School, detailing the importance of social media in your
school, which platforms you should be using, and how to man-
age the them.
Rebecca will be talking through the dos and don’ts of
mumsnet, answering questions such as:
♦ How can we encourage our parents to write good things
about us?
♦ Can we start a conversation on our school just to get feed-
back?
♦ Should we respond to negative comments about us, and if
so how?
♦ How can we make mumsnet work for us?
♦ What are parents looking for regarding schools on
mumsnet?
We are asked these questions time and time again, so we
decided to ask them at source. This is an invaluable opportuni-
ty for marketers at independent schools to ask the questions
they have been dying to ask for so long to mumsnet directly.
In addition to this, Holly Christie, our specialist social media
expert, will discuss:
♦ The appropriate social media for your school
♦ Management strategies for all the platforms
♦ Maximising your exposure through social media
♦ Making sure your social media reflects your marketing strat-
egy
This will be followed by a workshop where you can use your
device to apply what you have learnt, asking our experts as
you go, to ensure you leave the morning better informed than
when you arrived.
There will then be a delicious lunch.
Fee £250 inc vat. These events are limited to 30 delegates and
likely to be oversubscribed, so early booking is advised.
To book a place, call us on 01502 722787 or go to our website
www.mtmconsulting.co.uk
04 mtmconsulting Ltd (a brand of Education Market Research Solutions Ltd)
01502 722787 or 507408 www.mtmconsulting.co.uk
ISSUE 20 mtm SCHOOL MATTERS
Recent demographic changes and your school
ty. There is already evidence of dissatisfied parents
making increased used of the independent sector.
Secondly, the market is project to grow to 2037, al-
beit it with a brief contraction from 2023–32. As such,
business plans should be focussed on expansion, or
risk losing market share. The positive economy, interest
rate rise notwithstanding, coupled with decreased
satisfaction with state schools should counter the ef-
fects of falling affordability in the short term at least,
although all schools need to be mindful of big fee in-
creases.
Thirdly, Free Schools need to be monitored. The big-
gest growth in Free Schools so far has been in areas
where middle-class, educationally aware
‘aspirational’ parents predominate. This market
makes up around 5% of independent school rolls at
present – around 30,000 pupils – which is a small but
not insignificant proportion.
Not all schools will be able to grow. Some already
may be at the full capacity of their sites, whilst others
may not wish to expand. As an alternative, these
schools could perhaps consider raising the standards
of their entrance criteria. Longer term, this should po-
tentially lead to improved academic outcomes and
therefore improved reputation.
The education market as a whole is changing, and
independent schools need accurate and actionable
data to ensure they are prepared for the future in or-
der to remain profitable. Positive population projec-
tions should not be grounds for complacency, but do
offer hope of a good future.
mtmconsulting offers research, marketing and stra-
tegic support services to independent schools. Visit us
at www.mtmconsulting.co.uk or call 01502 722787.
mtmconsulting is now a brand of Education Market
Research Solutions Ltd.
A n uncertain economic climate accom-
panied with falling affordability have
been mainstays of independent school rhet-
oric in over the last five years, but one thing
that has been constant is the birth rate.
We have analysed the year-on-year change in the
projected numbers of 0–4 year olds to 2037. Whilst the
birth rate has been increasing year on year, it ap-
pears this peaked in 2014. Whilst the numbers of 0–4s
in total are continuing to increase, the rate of growth
is reducing. Current projections issued by the Office of
National Statistics suggest the numbers of 0–4 year
olds within England will continue to grow until 2021,
although with a slight dip from 2016–17. The figures
suggest there will be a return to growth in 2032–33.
Over the period from 2012 to 2037, we expect there to
be an increase in the number of 0–4 year olds of
around 1.7%.
What about the regions?
Regionally the picture is somewhat different. East
Anglia has experienced a declining birth rate since
2012–13 and is projected to experience the greatest
decline of all the regions, with contraction of 0.61%
from 2025–26, whilst the South West, somewhat surpris-
ingly, shows minimal decline of only 0.06% from 2027–
28, but otherwise will continue to see growth. London
is not expected to have an easy time and will fare
slightly worse than the South East.
What does this mean for independent schools?
First and foremost, the state-maintained sector is al-
ready creaking under the pressure, with no significant
plans for investment in existing primary schools – it is
hoped the Free School system will pick up this capaci-
JAMES LEGGETT, mtmconsulting Research Director, dissects the latest population projections for children up to the age of four in England and considers implications for school rolls.
If you want to work with us or find out more about
what we could do for you, email :