NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the...

21
NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston, Texas May 28-31, 2003

Transcript of NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the...

Page 1: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

NACME-GEM DATA BOOK

A Resource for

Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the

Economic TurnaroundThe Intercontinental Hotel

Houston, Texas May 28-31, 2003

Page 2: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

- 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0

Total S&E

Engineering

Physical Sciences

Math & Computer Sciences

Biological & Agric. Sciences

Social Sciences & Psychology

Proportion of Bachelor's Degrees Earned by Underrepresented Minorities by Broad Field,

Selected Years

1990 1995 2000Source: CPST, data derived from National Science Foundation

DIVERSITY WITHIN DIVERSITY

Proportion of B.S. Degrees Earned by

Underrepresented Minorities,

By Broad Field, 1990-2000

Page 3: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

Contents

• Purpose of the Data Book

• Demographics & Enrollments

• Degrees

• Institutional Production

• Workforce

Page 4: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

Purpose of the Data Book

• NACME and GEM are pleased to provide the data that follow as an authoritative understanding of the state of minority participation in engineering and science education and the workforce.

• The data derive from the Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology (www.cpst.org), a NACME contractor, based on Engineering Workforce Commission and National Science Foundation data sources.

• We have selected a sample of trends and snapshots to inform the discussions at our Engineering Collaborations conference in Houston. Please refer to them!

Page 5: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

75.1%

12.5% 12.3%

3.8% 0.9% 2.4%5.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

U.S. Population by Race/Ethnicity, 2000

White

Hispanic

Black or AfricanAmerican

Asian & PacificIslander

American Indianor Alaska Native

Two or moreraces

Some Other Race

H ig h S c h o o l C o m p le t io n R a te s b y R a c e /E th n ic i ty , 1 9 7 5 - 2 0 0 0

S o u r c e : U .S . C e n s u s B u r e a u , C u r r e n t P o p u la t io n R e p o r ts0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

1975 76 78 79 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000

Pe

rce

nt

Whites

African Americans

Hispanics

Asians

DEMOGRAPHICS

Page 6: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

Fastest Growing States, 2000-2010 High school-age population

(in %)

• Nevada 70• Arizona 48 • North Carolina 31 • Florida 28 • Georgia 23 • Connecticut 23 • California 20 • Massachusetts 21

Source: U.S. Census

Page 7: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

Workforce Growth, by Group2000-2010

36

17

6

37

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Latino African American White Asian/other

Source: Occupational Outlook Quarterly, Winter 2001-02

(Percent)

Page 8: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

The Road to EngineeringThe Under-tapped Minority Pool

532,000

32,000 21,000 15,000 6,7000

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

High school grads Math/science achievement

Engineering eligible Admitted

Engineering grads

Rounded figures, derived from American Council of Education, and NACME analysis of Engineering Workforce Commission data. High school grad/engineering admits, 1996; Graduates, 2000. Excludes Puerto Rico.

Page 9: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

21.9%

61.8% 60.9%

183.7%

7.0%

-7.9%-20.0%0.0%

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%

100.0%120.0%140.0%160.0%180.0%200.0%

AfricanAmericans

Hispanics NativeAmericans

Asians Women Total

Change in Freshman Engineering Enrollment, 1981-2001

Source: CPST, Data derived from Engineering Workforce Commission

ENROLLMENT

Page 10: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

B.S. IN ENGINEERING BY GENDER,

MINORITY GROUP AND CITIZENSHIP, 1990-2000

African Native Foreign

Women Americans Hispanics Asians Americans Nationals

Year Total No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %

1990 65,967 10,130 15.4 2,173 3.3 2,473 3.7 5,989 9.1 112 0.2 5,121 7.8

1991 63,986 10,016 15.7 2,304 3.6 2,663 4.2 6,305 9.9 146 0.2 4,540 7.1

1992 63,653 9,972 15.7 2,374 3.7 2,708 4.3 6,479 10.2 163 0.3 4,389 6.9

1993 65,001 10,453 16.1 2,637 4.1 2,845 4.4 6,764 10.4 175 0.3 4,604 7.1

1994 64,946 10,800 16.6 2,769 4.3 3,045 4.7 6,881 10.6 207 0.3 4,908 7.6

1995 64,749 11,303 17.5 2,897 4.5 3,409 5.3 7,056 10.9 230 0.4 4,893 7.6

1996 65,267 11,737 18.0 3,120 4.8 3,557 5.4 7,333 11.2 263 0.4 5,042 7.7

1997 65,091 12,160 18.7 3,203 4.9 4,005 6.2 7,625 11.7 265 0.4 5,017 7.7

1998 63,271 11,797 18.6 3,144 5.0 3,939 6.2 7,131 11.3 351 0.6 5,083 8.0

1999 62,500 12,360 19.8 3,171 5.1 4,073 6.5 7,226 11.6 328 0.5 5,052 8.1

2000 63,635 13,140 20.6 3,150 5.0 4,124 6.5 7,529 11.8 347 0.5 5,048 7.9

Total 708,066 123,868 17.5 30,942 4.4 36,841 5.2 76,318 10.8 2,587 0.4 53,697 7.6

Source: CPST, data derived from Engineering Workforce Commission, Engineering and Technology Degrees 1990 through 2000.

DEGREES

Page 11: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

% of Engineering Baccalaureates Earned by Women & Minorities, 1980-2002

9.7%

4.6%

3.3%

14.8

%5.

4%5.

5%

15.4

%7.

2% 9.1%

17.5

%10

.2%

10.9

%

20.6

%

12.0

%11

.8%

20.2

%

11.7

%12

.8%

20.5

%11

.6%

12.6

%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002

Women Underrepresented Minorities Asian

Source: CPST, Data derived from EWC

DEGREES

Page 12: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

Bachelor's Degrees in the Most Popular Engineering Disciplines, with Demographic

Breakouts, 2002

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

Chemical Computer Civil Electrical Mechanical

Black, Hispanic & American Indian Men Asian Men Foreign Men All Other Men All Women

Source: CPST, data derived from Engineering & Technology Degrees, 2002

Bachelor's Degrees Awarded in Engineering and Computer Science by Gender, 1970-2000

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Women

Men

Source: CPST, data derived from National Science Foundation

DEGREES

Page 13: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

6.3

%2

.4% 4

.8%

11

.3%

3.1

%6

.8%

14

.3%

3.6

%8

.3%

16

.7%

4.5

%8

.8%

21

.1%

5.7

%8

.6%

22

.0%

5.3

%8

.7%

22

.1%

5.5

%8

.8%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002

% of Engineering Masters Earned by Women and Minorities, 1980-2002

Women Underrepresented Minorities AsianSource: CPST, data derived from EWC

DEGREES

Page 14: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

3.2

%1.6

%5.6

%

5.7

%2.1

%7.3

%

9.1

%1.8

%5.5

%

12.1

%2.1

%9.1

%

15.8

%3.2

% 6.7

%

16.9

%3.2

% 6.6

%

17.5

%3.7

% 6.8

%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2001 2002

% of Engineering Doctorates Earned by Women and Minorities, 1980-2002

Women

Underrepresented Minorities

Asian

Source: CPST, data derived from EWC

DEGREES

Page 15: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

PhDs in S&E by Gender, 1975-2001 (U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents Only)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001

Men

Women

Source: CPST, data derived from National Science Foundation

DEGREES

Page 16: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

INSTITUTIONAL PRODUCTION

Note: URM = Underrepresented Minorities – African American, Latino, American Indian

Rank School All Women

African American Latino

American Indian Total URM Non-URM

1 Georgia Inst of Tech 1,436 330 112 37 4 153 1,283

2 Penn State University 1,337 249 19 21 0 40 1,297

3 U Illinois - Urbana Champgn 1,213 210 26 36 1 63 1,150

4 U Michigan - Ann Arbor 1,177 309 63 48 6 117 1,060

5 Virginia Poly Institute 1,101 144 32 24 4 60 1,041

6 Purdue University 1,093 215 20 16 1 37 1,056

7 Texas A&M University 999 218 23 95 3 121 878

8 NC State Univ - Raleigh 987 182 64 20 2 86 901

9 U Cal - Berkeley 877 222 12 39 1 52 825

10 Cornell University 767 183 17 29 2 48 719

11 U Texas - Austin 751 161 23 88 2 113 638

12 U Florida 726 137 24 86 5 115 611

13 U Puerto Rico 695 238 0 695 0 695 0

14 Iowa State University 691 117 6 9 0 15 676

15 Michigan Tech University 675 129 4 3 1 8 667

16 Michigan State University 670 164 50 6 1 57 613

17 Mass Inst of Technology 660 207 48 59 11 118 542

18 Ohio State University 633 117 16 10 2 28 605

19 U Washington 607 142 12 15 7 34 573

20 U Wisconsin - Madison 607 117 5 2 1 8 599

21 U Cal - Davis 583 136 9 21 1 31 552

22 U Minnesota 580 105 12 7 3 22 558

23 U Cal - San Diego 560 137 11 36 3 50 510

24 Auburn University 560 134 43 4 2 49 511

25 Cal Poly - San Luis Obispo 548 90 0 0 0 0 548

26 Rennsselaer Polytechnic 547 125 22 24 1 47 500

27 U Missouri - Rolla 498 99 14 5 3 22 476

28 Colorado School of Mines 496 109 5 27 3 35 461

29 U Cal - Los Angeles 492 110 11 33 0 44 448

30 Clemson University 474 97 33 7 0 40 434

31 U Colorado - Boulder 472 105 4 31 3 38 434

32 Arizona State University 472 88 9 40 5 54 418

33 U Maryland - College Park 459 106 51 14 2 67 392

34 U Central Florida 459 84 20 60 4 84 375

35 SUNY - Buffalo Campus 433 59 7 6 0 13 420

36 Washington State Univ 423 93 4 9 5 18 405

37 San Jose State University 420 92 10 31 0 41 379

38 Cal Poly - Pomona 420 52 5 82 1 88 332

39 New Jersey Inst Tech 418 64 51 64 1 116 302

40 U Arizona 417 75 9 57 4 70 347

BS Engineering Graduates in 2001

Page 17: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

Retention Rates of Top 25 Producers of 2001 Native American BS Engineering Graduates

Retention Rates

1 11 Mass Inst of Technology

2 10 NM State University

3 10 Oklahoma State Univ

4 8 U Oklahoma

5 7 U New Mexico

6 7 U Washington

7 7 Worcester Poly Institute

8 6 U Michigan - Ann Arbor

9 5 Arizona State University

10 5 Northern Arizona Univ

11 5 Old Dominion

12 5 San Diego State Univ

13 5 U Alabama Huntsville

14 5 U Florida

15 5 Washington State Univ

16 4 Georgia Inst of Tech 64.517 4 Montana State University

18 4 U Arizona 43.619 4 U Central Florida 62.320 4 U Southwestern Louisiana 72.421 4 Virginia Poly Institute

22 3 Colorado School of Mines 37.923 3 Florida Atlantic Univ

24 3 Kansas State University 15.825 3 Northwestern University 73.0

Rank SchoolAmerican Indian

American Indian Grads

Retention Rates of Top 50 Producers of 2001 Women BS Engineering Graduates

Retention Rates

1 330 Georgia Inst of Tech 78.62 309 U Michigan - Ann Arbor

3 249 Penn State University 65.44 238 U Puerto Rico

5 222 U Cal - Berkeley

6 218 Texas A&M University 42.77 215 Purdue University

8 210 U Illinois - Urbana Champgn

9 207 Mass Inst of Technology

10 183 Cornell University 96.711 182 NC State Univ - Raleigh 53.212 164 Michigan State University 51.013 161 U Texas - Austin 48.814 144 Virginia Poly Institute

15 142 U Washington

16 137 U Cal - San Diego

17 137 U Florida

18 136 U Cal - Davis

19 134 Auburn University 52.120 129 Michigan Tech University

21 125 Rennsselaer Polytechnic

22 117 Iowa State University 41.823 117 Ohio State University

24 117 U Wisconsin - Madison 52.425 115 U Virginia

Rank SchoolWomen

Women Grads

Note: Retention rates (0-100+%) computed for the 2001 graduating class as a percentage of the 1995 freshman class (including transfer students). No rate appears if freshman class is <10 students or institution failed to report data to EWC.

INSTITUTIONAL PRODUCTION

Page 18: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

Retention Rates of Top 50 Producers of 2001 African American BS Engineering Graduates

Retention Rates

1 166 NC A&T State University

2 112 Georgia Inst of Tech 54.83 97 Tennessee State Univ

4 93 FAMU/FSU College of Engrg

5 88 Morgan State University 37.06 79 Southern University 17.57 73 Prairie View A&M Univ

8 71 Tuskegee University

9 64 NC State Univ - Raleigh 37.110 63 U Michigan - Ann Arbor

11 61 Howard University 36.212 51 New Jersey Inst Tech

13 51 U Maryland - College Park 36.214 50 Michigan State University 23.415 48 Mass Inst of Technology

16 46 U South Carolina 45.017 45 CCNY (City College, CUNY)

18 43 Auburn University 37.619 37 U Southwestern Louisiana 51.620 36 Mississippi State Univ

21 34 Rutgers University 55.422 33 Clemson University 35.223 32 Florida Intl University

24 32 U Pittsburgh 91.425 32 U South Florida

Rank School African American

African American

Grads

Retention Rates of Top Producers of 2001 Latino BS Engineering Graduates

Retention Rates

1 695 U Puerto Rico

2 311 Poly Univ of Puerto Rico

3 137 U Texas - El Paso

4 118 Florida Intl University

5 95 Texas A&M University 33.06 88 U Texas - Austin 40.67 86 U Florida

8 82 Cal Poly - Pomona

9 65 Texas A&M U - Kingsville

10 64 New Jersey Inst Tech

11 62 NM State University

12 60 U Central Florida 62.313 59 Mass Inst of Technology

14 57 U Arizona 43.615 49 U Texas - Pan American

16 48 U Michigan - Ann Arbor

17 46 CCNY (City College, CUNY)

18 44 Cal State U - Long Beach

19 44 U Miami 57.120 40 Arizona State University

21 40 U South Florida

22 40 U Texas - San Antonio

23 39 U Cal - Berkeley

24 39 U New Mexico

25 37 Georgia Inst of Tech 64.5

Rank SchoolLatino

Latino Grads

Note: Retention rates (0-100+%) computed for the 2001 graduating class as a percentage of the 1995 freshman class (including transfer students). No rate appears if freshman class is <10 students or institution failed to report data to EWC.

INSTITUTIONAL PRODUCTION

Page 19: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0

Total S&T occupations

Scientists, total

Computer & mathematicalscientists

Physical & relatedscientists

Earth scientists/geologists/oceanographers

Life & related scientists

Engineers

Education Level of S&T Workforce

Bachelor's Master's DoctorateSource: National Science Foundation, SESTAT

WORKFORCE

Page 20: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

Fastest Growing Occupations, 2000-2010

100%

97%

90%

82%

77%

67%

66%

62%

60%

57%

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Computer Software Engineers, Applications

Computer Support Specialists

Computer Software Engineers, Systems Software

Network & Computer Systems Administrators

Network Systems & Data Comm. Analysts

Desktop Publishers

Database Adminstrators

Personal and Home Care Aides

Computer Systems Analysts

Medical Assistants

Percent

WORKFORCE

Page 21: NACME-GEM DATA BOOK A Resource for Engineering Collaborations: Preparing Technology Talent for the Economic Turnaround The Intercontinental Hotel Houston,

  Occupations Business/ Educational

Number Industry Institutions Government

All Occupations 10,981,600 68.8% 18.4% 12.8%

S&T Occupations 3,540,800 70.1 17.2 12.7

Computer/math scientists 1,167,400 80.8 11.3 7.8

Life/related scientists 341,900 33.2 47.8 19.1

Physical/related scientists 297,900 54.1 27.7 18.2

Social/related scientists 166,400 23.6 62.8 13.6

Psychologists 197,000 58.9 30.2 11.0

Engineers 1,370,300 80.9 4.9 14.2

Other occupations (non-S&T) 7,440,800 68.2 19.0 12.8

Source: CPST, data derived from National Science Foundation

Employed U.S. Scientists and Engineers

Sector of Employment

by Sector of Employment, 1999

Adapted from Anderson, Eugene L. (2002) The New Professoriate: Characteristics, Contributions and Compensation. ACE Center for Policy AnalysisSource: U.S. Department of Education, National Study on Postsecondary Faculty, 1999

5.25.37.33.755.358.032.233.0Natural Sci.

4.45.64.63.454.954.636.136.4Engineering

4.85.55.04.439.043.151.247.0Social Sci.

3.96.77.64.936.138.152.350.4Humanities

8.510.612.210.632.736.046.642.8Health Sci.

5.14.17.65.337.141.350.249.4Education

8.27.87.84.435.537.448.450.5Business

199819921998199219981992

No Tenure System at Institution

Non-Tenure Track

Tenured/Tenure Track

19981992

Percentage Full Time

Percentage Part Time

Faculty Status by Principal Field: 1992 and 1998

WORKFORCE