MS Word Version Comparison
-
Upload
philip-jones -
Category
Technology
-
view
1.840 -
download
3
description
Transcript of MS Word Version Comparison
Adam Emfield
Philip Jones
Ryan McGarry
* Seven Years of Microsoft Word: Evolving Interfaces and Usability
*Changes in Word
*Microsoft Word 2007 introduced new interface paradigm (the “Ribbon”) to organize options differently*Many claim the newer version slows them down, making it
harder to find familiar menu choices that have been reorganized
* Task-based layout
*Word 2010 tweaks 2007, adds Backstage View
*Our Study
*Tested for empirical confirmation of anecdotal evidence*Data from Word 2003, 2007, and 2010 beta
*Each version tweaks method of formatting text, tracking changes/working with comments, and accessing printing options
*Methods
*Participants had ”moderate” or more experience with 2003, 2007*No experience required with 2010 beta
*Given standardized instructions
*Asked to perform specific tasks
*Formatting text, header
*Adding reader comments
*Changing printing options
*Information Gathering
*Data collected with screen capture software*Observation with minimal interaction
*Recorded verbalizations to gain insight into user perceptions*Verbal protocol analysis
*Task Analyses
*Verbal protocol analysis
*KLMs*Task x Version
*Timeline analyses*High resolution due to small task time
*Hypotheses
*We predicted that some tasks with new, logical menu locations would be faster in 2007
*e.g. Changing formatting, double-spacing text
*Other tasks with a longer workflow faster in 2003
*e.g. Adding comments
*Word 2010 beta will improve upon ‘File’ menu operations (compared to 2007), all else constant
*e.g. Print, Save
*Results
*KLM
*KLM Times
Task 1 Task 2 Task 30.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
160.00
Expected Task Duration by Version
200320072010
Tim
e (
sec)
*Timeline Analysis
*Timeline: Task 1
Time (s) 2003 2007 2010
2 Edit Header Edit Header Edit Header
35.7 34 36.7
10
20
30
Double-Space Document
Double-Space Document 11.3 Double-Space Document
40 7.7 11.3
Format Title Page in APA Format
21.7 Format Title Page in APA Format
50 24 Format Title Page in APA Format
30.7
60
Insert Page Break
70 5.7
Insert Page Break
2.7
80 Insert Page Break
5.3
84
Time (s) 2003 2007 2010
2 Turn on Track Changes Turn on Track Changes Turn on Track Changes
5.5 7 6.5
Correct Spelling Errors and Duplicate Words
Correct Spelling Errors and Duplicate Words10
Correct Spelling Errors and Duplicate Words 144.5 43.5
78.5
20
30
40
50
Accept Changes in Introduction
6.5
60 Read Comments in Methods Section
9
70 Add Comments to Methods Section
23.5
80
90 Accept Changes in Introduction
10
100 Read Comments in Methods Section
8.5
Add Comments to Methods Section
110 25
120
130
140
150
Accept Changes in Introduction
9.5
160
Read Comments in Methods Section
8.5
170
Add Comments to Methods Section
30
180
190
200
*Timeline: Task 2
*Timeline: Task 3
Time (s) 2003 2007 2010
2 Select Print Select Print Select Print
3.7 4.3 4.7
Select Desired Printer Select Desired Printer Select Desired Printer
5.3 4.3 6.3
10 Edit Advanced Options
Edit Advanced Options 48 Edit Advanced Options
46.3 39.7
20
30
40
50
Print Specific Pages
5.3
60 Print Specific Pages Print Specific Pages Turn Off Collate
4 4.3 6
Turn Off Collate (2.3) Turn Off Collate (2)
Select Print Select Print Select Print
1.7 2 10.3
70
74
*Verbal Protocol Analysis
*Issues
*Reading comprehension
*180 WPM on a monitor* Ziefle, M. (1998), Effects of display resolution on visual performance, Human Factors, 40(4),
555–568.
*Confounds
*Final Thoughts
*VPA: greater frustration with 2007 associated with greater experience ratio with 2003 (vs. 2007)
*Minimal changes between 2007, 2010 beta
*Users with 2010 experience likely to prefer 2007/2010 over 2003