Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

37
NAEP estimated equivalency 2011 WKCE Internal report

description

3/29/2012 WKCE Advanced comparisons

Transcript of Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Page 1: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

NAEP estimated equivalency 2011 WKCE

Internal report

Page 2: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

We are now entering a new phase of accountability that will be tied

to NAEP scores.

The rules have changed. This is not just a tweaking; the

change is huge!

Page 3: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

If the currently discussed estimates of NAEP cut scores hold,

the old proficient category is now only basic and only the old advanced category will be proficient or advanced.

The bar has been raised significantly.

Page 4: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Basketball analogy:

under the old WKCE system we were shooting at a 5 foot kids

height basket (many could dunk)

under the NAEP equivalency that basket has been raised up to 10

feet (only a few can dunk).

Page 5: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

No matter how this will be explained, the bottom-line is that

the expectations on our system have now been increased to even higher

levels.

The improvement model will be very important as we will be graded on

progress also.

Page 6: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

The NAEP equivalent scores will most likely mirror the advanced category of the WKCE

(latest word from DPI)

Data is from fall 2011 and will be used on school report cards to give our five school entities a school grade between 0 and 100

How these WKCE scores will translate into that specific grade is unknown

Page 7: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

We did very well under the old system – we were bouncing up

toward 90% proficient and advanced. Staff and Students need to be congratulated for that success.

Now, we need to adjust to the reality of the new levels and the associated

goals and ratings.

Page 8: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Goal One:

Above 50% proficient (on NAEP scale) in Reading and Math across

all grades

With the NAEP reset, we have a lot of work to do

Page 9: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Advanced Reading (PdC blue State red)

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 1020

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

34

40

37

59

41 41

54

4443

38

45

49

40

49

Page 10: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Advanced Math (PdC blue State red)

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 1020

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

29

37

49

35 35

27

31

38

41

48

3837

31

25

Page 11: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Goal Two:

Above State Average in Reading and Math across all grades

With the NAEP reset, we have a lot of work to do

Page 12: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

PdC vs State in Reading

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 10

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

-10

-3

-1

14

-8

1

5

Future is Bright

Page 13: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

PdC vs State in Math

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 10

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

-9

-4

1

-3

-2

-4

6

Future is Bright

Page 14: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

One way to see where we are now is to compare with schools in our

region.

The following slides outline the advanced percentages for all the

schools in CESA 3.

Page 15: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

“Stretch” Goal Three:

Top in CESA 3 in Reading and Math across all grades

With the NAEP reset, we have a lot of work to do

Page 16: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 10 Math rank 7 in CESA

Seneca

Belmont C

ommunity

Benton

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

Barnev

eld

West

on

Highlan

d

Shullsb

urg

Black H

awk

Riverd

ale

Kickap

oo Area

Boscobel

Area

Richlan

d

Iowa-Gran

t

Cuba City

Cassvil

le

Fennim

ore Community

Pecatonica

AreaPotosi

Argyle

Darlingto

n Community

Lancas

ter Community

Mineral P

oint Unified

Prairie

du Chien Area

Ithaca

North Craw

ford

Dodgevil

le

River V

alley

River R

idge

Plattev

ille0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

31.20%

Page 17: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 8 Math rank 21 in CESA

Seneca

Shullsb

urg

North Craw

ford

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

Riverd

ale

Belmont C

ommunity

Boscobel

Area

Black H

awk

Fennim

ore Community

Mineral P

oint Unified

Prairie

du Chien Area

Lancas

ter Community

Iowa-Gran

t

Barnev

eld

Cassvil

le

Highlan

dIth

aca

Richlan

dArgy

le

Benton

River V

alley

Cuba City

River R

idge

Pecatonica

Area

Dodgevil

le

West

onPotosi

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Darlingto

n Community

Kickap

oo Area

Plattev

ille0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

27.20%

Page 18: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 7 Math rank 15 in CESA

Boscobel

Area

Belmont C

ommunity

West

on

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Riverd

ale

Seneca

Black H

awk

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

Highlan

dArgy

le

Cassvil

le

Kickap

oo Area

Fennim

ore Community

Lancas

ter Community

Richlan

d

North Craw

ford

Prairie

du Chien Area

Barnev

eld

Shullsb

urg

Mineral P

oint Unified

Benton

Ithaca

Pecatonica

Area

River R

idge

Dodgevil

le

River V

alley

Iowa-Gran

t

Cuba City

Potosi

Plattev

ille

Darlingto

n Community0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

35.20%

Page 19: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 6 Math rank 16 in CESA

Shullsb

urg

Boscobel

Area

Highlan

d

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

Seneca

Black H

awk

Mineral P

oint Unified

Argyle

Lancas

ter Community

Fennim

ore Community

Cuba City

Kickap

oo Area

West

onPotosi

Ithaca

Prairie

du Chien Area

Riverd

ale

Barnev

eld

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Richlan

d

Pecatonica

Area

North Craw

ford

Darlingto

n Community

Dodgevil

le

Iowa-Gran

t

Benton

River V

alley

Belmont C

ommunity

River R

idge

Plattev

ille

Cassvil

le0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

35.20%

Page 20: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 5 Math rank 14 in CESA

Boscobel

Area

Highlan

d

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

Ithaca

North Craw

ford

Riverd

ale

River R

idge

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Kickap

oo AreaPotosi

Cassvil

le

Fennim

ore Community

Shullsb

urg

Black H

awkArgy

le

Richlan

d

Lancas

ter Community

Prairie

du Chien Area

Pecatonica

Area

Mineral P

oint Unified

Darlingto

n Community

Seneca

Belmont C

ommunity

Cuba City

Barnev

eld

Dodgevil

le

West

on

Iowa-Gran

t

River V

alley

Plattev

ille

Benton

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

48.60%

Page 21: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 4 Math rank 20 in CESA

Boscobel

Area

Seneca

Ithaca

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Argyle

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

Belmont C

ommunity

Mineral P

oint Unified

Potosi

North Craw

ford

Iowa-Gran

t

Prairie

du Chien Area

Highlan

d

Shullsb

urg

West

on

Lancas

ter Community

Black H

awk

River R

idge

Cuba City

Riverd

ale

Richlan

d

Kickap

oo Area

Fennim

ore Community

Cassvil

le

Barnev

eld

Dodgevil

le

Pecatonica

Area

Darlingto

n Community

Plattev

ille

River V

alley

Benton

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

37.10%

Page 22: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 3 Math rank 20 in CESA

Riverd

ale

West

on

North Craw

fordArgy

le

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

Darlingto

n Community

Highlan

d

Seneca

Kickap

oo Area

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Shullsb

urg

Prairie

du Chien Area

Richlan

d

Boscobel

Area

Lancas

ter Community

Mineral P

oint Unified

Pecatonica

Area

River R

idgeIth

aca

Iowa-Gran

t

Fennim

ore Community

Barnev

eld

Cassvil

le

Belmont C

ommunity

Benton

River V

alley

Dodgevil

le

Cuba City

Plattev

ille

Black H

awkPotosi

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

28.60%

Page 23: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 10 Reading rank 9 in CESA

Pecatonica

Area

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

Shullsb

urg

Black H

awk

Boscobel

Area

Darlingto

n Community

Iowa-Gran

t

Highlan

d

West

on

Kickap

oo Area

Lancas

ter Community

Riverd

ale

Cuba City

Belmont C

ommunity

Cassvil

le

Richlan

d

Seneca

River R

idge

Mineral P

oint Unified

Barnev

eld

Dodgevil

le

Prairie

du Chien Area

Fennim

ore Community

North Craw

fordPotosi

River V

alley

Argyle

Benton

Plattev

illeIth

aca0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

53.80%

Page 24: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 8 Reading rank 16 in CESA

Black H

awk

Boscobel

Area

Seneca

Barnev

eld

Benton

Belmont C

ommunity

West

on

Pecatonica

Area

Shullsb

urg

Fennim

ore Community

Mineral P

oint Unified

Lancas

ter Community

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

PotosiIth

aca

Prairie

du Chien Area

River R

idge

Cuba City

North Craw

ford

River V

alley

Darlingto

n Community

Richlan

d

Dodgevil

le

Kickap

oo Area

Plattev

ille

Iowa-Gran

t

Cassvil

le

Riverd

aleArgy

le

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Highlan

d0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

40.70%

Page 25: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 7 Reading rank 25 in CESA

Boscobel

Area

Seneca

Kickap

oo AreaIth

aca

West

on

Riverd

ale

Prairie

du Chien Area

Lancas

ter Community

Belmont C

ommunity

Black H

awk

Shullsb

urg

Richlan

d

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Cassvil

le

Fennim

ore Community

Pecatonica

AreaPotosi

North Craw

ford

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

River R

idge

River V

alley

Argyle

Cuba City

Highlan

d

Mineral P

oint Unified

Darlingto

n Community

Dodgevil

le

Iowa-Gran

t

Barnev

eld

Plattev

ille

Benton

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

40.70%

Page 26: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 6 Reading rank 9 in CESA

Shullsb

urg

Pecatonica

Area

Seneca

Cuba City

West

onIth

acaPotosi

Richlan

d

Lancas

ter Community

Highlan

d

Boscobel

Area

Barnev

eld

Riverd

ale

Kickap

oo Area

Darlingto

n Community

Black H

awk

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Iowa-Gran

t

River R

idge

Dodgevil

le

Mineral P

oint Unified

Fennim

ore Community

Prairie

du Chien Area

North Craw

ford

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

River V

alley

Plattev

illeArgy

le

Cassvil

le

Benton

Belmont C

ommunity0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

59.30%

Page 27: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 5 Reading rank 18 in CESA

Riverd

ale

Belmont C

ommunityIth

aca

Boscobel

Area

Seneca

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Richlan

d

River R

idge

Cuba City

North Craw

fordArgy

le

Kickap

oo Area

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

Prairie

du Chien Area

Barnev

eld

Pecatonica

Area

Iowa-Gran

t

West

on

Darlingto

n Community

Shullsb

urg

Highlan

d

Cassvil

le

Lancas

ter Community

River V

alley

Fennim

ore Community

Plattev

illePotosi

Black H

awk

Mineral P

oint Unified

Dodgevil

le

Benton

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

36.50%

Page 28: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 4 Reading rank 21 in CESA

Boscobel

Area

Seneca

Potosi

Mineral P

oint Unified

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Argyle

Iowa-Gran

t

Highlan

d

Kickap

oo Area

Pecatonica

Area

Prairie

du Chien Area

Fennim

ore Community

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

West

on

Darlingto

n Community

Richlan

d

Riverd

ale

Belmont C

ommunityIth

aca

Barnev

eld

North Craw

ford

Cuba City

Dodgevil

le

Lancas

ter Community

Plattev

ille

Cassvil

le

Shullsb

urg

River R

idge

River V

alley

Black H

awk

Benton

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

40.30%

Page 29: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Grade 3 Reading rank 26 in CESA

Riverd

ale

Richlan

d

Highlan

d

North Craw

ford

Lancas

ter Community

Prairie

du Chien Area

Southwest

ern W

isconsin

Wau

zeka-S

teuben

Pecatonica

Area

Kickap

oo Area

Boscobel

Area

Mineral P

oint Unified

Cassvil

le

Darlingto

n Community

Iowa-Gran

t

Argyle

Shullsb

urg

Plattev

ille

West

on

Barnev

eld

Dodgevil

le

Cuba City

PotosiIth

aca

River V

alley

Fennim

ore Community

River R

idge

Belmont C

ommunity

Benton

Seneca

Black H

awk

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

34.30%

Page 30: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

How the school grading system will work is unknown.

To estimate where we fall compared to the other CESA

Schools, the following slides give an approximate percentile (grade?)

by the percent of schools scoring lower than our scores.

Page 31: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

ABCD F

MATH by Grade: percentile rank in CESA 3

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 100%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

35% 35%

55%

48%52%

32%

77%

The school score/grade is the scary part of all of this – will the media report it something like this??

Page 32: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

READING by Grade: percentile rank in CESA 3

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 100%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

16%

32%

42%

71%

19%

48%

71%

Page 33: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Where do we go from here?

• 4K Data looks great – future is bright. • BAK MAP scores are looking good, especially on

the reading side – future is bright. (Once we get the final cut scores we can extrapolate that MAP data to those same levels.)

• BAK and BV Elementary Teachers are currently discussing the efficacy of a different math program – future is bright.

• PLC up through grade 4 in place, and with the additional staff planned we will have the RtI continuum all through PK to 4 – future is bright.

Page 34: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

Where do we go from here?• MS and JH STEM Teachers are exploring math

and science upgrades – future is bright. • Given the higher levels coming into the middle

grades, a review of the ELA curriculum is in order – future is bright.

• High School discussions are on-going about significant Humanities upgrades for 13-14 – future is bright.

• 4 more AP classes to be added in 12-13 – future is bright.

Page 35: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

End with the PositivesCelebrate Academic Achievements

Math• The High School leads the way as the students

(grade 10 test) tested 6 points over the state average and rank 7th in the CESA

• Nice continued progress in grades 3 through 8 (future is bright) as only a handful of kids moving up will get most grades well above state averages

Page 36: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

End with the PositivesCelebrate Academic Achievements

English Language Arts (Reading)• Grade 6 takes high honors as the students

tested 14 points over the state average and tied with the high school ranking 9th in the CESA

• Nice linear growth upward coming out of the elementary grades (future is bright)

Page 37: Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt

This is meant only to be internal data for the purposes of reflection and planning as the final NAEP cut

scores have not been released