Reviweing the test Advance in Microfludic and Nanofluidic Research
Nanofluidic Microsystems for Advanced Biosample Preparation Ying-Chih Wang ([email protected]) 1,...
-
Upload
eileen-oliver -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Nanofluidic Microsystems for Advanced Biosample Preparation Ying-Chih Wang ([email protected]) 1,...
Nanofluidic Microsystems for Advanced Biosample Preparation
Ying-Chih Wang ([email protected])1, Jianping Fu, Yong-Ak Song and Jongyoon Han 2,3
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2Biological Engineering Division, 3Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 October 3rd, 2006
Microfluidics Tech Fair 2006
Separation
The need and the market for sample preparation
Market of Proteomics, $1.3 billion and growing (13% annually) Greatest challenge in proteomics
Sample complexity (>20,000 different proteins) Purification required 2D gel electrophoresis, $800 M in 2004 ($1.8B 2011)
Time and labor consuming Poor recovery for low abundance sample after multiple steps Consumers: Biologist, Pharmaceutical R&D, clinical diagnostics
Fraction (Mass Spectrometry)Detection
(2D gel analysis)
IN
Our Approach (gel free)
Complex peptide/protein mixture
Sensing/Detection
Droplet/Electrospray
Size-based separation
Charge-based separation
Preconcentration
+ -
- +
- -+
+
Microchip
Sample preparationin microfluidic chip
Our Core (Patented) Techniques
Nanofluidic molecular sieving Continuous biomolecule size separation
Microfluidic charge-based sortingContinuous biomolecule charge separation
Electrokinetic nanofluidic preconcentratorRapid molecular trapping
Enable rapid and economical low-abundant sample identification
Fabrication Method of Nanofluidic Devices
Fabrication DO NOT need nanolithography
Thin channel instead of Narrow channel
Uniform, flat nanofluidic channel confirmed down to 20nm
Pan Mao and Jongyoon Han, 2005, EECS / BE / MIT
Making nanofluidic (20 nm) device using standard microfabrication techniques!
Core Technology I:Nanofluidic filter array for size-based separation
microfluidic buffer channels reservoir
1mm
samplereservoir
10µm
10µm 2µm
10µm
Molecular Separation in 2-D Nanofilter Arrays
Physically hinders protein migration
Continuous two- dimensional separation
Continuous flow separation video (All 20 Speed)
PCR marker. Ex=70 V/cm, Ey=100 V/cm
Ogston sieving, DNA (50 bp – 766 bp, 5 bands)
DNA - Hind III digest. Ex=380 V/cm, Ey=400 V/cm
Entropic trapping, DNA (2 kbp – 23 kbp, 6 bands)
Large Small Small LargeSize:
19
60
µm
19
60
µm
40
80
µm
Large Small
SDS-Protein complex. Ex=150 V/cm, Ey=200 V/cm.
Ogston sieving, protein complex (11 kDa vs. 116 kDa)
A general but unique size-based separation tool. Even larger DNA (~Mbp) possible with this method. J. Fu, A. Stevens, S. R.
Tannenbaum & J. Han. subminted
Core Technology II:Charge separation driven by diffusion potential (no external power)
c=200mMc=1mM
• Different diffusivities of the buffer ions generate a diffusion potential across the liquid junction• Potential gradient (electric field) utilized for binary sorting
Ampholyte-free pI-based separation Continuous-flow operation
Song, Y.-A., Hsu, S., Stevens, A.and Han, J. Anal. Chem. (2006).
Core Technology III: Preconcentration by Ion Selective Nanofluidic Channels
Fabrication: Mao et al., Lab Chip, 2005, (8),837-844
Wang et al, Anal. Chem., 77, 4293
Electrical double layer overlapping:
Device layout:
20 mm
Allen, Bard “Electrochemical Methods”
micro channel: cross section 1x10m ~50mx50mlength 1 -2 cmnano channel:cross section 40nm x20m ~40mx200mlength 100 -200m
Preconcentration Mechanism
t = 0 t = 40 min
ET ( )
105 107
Million-fold Protein Concentration Enhancement
Regular, stable pore size contributes its long term stability
Wang, Y.-C., Stevens, A. L.and Han, J. Anal. Chem. 77, 4293-4299 (2005).
Vision: The Integrated sample preparation device
Size separation Charge Separation Pre-concentration
pI-based Sorter
size-based Sorter
Protein Concentrator
Silicon-based technologies make integration easier
Developing Timeline
Our advantages: Rapid biomolecule separation (<30 mins) Minimum sample consumption (<1 l) Automated solution for biomarker discovery/ tracking Better recovery compares to 2D gel (no post processing) Direct coupling to mass spectroscopy or immunoassay
Principal Investigator: Jongyoon (Jay) Han, [email protected]