National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

24
What it is What it means How to use it National Student Survey 2012-2013

description

This is a basic guide to the NSS for AUSA's Class Reps.

Transcript of National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Page 1: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

What it isWhat it meansHow to use it

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Page 2: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

SAMPLE ONLY

SAMPLE ONLY

Either your subject reached a statistically significant response rate, or it did not. We’ll let you know in this box for each subject.

Personal

DevelopmentLearning

Resources

Organisation

& ManagementAcademic

Support

AUSAAssessment &

FeedbackTeaching QualityOverall Satisfaction

4.1 4.3 3.9

Subject name (based on the UK-wide Joint Academic Coding System) JACS ensures consistency in comparisons across different Unis.

Rule of Thumb for Scores:Scores are out of 5.1-3 = generally poor3-4 = average, could improve4-4.5 = good, maintain or improve4.5-5 = excellent, maintain

KEY TO UNDERS TANDING SCORES:

Category Being Assessed

(current score) (2011 score) (UK-wide score)

Important Note: if your subject had fewer than 10 respondents, no data is available.

Page 3: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Accounting

University of Aberdeen (overall)(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Personal

Development

4.1 4.2 4.1Learning

Resources

4.5 4.1 4.2

Academic

Support

3.7 3.6 4.1

Organisation

& Management

4.2 3.9 4.2This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

AUSA

3.8 n/a 3.9Assessment &

Feedback

3.2 3.3 3.8

Teaching Quality

3.7 4.0 4.1Overall Satisfaction

4.1 4.0 4.2

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

4.2 4.2 4.1Learning

Resources

4.3 4.2 4.1

Academic

Support

4.1 4.0 4.0

Organisation

& Management

4 .0 4.0 4.0

AUSA

3.6 n/a 3.8Assessment &

Feedback

3.6 3.7 3.8

Teaching Quality

4.2 4.2 4.1Overall Satisfaction

4.2 4.2 4.1

Page 4: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

4.1 4.0 4.0

Academic

Support

4.3 4.2 4.0

Learning

Resources

4.0 3.4 4.1

Organisation

& Management

4.0 4.2 4.1This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

AUSA

3.3 n/a 3.7Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 3.9 3.7

Teaching Quality

4.2 4.4 4.3Overall Satisfaction

4.4 4.3 4.3

Anthropology

Personal

Development

4.5 4.1 4.3Learning

Resources

4.5 4.3 4.3

Academic

Support

4.5 4.3 4.2

Organisation

& Management

4.3 4.1 4.0

AUSA

4.0 n/a 3.9Assessment &

Feedback

3.8 3.9 3.7

Teaching Quality

4.4 4.2 4.3Overall Satisfaction

4.6 4.4 4.3

Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Page 5: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 3.6 3.7

AUSA

3.6 n/a 3.9

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

4.5 4.2 4.2Learning

Resources

4.3 4.5 4.4

Academic

Support

4.1 4.1 4.1

Organisation

& Management

3.8 3.9 4.1

Teaching Quality

4.1 4.2 4.1Overall Satisfaction

4.2 3.9 4.2

Chemical, Process and Energy Engineering

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

4.2 4.2 4.2Learning

Resources

4.3 4.2 4.1

Academic

Support

4.1 4.3 4.0

Organisation

& Management

4.1 4.2 4.1

AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.9Assessment &

Feedback

3.4 3.7 3.6

Teaching Quality

4.1 4.3 4.2Overall Satisfaction

4.3 4.3 4.1

Biology(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Page 6: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Personal

Development

4.2 4.2 4.0Learning

Resources

4.4 4.2 4.1

Academic

Support

4.1 4.4 4.0

Organisation

& Management

4.1 4.1 3.6Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

AUSA

3.9 n/a 3.6Assessment &

Feedback

3.9 4.1 3.8

Teaching Quality

4.5 4.6 4.0Overall Satisfaction

4.3 4.5 3.9

Cinematics and Photography

Personal

Development

4.5 4.1 4.1Learning

Resources

4.3 4.2 4.3

Academic

Support

4.0 4.1 4.2

Organisation

& Management

4.2 3.8 4.1Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

AUSA

3.5 n/a 3.8Assessment &

Feedback

3.5 3.3 3.8

Teaching Quality

4.1 4.1 4.2Overall Satisfaction

4.3 4.2 4.3

Chemistry(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Page 7: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Personal

Development

3.8 3.9 4.0Learning

Resources

4.4 3.9 4.2

Organisation

& Management

3.9 3.7 4.0

Academic

Support

4.0 4.2 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 3.5 3.8Overall Satisfaction

3.9 3.9 4.0

Computer Science

Teaching Quality

3.8 3.8 4.0AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.8

Personal

Development

4.1 4.0 4.2Learning

Resources

4.3 4.1 4.2

Academic

Support

3.9 3.6 4.0

Organisation

& Management

3.5 3.5 4.0Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.8Assessment &

Feedback

3.2 2.9 3.6

Teaching Quality

4.0 3.6 4.1Overall Satisfaction

3.8 3.5 4.1

Civil Engineering(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Page 8: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Personal

Development

4.3 n/a 4.6Learning

Resources

4.2 n/a 4.5

Organisation

& Management

2.7 n/a 4.0Academic

Support

3.9 n/a 4.4

Assessment &

Feedback

3.0 n/a 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.0 n/a 4.5

Dentistry(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.2 n/a 4.4AUSA

3.1 n/a 4.1

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

4.2 4.0 4.0Learning

Resources

4.4 4.1 4.3

Organisation

& Management

4.2 4.1 4.2

Academic

Support

4.1 3.8 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 3.5 3.7Overall Satisfaction

4.2 4.1 4.2

Economics

Teaching Quality

4.1 4.1 4.1AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.9

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Page 9: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

4.2 4.2 4.1Learning

Resources

4.1 4.1 4.0

Organisation

& Management

4.0 4.0 4.2Academic

Support

4.1 4.1 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

3.8 4.0 39.Overall Satisfaction

4.4 4.6 4.3

English Studies(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.4 4.5 4.3AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.8

Personal

Development

4.1 3.8 4.1Learning

Resources

4.3 4.2 4.2

Organisation

& Management

4.2 4.1 4.2

Academic

Support

4.0 3.8 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

3.6 3.6 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.0 4.0 4.2

Finance

Teaching Quality

3.8 4.0 4.1AUSA

3.8 n/a 3.9

Page 10: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Personal

Development

4.0 3.8 4.1Learning

Resources

4.1 3.6 4.2

Organisation

& Management

3.0 3.5 3.9Academic

Support

4.4 4.1 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

4.0 3.5 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.3 4.2 4.1

Forensic and Archaeological Science(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.4 4.3 4.2AUSA

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

3.8 4.5 4.2Learning

Resources

4.0 4.3 4.2

Organisation

& Management

3.1 4.2 4.1

Academic

Support

3.7 4.4 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.4 4.0 3.8Overall Satisfaction

3.7 4.3 4.2

French Studies

Teaching Quality

3.9 4.4 4.2AUSA

3.5 n/a 3.9

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Page 11: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

3.9 4.0 4.2Learning

Resources

4.6 4.4 4.3

Organisation

& Management

3.7 3.9 4.1

Academic

Support

4.1 4.4 4.2

Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 3.7 3.7Overall Satisfaction

4.2 4.4 4.4

Genetics(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.1 4.1 4.3AUSA

4.1 n/a 4.1

Personal

DevelopmentLearning

Resources

4.4 4.1 4.3

Organisation

& Management

3.8 3.7 4.1Academic

Support

4.0 3.7 4.2

Assessment &

Feedback

3.4 3.4 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.2 3.9 4.4

Geology

Teaching Quality

4.3 4.0 4.4AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.8

Page 12: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Personal

Development

4.0 4.3 4.2Learning

Resources

3.9 3.8 4.0

Organisation

& Management

4.1 4.2 4.3

Academic

Support

4.0 4.2 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

3.8 3.8 4.0Overall Satisfaction

4.2 4.5 4.4

History(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.3 4.4 4.4AUSA

3.2 n/a 3.7

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Personal

Development

4.2 4.0 4.2Learning

Resources

4.2 4.0 4.2

Organisation

& Management

4.2 3.9 4.2Academic

Support

4.0 4.0 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

3.5 3.8 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.3 4.3 4.2

Human and Social Geography

Teaching Quality

4.2 4.1 4.3AUSA

3.1 n/a 3.9

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Page 13: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

3.8 3.8 4.1Learning

Resources

4.3 3.8 4.2

Organisation

& Management

3.6 3.4 4.0Academic

Support

3.9 3.6 3.7

Assessment &

Feedback

3.6 3.3 3.7Overall Satisfaction

3.9 3.7 4.0

Iberian Studies(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.2 3.6 4.2AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.9

Personal

Development

4.2 4.3 4.3Learning

Resources

4.1 4.2 4.1

Organisation

& Management

3.1 3.3 3.7

Academic

Support

3.8 4.0 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

2.9 3.3 3.7Overall Satisfaction

3.7 3.7 4.1

Initial Teacher Training

Teaching Quality

3.9 4.0 4.1AUSA

3.6 n/a 3.8

Page 14: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Personal

Development

4.4 4.4 4.2Learning

Resources

4.4 4.4 4.2

Organisation

& Management

4.3 4.2 4.1Academic

Support

4.1 4.1 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.8 3.7 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.4 4.4 4.2

Law(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.3 4.3 4.2AUSA

3.6 n/a 3.8

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Personal

Development

3.7 4.0 4.0Learning

Resources

4.0 3.7 4.2

Organisation

& Management

4.0 4.0 4.1Academic

Support

4.0 4.0 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.9 3.6 3.7Overall Satisfaction

4.2 4.2 4.1

Linguistics

Teaching Quality

4.3 4.3 4.2AUSA

3.2 n/a 3.9

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Page 15: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Personal

Development

4.0 4.0 4.1Learning

Resources

4.4 4.1 4.1

Organisation

& Management

4.2 4.0 4.0Academic

Support

4.0 3.8 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 3.4 3.7Overall Satisfaction

4.1 4.0 4.1

Management Studies(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.1 3.9 4.0AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.8

Personal

Development

3.8 3.7 3.9Learning

Resources

3.9 4.0 4.3

Organisation

& Management

3.2 4.0 4.2Academic

Support

4.1 4.1 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

3.6 4.0 3.9Overall Satisfaction

4.2 4.1 4.3

Mathematics and Statistics

Teaching Quality

4.1 4.1 4.1AUSA

3.2 n/a 3.9

Page 16: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Personal

Development

4.1 4.0 4.2Learning

Resources

4.5 4.3 4.2

Organisation

& Management

4.0 3.8 4.0Academic

Support

4.0 3.6 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

3.4 3.1 3.7Overall Satisfaction

4.0 3.7 4.1

Mechanical, Production, Manuf. Eng.(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

3.9 3.7 4.1AUSA

4.0 n/a 3.9

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

4.4 4.6 4.4Learning

Resources

4.4 4.4 4.4

Organisation

& Management

4.0 4.2 3.8Academic

Support

4.4 4.3 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 3.7 3.3Overall Satisfaction

4.5 4.6 4.2

Medicine

Teaching Quality

4.4 4.4 4.2AUSA

3.4 n/a 3.8

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Page 17: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Personal

Development

4.2 4.4 4.2Learning

Resources

4.2 4.4 4.3

Organisation

& Management

3.7 4.0 4.0Academic

Support

4.4 4.5 4.2

Assessment &

Feedback

4.1 4.0 3.7Overall Satisfaction

4.2 4.6 4.3

Microbiology(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.3 4.5 4.2AUSA

3.6 n/a 3.9

Personal

Development

4.1 4.2 4.1Learning

Resources

4.5 4.6 4.3

Organisation

& Management

3.6 3.8 4.1Academic

Support

4.2 4.1 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

4.1 4.1 3.7Overall Satisfaction

4.3 4.5 4.3

Molecular Biology, Biophysics and Biochemistry

Teaching Quality

4.2 4.1 4.2AUSA

4.1 n/a 3.9

Page 18: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Personal

Development

4.3 4.4 4.0Learning

Resources

4.2 4.2 4.0

Organisation

& Management

3.7 4.0 3.8Academic

Support

3.8 4.2 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.4 3.7 3.7Overall Satisfaction

4.4 4.2 4.0

Music(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.2 4.1 4.1AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.6

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Personal

Development

4.2 4.3 4.4Learning

Resources

4.5 4.3 4.2

Organisation

& Management

4.0 4.1 4.0

Academic

Support

4.4 4.1 4.2

Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 4.0 3.7Overall Satisfaction

4.4 4.4 4.3

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy

Teaching Quality

4.2 4.3 4.2AUSA

3.9 n/a 3.9

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Page 19: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

4.3 4.0 4.1Learning

Resources

4.5 4.1 4.2

Organisation

& Management

4.1 4.3 4.2

Academic

Support

4.2 4.1 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

3.8 3.5 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.5 3.9 4.3

Philosophy(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.5 4.2 4.4AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.8

Personal

Development

4.0 4.2 4.2Learning

Resources

4.2 4.1 4.1

Organisation

& Management

4.0 3.9 4.1Academic

Support

4.0 4.1 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

3.5 3.6 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.5 4.4 4.2

Physical Geography and Environmental Science

Teaching Quality

4.2 4.2 4.2AUSA

3.3 n/a 3.8

Page 20: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Personal

Development

4.0 4.2 4.1Learning

Resources

4.2 4.0 4.0

Organisation

& Management

4.1 4.2 4.2

Academic

Support

4.1 4.1 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 3.6 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.1 4.3 4.2

Politics(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.2 4.3 4.3AUSA

3.4 n/a 3.7

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

3.9 4.1 4.0Learning

Resources

4.2 4.2 4.1

Organisation

& Management

4.2 4.2 4.2Academic

Support

4.0 3.9 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 3.9 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.2 4.2 4.2

Psychology

Teaching Quality

4.0 4.1 4.2AUSA

3.6 n/a 3.9

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Page 21: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Personal

Development

3.9 4.2 4.0Learning

Resources

4.0 4.3 3.9

Organisation

& Management

3.9 4.3 4.0Academic

Support

4.0 4.0 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.7 3.9 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.0 4.5 4.1

Sociology(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.1 4.3 4.1AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.8

Personal

Development

4.2 4.5 4.2Learning

Resources

4.1 4.5 4.1

Organisation

& Management

4.1 4.0 4.0

Academic

Support

4.2 4.3 4.1

Assessment &

Feedback

4.1 4.1 3.8Overall Satisfaction

4.2 4.3 4.1

Sports Science

Teaching Quality

4.1 4.2 4.1AUSA

3.6 n/a 3.8

Page 22: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

Personal

Development

4.4 4.1 4.2Learning

Resources

4.3 3.9 4.0

Organisation

& Management

4.3 3.7 4.2Academic

Support

4.5 4.0 4.2

Assessment &

Feedback

4.1 3.6 3.9Overall Satisfaction

4.5 4.3 4.3

Theology and Religious Studies(current) (last year) (UK-wide)

Teaching Quality

4.6 4.3 4.4AUSA

3.7 n/a 3.7

This information is considered statistically significant by both the institution and Ipsos-Mori. You can use it to support your arguments at SSLC meetings.

Personal

Development

4.1 4.3 4.1Learning

Resources

4.2 4.4 4.1

Organisation

& Management

4.1 4.1 4.0

Academic

Support

4.1 4.2 4.0

Assessment &

Feedback

3.4 3.5 3.6Overall Satisfaction

4.0 4.3 4.2

Zoology

Teaching Quality

4.0 4.2 4.2AUSA

3.5 n/a 3.8

Your subject did not receive a high response rate, so this data is not considered statistically significant by the institution or by Ipsos-Mori.

Page 23: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013

Nat

iona

l Stu

dent

Su

rvey

20

12-2

013

For more information on how you as a Class Rep can use the National Student Survey to improve your course, please get in touch with the Education Development Coordinator: [email protected]

This publication was produced for the membership of Aberdeen University Students’ Association in 2012 by Jennifer Krase, the Education Development Coordinator, with support and guidance from the 2012-2013 Education Committee.

We hope it proves useful and can support our nearly 600 Class Reps in making the case for an ever higher-quality University education.

If you’re coming across it in some other capacity, please feel free to use it for inspiration, evidence, or as an example of using the NSS to empower students to campaign to improve their educational experience.

Page 24: National Student Survey for Class Reps 2012-2013