Morten Aagaard HANDS Side 1/10

The Proposal its objectives

1. Who are we?2. The challenge3. The objective4. Specific HANDS values and properties5. Considerations6. Work

Morten Aagaard HANDS Side 2/10

Introductionary remarksWhile writing the proposal we consider 1. What we actually wants to do2. What FP7 wants us to do and in which way

Benefit of joining HANDS• Network• Access to new knowledge

Morten Aagaard HANDS Side 3/10

The HANDS – ConsortiumResearchAalborg University,

ELTE – Budapest, LSBU, London

TestschoolsEgebakken,

Ullerødskolen, Autism Foundation, HA School, SvedenSkolan

Software DevelopersWirtek(DK/RU),

Edvantage(DK/NO)

Morten Aagaard HANDS Side 4/10

FP7 – The objectiveObjective ICT-2007.7.2: Accessible and

Inclusive ICT d)

Targeted and exploratory ICT research on innovative communication and shared creative environments aimed at facilitating social inclusion of marginalised young people. A limited number of small scale preparatory actions should contribute to a future research agenda. Proposals addressing this area should be supported by organisations having a track-record in research on ICT and marginalised young people.

HANDS – a STREP project – Specific targeted research project

Morten Aagaard HANDS Side 5/10

A ProposalSection A – Forms____________________Section B Section 1(Typical 20 pages)

1.1 Concept and objectives 1.2 Progress beyond the state of the art 1.3 S/T methodology and associated work plan

Section 2 (Typical 7-8 pages) 2.1Management structure and procedures2.2Individual Participants2.3Consortium as a whole2.4Resources to be committed

Section 3 (10 pages) 3.1 Expected impacts listed in the work programme3.2Dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and management of intellectual property

Section 4(3 pages)Ethical issues(a form)

Appendix CV, Litteraturelist, Future Research Agenda

Morten Aagaard HANDS Side 6/10

Evaluators Scoreboard includes

1. Scientific and/or technological excellence(relevant to the topics adressed by the call)

2. Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management

3. Potential impact through the development, dissimination and use of project results

Morten Aagaard HANDS Side 7/10

HANDS values and properties

1. Persuasive Technology2. Open Source3. Usercentric design4. Ethics is considered5. Interdisciplinary work with the

involvement of the professional practioner

Morten Aagaard HANDS Side 8/10

Considerations1. Collaboration between research and

development2. The role of ethics3. My role?

Morten Aagaard HANDS Side 9/10

The Proposal its objectives Work/timeline

While writing/correcting: labels, terms and more may change!While reading: how can you contribe?

Published Deadline

WP description. WP leaders

Already 1. Version September 24th(leader)Final October 3th

Section 1.1+1.2. All

AlreadyJesper Thestrup reviews September 19th

ImpactRisk-Threat matrixFuture Research AgendaLitteraturelist

All.

Thursday, September 20th

Jesper Thestrup reviews September 19th

September 27th

The Acronym - the inspired ones

Already October 1th