MTG Sub-contractors and suppliers Product Assurance...

INTERNAL THALES ALENIA SPACE

REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012

ISSUE :3 Page : 1/49

All rights reserved, 2012, Thales Alenia Space 100181547K-EN-3

INTERNAL THALES ALENIA SPACE– COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE

MTG

Sub-contractors and suppliers Product

Assurance requirements Document

[DRL code : PA-2 ] [AD code : AD06C-01]

[ PT code : I-10000, S-10000]

Written by Responsibility

T Grassin MTG Product Assurance Manager

Verified by

B Chommeloux Observation, Exploration , Navigation Products Assurance Manager

B Jacquet MTG-I Industrial Manager

Approved by

A Lamothe TAS MTG Project Manager

M Kesselmann OHB MTG Project Manager

Approval evidence is kept within the documentation management system.


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




CHANGE RECORDS

ISSUE DATE § CHANGE RECORDS AUTHOR

01 15/09/10 Reference changes from MTG-TAS-SA-RS-0309 iss1 to MTG-TAS-SY-RS-0309 iss1 §5.12 5.5.11b added §5.17 5.8.1c and NDPA82 added

02 14/12/10 §3.1: Applicable documents NDPA77: issue 3 applicable NDPA81: issue 3 applicable NDPA82: removed ESA PSS 01 612 Issue 1 added §3.2: reference doucments RD1 removed §4.2 Project PA audit 5.2.3h/i/k“TAS and ESA” replaced by “upper level custormers” §4.3 Critical Items 5.2.4d removed §4.5 NCR 5.2.8j removed §4.6 Alert 5.2.9.d1/d2: “MTG Alert systems” replaced by “ESA Alert system and higer level Alert systems” §4.7 PA database / § 4.8 Right of Access 5.2.10c/5.2.11a/b/c : “ESA” replaced by “higher level customers” §4.9 QMS Certification 5.2.12.a version 2000 removed §5.15 Test performance monitoring “higher level” added §5.17 GSE 5.8.1c & 5.8.8c removed §6 Dependability 5.3.2.a remark removed 6.4.2 and 6.4.2.7 removed as covered by ECSS-30-02 tailoring and NDPA-77 Applicability of AD listed in NDPA77 §7 Safety clarification added on 6.2d 6.2.e added §7 Safety 4.1.c: full wording of PARD introduced 6.2.d reference replaced by NDPA-78 §8 EEE 4.3.4d / 4.3.6.e / 4.3.7.f: “Thales” replaced by “higher level customers” 4.1.4.a and Annex D :"Excel preference" replaced by "at least based on Microsoft Excel" §9 Radiation reference to AD19 added §10 PMP 7.3.1.1 PSS01-738 removed

T. Grassin


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




7.3.2.1 issue A of ECSS removed Annex K: applicability per type of product added ECSS-Q-ST-30-11C tailoring introduced ( as per draft issue D ) §11 SW Cat E removed from NDPA-81 Appendix 2: EQSR forms added “TAS” replaced by “higher level Customers”

03 27/03/12 Update according to issue 3.0 of AD06-ESA PARD - §3.1: NDPA100 added - §4.2 req. 5.2.2b: progress report content clarified - §6 req. 5.3.2a: loss of spacecraft as critical - §11 req. 5.6.1.4b: added. OBSW in CatB by

default Correction of NDPA72 reference BDR PA-9 Action ID17840: reference to ECSS-Q-ST-10C moved to § 4 §9 Radiations:

- agreement with ESA on BDR RID PA-14/15/17 added as tailoring of NDPA1

- NDPA100 and AD36C added for clarification Chapter 4.7 req. 5.2.10.c: DCL, DMPL Excel template introduced

T. Grassin


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. SCOPE ................................................................................................................. 6

2. APPLICABILITY .................................................................................................. 6

3. DOCUMENTS ...................................................................................................... 6

3.1 Applicable Documents ......................................................................................................... 6

3.2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS .................................................................................................. 8

4. PRODUCT ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT ........................................................ 9

4.1 PA Programme ...................................................................................................................... 9

4.2 Project PA Audits ................................................................................................................10

4.3 Critical items control and PA interfaces to project risk management ..........................11

4.4 Quality Records ...................................................................................................................11

4.5 Non-conformance Control System ....................................................................................11

4.6 Alert System ........................................................................................................................12

4.7 PA Database ........................................................................................................................13

4.8 Right of Access ...................................................................................................................13

4.9 Quality Management System Certification .......................................................................13

5. QUALITY ASSURANCE .................................................................................... 14

5.1 Handling, Storage, Preservation .......................................................................................14

5.2 Statistical Quality Control and Analysis ...........................................................................14

5.3 Trend Analysis ....................................................................................................................14

5.4 Cleanliness and Contamination Control ...........................................................................14

5.5 Cleanliness Levels ..............................................................................................................15

5.6 . Qualification.......................................................................................................................15

5.7 . Maintenance of Qualification ...........................................................................................15

5.8 . Manufacturing readiness reviews ...................................................................................15


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




5.9 Inspection ............................................................................................................................16

5.10 Workmanship standards ....................................................................................................16

5.11 Manufacturing, Assembly and Integration Records ........................................................16

5.12 ESD .......................................................................................................................................16

5.13 Test Facilities ......................................................................................................................18

5.14 Test Reports ........................................................................................................................18

5.15 Test performance monitoring ............................................................................................18

5.16 Packaging, Marking and Labelling, Transportation ........................................................18

5.17 QA requirements for Ground Support Equipment (GSE) ...............................................19

6. DEPENDABILITY ASSURANCE ....................................................................... 20

7. SAFETY ............................................................................................................. 24

8. EEE COMPONENTS.......................................................................................... 26

9. RADIATIONS ..................................................................................................... 28

10. MATERIALS, PROCESSES, AND MECHANICAL PARTS .............................. 28

11. SOFTWARE PRODUCT ASSURANCE ............................................................. 31

12. OFF-THE-SHELF SPACE EQUIPMENT ........................................................... 32

TABLE OF ANNEX APPENDIX 1 : NON IDENTIFIED OR UNPROVED ROOT CAUSE NCR CHECK LIST ....... 33 APPENDIX 2: EQUIPEMENT QUALIFICATION STATUS REVIEW ..................................... 35


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




1. SCOPE This document defines the Product-Assurance and Safety requirements applicable to the Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) project. The satellites shall be designed, tested, manufactured and operated in compliance with these requirements, which are applicable to the Prime-contractor, sub-contractors and suppliers. It is the responsibility of the subcontractor to tailor these requirements to its own sub-contractors and suppliers and to ensure their implementation.

2. APPLICABILITY The requirements are applicable to the MTG spacecrafts (flight hardware, flight software and flight spares) and the ground support equipments for the MTG project phases B2, C/D.

3. DOCUMENTS

3.1 Applicable Documents The following documents (latest issue at contract signature) shall be applicable with the modifications specified in this document. AD Title Reference

NDPA Title Reference

NDPA 1 Radiation Hardness Requirements, ESA-TEC-QE/2009/22, Issue 1, 20.5.2009

NDPA 2 Verification ECSS-E-10-02C NDPA 3 Fracture Control ECSS-E-ST-32-01C Rev1 NDPA 4 Procurement of printed circuit boards ECSS-E-ST-70-11C NDPA 5 Configuration and Information Management ECSS-M-ST-40C Rev1 NDPA 6 Product Assurance Management ECSS-Q-ST-10C NDPA 7 Critical Item Control ECSS-Q- ST-10-04C NDPA 8 Non-conformance Control System ECSS-Q- ST-10-09C NDPA 9 Quality Assurance ECSS-Q-ST-20C NDPA 10 Quality Assurance for test facilities ECSS-Q-20-07A NDPA 11 Dependability ECSS-Q-ST-30C NDPA 12 Worst case circuit performance analysis ECSS-Q-30-01A

NDPA 13 Failure modes, effects (and criticality) analysis (FMEA/FMECA) ECSS-Q-ST-30-02C As tailored in §6

NDPA 14 Availability analysis ECSS-Q- ST-30-09C NDPA 15 Derating - EEE components ECSS-Q-ST-30-11C As tailored in §6 NDPA 16 Safety ECSS-Q-ST-40C NDPA 17 Hazard Analysis ECSS-Q-ST-40-02C

NDPA 18 Electrical, electronic and electromechanical (EEE) Components ECSS-Q-ST-60C Rev.1

NDPA 19 ESCC qualified part list (https://escies.org) ESCC QPL NDPA 20 ESCC preferred parts list (https://escies.org) ESCC EPPL


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




NDPA Title Reference NDPA 21 ESCC qualified manufacturers list (https://escies.org) ESCC QML

NDPA 22 ESCC Generic Specification for Integrated circuits, monolithic, hermetically sealed ESCC 9000

NDPA 23 ESCC: Component Manufacturer Evaluation ESCC 20200 NDPA 24 ESCC: ESA/SCC Non conformance Control System ESCC 22800

NDPA 25 ESCC Basic Specification: Total Dose Steady-State Irradiation Test Method ESCC 22900

NDPA 26 Minimum requirements for controlling environmental contamination of components ESCC 24900

NDPA 27 Single Event Effects test method and guidelines ESCC 25100 NDPA 28 ASIC and FPGA development ECSS-Q-ST-60-02C

NDPA 29 Generic procurement requirements for hybrid microcircuits ECSS-Q-ST-60-05C

NDPA 30 Design, selection, procurement and use of die form monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs) ECSS-Q-ST-60-12C

NDPA 31 Reliving requirements ECSS-Q-ST-60-14C NDPA 32 Materials, Mechanical Parts and Processes ECSS-Q-ST-70C NDPA 33 Contamination and cleanliness control ECSS-Q-ST-70-01C

NDPA 34 Thermal vacuum outgassing test for the screening of space materials ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C

NDPA 35 Black-anodizing of metals with inorganic dyes ECSS-Q-ST-70-03C

NDPA 36 Thermal testing for the evaluation of space materials, processes, mechanical parts and assemblies ECSS-Q-ST-70-04C

NDPA 37 Detection of organic contamination of surfaces by infrared spectroscopy ECSS-Q-ST-70-05C

NDPA 38 Particle and UV radiation testing for space materials ECSS-Q-ST-70-06C

NDPA 39 Verification and approval of automatic machine wave soldering ECSS-Q-70-07A

NDPA 40 Manual soldering of high-reliability electrical connections ECSS-Q-ST-70-08C

NDPA 41 Measurements of thermo-optical properties of thermal control materials ECSS-Q-ST-70-09C

NDPA 42 Qualification of printed circuit board ECSS-Q-ST-70-10C NDPA 43 Procurement of printed circuit board ECSS-Q-ST-70-11C

NDPA 44 Measurement of the peel and pull-off strength of coatings and finishes using pressures-sensitive tapes ECSS-Q-ST-70-13C

NDPA 45 Preparation, assembly and mounting of RF coaxial cables ECSS-Q-ST-70-18C

NDPA 46 Determination of the susceptibility of silver plated copper wire and cable to “red-plague” corrosion ECSS-Q-ST-70-20C

NDPA 47 Flammability testing for the screening of space materials ECSS-Q-70-21A

NDPA 48 Control of limited shelf-life materials ECSS-Q-ST-70-22C NDPA 49 Crimping of high-reliability electrical connections ECSS-Q-ST-70-26C

NDPA 50 Repair and modification of printed circuit board assemblies for space use ECSS-Q-ST-70-28C

NDPA 51 Wire wrapping of high reliability electrical connections ECSS-Q-ST-70-30C NDPA 52 Application of paints and coatings on space hardware ECSS-Q-ST-70-31C

NDPA 53 Material selection for controlling stress-corrosion cracking ECSS-Q-ST-70-36C

NDPA 54 Determination of the susceptibility of metals to stress corrosion cracking ECSS-Q-ST-70-37C

NDPA 55 High-reliability soldering for surface-mount and mixed technology ECSS-Q-ST-70-38C

NDPA 56 Mechanical testing of metallic materials ECSS-Q-ST-70-45C

NDPA 57 Requirements for manufacturing and procurement of threaded fasteners ECSS-Q-ST-70-46C, Rev1

NDPA 58 Data for selection of space materials and processes ECSS-Q-ST-70-71A, Rev.1 NDPA 59 Software Product Assurance ECSS-Q-ST-80C NDPA 60 Software Engineering ECSS-E-ST-40C


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




NDPA Title Reference

NDPA 61 Preservation, storage, handling and transportation of ESA spacecraft hardware PSS-01-202

NDPA 62 Particulate Contamination Control of Clean Rooms by Particle Fall-out Measurement PSS-01-204

NDPA 63 Capability approval programme for hermetic thin-film hybrid micro circuits PSS-01-605

NDPA 64 Capability approval programme for hermetic thick-film hybrid micro circuits PSS-01-606

NDPA 65 Requirements for ESA approved skills training and certification (Electronic assembly techniques) PSS-01-748

NDPA 66 Guidelines for quality and/or environmental management systems auditing ISO 19011:2002

NDPA 67 Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization (replaces MIL-HDBK-5) DOT/FAA/AR-MMPDS-02

NDPA 68 Proton Launch Vehicle Mission Planner’s Guide Revision 4, March 1999

NDPA 69 CSG Safety Regulations: Volumes and Parts List CSG-RS-09A-CN, Issue 5/Revision 6; 2.12.2002

NDPA 70 CSG Safety Regulations: General Rules Vol 1 CSG-RS-10A-CN, Issue 5/Revision 3; 3.6.2002

NDPA 71 CSG Safety Regulations: Specific Rules Vol 2, Part 1 (Ground Installations)

CSG-RS-21A-CN, Issue 5/Revision 3; 2.12.2002

NDPA 72 CSG Safety Regulations: Specific Rules Vol 2, Part 2 (Spacecraft)

CSG-RS-22A-CN, Issue 5/Revision 4; 2.12.2002

NDPA 73 STARSEM Safety Regulations for Baikonur launch operations, Vol 1 General,

ST-GTD-RDS-001, Issue 01, 18.7.2001

NDPA 74 STARSEM Safety Regulations for Baikonur launch operations, Vol 2 Payload,

ST-GTD-RDS-002, Issue 01, 18.7.2001

NDPA 75 STARSEM Safety Regulations for Baikonur launch operations, Vol 3 Ground Facilities

ST-GTD-RDS-003, Issue 01, 18.7.2001

NDPA 76 Land Launch User’s Guide HPD-19000, Initial Release

NDPA 77 AD06C-02

Standard instruction and data base for Dependability analysis, 100141982F-EN issue 03

NDPA 78 AD06C-03

Detailed Technical Safety Requirement for Flight Hardware and ground support equipment MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0310 iss 1

NDPA 79 Space engineering Space environment ECSS-E-ST-10-04C

NDPA 80 Methods for the calculation of radiation received and its effects, and a policy for design margins

ECSS-E-10-12 issueC

NDPA 81 AD06C-04

MTG Applicability of ECSS-Q-ST-80C for SW categories MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0333 iss 03

NDPA 82 Capability approval programme for Microwave hybrid integrated circuits (MHICs) ESA PSS 01 612 Issue 1

NDPA 100 Power MOSFET SEE assessment TEC-QE-2011-124, dated 14.02.2011

3.2 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS None


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




4. PRODUCT ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT The MTG PA and Safety programme ensures that the MTG spacecrafts and the ground support equipments will successfully achieve the intended objectives. This will be achieved in the most cost-effective way by managing the available resources and personnel within the allocated budget, and by coordinating in an integrated effort the PA activities with the functions of project management and engineering. The MTG PA and safety programme encompasses the various PA disciplines of:

− PA management as per ECSS-Q-ST-10C

− Quality assurance as per ECSS-Q-ST-20C

− Dependability as per ECSS-Q-ST-30C

− Safety as per ECSS-Q-ST-40C

− Electrical, electronic and electromechanical (EEE) Components as per ECSS-Q-ST-60C

− Materials, Mechanical Parts and Processes as per ECSS-Q-ST-70C

− Software Product assurance as per ECSS-Q-ST-80C The requirements are organised in relation to the relevant ECSS Standards. All other ECSS-Q standards are applicable as defined, except if this document provides a detailed tailoring. The supplier shall establish a PA programme according to the requirements of ECSS-Q-ST-10C with the following modification:

4.1 PA Programme

Requirement Applicability Requirement text Change origin

5.1.1a New The supplier PA Manager shall provide the information requested in chapters 5.1.1 and 5.1.2 within the PA plan as per Annex A

ESA

5.1.1b New The supplier PA Manager shall ensure the coverage of PA aspects within his subcontracts’

ESA

5.1.1c New The supplier PA Manager shall ensure the coverage of PA within the technical specifications

ESA

5.1.1d New The supplier PA Manager shall tailor the applicable ECSS-Q requirements for his suppliers

ESA

5.1.1e New The supplier PA Manager shall negotiate with his suppliers the applicable PA requirements

ESA

5.1.1f New The supplier PA Manager shall decide on the usage of standards, handbooks, procedures and tools

ESA


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012





5.1.1g New The supplier PA Manager shall decide on the need for developing of additional standards, handbooks, procedures and tools

ESA

5.1.1h New The supplier PA program shall cover customer furnished items

ESA

5.1.1i New The supplier PA Manager shall audit referenced in-house standards are adequacy for the project

ESA

5.1.1j New The supplier shall ensure PA representation in progress meetings and CCBs.

ESA

5.1.1.2c Modified When the supplier's PA organization delegates product assurance tasks to another organization it shall be done in a documented and controlled way monitored by the PA organization. submitted to the approval of the next higher contractor authority Note1 : The supplier PA organization retains the responsibility towards the customers

ESA TAS

5.1.1.3a: Modified

The supplier PA Manager shall identify, allocate and monitor the PA resources needed to implement the PA program

ESA

5.2.1l Modified

The supplier PA Manager shall accept all products as per DIL during Acceptance or Delivery Reviews

ESA

5.2.2b Modified

The PA progress report shall include as well: • Progress and accomplishment of each major product assurance task including resolved and new problems, future planning of major activities and events • Status of PA reviews, Audits and MIPs, Waiver requests, Non conformances (minor and major), Critical items (including mitigation action plan status), Qualification status, EEE component status, Material and processes status, Alerts status. • Accomplishments during the considered period. • Planned accomplishments in the next reporting period • Activities planned to control identified problems & risk factors • KIPs/MIPs • EQSRs status • Dependability and Safety recommendations • Receiving inspections • List of PA related items put under configuration control • Produced PA documents • Received PA documents • Approved lower level PA documents

ESA

5.2.2d New The periodicity of the PA reporting shall be in compliance with the Statement Of Work (except for NCR list, see § 4.5)

TAS

4.2 Project PA Audits


5.2.3b: Modified The supplier shall establish and maintain an audit plan as per DRD PA-3 for procurement activities on the project, designating the lower tier suppliers to be audited, including the current status and the schedule for auditing.

ESA


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012





5.2.3e New The supplier shall perform and document audits in accordance with ECSS-M-ST-10C Rev 1, chapter 5.2.3, based on the guidelines of ISO 19011:2002.

ESA

5.2.3f New The supplier shall prepare an audit checklist for each intended audit as per DRD PA-4.

ESA

5.2.3g New The audit checklist for the intended audit shall be provided to the customer for approval 10 days before the audit.

ESA

5.2.3h New The supplier shall notify upper level customers, at least ten working days in advance, of the intention to conduct an audit (external or internal)

ESA

5.2.3i New A copy of the audit report (as per DRD PA-4) shall be sent to upper level customers within 2 weeks after the audit has taken place

ESA TAS

5.2.3j New The audit report shall comply with DRD PA-4 ESA 5.2.3k New. The supplier shall accept audits by upper level customers

initiated in accordance to above requirements ESA TAS

5.2.3l New. The supplier shall provide evidence that audits are performed for its suppliers not certified ISO 9001 Standard or assessed upon EN/AS/JISQ/9100 or in case of change of manufacturing location and in case of problems.

TAS

4.3 Critical items control and PA interfaces to project risk management


4.4 Quality Records


5.2.6a Modified The supplier shall establish and maintain quality records for software , based on the Product Assurance File definition of ECSS-E-ST-40C, Annex A, to provide objective evidence of complete and successful performance of all PA discipline tasks and to demonstrate compliance with requirements.

ESA

4.5 Non-conformance Control System


5.2.8b New The supplier shall provide visibility to TAS and ESA of all project NCR using the web based NCTS database throughout the industrial organisation. Note: More detailed requirements can be found in ECSS-Q-ST-10-09C

ESA


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012





5.2.8c New The periodicity of the NCR (minor and major) reporting shall be monthly and when a manufacturing/test review or Mandatory Inspection Point occurs.

TAS

5.2.8e New This reporting shall include the lower-tier suppliers reporting TAS 5.2.8f New The reporting shall be in English for major NCR TAS 5.2.8g New A dedicated methodology for failure cause analysis shall be

implemented to justify the identification of anomaly root cause and submitted to the Customer for approval

TAS

5.2.8h New For non identified or unproved root cause (such as, but not limited to, one times failures which cannot be repeated), Check list (in appendix1) shall be processed, checked and submitted to the Customer for approval

TAS

5.2.8k New The Customer shall be notified of any non conformance occurring on other programs (on ground or in orbit) when it becomes available to the supplier knowledge if those non conformance may affect hardware or software of the contract

TAS

4.6 Alert System


5.2.9b Modified The supplier PA manager shall investigate in cooperation with the originator of the failure or problem to define the immediate measures to be taken, to identify the causes, and to recommend corrective actions for similar items.

ESA

5.2.9c Not Applicable

ESA

5.2.9c1 New The supplier PA manager shall ensure the assessment of any failure having the potential to lead to an alert by the customer

ESA

5.2.9c2 New The supplier PA manager shall ensure the investigation, until disposition of the items subject of the potential alert

ESA

5.2.9c3 New The supplier PA manager shall ensure the assessment of incoming alerts for the definition, implementation and follow-up of necessary actions.

ESA

5.2.9d Not Applicable

5.2.9d1 New The supplier shall participate in the upper level customers Alert systems and ESA Alert system, by assessment of the impact of incoming alerts to project work, and definition, implementation and follow-up of necessary corrective actions at any contractual level

ESA TAS

5.2.9d2 New The supplier shall participate in the upper level customers Alert systems and ESA Alert system, by distribution of incoming alerts to the possible affected users within the project

ESA TAS

5.2.9e New The supplier shall ensure that all lower tier suppliers participate to the MTG Alert Systems, too.

ESA TAS

5.2.9f New The supplier shall distribute all MTG Alerts to the lower tier suppliers and shall established a procedure for collecting and assessing inputs from lower tier suppliers to provide inputs to the MTG Alert Systems.

ESA TAS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012





5.2.9g New. The supplier shall maintain an Alert status list as per DRD PA-10 and deliver as defined in the DRL

ESA

5.2.9h New Alerts coming from others sources than ESA and TAS and known as applicable to MTG by the suppliers shall be communicated to TAS.

TAS

5.2.9i New. Alerts affecting the project shall be processed through the Project non conformance system.

TAS

4.7 PA Database


5.2.10a New All PA-related data and PA documents as per DRL (such as RFW/RFD, DCLs, PADs, DMPLs, materials, mechanical parts and processes lists, reliability/safety analysis, pictures…) shall be stored in an electronic database

ESA

5.2.10b New

The import and export data from and to sub-contractors/customers and ESA shall at least be based on Microsoft Excel.

ESA

5.2.10c Modified

The database format and content shall be agreed with higher level customers. Excel Templates for DCL, DML, DPL and DMPL will be provided by the customer

ESA TAS

4.8 Right of Access


5.2.11a New higher level customers reserve the right of access to: 1: all data and documentation relevant to the programme; 2: all areas and operations within the Prime-contractor, subcontractors or suppliers facilities in which work is performed or items are stored relevant to the project, even if the information is considered proprietary.

ESA TAS

5.2.11b New higher level customers reserve the right to perform or participate in any or all audits, surveys, inspections, reviews, etc. relevant to the project.

ESA TAS

5.2.11c New. higher level customers participation shall not in any way replace or relieve the contractor of his responsibilities

ESA TAS

4.9 Quality Management System Certification


5.2.12a New The Quality Management System (QMS) of the supplier and its sub-suppliers shall be certified ISO 9001 and/or assessed upon EN/AS/JISQ/9100 A copy of QMS certification and/or assessment will be delivered to the Customer

TAS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




5. QUALITY ASSURANCE The requirements of ECSS-Q-ST-20C shall apply with the following modifications.

5.1 Handling, Storage, Preservation


5.2.7.4a New The supplier shall implement the detailed requirements for handling, storage and preservation of PSS-01-202.

ESA

5.2 Statistical Quality Control and Analysis


5.2.8.1a Not applicable

ESA

5.2.8.1b Not applicable

ESA

5.2.8.1c Not applicable

ESA


ESA

5.2.8.2b Not applicable

ESA

5.3 Trend Analysis


5.2.8.3a New Trend analysis shall be organized dealing with the whole Product Line and accessible concerning : - key characteristics ( EN/AS/JISQ/ 9100) - key parameters of manufacturing and inspection The PA shall verify that any abnormal change from the nominal tendency even within the specified limits, shall be identified and analyzed. Content, format of trend analysis and exportable data's selection shall be agreed with the Customer

TAS

5.4 Cleanliness and Contamination Control 5.5.7.1b New The supplier shall identify the hardware and facilities that

require specific controls for molecular or particulate contamination

ESA


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




5.5 Cleanliness Levels

5.5.7.2c new The allowed particulate and molecular contamination levels shall be agreed with the instrument providers, based on acceptable performance losses

ESA

5.6 . Qualification


5.3.2.4.1d New In the early phase of the program, a dedicated review Equipment Qualification Status Review (EQSR) shall be held in line with EQSR procedure (see Appendix 2 ) in accordance with SOW.

TAS

5.7 . Maintenance of Qualification


5.3.2.4.5b New Any evolution of qualification status (including but not limited to design, process, material, components, tooling, procedures ...) shall be reported through Change Proposal System, justified and approved by Customer before implementation.

TAS

5.3.2.4.5c New In case of modification on flight hardware with respect to the hardware for which the qualification has been declared (e.g FM versus QM), a complete and exhaustive description of modification implemented (e.g design, materials, processes, EEE components changes) shall be provided including rationale for their acceptance.

TAS

5.8 . Manufacturing readiness reviews


5.5.2c New MRR shall apply before qualification model manufacturing or before manufacturing of the first flight standard product. NOTE : MRR application will be confirmed at KOM, EQSR or QR

TAS

5.5.2d New Authorization for the manufacture of relevant model shall be granted on completion of each close-out design review report. NOTE : MRR Customer participation will be as specified in the SOW

TAS

5.5.2e New MRR shall also evaluate systematically availability of resources (personnel & tools), parts, mechanical and materials

TAS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




5.9 Inspection


5.5.8h Modified A MIP shall require an invitation five working days in advance with the agreed notice before the event, and the participation of the customer, or their written agreement to proceed without their participation

TAS

5.5.8j New. The supplier shall define all KIPs and MIPs within a MIP/KIP list as per DRD PA-9, which shall be maintained throughout the life cycle to document the status achieved

ESA

5.5.8k New. In case of customer MIP delegation to the supplier QA, the KIP/MIP report shall be provided to the customer 48 hours after the KIP/MIP

ESA

5.5.8l New. The MIP notice shall include at least the following items : - Flow chart reference, - Hardware identification including revisions (as design PN or drawing reference) - Manufacturing assembly process reference (if not configured through the AS-design) - Major / Minor NCR & RFW list as per MIP notification date.

TAS

5.5.8m New. The MIPs and KIPs shall be identified on the manufacturing and Inspection flow chart.

TAS

5.5.8n New. The MIP reports shall be delivered to the Customer TAS 5.5.8o New. The KIP reports shall be delivered upon Customer request TAS 5.5.8p New. The KIP/MIP shall be performed by Supplier Product

Assurance TAS

5.10 Workmanship standards


5.5.4d New Workmanship standards shall be in accordance with recognized international standards/procedures or to procedures approved by Customer.

TAS

5.11 Manufacturing, Assembly and Integration Records


5.5.10b New Pictures shall be taken of the inside and outside of all flight units.

ESA

5.5.10c New. Pictures shall be taken of both sides of all PCBs prior to coating

ESA

5.5.10d New All pictures shall be maintained in the PA database and included in the relevant EIDP.

ESA

5.12 ESD



REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




5.5.11a New Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Control shall be implemented for manufacturing, storage, inspection, assembly and tests activities.

TAS

5.5.11b New The Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Control shall be compliant to the European Standard IEC61340-5-1 :Electrostatic - Part 5.1- Protection of electronic device from electrostatic phenomena – General requirements.

TAS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




5.13 Test Facilities


5.6.1a Modified. The supplier shall ensure that test facilities for System or Subsystem test , either internal or external, are ESA certified to ECSS-Q-20-07A or subjected to ESA formal auditing process .

ESA TAS

5.6.1b New The Contractor shall ensure that test facilities are suitably qualified to perform the tests to be conducted, and do not cause any degradation to the test article or its interface.

ESA

5.14 Test Reports


5.6.3.2a Modified The supplier shall ensure that all tests are documented in test reports as per ECSS-E-ST-10-02C, Annex C.

ESA

5.6.3.2b Modified The supplier PA manager shall review and approve all test reports.

ESA

5.15 Test performance monitoring


5.6.4h New Furthermore, traceability and validity of tests equipment’s shall be recorded. higher level customers may witness tests activities.

TAS

5.16 Packaging, Marking and Labelling, Transportation


5.7.4.1a Modified Detailed requirements of PSS-01-202 for packing, marking and labeling and transportation shall apply.

ESA


ESA


ESA


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




5.17 QA requirements for Ground Support Equipment (GSE)


5.8.1 to 5.8.9 Not applicable

ESA

5.8.1a New The contractor shall define a quality assurance program for GSE items based on chapters 5.1 to 5.7 of ECSS-Q-ST-20C as tailored above

ESA

5.8.1b New The supplier shall certify that all ground equipments comply to national and European law (e.g. CE labelling) and shall label each equipment accordingly

ESA

5.8.8b New Hardware container shall be considered as part of MGSE and shall meet specific design requirements and Subsystem verifications with respect of shock, humidity and temperature

TAS

5.8.8c New The GSE shall be compatible with flight hardware, designed and manufactured in compliance with PA requirements such as safety, cleanliness and calibration

TAS

5.8.8d New No single failure shall propagate to the flight hardware, TAS 5.8.8e New Adequate protections for the flight hardware shall be

implemented and their efficiency shall be verified during GSE validation.

TAS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




6. DEPENDABILITY ASSURANCE The requirements of ECSS-Q-ST-30C shall apply with the following modifications.

5.3.2.a Table 5-1

Modified MTG severity classification shall be assigned to each identified failure mode as: 1- Catastrophic:

- Loss of life or life-threatening - Permanently disabling injury or occupational illness - Loss of launcher, launch site facilities, - Loss of public or private property, - Long-term detrimental environmental effects

2 - Critical: - Loss of spacecraft - Loss of mission or unacceptable degradation of mission

performance - Temporary disabling but no-life-threatening injury, or

temporary occupational illness - Major damage to private or public property, or ground facilities - Short term detrimental environment effects

3 - Major: - Mission degradation

4 - Minor or Negligible: - Other less minor events

ESA

5.3.3.c New Single point failures which cannot be eliminated from the design with reasonable effort (or fault tolerance requirements which cannot be met) shall be summarized with a detailed rationale within the Critical Items list and shall be subject to customer approval.

ESA

5.3.3.d New Exceptions shall be submitted for ESA approval and shall be reflected in the MTG user manuals Note: Additional failure tolerance requirements may be defined by the Launch Authority or by the applicable safety regulations

ESA

Furthermore, the applicability of ECSS Q ST 30 C requirements versus type of product (done according to Annex K of this ECSS std) is as follows :

Annex K New All requirements apply to hardware of satellite and on board equipment, ground system and on ground equipment, space infrastructure and transportation, with following exceptions : - 6.4.2.1 and Annex E (Reliability prediction), 6.4.2.2 (Fmea), 6.4.2.6

(CCA) : N/A for ground system and equipment - 6.4.2.9 and Annex G (Zonal analysis) : N/A - 6.4.2.3 (HSIA) : applicable for SW (A, B, C, and D upon request)

only. The HSIA is conducted when implemented SW is involved within the FDIR process.

- 6.4.2.4 and Annex D (contingency analysis) : applies to satellite only.

- 6.4.2.7 and Annex J (WCA), 6.4.2.8 (PSA) : applicable to on board electrical equipment only

- 6.4.2.10 and Annex F (FDIR) : N/A for ground system and on ground equipment.

- 6.4.3 and 7.3 and Annex H (Maintainability) : N/A

TAS

In addition the AD06C-02_NDPA77 which contains instructions and data bases for Dependability analysis shall be applied. For Applicable documents AD1,2,5,7,8 listed in


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




NDPA77, NDPAs as listed in §3.1 and tailored by present document shall be considered instead. Tailoring of the ECSS Q ST 30 02 C dated 06 March 2009 (FMEA/FMECA) :

Modified All the requirements related to : − FMEA (chapter 4) − HSIA (chapter 7) − Annexes A (for FMEA), B and D

shall apply.

TAS

Tailoring of the ECSS Q ST 30 09 C dated 31 July 2008 (Availability ) : Fully applicable. Tailoring of the ECSS Q ST 30 11 C dated 31 July 2008 (Derating rules ) : The ECSS-Q-ST-30-11C shall be fully applicable to On board equipment with the modification as presented following table. This tailoring will be replaced by ECSS-Q-ST-30-11D when issued

§ Requirement Text Tailoring Status

Product Type

5.4.2. a Derating parameters – requirements By default , requirement 5.4.2.b applies, which is generally more conservative. In case of non compliance to 5.4.2.b, the compliance to 5.4.2.a shall be verified.

Modified On Board equipment

5.4.2. c Derating parameters – requirements Repetitive transients are included in the Max operating conditions. The steady state derating shall be applied which is more conservative.


6.2.1.

d Capacitors : ceramic - general Note : the power dissipated in the capacitor is taken into account for thermal analysis. The good practice in design is to limit dissipated power. This applies to all types of capacitors.


6.2.2

Capacitors : ceramic - derating For High Voltage parts > 500V in EPC 60% shall be applied


6.3.1. e Capacitors : solid tantalum – general Cannot generally be applied as it is not specified in the part specification. The increase of temperature due to ripple power is considered for the computation of the case temperature (ref to 6.3.1.f)



REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




6.4.1. b Capacitors : solid tantalum- non solid tantalum - general Same as requirement 6.3.1.e


6.5.1.

a. Capacitors : films - general The short circuit effect is analysed in the FMEA. The self-healing requirement is analysed only when the effects of short-circuit must be avoided.


6.5.1. b. Capacitors : films – general Same as requirement 6.5.1.a


6.11.1. a. Connectors : general The risk of short circuit can be reduced by assigning female connectors on power generation distribution side.


6.11.1. c. Connectors : general

Shall be covered at System level during AIT. At unit level : visual control, with a double check procedure.


6.12.2

Connectors RF : Derating : RF Power : 50% of maximum rated power. Maximum operating temperature : 5°C below maximum rated temperature.


6.14.2.1

Diode (signal/switching, rectifier, transient suppression, varactor, pin, Schottky, step recovery) Instead of requirement on forward surge current Ifsm, 75% shall be applied on Forward current If which is more conservative. Clause is not applicable for transient suppressors which is transferred to under clause 6.14.2.2


6.14.2.2

Diode (Zener, reference) 65% derating shall be applied on the dissipated power which is sufficient to insure that Zener diodes are working in a safe area. This clause becomes applicable to transient suppressors which have been removed from clause 6.14.2.1



REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




6.15.2

Diodes : RF/microwave- PIN - derating The 50% derating shall be applied to the specified maximum operating forward current instead of the surge current.


6.25.1

a.Relays and switches - general Coil voltage between 110% of the latch/reset voltage and the maximum coil voltage shall be applied.


6.25.1

b. Relays and switches – general The minimum coil pulse duration for latching relays shall be 3 times the latch time (tL) or 40 ms, whichever is greater.


6.25.2

Relays and switches - derating For surge duration > 10µs the rule shall be : I²t < 16 Ir² * 10-5 (A².s)


6.26.1.8

Resistors – pulse power rating a and b single Formula not acceptable and dangerous for the part for large value of T (typically greater than 1s) For large value of T, clause 5.4.2.b relative to non-repetitive transients shall be applied.


6.26.1.9

a. Refer to 5.4.2.a and 5.4.2.b


6.26.1.9

b. Refer to 5.4.2.a and 5.4.2.b


6.30.2 For specific RF applications (high frequency) Ib max can be determined by substantiated tests. For AsGa technology with Tj max >=150°C, 115°C derating shall be applied.


6.31.2

Transistors RF FET - derating For GaAs technologies with TjMax = 150°C, derating applied shall be 115°C. Note :overdrive conditions covered by the WCA


6.32.1

Wires and Cables - general Wire surface temperature : manufacturer’s maximum rating Tmax -50°C Item “a” : removed. Item “b” : the derating on current for bundles with N wires is calculated as follows IBW = ISW × K for ambient temperature of 40°C. In case of wires in cold redundancy or wires non used in the same bundle (one with current, the other without current) the number of wires to take into account is calculated as follows : N equivalent bundle = N wires with current + 0,5 x N wires without current with IBW which shall not overpass ISW.


6.34.2

RF passive components - derating RF Power : rule shall be 50% of maximum rated power. Maximum operating temperature : rule shall be 5°C below maximum rated temperature.



REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




7. SAFETY The requirements of ECSS-Q-ST-40C shall apply as tailored within ECSS-Q-ST-40C Annex F for satellites and with the following modifications. 5.1a Modified The supplier shall establish and maintain a safety program to

assure conformance with project safety policy and requirements in order to protect: • Ground personnel; • The launch vehicle (including other launcher payloads); • Ground support equipment; • Public and private properties; • The environment from hazards associated with the MTG hardware/software and operations.

ESA

5.1.c

New All ground equipment shall ‘CE’ marked and be supplied with a supporting ‘Declaration of Conformity’ and User Manual detailing all safety warnings. Note: Details can be found in Annex G of ECSS-Q-ST-40C

ESA

5.1.d New The supplier shall deliver the documentation requested by the launch authorities’ safety requirements for Ariane 5, Soyouz (Kourou), Proton and Land Launch, and the applicable international and national safety regulations (i.e. during manufacturing, integration, testing, handling and transportation).

ESA

5.1.e New The Safety data packages shall cover the complete Satellite (Platform and Payload) as well as any Ground Support equipment to be used at the launch site.

ESA

5.1.f New The supplier shall identify and plan all activities (including provision of documentation) required to obtain approval from the launch authority.

ESA

5.1.g New The supplier shall ensure that for testing and general handling of the spacecraft at third party premises the required GSE has a valid calibration/acceptance certification.

ESA

5.2.a Modified The supplier shall establish and maintain a safety programme plan in conformance with the DRD in ECSS-Q-ST-40C Annex B as part of the overall PA plan.

ESA TAS

6.2.c New It is the responsibility of the supplier to impose all relevant requirements on his low tier and to ensure that those requirements are implemented on time and to the extent possible.

TAS

6.2.d New The Detailed Technical Safety Requirements for Flight Hardware and Ground Support Equipment, defining the detailed technical safety requirements to be implemented are provided in NDPA-78. Note: NDPA78 req. 81: Beryllium Oxide shall not be used as required in §10 - 5.2.2.a NDPA78 req. 21: for clarification, at least 1 inhibit independent of SW shall be implemented

TAS

6.2.e New For ground support equipment, design shall be safe in case of loss of external services such as power, cooling , gas

KT

6.5.6.1 New Note: Alternatively approach should be to implement hardware inhibitions acting on inhibits such as launcher/spacecraft separation breakwires in order that software failure may only remove one inhibit.

TAS

7.2.e New If the hazard causes (and the associated controls) are not under TAS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




the Supplier control, they have to be documented in the safety analyses for being taken into account at a higher level.

7.2.f New The safety analysis shall be performed for ground operations and for flight operations up to the separation from the launcher.

TAS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




8. EEE COMPONENTS The requirements of ECSS-Q-ST-60C, Rev1 shall apply with the following modifications Requirement # Applicability Requirement text Requirement # Applicability Requirement text Origin 4.1.2.2a Modified The supplier shall prepare a Component Control Plan (CCP)

in conformance with its DRD in Annex A as part of the DRD PA -1

ESA

4.1.4.a Modified The supplier shall establish and maintain a consolidated ”as design” and “as built” Declared Components Lists (DCLs) at his level of responsibility The content of these DCLs shall be compliant with ECSS-Q-ST-60C, Rev1, and Annex B –DRD and with the following additional information.

• For the “as built “DCLs at Equipment level , the DCL shall refer to the Equipement name and Serial number.

• For the consolidated “ as built “ DCL at Sub-system

level, the “as built “DCL shall include one field with the name of the Equipment and one field with its serial number

All DCLs shall be provided in Electronic format at least based on Microsoft Excel.

ESA TAS

4.2.1b New Only Class 1 components shall be used within MTG. Note: applicable to flight hardware and related interfaces

ESA

4.2.1c New The procurement of components and/or units subject to stringent export licence regulations such as ITAR shall be avoided,

ESA

4.2.1d New The procurement of components/units from non European/ Canadian sources shall be minimised.

ESA

4.2.1e New If retained, such procurements shall be handled via RFD/RFW process. Note: The justification for the selection shall form part of the RFD/RFW.

ESA

4.2.1f New The approval of the RFD/RFW shall be a prerequisite for the respective PAD approval by the Agency.

ESA

4.2.4.d.1a New The DCL shall identify in addition to Annex B the following procurement details: • Procurement inspections by customer (pre-cap inspection, etc), if any; • Single Event Effects Linear Energy Transfer (SEE LET) threshold and/or total dose sensitivity level (when applicable); • In case of procurement from stock, the date of re-lifing activities.

ESA

4.2.2.3b Modified For parts not selected from the EPPL part I, the following sources shall be considered in the following order of precedence:

1. EPPL part II (when compatible with the project

ESA


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




requirements)

2. ESCC QPL and QML,

3. NPSL level 1 (with disposition of the associated application notes)

MIL QPL's and QML's

4.2.2.4j New The radiation hardness assurance requirements of NDPA 1shall apply.

TAS

4.2.2.4k New The planning for the coverage of the requirements of ESA-TECQE/2009/22, Issue 1, 20.5.2009 RADIATION HARDNESS REQUIREMENTS shall be part of the overall PA plan as per DRDPA-1

ESA

4.3.1h New The supplier shall define attrition rules to be applied for customer approval within the PCB.

ESA

4.3.4d New higher level customers will reserve the right to participate to Initial customer source inspection (precap) with the procurement entity

TAS

4.3.6e New higher level customers will reserve the right to participate to Final customer source inspection (buy-off ) with the procurement entity

TAS

4.3.7f New higher level customers will reserve the right to participate to Incoming inspections at procurement entity premises.

TAS

4.6.6 New EEPROMs and EEPROMs Flash. 100% of flight devices shall be submitted to data retention tests over the full temperature range.

TAS

5 Not applicable

ESA

6 Not applicable

ESA

Annex D, table D-1

New The supplier, at his level of responsibility shall provide • PAD sheet in paper form for approval / PCBs

purposes and • An electronic file (at least based on Microsoft Excel)

containing for each PAD sheet their field contents for MTG System, EEE data base maintenance .

TAS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




9. RADIATIONS For the Radiation Environment the following documents shall be applicable :

− Environmental Specification, MTG-ESA-SA-RS-0055, AD-19 − MTG Satellite Environmental Design and Test Requirements Specification,

MTG-TAF-SA-SS-0174, AD-36C − Space engineering Space environment ECSS-E-ST-10-04C from 15 November 2008

(NDPA 79) − Methods for the calculation of radiation received and its effects, and a policy for

design margins ECSS E-10-12 issue C from November, 2008 (NDPA 80) − NDPA100 on Power MOSFET SEE assessment - For The Radiation Hardness requirement the ESA-TEC-QE/2009/22, Issue 1, 20.5.2009 (NDPA 1) document shall be applicable with the following modifications

5.1.e modified Devices that contain bipolar transistors (e.g. BICMOS) shall be tested at a dose rate below 360 rad/h.

ESA/TAS

5.3.x added Use of SET template is agreed as first step of analysis. If criticity, test will be conducted in order to calculate the rate.

ESA/TAS

Annex A A.2.1<2>d

modified The radiation analysis report shall present TIDL and TIDS for each part as well as RDM. When margin is included within the deposited dose level, ratio between calculated deposited dose and design dose level taken into account in worst case analysis shall be provided in the radiation report.

ESA/TAS

10. MATERIALS, PROCESSES, AND MECHANICAL PARTS ECSS-Q-ST-70C shall be applicable with the following modifications or additions. Nota: for new requirements where NASA and MIL standards are given in addition to ECSS, ECSS shall be applied for European suppliers; NASA or MIL standards are only applicable to potential US suppliers. 5.1.4c New When relevant out-gassing data are not available (e.g. obsolete

if test conducted more than 10 years ago, new material, new mixing, new curing,, or unacceptable because missing information such as report reference or insufficient materials/processes description), out-gassing test shall be carried out as per ECSS-Q-ST-70-02C.

ESA

5.2.1c2 New The supplier shall obtain ESA approval for the usage of equivalent standards from MIL system or NASA.

ESA

5.2.2.a: Modified The following materials shall not be used: pure tin (ECSS-Q-ST-70-71A, Clause 5.4.8), mercury, cadmium, zinc coatings, beryllium oxide, radioactive materials and PVC. Note: This applies also to any support equipment used in a

ESA


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




vacuum chamber 7.3.1.1 New High reliability connections

ECSS-Q-ST-70-08C (The manual soldering of high-reliability connections), ECSS-Q-ST-70-26C (The crimping of high-reliability connections) or CNES/QFT/SP.0050.6 Ed 2 (Spécification de réalisation de sertissages), ECSS-Q-ST-70-18C (The preparation, assembly, and mounting of RF coax cables), ECSS-Q-ST-70-38C (High-reliability soldering for surface mount and mixed technology printed circuit boards), ECSS-Q-70-07A (Wave soldering) or NASA-STD-8739.3 Change 2 (Soldered electrical connections), NASA-STD-8739.4 Initial issue (Crimping, interconnecting cables, harnesses, and wiring), NAS 5300.4 (3M) Initial issue (Workmanship standard for surface mount technology) are applied for high reliability connections.

TAS

7.3.1.2 New ECSS-Q-ST-70-28C (The repair and modification of PCB and solder joints for space use) or MIL-PRF-55110 F (Printed wiring boards, rigid, general specification for) is applied for repair and modification of PCB assemblies (as a guideline for the number of repairs, reworks and modifications)..

TAS

7.3.2.1 New Printed Circuits Boards ECSS-Q-ST-70-10C (The qualification of printed circuit boards), ECSS-Q-ST-70-11C (The procurement of printed circuit boards) or MIL-PRF-55110 F (Printed wiring boards, rigid, general specification for), MIL-P-50884 C Amendment 4 (Printed-wiring, flexible and rigid-flex) respectively are applied for qualification and procurement of printed circuit boards.

TAS

7.3.2.2 New (Return of Experience)

For high electric field applications, IPC 2221 (§ 6.3 “Electrical clearance”) requirements shall be applied with a minimum clearance of 70 µm between conductive layers (Z axis)

TAS

7.3.3 New Conformal coating Conformal coating is used on PCB assemblies according to NASA-STD-8739.1 (Workmanship standard for stacking and conformal coating of printed wiring boards and electronic assemblies) used as guidelines or customer approved document for qualification and implementation. Duly justified deviation only for performances aspects is accepted.

TAS

7.3.4.1 New In house manufactured hybrids In house hybrids are manufactured in a validated hybrid line according to ESA PSS 01 605 Issue 1 (Capability approval programme for hermetic thin-film hybrid microcircuits), ESA PSS 01 606 Issue 1 (Capability approval programme for hermetic thick-film hybrid microcircuits), ESA PSS 01 612 Issue 1 (Capability approval programme for Microwave hybrid integrated circuits (MHICs)), or alternate document approved by the Customer or by the Qualifying Authority.

TAS

7.3.4.2 New Lot acceptance test or element evaluation of active and passive dice are conducted according to ECSS-Q-ST-60-05C Rev1 (Generic procurement requirement for hybrid microcircuits) or alternate document approved by the Customer or by the Qualifying Authority.

TAS

7.3.4.3 New Screening of hybrids on a 100% sampling basis are implemented according to level 1 of ECSS-QST--60-05C Rev1 (Generic procurement requirement for hybrid microcircuits) or or class K of MIL-PRF-38534 E (Hybrid microcircuits, general specification for) or alternate screening approved by the

TAS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




Customer or by the Qualifying Authority. 7.3.4.4 New Lot acceptance test of hybrids are conducted according to

ECSS-Q-ST-60-05C Rev1 (Generic procurement requirement for hybrid microcircuits) or MIL-PRF-38534 E (Hybrid microcircuits, general specification for) or alternate document approved by the Customer or by the Qualifying Authority.

TAS

7.3.5.1 New In house manufactured magnetic parts (coils and transformers) In house magnetic parts are designed and screened using MIL STD 981 B (Design, manufacturing and quality standards for custom electromagnetic devices for space applications) as a guideline.

TAS

7.3.5.2 New Minimum screening on a 100% sampling basis is : visual inspection, electrical measurements before test, thermal cycling (minimum 25 cycles), high temperature storage (minimum 96 h) and final electrical measurements.

TAS


Black anodizing Black anodizing is forbidden on 2000 and 7000 series of aluminium alloys.

TAS


For other aluminium alloys, verification shall be performed according to the application conditions

TAS


PTFE insulated cables PTFE-polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) and other non treated fluorocarbons materials are sensitive to cold flow. The use of wires with insulation made from these materials is prohibited. Duly justified deviation could be accepted (for example if it is demonstrated that workmanship prevents from cold flow (controlled bend radii, no contact with sharp object, wire fixation rules …)).

TAS


The use of irradiated ETFE-ethylenetetrafluoroethylène (TEFZEL) wires with improved characteristics against cold flow is accepted.

TAS

7.3.8 New (Return of Experience)

Potting of cables Electrical wires or cables insulated or coated with fluorocarbons shall be etched prior to potting to ensure mechanical bond strength and environmental seal. The open end of the wire shall not be exposed to the etchant.

TAS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




11. SOFTWARE PRODUCT ASSURANCE ECSS Q ST 80C as tailored by NDPA-81 is applicable, completed and modified by the following : 5.6.1.4a New The supplier shall define and maintain a declared software tool

list for each software product in the MTG product tree as per DRD PA-38

ESA

5.6.1.4b New All flight software shall be developed according to CAT B software requirements until the supplier has provided a justification that the software belongs to a lower Category and the justification is approved by the Agency

ESA


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




12. OFF-THE-SHELF SPACE EQUIPMENT Requirement Applicability Requirement text Change

origin 11.1a New The supplier shall submit an Off-the-Shelf Item List.

Note: An "Off the Shelf" item is an item originally developed for a different project (though possibly with a common or generic application) which has been selected for reuse in the current project.

ESA

11.1b New For each OTS item intended to be used the supplier shall demonstrate full compliance to MTG requirements

ESA

11.1c New The supplier shall establish an OTS Item Suitability File for each selected OTS item.

ESA

11.1d New This OTS Item Suitability File shall contain at least: • MTG Technical Specification identifying the MTG requirements for the product element of the MTG product Tree, • Justification File clearly identifying any non compliance between the MTG requirements and the actual characteristics/performances of the item, • Delta Activities Program describing all necessary tasks to be performed to verify the fulfilment of the MTG requirements, if any, • OTS Item Suitability Report presenting the results of the Delta Activities and demonstrating the full suitability of the OTS Item • All results of the EQSR of the item

ESA

11.1e New For each OTS Item, a dedicated Equipment Qualification Status Review (EQSR) shall be held to determine - the category of the OTS item with respect to ECSS-E-10-02C, Table 5-1 and - the necessary (delta) qualification approach within MTG

ESA

11.1f New The supplier shall invite TASF and ESA to the EQSR at least 10 working days in advance

ESA TAS

11.1g New The supplier shall document the results of the EQSR and the information shall be covered within the OTS item Suitability File

ESA

11.1h New This OTS Item Equipment Qualification Status Review (EQSR) shall take place not later than the PDR for the next higher assembly level

ESA

11.1i New The supplier shall provide a dedicated OTS plan for each selected OTS item at the PDR for the next higher assembly level for the final make or buy decision.

ESA

11.1j New The Delta qualification Activities Program as defined during the EQSR shall be completed prior to the qualification review of the next higher assembly level.

ESA

11.1k New The supplier shall describe the overall approach for reuse within his PA plan

ESA


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




Appendix 1 : Non identified or unproved root cause NCR check list The following points shall be checked: 1- define as precisely as possible what was the failure: list all significant events leading up to the occurrence of the failure 2- conduct troubleshooting using a fault tree or fish bone to isolate as much as possible the source of the failure 3- based on FMECA, identify functional blocks which could generate the failure, up to part or interconnection level if possible. 4- define tentative test sequence to confirm the existence and signature of the failure 5- swap identified possible areas in order to confirm as much as possible the failure location 6- when suspected failure mode is understood, try to simulate or reproduce it on mock-up/bread-board device in order to verify the rightness of trouble shooting find-outs. Repeat the 6 above points as much as necessary. 7- review the log sheet and traveler of the considered item in order to detect any possible event which could be linked to the observed anomaly. 8- review item travelers contents to detect any traced event which could have led up to the failure 9- review the hardware and software configuration in use at the time of the failure 10- review test data of similar items for previous non detected occurrence of the failure 11- conduct an analysis of potential overstress resulting from the failure, and initiate action to correct all potential overstressed elements 12- if the failure was traced to a part, conduct DPA and verify that DPA confirm the failure 13- validate repair program and retest sequence 14- try to define what is the most probable cause of the failure and initiate corrective/preventive actions (so as, but not limited to) such as to replace or modify each area (internal or external to the concerned item) where the failure could develop in order to reduce the probability of a reoccurrence 15- identify all other items in production , that possess the potential of a similar failure and initiate same rework actions as conducted on the failed item. 16- identify status of all items built/delivered that possess the potential to develop a similar failure : on the shelf . installed on spacecraft (at which state,…) 17- estimate how likely is the occurrence of the failure during the mission, give the rationale used for this determination, probability if possible. 18- if intervention is possible evaluate the programmatic impacts at any step during the spacecraft program and during its mission (repeater, sub-system, system,….) and take dispositions accordingly 19- evaluate the consequence of a worst case scenario of this failure recurring during the mission in accordance with the following criteria:

− mission loss − mission degradation − loss of redundancy


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




− degraded data or payload − performance − reduced data or payload performance − partial loss of redundancy − change to mission operation − no impact

20- if failure disposition are not fully satisfactory compared to the associated risks, evaluate the programmatic impacts if further action, not performed due to cost or schedule concerns, could result in an increased level of confidence, communicate recommendation to program office 21- conduct any additional action specific to the failure, as necessary


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




Appendix 2: EQUIPEMENT QUALIFICATION STATUS REVIEW 1- SCOPE

The purpose of this contractual Equipment Qualification Status Review (EQSR) is to perform a comparison between the proposed unit and its heritage. This review is an equipment development risk analysis and it will allow to agree on a development plan (development models to be manufactured, design reviews to be hold, schedule…) Output of EQSR review conclusion are the basis for subcontractor contractual negotiations. At this stage they become a commitment from the subcontractor and any later additional identified difference regarding heritage need to be processed through change proposal

2-TERMS AND DEFINITION

Following abbreviated terms are specific to this standard

− BBM : Bread Board Model − CCN : Configuration Change Notice − CDR : Critical Design Review − EQM : Engineering Qualification Model − EM : Engineering Model − FM : Flight Model − ICD : Interface Control Drawing − IDS : Interface Data Sheet − PFM : Proto Flight Model − QM : Qualification Model

3- EQSR CONDUCTING PROCEDURE

3-1 PRELIMINARY

3-1-1DOCUMENTATION AVAILABILITY Prior to EQSR reviews, the heritage of qualification will be confirmed to higher level Customers by the Subcontractor / Supplier with the following preference : 1- Single one heritage (one definition, one model) 2- Heritage based on single definition with several models used to establish qualification

status provided that the non completion of one model does not endanger the whole qualification plan.

3- Heritage based on several models presenting minor differences of definition provided that each minor difference will be detailed and justified with qualification demonstrated for all the successive models and provided that all the successive qualifications do not endanger the initial qualification. The justification shall be checked by the Product responsible with the related Product Assurance Responsible, the experts will be consulted as necessary. After 5 consecutive modifications (or every 18 months), the Product responsible and the Product assurance responsible with all the relevant experts shall check systematically that all the successive qualification(s) do not endanger the initial qualification and shall state with all relevant experts the acceptability of the


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




qualification policy(Shock, ESD, Vibrations, electrical …) with all the justification formalised and validated.

As a minimum the qualification shall have completed all its equipment qualification tests to be quoted as heritage. In case of of heritage selected for which the qualification is not achieved,

1. to clearly identify in the EQSR Form G that the Qualification is on going on another project (with consequently the category B declared).

2. To present during a dedicated meeting (QR or Delta EQSR) the achievement of the Qualification as soon as available.

The documentation of the heritage program (CDR and acceptance data packages) will have to be used by the equipment Supplier to fill in the EQSR forms and will have to be :

1-delivered to higher level Customers for review , 2-be available in the meeting room during EQSR reviews in case of “non deliverable

documents”.

3-1-2 EQUIPMENT CATEGORY DEFINITION The Subcontractor will justify a design/development/qualification category for each item of flight equipment as described below. This categorisation needs the approval of higher level Customers. Each hardware will be assigned to one of the following "state of development" categories. Remark : the detail of Qualification philosophy and model, based on justified subcontractor proposal have to be agreed during EQSR. The definition of each category and the Typical qualification philosophy are the ones defined in ECSS-E-ST-10-02C chapter 5.2.4.2. and are reminded in the following table .

Category Description Qualification programme A Off the shelf product without modifications and

• subjected to a qualification test programme at least as severe as that imposed by the actual project specifications including environment and

• produced by the same manufacturer or supplier and using the same tools and manufacturing processes and procedures

None

B Off the shelf product without modifications. However: It has been subjected to a qualification test programme less severe or different to that imposed by the actual project specifications (including environment).

Delta qualification programme, decided on a case by case basis.

C Off ‐the‐ shelf Modification includes changes to design, parts, materials, tools, processes, procedures, supplier, or manufacturer.

Delta or full qualification programme (including testing), decided on a case by case basis depending on the impact of the modification.

D Newly designed and developed product Full qualification programme.


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




3-2 REVIEW 3-2-1 GOALS The EQSR goals are : • To confirm 1. Suppliers of equipment and its module (lower level items for which a dedicated

specification is available). 2. equipment category. 3. reference of qualification program and designs (heritage). • To identify if all of the differences / evolution’s / changes between configuration items

have to be listed, particularly in drawings and parts / materials / processes (and their procurement specification).

• To state on adequacy of proposed development plan. Completion of EQSR will be achieved after higher level Customers / Subcontractor approval of the minutes of EQSR with close out of action items. 3-2-2 AGENDA • Introduction of attendees. • Equipment description. • Facility tour in conjunction with referenced qualification. • Presentation of EQSR forms filled in by the subcontractor. • Review of qualification documentation (referenced by EQSR forms) • Session for problems and open areas. • Preparation of the EQSR close out conditions (equipment classification and associated

development plan). • Approval of the EQSR minutes. 3-2-3 EQSR DOCUMENTATION The minimum documentation to hold EQSR is • the CDR data package, • the ICD and IDS applicable to the program compliant with higher level Customers

requirements with a maturity statement in accordance to the claimed category • the qualification unit Acceptance Data Package • the filled in EQSR forms of each heritage module/sub- equipment • specification compliance matrix to justify comparison of performance requirements

program versus heritage. (In the case of proprietary unavailable documentation, heritage won’t be taken into account, therefore full development plan will be requested).

3-2-4 PARTICIPANTS AT EACH EQSR The review is conducted by the higher level Customer PA manager The review board consists of the program manager, engineering manager and PA manager of each company (higher level Customers, Subcontractor, Supplier).

Other persons will participate as required or as delegated by the review board.

3-2-5 FACILITY TOUR Access to hardware and a tour of the facilities in conjunction with the referenced qualification should be organised to ease the review . 3-2-6 MINUTES OF MEETING


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




At the end of EQSR the minutes taken by the Subcontractor, will be signed by the board members. A FORM SHEET CONCLUSION attached to the M.O.M shall show the agreement on : • QUALIFICATION HERITAGE • DEVELOPMENT MODELS TO BE MANUFACTURED • QUALIFICATION PLAN TO BE IMPLEMENTED • DESIGN REVIEWS TO BE HOLD • SUPPLIERS • EQUIPMENT CATEGORY • COMMENTS 3-3 CHANGES AFTER EQSR Any change compared to EQSR recorded data will be processed through CCN . 3-4 EQSR FORMATS The purpose of EQSR forms is to perform a comparison between the proposed unit and its heritage with detailed differences description (forms type E and F are used to detail differences).


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




ACTUAL PROGRAM NAME : HERITAGE PROGRAM NAME :

PPrroodduucctt nnaammee : SSuupppplliieerr : PPrroodduucctt ccaatteeggoorryy : PPaarrtt nnuummbbeerr ((PP//NN)) : CCoouunnttrryy :

FFOORRMM AA :: HHAARRDDWWAARREE QQUUAALLIIFFIICCAATTIIOONN MMOODDEELL PPOOLLIICCYY PPRROOPPOOSSAALL

Equipment (*) Part Number Supplier (*) Cat. (*) Heritage BBM (**) EM (**) EQM (**) QM (**) PFM (**) Remark

Modules (*) If the unit is divided into separated modules (for which a dedicated specification is provided)they will be identified here after and a specific set of forms B, C, D,E has to be completed for each module)

(*) of present program (**) development models of present program


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




HERITAGE PROGRAM NAME :


FFOORRMM BB :: CCOOMMPPAARRIISSOONN OOFF HHEERRIITTAAGGEE QQUUAALLIIFFIIEEDD DDEESSIIGGNN // PPRROOGGRRAAMM FFLLIIGGHHTT DDEESSIIGGNN SSTTAANNDDAARRDDSS

Standards Heritage Qualified Design Title /Reference/Iss/Rev

Actual Program flight design Title /Reference/Iss/Rev Difference

Equipment specification (STB)

Equipment SOW

Equipment SOA Configuration item data list (CIDL) Top assembly Drawing

Interface Data sheet (IDS)

Interface Control Drawing (ICD)

Interface Control Drawing Doc.

Declared processes list (DPL)

Declared materials list (DML)

Declared Mec. parts list (Depart List

EEE part list (EEE PL)

Manufacturing and Inspection flow chart (MIFC)

User Manual

Critical Item List (CIL)


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012






FFOORRMM BB :: CCOOMMPPAARRIISSOONN OOFF HHEERRIITTAAGGEE QQUUAALLIIFFIIEEDD DDEESSIIGGNN // PPRROOGGRRAAMM FFLLIIGGHHTT DDEESSIIGGNN SSTTAANNDDAARRDDSS

Standards Heritage Qualified Design Title /Reference/Iss/Rev

Actual Program flight design Title /Reference/Iss/Rev Difference

Qualification Status List (QSL)

Mechanical Analysis

Thermal analysis

Radiation analysis

EMC/ESD analysis

Reliability analysis

FMECA

Safety analysis

Derating analysis

Worst case Analysis

Development plan

Design Verification matrix (DVM)

Conformity Matrix

Acceptance test plan

Design Qualification data package


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012






FFOORRMM BB :: CCOOMMPPAARRIISSOONN OOFF HHEERRIITTAAGGEE QQUUAALLIIFFIIEEDD DDEESSIIGGNN // PPRROOGGRRAAMM FFLLIIGGHHTT DDEESSIIGGNN SSTTAANNDDAARRDDSS ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS (CHANGE REQUEST …)


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012






FFOORRMM CC :: BBAASSIICC QQUUAALLIIFFIICCAATTIIOONN DDEESSIIGGNN AANNDD BBUUIILLDD SSTTAANNDDAARRDDSS

List of all RFW/RFD and NCR that have been raised for each previously qualified subassembly or piece of equipment.

REFERENCE SPECIFICATION AFFECTED REFERENCE - ISSUE - REV DESCRIPTION STATUS


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012






FFOORRMM DD11 :: PPRROOGGRRAAMM VVEERRSSUUSS HHEERRIITTAAGGEE PPEERRFFOORRMMAANNCCEE CCOOMMPPAARRIISSOONN -- TTEESSTT RREESSUULLTTSS

PRESENT PROGRAM (PRE FILLED BY ASP) HERITAGE PROGRAM

Performance requirements Performance expected Comments Measured performances


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012






FFOORRMM DD22 :: PPRROOGGRRAAMM VVEERRSSUUSS HHEERRIITTAAGGEE PPEERRFFOORRMMAANNCCEE CCOOMMPPAARRIISSOONN -- AANNAALLYYSSEESS

PRESENT PROGRAM (PRE FILLED BY ASP) HERITAGE PROGRAM

Performance requirements Performance expected Comments Measured performances


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012






FFOORRMM EE :: IINNTTEERRFFAACCEESS CCOOMMPPAARRIISSOONN ((EElleeccttrriiccaall aanndd mmeecchhaanniiccaall))


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012






FFOORRMM FF :: DDEESSIIGGNN MMAANNUUFFAACCTTUURRIINNGG AANNDD TTEESSTT DDIIFFFFEERREENNCCEESS Detailed explanation of parts, materials, processes, design manufacturing test differences at modules and equipment level :


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012






FFOORRMM GG :: CCOONNCCLLUUSSIIOONN • QUALIFICATION HERITAGE :

• Name :

• Qualification status (Q : Qualified, I : Qualification In progress, TBQ : To Be Qualified) :

• In case of I or TBQ status, to precise the foreseen schedule and the open activities :

• DEVELOPMENT MODELS TO BE MANUFACTURED :

• QUALIFICATION PLAN TO BE IMPLEMENTED :

• DESIGN REVIEWS TO BE HOLD :

• SUPPLIERS :

• EQUIPMENT CATEGORY :

• COMMENTS :


REFERENCE : DATE :

MTG-TAF-SY-RS-0309 27/03/2012




END OF DOCUMENT

MTG Sub-contractors and suppliers Product Assurance...

Documents

Transcript of MTG Sub-contractors and suppliers Product Assurance...