New York State System Benefits Charge (SBC) – NGA Center for Best Practices April 29, 2004 Bob...
-
Upload
margaret-ramsey -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of New York State System Benefits Charge (SBC) – NGA Center for Best Practices April 29, 2004 Bob...
New York State System Benefits Charge (SBC) –
NGA Center for Best PracticesApril 29, 2004Bob Callender
Vice President for Programs NYSERDA
NYSERDA Overview
• Established in 1975 by State Legislature• Mission: To identify solutions to State’s
energy challenges in ways that benefit the State’s economy and environment
• Forge public/private partnerships with businesses, municipalities, residents, and other energy stakeholders to accomplish this goal
NYSERDA Responsibilities• Research & Development• Energy Planning and Analysis• Coordination of State’s Energy Issues• Manage West Valley Nuclear Clean-up• Public Awareness of Energy Efficiency• Development of Saratoga Technology +
Energy Park – STEP• System Benefits Charge Administrator
% of Ratepayer Contributions by Service Area
NMPC25.52%
NYSEG13.56%
O&R3.57%
RG&E2.48%
CHG&E4.36%
Con Edison50.51%
% of Program Funds Encumbered by Service Area
O&R2.78%
RG&E3.86%
CHG&E4.08%
Con Edison46.00%
NMPC30.94%
NYSEG12.34%
Collections and Distributions Total 8 year budget = $932.1 million
SBC Order’s Public Policy Goals
• Improve system-wide reliability and increase peak electricity reductions through end user efficiency actions
• Improve energy efficiency and access to energy options for under served customers
• Reduce the environmental impacts of energy production and use
• Facilitate competition in the electricity markets to benefit end-users
Objectives to Achieve Policy Goals• Reduce peak electricity demand
• Improve energy efficiency and reduce electricity use by all sectors
• Save money for consumers, businesses, and institutions
• Reduce the environmental impacts of energy use• Foster long-term market changes to sustain and
grow benefits• Develop next generation efficient end-use
technologies
Major Program Accomplishments• Reduced annual statewide electric energy
requirements by 1,000 Gwh• Peak Demand Reductions of 870 MW
permanent/ callable• Enhanced electric system reliability with 100
Gwh of renewable resources • Produced $140 million a year in energy bill
reductions• Reduced air pollution by: 1,000 tons of Nox,
1,750 tons of SO2, and 800,000 tons of CO2• Leveraged $3 of private project investment for
every $1 of SBC funds
Four Major Program Areas
• Business and Institutional Energy Efficiency
• Residential Energy Affordability• Low-Income Energy Affordability• Research and Development
Business and Institutional Energy Efficiency
Business and Institutional Energy Efficiency Program Area Budget (in millions)Total Program Area Budget = $355.4 million
New Construction Peak Load Reduction
Technical Assistance
C/I Performance
Municipal Water/Wastewater Loan Fund
Energy Management
Energy Efficient Products
$138.438.9%
$37.010.4%
$10.52.9%
$79.422.3% $42.7
12.0%
$2.80.8%
$12.33.4%
$32.29.1%
Source: NYSERDA
Town of Amherst (CIPP)• Project Cost -$7
million • 11 million kWh/yr
savings• $1.1 million
NYSERDA incentive• Cost Savings-
$875,000 annually• ESCO- Siemens
Building Technologies
NYS DOT – New Construction Program
• NYS Department of Transportation Equipment Management Shop
• An incentive of $195,961• Geothermal Heat Pump System, High
Efficiency Windows, Direct Digital Control Energy Management System, a 30 KW Photovoltaic System, and High Efficiency Fluorescent Fixtures and Occupancy Sensors
• Project will benefit from 123,627 kWh/per year in reduced energy consumption, and $18,205 per year in energy cost savings
Erie County – Technical Assistance Program
• $20,000 in NYSERDA matching funds for county-wide energy efficiency planning
• Facilitated $4 million in facility upgrades
• Created $1 million in energy bill savings for the County
• An additional $500,000 was paid in installation incentives from NYSERDA
Residential Energy AffordabilityResidential Energy Efficiency Program Area Budget (in millions)
Total Program Area Budget = $165.2 million
Other
General Outreach and Education
Keep Cool
Small Homes
Multifamily Buildings and Homes
Energy Star Products
Program Marketing
$22.613.7%
$27.616.7%
$20.212.2%
$44.226.8%
$29.417.8%
$6.23.8%
$15.09.1%
Source: NYSERDA
Home Performance with Energy Star
• Home Performance with Energy Star® has created an industry infrastructure through certifying contractors to conduct home energy assessments
• The awareness of Energy Star® and the Home Energy Rating System is unprecedented
Low-Income Energy AffordabilityLow-Income Program Area Budget (in millions)
Total Program Area Budget = $119.6 million
Awareness
Coordination (LIFE)
Aggregation (Buying Strategies)
Direct Installation
Assisted Home Performance
AMP
$26.622.2%
$9.98.2%
$3.73.1%
$2.82.3%
$0.510.4%
$76.263.7%
Source: NYSERDA
Low-Income Energy Affordability
• Low-Income Assisted Multi-family Buildings Program (AMP) has created a new way to address Multi-family housing
• The program provides technical assistance, financial packaging, consumption awareness, and sub-metering opportunities to dramatically decrease energy consumption
Research and DevelopmentResearch and Development Program Area Budget (in millions)
Total Program Area Budget = $210.8 million
Renewable Wholesale
Renewable End-Use
Next Generation R&D
Other
DG/CHP
EMEP
Source: NYSERDA
$57.227.1%
$67.131.8%
$12.76.0%
$22.710.8%
$29.614.0%
$21.510.2%
Research and Development
• Contracted $7 million for production incentives towards the operation of 41.5 MW of wind power
• An additional $15 million in incentives will be provided for another 4 wind projects - over 450 MW of wind power is expected to be developed under the Program
• Three PV Practitioner Training Institutes offering a 210 hour program in installation and repair
• Trained installers can sit for National certification program that is now available
Program Evaluation Efforts• Efforts continue to be in accordance with
NYSERDA/DPS/PSC Memorandum of Understanding
• An independent effort working with all stakeholders
• SBC Advisory Group continues to act as the Independent Program Evaluator of record
• Advisory Group was active in contractor selection and developing the scope of work
Solicitation & Contracting Process
• Competitive Solicitations
• Outreach Efforts
• Evaluation Process
• Streamlined Contracting Process