National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies At a Crossroads of Security...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies At a Crossroads of Security...
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
At a Crossroads of Security Cooperation
“Strategic Opportunities” Panel 1:
Today’s Strategic Environment in the Americas
John A. (Jay) Cope, Colonel, USA (ret.)
Senior Research Fellow, INSS
10 March 2005The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the
National Defense University, the Department of Defense or the U.S. government.
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
“The most important failure was one of imagination.”Report of the 9/11 Commission
Example: “Ultimately, the foundation of American strength is at home.” National Security Strategy (2002)
But has the globalized environment changed the concept of “home”?
Does the foundation of national strength reach beyond borders?
Should national defense begin beyond legal frontiers?
Are government institutions, decision-making processes and mindsets ready to address the reality of interdependence and its trade offs?
A Shared Challenge
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
The old paradigms no longer apply.
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
US Engagement at Today’s Critical Point
Diplomatic “Hub and Spoke” Zones of Special Concern
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Conditions at Today’s Crossroads
Progressive trends: Shared democratic values but different political cultures Economic growth and regionalism
• Tied to world economy, foreign investment, Chinese demand• Remittances and free trade agreements• Sub-regional economic integration (political too?)• Transportation infrastructure modernization and expansion
No serious antagonism between countries but history and “zero-sum” mindset still hinder relations
Colombian model for reestablishing state sovereignty• National commitment; military reform; interagency planning;
work with neighbors
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Conditions at Today’s Crossroads
Regressive trends: Declining faith in democracy in many countries
• Weak national institutions for domestic politics, development, personal security, and justice
• Politicized segments of societies• Shifts to the Left; rise of populism as way out of poverty• Demographics complicate
Inability of state to control all national territory Anti-Americanism; competition for influence in region Decreasing US government presence, available
resources, and influence
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Environmental issues Public security “Coup of the streets” Lawless non-state actors:
• Violent armed groups (from youth gangs to insurgents)• Transnational crime (drugs, arms, other)• Poorly or ungoverned national territory
International and domestic terrorism Traditional pressures:
• Boundary disputes • Balancing power
Multidimensional Security Challenges
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Protecting U.S. from Attack
Pre WWII: Two vast oceans; strong navy Friendly Canada, Mexico Region without military rival Monroe Doctrine
Pre 9/11 – add: Nuclear deterrent Aerospace defense with
Canada (NORAD) 1947 Rio Treaty Geo-strategic principle
• Ability to act globally without resource/prestige drain enhanced by a stable region, at peace (democratic), and prosperous
Post 9/11 – add: Proactive defense in depth in
all dimensions• Forward regions of world and
global commons of space and cyberspace
• Geographic approaches to US territory
• Within US Plus an expanded NORAD? Future missile defense
system? Geo-strategic principle?
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Lingering Questions
Geo-strategic Principle Do Latin American states and Canada share US belief
that the ability to act globally is enhanced by a stable, peaceful, democratic and prosperous hemisphere?
Will they assume leadership roles in working toward this goal?
Defending the Southern Approach to the US This quadrant is at risk and close to home Is there a more effective way to defend this approach in
today’s threat and resource constrained environment?
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Indicators of Strategic Change
Use of military in Latin engagement Four countries joined Iraq coalition: El Salvador remains Response to crisis in Bolivia and Haiti UN peacekeeping (integrated units); OAS demining
Chilean, Argentine and Canadian military and/or police programs of assistance in region
Regional integration (SICA, CARICOM, MERCOSUR) Defense and security cooperation (RSS and CFAC)
Amazon surveillance system (SIVAM) Linkage with neighbors (confidence building)
PANAMAX series of multinational exercises
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Significance of Indicators
Recognition that political and economic health of the hemisphere cannot be dictated from Washington
Some states share interest in realizing regional stability, democratic values and prosperity Community response to regional crisis is possible
Strategic interests are shared with US (e.g., Panama Canal)
Niche military roles and interoperability are possible
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Southern Approach to US
States in Caribbean Basin face all threats in the hemisphere in one place at one time Problems interconnect Thriving smuggling networks
• Example: 300 - 330 metric tons of cocaine enter US annually
Disconnect on perception of main threat Circumscribed cooperation
Mexico; “Third Border Initiative”
Decreasing US assets available No geo-strategic vision
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Suspect Maritime and Air Activity1 January –31 December 2004
Maritime Air
Total109 Tracks
Pacific111 Tracks
Caribbean295 Tracks
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Arms
Arms
Cocaine
Cocaine
Control over Transit
Control of Sea/CommerceJamaica Key
Defend HomelandMexico Key
Mahan, Early 20th Century Early 21st Century
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Strategic “Covering Force Area”• Holistic, comprehensive regional approach• Premise: cooperation among LAC nations• Mexico: hub; mesh with Central America, RSS/ CARICOM, US (NORAD)• Focus: transnat’l crime; air and maritime surveillance and response (JIATF-South,
“Enduring Friendship”) • One Unified Command supports approach
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
Notional Future Regional Cooperation·Air/Sea Surveillance and Response · Disaster Assistance · Expeditionary Capability
SIVAM +
NORAD
Mexico-Caribbean BasinSurveillance System
National Defense University – Institute for National Strategic Studies
And Finally,
Reminder: “The most important failure was one of imagination.”
[email protected]; 202-685-2373www.ndu.edu/inss/insshp.html