NANPA AnnuAl RepoRt · 2020-05-06 · (NANPA) Annual Report. this annual report covers NANPA...

NANPA AnnuAl RepoRt

2010 NANPA ANNuAl RePoRt | PAge 3

To stakeholders of the North American Numbering Plan Administration

It is with great pleasure that Neustar, Inc. (“Neustar”) presents the 2010 North American Numbering Plan Administration (NANPA) Annual Report. this annual report covers NANPA activities from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010.

the NANPA annual report focuses on the administration of the various numbering resources of the North American Numbering Plan (NANP). As with previous annual reports, it provides a picture of the state of the NANP at the end of 2010. It also provides a useful and comprehensive description of the numerous activities undertaken by NANPA during the year. the data included in this report comes from the NANPA website where you can locate the latest numbering information.

Neustar has served as the NANPA for over twelve years. over this time frame, we have continually focused on NANPA’s core responsibilities of administration of NANP resources, coordination of area code relief planning and the collection of utilization and forecast data from service providers. our experience enables us to completely understand the critical nature of the services that NANPA provides the Federal Communications Commission, state regulatory commissions, the telecommunications industry and the general public. looking forward, we remain committed to providing high quality, neutral, third-party administration of the NANP and maintaining the trust you have placed in us.

Feel free to contact any of the NANPA staff, or me, with any comments, suggestions or concerns. thank you for this opportunity to serve as NANPA.

Sincerely,

John C. Manning Sr. Director, NANPA Neustar, Inc. (Neustar)

| 2010 NANPA ANNuAl RePoRt

tAble oF CoNteNtS

the north American numbering plan ............................ 5

History ...............................................................................5

North American Numbering Plan Administration ..........5

NANPA Funding ................................................................5

NANPA Neutrality .............................................................5

nAnp Administration System ....................................... 6

NAS Central office Code Administration ........................6

Applying online for other Numbering Resources .......... 7

NANP Notification System ............................................... 7

NAS NRuF ......................................................................... 7

NAS Reports ......................................................................8

NAS user Registration ......................................................8

Code Administration ..................................................... 9

overview ............................................................................9

Resource Report – NPA Codes ........................................9

2010 Activities .................................................................10

overlays ...........................................................................12

Dialing Plans ...................................................................12

Resource Report – Central office Codes ......................13

Central office Code Activity ...........................................13

Central office Code Activity (Year over Year) ................14

Central office Code

Administration Quality Measurements .........................15

2010 Activities .................................................................16

Resource Report – 5YY–NXX Codes ..............................17

Resource Report – 9YY–NXX Codes ..............................18

Resource Report – 555 line Numbers ..........................18

Resource Report — Carrier Identification Codes ........18

Fg D CIC Activity ..............................................................19

Fg b CIC Activity ..............................................................20

Resource Report – N11 Codes ....................................... 21

Resource Report – 456-NXX Codes ............................... 21

Resource Report – 800-855 Numbers .......................... 21

Resource Report – Automatic Number

Identification “II” Digits ................................................... 21

Resource Reports – Vertical Service Codes ................. 21

npA Relief planning overview ..................................... 21

Relief Planning Quality Measurements ........................ 21

Customer Survey Feedback ...........................................23

Relief Planning Process .................................................25

numbering Resource utilization and Forecast ........... 26

overview ..........................................................................26

2010 NRuF exhaust Forecasts ......................................27

other nAnpA Services ................................................ 28

AoCN enterprise Service ................................................28

AoCN Quality Measurements ........................................28

entry of Paper Submissions

of Resource Applications ...............................................28

entry of Paper NRuF Submissions ...............................28

NANPA testimony in State Regulatory Hearings .........28

Customized Reports .......................................................28

Financial Results ............................................................29

INC Participation ............................................................29

NANPA Website ...............................................................30

NANPA Newsletters ........................................................ 31

Support for NANP Countries other than the u.S. ......... 31

Support to the FCC,

State Commissions and the NANC ................................ 31

Attachment 1 –

Area Code Inventory ........................................................33

Attachment 2 –

geographic NPAs Sorted by location ...........................34

Attachment 3 –

geographic NPAs Sorted Numerically ..........................39

Attachment 4 –

Non-geographic NPAs in Service ..................................44

Attachment 5 –

Dialing Plans ...................................................................45

Attachment 6 –

2010 NRuF and NPA exhaust Analysis .........................53

Attachment 7 –

2010 NANP exhaust Analysis ....................................... 69

Attachment 8 –

Where to Find Numbering Information ......................... 71

Attachment 9 –

Contacts in the Countries Participating

in the North American Numbering Plan .......................73

Attachment 10 –

list of Acronyms .............................................................77


tHe NoRtH AMeRICAN NuMbeRINg PlAN

HistoryAt&t developed the North American Numbering Plan (NANP) in 1947 to simplify and facilitate direct dialing of long distance calls. NANP telephone numbers are ten-digit numbers consisting of a three-digit Numbering Plan Area (NPA) code, commonly called an area code, followed by a seven-digit local number.

the NANP is an integrated numbering plan serving nineteen North American countries that share its resources. Regulatory authorities in each participating country have plenary authority over numbering resources, but all participating countries, implicitly or explicitly, share numbering resources cooperatively. this approach has been successful for more than sixty years.

north American numbering plan Administration At&t administered shared numbering resources such as area codes until divestiture of the bell System in 1984, when these functions were transferred to bellcore under the Plan of Reorganization. on october 9, 1997, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), acting on a recommendation of the North American Numbering Council (NANC), named lockheed Martin to serve as administrator of the North American Numbering Plan (NANPA). In December of 1999 NANPA was transitioned from lockheed Martin to Neustar. In July 2003, the FCC selected Neustar through a competitive bid to serve as NANPA for another five year term. Neustar presently serves as the NANPA under a new contract with the FCC that continues through July 2011.

Regulatory authorities in various NANP countries have named national administrators to oversee the numbering resources assigned by NANPA for use within their countries. Neustar is the national administrator for the united States (u.S.) and its territories. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) Canada serves as the Canadian Numbering Administrator. In other participating countries, regulatory authorities either serve as the national administrator or delegate the responsibility to the dominant carrier. NANPA, in its overall coordinating role, consults with and provides assistance to those regulatory authorities and national administrators to ensure that numbering resources are used in the best interests of all participants in the NANP.

NANPA is not a policy-making entity. In making assignment decisions, NANPA follows regulatory directives and industry-developed guidelines. the NANC via its Numbering oversight Working group (NoWg) provides continuous oversight of NANPA on behalf of the NANC and evaluates NANPA’s performance each year.

NANPA has three core responsibilities: administration of NANP resources, coordination of area code relief planning and collection of utilization and forecast data from service providers.

nAnpA Fundingthe NANPA function is performed under an FCC contract on a fixed-price basis.

Costs associated with the administration of shared numbering resources are allocated to participating countries based on population and then further adjusted based on NANPA services used by each country. Participants pay only their share of the costs of the NANPA services they require. Regulatory authorities in each participating country determine how to recover these costs.

In the u.S., which pays most of the cost, NANPA is funded by the telecommunications industry under an arrangement specified in FCC rules (47 C.F.R. Section 52.17). telecommunication carriers in the u.S. complete a telecommunications Reporting Worksheet (FCC Form 499-A) which sets out the information needed to calculate the fee. the telecommunication carrier’s end user telecommunications revenue for the prior calendar year is multiplied by a contribution factor to obtain the fee payable. the minimum fee is $25.

nAnpA neutralityIn accordance with FCC regulations, the NANPA shall be a non-governmental entity that is impartial and not aligned with any particular telecommunications industry segment. Accordingly, while conducting its operations, the NANPA may not be an affiliate of any telecommunications service provider(s) as defined in the telecommunications Act of 1996. “Affiliate” is a person who controls, is controlled by, or is under the direct or indirect common control with another person. Further, the NANPA and any affiliate thereof, may not issue a majority of its debt to, nor may it derive a majority of its revenues from, any telecommunications service provider. “Majority” shall mean greater than 50 percent, and “debt” shall mean stocks, bonds, securities, notes, loans, or any other instrument of indebtedness.

Notwithstanding the neutrality criteria set forth above, the NANPA may be determined to be or not to be subject to undue influence by parties with a vested interest in the outcome of numbering administration and activities. the NANC, as a federal advisory committee to the FCC, may conduct an evaluation to determine if the NANPA meets the undue influence criterion.


NANP ADMINIStRAtIoN SYSteM

the NANP Administration System (NAS) provides an automated system for processing number resource applications, collecting resource utilization and forecast data and issuing notifications to the industry on numbering matters. Introduced in 2004, NAS is the primary tool used by federal and state regulators, service providers, service provider consultants and the NANPA in the assignment and administration of the various NANP resources.

At the end of 2010, there were 1,450 registered NAS users. over 1,300 users were service providers or their consultants. Sixty of the users represented federal and state regulatory users. Along with the NAS registered users, there were 2,800 mailing list participants. Mailing list participants receive NANP notifications but do not have access to NAS.

In 2010, NANPA deployed two new NAS database servers, replacing existing equipment purchased in August 2003. In addition, NANPA upgraded the operating software and application software used on all NAS servers, ensuring the system was using current versions of all required software. Finally, working in cooperation with the FCC, NANPA secured NAS hardware and software annual maintenance agreements set to expire during the second half of 2010.

Seven NAS trouble tickets were opened in 2010. two of these tickets involved issues associated with Numbering Resource utilization/Forecast (NRuF) reporting capabilities and the proper display of information. one issue was related to the delivery of system-generated emails. A separate issue involved the functionality associated with a uRl contained within a NANP Notification System (NNS) notice. one trouble ticket was directly attributable to the NAS software upgrade that took place in November 2010. Finally, a report available on the NANPA public website failed to include all required data when downloaded into an exceltM file. For the remaining ticket, it was determined the user was unable to submit secure FtP (File transfer Protocol) files to NANPA due to an issue within the user’s corporate network. All tickets were closed in 2010 with one exception being the issue involving the uRl in the NNS notice.

below is a discussion of the NAS functionality and how the system supports the assignment and administration of NANP resources.

nAS Central office Code Administration NAS mechanizes central office (Co) code administration by processing the following code requests: Part 1 (Central office Code Assignment Request form), Months to exhaust Worksheet (required when requesting additional central office codes in a rate center) and Part 4/Part 4-PA (Confirmation of Code In-Service forms). NAS issues a Part 3 (Central office Code Administrator’s Response/Confirmation form) and a Part 5 Form, used to confirm NANPA’s receipt of a Part 4. NAS allows users to complete and submit these forms on-line, as well as stores and processes these forms.

NAS auto-populates specific fields within applications with information contained in the user’s profile and provides drop-down menus for certain data required on the different forms such as operating Company Numbers (oCNs), NPAs and rate center information. System checks ensure that all required fields are populated and that the information supplied is valid prior to submission. Supporting documentation associated with an application is provided to NANPA via fax or email. Such documentation includes evidence of certification and network readiness for initial code applications, evidence of safety valve waiver approvals and documentation necessary for expedited code activations, modifications and disconnects.

once NAS validates the application content and accepts it for processing, the applicant receives confirmation via a tracking number, indicating that the code request was successfully submitted. NAS will also permit code applicants to search for previously-submitted forms.

NAS also supports an interface with the Pooling Administration System (PAS). this interface permits the service provider to submit the information needed for a central office code request (i.e., Part 1) in a pooling rate center into PAS. PAS forwards this data to NANPA via the NAS/PAS interface. this process includes the submission of the appropriate Months-to-exhaust Form required with any central office code growth request. once received by NAS, the Part 1 request appears in the work item list of the NANPA Code Administrator. When the Code Administrator processes the central office code application, NAS emails the Part 3 Administrator’s Response/Confirmation to the applicant and the Pooling Administrator (PA) as well as sends it via the NAS/PAS interface to PAS. the Part 4 and Part 4A (submitted by the Pooling Administrator) are also sent via the interface.



Applying on-line for other numbering ResourcesNAS allows on-line application submissions not only for central office codes, but also for other NANP resources such as Carrier Identification Codes (CICs), 5YY–NXX codes, 9YY–NXX codes, NPA 456–NXX codes, NPAs, 800–855 line numbers and 555 line numbers. In addition, NAS provides real-time reports on the assignment status of these numbering resources. these reports are accessible through the ‘Reports’ section of the NANPA website.

In 2010, NPA 544 was identified as the next 5YY NPA to relieve the 500 and 533 NPAs. As a result, NAS was modified to accept NXX code applications for the 544 NPA and provide reports on 500–NXX, 533–NXX and 544–NXX assignments.

nAnp notification Systemthe NANP Notification System (NNS) provides a vehicle for NANPA to issue notifications when significant events occur. Notifications fall under two categories: geographic and Non-geographic Notifications. geographic Notifications are those issued for documents that have been generated for specific states and/or NPAs. Non-geographic Notifications are those that relate to the entire NANP and are not related to a specific state or NPA.

Geographic notifications available to the public:• New processes and changes in central office code

administration that affect specific states and/or NPAs;

• NPAs going into or out of jeopardy status or other changes to the jeopardy status of an NPA;

• Announcements by state regulators of changes that affect NANP processing; and

• Data related to the status of resources associated with state conservation deliberations.

non-geographic notifications available to the public:• Changes in Industry Numbering Committee (INC)

administration guidelines;

• updates on the NRuF Form 502 and associated job aids, as well as procedural changes (such as the introduction of new data fields);

• Changes to NANPA processes that will affect customers;

• NANPA Planning letters and quarterly Newsletters;

• International activities impacting the NANP and NANP Administration;

• New and/or revised NPA and NANP exhaust projections;

• Scheduled system maintenance and system availability issues; and

• Client education, new forms and tools.

In addition to sending notices, NAS also has the capability to include attachments to the notices, allowing NANPA to send certain documentation (e.g., quarterly NANPA Newsletters) directly to users. NAS also permits users to search for specific notices based upon a particular time period. Notifications concerning NPA relief planning activity remain limited to only the service provider industry and appropriate regulatory agencies.

NANPA distributed 137 notifications in 2010. the chart below illustrates the quantity of notifications distributed by category. All notifications are retained in NAS.

notification Category number of notifications

npA Relief planning 64

planning letters 19

other non-Geographic 17

Code Administration 14

InC Guidelines 9

nRuF 8

newsletters 4

Jeopardy 2

other Geographic 0

total 137

nAS nRuF NRuF reporting is a semi-annual process whereby service providers submit utilization and forecast information to NANPA for use in the development of NPA and NANP exhaust projections. NANPA collects and stores this information and provides it to the FCC and state commissions. Service providers are required to report by February 1 and August 1 of each year. Service providers may submit updates and corrections to their submissions at any time during the current reporting cycle.

NAS permits service providers to submit their utilization and forecast data via email (i.e., exceltM spreadsheet), electronic File transfer (eFt) using secure FtP, compact disk (CD) and on-line. With the on-line method, service providers log into NAS and enter the data requested in the various worksheets contained in the NRuF Form 502. In addition, as many service providers have the need to submit NRuF data between reporting cycles, NAS permits service providers to update or modify previously-submitted utilization and forecast data for the current



reporting cycle. this on-line capability is also used for reporting utilization and forecast data for the non-geographic 5YY and 9YY NPAs.

In November 2010, NANPA implemented Change order 18, which required NANPA to compare thousands-block (NPA–NXX–X) assignment data obtained from the Pooling Administrator with the utilization data collected from service providers during the semi-annual NRuF reporting process. through this comparison, NAS identifies assigned thousands-blocks for which no utilization data was provided, allowing NANPA to contact the service provider to which the thousands-block is assigned and request that it submit appropriate utilization information. NAS also identifies those instances where a service provider indicates on their NRuF submission that a specific thousands-block was donated to the PA but the PA assignment data shows the thousands-block is assigned to the service provider.

the following enhancements were implemented applicable to NANPA Change order 18. these enhancements impact all NAS registrants with NRuF as a resource subscription.

• the utilization Missing Report under NRuF Reports was enhanced to display thousands-blocks (NPA–NXX–Xs) as well as central office codes (NPA–NXXs) for which NRuF utilization was not reported for the applicable NRuF cycle.

• the new Donation Discrepancy Report under NRuF Reports identifies a specific thousands-block that is marked as “donated” on the NRuF submission but is shown as assigned in the PA assignment data to the same oCN that indicated the thousands-block was donated.

Central office code and thousands-block assignments as of the last day of the NRuF cycle (June 30 for the NRuF due August 1 or December 31 for the NRuF due February 1) are used in creating the utilization Missing Report and Donation Discrepancy Report.

nAS ReportsNAS provides a number of real-time reports concerning NANP resource assignment and availability, including central office codes, CICs, 5YY NXXs, 9YY NXXs and 555 line numbers. these reports are available on the NANPA website.

In addition to resource availability, NAS permits both service providers and regulators access to numerous NRuF queries and reports. Information provided in

these queries is driven by the user’s NAS profile. Service providers only have access to their own information, while state regulators have access to utilization and forecast data for the area codes in their respective states.

nAS user RegistrationAll users of NAS are required to register in the system. the user registration process allows a user to select from a variety of resource subscriptions depending on the user’s needs.

there are different types of users of NAS, including u.S. service providers, non-u.S. service providers, consultants authorized to request numbering resources on behalf of a service provider, federal and state regulators and other individuals or entities with a valid interest in number administration matters. For each user type, specific NAS capabilities are available for use. these capabilities include the ability to 1) submit requests for central office codes (Central office Code Administration), 2) access NRuF capabilities, 3) register for various geographic and non-geographic notifications, 4) submit applications for other NANP resources such as CICs, 5YY NXXs, 9YY NXXs, 456 NXXs, 800–855 line numbers and 555 line numbers and 5) submit Part 4 In-Service Confirmation forms (reclamation).

All registration requests are reviewed and validated prior to approval. once NANPA approves the registration request, the user is issued a password. once registered in NAS, the user is able to update and modify their profile.

NAS has been engineered with numerous security features. NAS has specified time intervals a user must log into the system after their profile has been approved or system access will be denied. users are required to update their NAS passwords every 180 days. Anytime a user contacts NANPA to re-enable their profile, the user will receive a new password that must be reset by the user within 14 calendar days of when the profile was enabled. If an existing NAS user fails to reset the password, the NAS profile will be suspended. NAS will continue to send NNS notices to the user whose profile is suspended, but no other NAS-generated work item-related emails will be sent to the user. Nor will the user have access to NAS. the user will receive weekly reminders to contact NANPA to reset the NAS password. If the user fails to contact NANPA within 90 days of the date the NAS account is suspended, the profile will automatically be disabled and the user will cease to receive NNS notices.


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

overviewCode administration includes receiving and processing applications for assignment, making and recording assignments, reclaiming resources that are not placed into service, updating information associated with assigned resources and keeping the industry informed as the supply of available resources approaches exhaust. the scope of code administration includes these numbering resources:

• Numbering plan area (NPA) codes (area codes);

• Central office (NXX) codes;

• PCS 5YY codes;

• 9YY–NXX codes;

• N11 codes;

• 555–XXXX line numbers;

• Carrier identification codes (CICs);

• International inbound NPA 456–NXX codes;

• 800–855–XXXX line numbers;

• ANI II digits (Automatic Number Identification Information Integers); and

• Vertical service codes.

Subsequent sections of this report discuss each of these resources in greater detail.

Resource Report – npA CodesContact: John Manning, 571–434–5770

NPA codes, often called “area codes,” are the first three digits of the 10-digit NANP telephone number. NPA codes are in NXX format, where N is any digit from 2 through 9 and X is any digit from 0 through 9. Attachment 1 to this annual report provides an inventory of NPA codes.

Most NPA codes designate specific geographic areas; for example, NPA 406 serves Montana and NPA 843 covers a portion of South Carolina. NPA codes used in this manner are called geographic NPA codes. As of December 31, 2010, 341 geographic NPA codes were in service. of these, 293 serve the u.S. and its territories, 29 serve Canada, and the remaining 19 serve bermuda and the Caribbean countries participating in the North American Numbering Plan. Attachments 2 and 3 to this annual report are tables of geographic NPA codes currently in use, sorted by location and numerically.

other NPA codes designate special services such as toll-free calling rather than geographic areas. these codes are called non-geographic NPA codes. Normally, NPA codes ending in a repeating digit, called “easily recognizable

codes,” are used to identify toll-free or other special services. Currently 13 such codes are in use. two new non-geographic NPA codes went into service in 2010. NPA 855 was put into service in relief of the toll free area codes and NPA 544 in relief of the PCS 5YY NPAs. Attachment 4 lists the non-geographic NPA codes currently in service.

Introduction of a new geographic NPA code follows a plan and schedule approved by regulatory authorities. the plan is summarized in one or more planning letters on the NANPA website. once an NPA code is assigned for a geographic area or special service, an implementation period follows. the most visible implementation activities include preparing the network to accept the new NPA code, introducing any required changes to the dialing plan and informing the public about how the new code is to be used. the new code is said to be “in service” when it becomes generally dialable.


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

2010 Activitieseight (8) new NPA codes were introduced in 2010, as shown in the table below.

table 1: npAs introduced in 2010

npA Date In Service location overlay? parent npA planning letter number(s) npA overlay Complex

458 2/10/10 oregon Yes 541 383 541/458

470 2/26/10 georgia Yes 678 269 404/770/678/470*

343 5/17/10 ontario, Canada Yes 613 386 613/343

938 7/10/10 Alabama Yes 256 389 256/938

534 8/14/10 Wisconsin Yes 715 384 715/534

579 8/21/10 Quebec, Canada Yes 450 401 395 450/579

855 10/09/10 Non-geographic Yes 800 412 407R1 197 800/888/877/866/855

544 12/15/10 Non-geographic Yes 500 416 411 406 500/533/544

*NPAs 404 and 770 do not overlay each other.

Seven (7) new NPAs were assigned this past year. NPA 539 was assigned as the relief area code for the oklahoma NPA 918. NPA 929 was assigned to relieve the New York 347/718 NPA complex. NPA 873 was assigned to relieve NPA 819 in Quebec, Canada. NPA 365 was assigned to relieve the NPA 289/905 overlay complex in ontario, Canada. NPA 272 was assigned to relieve NPA 570 in Pennsylvania. NPA 431 was assigned as the relief area code for the Manitoba, Canada 204 NPA. And finally, NPA 582 was assigned to relieve the Pennsylvania 814 NPA.

two area codes previously assigned to relieve existing geographic area codes were returned to the NPA inventory. In both instances, implementation of NPA relief was dismissed by the state regulatory authority. As such, these area codes will be retained as reserved, future NPAs unless otherwise directed by the appropriate state commission.

As of December 31, 2010, 37 previously-assigned NPA codes remained to be introduced, as shown in table 2. the “status” column provides the key to understanding the table. A status of “pending” indicates that the regulatory authority has yet to determine an in-service date for the new code. typically this means that the new NPA will not be introduced until additional numbers are needed. A status of “suspended” indicates that the regulatory authority has placed the plan for introducing the new code on hold and that the plan may be canceled or revised in the future. “Scheduled” means a specific in-service date has been identified for the new NPA.


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

table 2: npAs planned but not yet introduced

new npA location Country Anticipated In Service Date

parent npA Status planning letter number(s)

227 Maryland uS 301/240 Pending

249 ontario Canada 3/19/2011 705 Scheduled 414 398R1

272 Pennsylvania uS 570 Pending 409

274 Wisconsin uS 2/22/2014 920 Scheduled 417 385

283 ohio uS 513 Suspended 316 286 264

327 Arkansas uS 5/18/2013 870 Scheduled 400

365 ontario Canada 3/25/2013 289/905 Scheduled

369 California uS 707 Suspended 238 210

380 ohio uS 614 Suspended 317 297 290

431 Manitoba Canada 11/03/2012 204 Scheduled

447 Illinois uS 217 Pending

464 Illinois uS 708 Pending 195

531 Nebraska uS 3/26/2011 402 Scheduled 410 397 393

539 oklahoma uS 4/01/2011 918 Scheduled 403

557 Missouri uS 314 Suspended 303 279 261

564 Washington uS 206, 253, 360, 425 Suspended 298 239 196

582 Pennsylvania uS 814 Pending



659 Alabama uS 205 Pending 289 284

667 Maryland uS 410/443 Pending 299 266


679 Michigan uS 313 Pending 227 209

689 Florida uS 407 Suspended 325 323

721 Sint Maarten Sint Maarten Pending 404 396

730 Illinois uS 618 Pending

737 texas uS 512 Suspended 276 233


822 NANP area 800 Pending 214



873 Quebec Canada 6/01/2013 819 Scheduled 405

929 New York uS 4/16/2011 347/718 Scheduled 402


959 Connecticut uS 860 Pending 255 217

975 Missouri uS 816 Suspended 304 280 262

984 North Carolina uS 919 Pending 306 271


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

overlaysIn an overlay, two or more NPA codes serve all or part of the same geographic area. the term “overlay complex” describes the list of NPA codes included in the overlay. All of the overlays in service today are full-service overlays; that is, numbers in the overlay NPA code(s) are not restricted to any specific service or services. Six (6) new overlays were introduced in 2010. listed in table 3 are the overlay complexes in service as of December 31, 2010.

table 3: npA overlays

location overlay Complex

Alabama 256–938*

Alberta 403–780–587

British Columbia 250–604–778

California 310–424




Colorado 303–720

Connecticut 203–475

Dominican Republic 809–829–849

Florida 305–786

Florida 407–321

Florida 954–754

Georgia 404–770–678–470*

Georgia 706–762

Illinois 312–773–872

Illinois 630–331

Illinois 815–779

Illinois 847–224

Maryland 301–240

Maryland 410–443

Massachusetts 508–774




Michigan 248–947

Mississippi 601–769

new Jersey 201–551



new York 212–646–917

new York 718–347–917

north Carolina 704–980

ohio 330–234

ohio 419–567

ontario 613–343*

ontario 416–647

ontario 519–226

ontario 905–289

oregon 503–971

oregon 541–458*

pennsylvania 215–267

pennsylvania 412–724–878

pennsylvania 610–484

puerto Rico 787–939

Quebec 418–581

Quebec 450–579*

Quebec 514–438

texas 214–469–972

texas 713–281–832

texas 817–682

texas 903–430

utah 801–385

Virginia 703–571

West Virginia 304–681

Wisconsin 715–534*

*NPAs 404 and 770 do not overlay each other.

Dialing planseach NPA has a basic dialing plan, which indicates the dialing pattern to be used for various types of calls originating in that NPA. In the u.S., dialing plans vary from state to state and from NPA to NPA. basic dialing plans for u.S. NPAs are listed in Attachment 5 to this annual report.

Key variables in determining a dialing pattern are 1) whether or not the call originates and terminates within the same NPA, 2) whether the call is a local or toll call and 3) whether the call requires special handling (e.g., credit card, third-party billing, or operator assistance). Dialing patterns in the u.S. have been largely standardized. local calls originating and terminating within the same NPA are usually dialed on a seven-digit basis, omitting the NPA code, except in overlay areas where the NPA code must be


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

dialed. toll calls originating in one NPA and terminating in another are usually dialed with a prefix “1” followed by the ten-digit number. Special handling calls are always dialed with a prefix “0” followed by the ten-digit number.

Most of the variations in basic dialing plans involve toll calls originating and terminating within the same NPA (home NPA toll calls) and local calls originating in one NPA and terminating in another NPA (foreign NPA local calls). In states where the prefix “1” is considered to be a toll indicator, home NPA toll calls are usually dialed as “1” followed by the ten-digit number, and foreign NPA local calls are dialed using the ten-digit number without a prefix. In states where the prefix “1” is used to indicate that a ten-digit number will follow, home NPA toll calls are dialed using just the seven-digit number and foreign NPA local calls are dialed as “1” followed by the ten-digit number.

Dialing patterns within an NPA also may vary according to service provider capabilities. In addition, in many areas where NPA boundaries split local calling areas, state regulatory commissions and service provider tariffs allow seven-digit dialing across NPA boundaries, including across state lines.

Resource Report – Central office CodesContact: beth Sprague, 571–434–5513

Central office (Co) codes, also known as prefixes, exchanges, or NXX codes, are digits 4 through 6 of the 10-digit telephone number. the following discussion addresses central office codes within geographic area codes.

NANPA administers all geographic central office codes in the u.S. and its territories. the Canadian Numbering Administrator performs this function in Canada. In the remaining NANP countries, regulatory authorities are playing an increasingly active role in central office code administration as competition emerges in these countries. Contact information for regulatory and administrative personnel can be found in Attachment 9 to this annual report.

Service providers obtain numbers for their customers by applying for and receiving central office code assignments. each central office code contains 10,000 numbers, for use in the area the code serves. Central office code requests also come through the Pooling Administrator for 1) the assignment of a location Routing Number (lRN), 2) replenishing the supply of available thousands-blocks or 3) the dedication to a

single customer. NANPA tracks over 145,000 assigned central office codes in the u.S. and its territories. NANPA processed over 12,000 requests in 2010 (same as in 2009) for central office code assignments, code returns or changes to existing assignments.

the FCC, in its Number Resource optimization (NRo) order series, established detailed criteria for the assignment of initial and growth central office codes in the u.S. and its territories. the process of applying for a central office code assignment based on FCC rules and regulations is specified in guidelines developed by the industry. the latest version of the guidelines can be found at the Alliance for telecommunications Industry Solutions (AtIS) website at http://www.atis.org/inc/incguides.asp.

Central office Code Activity Central office (Co) code monthly application and assignment activities during 2010 are shown in table 4.

the rows in the table should be interpreted as follows:

Assignments – Applications that resulted in the assignment of a new central office code.

Changes – Applications that resulted in a change to the information associated with a code assignment, for example, the oCN or switch.

Denials – Applications not meeting the criteria for assignment as prescribed by the FCC and embodied in the central office code assignment guidelines.

Cancellations – Applications canceled or withdrawn by the applicant. these applications are not counted in the total quantity of applications processed.

Canceled Disconnects – Applications requesting the return (disconnect) of an assigned code that were canceled after NANPA issued the Part 3 approving the return.

Disconnects – Applications requesting the return (disconnect) of an assigned code.

Reservations – Applications requesting and receiving a code reservation.

total processed – total quantity of applications processed by NANPA.

pooling pass-thru – Applications processed by NANPA that came through the Pooling Administrator.


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

table 4: 2010 Monthly Co Code Activity

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep oct nov Dec total

Assignments 250 277 352 138 162 278 220 209 247 254 234 174 2,795

Changes 220 568 563 1,194 563 1,440 542 1,021 711 375 576 430 8,203

Denials 98 75 112 52 46 56 18 79 41 37 75 103 792

Cancellations (note 1) 23 25 48 12 10 29 8 12 23 13 41 20 264

Canceled Disconnects (note 1)

0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 3

Disconnects 16 44 20 17 18 32 24 30 23 37 22 27 310

Reservations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

total processed 584 964 1,047 1,401 789 1,806 804 1,339 1,022 703 907 734 12,100

pooling pass-thru 359 559 655 617 314 1,153 475 660 679 495 481 489 6,936

Note 1 – Applications that are canceled are not included in the total quantity of applications processed.

While the total quantity of applications processed in 2010 (12,100) was the same as in 2009, the number of Co code assignments was up by over 600 codes. Further, the quantity of code change requests as well as denied applications in 2010 was roughly the same as in 2009. For 2010, the quantity of code disconnects (310) continued to decrease year over year (534 in 2009 and 784 in 2008).

beginning in late 2004, NANPA was directed by the FCC to assist in certain aspects of the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996. Specifically, NANPA was directed to withhold assignment of numbering resources to an entity identified by the FCC as delinquent in their payments to the Commission. In 2010, no central office code assignment requests were denied by NANPA in compliance with this requirement.

Central office Code Activity (Year over Year)NANPA also tracks year over year assignment data to identify any trends in Co code assignment rates. table 5 shows the total quantity of Co codes assigned over the last ten years. Also included is the net demand for the year, reflecting the total number of codes assigned less the number of codes returned.

table 5: Year over Year Co Code Assignments

Year Annual Gross Co Code Demand

Annual net Co Code Demand

2001 10,398 4,304

2002 7,178 3,574

2003 3,245 1,457

2004 3,128 2,144

2005 3,312 2,307

2006 4,079 3,413

2007 3,216 2,467

2008 2,946 2,162

2009 2,144 1,610

2010 2,795 2,484


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

table 6: 2010 Co Code Administration Quality Results

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep oct nov Dec

percent of central office code applications processed in 7 calendar days

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Number of applications exceeding 7 calendar days

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Average days late for applications exceeding 7 calendar days

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

percent of central office codes assigned without code reject or conflict

99.6% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

A. Co code rejects (Note 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

b. Co code conflicts 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

percent of administrator phone calls returned by end of next business day

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

total number of administrator calls

71 72 72 70 58 53 48 50 48 70 60 55

Average days late for phone calls returned late

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Note 1 – In 2009, a code exchange initiated by a service provider was removed from this measurement.

Central office Code Administration Quality Measurements Central office code administration quality results for 2010 are summarized in table 6. A detailed description of the quality measurements follows.

the table shows three primary measurements:

Application processing – NANPA is required to process central office code applications within seven (7) calendar days. the table shows the percentage of applications processed within 7 calendar days, the number of applications exceeding the 7 calendar day period and, for those applications requiring more than 7 calendar days, the “average number of days late.” the results in the table show uniform, high quality processing.

Codes assigned without a code conflict or reject – A ‘Code Conflict’ occurs when a code assigned by NANPA cannot be placed into service due to a dialing conflict. A ‘Code Reject’ occurs when a code assigned by NANPA must be replaced because the code originally assigned cannot be placed into service.

telephone calls – Code Administrators are required to return telephone calls by no later than the end of the next business day. the table shows the percentage of telephone calls returned during the required period along with the “average days late” for calls returned outside of the required period.


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

2010 Activitiesbelow is a summary of central office code administration activities in 2010.

Avoiding potential Code Conflicts – In February, NAS was updated to make all NPAs within a state shown as

‘available’ for assignment as a central office code in other NPAs within the state ‘unavailable’ for assignment. this modification was made to avoid potential code conflicts resulting from 7-digit dialing arrangements. over 1,500 NPA–NXXs were made unavailable for assignment.

Rate Center Changes – throughout 2010, NANPA distributed numerous notices concerning rate center additions/consolidations/changes. States involved in these activities included Nebraska, oregon, Florida, North Carolina, South Dakota, utah, Florida and Washington.

Assignment of Co Codes for lRns – NANPA assisted numerous service providers and state regulators in the transfer of a central office code from one service provider to another service provider in need of a code for a location Routing Number (lRN). this effort included NANPA identifying individual codes with low utilization that did not serve as an lRN (as well as meeting the other conditions described in the Central office Code (NXX) Assignment guidelines, AtIS–0300051) and coordinating between the involved service providers in transferring the identified code. through this effort, the assignment of a Co code is avoided, thus delaying the exhaust of an area code.

Managing Jeopardies – When the supply of codes in a particular NPA is at risk of exhausting before a new area code or other relief measure can be introduced, NANPA declares “jeopardy” in that NPA. When jeopardy is declared, code allocations are initially set at 3 codes per month. the industry, with the assistance of NANPA Code Administration and NPA Relief Planning, develops local industry jeopardy procedure options at a meeting convened by NANPA. once determined, local jeopardy procedures are posted on the NANPA website, www.nanpa.com.

At the end of 2010, 17 NPAs were in jeopardy. Four area codes were removed from the list of jeopardy NPAs as NPA relief was implemented or circumstances changed such that jeopardy was rescinded.

Reclamation – each central office code assignment has an associated “effective date” when the code will be placed in service. the assignment guidelines require that the code be placed in service no later than six months

after the original effective date. the assignee confirms that the code is in service by submitting a Part 4 to NANPA. NANPA responds to the code applicant by sending the

“Administrator’s Response – Receipt of the Part 4.” If a Part 4 has not been received by NANPA during the first five months following the original effective date, NANPA will send a reminder notice to the code assignee.

NANPA tracks code assignment effective dates and, if the Part 4 is not received within the six-month period following the effective date, the code is considered to be delinquent and NANPA notifies the appropriate regulatory authority. the FCC NRo orders delegated authority to the states to determine whether or not delinquent codes should be reclaimed. the FCC makes reclamation decisions for those states that decided not to participate in the process. the NANPA website provides detailed information about the reclamation process, including contact information for each participating state and the FCC.

to measure reclamation effectiveness, NANPA monitors the percentage of delinquent codes on which it begins the reclamation process, along with the number of codes recovered each month. the recovery of a code must be directed by the appropriate regulatory authority. NANPA also monitors the reclamation lists provided to the states/FCC to ensure there are no errors or discrepancies. table 7 reflects the reclamation activity in 2010.


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

table 7: 2010 Co Code Reclamation Quality Results


percentage of applicable codes on which reclamation was initiated

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Number of codes for which a Part 4 was not rec’d 180 days after NANPA effective date (Note 1)

21 24 43 13 9 15 21 12 9 38 72 26

Number of codes on which reclamation started late

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Codes recovered (Note 2) 0 1 0 5 3 2 1 0 0 2 0 0

Number of Reclamation Discrepancies Reported by State Commission(s) Regarding Monthly Reclamation list

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

Note 1: Quantity of codes for which NANPA did not receive a Part 4 in service confirmation 180 days after the original effective date.

Note 2: This measurement shows the number of codes recovered through the reclamation process (the state or FCC directed NANPA to reclaim the code).

Resource Report – 5YY–nXX Codes Contact: Nancy Fears, 830–632–5979

NANPA assigns 5YY–NXX codes to carriers that provide personal communications service (PCS) to customers. the assignment guidelines, which may be downloaded from the AtIS website (http://www.atis.org/inc/incguides.asp), define personal communications service as:

…a set of capabilities that allows some combination of personal mobility, terminal mobility, and service profile management. It enables each personal communication service user to participate in a user-defined set of subscribed services, and to initiate and/or receive calls on the basis of some combination of a personal number, terminal number, and a service profile across multiple networks at any terminal, fixed or mobile, irrespective of geographic location. Service is limited only by terminal and network capabilities and restrictions imposed by the personal communication service provider.

It should be noted that the 5YY resource is not portable; the NXX identifies the service provider.

there were two 5YY NPAs in-service for most of 2010: NPAs 500 and 533. In December 2010, with the exhaust of the 500 and 533 resources, NANPA initiated the assignment of NXX codes from the 544 NPA.

During 2010, NANPA assigned 717 new 5YY–NXX codes (yielding an average assignment rate of nearly 60 codes per month). When compared with the total assignments in 2009 (260 codes), the quantity of assignments in 2010 represents a 175% increase in the number of 5YY–NXX assignments.

At the end of 2010, a total of 1,605 NXX codes were assigned. No 5YY–NXX codes were reclaimed/returned in 2010 and 768 codes remained available for assignment (all 544–NXXs). twenty-seven 5YY–NXX codes are not available for assignment (5YY–555 and all 5YY–N11). based on NRuF forecast data and assignment information, NANPA projects the need for multiple 5YY NXXs over the next few years.

In 2010, NANPA issued three planning letters addressing the status of the 5YY resource and its projected exhaust time frame as well as announcing the initiation of 544–NXX assignments.


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

NANPA continues to provide information concerning assignments, updates and reclamations for inclusion in the telcordiatM leRgtM Routing guide. NANPA also solicits trouble reporting contact information for 5YY–NXX assignments and forwards the information to the Next generation Interconnection Interoperability Forum (NgIIF) as required.

Resource Report – 9YY–nXX CodesContact: Nancy Fears, 830–632–5979

9YY numbers are used for premium services, with the cost of each 9YY call billed to the calling party. NANPA assigns these numbers according to industry-developed assignment guidelines that may be found on the AtIS website at http://www.atis.org/inc/incguides.asp.

During 2010, there were eight (8) new 900–NXX assignments and no codes were reclaimed/returned.

Forty-seven (47) 900–NXX codes were not available for assignment as of December 31, 2010. these include 900–N11 (8) and 39 codes reserved for Canadian use.

At the end of 2010, a total of 123 900–NXX assignments were in effect. the number of 900–NXX codes available for assignment was 630. With the quantity of available 900 NXX codes, exhaust of the 900 NPA is not an issue at this time.

NANPA continues to provide information about assignments, updates and reclamations for inclusion in the leRg Routing guide. NANPA also solicits trouble reporting contact information for 900–NXX assignments and forwards the information to the NgIIF as required.

Resource Report – 555 line numbers Contact: Nancy Fears, 830–632–5979

the intended use for 555 line numbers, in the format 555–XXXX, where X is any digit from 0 through 9, includes the provisioning of information services, but may grow to include a broad range of existing and future services as well. Assignment of 555 line numbers began in August 1994. NANPA assigns these numbers according to industry-developed assignment guidelines that may be found on the AtIS website at http://www.atis.org/inc/incguides.asp.

During 2010, there were 27 new 555 national line numbers assigned by NANPA and 8 national line number assignments were reclaimed.

At the end of 2010, a total of 7,600 national assignments and 386 non-national line number assignments (291

actual line numbers, assigned to one or more assignees in one or more NPAs) were in effect. In addition, 116 line numbers remain in “dispute” status and 100 line numbers are reserved for the entertainment/advertising industries. At year end, 1,893 555 line numbers were available for assignment.

As of the end of 2010, seventeen (17) 555 line number assignments have been identified by NANPA as

“abandoned” (555 line numbers assigned to individuals or companies whose telephone and fax numbers are no longer in service and letters sent via courier service to these individuals or companies were returned to NANPA as undeliverable).

the current assignment trend indicates no concern for the exhaust of the 555 resource.

Resource Report – Carrier Identification Codes Contact: Nancy Fears, 830–632–5979

Carrier Identification Codes (CICs) are four-digit codes used to route and bill telephone traffic. typically, an entity acquires a CIC assignment by purchasing Feature group b (Fg b) or Feature group D (Fg D) access from an access service provider. NANPA also assigns Fg D CICs to

“switchless resellers” without the requirement to purchase direct Fg D trunk access before applying for a CIC.

In 2006, changes to the Carrier Identification Code (CIC) Assignment guidelines, AtIS-0300050, allowed billing and collection clearinghouses (“bC clearinghouses”) to obtain Fg D and “matching” Fg b CICs without the requirement to purchase direct access. A “bC clearinghouse” is only allowed to apply for a CIC under circumstances when the use of an AbeC (Alternate billing exchange Code) is not permitted as an identifier and/or when the use of an AbeC has been determined as technically non-feasible.

In the u.S., all applicants apply to NANPA directly for CIC assignments (via NAS). If the applicant is a long distance carrier, the access provider must separately provide NANPA with a copy of the Access Service Request (ASR) to verify that Fg D trunk access has been ordered. If the CIC applicant is a local exchange Carrier (leC), incumbent leC (IleC) or competitive leC (CleC), a copy of the authorization from a state regulatory commission granting the applicant authority must separately be provided to NANPA in support of their CIC application. If the applicant is a switchless reseller, it must separately provide NANPA with documentation that validates

“switchless reseller” status. State regulatory commission certification is required unless the state does not issue switchless reseller certification. If the state does not issue


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

such certification, a written statement by an officer of the applicant company will be accepted to verify “switchless reseller” status. In Canada, companies apply for CICs to the Canadian Numbering Administrator (CNA), who verifies that Canadian regulatory requirements have been met. the CNA then submits the application to NANPA via NAS on behalf of the applicant.

Industry-consensus guidelines for the administration of CICs may be found on the AtIS website at http://www.atis.org/inc/incguides.asp. the assignment guidelines encourage leCs providing Fg b and/or Fg D access service, particularly leCs with more than 30 CICs programmed in their switches, to submit Access Provider semi-annual CIC access/usage reports to NANPA for analysis.

Information contained in these reports serves as the basis for NANPA’s reclamation of CICs in an ongoing effort to avoid exhaust of the resource. If no access provider reports access/usage for a given CIC, NANPA initiates reclamation procedures. All CIC assignees, including switchless resellers and “bC clearinghouses”, are expected to submit semi-annual entity Access/usage reports to NANPA. these reports demonstrate whether access or usage has been established as well as document that assigned CICs are being used in accordance with the CIC Assignment guidelines. to initiate reclamation, a letter (sent via certified mail or by courier service for delivery verification purposes) advises the assignee of record that trunk access/usage must be established with an access provider within 60 days from the date of the letter, or, alternatively, the assignee of record must have the access service provider supply NANPA with verification that trunk access/usage was previously established (this allows a reporting error to be detected before reclamation of a CIC is finalized). At the end of the 60-day period, if the requisite information regarding trunk access/usage has not been provided, the CIC is reclaimed. In some cases, the Post office or courier service returns NANPA’s reclamation letter as

“undeliverable.” In these cases, NANPA advises the Industry Numbering Committee (INC) of the inability to contact the assignee, that no trunk access/usage is being reported and that the CIC will be reclaimed and made available for reassignment following the idle period required by the guidelines (12 months), unless the INC directs otherwise.

Maintaining accurate assignment records and entity contact information is an ongoing challenge for NANPA due to abandoned CICs and the high volume of mergers, acquisitions, asset purchases and bankruptcies that

occur in the telecommunications industry. obtaining documentation on and verification of these activities is often difficult, but crucial to the integrity of information contained in the CIC assignment databases.

FG D CIC Activity During 2010, NANPA assigned 54 new Fg D CICs, yielding an average assignment rate of 4.5 codes per month. uS/Canadian switchless resellers received 12 of these assignments. Just as important, NANPA continued its concerted effort in 2010 to investigate and reclaim Fg D CICs that were “abandoned” (assigned to companies no longer in business and/or not in service). our efforts resulted in the return/reclamation of 61 Fg D CICs.

223 codes from the entire Fg D CIC resource are not available for assignment. these include CICs 9000–9199, which are available to all carriers for intranetwork use only. Also included are CICs 0000 and 5000, used exclusively for testing, 0911 and twenty CICs in the formats X411 and 411X, which have been marked unassignable at the direction of the FCC.

At the end of 2010, 2,015 Fg D CICs were assigned in total, leaving 7,762 Fg D CICs available for assignment. based on the 2010 average monthly assignment rate, the projected exhaust for the Fg D CIC resource is over 100 years. It should be noted that reclaimed/returned Fg D CIC assignments are not factored into this projection and that this projection is based on current circumstances; i.e., the FCC limit of 2 Fg D CICs per “entity.”

For 2010, NANPA identified 173 Fg D CICs as “abandoned” (CICs assigned to companies no longer in business, or CICs assigned to companies that have sold assets to other entities, or companies that have been acquired by other entities through mergers/acquisitions). these CICs are now listed in NANPA’s records with no valid contact information. the assignee of these CICs and/or the companies that have acquired the CIC assignee company(ies) have failed to adhere to the CIC Assignment guidelines by providing NANPA with legal documentation of the activities described in this paragraph. NANPA has been unable to reclaim these “abandoned” CICs since activity (Fg D access and/or usage) appeared on access providers’ 2010 semi-annual CIC reports.


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

table 8: Monthly FG D assignments, denials and reclamations

Month Assigned Reclaimed/Returned Codes Applications Denied Applications Withdrawn

January 2 3 0 4

February 4 4 1 2

March 7 4 2 4

April 7 6 3 3

May 7 4 0 2

June 3 8 0 3

July 1 1 0 3

August 6 6 1 4

September 3 10 0 0

october 4 0 2 1

november 4 11 2 2

December 6 4 4 3

total 54 61 15 31

table 9: Monthly FG B assignments, denials and reclamations

Month Assigned Reclaimed/Returned Codes Applications Denied Applications Withdrawn

January 0 0 0 0

February 0 0 0 0

March 1 2 0 0

April 0 0 0 0

May 0 0 0 2

June 0 0 0 1

July 0 0 0 0

August 0 2 0 0

September 0 1 0 0

october 0 0 0 0

november 0 1 0 0

December 3 1 0 1

total 4 7 0 4

FG B CIC ActivityDuring 2010, 4 Fg b CICs were assigned by NANPA and 7 Fg b CICS were returned/reclaimed. At the end of 2010, 272 Fg b CICs were assigned in total. the potential exhaust of the Fg b CIC resource is not a concern based on the current rate of assignment.

As of the end of 2010, NANPA had identified 56 Fg b CICs as “abandoned” (CICs assigned to companies no longer in business, or CICs assigned to companies that have sold assets to other entities, or companies that have been

acquired by other entities through mergers/acquisitions). these CICs are now listed in NANPA’s records with no valid contact information. the assignee of these CICs and/or the companies that have acquired the CIC assignee company(ies) have failed to adhere to the CIC Assignment guidelines by providing NANPA with legal documentation of the activities described in this paragraph. NANPA has been unable to reclaim these “abandoned” CICs since activity (Fg b usage and/or access) appeared on access providers’ 2010 semi-annual CIC reports.


CoDe ADMINIStRAtIoN

Resource Report – n11 Codes Contact: John Manning, 571–434–5770

N11 codes, listed with their descriptions in the table below, are the only valid three-digit telephone numbers in the NANP.

the FCC administers N11 codes in the u.S., pursuant to the telecommunications Act of 1996. the Canadian Radio-television and telecommunications Commission (CRtC) administers N11 codes in Canada. It should be noted that 411 and 611, although long used for the purposes indicated in the table below, have not been formally assigned by the FCC in the u.S. at this time.

there was no N11 assignment activity in 2010.

n11 Code Description

211 Community information and referral services

311 Non-emergency police and other governmental services (u.S.)

411 local directory assistance511 traffic and transportation information

(u.S.); Provision of Weather and traveler Information Services (Canada)

611 Repair service711 telecommunications relay service (tRS)811 Access to one Call Services to Protect

Pipeline and utilities from excavation Damage (u.S.); Non-urgent Health teletriage Services (Canada)

911 emergency

Resource Report – 456–nXX Codes Contact: John Manning, 571–434–5770

the purpose of NPA 456 and its associated NXXs is to enable the routing of inbound international calls for carrier-specific services, particular to that service provider’s network, to and between countries served by the NANP. NANPA assigns 456–NXX codes to carriers under industry-developed guidelines that may be found on the AtIS website at http://www.atis.org/inc/incguides.asp. the guidelines are entitled International Inbound NPA (INt/NPA/NXX) Assignment guidelines, AtIS-0300049.

No 456–NXX assignments were requested during 2010. A complete list of 456–NXX assignments may be found on the NANPA website, www.nanpa.com.

Resource Report – 800–855 numbers Contact: John Manning, 571–434–5770

800–855 numbers are used only for the purpose of

accessing public services on the Public Switched telephone Network (PStN) intended for the deaf, hard of hearing or speech impaired. NANPA assigns these numbers in accordance with industry-developed guidelines that may be found on the AtIS website at http://www.atis.org/inc/incguides.asp.

there were thirty-three (33) 800–855 number assignments made in 2010. A complete list of 800–855 assignments may be found on the NANPA website, www.nanpa.com.

Resource Report – Automatic number Identification “II” Digits Contact: John Manning, 571–434–5770

Automatic Number Identification (ANI) Information Integers (“II”) digits are digit pairs sent with the originating telephone number. the digit pair identifies the type of originating station; e.g., plain old telephone service (PotS) or hotel/motel. NANPA assigns these numbers in accordance with industry-developed guidelines that may be found on the AtIS website at http://www.atis.org/inc/incguides.asp. Requests for the assignment of ANI II digits are referred to the INC for consideration. If the INC approves the request, NANPA makes the assignment. A complete list of ANI II assignments may be found on the NANPA website, www.nanpa.com.

No ANI II digit assignments were made in 2010.

Resource Report – Vertical Service Codes Contact: John Manning, 571–434–5770

Vertical Service Codes (VSCs) are customer-dialed codes in the *XX or *2XX dialing format for touch-tone and the 11XX or 112XX dialing format for rotary phones. they are used to provide customer access to features and services (e.g., call forwarding, automatic callback, etc.) provided by network service providers such as local exchange carriers, interexchange carriers or commercial mobile radio service (CMRS) providers. NANPA assigns VSCs in accordance with industry-developed guidelines that may be found on the AtIS website at http://www.atis.org/inc/incguides.asp.

NANPA made one VSC assignments in 2010. VSC *09 was assigned for Selective Call blocking/Reporting and allows the subscriber, after receiving an unwanted call, to initiate the automatic capture and analysis of network information related to the unwanted call that may be used to determine potential violations of any state and federal regulations. Future calls from this unwanted caller are automatically blocked.

A complete listing of assigned VSCs is available on the NANPA website, www.nanpa.com.


NPA RelIeF PlANNINg oVeRVIeW

npA Relief planning overviewContacts: Wayne Milby, 804–795–5919 and Joe Cocke, 805–520–1945

NPA relief planning precedes the introduction of new geographic area codes. the relief planning process is described in detail in the document entitled NPA Code Relief Planning and Notification guidelines, AtIS-0300061, which can be found on the AtIS website at www.atis.org/inc/incguides.asp.

NANPA plays a key role in NPA relief planning. At least 36 months before the anticipated exhaust of an NPA in the u.S. or its territories, NANPA’s relief planners notify the local industry and state regulatory commission of the impending exhaust and convene a preliminary planning meeting to discuss local dialing arrangements, communities of interest and other pertinent issues to identify viable methods of relief. using input from this meeting, relief planners prepare and distribute an initial planning document (IPD) for consideration that outlines several alternative relief plans. NANPA then facilitates an industry meeting (more than one if necessary) to consider the options presented in the IPD and any others that may be proposed. NANPA next prepares a petition explaining the options considered and describes the recommended relief option(s) if the industry has reached consensus to do so. the relief planner submits the petition on behalf of the industry to the state regulatory commission for approval.

the respective state commission reviews the proposed plan and often conducts public hearings and invites public comment. When that occurs, the relief planner actively participates and may be called upon to testify relating to various aspects of the proposed relief plan. After the state commission has approved a plan, which may not be one of the options considered by the industry, NANPA requests assignment of the NPA relief code to implement the plan, then convenes and facilitates the first industry implementation meeting. using decisions made at the initial implementation meeting, the relief planner then prepares and publishes a planning letter on the NANPA website. the planning letter announces the method of relief selected, the identity of the new area code, the schedule for relief, the new dialing plan, the test number for the new area code and, in the case of a split, a list of the prefixes moving to the new area code and those remaining in the area code that is receiving relief.

NANPA’s relief planners interface closely with Central office Code Administrators and Pooling Administrators. Relief planners schedule and facilitate jeopardy conference calls and are closely involved in decisions about the timing of relief activities involving central office codes.

In 2010, NANPA initiated two new NPA relief planning projects (tennessee and California) and filed two NPA relief petitions with the appropriate state public service commissions (texas and New Hampshire). NANPA conducted five initial NPA implementation meetings as well as facilitated three pending petition review meetings for a petition not yet filed with the state regulatory commission (Indiana). two industry implementation schedules were filed by NANPA on behalf of the industry (Arkansas and New York). NANPA also responded to a state request to provide area code maps of identified relief options and participated in ten state-sponsored hearings and technical workshops concerning area code relief (New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and tennessee).

NANPA relief planners facilitated 17 meetings, conducted entirely by conference calls. they shadowed nearly fifty industry NPA relief implementation meetings. to keep the industry informed, NANPA issued 64 notifications using the NNS. NANPA created and published ten planning letters describing the details of ongoing area code relief projects and other NPA relief-related state regulatory orders.

Relief planning Quality MeasurementsIndustry guidelines prescribe time limitations for the completion of many NPA relief planning activities. to quantify the timeliness of its relief planning work, NANPA has established objectives for the completion of many additional activities, as shown in table 11. In 2010, NANPA completed 100% of the 36 tracked activities on schedule.



table 11: Relief planning timeliness

performance Measurement events in 2010 Completed on time % on time completion

Initiated NPA relief planning within 36 months of NPA exhaust.

1 1 100%

Distributed initial industry meeting notice within 8 weeks of relief meeting date.

1 1 100%

Distributed IPD within 4 weeks of relief meeting date. 1 1 100%

Distributed meeting minutes within 2 weeks or date set at the meeting.

12 12 100%

Held minutes review by date set at the meeting. 2 2 100%

Filed relief–related petitions by date set at the meeting.

2 2 100%

Requested relief NPA assignment within 1 week of regulatory approval.

4 4 100%

Issued press release within 2 weeks after relief NPA code assignment.

1 1 100%

Held implementation meeting within 45 days after relief NPA code assignment.

4 4 100%

Held jeopardy meeting within 30 calendar days after jeopardy declaration.

0 0 N/A

Posted planning letter or notice of industry meeting on website within 3 weeks after implementation meeting.

5 5 100%

Posted planning letter on website within 10 business days after regulatory change.

3 3 100%

Distribute IPD 4 weeks after date jeopardy was declared, if relief planning has not been initiated.

0 0 N/A

Hold industry relief planning meeting 8 weeks after date jeopardy was declared, if relief planning has not been initiated.

0 0 N/A

totals 36 36 100%

Relief planners also measured the promptness of their responses to voicemail and email messages. Results showed that NANPA relief planners responded to 100% of client voicemails and email messages by no later than the end of the next business day.

Customer Survey FeedbackParticipants at the two initial relief planning meetings held in 2010 were asked to evaluate NANPA’s performance by completing a survey containing the 11 statements

shown in table 12. Participants indicated their opinion using a 5-point scale, with 5 indicating “strongly agree” and 1 indicating “strongly disagree.” the participants of the relief planning meetings held during the year responded and rated their overall satisfaction with NANPA’s conduct of the meetings an average of 4.92 out of a maximum of 5.00. the 2010 ratings for the questions asked in the survey were consistent with previous year ratings, with scores ranging from 4.70 to 5.00.



table 12: Relief planning meeting satisfaction

Question 2010

overall satisfied with conduct of meeting? 4.92

Received adequate meeting notice from NANPA?

4.92

NANPA was an effective facilitator? 4.90

Participant had an adequate opportunity to express opinions?

4.92

NANPA conducted the meeting impartially? 4.92

NANPA provided satisfactory response to questions and concerns?

4.90

NANPA provided satisfactory information about code history and NPA status?

5.00

explained relief alternatives effectively? 4.92

Quality of documents and information provided was satisfactory?

4.83

NANPA presented well-developed and reasonable relief alternatives?

4.90

Participant could easily obtain documents? 4.73

In 2010, NANPA routinely conducted surveys to measure the quality of conference calls (other than initial relief planning meetings), where most of the industry’s issues are discussed and resolved.

During a one-month sampling period in each quarter, meeting participants rated NANPA’s performance in ten areas (using the same rating scale described previously), such as timely notification, audio quality, facilitation skills and meeting preparation. the survey covered six conference calls, including topics such as area code jeopardy, minutes review, regulatory filing review and implementation meetings. the participants on the sampled conference calls responded to the survey and rated their overall satisfaction with NANPA’s conduct of the calls an average of 4.88 out of a maximum of 5.00 (See table 13). the 2010 ratings for the questions asked in the survey were consistent with previous year ratings, with scores ranging from 4.70 to 5.00.

table 13: Relief planning conference call satisfaction

Question 2010

overall satisfaction with NANPA’s conduct of the conference call?

4.88

NANPA conducted the conference call in an impartial manner?

4.88

NANPA provided adequate notice of the conference call?

4.87

Adequate opportunity to express opinions during the call?

4.86

NANPA was well prepared for the meeting? 4.89

NANPA was an effective facilitator on the call? 4.84

Quality of documents and information was satisfactory?

4.86

Information provided prior to the call was sufficient?

4.88

easily able to obtain documents? 4.79

the conference call facilities (e.g., sound quality) were satisfactory?

4.76



Relief planning processNANPA’s relief planners use the following practices to ensure an efficient and effective relief planning process:• A “pre-planning” conference call precedes preparation

of each IPD, allowing those with useful local knowledge to contribute to the development of better relief options. Rate center lists are now distributed much earlier in the relief planning process, allowing the industry and state regulatory commissions more time to study this information prior to relief planning meetings.

• All meetings are conducted by conference call to reduce travel costs and increase participation, except in unusual circumstances and/or at the specific request of the industry.

• At the beginning of each conference call, the NANPA relief planner explains the manner in which the consensus process will be applied in a uniform, impartial manner in the event participants choose to leave the call unannounced.

• to expedite the meeting process, participants are notified in meeting announcements that they are responsible for downloading and reviewing the documents to be discussed prior to the meeting. NANPA does not distribute documents while conference calls are in progress.

• NANPA facilitates industry meetings to review and modify the quantity of codes set aside for number pooling when an NPA is in jeopardy. Per industry guidelines, NANPA re-opens jeopardy procedures in order to permit the industry to determine via consensus if modifications to those procedures are needed.

• NANPA includes historical relief planning information in NPA jeopardy meeting announcements, providing attendees access to important background information that will be of assistance during the meeting.

• NANPA shadows industry NPA relief implementation subcommittee meetings to stay informed on the progress of the implementation as well as to gather and share knowledge gained via these activities with other similar relief efforts.

• NANPA publishes monthly reports on the status of NPA relief projects. In addition, during the NPA relief planning process, a state regulator or the industry may specify further action that NANPA is required to undertake based on a related event or trigger point expected to occur sometime in the future. NANPA provides a report that lists these events and associated activities.


NuMbeRINg ReSouRCe utIlIZAtIoN/FoReCASt

Contact: Al Cipparone, 571–434–5789

the collection of utilization and forecast data, known as Numbering Resource utilization/Forecast (NRuF) Reporting, has been in effect since 2000. Per the FCC, NANPA is charged with collecting and reporting this data. Service providers are required to report utilization and forecast data twice a year. utilization data includes the quantity of assigned, intermediate, aging, administrative and reserved numbers. Forecast data typically is comprised of a five-year forecast of the quantity of thousands-blocks and/or codes by rate center. the FCC also requires access to disaggregated NRuF data by state regulatory commissions for heightened reporting enforcement, including the responsibility to withhold numbering resources from service providers that fail to file utilization and forecast reports.

NANPA collects, sorts and stores NRuF data submitted by service providers. Data may be submitted via NAS, email (i.e. excel™ workbook), electronic File transfer (eFt), compact disk or paper. In 2010, NANPA processed nearly 17,800 NRuF submissions, the highest number of submissions since NRuF was initiated ten years ago. NANPA processed these submissions within a ten-day time frame and provided confirmation of receipt within five days of receiving each submission. In addition to processing submissions, the NRuF administrators also responded to over 1,900 telephone calls and email inquiries.

In November 2010, NANPA enhanced the utilization Missing Report available in NAS. the utilization Missing Report identifies the central office codes in which the code assignee failed to submit utilization data. In November, this report was modified to include thousands-blocks (NPA–NXX–X) as well as central office codes. using data obtained from the Pooling Administrator, the system compares thousands-block assignment data with the utilization data collected from service providers during the semi-annual NRuF reporting process. through this comparison, NANPA can identify the assigned thousands-blocks for which no utilization data was provided and contact the service provider to which the thousands-block is assigned to request that it submit appropriate utilization information.

the Donation Discrepancy Report was also added to NAS in 2010. this new report identifies a specific thousands-block marked as “donated” on the NRuF submission but is shown as assigned in the Pooling Administrator

assignment data to the same operating Company Number (oCN) that indicated the thousands-block was donated. Service providers use this report to identify discrepancies between their resource inventory and that of the Pooling Administrator so that appropriate steps can be taken to resolve these differences.

In conjunction with the reports noted above, NANPA conducted NAS-NRuF training sessions for service providers and state regulators. Specific sessions were held with service providers to review the changes to the utilization Missing Report and the new Donation Discrepancy Report and the steps they could take to address the data contained in the reports. over 150 individuals representing 140 service providers participated. A separate training session was conducted for state regulators to familiarize them with these two reports. Also covered during this session was an overview of NANPA’s process for contacting service providers with missing utilization data in order to obtain the missing information. the training incorporated the use of WebextM to allow participants to follow a demonstration of various NAS NRuF capabilities. Applicable training documentation updated in support of the educational efforts included the NRuF on-line user guide, geographic Job Aid and Non-geographic Job Aid.


NuMbeRINg ReSouRCe utIlIZAtIoN/FoReCASt

table 14: Summary of the volume of nRuF submissions and associated items for 2010

Qualitative Measurements Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep oct nov Dec

Form 502 email Submissions

2,253 952 343 185 113 99 2,187 619 254 168 77 78

Form 502 FtP Submissions

833 195 44 9 380 33 788 150 27 16 41 45

Form 502 Web Submissions

2,731 554 301 224 261 215 1,659 738 400 293 230 295

total Submissions 5,817 1,701 688 418 754 347 4,634 1,507 681 477 348 418

error Notifications Sent 520 236 78 36 50 29 399 209 48 54 44 17

Missing utilization Notifications Sent

0 161 1 0 0 0 0 144 1 0 0 0

Anomalous Notifications Sent

0 172 176 6 0 0 0 42 366 38 0 0

Confirmation Notifications Sent

2,542 909 309 158 443 103 2,556 562 234 130 74 102

Phone Calls/ emails Received

247 274 228 144 75 89 208 204 171 150 67 72

State Reports Created 2 0 30 1 1 3 1 0 30 1 0 0

Job Aids Created/Revised 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 0

2010 nRuF exhaust Forecastsone of the primary uses for NRuF data is to support forecasts of the exhaust date for each NPA as well as the exhaust date for the entire NANP. Detailed projections can be found in Attachments 6 and 7 to this annual report. the methodology used to produce the 2010 NPA exhaust projections was similar to the methodology NANPA has used in the past several years to project area code exhaust and had previously been reviewed with the North American Numbering Council and the FCC. In reporting the NPA exhaust projections, NANPA provides the previously-projected NPA exhaust time frames in order to view the changes that have occurred over time.

NANPA projects NPA and NANP exhaust on a semi-annual basis. exhaust projections are available at the end of April and october. throughout the year, NANPA monitors central office code assignment rates in all area codes and will adjust the projected NPA exhaust date if necessary. events that may impact the projected exhaust date include a significant change in Co code demand, the assignment or return of a large quantity of Co codes or the implementation of central office code rationing.


otHeR NANPA SeRVICeS

NANPA is required to offer specific services as enterprise services. enterprise services are additional services that may be provided for a specific fee by NANPA.

AoCn enterprise ServiceContact: Heidi Wayman, 425–335 –1351

upon request, NANPA will enter data for a service provider’s assigned central office codes and thousands-blocks into the database used by the industry to configure the network for the proper routing and rating of calls. this is an enterprise service; i.e., a service for which NANPA is permitted to charge a fee and a contract between the service provider and NANPA is required. NANPA currently provides this service for over 250 service providers.

Although NANPA is required to provide this service, service providers are not required to select NANPA. the service provider may select another company to enter this information or may elect to enter the data themselves.

Providers of this data entry service are identified by numbers, called Administrative operating Company Numbers (AoCNs). over time, the company providing the data input service has come to be called the service provider’s “AoCN.”

AoCn Quality MeasurementsNANPA’s AoCN primary service objective is to complete data entry within five business days of receiving a request. NANPA’s performance in 2010, shown in table 15, reflects outstanding service, ensuring that service providers’ routing data is input into the appropriate databases to enable the proper routing of calls.

entry of paper Submissions of Resource ApplicationsContact: John Manning, 571–434–5770

NANPA will enter paper submissions (faxed, scanned or mailed copies) of resource applications into the NAS

on behalf of the applicant. this includes the application form as well as the in-service confirmation forms (e.g., for central office code administration, the Part 1 and Part 3 forms). In 2010, NANPA processed two paper resource applications.

entry of paper nRuF SubmissionsNANPA will enter paper submissions (faxed, scanned, or mailed copies) of the NRuF Form 502 into NAS on behalf of the service provider. Normally, respondents submit data through email, FtP or on-line via NAS. For a fee, NANPA will accept and input data submitted by mail, scan, or by fax. In 2010, no service provider used this service.

nAnpA testimony in State Regulatory HearingsNANPA will prepare, file and present oral and written testimony at no charge. Should the state require a NANPA witness(es) to attend the hearing in person, NANPA will require the state to reimburse it for associated expenses (e.g., travel, lodging, meals, local transportation, etc.) for the witness(es) and legal counsel. If the state requires local counsel to represent NANPA at state regulatory hearings, these costs will be passed along to the state. In 2010, no state used this service.

Customized ReportsNANPA offers customized reports for publicly-available NPA, central office code and other resource assignment data. Specifically, NANPA creates and provides publicly-available data in different formats to accommodate requests to cull data and provide customized reports for a fee that is reasonable and based on its costs. NANPA negotiates a reasonable price with each requestor. Pricing will depend upon report development time and effort, frequency, delivery mechanism and other variables. In 2010, NANPA created no customized reports.

table 15: 2010 AoCn Quality Results


Percentage of AoCN inputs completed in 5 days

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Percentage of AoCN phone calls returned by the end of the next business day

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

total number of AoCN calls 33 30 28 32 33 30 47 50 47 46 45 42



table 16: nAnpA InC Issues Introduced in 2010 and Supporting Contributions

Issue # Contribution Issue Statement

674 Co/NXX 462 and 462rev1 update Section 6.3.4 of the CoCAg to address adequate notification for rate center changes

675 NPA 263 and 263rev1 edits to NPA Code Relief Planning and Notification guidelines to include service provider contact information in Planning letter

679 Co/NXX 465 update Appendix C, Section 2.1.1 regarding timing to update records for code reallocation

682* update Definition of North American Numbering Plan Administration

684 Co/NXX 466 Clarification of Submitted Part 4 for Codes

691 Co/NXX 468 and 468rev1 Requesting NXXs and NXX–Xs after a Merger/Acquisition

692** RAM 007 update 5YY Requirements for Resources

700 RAM 004 Clarification to Section 6.3.1 of the NRuF guidelines

703 Reservation of Future PCS NPA Codes beyond the 5YY Series

* Issue statement contained suggested text changes to the guidelines.

** Indicates additional INC participants sponsored the issue and/or contribution.

table 17: nAnpA 2010 Contributions to other Issues

Issue # Contribution number Contribution title

Issue 670 – Remove attaching part 2 form to Co Code request (part 1)

Co/NXX 464 edit Section 1.8 from Co Code Request Part 1 Form

It should be noted that in 2010, the INC re-organized its subtending committees into three (3) standing subcommittees: Resource Assignment and Management Subcommittee (RAM), Number and Addressing Resource Planning Subcommittee (NARP) and the Document Management/Maintenance (DMM) Subcommittee.

Financial Resultsernst & Young audits NANPA’s statements of revenues and direct expenditures associated with NANPA’s enterprise services. the audit is conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the united States and the standards applicable to financial audits in government Auditing Standards. the statements of revenues and direct expenditures are prepared for the purpose of complying with the July 2009 NANPA technical Requirements Document.

InC participationContact: beth Sprague, 571–434–5513

NANPA was an active participant in the Industry Numbering Committee (INC) during 2010, introducing 9 new issues and submitting 8 contributions, as shown in the following tables. In 2010, NANPA provided the INC with written communications concerning the approval for reclamations, updates on NANPA resources and updates on NANPA’s interactions with regulatory authorities. In addition, NANPA served as co-chair of the NPA Subcommittee.



nAnpA WebsiteContact: John Manning, 571–434–5770

the NANPA website, www.nanpa.com, is the primary public source of numbering information. It provides a complete description of the different services offered by NANPA. these services include resource administration, area code relief planning, NRuF data collection and analysis and enterprise services. All of the various numbering resources administered by NANPA, including a description of their use and links to their associated administration guidelines, can be easily accessed via the website. Area code maps, planning letters, newsletters and other NANPA publications are readily available. the NANPA website is also the gateway into NAS.

Popular on the website are the numerous downloadable reports on the various resources NANPA administers. Many of the reports are available real-time, providing the most up-to-date source on resource availability. Some of the most frequently accessed reports include the following:

• TheCentralOfficeCodeAvailabilityandUtilizationReports provide up-to-date lists of all central office codes generally available or unavailable for assignment by geographic area code. the data is also available by NPA in a downloadable format (text and exceltM).

• TheCentralOfficeCodeAssignmentActivityRecordsprovide the quantity of central office codes assigned and returned for each geographic area code on a monthly basis.

• ThePart3Disconnectreportprovidesadailylistingofcentral office codes with a pending disconnect date.

• TheCentralOfficeCodeActivityStatusReportprovidesthe total number of new applications processed by NANPA by month for each state, including assignments, denials and return requests.

• Downloadablereportscontainingassignmentinformation for CICs, 555 line numbers and 5YY and 9YY resources.

• GeographicAreaCodessortedbynumberandlocation.

• Plannedareacodesnotyetinserviceaswellasareacodes introduced since 1995.

• TheNPAReliefActivityStatusReportprovidesinformation on all active and pending NPA relief projects in the united States.

• TheNPAReliefPlanningTriggersReportidentifiesspecific actions to be initiated based on a related event or trigger point expected to occur sometime in the future.

throughout the website, there are various documents available to assist the user. As an example, for NRuF, the following documentation is available: NAS NRuF on-line user guide, geographic and Non-geographic NRuF Job Aids, Rate Center Abbreviation list and a listing of common NRuF errors and corrections. Similar types of documents are available for Central office Code Administration and NPA relief planning. Attachment 8 provides a listing of where important numbering documents and other information is available on the internet.

the home page of the website offers links to recent information or activity, under the “What’s New” section. Also included is a section called “NANPA Fast track,” containing links to the most visited pages on the website. Included under the “NANPA Fast track” section is a capability that allows the user to search for information about a specific NPA. Information that can be found includes if and/or when the area code was assigned, the location of the NPA, the in-service date where applicable, the NPA that it relieved, the time zone associated with the area code, the NPA dialing plan and other valuable data. the NPA database may also be downloaded from the NANPA website.

the website also provides the ability for interested parties to submit questions related to numbering issues and receive responses. Many such questions are received by NANPA daily. In 2010, NANPA received nearly 500 inquiries via its feedback mechanism. Inquiries range from the general public requesting information on dialing plans and companies seeking the latest information concerning the assignment of area codes and prefixes to how to establish telecommunications businesses and obtain numbering resources. Responding to these questions is a valuable service provided by NANPA to the general public.

numerous enhancements were made to the website in 2010:• ThecolorschemeusedontheNANPApublicandsecure

website was modified from blue to green and gray in order to bring additional clarity to the website, primarily in the various toolbars that appear throughout the pages on the site. the layout and content of the website did not change.

• Thefour(4)FCCNROOrderswereaddedtothe website to provide easier access to these important numbering documents.



• AnewlinkwasaddedtotheFCC’sTelecommunicationsReporting Worksheet Form 499-A, which provides contact information for service providers and identifies whether the provider offers local, wireless or toll services.

• Alinktothedocumenttitled“EvidenceofStateCertification” was added under the Co Code Reports. this document identifies what each state regulatory authority requires for evidence of certification to provide local service.

NANPA also conducted five (5) NANPA public website training sessions in 2010 in an effort to help improve users’ understanding of the information available on the site. over 125 individuals took advantage of this opportunity and indicated a high level of satisfaction with the training.

nAnpA newslettersNANPA publishes quarterly newsletters and posts them on the NANPA website. these newsletters provide up-to-date information on resource assignments and trends, area code relief planning activities, notifications concerning NRuF submission requirements and other general number administration information. In 2010, articles that appeared addressed the identification of an effective date for inclusion on a central office code application, 800–855 line number assignment information, the status of outstanding NANPA change orders and using the Part 3 approval date of a code or thousands-block transfer to determine under which oCN utilization is to be reported.

Support for nAnp Countries other than the u.S.the NANP is unique among the world’s numbering plans in that it serves 19 independent countries. these countries include the united States and its territories, Canada, bermuda, Anguilla, Antigua & barbuda, the bahamas, barbados, the british Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Dominica, the Dominican Republic, grenada, Jamaica, Montserrat, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. lucia, St. Vincent and the grenadines, trinidad and tobago, and turks & Caicos.

one of NANPA’s most important roles is to coordinate the assignment of numbering resources that must be shared equitably by all of the participating countries. Area codes are, of course, the primary shared resource, but there are others. For example, entities in Canada, Anguilla, bermuda and the Dominican Republic use CICs. Canadian entities offer 900 services and thus share the supply of 9YY–NXX codes. NANPA may interface with other countries’ national numbering administrators during the

resource request and assignment process. Normally, the national administrator receives the requests, ensures that their country’s regulatory requirements are met, and forwards the requests to NANPA. NANPA verifies that industry requirements are met and assigns the resources if appropriate to do so.

Sint Maarten was approved to join the NANP and was assigned the 721 area code in 2009. Implementation of the 721 area code was delayed in 2010. However, plans are underway for the 721 NPA to be implemented in 2011.

Support to the FCC, State Commissions and the nAnCIn order to ensure the proper and efficient administration of NANP resources, NANPA meets regularly with the FCC, state commissions and the North American Numbering Council (NANC) in support of their needs for numbering information.

ongoing communications between NANPA and the FCC are necessary to ensure proper administration and management of NANP resources. under the FCC contract, NANPA provided numerous reports and other documentation required by the contract. these reports consisted of monthly reports on central office code assignments, assignment of other NANP resources such as CICs, area code relief planning projects, NAS performance and NANPA staffing. NANPA provided the FCC with service provider-specific utilization and forecast data submitted by carriers via the NRuF reporting process. NANPA reviews with the FCC issues concerning authorized access to numbering resources. As necessary, NANPA will meet with the FCC to discuss numbering in general and highlight those activities impacting number resource use and optimization.

over the past 18 months (July 2009 to December 2010), Neustar operated under a six-month contract, with two 6-month options, to perform the NANPA function. In December 2010, the NANPA contract was extended by the FCC for another six months, covering the time period of January through July 2011. During 2010, NANPA worked closely with the FCC to renew appropriate NAS hardware and software maintenance agreements set to expire in the second half of 2010. Further, NANPA secured FCC approval to replace the two existing NAS database servers, which were purchased in 2003. NANPA also submitted to the FCC proposed changes to NAS in response to modifications to industry guidelines and system requirements.



NANPA continued to support state regulatory authorities by providing them with the number utilization data collected via semi-annual NRuF reporting and assisted state regulators in following up with the appropriate service providers with regard to this data. this included providing real-time access to NRuF data via NAS, with various reports and queries available to search and analyze the data. NANPA continued to supply state regulators with Part 1 and Part 3 reports, which provided a listing on a daily, weekly or monthly basis of all Part 1s and Part 3s processed by NANPA for their respective area codes. these reports also include the Pooling Administration System tracking number as well as the application type (e.g., lRN request, pool replenishment, dedicated customer).

NANPA worked closely with state regulators to address specific issues or concerns associated with individual service provider requests for resources. Further, as NPA exhaust approached, NANPA ensured the state regulators were kept informed of the latest exhaust projections and provided updated information concerning NPA relief alternatives, to include refreshing the projected lives of proposed relief alternatives. NANPA representatives and state commissions discussed specific activity and issues associated with active, pending or planned NPA relief projects. For instance, in 2010, NANPA participated in public input hearings in Pennsylvania’s 570, 717 and 814 area codes, presenting the NPA relief alternatives under consideration and answering questions from the public. NANPA appeared before the tennessee Regulatory Authority to provide a briefing on area code exhaust within the state and relief efforts to be initiated in the near future. NANPA met with state representatives participating in the NANC to assist in their understanding of NANPA’s role in the industry. NANPA provided guidance to numerous state regulators on issues such as the scheduling of public meetings on NPA relief options and providing

notification to the industry, obtaining maps containing county, city and rate center boundaries, participating in state technical meetings and workshops discussing NPA implementation, issuing press releases announcing new area codes and responding to state commission inquiries and data requests. NANPA also participated in meetings with state public service commission staffs to address specific concerns pertaining to current resource administration practices and possible modifications to industry procedures.

NANPA continued to participate in bi-monthly conference calls with the state commission staffs and provide updates on its activities and solicit input on any numbering-related matter. this opportunity was used to review internal processes and to ensure a complete understanding of the responsibilities of NANPA, service providers and the state regulators.

NANPA provided monthly reports to the NANC throughout 2010. these reports highlighted central office code assignment activity, NPA relief planning activity, status reports on other NANP resources administered by NANPA as well as NAS performance. NANPA also provided the results of the semi-annual NPA and NANP exhaust analysis and notified the NANC of the potential exhaust of the specific NPA resources.

NANPA worked closely with the NANC’s subtending organizations as well. NANPA participated in monthly meetings with the Numbering oversight Working group (NoWg), providing reports on performance measurements, NAS updates, a review of relevant numbering activities and NANPA performance improvement efforts. In 2010, NANPA created a Monthly operational Report that serves as a repository of various NANPA activities and events occurring throughout the year. NANPA also continued to manage the NANC-Chair web page, used for posting NANC and subtending working group documentation.


AttACHMeNt 1 – AReA CoDe INVeNtoRY

NPA codes are in NXX format, where N is any digit 2–9 and X is any digit 0–9, yielding 8*10*10 =800 combinations. of these, 119 are not assignable or have been set aside by the Industry Numbering Committee (INC) for special purposes. these 119 codes are listed below.

N11 (8) Abbreviated dialing

N9X (80) Reserved for use during expansion of the NANP

37X and 96X (20) Reserved by the INC for future use where contiguous blocks of codes are required

555 and 950 (2) Not used as NPA codes to avoid possible confusion

880–887 and 889 (9) Set aside for next series of toll-free codes.

Subtracting 119 from 800 leaves 681 assignable NPA codes. of these, 391 have been assigned. of these 391, 354 are in service and 37 are awaiting introduction. of the 354 NPA codes in service, 341 are geographic and 13 are non-geographic.

of the 681 assignable NPA codes, 290 are currently unassigned. of these codes, 47 are easily recognizable codes (eRCs) currently allocated for non-geographic use, and 243 are general-purpose codes. of these 243, 153 are reserved1 for use as future geographic codes, leaving 90 available, unreserved, general-purpose codes.

of the 47 unassigned eRCs, 10 are reserved2, leaving 37 available.

Reserved Codes are listed Below.

npA npA npA npA

220 389 568 768

221 421 572 782

223 427 576 789

232 428 583 820

235 429 584 821

236 436 624 824

238 437 625 825

247 439 634 826

257 445 639 835

258 448 640 837

259 449 642 838

261 451 645 839

263 453 652 840

271 457 656 841

273 460 658 851

278 461 665 852

279 463 672 854

280 468 676 861

286 471 680 871

287 472 683 875

324 474 685 879

326 476 686 921

328 481 726 923

329 483 728 924

332 485 729 926

341 486 735 927

346 487 739 930

353 489 742 934

354 521 743 942

357 535 745 945

359 536 746 946

362 537 748 948

363 546 749 953

364 548 750 957

367 550 752 981

368 558 753 982

382 560 756 986

384 565 761 987

387 — — —

1. these codes have been designated for the relief of NPAs that NRuF predicts will exhaust in the next 10 years. Also included are additional NPA codes reserved for use in Canada at the request of the CRtC.

2. these include the 4 codes reserved for future PCS expansion (522, 566, 577 and 588) and 6 of the codes reserved for Canada (622, 633, 644, 655, 677 and 688). Canada has also reserved 699, which is counted as an expansion code.


AttACHMeNt 2 – geogRAPHIC NPAS SoRteD bY loCAtIoN

Country location npA

Anguilla Anguilla 264

Antigua/barbuda Antigua/barbuda 268

bahamas bahamas 242

barbados barbados 246

bermuda bermuda 441

british Virgin Islands british Virgin Islands 284

Canada Alberta 403

Canada Alberta 587

Canada Alberta 780

Canada british Columbia 604

Canada british Columbia 778

Canada Canada 600

Canada Manitoba 204

Canada New brunswick 506

Canada Newfoundland 709

Canada Nova Scotia 902

Canada ontario 226

Canada ontario 289

Canada ontario 343

Canada ontario 416

Canada ontario 519

Canada ontario 613

Canada ontario 705

Canada ontario 807

Canada ontario 905

Canada Quebec 418

Canada Quebec 438

Canada Quebec 450

Canada Quebec 514

Canada Quebec 579

Canada Quebec 581

Canada Quebec 819

Canada Yukon, NW terr., Nunavut

867

Cayman Islands Cayman Islands 345

Dominica Dominica 767

Dominican Republic Dominican Republic 809




grenada grenada 473

Jamaica Jamaica 876

Montserrat Montserrat 664

St. Kitts & Nevis St. Kitts & Nevis 869

St. lucia St. lucia 758

St. Vincent & grenadines


784

trinidad & tobago trinidad & tobago 868

turks & Caicos Islands


649

uS AK 907

uS Al 205

uS Al 251

uS Al 256

uS Al 334

uS Al 938

uS American Samoa 684

uS AR 479

uS AR 501

uS AR 870

uS AZ 480

uS AZ 520

uS AZ 602

uS AZ 623

uS AZ 928

uS CA 209

uS CA 213

uS CA 310

uS CA 323

uS CA 408

uS CA 415

uS CA 424

uS CA 442

uS CA 510

uS CA 530

uS CA 559

uS CA 562

uS CA 619

uS CA 626


geogRAPHIC NPAS SoRteD bY loCAtIoN


uS CA 650

uS CA 657

uS CA 707

uS CA 714

uS CA 747

uS CA 760

uS CA 805

uS CA 818

uS CA 831

uS CA 858

uS CA 909

uS CA 916

uS CA 925

uS CA 949

uS CA 951

uS CNMI 670

uS Co 303

uS Co 719

uS Co 720

uS Co 970

uS Ct 203

uS Ct 475

uS Ct 860

uS DC 202

uS De 302

uS Fl 239

uS Fl 305

uS Fl 321

uS Fl 352

uS Fl 386

uS Fl 407

uS Fl 561

uS Fl 727

uS Fl 754

uS Fl 772

uS Fl 786

uS Fl 813

uS Fl 850

uS Fl 863


uS Fl 904

uS Fl 941

uS Fl 954

uS gA 229

uS gA 404

uS gA 470

uS gA 478

uS gA 678

uS gA 706

uS gA 762

uS gA 770

uS gA 912

uS guam 671

uS HI 808

uS IA 319

uS IA 515

uS IA 563

uS IA 641

uS IA 712

uS ID 208

uS Il 217

uS Il 224

uS Il 309

uS Il 312

uS Il 331

uS Il 618

uS Il 630

uS Il 708

uS Il 773

uS Il 779

uS Il 815

uS Il 847

uS Il 872

uS IN 219

uS IN 260

uS IN 317

uS IN 574

uS IN 765

uS IN 812




uS KS 316

uS KS 620

uS KS 785

uS KS 913

uS KY 270

uS KY 502

uS KY 606

uS KY 859

uS lA 225

uS lA 318

uS lA 337

uS lA 504

uS lA 985

uS MA 339

uS MA 351

uS MA 413

uS MA 508

uS MA 617

uS MA 774

uS MA 781

uS MA 857

uS MA 978

uS MD 240

uS MD 301

uS MD 410

uS MD 443

uS Me 207

uS MI 231

uS MI 248

uS MI 269

uS MI 313

uS MI 517

uS MI 586

uS MI 616

uS MI 734

uS MI 810

uS MI 906

uS MI 947

uS MI 989


uS MN 218

uS MN 320

uS MN 507

uS MN 612

uS MN 651

uS MN 763

uS MN 952

uS Mo 314

uS Mo 417

uS Mo 573

uS Mo 636

uS Mo 660

uS Mo 816

uS MS 228

uS MS 601

uS MS 662

uS MS 769

uS Mt 406

uS NC 252

uS NC 336

uS NC 704

uS NC 828

uS NC 910

uS NC 919

uS NC 980

uS ND 701

uS Ne 308

uS Ne 402

uS NH 603

uS NJ 201

uS NJ 551

uS NJ 609

uS NJ 732

uS NJ 848

uS NJ 856

uS NJ 862

uS NJ 908

uS NJ 973

uS NM 505




uS NM 575

uS NV 702

uS NV 775

uS NY 212

uS NY 315

uS NY 347

uS NY 516

uS NY 518

uS NY 585

uS NY 607

uS NY 631

uS NY 646

uS NY 716

uS NY 718

uS NY 845

uS NY 914

uS NY 917

uS oH 216

uS oH 234

uS oH 330

uS oH 419

uS oH 440

uS oH 513

uS oH 567

uS oH 614

uS oH 740

uS oH 937

uS oK 405

uS oK 580

uS oK 918

uS oR 458

uS oR 503

uS oR 541

uS oR 971

uS PA 215

uS PA 267

uS PA 412

uS PA 484

uS PA 570


uS PA 610

uS PA 717

uS PA 724

uS PA 814

uS PA 878

uS Puerto Rico 787

uS Puerto Rico 939

uS RI 401

uS SC 803

uS SC 843

uS SC 864

uS SD 605

uS tN 423

uS tN 615

uS tN 731

uS tN 865

uS tN 901

uS tN 931

uS tX 210

uS tX 214

uS tX 254

uS tX 281

uS tX 325

uS tX 361

uS tX 409

uS tX 430

uS tX 432

uS tX 469

uS tX 512

uS tX 682

uS tX 713

uS tX 806

uS tX 817

uS tX 830

uS tX 832

uS tX 903

uS tX 915

uS tX 936

uS tX 940




uS tX 956

uS tX 972

uS tX 979

uS uS 710

uS uS Virgin Islands 340

uS ut 385

uS ut 435

uS ut 801

uS VA 276

uS VA 434

uS VA 540

uS VA 571

uS VA 703

uS VA 757

uS VA 804

uS Vt 802

uS WA 206

uS WA 253

uS WA 360

uS WA 425

uS WA 509

uS WI 262

uS WI 414

uS WI 534

uS WI 608

uS WI 715

uS WI 920

uS WV 304

uS WV 681

uS WY 307

note: All geographic npAs were in service as of December 31, 2010.


AttACHMeNt 3 – geogRAPHIC NPAS SoRteD NuMeRICAllY

npA Country location

201 uS NJ

202 uS DC

203 uS Ct

204 Canada Manitoba

205 uS Al

206 uS WA

207 uS Me

208 uS ID

209 uS CA

210 uS tX

212 uS NY

213 uS CA

214 uS tX

215 uS PA

216 uS oH

217 uS Il

218 uS MN

219 uS IN

224 uS Il

225 uS lA

226 Canada ontario

228 uS MS

229 uS gA

231 uS MI

234 uS oH

239 uS Fl

240 uS MD

242 bahamas bahamas

246 barbados barbados

248 uS MI

250 Canada british Columbia

251 uS Al

252 uS NC

253 uS WA

254 uS tX

256 uS Al

260 uS IN

262 uS WI

264 Anguilla Anguilla


267 uS PA

268 Antigua/barbuda Antigua/barbuda

269 uS MI

270 uS KY

276 uS VA

281 uS tX

284 british Virgin Islands british Virgin Islands

289 Canada ontario

301 uS MD

302 uS De

303 uS Co

304 uS WV

305 uS Fl

306 Canada Saskatchewan

307 uS WY

308 uS Ne

309 uS Il

310 uS CA

312 uS Il

313 uS MI

314 uS Mo

315 uS NY

316 uS KS

317 uS IN

318 uS lA

319 uS IA

320 uS MN

321 uS Fl

323 uS CA

325 uS tX

330 uS oH

331 uS Il

334 uS Al

336 uS NC

337 uS lA

339 uS MA

340 uS uS Virgin Islands

343 Canada ontario

345 Cayman Islands Cayman Islands


geogRAPHIC NPAS SoRteD NuMeRICAllY


347 uS NY

351 uS MA

352 uS Fl

360 uS WA

361 uS tX

385 uS ut

386 uS Fl

401 uS RI

402 uS Ne

403 Canada Alberta

404 uS gA

405 uS oK

406 uS Mt

407 uS Fl

408 uS CA

409 uS tX

410 uS MD

412 uS PA

413 uS MA

414 uS WI

415 uS CA

416 Canada ontario

417 uS Mo

418 Canada Quebec

419 uS oH

423 uS tN

424 uS CA

425 uS WA

430 uS tX

432 uS tX

434 uS VA

435 uS ut

438 Canada Quebec

440 uS oH

441 bermuda bermuda

442 uS CA

443 uS MD

450 Canada Quebec

458 uS oR


469 uS tX

470 uS gA

473 grenada grenada

475 uS Ct

478 uS gA

479 uS AR

480 uS AZ

484 uS PA

501 uS AR

502 uS KY

503 uS oR

504 uS lA

505 uS NM

506 Canada New brunswick

507 uS MN

508 uS MA

509 uS WA

510 uS CA

512 uS tX

513 uS oH

514 Canada Quebec

515 uS IA

516 uS NY

517 uS MI

518 uS NY

519 Canada ontario

520 uS AZ

530 uS CA

534 uS WI

540 uS VA

541 uS oR

551 uS NJ

559 uS CA

561 uS Fl

562 uS CA

563 uS IA

567 uS oH

570 uS PA

571 uS VA




573 uS Mo

574 uS IN

575 uS NM

579 Canada Quebec

580 uS oK

581 Canada Quebec

586 uS MI

587 Canada Alberta

601 uS MS

602 uS AZ

603 uS NH


605 uS SD

606 uS KY

607 uS NY

608 uS WI

609 uS NJ

610 uS PA

612 uS MN

613 Canada ontario

614 uS oH

615 uS tN

616 uS MI

617 uS MA

618 uS Il

619 uS CA

620 uS KS

623 uS AZ

626 uS CA

630 uS Il

631 uS NY

636 uS Mo

641 uS IA

646 uS NY

647 Canada ontario

649 turks & Caicos Islands


650 uS CA

651 uS MN


657 uS CA

661 uS CA

662 uS MS

664 Montserrat Montserrat

670 uS CNMI

671 uS guam

678 uS gA

681 uS WV

682 uS tX

684 uS American Samoa

701 uS ND

702 uS NV

703 uS VA

704 uS NC

705 Canada ontario

706 uS gA

707 uS CA

708 uS Il

709 Canada Newfoundland

710 uS uS

712 uS IA

713 uS tX

714 uS CA

715 uS WI

716 uS NY

717 uS PA

718 uS NY

719 uS Co

720 uS Co

724 uS PA

727 uS Fl

731 uS tN

732 uS NJ

734 uS MI

740 uS oH

747 uS CA

754 uS Fl

757 uS VA

758 St. lucia St. lucia




760 uS CA

762 uS gA

763 uS MN

765 uS IN

767 Dominica Dominica

769 uS MS

770 uS gA

772 uS Fl

773 uS Il

774 uS MA

775 uS NV


779 uS Il

780 Canada Alberta

781 uS MA

784 St. Vincent & grenadines


785 uS KS

786 uS Fl

787 uS Puerto Rico

801 uS ut

802 uS Vt

803 uS SC

804 uS VA

805 uS CA

806 uS tX

807 Canada ontario

808 uS HI

809 Dominican Republic Dominican Republic

810 uS MI

812 uS IN

813 uS Fl

814 uS PA

815 uS Il

816 uS Mo

817 uS tX

818 uS CA

819 Canada Quebec

828 uS NC



830 uS tX

831 uS CA

832 uS tX

843 uS SC

845 uS NY

847 uS Il

848 uS NJ


850 uS Fl

856 uS NJ

857 uS MA

858 uS CA

859 uS KY

860 uS Ct

862 uS NJ

863 uS Fl

864 uS SC

865 uS tN

867 Canada Yukon, NW terr., Nunavut

868 trinidad & tobago trinidad & tobago

869 St. Kitts & Nevis St. Kitts & Nevis

870 uS AR

872 uS Il

876 Jamaica Jamaica

878 uS PA

901 uS tN

902 Canada Nova Scotia

903 uS tX

904 uS Fl

905 Canada ontario

906 uS MI

907 uS AK

908 uS NJ

909 uS CA

910 uS NC

912 uS gA

913 uS KS




914 uS NY

915 uS tX

916 uS CA

917 uS NY

918 uS oK

919 uS NC

920 uS WI

925 uS CA

928 uS AZ

931 uS tN

936 uS tX

937 uS oH

938 uS Al

939 uS Puerto Rico

940 uS tX

941 uS Fl

947 uS MI

949 uS CA

951 uS CA

952 uS MN

954 uS Fl

956 uS tX

970 uS Co

971 uS oR

972 uS tX

973 uS NJ

978 uS MA

979 uS tX

980 uS NC

985 uS lA

989 uS MI

note: All geographic npAs were in service as of December 31, 2010.


AttACHMeNt 4 – NoN-geogRAPHIC NPAS IN SeRVICe

the table below lists the non-geographic NPAs in service as of December 31, 2010, along with the service for which each is used.

npA Service

456 Inbound International

500 Personal Communications Service



600 Canadian Services

700 Interexchange Carrier Services

710 uS government

800 toll-Free

855 toll-Free

866 toll-Free

877 toll-Free

888 toll-Free

900 Premium Services

NPA code 456 allows callers to select a carrier for international calls terminating in a NANP country. Carriers implement this service by activating 456 numbers in each country of origin.

500, 533 and 544 numbers are intended to be used for personal communications services. Personal communications service is defined as a set of capabilities that allows some combination of personal mobility, terminal mobility and service profile management. the 544 NPA was introduced in December 2010. NPA codes 522, 566, 577 and 588 have been reserved as Personal Communications Services codes and will be assigned as needed.

NPA code 600 is used within Canada and assigned to Canadian telecommunications service providers for the provision of non-geographic services.

NPA code 700 was assigned in 1983 for use by all interexchange carriers. each carrier has the use of all 7.92 million numbers in the 700 NPA. When a call is made to a 700 number, the local exchange carrier passes the call to the caller’s interexchange carrier, selected either through presubscription or override. Note that 700 numbers, unlike other NANP numbers, may terminate in different ways, depending on how the interexchange carrier has allocated the numbers.

NPA code 710 was assigned in 1983 to the u.S. government for emergency services. the 710 NPA is treated as non-geographic with per-call compensation provided by the National Communications System (NCS).

NPA codes 800, 888, 877, 866 and 855 are used as toll free codes. the 855 NPA was introduced in october 2010. NPA codes 844, 833 and 822 have been assigned for use as toll free codes and will be introduced as needed.

900 numbers are used for premium services, with the cost of each 900 call billed to the calling party.


AttACHMeNt 5 – DIAlINg PlANS

location npA Home npA local Calls

Home npA toll Calls

Foreign npA local Calls

Foreign npA toll Calls

notes

AK 907 7D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Al 205 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Al 251 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 1

Al 256 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Al 334 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Al 938 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

AR 479 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

AR 501 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

AR 870 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

AS 684 7D NA NA 1+10D

AZ 480 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

AZ 520 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

AZ 602 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

AZ 623 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

AZ 928 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

CA 209 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 213 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 310 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 323 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 408 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 415 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 424 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 442 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 510 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 530 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 559 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 562 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 619 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 626 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 650 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 657 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 707 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 714 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 747 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 760 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 805 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 818 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 831 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D


DIAlINg PlANS


Home npA toll Calls



notes

CA 858 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 909 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 916 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 925 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 949 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CA 951 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

CNMI 670 7D 1+10D NA 1+10D

Co 303 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Co 719 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Co 720 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Co 970 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Ct 203 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Ct 475 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Ct 860 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

DC 202 7D NA 10D 1+10D

De 302 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 239 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 305 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 2

Fl 321 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 3

Fl 352 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 386 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 407 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 561 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 4

Fl 727 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 754 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 772 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 5

Fl 786 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 813 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 850 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 863 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 904 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 941 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Fl 954 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

gA 229 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

gA 404 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

gA 470 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

gA 478 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

gA 678 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D


DIAlINg PlANS


Home npA toll Calls



notes

gA 706 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

gA 762 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

gA 770 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

gA 912 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

gu 671 7D 1+10D NA 1+10D

HI 808 7D 1+10D NA 1+10D

IA 319 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

IA 515 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

IA 563 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

IA 641 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

IA 712 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

ID 208 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

Il 217 7D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 224 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 309 7D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 312 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 331 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 618 7D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 630 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 708 7D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 773 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 779 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 815 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 847 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

Il 872 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

IN 219 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

IN 260 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

IN 317 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

IN 574 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

IN 765 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

IN 812 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

KS 316 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

KS 620 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

KS 785 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

KS 913 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

KY 270 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

KY 502 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

KY 606 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 6


DIAlINg PlANS


Home npA toll Calls



notes

KY 859 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 6

lA 225 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

lA 318 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

lA 337 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

lA 504 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

lA 985 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MA 339 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MA 351 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MA 413 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MA 508 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MA 617 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MA 774 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MA 781 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MA 857 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MA 978 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MD 240 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MD 301 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MD 410 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MD 443 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Me 207 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

MI 231 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 248 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 269 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 313 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 517 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 586 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 616 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 734 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 810 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 906 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 947 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MI 989 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MN 218 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

MN 320 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

MN 507 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

MN 612 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MN 651 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MN 763 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D


DIAlINg PlANS


Home npA toll Calls



notes

MN 952 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Mo 314 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Mo 417 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Mo 573 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Mo 636 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Mo 660 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Mo 816 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MS 228 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MS 601 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MS 662 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

MS 769 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Mt 406 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

NC 252 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

NC 336 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

NC 704 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

NC 828 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

NC 910 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

NC 919 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

NC 980 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

ND 701 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

Ne 308 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

Ne 402 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

NH 603 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NJ 201 10D 10D 1+10D 1+10D 7

NJ 551 10D 10D 1+10D 1+10D 7

NJ 609 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NJ 732 10D 10D 1+10D 1+10D 8

NJ 848 10D 10D 1+10D 1+10D 8

NJ 856 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NJ 862 10D 10D 1+10D 1+10D 9

NJ 908 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NJ 973 10D 10D 1+10D 1+10D 9

NM 505 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

NM 575 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

NV 702 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

NV 775 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

NY 212 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 315 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D


DIAlINg PlANS


Home npA toll Calls



notes

NY 347 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 516 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 518 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 585 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 607 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 631 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 646 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 716 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 718 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 845 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 914 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

NY 917 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

oH 216 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 10

oH 234 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 10

oH 330 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 10

oH 419 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 10

oH 440 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 10

oH 513 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 10

oH 567 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 10

oH 614 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 10

oH 740 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 10

oH 937 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 10

oK 405 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

oK 580 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

oK 918 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

oR 458 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

oR 503 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

oR 541 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

oR 971 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

PA 215 10D 10D (see note) 1+10D 11

PA 267 10D 10D (see note) 1+10D 11

PA 412 10D 10D (see note) (see note) 12

PA 484 10D 10D (see note) 1+10D 11

PA 570 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

PA 610 10D 10D (see note) 1+10D 11

PA 717 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D


PA 814 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D


DIAlINg PlANS


Home npA toll Calls



notes


Puerto Rico 787 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Puerto Rico 939 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

RI 401 7D 7D 1+10D 1+10D

SC 803 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

SC 843 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

SC 864 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

SD 605 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

tN 423 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tN 615 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

tN 731 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D 13

tN 865 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tN 901 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tN 931 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

tX 210 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 214 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 254 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 281 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 325 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 361 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 409 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 430 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 432 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 469 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 512 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 682 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 713 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 806 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 817 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 830 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 832 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 903 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 915 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 936 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 940 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 956 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

tX 972 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D


DIAlINg PlANS


Home npA toll Calls



notes

tX 979 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

uSVI 340 7D 1+10D NA 1+10D

ut 385 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

ut 435 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

ut 801 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

VA 276 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

VA 434 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

VA 540 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

VA 571 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

VA 703 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

VA 757 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

VA 804 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

Vt 802 7D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

WA 206 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

WA 253 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

WA 360 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

WA 425 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

WA 509 7D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

WI 262 7D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

WI 414 7D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

WI 534 10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

WI 608 7D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

WI 715 10D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

WI 920 7D 1+10D 1+10D 1+10D

WV 304 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

WV 681 10D 1+10D 10D 1+10D

WY 307 7D 1+10D 7D 1+10D

notes: 1. other dialing plans may apply at the discretion of the local service provider.2. the Florida Keys retained 7D local dialing.3. Home NPA local calls are 7D in brevard County.4. See Planning letter 291 for local dialing into the 954-754 NPAs.5. All eCS calls directed to a presubscribed carrier will be dialed as 1+10D (Pl 311).6. Some cross-boundary 7D local dialing exists.7. Calls between the 551 and 201 NPAs may be dialed as 10D.8. Calls between the 732 and 848 NPAs may be dialed as 10D.9. Calls between the 973 and 862 NPAs can be dialed as 10D.10. Carriers must provide permissive 1+10D dialing for Foreign NPA local Calls in areas where they provide optional eAS.11. All calls within and between the 215, 267, 484, and 610 NPAs can be dialed as 10D or 1+10D. Calls to other NPAs must be dialed as 1+10D.12. All calls within and between NPAs 412, 724, and 878 can be dialed as 10D or 1+10D. Calls to other NPAs must be dialed as 1+10D.13. Note that some local calls may require dialing 10D or 1+10D depending on area and service provider.


AttACHMeNt 6 – 2010 NRuF AND NPA eXHAuSt ANAlYSIS

NANPA projects NPA exhaust on a semi-annual basis. these projections were produced in April and october 2010. the tables below show the current quarter/year in which each NPA is projected to exhaust, based on analysis performed in october 2010. the table also provides forecasted NPA exhaust information from previous exhaust projections developed by NANPA. the current forecast is based on NRuF data as it existed on october 1, 2010 for the uS and January 1, 2010 for Canada, except where noted. Forecasts marked “R” are based on rationed assignment limits. the change between the current and previous forecasts is given in quarters. A positive number indicates that the exhaust date has moved out to a later date. A negative number indicates that the exhaust is now projected to occur sooner than previously expected.

npA exhaust Forecasts Sorted by Area Code:

loCAtIon npA 2010.2 FCSt

2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes

Year R Qtr Year R Qtr Year R Qtr Year R Qtr Year R Qtr Year R Qtr2010.1

to 2010.2

New Jersey201/551 2049 2Q 2049 1Q 2043 1Q 2042 1Q 2042 1Q 2037 2Q +Q1

District of Columbia 202 2018 4Q 2019 4Q 2019 3Q 2020 1Q 2021 1Q 2022 4Q -4Q b

Connecticut 203/475 2010 2Q 2010 2Q 2010 2Q N/A o

Canada 204 2013 2Q 2016 4Q 2011 1Q 2021 4Q 2021 4Q c

Alabama 205 2014 4Q 2014 1Q 2013 3Q 2013 1Q 2012 4Q 2013 3Q +3Q a

Washington 206 2025 1Q 2023 3Q 2021 2Q 2020 4Q 2020 3Q 2023 2Q +6Q a

Maine 207 2016 3Q 2016 1Q 2015 2Q 2014 4Q 2014 4Q 2014 4Q +2Q

Idaho 208 2015 3Q 2015 1Q 2014 1Q 2013 2Q 2012 2Q 2012 1Q +2Q

California 209 2023 2Q 2023 1Q 2022 4Q 2022 3Q 2021 3Q 2021 3Q +1Q

texas 210 2018 2Q 2018 2Q 2017 2Q 2016 3Q 2015 3Q 2015 1Q N/C

New York 212/646 2016 2Q 2016 2Q 2015 2Q 2014 4Q 2014 2Q 2014 2Q N/C


texas 214/972/469 2021 3Q 2021 2Q 2019 3Q 2018 3Q 2018 1Q 2017 3Q +1Q

Pennsylvania 215/267 2015 4Q 2015 2Q 2014 3Q 2014 3Q 2014 3Q 2014 2Q +2Q

ohio 216 2039 2Q 2039 1Q 2032 4Q 2032 3Q 2027 4Q 2027 1Q +1Q

Illinois 217 2013 3Q 2013 2Q 2012 4Q 2012 2Q 2011 4Q 2011 2Q +1Q

Minnesota 218 2018 2Q 2017 4Q 2017 2Q 2017 1Q 2017 1Q 2017 1Q +2Q

Indiana 219 2032 2Q 2031 3Q 2031 2Q 2030 3Q 2030 3Q 2029 4Q +3Q a

louisiana 225 2031 3Q 2031 2Q 2029 4Q 2029 3Q 2029 1Q 2028 3Q +1Q

Mississippi 228 2046 1Q 2045 3Q 2042 1Q 2039 3Q 2039 1Q 2038 3Q +2Q

georgia 229 2018 4Q 2018 4Q 2015 2Q 2014 2Q 2013 1Q 2015 3Q N/C

Michigan 231 2032 1Q 2031 4Q 2031 4Q 2030 3Q 2026 2Q 2026 2Q +1Q

Florida 239 2031 2Q 2030 3Q 2030 4Q 2029 3Q 2029 2Q 2027 4Q +3Q a

Michigan 248/947 2042 2Q 2040 2Q 2037 3Q 2036 1Q 2035 3Q 2032 1Q +8Q a

Canada 250/778/604 2016 3Q 2019 4Q 2019 4Q 2018 4Q 2018 4Q c

Alabama 251 2033 4Q 2033 4Q 2029 2Q 2029 2Q 2028 3Q 2028 1Q N/C


2010 NRuF AND NPA eXHAuSt ANAlYSIS


2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2


texas 254 2024 1Q 2023 4Q 2022 4Q 2022 2Q 2021 1Q 2020 3Q +1Q

Alabama 256/938 2036 1Q 2035 2Q 2012 R 1Q 2011 R 3Q 2011 R 2Q 2010 R 4Q +3Q a

Indiana 260 2035 2Q 2034 4Q 2034 4Q 2032 3Q 2030 3Q 2030 2Q +2Q

Wisconsin 262 2026 2Q 2026 1Q 2026 1Q 2024 4Q 2023 1Q 2022 4Q +1Q


Kentucky 270 2014 3Q 2014 1Q 2012 4Q 2012 R 2Q 2011 R 2Q 2010 R 3Q +2Q

Virginia 276 2050 3Q 2050 2Q 2050 1Q 2049 4Q o

Canada 289/905 2014 1Q 2016 4Q 2028 3Q 2024 3Q 2014 3Q c

Maryland 301/240 2022 1Q 2021 4Q 2021 2Q 2022 3Q 2022 2Q 2021 3Q +1Q

Delaware 302 2026 2Q 2026 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 2Q 2025 1Q 2024 4Q N/C

Colorado 303/720 2021 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 4Q 2025 2Q 2025 2Q 2025 2Q -17Q a

West Virginia 304/681 2036 1Q 2035 4Q 2035 2Q 2035 1Q 2035 1Q 2009 1Q +1Q

Florida 305/786 2024 2Q 2023 4Q 2023 4Q 2022 4Q 2021 3Q 2020 4Q +2Q h

Florida 305A 2017 2Q 2016 3Q 2015 3Q 2012 4Q 2012 2Q 2011 2Q +3Q a, h

Canada 306 2018 2Q 2022 4Q 2022 4Q 2023 4Q 2023 4Q c

Wyoming 307 2029 3Q 2028 4Q 2026 3Q 2026 1Q 2026 1Q 2025 1Q +3Q a

Nebraska 308 2036 3Q 2035 2Q 2033 2Q 2033 2Q 2031 2Q 2030 4Q +5Q a

Illinois 309 2017 4Q 2017 1Q 2016 1Q 2015 2Q 2014 3Q 2013 4Q +3Q a

California 310/424 2041 3Q 2029 1Q 2026 3Q 2025 3Q 2023 2Q 2022 4Q +50Q b

Illinois 312/773/872 2030 1Q 2029 3Q 2029 2Q +2Q m


Missouri 314 2021 1Q 2020 3Q 2019 2Q 2018 1Q 2017 3Q 2017 4Q +2Q

New York 315 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 1Q 2012 1Q 2011 1Q N/C

Kansas 316 2046 3Q 2040 4Q 2040 2Q 2037 4Q 2037 3Q 2037 1Q +23Q a

Indiana 317 2017 1Q 2017 1Q 2015 4Q 2015 1Q 2014 1Q 2013 4Q N/C


Iowa 319 2023 1Q 2022 3Q 2021 2Q 2020 2Q 2018 4Q 2017 3Q +2Q

Minnesota 320 2027 1Q 2026 2Q 2025 1Q 2024 3Q 2024 3Q 2024 3Q +3Q a

Florida 321A 2033 2Q 2032 3Q 2032 1Q 2031 3Q 2031 2Q 2029 2Q +3Q a, g


texas 325 2035 3Q 2035 2Q 2033 3Q 2031 4Q 2029 2Q 2028 4Q +1Q

ohio 330/234 2032 2Q 2032 1Q 2031 4Q 2031 2Q 2031 1Q 2030 3Q +1Q

Alabama 334 2016 2Q 2015 4Q 2015 1Q 2014 2Q 2013 4Q 2013 4Q +2Q

North Carolina 336 2014 4Q 2014 3Q 2014 2Q 2014 2Q 2013 3Q 2013 1Q +1Q




2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2

Virgin Islands 340 2131 4Q 2131 2Q 2131 1Q o

Florida 352 2021 4Q 2021 2Q 2021 2Q 2020 4Q 2020 1Q 2019 3Q +2Q

Washington 360 2014 1Q 2013 3Q 2012 4Q 2012 2Q 2012 2Q 2011 4Q +2Q

texas 361 2022 2Q 2021 1Q 2018 4Q 2017 4Q 2016 3Q 2016 1Q +5Q a

Florida 386 2033 1Q 2032 3Q 2029 4Q 2029 3Q 2029 1Q 2028 3Q +2Q

Rhode Island 401 2023 3Q 2022 3Q 2021 3Q 2021 1Q 2019 4Q 2019 4Q +4Q

Nebraska 402/531 2011 4Q 2011 3Q 2011 2Q 2010 3Q 2010 2Q f, o, q

Canada 403/587/780 2020 1Q 2022 3Q 2022 3Q 2024 4Q 2024 4Q c


oklahoma 405 2017 4Q 2017 2Q 2017 2Q 2016 2Q 2015 4Q 2016 2Q +2Q

Montana 406 2016 2Q 2015 4Q 2015 1Q 2013 4Q 2012 4Q 2011 4Q +2Q

Florida 407/321 2013 4Q 2013 2Q 2013 1Q 2012 2Q 2011 3Q 2011 1Q +2Q g

California 408 2012 4Q 2012 4Q 2012 4Q 2012 2Q 2012 2Q 2012 1Q N/C

texas 409 2033 4Q 2034 1Q 2031 3Q 2029 4Q 2028 2Q 2028 3Q -1Q


Pennsylvania 412/878/724 2028 2Q 2027 3Q 2026 3Q 2026 2Q 2026 1Q 2025 4Q +3Q a

Massachusetts 413 2025 3Q 2024 4Q 2024 3Q 2024 1Q 2023 3Q 2021 3Q +3Q a

Wisconsin 414 2034 1Q 2033 1Q 2033 1Q 2032 3Q 2032 2Q 2032 1Q +4Q a


Canada 416/647 2015 3Q 2021 4Q 2021 4Q 2017 1Q 2017 1Q c


Canada 418/581 2008 4Q c

ohio 419/567 2026 3Q 2025 4Q 2025 3Q 2024 3Q 2023 1Q 2022 3Q +3Q a

tennessee 423 2018 4Q 2018 1Q 2018 1Q 2017 3Q 2017 1Q 2016 4Q +3Q a


texas 432 2038 4Q 2037 4Q 2037 1Q 2036 3Q 2033 1Q 2032 4Q +4Q a

Virginia 434 2037 1Q 2036 2Q 2035 4Q 2036 3Q 2036 3Q 2033 3Q +3Q a

utah 435 2033 3Q 2033 2Q 2031 2Q 2030 3Q 2030 2Q 2026 2Q +1Q

ohio 440 2021 3Q 2020 4Q 2020 2Q 2019 3Q 2018 1Q 2017 4Q +3Q a

Canada 450 2010 4Q 2010 4Q 2010 4Q 2012 3Q 2014 4Q c

georgia 478 2031 3Q 2031 1Q 2030 4Q 2030 2Q 2028 3Q 2029 2Q +2Q

Arkansas 479 2032 4Q 2032 2Q 2030 4Q 2029 1Q 2028 3Q 2028 2Q +2Q

Arizona 480 2022 2Q 2023 4Q 2023 1Q 2022 1Q 2021 3Q 2021 3Q -6Q b


Kentucky 502 2023 4Q 2023 2Q 2022 2Q 2021 1Q 2019 3Q 2018 3Q +2Q




2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2


New Mexico 505 2023 4Q 2023 3Q 2023 2Q 2023 1Q 2022 4Q 2009 1Q +1Q

Canada 506 2027 1Q 2027 1Q c

Minnesota 507 2015 3Q 2016 1Q 2015 3Q 2015 1Q 2014 1Q 2013 3Q -2Q

Massachusetts 508/774 2021 1Q 2020 3Q 2020 3Q 2020 1Q 2019 1Q 2018 1Q +2Q


California 510 2016 4Q 2015 R 1Q 2014 R 4Q 2014 R 2Q 2013 R 4Q 2013 R 3Q +7Q a

texas 512 2014 2Q 2014 2Q 2014 1Q 2012 3Q 2012 1Q 2012 1Q N/C

ohio 513 2020 2Q 2020 1Q 2020 1Q 2018 3Q 2017 3Q 2016 3Q +1Q

Canada 514/438 2029 3Q c

Iowa 515 2025 4Q 2025 4Q 2024 3Q 2024 1Q 2021 2Q 2019 4Q N/C

New York 516 2018 4Q 2018 3Q 2018 2Q 2017 3Q 2016 3Q 2015 4Q +1Q


New York 518 2016 4Q 2016 1Q 2015 3Q 2015 1Q 2014 3Q 2013 3Q +3Q

Canada 519/226 2021 2Q 2019 2Q 2019 2Q 2019 2Q 2019 2Q c

Arizona 520 2029 3Q 2029 1Q 2027 3Q 2027 2Q 2025 4Q 2025 3Q +2Q


Virginia 540 2017 3Q 2017 1Q 2016 4Q 2017 3Q 2017 3Q 2017 3Q +2Q

oregon 541/458 2033 3Q 2032 4Q 2031 1Q 2010 2Q 2010 4Q 2011 1Q +3Q

California 559 2019 2Q 2019 R 1Q 2018 R 4Q 2018 R 2Q 2017 R 3Q 2017 R 1Q +1Q

Florida 561 2022 4Q 2022 2Q 2022 1Q 2021 3Q 2021 2Q 2019 3Q +2Q

California 562 2027 2Q 2026 3Q 2023 4Q 2023 2Q 2022 1Q 2021 3Q +3Q a

Iowa 563 2036 1Q 2035 4Q 2034 1Q 2031 1Q 2028 3Q 2027 4Q +1Q

Pennsylvania 570 2012 3Q 2011 3Q 2011 3Q 2011 3Q 2012 2Q 2011 4Q +4Q a

Missouri 573 2018 1Q 2017 2Q 2016 3Q 2015 2Q 2013 4Q 2012 3Q +3Q a


New Mexico 575 2028 2Q 2027 4Q 2027 3Q 2027 3Q 2027 2Q +2Q

oklahoma 580 2017 2Q 2016 3Q 2015 2Q 2014 4Q 2013 4Q 2012 3Q +3Q a

New York 585 2024 2Q 2024 1Q 2023 2Q 2022 4Q 2020 1Q 2019 1Q +1Q

Michigan 586 2032 4Q 2031 3Q 2031 3Q 2031 3Q 2027 4Q 2026 4Q +5Q a

Mississippi 601/769 2034 4Q 2034 3Q 2034 2Q 2033 4Q 2033 2Q 2032 4Q +1Q

Arizona 602 2025 3Q 2024 4Q 2023 2Q 2021 4Q 2019 4Q 2019 4Q +3Q a

New Hampshire 603 2013 2Q 2012 3Q 2012 2Q 2011 4Q 2011 2Q 2011 1Q +3Q a

South Dakota 605 2019 4Q 2019 3Q 2018 4Q 2018 1Q 2016 3Q 2015 4Q +1Q

Kentucky 606 2023 4Q 2023 1Q 2021 2Q 2020 4Q 2019 4Q 2018 4Q +3Q a




2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2


New Jersey 609 2014 3Q 2014 2Q 2013 4Q 2013 3Q 2013 2Q 2013 2Q +1Q



Canada 613/343 2011 1Q 2011 4Q 2011 3Q c

ohio 614 2019 2Q 2018 4Q 2018 1Q 2017 1Q 2017 1Q 2016 1Q +2Q

tennessee 615 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 3Q 2013 2Q N/C

Michigan 616 2027 3Q 2027 3Q 2027 2Q 2026 4Q 2026 2Q 2024 1Q N/C




Kansas 620 2019 4Q 2018 1Q 2017 2Q 2015 4Q 2015 4Q 2015 4Q +7Q a

Arizona 623 2042 4Q 2042 3Q 2040 1Q 2039 3Q 2036 3Q 2036 2Q +1Q


Illinois 630/331 2036 4Q 2036 3Q 2036 2Q 2035 2Q 2035 2Q 2035 1Q +1Q

New York 631 2015 2Q 2014 4Q 2014 2Q 2014 1Q 2013 4Q 2012 4Q +2Q


Iowa 641 2025 3Q 2024 1Q 2023 2Q 2021 2Q 2020 2Q 2018 3Q +2Q






CNMI 670 2322 3Q 2322 4Q 2322 2Q o

guam 671 2202 4Q 2299 4Q 2299 2Q o

American Samoa 684 2076 3Q 2076 3Q 2076 3Q o

North Dakota 701 2016 1Q 2015 1Q 2014 3Q 2013 4Q 2013 2Q 2013 2Q +4Q a

Nevada 702 2015 3Q 2015 1Q 2014 4Q 2014 1Q 2013 3Q 2013 2Q +2Q

Virginia 703/571 2024 4Q 2024 2Q 2024 1Q 2023 4Q 2023 3Q 2023 1Q +2Q

North Carolina 704/980 2028 4Q 2028 2Q 2027 1Q 2026 3Q 2026 2Q 2025 3Q +2Q

Canada 705 2011 4Q 2011 4Q 2012 4Q 2015 1Q 2014 3Q c

georgia 706/762 2028 4Q 2028 2Q 2028 2Q 2027 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 1Q +2Q



Canada 709 2030 3Q 2030 3Q 2028 1Q 2028 1Q c




2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2

texas 713/281/832 2014 4Q 2014 3Q 2014 1Q 2013 3Q 2013 2Q 2013 1Q +1Q

California 714/657 2039 4Q 2039 3Q 2039 2Q 2038 4Q 2038 3Q 2008 2Q +1Q

Wisconsin 715/534 2039 2Q 2039 2Q 2011 4Q 2011 3Q 2011 3Q 2011 1Q N/C

New York 716 2019 3Q 2019 2Q 2018 3Q 2018 2Q 2017 2Q 2015 4Q +1Q


New York 718/347 2011 3Q 2012 2Q 2012 2Q 2011 4Q 2011 4Q 2011 4Q -3Q b

Colorado 719 2025 1Q 2024 3Q 2023 3Q 2023 1Q 2022 4Q 2021 2Q +2Q

Florida 727 2033 3Q 2033 1Q 2029 3Q 2027 4Q 2027 2Q 2026 4Q +2Q

tennessee 731 2034 1Q 2033 3Q 2030 3Q 2027 4Q 2026 1Q 2024 3Q +2Q

New Jersey 732/848 2033 4Q 2032 3Q 2032 1Q 2031 2Q 2031 1Q 2029 2Q +5Q a


ohio 740 2013 3Q 2013 1Q 2012 3Q 2012 1Q 2011 3Q 2011 2Q +2Q


California 760/442 2038 1Q 2037 4Q 2037 3Q 2009 4Q 2009 R 4Q 2009 R 3Q +1Q


Indiana 765 2018 3Q 2018 2Q 2017 4Q 2017 1Q 2015 3Q 2015 1Q +1Q

georgia 770/678/470 2026 4Q 2026 3Q 2025 4Q 2025 1Q 2024 4Q 2023 1Q +1Q

Florida 772 2040 1Q 2039 4Q 2037 4Q 2037 2Q 2036 4Q 2034 3Q +1Q

Nevada 775 2029 1Q 2028 4Q 2027 2Q 2026 4Q 2024 2Q 2022 4Q +1Q

Massachusetts 781/339 2037 3Q 2036 4Q 2035 2Q 2034 4Q 2033 2Q 2031 1Q +3Q a

Kansas 785 2017 1Q 2016 1Q 2015 2Q 2014 1Q 2015 1Q 2016 1Q +4Q a

Puerto Rico 787/939 2028 2Q 2027 3Q 2027 3Q 2027 1Q 2027 1Q 2026 3Q +3Q a

utah 801/385 2037 2Q 2035 4Q 2034 4Q 2034 4Q 2009 2Q 2009 2Q +6Q a

Vermont 802 2020 1Q 2019 3Q 2018 3Q 2018 3Q 2018 3Q 2016 3Q +2Q

South Carolina 803 2014 4Q 2014 2Q 2014 2Q 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 3Q +2Q



texas 806 2017 4Q 2017 3Q 2017 4Q 2017 2Q 2017 1Q 2017 2Q +1Q

Canada 807 c

Hawaii 808 2026 4Q 2024 4Q 2023 4Q 2023 2Q 2023 1Q 2021 3Q +8Q a



Florida 813 2019 4Q 2019 3Q 2018 4Q 2018 2Q 2018 1Q 2018 1Q +1Q






2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2

texas 817/682 2037 2Q 2035 4Q 2034 3Q 2033 1Q 2028 1Q 2027 3Q +6Q a


Canada 819 2014 1Q 2015 1Q 2015 1Q 2017 3Q 2017 3Q c

North Carolina 828 2020 1Q 2019 2Q 2018 2Q 2017 3Q 2015 4Q 2015 2Q +3Q a

texas 830 2024 4Q 2023 1Q 2022 1Q 2021 1Q 2019 4Q 2018 4Q +7Q a



New York 845 2018 3Q 2018 1Q 2017 2Q 2017 1Q 2016 1Q 2015 3Q +2Q


Florida 850 2014 4Q 2014 3Q 2014 2Q 2013 3Q 2013 1Q 2013 1Q +1Q




Connecticut 860 2012 3Q 2012 2Q 2012 1Q 2011 2Q 2011 2Q 2010 4Q +1Q




Canada 867 c

Arkansas 870 2015 1Q 2014 1Q 2013 3Q 2011 4Q 2011 2Q 2010 4Q +4Q a


Canada 902 2018 1Q 2019 2Q 2019 2Q 2018 4Q 2018 4Q c

texas 903/430 2028 1Q 2027 1Q 2026 2Q 2025 4Q 2025 4Q 2025 2Q +4Q a



Alaska 907 2016 4Q 2015 3Q 2015 1Q 2013 3Q 2012 3Q 2013 1Q +5Q a

New Jersey 908 2021 4Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2018 1Q 2017 3Q 2017 2Q +8Q a



georgia 912 2021 2Q 2020 2Q 2019 4Q 2019 2Q 2018 4Q 2020 3Q +4Q a

Kansas 913 2035 2Q 2034 3Q 2033 2Q 2031 4Q 2030 1Q 2029 4Q +3Q

New York 914 2020 4Q 2019 4Q 2019 3Q 2018 3Q 2018 3Q 2018 1Q +4Q a

texas 915 2035 4Q 2035 3Q 2033 2Q 2032 1Q 2031 4Q 2031 2Q +1Q


New York 917 e

oklahoma 918/539 2012 4Q 2012 2Q 2011 4Q 2011 4Q 2011 1Q +175Q f, o, r




2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2





texas 936 2037 2Q 2036 3Q 2036 3Q 2036 1Q 2032 1Q 2028 4Q +3Q a

ohio 937 2015 4Q 2015 3Q 2014 4Q 2013 4Q 2012 3Q 2012 2Q +1Q

texas 940 2033 1Q 2032 3Q 2031 4Q 2030 3Q 2028 1Q 2026 4Q +2Q

Florida 941 2031 2Q 2030 4Q 2030 3Q 2029 3Q 2029 3Q 2028 4Q +2Q




Florida 954/754 2036 1Q 2035 3Q 2035 2Q 2034 4Q 2034 3Q 2032 1Q +2Q

texas 956 2020 1Q 2019 3Q 2018 3Q 2017 3Q 2016 2Q 2016 2Q +2Q


New Jersey 973/862 2025 3Q 2025 1Q 2024 4Q 2024 1Q 2023 4Q 2023 4Q +2Q


texas 979 2034 2Q 2033 4Q 2033 4Q 2032 1Q 2030 2Q 2029 4Q +2Q





npA exhaust Forecasts Sorted by location:


2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2

Alabama205 2014 4Q 2014 1Q 2013 3Q 2013 1Q 2012 4Q 2013 3Q +3Q a

Alabama 251 2033 4Q 2033 4Q 2029 2Q 2029 2Q 2028 3Q 2028 1Q N/C

Alabama 334 2016 2Q 2015 4Q 2015 1Q 2014 2Q 2013 4Q 2013 4Q +2Q

Alabama 256/938 2036 1Q 2035 2Q 2012 R 1Q 2011 R 3Q 2011 R 2Q 2010 R 4Q +3Q a

Alaska 907 2016 4Q 2015 3Q 2015 1Q 2013 3Q 2012 3Q 2013 1Q +5Q a

American Samoa 684 2076 3Q 2076 3Q 2076 3Q o

Arizona 480 2022 2Q 2023 4Q 2023 1Q 2022 1Q 2021 3Q 2021 3Q -6Q b

Arizona 520 2029 3Q 2029 1Q 2027 3Q 2027 2Q 2025 4Q 2025 3Q +2Q


Arizona 623 2042 4Q 2042 3Q 2040 1Q 2039 3Q 2036 3Q 2036 2Q +1Q




Arkansas 870 2015 1Q 2014 1Q 2013 3Q 2011 4Q 2011 2Q 2010 4Q +4Q a



California 310/424 2041 3Q 2029 1Q 2026 3Q 2025 3Q 2023 2Q 2022 4Q +50Q b


California 408 2012 4Q 2012 4Q 2012 4Q 2012 2Q 2012 2Q 2012 1Q N/C


California 510 2016 4Q 2015 R 1Q 2014 R 4Q 2014 R 2Q 2013 R 4Q 2013 R 3Q +7Q a










California 760/442 2038 1Q 2037 4Q 2037 3Q 2009 4Q 2009 R 4Q 2009 R 3Q +1Q





2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2








Canada 204 2013 2Q 2016 4Q 2011 1Q 2021 4Q 2021 4Q c

Canada 250/778/604 2016 3Q 2019 4Q 2019 4Q 2018 4Q 2018 4Q c

Canada 289/905 2014 1Q 2016 4Q 2028 3Q 2024 3Q 2014 3Q c

Canada 306 2018 2Q 2022 4Q 2022 4Q 2023 4Q 2023 4Q c

Canada 403/587/780 2020 1Q 2022 3Q 2022 3Q 2024 4Q 2024 4Q c

Canada 416/647 2015 3Q 2021 4Q 2021 4Q 2017 1Q 2017 1Q c

Canada 418/581 2008 4Q c

Canada 450 2010 4Q 2010 4Q 2010 4Q 2012 3Q 2014 4Q c

Canada 506 2027 1Q 2027 1Q c

Canada 514/438 2029 3Q c

Canada 519/226 2021 2Q 2019 2Q 2019 2Q 2019 2Q 2019 2Q c

Canada 613/343 2011 1Q 2011 4Q 2011 3Q c

Canada 705 2011 4Q 2011 4Q 2012 4Q 2015 1Q 2014 3Q c

Canada 709 2030 3Q 2030 3Q 2028 1Q 2028 1Q c

Canada 807 c

Canada 819 2014 1Q 2015 1Q 2015 1Q 2017 3Q 2017 3Q c

Canada 867 c

Canada 902 2018 1Q 2019 2Q 2019 2Q 2018 4Q 2018 4Q c

CNMI 670 2322 3Q 2322 4Q 2322 2Q o

Colorado 303/720 2021 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 4Q 2025 2Q 2025 2Q 2025 2Q -17Q a



Connecticut 203/475 2010 2Q 2010 2Q 2010 2Q N/A o

Connecticut 860 2012 3Q 2012 2Q 2012 1Q 2011 2Q 2011 2Q 2010 4Q +1Q

Delaware 302 2026 2Q 2026 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 2Q 2025 1Q 2024 4Q N/C

District of Columbia 202 2018 4Q 2019 4Q 2019 3Q 2020 1Q 2021 1Q 2022 4Q -4Q b


Florida 305/786 2024 2Q 2023 4Q 2023 4Q 2022 4Q 2021 3Q 2020 4Q +2Q h




2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2

Florida 321A 2033 2Q 2032 3Q 2032 1Q 2031 3Q 2031 2Q 2029 2Q +3Q a, g

Florida 352 2021 4Q 2021 2Q 2021 2Q 2020 4Q 2020 1Q 2019 3Q +2Q

Florida 386 2033 1Q 2032 3Q 2029 4Q 2029 3Q 2029 1Q 2028 3Q +2Q

Florida 407/321 2013 4Q 2013 2Q 2013 1Q 2012 2Q 2011 3Q 2011 1Q +2Q g

Florida 561 2022 4Q 2022 2Q 2022 1Q 2021 3Q 2021 2Q 2019 3Q +2Q

Florida 727 2033 3Q 2033 1Q 2029 3Q 2027 4Q 2027 2Q 2026 4Q +2Q

Florida 772 2040 1Q 2039 4Q 2037 4Q 2037 2Q 2036 4Q 2034 3Q +1Q

Florida 813 2019 4Q 2019 3Q 2018 4Q 2018 2Q 2018 1Q 2018 1Q +1Q

Florida 850 2014 4Q 2014 3Q 2014 2Q 2013 3Q 2013 1Q 2013 1Q +1Q



Florida 941 2031 2Q 2030 4Q 2030 3Q 2029 3Q 2029 3Q 2028 4Q +2Q

Florida 954/754 2036 1Q 2035 3Q 2035 2Q 2034 4Q 2034 3Q 2032 1Q +2Q



georgia 478 2031 3Q 2031 1Q 2030 4Q 2030 2Q 2028 3Q 2029 2Q +2Q

georgia 706/762 2028 4Q 2028 2Q 2028 2Q 2027 2Q 2025 3Q 2025 1Q +2Q

georgia 770/678/470 2026 4Q 2026 3Q 2025 4Q 2025 1Q 2024 4Q 2023 1Q +1Q

georgia 912 2021 2Q 2020 2Q 2019 4Q 2019 2Q 2018 4Q 2020 3Q +4Q a

guam 671 2202 4Q 2299 4Q 2299 2Q o

Hawaii 808 2026 4Q 2024 4Q 2023 4Q 2023 2Q 2023 1Q 2021 3Q +8Q a

Idaho 208 2015 3Q 2015 1Q 2014 1Q 2013 2Q 2012 2Q 2012 1Q +2Q


Illinois 309 2017 4Q 2017 1Q 2016 1Q 2015 2Q 2014 3Q 2013 4Q +3Q a

Illinois 312/773/872 2030 1Q 2029 3Q 2029 2Q +2Q m







Indiana 260 2035 2Q 2034 4Q 2034 4Q 2032 3Q 2030 3Q 2030 2Q +2Q

Indiana 317 2017 1Q 2017 1Q 2015 4Q 2015 1Q 2014 1Q 2013 4Q N/C


Indiana 765 2018 3Q 2018 2Q 2017 4Q 2017 1Q 2015 3Q 2015 1Q +1Q




2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2

Iowa 319 2023 1Q 2022 3Q 2021 2Q 2020 2Q 2018 4Q 2017 3Q +2Q

Iowa 515 2025 4Q 2025 4Q 2024 3Q 2024 1Q 2021 2Q 2019 4Q N/C

Iowa 563 2036 1Q 2035 4Q 2034 1Q 2031 1Q 2028 3Q 2027 4Q +1Q

Iowa 641 2025 3Q 2024 1Q 2023 2Q 2021 2Q 2020 2Q 2018 3Q +2Q

Iowa 712 2023 4Q 2022 4Q 2022 3Q 2021 3Q 2020 3Q 2019 3Q +4Q a

Kansas 316 2046 3Q 2040 4Q 2040 2Q 2037 4Q 2037 3Q 2037 1Q +23Q a

Kansas 620 2019 4Q 2018 1Q 2017 2Q 2015 4Q 2015 4Q 2015 4Q +7Q a

Kansas 785 2017 1Q 2016 1Q 2015 2Q 2014 1Q 2015 1Q 2016 1Q +4Q a

Kansas 913 2035 2Q 2034 3Q 2033 2Q 2031 4Q 2030 1Q 2029 4Q +3Q

Kentucky 270 2014 3Q 2014 1Q 2012 4Q 2012 R 2Q 2011 R 2Q 2010 R 3Q +2Q

Kentucky 502 2023 4Q 2023 2Q 2022 2Q 2021 1Q 2019 3Q 2018 3Q +2Q








Maine 207 2016 3Q 2016 1Q 2015 2Q 2014 4Q 2014 4Q 2014 4Q +2Q



Massachusetts 413 2025 3Q 2024 4Q 2024 3Q 2024 1Q 2023 3Q 2021 3Q +3Q a



Massachusetts 781/339 2037 3Q 2036 4Q 2035 2Q 2034 4Q 2033 2Q 2031 1Q +3Q a



Michigan 248/947 2042 2Q 2040 2Q 2037 3Q 2036 1Q 2035 3Q 2032 1Q +8Q a





Michigan 616 2027 3Q 2027 3Q 2027 2Q 2026 4Q 2026 2Q 2024 1Q N/C






2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2




Minnesota 507 2015 3Q 2016 1Q 2015 3Q 2015 1Q 2014 1Q 2013 3Q -2Q






Mississippi 601/769 2034 4Q 2034 3Q 2034 2Q 2033 4Q 2033 2Q 2032 4Q +1Q








Montana 406 2016 2Q 2015 4Q 2015 1Q 2013 4Q 2012 4Q 2011 4Q +2Q

Nebraska 308 2036 3Q 2035 2Q 2033 2Q 2033 2Q 2031 2Q 2030 4Q +5Q a

Nebraska 402/531 2011 4Q 2011 3Q 2011 2Q 2010 3Q 2010 2Q f, o, q

Nevada 702 2015 3Q 2015 1Q 2014 4Q 2014 1Q 2013 3Q 2013 2Q +2Q

Nevada 775 2029 1Q 2028 4Q 2027 2Q 2026 4Q 2024 2Q 2022 4Q +1Q

New Hampshire 603 2013 2Q 2012 3Q 2012 2Q 2011 4Q 2011 2Q 2011 1Q +3Q a

New Jersey 201/551 2049 2Q 2049 1Q 2043 1Q 2042 1Q 2042 1Q 2037 2Q +Q1


New Jersey 732/848 2033 4Q 2032 3Q 2032 1Q 2031 2Q 2031 1Q 2029 2Q +5Q a


New Jersey 908 2021 4Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2018 1Q 2017 3Q 2017 2Q +8Q a

New Jersey 973/862 2025 3Q 2025 1Q 2024 4Q 2024 1Q 2023 4Q 2023 4Q +2Q

New Mexico 505 2023 4Q 2023 3Q 2023 2Q 2023 1Q 2022 4Q 2009 1Q +1Q

New Mexico 575 2028 2Q 2027 4Q 2027 3Q 2027 3Q 2027 2Q +2Q

New York 212/646 2016 2Q 2016 2Q 2015 2Q 2014 4Q 2014 2Q 2014 2Q N/C

New York 315 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 1Q 2012 1Q 2011 1Q N/C

New York 516 2018 4Q 2018 3Q 2018 2Q 2017 3Q 2016 3Q 2015 4Q +1Q

New York 518 2016 4Q 2016 1Q 2015 3Q 2015 1Q 2014 3Q 2013 3Q +3Q




2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2

New York 607 2029 2Q 2028 4Q 2026 1Q 2025 4Q 2023 1Q 2020 3Q +2Q

New York 631 2015 2Q 2014 4Q 2014 2Q 2014 1Q 2013 4Q 2012 4Q +2Q

New York 716 2019 3Q 2019 2Q 2018 3Q 2018 2Q 2017 2Q 2015 4Q +1Q

New York 718/347 2011 3Q 2012 2Q 2012 2Q 2011 4Q 2011 4Q 2011 4Q -3Q b

New York 845 2018 3Q 2018 1Q 2017 2Q 2017 1Q 2016 1Q 2015 3Q +2Q

New York 914 2020 4Q 2019 4Q 2019 3Q 2018 3Q 2018 3Q 2018 1Q +4Q a

New York 917 e



North Carolina 704/980 2028 4Q 2028 2Q 2027 1Q 2026 3Q 2026 2Q 2025 3Q +2Q



North Carolina 919/984 2043 3Q 2041 3Q 2041 3Q 2041 1Q 2040 3Q 2040 3Q +8Q a, p

North Dakota 701 2016 1Q 2015 1Q 2014 3Q 2013 4Q 2013 2Q 2013 2Q +4Q a

ohio 216 2039 2Q 2039 1Q 2032 4Q 2032 3Q 2027 4Q 2027 1Q +1Q

ohio 330/234 2032 2Q 2032 1Q 2031 4Q 2031 2Q 2031 1Q 2030 3Q +1Q

ohio 419/567 2026 3Q 2025 4Q 2025 3Q 2024 3Q 2023 1Q 2022 3Q +3Q a

ohio 440 2021 3Q 2020 4Q 2020 2Q 2019 3Q 2018 1Q 2017 4Q +3Q a

ohio 513 2020 2Q 2020 1Q 2020 1Q 2018 3Q 2017 3Q 2016 3Q +1Q

ohio 614 2019 2Q 2018 4Q 2018 1Q 2017 1Q 2017 1Q 2016 1Q +2Q

ohio 740 2013 3Q 2013 1Q 2012 3Q 2012 1Q 2011 3Q 2011 2Q +2Q

ohio 937 2015 4Q 2015 3Q 2014 4Q 2013 4Q 2012 3Q 2012 2Q +1Q

oklahoma 405 2017 4Q 2017 2Q 2017 2Q 2016 2Q 2015 4Q 2016 2Q +2Q

oklahoma 580 2017 2Q 2016 3Q 2015 2Q 2014 4Q 2013 4Q 2012 3Q +3Q a

oklahoma 918/539 2012 4Q 2012 2Q 2011 4Q 2011 4Q 2011 1Q +175Q f, o, r

oregon 503/971 2035 2Q 2034 2Q 2034 2Q 2034 2Q 2033 4Q 2032 2Q +4Q a, j

oregon 541/458 2033 3Q 2032 4Q 2031 1Q 2010 2Q 2010 4Q 2011 1Q +3Q


Pennsylvania 412/878/724 2028 2Q 2027 3Q 2026 3Q 2026 2Q 2026 1Q 2025 4Q +3Q a





Puerto Rico 787/939 2028 2Q 2027 3Q 2027 3Q 2027 1Q 2027 1Q 2026 3Q +3Q a

Rhode Island 401 2023 3Q 2022 3Q 2021 3Q 2021 1Q 2019 4Q 2019 4Q +4Q




2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2



South Dakota 605 2019 4Q 2019 3Q 2018 4Q 2018 1Q 2016 3Q 2015 4Q +1Q

tennessee 423 2018 4Q 2018 1Q 2018 1Q 2017 3Q 2017 1Q 2016 4Q +3Q a

tennessee 615 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 4Q 2013 3Q 2013 2Q N/C





texas 210 2018 2Q 2018 2Q 2017 2Q 2016 3Q 2015 3Q 2015 1Q N/C

texas 214/972/469 2021 3Q 2021 2Q 2019 3Q 2018 3Q 2018 1Q 2017 3Q +1Q

texas 254 2024 1Q 2023 4Q 2022 4Q 2022 2Q 2021 1Q 2020 3Q +1Q

texas 325 2035 3Q 2035 2Q 2033 3Q 2031 4Q 2029 2Q 2028 4Q +1Q

texas 361 2022 2Q 2021 1Q 2018 4Q 2017 4Q 2016 3Q 2016 1Q +5Q a

texas 409 2033 4Q 2034 1Q 2031 3Q 2029 4Q 2028 2Q 2028 3Q -1Q

texas 432 2038 4Q 2037 4Q 2037 1Q 2036 3Q 2033 1Q 2032 4Q +4Q a

texas 512 2014 2Q 2014 2Q 2014 1Q 2012 3Q 2012 1Q 2012 1Q N/C

texas 713/281/832 2014 4Q 2014 3Q 2014 1Q 2013 3Q 2013 2Q 2013 1Q +1Q

texas 806 2017 4Q 2017 3Q 2017 4Q 2017 2Q 2017 1Q 2017 2Q +1Q

texas 817/682 2037 2Q 2035 4Q 2034 3Q 2033 1Q 2028 1Q 2027 3Q +6Q a

texas 830 2024 4Q 2023 1Q 2022 1Q 2021 1Q 2019 4Q 2018 4Q +7Q a

texas 903/430 2028 1Q 2027 1Q 2026 2Q 2025 4Q 2025 4Q 2025 2Q +4Q a

texas 915 2035 4Q 2035 3Q 2033 2Q 2032 1Q 2031 4Q 2031 2Q +1Q

texas 936 2037 2Q 2036 3Q 2036 3Q 2036 1Q 2032 1Q 2028 4Q +3Q a

texas 940 2033 1Q 2032 3Q 2031 4Q 2030 3Q 2028 1Q 2026 4Q +2Q

texas 956 2020 1Q 2019 3Q 2018 3Q 2017 3Q 2016 2Q 2016 2Q +2Q

texas 979 2034 2Q 2033 4Q 2033 4Q 2032 1Q 2030 2Q 2029 4Q +2Q

utah 435 2033 3Q 2033 2Q 2031 2Q 2030 3Q 2030 2Q 2026 2Q +1Q

utah 801/385 2037 2Q 2035 4Q 2034 4Q 2034 4Q 2009 2Q 2009 2Q +6Q a

Vermont 802 2020 1Q 2019 3Q 2018 3Q 2018 3Q 2018 3Q 2016 3Q +2Q

Virgin Islands 340 2131 4Q 2131 2Q 2131 1Q o

Virginia 276 2050 3Q 2050 2Q 2050 1Q 2049 4Q o

Virginia 434 2037 1Q 2036 2Q 2035 4Q 2036 3Q 2036 3Q 2033 3Q +3Q a


Virginia 703/571 2024 4Q 2024 2Q 2024 1Q 2023 4Q 2023 3Q 2023 1Q +2Q




2010.1 FCSt

2009.2 FCSt

2009.1 FCSt

2008.2 FCSt

2008.1 FCSt

Change notes


to 2010.2







West Virginia 304/681 2036 1Q 2035 4Q 2035 2Q 2035 1Q 2035 1Q 2009 1Q +1Q


Wisconsin 414 2034 1Q 2033 1Q 2033 1Q 2032 3Q 2032 2Q 2032 1Q +4Q a


Wisconsin 715/534 2039 2Q 2039 2Q 2011 4Q 2011 3Q 2011 3Q 2011 1Q N/C


Wyoming 307 2029 3Q 2028 4Q 2026 3Q 2026 1Q 2026 1Q 2025 1Q +3Q a

notes: a. Reduced historical and projected demand.b. Increased historical and projected demand.c. Forecast based upon information provided by the Canadian Numbering Administration (CNA).

the CNA normally provides only one projection per year. Change is from last forecast provided.d. Canadian NPA. With an exhaust date beyond 2032, there is no exhaust date provided.e. NPA is at exhaust. No codes available except for returns.f. New NPA added.g. Area Code 321A includes only brevard County Florida; 407/321 includes the Counties around orlando in Central Floridah. Area Code 305A includes only the Keys area of Florida; Area Code 305/786 is the Miami-Dade area of Florida.i. “Intentionally left blank.”j. Area Code 503A has been combined into overlay Complex 503/971.k. Reflects Delta NRuF forecast.l. the “R” refers to the forecast projection made at the published ration level alone.m. New NPA overlay complex in Illinois; 872 overlays 312 and 773; 773 and 312 are not overlaying each other.n. “Intentionally left blank.”o. exhaust beyond 40 years.p. exhaust of NPA 919 alone is 3Q2012.q. exhaust of NPA 402 alone is 2Q2012.r. exhaust of NPA 918 alone is 3Q2013.


AttACHMeNt 7 – 2010 NANP eXHAuSt ANAlYSIS

IntroductionNANPA projects the exhaust of the NANP based upon the utilization and forecast data submitted by carriers via the NRuF process. the following assumptions were used in this exhaust analysis, which was published in october 2010.

october 2010 nAnp exhaust projection Assumptionsthe following is a list of assumptions used in the development of the october 2010 NANP exhaust projection prepared by NANPA. these are the same assumptions used in previous NANP exhaust studies.

1. the NANP exhaust study uses as its basis the Co code demand, which includes service provider and Pooling Administrator forecasts, historical Co code assignments and other NPA-specific information, calculated for each respective NPA. the monthly Co code demand as calculated in the NPA exhaust analysis is straight-lined to determine demand outside the five-year time frame included in NRuF submissions.

2. For NPAs in rationing, NANPA compared the actual Co code demand over the past year(s) with the rationed amount. In addition, NANPA compared the forecasted Co code demand provided by service providers and/or the Pooling Administrator to the rationed amount. based upon this analysis, NANPA identified an average annual Co code demand rate for the NPA.

3. A new NPA will be required when the number of assigned and unavailable Co codes reaches 800.

4. It is assumed that each new NPA will require the same number of unassignable codes as the current NPA. It appears that most of the unassignable codes in the existing NPAs are duplicated in the new NPA. there are also times when additional codes in the new NPA are marked unassignable.

5. No assumptions were made with regard to the relief method implemented (i.e., NPA split vs. overlay). However, it was assumed that the selected relief method did not require the duplication or protection of central office codes above those identified in number 4 above.

6. the Co code demand for an exhausting NPA will be continued after relief. by doing so, the demand for both the existing and new NPAs will be taken into account for the geographic area covered by the original NPA.

7. the total quantity of available NPA codes will be 685 NPAs. this figure is derived as follows: 800 NPAs less NPAs reserved for NANP expansion (80), N11 codes (8), 555 and 950 NPAs (2), toll-free NPAs (12)1 and non-geographic NPAs (11).2

8. to account for the variability of demand, a sensitivity analysis was performed to the Co code demand (i.e., demand will be increased and decreased by increments of 10%) to understand the impact on NANP exhaust.

Results based on Assumptions As recognized in previous NANP exhaust analyses, the model is sensitive to the yearly Co code demand rate. using the monthly Co code demand for each NPA as calculated in the october 2010 NPA exhaust Analysis, and straight-lining this demand beyond the five-year time frame included in NRuF submissions, creates an average yearly demand rate of 6,100 Co codes. this yearly demand rate was compared with demand rates in 2003 through 2009.

Year Annual Gross Co Code Demand

Annual net Co Code Demand

2003 3,200 1,400

2004 3,100 2,100

2005 3,300 2,300

2006 4,100 3,400

2007 3,200 2,900

2008 2,900 2,200

2009 2,100 1,600

2010 (Annualized) 2,800 2,500

In order to provide a NANP exhaust analysis more reflective of the current industry trend in terms of yearly Co code demand, NANPA selected a base case with an average annual demand of 5,500 Co codes.3 this represents approximately a 10% reduction in the annual demand created using the october 2010 NPA exhaust Analysis. Although this number is higher than the gross Co code demand in previous years, it accounts for any possible increase in Co code demand that may occur over the remaining years of the NANP life.

1. NPAs 844, 833, 822, 880, 881, 882, 883, 884, 885, 886, 887 and 889.2. these include the 5 codes reserved for future PCS expansion (522, 544, 566, 577

and 588) and 6 of the codes reserved for Canada (622, 633, 644, 655, 677 and 688).3. the base model used in the April 2010 study used an average demand rate of 5,500

codes. the october 2009 study used an average demand rate of 5,700 codes.


2010 NANP eXHAuSt ANAlYSIS

Model Based on projected Demandusing an average Co code demand rate of 5,500 codes assigned per year, the projected NANP exhaust date is beyond 2040, assuming the quantity of NPAs available remains 685.4

Sensitivity AnalysisDue to the results of the base model, the only sensitivity analysis performed was an increase in the average annual Co code demand on the results. For comparison purposes, NANPA performed a sensitivity analysis using an average annual demand of 6,100 Co codes, which represented the gross demand as calculated from the october 2010 NPA exhaust Analysis. this resulted in a projected exhaust beyond 2040.

4. the base model for the April 2010 NANP exhaust study projected an exhaust date beyond 2040.


AttACHMeNt 8 – WHeRe to FIND NuMbeRINg INFoRMAtIoN

Many key numbering documents are available through the Internet. Here are some useful sites.

www.nanpa.comthis is the official NANPA website. Its contents include:

• Assignment listings for NANP numbering resources, including area codes, CICs, N11 codes, vertical service codes, etc.

• Relief planning information for the u.S. and its territories, including a status chart, planning letters, and press releases.

• Central office code assignment information for the u.S. and its territories.

• Contact information for numbering resources.

• Jeopardy procedures.

• Information for NRuF submissions.

• u.S. area code maps.

www.cnac.cathis is the Canadian Numbering Administrator’s site. this site is the master reference for Canadian numbering assignment information and includes information similar to that provided by www.nanpa.com for the u.S. and its territories.

www.nationalpooling.comthis is the National thousands-block Pooling Administration’s site. Information concerning thousands- assignments and availability can be found here.

www.fcc.govSections of the FCC’s website of particular interest are:

• www.fcc.gov/wcb - the home page of the Wireline Competition bureau. orders related to numbering topics, including the Number Resource optimization (NRo) orders, can be found here.

• http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/cpd/Nanc - the home page for the North American Numbering Council (NANC), a federal advisory committee of the FCC that provides analysis and recommendations to the FCC on numbering issues. this site contains their charter, meeting minutes and membership lists.

www.crtc.gc.cathis is the site for the Canadian Radio-television and telecommunications Commission, the Canadian regulator.

www.nanc-chair.orgthis is the home page for the Chair of the NANC. It contains presentations and reports provided to the NANC on issues currently being addressed by the Council. Also included is documentation from the various NANC working groups and issue management groups.

www.atis.orgthis is the Alliance for telecommunications Industry Solutions (AtIS) site. It has several sections of interest for numbering. of particular interest is the Industry Numbering Committee (INC). All finalized INC documents are available for download, including assignment guidelines for numbering resources.

www.itu.intthis is the home page of the International telecommunications union in geneva, Switzerland, the group that sets international standards for telephone numbers. Although much of the information on the site is available to Itu members only, some documents are available to all, including a list of assigned country codes.

www.naruc.orgthis is the home page of the National Association of Regulatory utility Commissioners. NARuC and its committees frequently take positions on numbering issues. links to all of the state commissions’ websites can be found at this site.

• http://www.naruc.org/commissions.cfm – provides links to state regulatory commission websites.

www.npac.comthis is the site for the Number Portability Administration Center or NPAC. the NPAC facilitates local number portability, the ability to change your service provider while retaining your telephone number.

www.sms800.comthis site contains information about the 800 Service Management System (SMS/800) which is the central administration system for the management of toll Free Services.

www.eSQK.com this is the site of the Interim Routing Number Authority (IRNA) for the pseudo Automatic Number Identification (p-ANI) codes which are used for routing emergency calls for Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services.


WHeRe to FIND NuMbeRINg INFoRMAtIoN

www.mbiadmin.comthis is the home page for the uSA and Puerto Rico wireless number resource administrator for Mobile Identification Numbers (MIN), called the MIN block Identifier (MbI). MbI Administration was created in 2002 when the MIN was separated from the Mobile Directory Number (MDN) and became a new number resource to support nationwide roaming, wireless number portability and number pooling.

www.neca.orgthis is the site of the National exchange Carriers Association (NeCA). NeCA administers the FCC’s “access charge” plan. (Access charges are the fees long distance companies pay to access the local phone network to complete calls.)


AttACHMeNt 9 – CoNtACtS IN tHe CouNtRIeS PARtICIPAtINg IN tHe NoRtH AMeRICAN NuMbeRINg PlAN

Country Contact for Formal letters and policy Issues

Contact for Day-to-Day Regulatory numbering Issues

Contact for Central office Code Administration

Anguilla Hon. evan gumbs Minister of Infrastructure, Communications, utilities and HousingPo box 60 Coronation Avenue the Valley, Anguilla West IndiesPhone: 264–497–2442 Fax: 264–497–5695

larry Franklin Permanent Secretary MICuH Coronation AvenuePo box 60the Valley, Anguillabritish West Indies Phone: 264–497–2651 Fax: 264–497–3651 [email protected]

Mr. bill WithersPublic utilities Corporationthe Valley, AnguillaPhone: 264–497–2442Fax: 264–497–[email protected]

Antigua & barbuda Hon. Dr. edmund Mansoor Minister of State – Information, broadcasting & telecommunicationsSealy business Complex,Sir george Walter HighwaySt. John’s, Antigua, West IndiesPhone: 268–562–2157Fax: 268–562–2801

Mr. Clement Samueltelecommunications officerMinistry of Information, broadcasting and telecommunicationstelecommunications Division4th floor State Insurance business Center thames and long StreetSt. John’s, Antigua, West IndiesPhone: 268–562–1868Fax: 268–562–[email protected]

bahamas usman SaadatDirector of Policy & Regulationsutilities Regulation and Competition Authority (uRCA)Agape House 4th terrace east Collins AvenuePo box N 4860Nassau, [email protected]

leonard S. AdderleySCoutilities Regulation and Competition Authority (uRCA)Agape House 4th terrace east Collins AvenuePo box N 4860Nassau, bahamasPhone: 242–322–4437Fax: 242–323–[email protected]

barbados Mr. Ronald bascombePS, energy & telecommunications Ministry of Finance and Investment, labour, Civil Service and energygovernment Headquartersbay StreetSt. Michael barbadosPhone: 246–426–3179Fax: 246–436–9280

Mr. Reginald bourne the Chief telecommunications officertelecoms unit3rd Floor eastthe Warrens office Complex WarrensSt. Michael bb12001Phone: 246–310–2251

bermuda William g. FrancisActing Permanent Secretary Ministry of energy, telecommunications & e-CommercePo box HM101, HMAXHamilton, bermudaPhone: 441–297–7931Fax: 441–295–[email protected]

Hiram edwardsActing Director of telecommunicationsP.o. box HM101, HMAXHamilton, bermudaPhone: 441–298–7444Fax: 441–295–[email protected]


CoNtACtS IN tHe CouNtRIeS PARtICIPAtINg IN tHe NoRtH AMeRICAN NuMbeRINg PlAN




british Virgin Islands Hon. Julian Fraser, R.A.Minister of Communications and Works33 Admin DriveWickhams Cay IRoad town, tortolabritish Virgin IslandsPhone: 284–468–3701 x2183Fax: 284–494–3873

telecommunications officer, telecommunications unit, R.g. Hodge Plaza, 3rd FloorRoad town, tortola, bVIPhone: 284–494–3701 ext. 3603Fax: 284–494–[email protected]

Canada Robert A. MorinSecretary generalCanadian Radio-television and telecommunications Commissionottawa, ontarioCanada K1A 0N2Phone: 819–953–3991Fax: 819–953–0589

bill MasonManager Numbering AdministrationCanadian Radio-television and telecommunications Commissionles terrasses de la ChaudièreCentral building1 Promenade du Portagegatineau, Quebec J8X 4b1(by mail to: ottawa, oN, Canada K1A 0N2)Phone: 819–953–[email protected]

glenn PilleyDirectorCanadian Numbering AdministratorSAIC Canada1516–60 Queen Street ottawa, ontarioCanada K1P 5Y7 Phone: 613–683–3289Fax: 613–563–[email protected]

Cayman Islands David ArchboldManaging DirectorInformation & Communications technology AuthorityP.0. box 2502 gtgeorge town, grand CaymanCayman IslandsPhone: 345–946–4282Fax: 345–945–[email protected]

Dominica Hon. Ambrose georgeMinister of Information, telecommunications and Constituency empowerment3rd Floor, government Headquarters,Kennedy Avenue, RoseauPhone: 767–266–3294 Fax: 767–448–[email protected]

Craig Nestyexecutive DirectorNational telecommunications Regulatory Commission42–2 Kennedy AvenueP.o. box 649Roseau, Commonwealth of DominicaPhone: 767–440–0627Fax: 767–440–[email protected]

Craig Nestyexecutive DirectorNational telecommunications Regulatory Commission42–2 Kennedy AvenueP.o. box 649Roseau, Commonwealth of DominicaPhone: 767–440–0627Fax: 767–440–[email protected]

Dominican Republic David PerezMinister of State PresidentSanto DomingoDominican RepublicPhone: 829–473–8553Fax: 829–732–[email protected]

eduardo evertzManagerConcessions and licenses DepartmentPhone: 829–473–8503Fax: 829–732–[email protected]

Jose PerezengineerConcessions and licenses DepartmentPhone: 829–473–8504 [email protected]

grenada the Honorable Joseph gilbertMinister for Works, Physical Development and Public utilitiesMinisterial Complex, botanical gardenstanteen, St. george’s, grenadaPhone: 473–440–2271Fax: 473–440–[email protected]

Aldwyn FergusonCoordinator of telecommunicationsNational telecommunications Regulatory CommissionP.o. box 854St. george’s, grenadaPhone: 473–435–6872Fax: 473–435–[email protected]

Aldwyn FergusonCoordinator of telecommunicationsNational telecommunications Regulatory CommissionP.o. box 854St. george’s, grenadaPhone: 473–435–6872Fax: 473–435–[email protected]






Jamaica Maurice CharvisDeputy Director generaloffice of utilities Regulation3rd Floor, PCJ Resource Centre36 trafalgar RoadKingston 10JamaicaPhone: 876–968–6053Fax: 876–929–[email protected]

Curtis Robinson Specialist – Numbering Administration and technical Supportoffice of utilities Regulation3rd Floor, PCJ Resource Centre36 trafalgar RoadKingston 10JamaicaPhone: 876–968–6053Fax: 876–929–[email protected]

Curtis RobinsonSpecialist – Numbering Administration and technical Supportoffice of utilities Regulation3rd Floor, PCJ Resource Centre36 trafalgar RoadKingston 10JamaicaPhone: 876–968–6053Fax: 876–929–[email protected]

Montserrat Hon. Charles KirnonMinister of Communications and WorksP.o. box 344Woodlands, MontserratWest IndiesPhone: 664–491–2521Fax: 664–491–[email protected]

St. Kitts and Nevis Hon. Dr. earl Asim MartinMinister of Public Works, utilities, tranports and PostsSaint Kitts and NevisPhone: 869–466–7032Fax: 869–465–5501

St. lucia Hon. guy JosephMinistry of Communications, Works, transport and Public utilitiesunionSt. luciaWest IndiesPhone: 758–468–4300Fax: 758–453–[email protected]

Alvin AugustinManager of technical ServicesNational telecommunications Regulatory CommissionNo. 35 Chisel StreetP.o. box gM690Castries, St. luciaWest IndiesPhone: 758–458–2035Fax: 758–453–[email protected]

elicious CyrilDirectorNational telecommunications Regulatory CommissionNo. 35 Chisel StreetP.o. box gM690Castries, St. luciaWest IndiesPhone: 758–458–2035 Fax: 758–453–[email protected]

St. Vincent and the grenadines

Apollo KnightsSecretary/Director NtRC2nd Floor NIS buildingupper bay StreetP.o. box 2368KingstownSt. Vincent and the grenadinesWest IndiesPhone: 784–457–2279Fax: 784–457–[email protected]








trinidad and tobago Cris Seecheran executive Director (Ag)telecommunications Authority of trinidad and tobago#5 eighth Avenue extension, off twelfth Streetbarataria, Republic of trinidad and tobagoPhone: 868–675–8288Fax: 868–674–[email protected]

Kirk SookramResource Planning and Management engineertelecommunications Authority of trinidad and tobago#5 eighth Avenue extension, off twelfth Streetbarataria, Republic of trinidad and tobagoPhone: 868–675–8288Fax: 868–674–[email protected]

Kirk SookramResource Planning and Management engineertelecommunications Authority of trinidad and tobago#5 eighth Avenue extension, off twelfth Streetbarataria, Republic of trinidad and tobagoPhone: 868–675–8288Fax: 868–674–[email protected]

turks and Caicos Islands

Mr. Arthur beenPermanent Secretary of tourism, trade and Communicationsgovernment Squaregrand turk, turks and Caicos Islandsbritish West IndiesPhone: 649–946–1738Fax: 649–946–[email protected]

John WilliamsDirector generaltelecommunications CommissionPo box 203Providencialesturks & Caicos IslandsPhone: 649–946–1900Fax: 649–946–[email protected]

John WilliamsDirector generaltelecommunications CommissionPo box 203Providenciales turks & Caicos IslandsPhone: 649–946–1900Fax: 649–946–[email protected]

united States Sharon gilletChief, Wireline Competition bureauFederal Communications Commission445 12th St., SWWashington, DC 20554Phone: 202–418–1500Fax: 202–418–2825

beth SpragueRegional DirectorNANPA Code AdministrationNeuStar, Inc.46000 Center oak PlazaSterling, VA 20166Phone: 571–434–5513Fax: 571–434–[email protected]


AttACHMeNt 10 – lISt oF ACRoNYMS

ABeC – Alternate billing exchange Code

AoCn – Administrative operating Company Number

AnI – Automatic Number Identification

ASR – Access Service Request

AtIS – Alliance for telecommunications Industry Solutions

CIC – Carrier Identification Code

CleC – Competitive local exchange Carrier

CD – Compact Disk

Co – Central office

CMRS – Commercial Mobile Radio Service

CRtC – Canadian Radio–-television and telecommunications Commission

eFt – electronic File transfer

eSQK – emergency Service Query Key

FCC – Federal Communications Commission

FG B – Feature group b

FG D – Feature group D

FRn – FCC Registration Number

Ftp – File transfer Protocol

IleC – Incumbent local exchange Carrier

InC – Industry Numbering Committee

IpD – Initial Planning Document

Mte – Months–to–exhaust

leC – local exchange Carrier

nAnC – North American Numbering Council

nAnp – North American Numbering Plan

nAnpA – North American Numbering Plan Administration

nAS – NANP Administration System

nnS – NANP Notification System

noWG – Numbering oversight Working group

npA – Numbering Plan Area

nRo – Number Resource optimization

nRuF – Numbering Resource utilization/Forecast

oCn – operating Company Number

p-AnI – Pseudo Automated Number Identification

pA – Pooling Administrator

pAS – Pooling Administration System

potS – Plain old telephone Service

pCS – Personal Communications Service

pStn – Public Switched telephone Network

tn – telephone Number

VoIp – Voice over Internet Protocol

VSC – Vertical Service Code

NANPA AnnuAl RepoRt · 2020-05-06 · (NANPA) Annual Report. this annual report covers NANPA...

Documents

Transcript of NANPA AnnuAl RepoRt · 2020-05-06 · (NANPA) Annual Report. this annual report covers NANPA...