NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014Slide 1 NAPHSIS ANNUAL MEETING | Seattle | June 8-11, 2014 VITAL RECORDS:...
-
Upload
phoenix-whitsett -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014Slide 1 NAPHSIS ANNUAL MEETING | Seattle | June 8-11, 2014 VITAL RECORDS:...
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 1NAPHSIS ANNUAL MEETING | Seattle | June 8-11, 2014
VITAL RECORDS: A CULTURE OF QUALITY
Navigating a Vital Records Future in an e-Health Era
Bill Brand, MPHDirector, Informatics Science
Public Health Informatics Institute
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 2
Basic premises
• Today’s EHR systems are struggling to met the demands being placed on them
• New generation of public health information systems will be required
• Increased focus on population health improvement brings opportunities and challenges for health departments
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 3
About PHII
Transforming health practitioners’ ability to
apply information effectively to improve
health outcomes worldwide.
• Informatics Academy• Requirements Laboratory• Practice Support
Part of the non-profit Task Force for Global Health in Decatur, Georgia
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 4
EHR SYSTEMS: EQUAL TO THE TASK?
Slide 4
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 5
EHR Systems: Equal to the task?
• Current adoption rates• Impact of Meaningful Use and EHR
certification programs• Current limitations in e-health and health
reform era
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 6
EHR Adoption by US Hospitals
ONC Data Brief No. 16 May 2014 ■ ■Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. Non-federal Acute Care Hospitals: 2008-2013
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 7
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 8
Physician adoption of EHRs
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 9
Impact of MU and Certification
• Meaningful Use (MU) accelerated trends already underway
• EHR certification – Standardized functionality– Increased buyer confidence (somewhat)
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 10
Future of MU in doubt?• Only four hospitals had attested successfully
for stage 2 (as of May 13)!• Predictions that ~80% will apply for hardship
exemptions – Many may just leave the program
• Increasing pressure to slow down MU process• Certification may shift away from complete
EHR systemsSource: John Halamka, MD, Keynote at Boston Health IT Summit, May 13, 2014
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 11
EHR limitations
• Major dissatisfaction with usability– Don’t match workflows– Increasingly seen as patient
safety concern• Not designed as health
care improvement and population health management tools
• Still too many proprietary codes and other idiosyncrasies to be effectively interoperable
• Need to be re-designed for today’s goals
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 12
INTEROPERATING WITH EHR SYSTEMS
Slide 12
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 13
Public health reporting in an e-health era
• Data reported to HDs increasingly being collected for other purposes– “Enter once, use many times”– Public health as secondary user– No longer control the information value chain– Must understand the who, what, why
• Decreasing interest/ability to interact with stand-alone, external systems
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 14
Implications for public health
• Must work within the world of healthcare standards– Must be proactive in developing standards needed for
public health functions– Example: eVitals using HL7 and IHE
• Make functionality seamlessly available to EHR or others systems– Increasingly “behind the scenes”
• Contribute to getting social determinant data in EHRs
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 15
Issues for Vital Registration• Will data be structured in EHR as needed for
VR?• Will EHR support additional data entry for VR?• Will EHR data systems support data quality
checks for VR?• Will EHR support needed accountability for VR
reporters?• Will the process support providers’ and VRs’
business needs?Source: Seth Foldy, MD, 2013 NAPHSIS Conference
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 16
Vital Registrar/NCHS/PH perspective• BETTER?
– Data received more accurate/appropriate/precise?– Data received more complete?– Data elements meet processing requirements?– DEPEND ON ADEQUACY OF EHR CERTIFICATION
• FASTER– Delivered to EVRS faster?– Registration accomplished faster?– Transmitted to NCHS faster?– Certificates available to individuals faster?– Statistics and tools (e.g. death index) available for use faster?– DEPEND ON PROVIDER BEHAVIOR, EVRS SYSTEM CAPABILITY
• CHEAPER– Less labor per record?– Less labor for follow-ups?– Simplified workflow for record completion? – EVRS cheaper to produce, procure, maintain, replace?– DEPEND ON EVRS SYSTEMS LEVERAGING EHR STANDARDS
Source: Seth Foldy, MD, 2013 NAPHSIS Conference
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 17
Tentative Conclusion
• IF certified EHRs capture well-defined data elements using standardized vocabulary, and
• IF EHRs present said data for validation, supplementation, and certification by the health care provider, and
• IF this occurs timely in a clinical-friendly workflow, and• IF EVRS systems build toward ONE clear standard for
receiving and processing this data, • THEN semi-automated EHR reporting could be better,
faster AND cheaper for both clinicians and VR officesSource: Seth Foldy, MD, 2013 NAPHSIS Conference
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 19
OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES IN POPULATION HEALTH IMPROVEMENT
Slide 19
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 20
What’s in a name?
• ‘Population’ and ‘population health’ mean different things to different sectors– Public health: Focus is on all people who live, work
or play within jurisdictional boundaries– ACOs: The population of patients for whom they
are responsible– Healthcare: A patient panel of, for example,
hypertensives or diabetics
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 21
Assumptions
• Regardless of how ACA gets implemented, the focus on improving health outcomes in populations will continue
• Much greater focus on ‘big data’ analytics to better understand social and other determinants of health
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 22
Gartner Hype Cycle for HIT
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 23
Assumptions
• Regardless of how ACA gets implemented, the focus on improving health outcomes in populations will continue
• Much greater focus on ‘big data’ analytics to better understand social and other determinants of health
• Healthcare is unlikely to embark on widespread sharing of chronic disease data with public health
• Access to data and analytic capabilities will be through partnerships
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 24
Key Capacities and Elements of an Informatics-Savvy Health Department
Informatics Vision & Governance
• Well-articulated informatics vision for how the agency uses information and IT
• Organization-wide approach to interoperability
• Effective relationship with community partners and with central IT
• Policies to ensure confidentiality, security, integrity of data
• Training strategies for improving informatics knowledge and skills across a broad range of staff
• Informatics unit with agency-wide responsibilities
Well-designed & effectively used systems
• Information systems effectively meet the information needs, workflows and practices of staff and programs.
• Systems are interoperable with other internal & external systems
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 25
Opportunities for eVital Records Initiative
Get Ready• Develop an informatics-savvy program and workforce• Become familiar with the VR standards• Become familiar with hospital-EHR workflows• Learn from the pilots (MN and UT)• Conduct a readiness assessment of state and local partnersGet Involved• Participate in standards development and testing activities• Contribute to national policy and standards discussionGet Going!• Start an eVital Records Initiative
Adapted from Michelle Williamson, CDC/NCHS
NAPHSIS Annual Meeting 2014 Slide 26NAPHSIS ANNUAL MEETING| Seattle | June 8-11, 2014
VITAL RECORDS: A CULTURE OF QUALITY
Thank YouBill Brand
Public Health Informatics [email protected]