Negotiation Ethics

13
(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011) Ethics in Negotiatio n LDR 655 Wallace Siena Heights University

description

Siena Heights University graduate class on Negotiation as Process based on text (2011) from Lewicki, Saunders and Barry (McGraw-Hill).

Transcript of Negotiation Ethics

Page 1: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Ethics in Negotiation

LDR 655

Wallace

Siena Heights University

Page 2: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Do Ethics Matter?• Why are ethics important?

• How do you define “ethics”?– Morality is the advantage of the stronger?

– Moral virtue?

– Nature or nurture?

– Duty?

– Material morality?

– Ultimate good?

Page 3: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Four Philosophies

Results

Duty

Social PersonalEthics

Page 4: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Resolving Moral Problems

Page 5: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Ethical Conduct

• Ethically ambiguous?– What is the meaning of

truth?– What ethically

ambiguous tactics are there?

– Is it all right to use ethically ambiguous tactics?

Page 6: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

• Deception

– Omission

– Commission

Ethical Conduct

Page 7: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Deception Model

Page 8: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Motives and Consequences

• Power

• Competition

• Cultural– Individualistic/Collective

• Opponent perception

Page 9: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Consequences

Positive and Negative

–Effectiveness

–Perception

• Others

• Self

Page 10: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Justifications

• What can or have you rationalized away?– What are the consequences

of excusing our behavior?• Does looking for and

expressing the necessity of using deception work?– What are the consequences

from your personal or work experience of this behavior?

Page 11: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Rationalizations• Unavoidable

• Harmless

• Avoids negative consequences

• Altruistic

• “They had it coming,” or “They deserve it,” or “I’m just getting my due”

Page 12: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

Deceptive Opponents?• Ask probing questions• Phrase questions in different ways• Force the other party to lie or back

off• Test the other party• “Call” the tactic• Ignore the tactic• Discuss what you see and offer to

help the other party change to more honest behaviors

• Respond in kind

Page 13: Negotiation Ethics

(Lewicki, Saunders & Barry. 2011)

What Choices Will You Make?Ethics, too, are nothing but

reverence for life. This is what gives me the fundamental

principle of morality,

namely, that good consists in maintaining, promoting,

and enhancing life,

and that destroying, injuring,

and limiting life are evil. Albert Schweitzer