Must Salmon Love Meinhard? Agape and Partnership Fiduciary Duties
-
Upload
stephen-bainbridge -
Category
Education
-
view
1.937 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Must Salmon Love Meinhard? Agape and Partnership Fiduciary Duties
Must Salmon Love Meinhard?
Agape and Partnership Fiduciary Duties
Stephen M. Bainbridge
William D. Warren Distinguished Professor of Law
UCLA School of Law
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Thursday, June 19, 2014
National Business Law Scholars Conference 2014
2
Jeffrie Murphy:
“John Rawls claimed that justice is the first virtue of social institutions,” but “what if we considered agape to be the first virtue? What would law then be like?”
The motivating question
3
1.
2.
3.
Question Posed
Did Cardozo intend the analogy to agape?
Is agape an appropriate legal standard?
If not, does agapic love have any relevance to the governance of partnerships?
4
Meinhard Agape
“Joint adventurers, like copartners, owe to one another, while the enterprise continues, the duty of the finest loyalty. …. Not honesty alone, but the punctilio of an honor the most sensitive, is then the standard of behavior.”
Salmon “was much more than a coadventurer. He was a managing coadventurer.” • “Salmon had put himself in a position
in which thought of self was to be renounced, however hard the abnegation.”
Agape is said to be the “‘perfect love,’ which seeks the good of the beloved beyond thought of self.”
It is “a devotion that gives whatever is best for others without thought of self-gain.”
Agape thus “is the willingness to let the self be destroyed rather than that the other cease to be; it is the commitment of the self by self-binding will to make the other great.”
The analogy
5
“The image is one of religion, transcendence and mysticism. The connotation is that when it comes to dealings with co-partners, a person must behave with monastic purity, placing always the other’s interests above his own.”
Geoffrey Miller on Meinhard
6
Agape is too indeterminate a standard.
text
text
Indeterminacy
Is agape an appropriate standard?
7
Agape is too indeterminate a standard.
Agapic love is too high of a standard.
Indeterminacy Asking Too Much
Is agape an appropriate standard?
8
Agape is too indeterminate a standard.
Agapic love is too high of a standard.
Law has an expressive function.
Law can encourage best practice.
What Can Law Do?
Indeterminacy Asking Too Much
Is agape an appropriate standard?
9
Love TrustLess need for monitoring and
bonding
Reduced agency costs
A more efficient and successful
partnership
The instrumental value of agape