Nature of science

18
DONE BY: JINAN KARAMEH Every Known fact in natural science was divined by the presentiment of somebody,before it was actually verified….(Ralph Waldo Emerson)

description

 

Transcript of Nature of science

Page 1: Nature of science

DONE BY: J INAN KARAMEH

Nature Of Science

Every Known fact in natural science was divined by the presentiment of somebody,before it was

actually verified….(Ralph Waldo Emerson)

Page 2: Nature of science

Human Knowledge

Knowledge is everything acquired by the senses of the human being and reflected by his own prior thoughts. (Condillac, 2001)

Page 3: Nature of science

Epistomology

The word is derived from the Greek words epistéme and logos – the former term meaning “knowledge” and that latter term meaning “study of”. Hence, the word parsed into English implies the nature, source, and limitations of knowledge.

Page 4: Nature of science

Scientific Or Not Scientific

There are several ways of knowing things in general, but not all ways would be considered “scientific.”

Page 5: Nature of science

What is Science?

Science is a way of knowing that requires a strong philosophical underpinning (whether consciously sought of unconsciously learned).

Page 6: Nature of science

Then the nature of science is….

NOS refers to the epistemology and sociology of science, science as a way of

knowing, or the values and beliefs inherent to scientific knowledge and its development

(Lederman, 1992).

Page 7: Nature of science

How do we know?

Developing ideas throughout human ages were based on observing, thinking, experimenting and validating. These are the fundamental aspects of science which differentiate science from other modes of knowing.

Page 8: Nature of science

What is NOS?

Page 9: Nature of science

Why Nature of Science?

• enhances learning of science content

• enhances understanding of science

• enhances interest in science

• enhances decision making

• enhances instructional delivery

Page 10: Nature of science
Page 11: Nature of science

Elements Of NOS

• The scientific world view

• Scientific Inquiry

• The Scientific Enterprise

Page 12: Nature of science

How to apply NOS?

If a teacher is to teach in a way that is consistent with scientific ways of knowing, then he or she must help students to construct knowledge and understanding from their experiences.

Page 13: Nature of science

Achieving NOS Literacy

Page 14: Nature of science

Factors Affecting NOS in education

• Role of textbook

• Role of Teacher

Page 15: Nature of science

Measuring tools for NOS

• Wisconsin Inventory Science Process (WISP)

• Nature of science test (NOST)

• VNOS (A&B)

Page 16: Nature of science

Our Context

• the lack of philosophy of science content in teacher education programs

• the failure of such programs to provide real science research experiences

• shallow treatment of the nature of science in the textbooks

Page 17: Nature of science

References:

• Abd Alkhalick F. 2012. Teaching With and About Nature Of Science, And Science Teacher Knowledge Domains. Springer Science and Business Media. BV. 2012.

• Science for all Americans http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/chap1.htm

• Flick L.B. and Lederman N. G, (eds). 2004. Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science, p. 289-425

• MacComas W. F. AlMazroa H. 1998. The Nature Of Science In Science Education; An Introduction. Science and Education. Vol 7; p. 511-532

Page 18: Nature of science

References:

• Lederman N.G, Abd Elkhalick F., Bell R. L., 2002. Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal Of Research in Science Teaching. Vol.39, No. 6. pp 497-521

• Bell, R. (2001). Implicit instruction in technology integration and the nature of science: There's no such thing as a free lunch. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial] , 1 (4) . Available:http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss4/currentissues/science/article2.htm

• De Condillac E.B, 2001, The Unnatural Nature Of Science, Cambridge University Press, Philosophy p. 225