Ncg | group about | ncg group ab [email protected] +46 8 611 76 20 .
naturegreatermanchester.co.uk | @GMGreenCity |...
Transcript of naturegreatermanchester.co.uk | @GMGreenCity |...
naturegreatermanchester.co.uk | @GMGreenCity | #GMGreenCity
Delivering a Greener Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester Natural Capital Group Annual Conference
11th February 20209.30 to 16.30 Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce
Seminar 1
Managing Land for Carbon
Bryan CosgroveCity of Trees
Dr Amanda Wright & Tom Smart
Natural England
To kick off…..
Hands Up if…
• You own or manage land in GM?
• You manage land for carbon benefits?
• You are interested in managing for carbon in future?
This session will cover:
• The role trees and peat can play in managing carbon
• Their wider natural capital benefits
• The current status of trees and peatland across the City Region
• An exploration of what more we can do to maximise these natural capital assets and their potential
Why should we care about
Carbon?
What does GM have? Current tree asset….
Tree cover by ward
Existing Tree Cover in GM
Question…
How many trees do you think there are in Greater Manchester?
Peat is widespread across Greater Manchester…
GM has 17,500 hectares of peatlands in its administrative boundary, of which…
• Over 11,000 ha are upland habitats (over 200m a.s.l).
• Over 6,000 ha are lowland peat.
Much of this peat is strikingly deep(over 5m deep in some areas)!
Did you know…
Peat has a massive carbon storage and sequestration potential:
10-12cm of peat stores as much carbon as a forestcovering the same area!
… and on our doorstep.
We are bordered by extensive upland peatlands
Additional ecosystem services and natural capital benefits from beyond administrative boundary:• Carbon sequestration• Flood risk mitigation• Air and water quality• Biodiversity value• … and more!
BUT these benefits can become risks (floods, wildfire) if peatland mismanaged.
Lowland sites can store huge quantities of carbon
EastWest
South
North
EastWest
Depth
Chat Moss contains 2,800 ha of continuous peat mass, with a total peat volume > 35 million cubic metres.
Local estimates suggest ~80 kg of C per m3.
= 2.8m tons of carbon stored at Chat Moss, and data from only 75% of the site!
Massive C storage and sequestration opportunities, but these opportunities being missed. Why?
What are the issues?
Problems on PeatDrainage, fertilisation and extraction turns the peat from a carbon sink to a carbon source.
Only ~3.5% of our lowland peat is in restored or near-natural state.
By contrast, > 40% is under cropland and intensive grassland.
These land uses are the ‘worst’ emitters of Carbon on peat.
© Peel L&P© Lancs Wildlife Trust
© Keith Williamson
Near-Natural/Restored
Heavily drained cropland
Quarry/peat extraction
Chat Moss: estimated emissions = 70 kt CO2-eq/year.
This is the equivalent of driving a family car 11,500 times round the equator, every year!
…and more than £4.5 million in carbon credits annually.
Problems on Peat
Land Cover Total ha
CO2-eq
(T/ha/y)Annual GHG (T
CO2-eq/y)
Bare/Extracted Peat 122.7 13.84 1698.3
Cropland 1161.3 38.98 45269.3
Developed 214.0 NA NA
Grass-Dominated Modified Bog 93.5 3.4 317.8
Intensive Grassland 656.4 29.89 19621.0
Open Water 29.0 NA NA
Rewetted Bog 102.3 0.81 82.8
Rewetted Fen 47.3 6.37 301.3
Woodland 373.3 9.91 3699.4
Total 2799.8 70989.9
What are the issues?
Trees…
• Historic losses/Low tree cover
• low planting rates - Only 1,420 hectares (3,507 acres) of trees were planted in England in the year to March 2019, against the government’s target of 5,000 hectares
• Disease/neglect
• Development – tree replacements not sufficient
• land availability
What do we need to do differently?
‘Our use of land must change to meet the UK’s Net Zero target’
• Plant more trees – at least 3 million!• Tree replacements at greater value than being lost• Trees as assets – understanding value
• Manage the land cover over peat to reduce emissions and increase storage potential
Paludiculture Palus (swamp) + cultura (cultivation)
Paludiculture = the cultivation of wetlands and wetland crops
Paludiculture is NOT nature conservation, it is agriculturethat can restore the peat layer.
Paludicultural crops include:
• Reeds
• Sedges
• Sphagnum mosses (carbon farming)
Research in Germany shows that sphagnum farms can rapidly begin sequestering carbon. © peakdistrict.gov
Sphagnum moss cultivation
Reed and sedge cultivation
Slide courtesy of Lancs Wildlife Trust
Why paludiculture? From carbon emission to sequestration
(Jurasinki et al, 2016)Slide courtesy of Lancs Wildlife Trust
Transition to paludicultural crops raises the water table, reduces emissions and restores the peat layer.
Discussion session:
What do you think are the barriers for managing land for carbon?
What do we need to do to overcome these barriers?
and, how can we maximise the benefits of trees and peat in GMs net zero challenge?
Why aren’t we making the changes?
Positive Note - current policy landscape
For trees:
• Trees and Woodland Strategy – 3m trees - 500,000 since 2016
• Northern forest – 50 million
• Government Planting Target - 30 million trees a year by 2025
• Budget – increased settlement for FC?
• Tree Champion – Sir William Worsley
• New incentives
Woodland Creation Incentives
And for peat…
Peatland Incentives
• Public funding – ELMS and Environmental Stewardship
• Grants – e.g. IUCN UK Peatland Programme (funded by Peter De HaanCharitable Trust) and National Lottery
• Private – through GM Natural Capital Investment Plan
• And the IUCN Peatland code
Any further questions?
For further info…
• http://cityoftrees.org.uk/
• https://naturalengland.blog.gov.uk/2019/08/12/peat-pilots-set-to-revive-english-peatlands/
Thank you!
Seminar 2
32
Collaborating on the Delivery of Integrated Catchment Solutions
Craig Higson and Sion Platts-Kilburn
33
Introduction
Organisational challenges in delivering environmental outcomes, such as achieving ‘good’ status
What is the challenge?
There is a need to look to the future and different ways of working to meet the challenge
What is the need?
Discussing respective approaches in the Croal Catchment for illustration
Example?
Share you thoughts on the challenges and opportunities to deliver solutions in collaboration
What is the ask today?
34
To promote natural capital and environmental stewardships
To reduce uncertainties around catchment management
To drive affordable solutions for water bill payers through the creation of markets to develop fair share investment
To develop better ways of working through co-governance, collaboration and partnerships, sharing investment and risk
Considering what is best for the environment and communities, integrating risks and driving multiple natural capital benefits delivering improvements to understand the needs of the catchment, identifying what is best of the catchment and communities:
Water quality, biodiversity, climate change, flooding, health & wellbeing, recreation & amenity, air quality
United Utilities – Catchment Systems Thinking Understanding the whole catchment and the needs of customers and stakeholders
35
United Utilities – Catchment Systems Thinking
SCaMP Developed in Water Catchments
SCaMP was an innovative and large scale project designed to:
- Improve catchment quality - Meet nature conservation objectives
- Improve raw water quality - Ensure a sustainable future for agricultural tenants
Catchment Systems Thinking
CaST allows us to use natural capital decision making to consider whatis best for the environment, customers and communities, integratingrisks and driving multiple natural capital benefits to deliver:
- Water quality and Flooding- Future development and population growth- Resilience- Socio-economic impact
SCAMP 12005
SCAMP 2, MooreLIFE, & DWI Safety Plan
2010
SCAMP 3, MooreLIFE2020, Natural Course and
CAP - 2015
Catchment Systems Thinking Approach
2017
Catchment Systems
Operation2040
36
Environment Agency - CLIMB
37
Example: Croal CatchmentChallenges…
Moderate WFD
status Flooding
Technical challenges such as funding streams and
procurement
38
…and Opportunities
Proposed AMP7 CroalUID locations
EA Consented Investment Programme
Net GainEA Non-consented investment programme
Example: Croal Catchment
39
Example: Croal CatchmentRecap
Key Challenges Opportunities
Flooding
Moderate WFD Status
Technical e.g. funding streams
EA Non-consented investment programme
Redevelopment
EA Consented Investment Programme
AMP7 Croal UID locations
Net Gain
40
Discussion
Key Challenges Opportunities
Flooding
Moderate WFD Status
Technical e.g. funding streams
EA Non-consented investment programme
Redevelopment
EA Consented Investment Programme
AMP7 Croal UID locations
Net Gain
Perspective: what are your thoughts on the challenges,
opportunities to deliver integrated catchment solutions?
Collaboration: what areas of opportunity do we have for
collaboration?
Seminar 3
Developing a Nature Recovery Network for Greater Manchester
Greater Manchester Natural Capital Group
Annual Conference
11th February 2020
The Nature Recovery Network.
• An aspiration in the Governments 25 Year Environment Plan.
• Connecting, restoring and creating places rich in wildlife, resilient to climate change and enjoyed by people.
• The GM context - Urban centres to rural hinterland. Lowland to upland.
The Nature Recovery Network high level ambition
Connecting, restoring and creating places that are:
• rich in wildlife
• resilient to climate change
• enjoyed by people.
The NRN will create a network of nature rich places that are resilient to climate change and contribute to achieving net zero by 2050.
Whether this is by locking up carbon through peatland restoration, creating new woods, slowing flood waters.
With nature based solutions we can confront the twin crises of biodiversity loss and climate change.
Core aspirations.
• A truly national network … not discrete projects - a strategic spatial framework for nature recovery and ecosystem restoration in both the terrestrial and marine environment.
• For nature and people – a rural and urban network providing socio-economic benefits.
• Built locally – a strategic framework locally-owned.
• Targeting and prioritising effort and investment.
• A ‘shared endeavour’ approach: planning, delivery, ownership.
• Engaging a wide range of partners.
Greater Manchester is an ecologically diverse City Region
Greater Manchester’s 6 Strategic Habitats:
• Uplands.
• Lowland Wetlands.
• Woodlands and Trees.
• Rivers.
• Grasslands.
• Urban Green Infrastructure.
Where are we now? GM’s diverse habitats
Legend
GM Administrative Boundary
Lowland raised bog
Blanket bog
Lowland fens
Upland flushes, fens and swamps
Reedbeds
Upland heathland
Fragmented heath
Lowland heathland
Mountain heaths and willow scrub
Purple moor grass and rush pastures
Grass moorland
Upland calcareous grassland
Upland hay meadow
Calaminarian grassland
Good quality semi-improved grassland
Lowland meadows
Lowland calcareous grassland
Lowland dry acid grassland
Deciduous woodland
Traditional orchard
Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh
Coastal saltmarsh
Coastal sand dunes
Saline lagoons
Coastal vegetated shingle
Limestone pavement
Maritime cliff and slope
Mudflats
No main habitat but additional habitats present
Where are we now? A network of protected sites
Where are we now? GM Local Wildlife Sites
Where are we now? Species Data - Distribution of Great Crested Newts in GM
Where are we now? Species Data – Distribution of Badgers in GM
Modelling wetland networks at a national scale
Legend
GM Administrative Boundary
Class
Priority Habitat
Associated Habitats
Restorable Habitat
Habitat Restoration-Creation
Fragmentation Action Zone
Network Enhacement Zone 1
Network Enhacement Zone 2
Network Expansion Zone
… and at a local scale
Collaborative working for multiple Nature Recovery benefits
Local Example of NRN Delivery - Central Stockport (Mersey Valley) Ecological Network
Going forward – some initial ideas
Three core strands of activity.
• Expand and integrate the evidence base and mapping.
• Develop future strategy and policy –including links to future Local Nature Recovery Strategies.
• Establish an implementation framework and long term governance.
Strand 1 – Evidence and mapping
Build on existing evidence for Ecological Networks, Natural Capital/Green Infrastructure and ecosystem services.
Establish an agreed Nature Recovery Network map for the City Region integrating the surrounding hinterland.
Strand 1 – Evidence & Mapping
• What is missing from the evidence that we already have for GM?
• Is there any evidence that you are aware of that we haven’t covered?
Strand 2 – Policy and Strategy.
Develop links to City Region and local policy frameworks, including the planning system.
Develop a strategy for future local Nature Recovery.
Strand 2- Policy and Strategy
• How should we take forward the development of a NRN for GM?
Strand 3 – Implementation Framework.
• Develop local Governance arrangements for long term implementation of the NRN.
• Integrate local objectives for Nature Recovery (ecosystems) and Natural Capital/Green Infrastructure (ecosystem services).
• Develop a resourcing strategy (including with Biodiversity Net Gain delivery and ELMS etc).
• Engage the wider public.
Ecological crisis
Climate change crisis
Health and well-being crisis.
Strand 3 - Implementation Framework
• How does this fit into existing governance arrangements – who needs to be involved in the development?
And finally. A Nature Recovery Network for Greater Manchester – what is the very next thing we need to do?
From urban core.
To rural hinterland.
Seminar 4
Increasing investment in Greater Manchester’s natural capital
#GMGreencity
Us:- Sam Evans, GMCA- Matt Ellis, Environment Agency- Jamie Mansfield, Environmental Finance
YOU!
This session
#GMGreencity
“The management of natural capital draws upon a relatively limited suite of business models and financing strategies”
Why?
• Limited suite of business models
• Lack of scale and aggregation
• Lack of business cases
• Lack of arrangements for delivery, accountability and governance
Developing business models
How can this be overcome?- Support the development of new business models- Provide a supportive policy environment
What are we doing together? - Fill the gap – selecting a partner to deliver a GM
Environment Fund- IGNITION – develop NBS business models.- Exploring carbon (via local offsetting) and habitat banking (via Biodiversity Net Gain).
Aggregating projects at scale
How can this be overcome?- Support the development of pipelines of projects across
multiple sites.
What are we doing together? - Spatial mapping – identify opportunities and sites for
investment.- IGNITION – build initial SuDS pipeline.
Supporting business case development
How can this be overcome?- Support project sponsors with technical support and
assistance
What are we doing together? - Designing the Environment Fund- IGNITION – business case for SuDS pipeline
Governance, accountability and delivery
How can this be overcome?- Establish city-region level governance arrangements for
investing in projects
What are we doing? - Establish a GM Environment Fund- IGNITION – develop delivery vehicle for SuDS pipeline
Overcoming the challenges to increasing investment in GM’s natural environment
The IGNITION experience
11 February 2020
Matt Ellis
This should be easy
because Nature ‘pays’,
doesn’t it?
1. NC projects often only draw on a
limited suite of business models and
financing strategies
2. Difficulty to aggregate NC projects into
pipelines at scale
3. Where projects exist, investible
business cases often do not
4. Delivery, accountability governance
arrangements can be lacking
Sadly, its not that straight
forward…
Create a project pipeline
Develop business
models and funding
mechanisms
Build investor
confidence
Create an enabling
environment through
stakeholder engagement
Create a Living Lab
Develop a special purpose
vehicle to contract to deliver and
maintain the projects
IGNITION – a stepwise
solution to overcoming the
challenges?
A business case for a SuDS
retrofit pipeline
By summer 2020 – developing
a business case for
investment in a package of
publicly owned sites suitable
for SuDS.
An Illustration - The Moorlands
Primary School demo site
• A 239 pupils in Sale, part
of the Borough of Trafford
• Originally band 6 - £5364
497m2 disconnected to
drop to band 5
• At time of intervention, a
saving of £2950pa was
generated, or circa £45k
over 15 years
Financially viable Financially and technically
viable
GM Sites 335 219
Capex £3.4m
15yr saving £6.2m
SuDS M2 105,000m2 – over 15 Wembley football pitches
A SuDS pipeline package at
scale that makes returns for the
investor?
Create a project pipeline
Develop business
models and funding
mechanisms
Build investor
confidence
Create an enabling
environment through
stakeholder engagement
Create a Living Lab
Develop a special purpose
vehicle to contract to deliver and
maintain the projects
IGNITION – will it overcome
the challenges?
www.ignitiongm.com
© Environmental Finance Limited 86
Investment Advisory Fund Advisory and Creation Fund Management
Introduction to Environmental Finance
EF is the UK’s leading environmental impact investment adviser, offering corporate finance advisory and fund management services across the natural and built environment.
Our Clients
Environmental Finance Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority under registration number 831569.
© Environmental Finance Limited 87
What is the opportunity for investment?
Environmental Finance is working with the GMCA to develop and launch a Greater Manchester Environment Fund.
• Greater Manchester has ambitious targets to become a leading European green city and achieve carbon neutrality by 2038.
• There is considerable need to mobilise additional investment to deliver Greater Manchester’s natural capital priorities.
• The GMCA are developing a Greater Manchester Environment Fund (GMEF) to support the city region with its green ambitions.
• The GMEF will take a strategic approach to increase investment in the city region’s natural capital.
Amount of funding needed each year to preserve and restore global ecosystems
£300bn
Growth in the Green Bonds Market from 2012-16, rising from £1.5bn to £150bn with an expected demand of c.£400bn
£8bn
316%
Private investments tracked per year into ecosystem restoration and climate resilience in the US
Global natural capital investment opportunity
© Environmental Finance Limited 88
Why is investment needed?
Projects that protect or enhance Greater Manchester’s natural capital require a significant amount of funding
Greater Manchester’s NC Project Funding Need
Gap
Potential GMEF
Donative Income**
Total Estimated Funding Needs for Already identified
Natural Capital Projects*
>£100mNeed to identify new forms of finance to
deliver the city region’s natural capital
objectives
* Based on initial list of 26 projects; a further 25 projects have been identified but not yet costed.** Will depend upon a separate process to be performed to raise charitable donations.
Health and wellbeing
Water quality payments
Flood management
Agri-environment
Biodiversity offsets
Carbon credits
Business levies
Ecotourism
Emerging Revenue Sources for GM’s NC Projects
© Environmental Finance Limited 89
What are the potential funding sources for the GMEF?
Donations
1
Charges / taxes
2
Payments for Ecosystem Services / Levies and credits
3
Landfill tax
Enforcement Funds
Petrol taxes
Plastic bag / cup levies
Carparking charges
Biodiversity offsets
Water quality
paymentsFlood
paymentsCarbon credits
Business levies
Company sponsorship
Individual donations
National government
PhilanthropyLocal
government
© Environmental Finance Limited 90
What could the GMEF look like?
The GMEF could provide governance and leverage funding to support the development and implementation of investable natural capital business models to deliver a significant increase in investment in the city region
Greater Manchester Environment FundUnrestricted donations /
income
Charitable Trust(s)
Environmental Projects
Carbon Trading Vehicle
Habitat Bank
Facility
Investment Readiness Funding
Management
Contract
Investors
Returns
Investment
Investment
Local Enterprise
Fund
Investment Strategy and Governance
Restricted donations /
income
Direct Grants
Third party verification
Returns
© Environmental Finance Limited 91
Example Investment Model: Habitat Bank
Greater Manchester has ambitious targets to embed biodiversity net gain within development, providing a strategic opportunity to lead the creation of a Habitat Bank as an operating system to deliver specific biodiversity targets of different local authorities across the city region.
Project Structure
Habitat Bank Facility
LA Habitat
Bank
Loan
LA Habitat
Bank
Property developer(s)
Local authority(s)
Mitigation payments
Mitigation payments
Investment Returns
Investors
Biodiversity credits
VerificationIndependent verification
Habitat Bank OperatorBiodiversity
credits
Management
Baseline assessments
Example
HabitatsHabitats
EndowmentPortion of
credits
Fees
Repayment
Funding
Contract
© Environmental Finance Limited 92
Potential Habitat Bank Pilot Programme
Habitat Bank Facility
Investment in priority habitats of each LA
A near-term pilot could take place with interested local authorities to raise investment through a Habitat Bank Vehicle, while enabling Local Authorities to retain control of their own mitigation payments and habitat creation priorities.
VerificationIndependent verification
Habitat Bank
Salford
Habitat Bank
Stockport
Habitat Bank
Oldham
Loans Repayments
© Environmental Finance Limited 93
Example Investment Model: Carbon Trading Vehicle
With GMCA’s ambition to become carbon neutral by 2038 and an increasing corporate focus on carbon mitigation efforts, GMCA is in a strong position to develop a carbon trading vehicle to accredit and monetise carbon credits from natural assets.
Example
GM’s Carbon Sink Assets
Carbon Trading Vehicle
Investors Corporates
Accredited carbon credits
Carbon funding
Investment in GM carbon assets
Investment
Returns
Verification
Independent verification
Project Structure
Accredited carbon credits
© Environmental Finance Limited 94
Questions
• What are the potential sources of funding for the GMEF?
• What are the other potential Natural Capital Investment Models that could be prioritised?
• What is needed to establish the Investment Models?
−Who needs to be involved?
−What projects could be piloted?
−What are the risks/barriers?
© Environmental Finance LimitedEnvironmental Finance Limited, W106 Vox Studios1-45 Durham Street London, SE11 5JH
Phone: +44 (0) 203 664 0934
Web: www.environmentalfinance.co.uk
Environmental Finance Limited
W106 Vox Studios
1-45 Durham Street
London SE11 5JH
Seminar 5
EMBEDDING GREEN AND
BLUE PRESCRIPTION IN
SOCIAL PRESCRIBING
February 2020
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
Inhalers
• The climate and ecological
crisis is the greatest threat
to our health and wellbeing
• Increase inequalities
(locally, globally,
intergenerational)
• GMHSC is committed to a
comprehensive
sustainability plan
• Partnership working
through the Greater
Manchester Five Year
Plan for the Environment
Climate Emergency
Declaration
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
Natural environment Ambitions
• GMHSCP will ensure that their approach to developing a Greater Manchester
Population Health system understands the importance of the natural
environment as a key wider determinant of health, and seeks to ensure that
action undertaken is reflective of that understanding.
• GMHSCP will promote the health benefits of green space to their staff,
patients and the wider community and will maximise the opportunities to
incorporate this into their programmes such as, but not exclusive to, those
relating to Person and Community Centred Approaches (PCCA), Physical
Activity, Mental Wellbeing and Clean Air. Where possible, GMHSCP will
maximise the availability of green and natural areas on estates.
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
GM SOCIAL PRESCRIBING
Person & Community Centred Approaches
10 localities now have social prescribing
Established GM Social Prescribing
Network
Link worker development:
connecting and supporting the local workforce
Sustainability of Social Prescribing and community investment
within placed-based integration and PCN
PROGRESS
PRIORITIES
AIMS
13,000
referrals by
March 2020
Social Prescribing IT
platform implementation
Social Prescribing IT platform to record & track
activity/outcomes
GM Toolkit for
Social
Prescribing
Q2 numbers 13,000
Successful bid to
digital fund for one
SP IT platform
Largest city region to
have social
prescribing available
Implementation of platform and
shared outcomes framework
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
EXAMPLES GREEN & BLUE SOCIAL PRESCRIPTIONS…TO NAME BUT A FEW…1. International:
– https://bluehealth2020.eu/
2. National:
– Social Farms & Gardens: https://www.farmgarden.org.uk/
– https://idlewomen.org/2019/07/24/mud-to-medicine/
3. National/Local
– RHS Bridgewater Wellbeing Garden: https://www.rhs.org.uk/gardens/bridgewater
4. Regional:
– Sow the City :http://www.sowthecity.org/
5. Local:
– Garden Needs: https://gardenneeds.org.uk
– Incredible Education: https://www.incredibleeducation.co.uk/
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
WHAT'S THE EVIDENCE
FOR USING GREEN AND
BLUE PRESCRIPTIONS?
• Well, it gets you out of the house for a start off, it gets you to meet people, people you've never seen before, and you become friends and, you know,
• “And we are being … you feel as though you are being of some value”
• “It’s the sense of achievement of how you do something, you see growing”.
• It’s helped me in as much as I'm a lot more activated outside, with the digging and planting and harvesting
Bragg, R & Leck, J (2017): The role of nature-based interventions:
Natural England.
Soga M, Cox DTC, Yamaura Y, Gaston KJ, Kurisu K, Hanaki K. Health
Benefits of Urban Allotment Gardening: Improved Physical and
Psychological Well-Being and Social Integration. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14(1).
Whear R, Coon JT, Bethel A, Abbott R, Stein K, Garside R. What Is the
Impact of Using Outdoor Spaces Such as Gardens on the Physical and
Mental Well-Being of Those With Dementia? A Systematic Review of
Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence. Journal of the American Medical
Directors Association. 2014;15(10):697-705.
Mixed methods….
Howarth, Brettle, Hardman & Maden (2018)
Published Evidence
“I think this place…well, I know that
this place has saved my life”
Increasing engagement with our natural environment.
Why Myplace?• Inverse Care Law- Julian Tudar Hart in a paper for The Lancet
(1971). Those who most need health care are least likely to receive it.
• Our history so far (Big Lottery/ ESF)• 11 yrs through to Men in Sheds (50yrs plus)• It should feel therapeutic without being a treatment- we are non
clinical • Small groups, supported engagement and connection to nature• Create positive environments• Build resilience banks
Where does Myplace sit as an NHS partner?
• Recovery Strategy
• Public Health prevention
• Social Prescribing and those who can not self serve.
• Respite
How did we set up Myplace?
• Recruitment of staff
• Staff training/ ongoing CPD
• Risk assessments
• Small groups with high staff, volunteer, trainee numbers
• Network of ecotherapy hubs
• Outreach work
• Non clinical interventions
• Engaging with the NHS- Top down vs bottom up.
Referrals
• Where they come from
• How we manage them, a central database
• fast response
• Initial meeting
• Registration, evaluation and monitoring
• Safeguarding and appropriateness of referrals
Myplace 5 types of practical activity:
Bushcraft
Practical Conservation
EnvironmentalMindfulness
GrowingProjects
Wildlife Walks
What and How?Person-centred Delivery
Personal Development
• Outcome Stars (workstar/ youthstar/ wellbeing star)• The positive challenge of ESF- creating realistic aspirations is
important for improving wellbeing. Our Bright Future key ask, a request for more employment options. Reaching Communities-isolation and social development.
• Creating a strong network of people championing Natures Recovery
• Coproduction needs to be central.• Youth Council• Health and Wellbeing Forum
Numbers- How are we doing?• Supported over 1200 participants so far
• 400+ referrals from LCFT, increasing continually, Now receiving referrals from GMMH in Bolton.
• Over 30 sessions per week.
Waiting list work with CAMHS, Mindsmatter, East Lancashire Childrens Psychology Team and proactive outreach with HARRI and Community Restart, as well as the Recovery College.
Outreach- a change in approach• Community Lunch Clubs• GPs• Supported housing schemes• Job Centres• Schools, Pupil referral units, SEND• Self Referrals and many more
-
What are our Measures?
• Numbers of participants• Wellbeing (outcome stars and evaluations-
WEMWEBS/ Loneliness/ Connection to nature/ Resilience/ Qualitative/ post intervention)
• Education, employment, and training• Personal development• Greenspaces improved• Community Engagement
The Cove The Harbour
Ecotherapy at inpatients facilities
Growing DemandChorley HospitalBlackburn HospitalBolton HospitalPrestwich
What next?
• Work based interventions
• Early intervention
• More work with Primary Care and Public Health (eg Suicide Prevention Fund)
• Wider partnership work (Mind)
• Wider training and support for those on other programmes across LWT.
• Strategy for increased core commissioning
• Increased research, pushing for systemic change.
Evaluation Data
• UCLan
• External Evaluator
• Contributing to TWT research
• Challenges and learning
• Warrick Ed. Results for young people, overall move from 45.8 to 47. For those who start with below ave wellbeing they increase by 7.1
• Results for adults range from 42 to 52, and for those with below ave wellbeing it rises by 12.5 points.
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT…GOOD
1. Green and blue prescriptions could be used as part of a
social prescription?
2. What are the key enablers and challenges…
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
SURVEY OF SOCIAL PRESCRIBING
LEADS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Fully Understand Some Understanding
Awareness Level of Benefits of Nature/Green Space
% Responding
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
SURVEY OF SOCIAL PRESCRIBING LEADS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Frequently Sometimes Never
Frequecy of Referrals to Nature Programms
% Responding
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
BARRIERS
“NHS priorities
getting in the way of
prevention agendas”
“Lack of awareness
and connections”
“Cost to those
organisations
referred to (can VCSE
cope with increased
numbers?)” 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Unsure how to find Unsure about offerdetails
Other
Barriers to Referring/Linking with Nature Based Programmes
% Responding
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
KEY QUESTIONS TO EMBEDDING GREEN AND BLUE PRESCRIPTIONS INTO SOCIAL PRESCRIBING
1.How can we encourage social prescribing
schemes to value the natural environment?
2.How do we use the evidence to promote
the use of green and blue prescriptions?
3.How do we support social prescribing
schemes to better access the natural
environment?
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
DISCUSSION ON HOW WE MEET PREVIOUSLY LISTED CHALLENGES
1.What's the priority we are looking to address?
2.Where do we want to get to?
3.What are we currently doing to get there?
4.What else do we need to do?
5.Who else needs to be involved?
Greater Manchester Health
and Social Care Partnership
GET IN TOUCHEmail- [email protected]
email – [email protected]
phone- 01772 872007
Website- www.lancswt.org.uk/myplace
Follow us on social media
Twitter: @myplace2gr0w
Facebook: Myplace2gr0w
Instagram: @myplaceproject
Sophie Glinka | Social Prescribing
Lead
Greater Manchester Health & Social
Care Partnership
07746852134
[email protected] MICHELLE HOWARTH
Senior Lecturer/ Deputy Director
PGR
School of Health & Society
Salford University