Mule Munit

27
Solution for JUnit Functional test cases By: Mahesh Yatam 22-Sep-2015

Transcript of Mule Munit

Page 1: Mule Munit

Solution for JUnit Functional test casesBy: Mahesh Yatam

22-Sep-2015

Page 2: Mule Munit

Abstract

• The main motto of this white paper is what the issues to write test cases using JUnit are and how to overcome those issues.

Page 3: Mule Munit

Table of Contents

• ABSTRACT1. INTRODUCTION2. PROBLEM STATEMENT3. SOLUTION4. BENEFITS5. CONCLUSION6. REFERENCES7. ABOUT THE AUTHOR8. ABOUT WHISHWORKS

Page 4: Mule Munit

Introduction

• We have multiple unit test frameworks to write unit and functional test cases for our services. When we write functional test cases using JUnit we can’t mock mule components. To resolve this issues we have to use MUnit and I am going to explain what is the problem with JUnit and how to resolve using MUnit in the below.

Page 5: Mule Munit

Problem Statement

• When we write functional test cases using JUnit, the test case will directly connect to original components like SAP, Salesforce etc. and insert/select the data. It is the issue in JUnit functional test case why because we are writing functional test cases to check whether entire functionality is working as expected or not without modifying the original components(SAP,Salesforce,Database) data, but in JUnit functional test cases it is directly connecting to original components and modifying the original data.

• Examples:

1. SAP Connector

• Mule flow:

Page 6: Mule Munit
Page 7: Mule Munit

• Flow of execution1. Trigger the service with xml request.2. Receive the input request and process it.3. Transform the processed request to SAP IDoc and push it to SAP.

Page 8: Mule Munit

• Functional test case using JUnit:

• Public void functionalTest(){• • File fXmlFile = new File(request.xml);• StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();• BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fXmlFile));• • String sCurrentLine = new String();• //Read the data from file and append to string• while ((sCurrentLine = br.readLine()) != null) {• sb.append(sCurrentLine);• }• • DefaultHttpClient httpclient = new DefaultHttpClient();• • HttpPost httppost = new HttpPost(requrl);• • httppost.setEntity(new StringEntity(sb.toString(), "UTF-8"));• //Trigger the service• HttpResponse response = httpclient.execute(httppost);• • ----• ----• }•

Page 9: Mule Munit

• Flow of execution1. Read the input request from request.xml file.2. Trigger the service with above request.3. Process the input request.4. Transform the processed request to SAP IDoc and push it to SAP.• Issue• Here we are unable to mock the SAP component so

the test case is directly pushing the IDoc to original SAP.

• NOTE: Not only pushing the IDoc to SAP, at the time of receiving IDoc from SAP also we will face same issue.

Page 10: Mule Munit

• 2. Salesforce

• Mule flow

Page 11: Mule Munit
Page 12: Mule Munit

• Flow of execution1. Trigger the service with xml request.2. Processes the input request.3. Create the processed request as customer in Salesforce.

Page 13: Mule Munit

• Functional Test Case• Public void functionalTest(){• • File fXmlFile = new File(request.xml);• StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();• BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(fXmlFile));• • String sCurrentLine = new String();• // Read the data from file and append to string• while ((sCurrentLine = br.readLine()) != null) {• sb.append(sCurrentLine);• }• • DefaultHttpClient httpclient = new DefaultHttpClient();• • HttpPost httppost = new HttpPost(requrl);• • httppost.setEntity(new StringEntity(sb.toString(), "UTF-8"));• //Trigger the service• HttpResponse response = httpclient.execute(httppost);• • ----• ----• }

Page 14: Mule Munit

• Flow of Execution1. First read the input request from request.xml file.2. Trigger the service with above request.3. Process the input request.4. Create the customer in salesforce. • Issue• Here also we are unable to mock the Salesforce

component so it will connect to original Salesforce connector and create the customer on it.

Page 15: Mule Munit

Solution

• To resolve the above JUnit functional test case issue we have a separate framework called MUnit. MUnit is also one framework which is used to write test cases as same as JUnit, but here in MUnit we can mock all components like SAP, Salesforce, Database etc. So to overcome the above problem we can use MUnit to write functional test cases.

Page 16: Mule Munit

• Example

• Mocking Salesforce test case using Munit

• .mflow

• <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>• • <mule xmlns="http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/core" xmlns:vm="http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/vm"

xmlns:sfdc="http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/sfdc" xmlns:doc="http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/documentation" xmlns:spring="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:core="http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/core" version="EE-3.4.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/vm http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/vm/current/mule-vm.xsd

• http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/sfdc http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/sfdc/5.0/mule-sfdc.xsd• http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-current.xsd• http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/core http://www.mulesoft.org/schema/mule/core/current/mule.xsd">• <vm:endpoint exchange-pattern="request-response" path="CREATE_CSTMR_VM" name="CREATE_CSTMR_VM" doc:name="VM"/>• <vm:endpoint exchange-pattern="request-response" path="INSERT_PERSON_ACT_VM" name="INSERT_PERSON_ACT_VM" doc:name="VM"/>• <flow name="CreateCustomerSFServiceTSFlow1" doc:name="CreateCustomerSFServiceTSFlow1">• <vm:inbound-endpoint exchange-pattern="request-response" ref="CREATE_CSTMR_VM" doc:name="VM"/>• <component class="com.vertu.services.ecom.maintaincustmr.processor.CreateCustomerProcessor" doc:name="CreateCustomerProcessor"/>• </flow>• <flow name="CreateCustomerSFServiceTSFlow2" doc:name="CreateCustomerSFServiceTSFlow2">• <vm:inbound-endpoint exchange-pattern="request-response" ref="INSERT_PERSON_ACT_VM" doc:name="VM"/>• <sfdc:create config-ref="ECOM_SALESFORCE_CONNECTOR" type="#[payload.Type]" doc:name="Salesforce">• <sfdc:objects ref="#[payload.Object]"/>• </sfdc:create>• </flow>• </mule>

• Here we have a Salesforce component to create the customer in Salesforce and return the customer-id as payload. So in functional test case we should mock this component without connecting to original Salesforce.

Page 17: Mule Munit

• How to mock Salesforce component in MUnit functional test case• • To mock Salesforce component, first we should know• • Endpoint type.• Name of the message processor and namespace of endpoint (from auto-generated XML).• The type of payload the endpoint returns.• • • Mocking above flow Salesforce component• • Create the salesforce response payload.• • List<Map<String,Object>> l1 = new ArrayList<Map<String,Object>>();• Map<String,Object> m1 = new HashMap<Srtring,Object>>();• m1.put(“custid”,”1234”);• l1.add(m1);• • Mock the salesforce component and return the above created list as response payload.• • whenMessageProcessor("create").ofNamespace("sfdc"). • thenReturn( muleMessageWithPayload( l1) );

Page 18: Mule Munit

• MUnit functional test case for above flow• public class MUnitSalesforceStubTest extends FunctionalMunitSuite { • /** • * The purpose of this method is to define the list of flow • * files which will be loaded by Munit test case before executing • * Munit test case. Specify multiple flow files as comma • * separated XML files. • */ • @Override • protected String getConfigResources() { • return "src/main/app/MUnitSFTest.xml"; • } • /**• *The purpose of this method is to define the list of • flow name which will execute in Munit test case.• */• protected List<String> getFlowsExcludedOfInboundDisabling(){• List<String> list = new ArrayList<String>();• list.add("CreateCustomerSFServiceTSFlow2");• return list;• }• /** • * The purpose of this method is to flip between mock • * and real time interfaces. Return false to Mock • * all endpoints in your flow • */ • @Override • public boolean haveToMockMuleConnectors() { • return true; • }

Page 19: Mule Munit

• /** • * Java based Munit test case. Contains mocking and • * invocation of flows and assertions. • */ • @Test • public void validateEchoFlow() throws Exception { • • List<Map<String,Object>> l1 = new ArrayList<Map<String,Object>>();• Map<String,Object> m1 = new HashMap<Srtring,Object>>();• m1.put(“custid”,”1234”);• l1.add(m1);• • // Mock SFDC outbound endpoint • whenMessageProcessor("query").ofNamespace("sfdc").thenReturn( muleMessageWithPayload( l1) ); • • // Run the Munit test case by passing a test payload • MuleEvent resultEvent = runFlow( " CreateCustomerSFServiceTSFlow1", testEvent(“request”)); • // The resultEvent contains response from the VM flow • System.out.println( "The flow response is:: " + resultEvent.getMessage().getPayloadAsString() ); • // Do any assertion here using Assert.equals() for asserting response // payload • } • }

Page 20: Mule Munit

• Mocking Database component test case using MUnit

• .mflow<flow name="CheckAcctIDFlow" doc:name="CheckAcctIDFlow"> <vm:inbound-endpoint exchange-pattern="request-response" ref="FETCH_ACT_GUID_VM1" doc:name="FETCH_ACT_GUID_VM1"/> <logger message="#[message.inboundProperties['ACCT_GUID']]" level="INFO" doc:name="Logger"/> <jdbc-ee:outbound-endpoint exchange-pattern="request-response" queryKey="Get_ACC_ID" queryTimeout="-1" connector-ref="CDMR_JDBC_CONNECTOR" doc:name="Get_ACCT_ID"/> </flow>

• Here we have a database component used to select and return the account-id from database. So we need to mock this component in functional test case.

Page 21: Mule Munit

• Mocking above flow Database component• • Create the database response payload.• • List<Map<String,Object>> l1 = new ArrayList<Map<String,Object>>();• Map<String,Object> m1 = new HashMap<Srtring,Object>>();• m1.put(“accountid”,”1234”);• l1.add(m1);• • Mock the database component and return the above created list as

response payload.• • whenEndpointWithAddress( "jdbc://Get_ACC_ID" ).thenReturn(new

DefaultMuleMessage(l1, muleContext ) );

Page 22: Mule Munit

• MUnit functional test case for above flow• public class MUnitSalesforceStubTest extends FunctionalMunitSuite { • /** • * The purpose of this method is to define the list of flow • * files which will be loaded by Munit test case before executing • * Munit test case. Specify multiple flow files as comma • * separated XML files. • */ • @Override • protected String getConfigResources() { • return "src/main/app/MUnitSFTest.xml"; • } • • /** • * The purpose of this method is to flip between mock • * and real time interfaces. Return false to Mock • * all endpoints in your flow • */ • @Override • public boolean haveToMockMuleConnectors() { • return true; • } • /** • * Java based Munit test case. Contains mocking and • * invocation of flows and assertions. • */ • @Test • public void validateEchoFlow() throws Exception { • • List<Map<String,Object>> l1 = new ArrayList<Map<String,Object>>();• Map<String,Object> m1 = new HashMap<Srtring,Object>>();• m1.put(“accountid”,”1234”);• l1.add(m1);

Page 23: Mule Munit

• // Mock Database outbound endpoint • whenEndpointWithAddress( "jdbc://Get_ACC_ID" ).thenReturn(new

DefaultMuleMessage(l1, muleContext ) ); • • // Run the Munit test case by passing a test payload • MuleEvent resultEvent = runFlow( " CheckAcctIDFlow ",

testEvent(“request”)); • // The resultEvent contains response from the VM flow • System.out.println( "The flow response is:: " +

resultEvent.getMessage().getPayloadAsString() ); • // Do any assertion here using Assert.equals() for asserting

response // payload • } • }

Page 24: Mule Munit

Benefits

• Create Java based or Mule flow based unit test cases • Mock endpoints (Salesforce, Database, or SAP etc.) to return custom

payloads for unit testing • Dynamically flip/parameterize Munit test cases to Mock payloads or use

real time interfaces • Support functional unit testing similar to Mule Functional test case • Support Assertion through Spy processors and additionally verify flows

using Message verifiers (introspect payload at different flows for flow navigation)

• Support Asynchronous flow processing and request-response processors • Mock without custom database or in memory database • Automate test cases using Maven and generate HTML reports using

Surefire plugins

Page 25: Mule Munit

Conclusion

• When we write test cases using JUnit we can’t mock all mule components and the test case will connect to original connectors(SAP, Salesforce). So to overcome this issue we can use MUnit to write test cases effectively.

Page 27: Mule Munit

About the Author

• Mahesh Yatam