NC I G NBRIDGE NALYSIS

2
DESKTOP ROUTING ANALYSIS LOW-CARBON ENERGY PROJECT ENBRIDGE GAS INC. Evaluation Criteria Preliminary Preferred Route Alternative Route Disconnect Locations 3 BIOPHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS Waterbodies (naturally occurring lakes or ponds) in Project footprint 1 0 0 0 Watercourses (rivers and streams) overlapping with Project footprint 0 0 0 Wetlands/wetland complexes in Project footprint 0 0 0 Special Policy Areas (i.e., Greenbelt) in Project footprint 0 0 0 Areas of Natural or Scientific Interest in Project footprint 0 0 0 Vegetation in Project footprint (Low, Moderate or High) 2 Low Low Low SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSTRAINTS Residences in Project footprint 1 1 5 Commercial/Industrial properties in Project footprint 1 Enbridge Facility and 1 other business 1 Enbridge Facility and 1 other business None Institutional Buildings (i.e., schools, churches, healthcare) in Project footprint 0 0 0 Recreational Uses in Project footprint (does not include bike routes) None None None Cultural Features in Project footprint None None None Archaeological Potential (Low, High) in Project footprint Low Low Low Prime Agricultural Lands in Project footprint None None None Specialty Crop Areas in Project footprint None None None TECHNICAL CONSTRAINTS Route Length (km) 1,057 m 544 m 2 Disconnect Locations Major Highway Crossings (e.g., 400 series) 0 0 N/A Major Road Crossings 0 1. Woodbine Avenue (runs along) 4 N/A Minor Road Crossings (number) 1. Honda Boulevard (crosses twice) 2. Mobis Drive 0 N/A Filed: 2019-12-20, EB-2019-0294, Exhibit C, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Attachment 5, Page 1 of 2

Transcript of NC I G NBRIDGE NALYSIS

Page 1: NC I G NBRIDGE NALYSIS

DES

KTO

P R

OU

TIN

G A

NA

LYSI

S

LOW

-CA

RB

ON

EN

ERG

Y P

RO

JEC

T –

EN

BR

IDG

E G

AS

INC.

Eval

uat

ion

Cri

teri

a P

relim

inar

y P

refe

rred

Ro

ute

A

lte

rnat

ive

Ro

ute

D

isco

nn

ect

Loca

tio

ns3

BIO

PH

YSI

CA

L C

ON

STR

AIN

TS

Wat

erb

od

ies

(nat

ura

lly o

ccu

rrin

g la

kes

or

po

nd

s) in

Pro

ject

fo

otp

rin

t1 0

0 0

Wat

erco

urse

s (r

iver

s an

d s

trea

ms)

o

verl

app

ing

wit

h Pr

oje

ct f

oo

tpri

nt

0 0

0

Wet

lan

ds/

wet

lan

d c

om

ple

xes

in P

roje

ct

foo

tpri

nt

0 0

0

Spec

ial P

olic

y A

reas

(i.e

., G

reen

bel

t) in

P

roje

ct f

oo

tpri

nt

0 0

0

Are

as o

f N

atur

al o

r Sc

ien

tifi

c In

tere

st in

P

roje

ct f

oo

tpri

nt

0 0

0

Veg

etat

ion

in P

roje

ct f

oo

tpri

nt

(Lo

w,

Mo

der

ate

or H

igh)

2 Lo

w

Low

Lo

w

SOC

IO-E

CO

NO

MIC

CO

NST

RA

INTS

Res

iden

ces

in P

roje

ct f

oo

tpri

nt

1 1

5

Co

mm

erci

al/I

nd

ust

rial

pro

per

ties

in P

roje

ct

foo

tpri

nt

1

Enbr

idge

Fac

ility

an

d 1

oth

er

bu

sin

ess

1

Enbr

idge

Fac

ility

an

d 1

oth

er

bu

sin

ess

No

ne

Inst

itu

tion

al B

uild

ings

(i.e

., sc

ho

ols

, ch

urc

hes

, h

ealt

hca

re)

in P

roje

ct f

oo

tpri

nt

0 0

0

Rec

reat

ion

al U

ses

in P

roje

ct f

oo

tpri

nt

(do

es

no

t in

clu

de b

ike

rou

tes)

N

on

e N

on

e N

on

e

Cu

ltu

ral F

eatu

res

in P

roje

ct f

oo

tpri

nt

No

ne

No

ne

No

ne

Arc

hae

olo

gica

l Pot

enti

al (

Low

, Hig

h)

in

Pro

ject

fo

otp

rin

t Lo

w

Low

Lo

w

Pri

me

Agr

icu

ltur

al L

and

s in

Pro

ject

fo

otp

rin

t N

on

e N

on

e N

on

e

Spec

ialt

y C

rop

Are

as in

Pro

ject

fo

otp

rin

t N

on

e N

on

e N

on

e

TEC

HN

ICA

L C

ON

STR

AIN

TS

Ro

ute

Len

gth

(km

) 1,

057

m

544

m

2 D

isco

nn

ect

Loca

tio

ns

Maj

or

Hig

hw

ay C

ross

ings

(e.

g., 4

00

seri

es)

0

0 N

/A

Maj

or

Ro

ad C

ross

ings

0

1.

Wo

od

bin

e A

ven

ue

(ru

ns

alo

ng)

4 N

/A

Min

or

Ro

ad C

ross

ings

(n

um

ber

) 1.

H

on

da

Bo

ulev

ard

(cro

sses

tw

ice)

2.

M

ob

is D

rive

0

N/A

Filed: 2019-12-20, EB-2019-0294, Exhibit C, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Attachment 5, Page 1 of 2

Page 2: NC I G NBRIDGE NALYSIS

Eval

uat

ion

Cri

teri

a P

relim

inar

y P

refe

rred

Ro

ute

A

lte

rnat

ive

Ro

ute

D

isco

nn

ect

Loca

tio

ns3

Rai

l Cro

ssin

gs (

num

ber

) 0

0 N

/A

Maj

or

Ove

rhea

d El

ectr

ic T

ran

smis

sio

n L

ines

C

ross

ed (

num

ber

) 0

0 0

Traf

fic

Vo

lum

e (L

ow

, Mo

der

ate

or

Hig

h)

Mo

der

ate

Mo

der

ate

Low

Ad

equ

acy

of

Tem

por

ary

Wo

rkin

g Sp

ace

and

La

ydo

wn

Are

as (

Po

or,

Go

od

, Exc

elle

nt)

G

oo

d

Go

od

Po

or

(th

e di

sco

nne

ct lo

cati

on

s ar

e w

ith

in u

rban

su

bdi

visi

on

s w

hich

o

ffer

ver

y lim

ited

tem

po

rary

w

ork

ing

spac

e)

No

te: S

elec

t da

ta m

ay

req

uire

fie

ld v

erif

icat

ion

; how

ever

fie

ld v

erif

icat

ion

is n

ot

anti

cip

ated

to

ch

ang

e th

e ou

tco

me

of

the

eval

uati

on

.

1Th

e P

roje

ct f

oo

tpri

nt

is d

efin

ed a

s 3

0 m

on

bo

th s

ides

of

the

Pre

limin

ary

Pre

ferr

ed R

out

e d

ata

pro

vid

ed b

y En

bri

dge

, and

as

30 m

on

bo

th s

ides

of

the

ro

ad f

rom

th

e c

ente

r o

f th

e ro

ad f

or

the

Alt

ern

ativ

e R

out

e.

2Lo

w is

def

ined

as

vege

tati

on w

ith

in t

he

Pro

ject

fo

otp

rin

t be

ing

pre

do

min

antl

y ag

ricu

ltu

ral f

ield

s (a

nn

ual

ro

w c

rop

s an

d/o

r p

ere

nni

al c

ove

r cr

ops)

. Mo

dera

te is

def

ined

as

a re

lati

vely

eve

n m

ix o

f ag

ricu

ltu

ral f

ield

s an

d n

atu

ral v

eget

atio

n (

such

as

mar

shes

, sw

amp

s, a

nd

wo

odla

nd

s). H

igh

is d

efin

ed a

s ve

geta

tio

n w

ithi

n th

e st

udy

area

bei

ng

pre

do

min

atel

y n

atu

ral (

such

as

mar

shes

, sw

amp

s an

d w

oo

dlan

ds)

. 3D

isco

nn

ect

loca

tio

ns

are

pro

vid

ed

for

info

rmat

ion

pu

rpo

ses

onl

y, a

s th

e sa

me

dis

con

ne

ct lo

cati

ons

will

be

req

uire

d f

or

both

th

e P

relim

inar

y P

refe

rred

Ro

ute

and

the

Alt

ern

ativ

e R

out

e.

4R

oad

may

or

may

no

t b

e cr

oss

ed b

y th

e p

rop

ose

d r

out

e, a

nd

can

be

re-e

valu

ated

pen

din

g th

e re

ceip

t o

f m

ore

acc

ura

te r

out

ing

dat

a.

Min

or M

od

ific

ati

on

s a

nd

Fle

xib

ility

in t

he

Pla

nni

ng P

roce

ss

Co

nsi

der

ing

the

abo

ve a

nd

th

e n

atu

re o

f th

e st

ud

y ar

ea,

it is

po

ssib

le t

hat

mo

dif

icat

ion

s to

th

e p

roje

ct m

ay b

e re

qu

ired

to

acc

ou

nt

for

inp

ut

rece

ived

as

par

t o

f th

e st

akeh

old

er a

nd

Ind

igen

ou

s co

nsu

ltat

ion

pro

gram

, or

du

e to

oth

er u

nfo

rese

en e

ven

ts s

uch

as

un

iden

tifi

ed c

on

stru

ctio

n

pro

ject

s in

th

e a

rea.

Th

is c

ou

ld in

clu

de

, fo

r ex

amp

le, c

han

ges

to t

he

rou

te s

uch

as

its

alig

nm

ent

or

loca

tio

n. C

on

sid

erin

g th

e d

ynam

ic n

atu

re o

f th

e st

ud

y ar

ea, t

he

pro

ject

tea

m a

ckn

ow

led

ges

that

fle

xib

ility

go

ing

forw

ard

is r

equ

ired

to

acc

om

mo

dat

e p

ote

nti

al f

utu

re c

han

ges

that

can

no

t b

e p

red

icte

d a

t th

is t

ime.

Filed: 2019-12-20, EB-2019-0294, Exhibit C, Tab 1, Schedule 1, Attachment 5, Page 2 of 2