MONTHLY CLEANUP STATUS REPORT - NO. 11 FOR THE PERIOD … · CLEANUP STATUS REPORT NO. 11 –...

$: MONTHLY CLEANUP STATUS REPORT - NO. 11 FOR THE PERIOD … · CLEANUP STATUS REPORT NO. 11 – AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2006 VERSION 1.0 345406\T10\FAP_CSR_11_2006-09.DOC 4 SEPTEMBER 2006$
345406\T10\FAP_CSR_11_2006-09.DOC 1 SEPTEMBER 2006

T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M

Monthly Cleanup Status Report – No. 11 Period of August 15, 2006 to September 15, 2006 Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site PREPARED FOR: Bart Cañellas/EPA

Sabino Rivera/NMED Eileen Shannon/CoA

PREPARED BY: CH2M HILL COPY TO: William LeFevre/CH2M HILL, Albuquerque

Jeff Gamlin/CH2M HILL, Albuquerque Kevin Bral/CH2M HILL, Denver Mike Brewer/CH2M HILL, Albuquerque John Knott/CH2M HILL, Dallas Amy Halloran/CH2M HILL, Albuquerque Peter van Noort/CH2M HILL, Dallas-Fort Worth

PREPARED UNDER: EPA Region 6 Remedial Action Contract No. EP-W-06-021 Work Assignment No. 0003-RALR-06DD

DCN 0003-02005 DATE: September 22, 2006

1.0 Introduction This monthly cleanup status report (CSR) summarizes operation and maintenance (O&M) activities

and monitoring data for the pump and treat (P&T) system operated as part of the selected remedy for

the Fruit Avenue Plume (FAP) Superfund Site (CERCLIS No. NMD986668911) located in

Albuquerque, New Mexico. This report describes O&M activities performed on the system from

August 15, 2006 through September 15, 2006.

The FAP Superfund Site (Site) is identified on the National Priorities List (NPL) as a chlorinated

solvent ground water plume located in the downtown area of Albuquerque, New Mexico. The

primary contaminant of concern (COC) in the ground water at the Site is trichloroethene (TCE) with

lesser amounts of tetrachloroethene (PCE), cis-1, 2-dichloroethene (DCE), and trans-1, 2-DCE. A

treatment system was constructed between August 2004 and September 2005. Routine operations of

the system started on November 18, 2005. A summary of startup operations may be found in CSR

No. 1 (CH2M HILL, 2006a). The treatment system consists of one ground water extraction well

(D2E-P1), two injection wells (D2E-I3 and I2/D1E-I1) that contain a total of three screened intervals

FRUIT AVENUE PLUME SUPERFUND SITE CLEANUP STATUS REPORT NO. 11 – AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2006

VERSION 1.0


for re-injection of treated water into the aquifer (single injection well [D2 aquifer zone], dual

injection well upper tube [I2 aquifer zone], and dual injection well lower tube [D1 aquifer zone]), and

an air stripper treatment system. The treatment system location is shown in Figure 1; the layout of

the system is provided in Figure 2.

The FAP Superfund Site Record of Decision (EPA, 2001) established a remediation action objective

(RAO) for operation of the treatment system that prevents human ingestion of, inhalation of, or

dermal contact with ground water that contains concentrations of PCE above 5 micrograms per liter

(µg/L), TCE above 5 µg/L, DCE above 70 µg/L, and trans-1,2-DCE above 100 µg/L (these are the

Maximum Contaminant Level Goals [MCLGs] set by the Clean Water Act (or are MCLs where

MCLGs are set at zero)).

To meet this RAO and Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs), the

treatment system has the following operational goals:

• COCs at concentrations less than MCLs at the ASTP effluent

• Air emissions below state and federal threshold levels

• Maintain >80% run time

• Maintain contaminant plume capture

2.0 Operations Summary This section summarizes the field activities and presents the operational data that were collected from

the treatment system during the reporting period. Operational highlights for this reporting period are

presented in Table 1 and a summary of O&M activities is presented in Table 2. The performance of

the treatment system was monitored by onsite staff, and by remote monitoring of the SCADA system.

A list of ASTP operational parameters monitored is included in Table 3. Onsite observations of non-

SCADA operational parameters were recorded on inspection data log forms. Data from the

inspection data log forms for system monitoring and operational activities through this reporting

period are reported in Table 4. Field notes documenting field activities are included in

Attachment A.

2.1 System Downtime The goal of exceeding 80% run time was achieved during this reporting period. The treatment plant

was operational 740 hours of a possible 747 hours, or 99.1% of the reporting period. The ASTP


VERSION 1.0


runtime calculation and history are presented in Table 5. Non-routine down time is caused by events

that are beyond CH2M HILL’s and EPA’s control, and is not included in the run-time calculations

used to establish the percent run time for the reporting period. Routine downtime is caused directly

by CH2M HILL during normal operations and maintenance events, and is included in the run-time

calculations.

2.1.1 Routine Downtime Routine downtime during this reporting period occurred while changing the bag filters concurrently

with injection well back flushing and only resulted in minimal impact to the overall run time. Details

of these events are included below in Section 2.4.1. The following list summarizes the routine

system shutdown occurrences and durations during this period.

• The system was shut down at 17:30 on August 26, 2006 for a routine bag filter change and

restarted at 18:00. Downtime attributed to this reporting period: 0.5 hours.

• The system was shut down at 7:50 on September 7, 2006 for back flushing and a routine bag filter

change and restarted at 14:07. Downtime attributed to this reporting period: 6.28 hours.

2.1.2 Non-Routine Downtime Non-routine downtime is occasionally caused by low pH in the equalization tank, inspections and

testing, or a reinjection pump fail to start alarm. Non-routine downtime did not occur during this

reporting period.

2.2 Operational Data and Process Monitoring Data The ASTP SCADA system continuously monitors the operational data listed in Table 3. Non-

SCADA parameters are monitored approximately once per week. Figure 2 illustrates the locations of

the water and exhaust sampling ports, SCADA monitoring instruments, and the location on non-

SCADA instruments. The data recorded by the SCADA system is saved on a hard drive associated

with the computer system. The hard drive is backed up monthly. The non-SCADA data recorded by

the operator on the inspection data log forms are included in Attachment B. Field notes

documenting field activities are included in Attachment A.

2.2.1 Plant Influent and Effluent, and Efficiency of Aboveground Treatment Components A review of the trended SCADA data indicates that the ASTP operated at a total injection rate from

14 gpm to 64 gpm with an average of 61 gpm during this reporting period. The total injection rate

has currently been reduced to approximately 45 gpm because injection to the dual injection well has

been suspended while the well is being redeveloped.


VERSION 1.0


The cumulative and monthly volumes of ground water extracted and injected by the ASTP are

presented in Table 6 and Figure 3. Through the end of this reporting period, a cumulative total of

approximately 35,900,000 gallons of water have been pumped from the extraction well and treated by

the air stripper, approximately 34,400,000 gallons of treated water have been re-injected via the

injection well system, and approximately 939,000 gallons of treated water have been discharged to

the sanitary sewer. During this reporting period, approximately 2,310,000 gallons of water have been

pumped from the extraction well, treated by the air striper, and re-injected via the injection well

system and no water has been discharged to the sanitary sewer. The discrepancy between the influent

and effluent volumes is discussed below in Section 2.3.

Current and historical COC concentrations in the ASTP influent (sample port SP-1) and effluent

(sample port SP-5) are summarized in Table 7. Analytical results from sampling during this

reporting period are contained in Attachment C. Samples for this reporting period were collected on

August 16, 2006. The following conclusions pertain to the analytical data from this reporting period:

• The influent sample for this reporting period contained TCE (13.6 μg/L), cis-1, 2-DCE

(5.6 μg/L), and trans-1, 2-DCE (1.9 μg/L).

• The effluent sample for this reporting period contained no detectable COCs. The observed

concentrations of COCs in the effluent sample well are below the MCLs and prove that the plant

meets the operational goal for effluent contaminant concentrations.

• A comparison of influent and effluent COC concentrations suggests that the ASTP removes

greater than 90-percent of analyzed COCs from the treated water.

The range of contaminant concentrations detected in the influent samples are within the range of

variability expected from environmental samples and the analytical method at this low concentration.

As a result, no substantial trend is observed in the concentrations measured since startup. As

illustrated in Figure 4, the lack of a statistically significant trend precludes the estimation of a date

upon which MCLs will be achieved in the ASTP influent.

The mass removal of COCs by the treatment system during this reporting period was calculated based

on the total volume of ground water pumped from the extraction well during the reporting period and

the difference between the influent and treated (effluent) water concentrations as measured during the

sampling event. A concentration of one-half the detection limit (0.25 μg/L during this reporting

period) was used if a particular COC was not detected in the treated water sample. Calculations of

the contaminant mass removed by the system are illustrated in Attachment D. The cumulative and


VERSION 1.0


monthly mass of COCs removed from ground water since the treatment system commenced

operations are presented in Table 8 and illustrated in Figure 5. Approximately 2.46 kilograms (kg)

of VOCs (consisting of TCE, cis-1, 2-DCE, and trans-1, 2-DCE) are estimated to have been removed

from the ground water aquifer since the treatment system began operation. PCE has not been

detected in the influent water samples.

All previously collected air emissions samples have shown that the maximum concentrations detected

from the treatment system have been below applicable regulatory standards. Since the influent

concentrations of VOCs in ground water have not varied appreciably since startup, the concentrations

observed in the air emissions are not expected to have changed. Therefore, an air emissions sample

was not collected during this reporting period.

2.2.2 Extraction Well Data A review of the trended SCADA data indicates that the pumping rate for the extraction well (D2E-P1)

ranged from 98 to 111 gpm throughout this reporting period. The extraction well pump is cycled

on/off to maintain flow balance with the re-injection system. Flow at the extraction well is manually

controlled through the SCADA system to maintain a fixed flow rate so that the frequency of on/off

cycles is minimized. A comparison of the extraction well and injection pump timers shows that the

extraction pump operated approximately 48% of the time during this period.

The specific capacity of the extraction well was determined from data collected several times during

the reporting period. The average specific capacity calculated for the extraction well during this

reporting period is approximately 3.9 gpm/ft. The data used to determine the specific capacity of the

extraction well are displayed in Table 9. The specific capacity observed this period is within the

historic range of 3.4 to 3.9 gpm/ft and is not expected to change significantly during long-term

operation.

It is assumed that the conclusions of the capture zone evaluation are still applicable because the

extraction well continues to operate at approximately the same flow rate and operational runtime as

was included in the capture zone evaluation in the March 2006 CSR (CH2M HILL, 2006b).

• Little or no capture is occurring in the I2 zone. The extraction well is screened across the D2

zone only and does not appear to be affecting the I2 zone.

• In the D1 zone, capture of contaminants identified by the monitor well SFMW-22 appears

successful. Contaminants downstream and south of the pumping well are not being captured.


VERSION 1.0


• In the D2 zone, capture of contaminants identified by the monitor well SFMW-23 appears

successful. Contaminants downstream and south of the pumping well are not being captured.

Contaminants upstream of the pumping well will likely not be captured as they would tend to

move around the injection boundary.

In summary, the vertical and horizontal extent of the capture zone is as was expected when the

location of the extraction well was selected (CH2M HILL, 2004).

2.2.3 Injection Well Data The flow of treated water to the injection wells is manually controlled through the SCADA system to

maintain a fixed flow rate at each injection well. The FCVs are programmed to stop injection when

the water in the well reaches a predetermined level. The injection FCVs are currently programmed to

maintain water levels below 20 feet below ground surface and achieve the following approximate

flows:

• 45 gpm to the single injection well (D2E-I3).

• 0 gpm to the upper screen of the dual injection well (I2/D1E-I1) due to problems with the

water level sensor (LX 3-13-2) and during reconfiguration of the well as discussed in

Section 2.3 and Section 2.4.

• 0 gpm to the lower screen of the dual injection well (I2/D1E-I1) due to problems with the

flow control valve as discussed in the July 2006 CSR #9 and during reconfiguration of the

well as discussed in and Section 2.4.

The specific capacity of the single injection well was calculated from data collected several times

during the reporting period and is summarized in Table 9. As expected, the specific capacity of the

single injection well decreased during normal operations of the treatment system this period. Routine

back flushing of the injection wells (approximately every 2 weeks) has been effective at reclaiming

some of the injection capacity. As expected, however, redevelopment will soon be needed to

maintain the single injection well flow rates. Reconfiguration activities have started at the dual

injection well (Section 2.4).

2.3 Problems Encountered With P&T Component Operation Over the past month, the water level sensor for the shallow injection well (LX 3-13-2) has produced

highly variable level data that could not have been caused by hydrologic or ASTP operation

processes. On August 23, 2006, the water level in the shallow well was measured using an electronic


VERSION 1.0


water level indicator. The measured depth to water was found to be stable (unlike the readings from

the sensor) and the water level was approximately 17 feet higher than the sensor indicated.

The data produced by the sensor is critical to safe operation of the system. The SCADA system stops

flow to a well when the water level reaches a high-level set point, which is established to prevent

damage to foundations or having injected water emerge on the ground surface. Injection to the

shallow zone of the dual injection well was thus stopped until the sensor can be repaired, replaced, or

a workaround is implemented as part of the dual well reconfiguration.

On three occasions over the past several months, leaks have been discovered in the carbon steel

process piping and have been repaired. Trouble shooting, and process and infrastructure design

modification efforts continue in response to these leaks.

As discussed in the August 2006 CSR #10, it is clear that the influent and effluent water volumes

displayed by the HMI often do not agree. The cumulative discrepancy since plant start up is about

530,000 gallons (about 1.5 percent of the 36 million gallon total), which is within the operating

parameters of the meters. Although there was a large discrepancy last month, there was no volume

discrepancy over this reporting period. The discrepancy is caused by the SCADA system’s method of

recording and displaying the totalizer data. A modification to correct this error has been added to the

scope of work for the SCADA contractor, and corrected data tables are being prepared for inclusion

in the next CSR.

2.4 System Modifications, Maintenance, and Testing The purpose of this section is to summarize routine and non-routine maintenance and system

modifications performed during this reporting period and to identify routine maintenance activities

scheduled for the next reporting period.

2.4.1 Routine Maintenance As part of the routine maintenance procedures for the treatment system, each injection well is

backflushed. To ensure adequate staffing and equipment availability, routine backflushing is

conducted by a subcontractor every two weeks. A detailed description of backflushing operations is

included in the March 2006 CSR No. 5. Injection to a well is suspended while it is being backflushed

and restarted as soon as work is complete. During this reporting period, the lower injection well was

not backflushed because it had not been used for injection. The upper injection well was backflushed

on August 24, 2006, and the single injection well was backflushed both on August 24, 2006, and

September 7, 2006. Additional backflushing is scheduled for the next reporting period.


VERSION 1.0


Additional routine maintenance performed during this reporting period included changing the bag

filters. Changing the bag filters requires that the ASTP be shut down long enough to drain the filter

canisters. The influent filter bags (BF No.1) were changed on August 26, 2006, and September 7,

2006. The effluent filter bags (BF No.2) did not need to be changed during this reporting period. The

influent filter elements were an orange-brown color as would be expected if there were a buildup of

iron-oxyhydroxide precipitate.

The air stripper view windows have remained generally clear and pressure in the air stripper has

remained within acceptable limits. Some orange buildup is visible on the upper view window but

there is no buildup or deposits on the inside of the upper tray. Cleaning of the air stripper trays was

therefore not required during this reporting period.

2.4.2 System Modifications and Non-Routine Maintenance On Wednesday September 13, 2006, the HVAC subcontractor visited the ASTP to take measurements

for the installation of the new transfer pump. This pump is being replaced at this time because

performance parameters, such as the pressure and flow produced by the pump, are degrading and

suggest that a catastrophic failure may be imminent. The new piping runs have been prefabricated

and will be installed with the pump on Monday, September 18, 1006.

On Thursday September 14, the well-maintenance subcontractor mobilized to the site to begin the

redevelopment and reconfiguration of the dual injection well. All wellhead equipment was removed

from the well and some of the down-hole piping was removed on September 14. The remainder of

the down-hole piping was removed the following day. A pre-redevelopment down-hole video

inspection of the well is scheduled for Monday, September 18. Redevelopment is scheduled to begin

September 25, 2006, with post-redevelopment video logging, well testing, and reconstruction

following.

2.4.3 Corrosion and Process Chemistry Testing In response to the recurring pipe leaks and FCV failure, trouble shooting, and process and

infrastructure design modification efforts continue. A field-sampling plan has been completed to

direct water-quality and bacteriological sampling, which will begin the week of September 18, 2006.

A coupon test was started on July 18, 2006 to evaluate the corrosion rates of the materials used in the

construction of the wells and plumbing and results will be presented in a design report later.


VERSION 1.0


3.0 Conclusions The ASTP was fully functional during this reporting period. Based on the monitoring and

observations made during this reporting period, the following conclusions were developed:

• An estimated 0.18 kg of total VOCs (consisting of TCE, cis-1, 2-DCE, and trans-1, 2-DCE) were

removed from the D2 zone of the ground water aquifer during this reporting period.

• The treatment system was in operation for about 99 percent of the reporting period (August 15 to

September 15, 2006).

• Approximately 2.3 million gallons of water were pumped from the D2 aquifer and treated. All of

this water was re-injected via the injection wells with COC concentrations below the MCLs.

• No water was discharged to the sanitary sewer.

• There is a discrepancy in the totalizer volumes. The cause is being remedied and data tables will

be corrected in the next CSR.

• Previously measured air emissions were below state and federal threshold levels. As the air

emissions depend directly upon the COC concentrations in the influent ground water, and these

concentrations have not changed, it is assumed that the system still meets the goal of keeping air

emissions below state and federal levels.

• Infrastructure and process design modifications are being developed in response to corrosion

induced leaks.

• Redevelopment and reconfiguration has begun on the injection wells due to high corrosion rates.

• Installation of a replacement transfer pump has begun to repair corrosion damage.

4.0 Recommendations/Upcoming Activities Influent and effluent water sampling, injection well back flushing, and acid deliveries will continue

during the September-October operation period.

Redevelopment and reconfiguration of the injection wells and installation of the replacement transfer

pump will be completed during the next reporting period.


VERSION 1.0


A long-term plan is being developed in response to the decreased performance of the reinjection

pump and the pipe leaks observed during this reporting period. Testing materials have been installed

to evaluate corrosion rates and will be analyzed over the next few weeks.

5.0 References CH2M HILL, 2004 Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site Remedial Action: Interim System

Evaluation. February 17 2004[DCN 04-5995]

CH2M HILL, 2006a. Cleanup Status Report No. 1 – Startup Version 1.0. Fruit Avenue Plume

Superfund Site. Albuquerque, New Mexico. January 2006.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2001. Record of Decision. Fruit Avenue Plume Site.

Albuquerque, New Mexico (CERCLIS # NMD986668911). September 2001.

Tables


VERSION 1.0

345406\T10\FAP_CSR_11_2006-09.DOC SEPTEMBER 2006

(This page intentionally left blank.)

Table 1

ASTP Operational Highlights (August 15 to September 15, 2006)

Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico

Reporting Period Start Date 8/15/06 12:00 PM

Reporting Period End Date 9/15/06 2:45 PM

ASTP operation time [hrs] 740

Total volume [gal] of gw pumped during the reporting period 2.31E+06

Total volume [gal] of gw injected during the reporting period 2.31E+06

Total mass [kg] of TCE and other VOCs removed

during the reporting period 0.18

Total mass [lbs] of TCE and other VOCs removed

during the reporting period 0.40

Percent operational during the reporting period 99%

345406\T10\FAP_CSR_11_Tables_2006-09.xls PAGE 1 OF 1 SEPTEMBER 2006


Date Activity

August 15, 2006 Reporting period begins at 10:40

August 19, 2006 Dual injection well vault floods from rain the previous night. Sump pump used to remove storm water.

Other vaults not flooded.

FIT 3-13-3 reads about 4 gpm past blind flange. FIT is powered down to prevent data errors and

possibly prevent electrical problems during flooding.

LX 3-13-2 produces unexpected and unexplainable fluctuations

August 23, 2006 Water level in Upper zone checked against LX 3-13-2. Water level is about 10 feet bgs, LX 3-13-2

says about 27 feet bgs. Injection to Upper Zone stopped until LX 3-13-2 is repaired or replaced.

Sulfuric acid delivery.

August 24, 2006 Routine back flushing of single and upper injection wells. Lower zone not used and so not back

flushed.

Injection to Single from 08:00 to 10:43 while Upper is back flushed.

Injection to Upper from 10:43 to 15:52 while Single is back flushed.

August 25, 2006 Increase acid dose from 400/63 to 410/63

August 26, 2006 Tested influent pressure gauge. Reads 20 PSI with no water in the pipe (drained past red check

valve and foot valve in pump).

ASTP shut down from 17:30 to 18:00 for influent filter bag change.

After filter bag change, zero pressure still reads 20 PSI but operation is 23 PSI.

August 27, 2006 LTM Monitoring begins. Water levels collected today.

August 28, 2006 Prebid meeting for Dual Injection Well redevelopment and reconfiguration.

Coupons pulled at 11:30: A53 - #03 and #04; 304 SS - #A0688 and #A0689.

Decrease acid dose to 405/63.

Influent and effluent samples tested for Fe+2, Fe(Total), DO, Sulfide using field kits.

LTM Groundwater samples collected.

August 29, 2006 LTM Groundwater samples collected.

September 1, 2006 Decrease acid dose to 402/63

September 7, 2006 Routine back flushing of single injection well.

Lower and Upper zones not used and so not back flushed.

ASTP shut down from 07:50 to 14:07 while Single is back flushed.

Influent bag filters changed.

September 8, 2006 Decrease acid dose to 400/63

September 13, 2006 Measure pipe fittings for new transfer pump w/Total Services

September 14, 2006 Begin Dual injection well rehab. Well head dismantled and 2-inch piping removed from well.

September 15, 2006 Dual Injection well rehab continues: remaining pipe pulled from well, is set aside for possible reuse.

August 15, 2006 Reporting period ends at 14:45.

Notes:

bgs below ground surface

VOC volatile organic compound

gal gallon

ft feet

Acid Dose 403/63 Acid metering pump is set to start up at 63% pump speed went well pump starts then change to 403 mg/L

as pumping rate stabilizes.

µm micrometer

mL milliliter

psi pounds per square inch

FCV flow control valve

Table 2

ASTP O&M Activities (August 15 to September 15, 2006)


ASTP Air Stripper Treatment Plant


Table 3

List of ASTP Operational Parameters Monitored



Trended Parameters - SCADA parameters

Flow rates at each extraction and injection well head and the total injection flow (5 locations)

Water levels in each extraction and injection well and the equalization tank (5 locations)

Pressure at each injection well head and the reinjection pump (4 locations)

Valve position for FCVs at each extraction and injection well (4 valves)

Blower air discharge rate (SCFM)

Blower discharge pressure (inches of water)

Blower airflow rate (scfm)

pH in the equalization tank

Acid pump speed (% of maximum rate)

Acid level in the acid storage tank

Acid dosage factor set point

Non-Trended Parameters - SCADA parameters

Extraction well hours of operation (hours)

Injection pump hours of operation (hours)

Air stripper blower hours of operation (hours)

Acid pump hours of operation (hours)

Transfer pump hours of operation (hours)

Extraction well flow totalizer (gallons)

Treated water injection total volume injected (gallons)

Treated water injection gallons injected to single screen (gallons)

Treated water injection gallons injected to upper screen (gallons)

Treated water injection gallons injected to lower screen (gallons)

Non-Trended / Non-SCADA parameters

Influent water pressure (psi)

Post pre-treatment bag-filter water pressure (psi)

Post transfer pump water pressure (psi)

Post post-treatment bag filter water pressure (psi)

Sanitary sewer flow rate and totalizer (gallons)

Retreatment loop flow rate and totalizer (gallons)

Potable water totalizer (gallons)


Table 4

ASTP Operational Data (August 15 to September 15, 2006)



FAP ASTP Inspection Data Log Form

8/15/06 12:00 9/7/06 8:00 9/11/06 13:16 9/13/06 13:45 9/15/06 14:45

COMPUTER CONTROL SCREEN READINGS

Overview Screen

Treated Water (Injection Well) Flow FIT-3121 GPM 59.4 46.8 46.3 45.8 45.3 - - -

Equalization Tank Level PIT-391 FEET 3..3 1.69 2.27 2.56 1.92 - - -

Acid Tank Level LIT331 FEET 2.45 4.43 4.2 4.09 3.98 - - -

Reinjection Pump Pressure PIT-3101 PSI 49.3 51.1 51.6 51.7 51.5 - - -

Pumping Well Level LX-311 FEET 100.4 102.3 101.5 101.4 103.9 - - -

Pumping Well Discharge Flow FIT-311 GPM 106.6 108.0 107.1 106.1 107 - - -

Single Injection Well Pressure PIT-3131 PSI 49.7 51.4 50.4 49.8 48.5 - - -

Single Injection Well Level LX-3131 FEET 162.3 149.5 157.8 158.2 157.6 - - -

Single Injection Well Flow FIT-3131 GPM 45.9 46.9 46.2 46.0 44.9 - - -

Dual Injection Well Upper Tube Pressure PIT-3132 PSI 50.6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dual Injection Well Upper Tube Level LX-3132 FEET 84.7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dual Injection Well Upper Tube Flow FIT-3132 GPM 13.8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dual Injection Well Lower Tube Pressure PIT-3133 PSI 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dual Injection Well Lower Tube Level LX-3133 FEET 81.4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dual Injection Well Lower Tube Flow FIT-3133 GPM 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Acid Dosage Factor Set point N/A mg/L 400/63 402/63 400/63 400/63 400/63 - - -

Equipment Run Times Screen

Acid Feed Pump P-331 HRS 5,513.1 5,791.0 5,832.0 5,852.9 5,873.8 - - -

Air Stripper Blower P-361 HRS 7,185.3 7,733.2 7,828.0 7,876.4 7,925.4 - - -

Transfer Pump P-381 HRS 5,898.0 6,224.1 6,273.9 6,299.2 6,324.6 - - -

Reinjection Pump P-3101 HRS 7,101.9 7,649.8 7,744.6 7,793.1 7,842.0 - - -

Pumping Well Pump P-311 HRS 5,717.0 5,993.3 6,034.1 6,054.9 6,075.7 - - -

Totalizers Screen

Treated Water (Injection Well) Flow FIT-3121 GAL 32,086,426 33,764,147 34,183,578 34,183,578 34,393,293 - - -

Pumping Well Discharge Flow FIT-311 GAL 33,554,432 35,441,869 35,651,584 35,861,299 35,861,299 - - -

Single Injection Well Discharge Flow FIT-3131 GAL 19,293,798 20,866,662 21,076,378 21,286,093 21,390,950 - - -

Dual Injection Well Upper Tube Flow FIT-3132 GAL 3,486,515 3,722,445 3,722,445 3,722,445 3,722,445 - - -

Dual Injection Well Lower Tube Flow FIT-3133 GAL 9,646,899 9,646,899 9,646,899 9,646,899 9,646,899 - - -

LOCAL EQUIPMENT READINGS

Sanitary Sewer Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A GAL 939,098 - - - - - - - - - 939,098 - - -

Water Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A Ft^3 535.09 - - - - - - - - - 543.75 - - -

Electric Utility Meter - Outside ASTP N/A kWh 125,858 - - - - - - - - - 135,839 - - -

Electric Utility Meter - D2EI3/D2EP1 N/A kWh - - - - - - - - - - - - 6,410 - - -

Recirculation Totalizer Inside ASTP N/A GAL 1,009,832 1,009,832 1,009,832 1,009,832 1,009,832 - - -

Pressure Gauge at ASTP Influent N/A PSI 24.0 23.5 24.0 24.5 25.3 - - -

Pressure Gauge after Influent Bag Filter N/A PSI 3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 - - -

Air Stripper Blower Airflow Rate N/A x100 CFM 9 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.0 - - -

Air Stripper Sump Pressure N/A in-H2O 15 16 15 15 15 - - -

Pressure Gauge after Transfer Pump N/A PSI 18 13 14 14 14 - - -

Pressure Gauge after Treated Water Bag Filter N/A PSI 48 - - - 49.8 79.0 48.0 - - -

ACID Feed Pump Reading N/A Pulses 137 138 136 135 135 - - -

ACID Feed Pump Reading N/A Stroke 84% 83% 84% 84% 83% - - -

Notes:

ASTP Air Stripper Treatment Plant

bgs below ground surface

ft feet

hrs hours

mg/L milligrams per liter

kWh kilowatt hour

gal gallon

µm micrometer

mL milliliter

psi pounds per square inch

Acid Dosage Factor Setpoint 403/63 (e.g.) Acid metering pump is set to start

up at 63% pump speed went well pump starts then change to 403 mg/L as

pumping rate stabilizes.

Dual injection well pressure, level, and flow not recorded when the dual

injection well was not being used.

Equipment

ID

Date & TimeDate & TimeUnits

345406\T10\FAP_CSR_11_Tables_2006-09.xls] PAGE 1 OF 1 SEPTEMBER 2006

Table 5ASTP Run Time Calculation and History (August 15 to September 15, 2006)Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund SiteAlbuquerque, New Mexico

Event Date/Times Event Date/Times Cause Reporting Date % OperationalStart 8/15/06 12:00 ASTP stop 09/15/2006 99%Stop 9/15/06 14:45 restart 08/15/2006 100%Reporting Period [days] 31.1 downtime [hrs] 0.00 07/18/2006 73%Reporting Period [hrs] 746.75 06/15/2006 97%Non-Routine Downtime [hrs] 0.00 ASTP stop 05/15/2006 99%Operational Period [hrs] 746.75 restart 04/17/2006 98%

downtime [hrs] 0.00 03/15/2006 85%Routine Downtime 6.78 02/15/2006 97%

01/16/2006 75%12/15/2005 72%

Event Date/Times CausePercent Operational 99.1% ASTP stop 08/26/2006 17:30 Routine: Bag filter change

restart 08/26/2006 18:00downtime [hrs] 0.50

ASTP stop 09/07/2006 7:50restart 09/07/2006 14:07downtime [hrs] 6.28

Routine: Back flushing and bag filter change

Total Routine Downtime6.78 hrs

Total Non-Routine Downtime

0.00 hrs

Run Time This Reporting Period

739.97 Routine Downtime

Reporting Period Non-Routine Downtime Runtime History

No non-routine shutdowns


Table 6

Volume of Water Extracted and Injected



Cumulative

Extraction

Cumulative

Discharge

Monthly

Extraction

Monthly

Discharge

Extraction Well

Flow

(gal)

Treated Water

Flow

(gal)

Single Injection

Well Flow

(gal)

Dual Injection

Well Upper Flow

(gal)

Dual Injection

Well Lower Flow

(gal)

Sanitary Sewer

Flow

(gal)

Extraction

Well Flow

(gal)

Treated Water

Flow

(gal)

Single Injection

Well Flow

(gal)

Dual Injection

Well Upper

Flow

(gal)

Dual Injection

Well Lower Flow

(gal)

Sanitary

Sewer Flow

(gal)

01/04/2005 - - - - - -

02/01/2005 172,001 73,539 30,575 13,169 14,762 113,495 172,001 73,539 30,575 13,169 14,762 113,495

03/01/2005 871,629 779,878 484,966 75,776 204,800 113,495 699,628 706,339 454,391 62,607 190,038 -

04/01/2005 1,127,219 891,290 534,118 91,341 252,314 256,910 255,590 111,412 49,152 15,565 47,514 143,415

05/01/2005 1,127,219 891,290 534,118 91,341 252,314 256,910 - - - - - -

06/01/2005 1,127,219 891,290 534,118 91,341 252,314 256,910 - - - - - -

07/01/2005 1,127,219 891,290 534,118 91,341 252,314 256,910 - - - - - -

08/01/2005 1,127,219 891,290 534,118 91,341 252,314 256,910 - - - - - -

09/15/2005 1,566,310 897,843 534,118 91,341 252,314 697,540 439,091 6,553 - - - 440,630

10/16/2005 2,267,546 1,343,488 796,262 134,349 398,131 954,110 701,236 445,645 262,144 43,008 145,817 256,570

11/18/2005 6,186,598 5,190,451 2,726,298 543,949 1,939,866 1,008,159 3,919,052 3,846,963 1,930,036 409,600 1,541,735 54,049

12/15/2005 8,860,467 7,916,749 4,089,446 792,986 3,080,192 937,206 2,673,869 2,726,298 1,363,148 249,037 1,140,326 (70,953)

01/16/2006 12,215,910 11,272,192 5,898,240 1,061,683 4,377,805 937,206 3,355,443 3,355,443 1,808,794 268,697 1,297,613 -

02/15/2006 15,414,067 14,470,349 7,916,749 1,323,827 5,347,738 937,206 3,198,157 3,198,157 2,018,509 262,144 969,933 -

03/15/2006 18,140,365 17,196,646 9,594,470 1,553,203 6,134,170 938,392 2,726,298 2,726,297 1,677,721 229,376 786,432 1,186

04/17/2006 22,124,954 21,286,093 12,006,195 1,939,866 7,392,461 938,392 3,984,589 4,089,447 2,411,725 386,663 1,258,291 -

05/15/2006 25,375,539 24,641,536 13,841,203 2,241,331 8,545,894 938,392 3,250,585 3,355,443 1,835,008 301,465 1,153,433 -

06/15/2006 28,940,698 28,101,837 15,833,498 2,582,118 9,646,899 938,392 3,565,159 3,460,301 1,992,295 340,787 1,101,005 -

07/18/2006 31,037,850 29,989,274 17,406,362 3,001,549 9,646,899 938,392 2,097,152 1,887,437 1,572,864 419,431 - -

08/15/2006 33,554,432 32,086,426 19,293,798 3,486,515 9,646,899 939,098 2,516,582 2,097,152 1,887,436 484,966 - 706

09/15/2006 35,861,299 34,393,293 21,390,950 3,722,445 9,646,899 939,098 2,306,867 2,306,867 2,097,152 235,930 - -

Cumulative Injection Monthly Injection

Note: The sanitary sewer discharge was redetermined on 12/15/05 based on the sewer meter. Previous values were from the recirculation meter. The difference, 71,000 gallons was pumped from the EQ

tank, through the recirculation meter, through the air stripper and back into the EQ tank during the final startup period.

Period End

Date


Table 7

Summary Analytical Results From Influent and Effluent Water Sampling



Date

cis-1,2-

Dichloro-

ethene Q

trans-1,2-

Dichloro-

ethene Q

Trichloro-

ethene Q

January 2005

Q105ASTPINFLUENT1a

N Influent 1/5/05 5.7 2.5 13

Q105ASTPEFFLUENT1b

N Effluent 1/5/05 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

Q105ASTPINFLUENT2a

N Influent 1/5/05 5.3 2.4 12

Q105ASTPEFFLUENT2b

N Effluent 1/5/05 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

Q105ASTPINFLUENT3a

N Influent 1/5/05 4.9 2.3 13

Q105ASTPEFFLUENT3b

N Effluent 1/5/05 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

Q105ASTPINFLUENT4a

N Influent 1/5/05 5.4 2.4 12

Q105ASTPEFFLUENT4b

N Effluent 1/5/05 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

Q105ASTPEFFLUENT5b

N Effluent 1/5/05 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

February 2005

N Influent 2/22/05 5.6 2.4 14

N Effluent 2/22/05 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

March 2005

N Influent 3/17/05 6 2.4 15

N Effluent 3/17/05 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

October 2005

FAP Infl 101905a

N Influent 10/19/05 5.7 2.1 12

FAP Treated 101905c

N Effluent 10/19/05 0.7 J 1.0 U 1.0 U

FAP Infl 102105a

N Influent 10/21/05 5.3 2.2 12

FAP Treated 102105c

N Effluent 10/21/05 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

FAP Infl 102505a

N Influent 10/25/05 6.6 2.7 14

FAP DUP 102505a

QA/QC Influent 10/25/05 6.4 2.7 14

FAP Treated 102505c

N Effluent 10/25/05 0.8 J 1.0 U 1.0 U

November 2005

FAP SP-1 051130a N Influent 11/30/05 5 1.4 11

FAP SP-5 051130c N Effluent 11/30/05 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U

January 2006

FAP SP-1 060109a N Influent 1/9/06 6.0 2.5 13

FAP SP-2 060109d N Pretreated 1/9/06 6.1 2.4 13

February 2006



March 2006



April 2006



May 2006

Samples not collected for the May 2006 report

June 2006

FAP SP-1 060524 N Influent 5/24/06 4.7 1.9 12.8

FAP SP-5 060524 N Effluent 5/24/06 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U

July 2006

Samples not collected in time for the July 2006 report

August 2006

FAP SP-1 0600719 N Influent 7/19/06 5.6 2.1 13.4


September 2006

FAP SP-1 0600816 N Influent 8/16/06 5.6 1.9 13.6


Notes: Data Qualifier (Q):

a Sample taken from sample port at ASTP influent line (SP1) U - the analyte was not detected

b Sample taken from sample port after Air Stripper (SP3) B - the analyte was detected in an

c Sample taken from sample port after treated water bag filter (SP5) associated blank

d Sample taken from sample port after influent bag filter (SP2)

Shaded cells indicate detected analytes J - the analyte was positively identified,

N - normal sample but the quantitation is an estimation

µg/L - micrograms per liter

Only analytical results for COC's are included in this table. Complete results are available in Attachment C - Analytical Laboratory Results.

Sample Type

& Location

EFFL. BAG FILTER

Sample ID

ASTP INFLUENTa

ASTP EFFLUENTb

ASTP INFLUENT Ca



Date

Monthly TCE

Removed

(kg)

Monthly cDCE

Removed

(kg)

Monthly tDCE

Removed

(kg)

Monthly COC

Removal

(kg)

Cumulative TCE

Removed

(kg)

Cumulative cDCE

Removed

(kg)

Cumulative tDCE

Removed

(kg)

Cumulative COC

Removal

(kg)

01/04/2005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

02/01/2005 0.008 0.003 0.001 0.012 0.008 0.003 0.001 0.012

03/01/2005 0.037 0.014 0.005 0.056 0.045 0.017 0.006 0.068

04/01/2005 0.014 0.005 0.002 0.021 0.059 0.022 0.008 0.089

05/01/2005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.022 0.008 0.089

06/01/2005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.059 0.022 0.008 0.089

07/01/2005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.060 0.022 0.008 0.089

08/01/2005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.060 0.022 0.008 0.089

09/15/2005 0.022 0.009 0.003 0.034 0.082 0.031 0.011 0.12

10/16/2005 0.033 0.014 0.005 0.052 0.12 0.045 0.016 0.18

11/18/2005 0.19 0.077 0.028 0.29 0.30 0.12 0.045 0.47

12/15/2005 0.11 0.046 0.0091 0.16 0.41 0.17 0.054 0.63

01/16/2006 0.16 0.070 0.025 0.25 0.57 0.24 0.079 0.88

02/15/2006 0.12 0.042 0.019 0.18 0.69 0.28 0.098 1.06

03/15/2006 0.13 0.039 0.010 0.18 0.81 0.32 0.109 1.24

04/17/2006 0.17 0.068 0.008 0.25 0.99 0.39 0.116 1.49

05/15/2006 0.14 0.055 0.006 0.20 1.13 0.44 0.122 1.69

06/15/2006 0.17 0.060 0.022 0.25 1.30 0.50 0.144 1.94

07/18/2006 0.10 0.035 0.013 0.15 1.40 0.54 0.157 2.09

08/15/2006 0.13 0.051 0.018 0.19 1.52 0.59 0.175 2.29

09/15/2006 0.12 0.047 0.014 0.18 1.64 0.64 0.189 2.46

Notes:

The May 2005 through August 2005 data is the same as the April 2005 data because the ASTP was shut down from 3/24/05 through 9/8/05

The May and July 2006 quantities are estimated from the previous months process samples.

Table 8

Summary of COC Mass Removed



Table 9Specific Capacity of the Extraction and Injection WellsFruit Avenue Plume Superfund SiteAlbuquerque, New Mexico

DateFlow [gpm]

Static Level [ft]

Pumping Level [ft]

SpCap[gpm/ft] Date

Flow [gpm]

Static Level [ft]

Pumping Level [ft]

SpCap[gpm/ft] Date

Flow [gpm]

Static Level [ft]

Pumping Level [ft]

SpCap[gpm/ft] Date

Flow [gpm]

Static Level [ft]

Pumping Level [ft]

SpCap[gpm/ft]

01/13/2005 15:30 100.0 130.2 100.3 3.34 03/16/2005 9:40 34.7 136.4 148.9 -2.78 03/16/2005 9:40 11.7 62.1 77.1 -0.78 03/16/2005 9:40 21.3 90.5 97.2 -3.18 03/16/200503/17/2005 17:00 90.0 130.2 103.9 3.42 03/17/2005 16:00 21.2 137.3 147.4 -2.10 03/17/2005 16:00 7.6 62.4 78.1 -0.48 03/17/2005 16:00 20.2 91.3 101.6 -1.96

06/15/200509/15/2005 19:00 39.8 132.3 145.1 -3.11 09/15/2005 19:00 5.9 57.6 65.05 -0.79 09/15/2005 19:00 35.1 85.4 95 -3.66

09/09/2005 16:30 116.0 124.9 89.4 3.27 10/26/2005 8:00 50.1 134.7 151.4 -3.00 10/26/2005 8:00 11.1 58.3 88.1 -0.37 10/26/2005 8:00 39.0 85.1 112.1 -1.4410/26/2005 17:30 105.9 127.6 96.3 3.38 10/26/2005 18:00 49.3 135.3 151.4 -3.06 10/26/2005 18:00 11.5 58.3 74.6 -0.71 10/26/2005 18:00 39.7 85.3 102.2 -2.35 10/26/200510/30/2005 16:15 106.1 128.1 96.4 3.35 10/30/2005 8:00 50.6 135.8 154.7 -2.68 10/30/2005 8:00 10/30/2005 8:00 39.3 85.4 106.6 -1.8510/30/2005 8:00 105.9 128.2 96.8 3.37 10/30/2005 14:00 51.1 135.8 155.2 -2.63 10/30/2005 14:00 10.1 58.4 81.1 -0.44 10/30/2005 14:00 39.0 85.1 108.1 -1.70

10/30/2005 14:00 106.8 128.2 96.3 3.35 10/30/2005 16:15 50.6 135.8 155.4 -2.58 10/30/2005 16:15 10.8 58.9 83.1 -0.45 10/30/2005 16:15 39.5 85.3 107.6 -1.7710/31/2005 2:40 106.2 128.1 96.3 3.34 10/31/2005 2:40 50.8 135.8 155.7 -2.55 10/31/2005 2:40 10.1 58.4 81.6 -0.44 10/31/2005 2:40 39.3 85.3 108.6 -1.6910/31/2005 8:00 106.4 128.1 96.9 3.41 10/31/2005 8:00 50.5 135.8 155.9 -2.51 10/31/2005 8:00 11.1 58.4 82.6 -0.46 10/31/2005 8:00 38.7 85.3 108.6 -1.66

11/05/2005 20:15 105.6 128.2 96.9 3.37 11/05/2005 20:15 50.1 135.6 159.2 -2.12 11/05/2005 20:15 10.8 58.4 89.6 -0.35 11/05/2005 20:15 38.1 85.3 113.1 -1.3711/07/2005 11:15 105.3 128.7 96.9 3.31 11/07/2005 11:15 51.3 135.6 159.7 -2.13 11/07/2005 11:15 8.1 58.4 81.1 -0.36 11/07/2005 11:15 40.8 85.3 113.5 -1.4511/18/2005 17:00 106.0 128.8 97.3 3.37 11/18/2005 17:00 51.3 135.6 164.2 -1.79 11/18/2005 17:00 8.6 58.3 85.1 -0.32 11/18/2005 17:00 40.5 85.6 115.2 -1.3711/19/2005 15:00 105.7 128.1 96.4 3.33 11/19/2005 15:00 51.2 136.1 164.7 -1.79 11/19/2005 15:00 8.6 58.4 85.6 -0.32 11/19/2005 15:00 41.3 84.9 114.6 -1.3911/19/2005 20:00 106.5 128.1 96.4 3.36 11/19/2005 20:00 50.5 136.1 162.7 -1.90 11/19/2005 20:00 8.7 58.4 85.1 -0.33 11/19/2005 20:00 41.1 84.9 114.7 -1.3811/23/2005 8:30 105.9 128.7 97.4 3.38 11/23/2005 8:30 50.8 136.3 165.2 -1.76 11/23/2005 8:30 8.6 59.4 85.6 -0.33 11/23/2005 8:30 41 85.3 113.5 -1.45 11/23/2005

11/26/2005 20:00 107.3 128.7 97.3 3.42 11/23/2005 18:00 52.6 135.4 155.9 -2.57 11/23/2005 18:00 9.2 57.8 73.1 -0.60 11/23/2005 18:00 40.7 84.7 99.7 -2.7111/26/2005 20:00 52.2 135.4 155.4 -2.6112/06/2005 19:30 51 137.6 167.7 -1.69

12/08/2005 9:45 105.7 129.7 98.4 3.38 12/07/2005 16:20 49.5 137.6 165.7 -1.76 12/07/2005 16:20 9.1 58.9 86 -0.34 12/07/2005 16:20 41 85.4 112.1 -1.5412/13/2005 106 129.7 98.4 3.39 12/08/2005 9:45 47 136.8 166.7 -1.57 12/08/2005 9:45 8.2 58.3 82.6 -0.34 12/08/2005 9:45 40.3 85 112.6 -1.46

12/13/2005 8:45 106.1 129.8 98.4 3.38 12/13/2005 8:45 46.3 136.6 165.7 -1.59 12/13/2005 8:45 8.2 58.3 82.6 -0.34 12/13/2005 8:45 40 85 112.6 -1.4512/13/2005 17:15 106.6 129.7 100.8 3.69 12/13/2005 17:15 46 136.8 166.7 -1.54 12/13/2005 17:15 9.2 58.4 83.6 -0.37 12/13/2005 17:15 41.1 84.9 113.6 -1.4312/22/2005 9:30 105.3 130.1 98.4 3.32 12/22/2005 9:30 50.3 136.8 156.4 -2.57 12/22/2005 9:30 8.3 58.3 74.1 -0.53 12/22/2005 9:30 43.5 85.7 105.6 -2.19 12/20/2005

01/05/2006 16:00 106.4 130.2 99.9 3.51 01/05/2006 16:00 48.5 138.2 167.5 -1.66 01/05/2006 16:00 6.8 58.9 89.9 -0.22 01/05/2006 16:00 34.9 85.3 118.1 -1.0601/06/2006 8:00 105.9 130.4 99.4 3.42 01/06/2006 8:00 49.2 137.4 166.9 -1.67 01/06/2006 8:00 7.1 57.8 89.6 -0.22 01/06/2006 8:00 35.1 84.6 119.1 -1.02 01/06/2006

01/06/2006 19:00 106 130.4 99.4 3.42 01/06/2006 19:00 54.2 136.7 158.4 -2.50 01/06/2006 19:00 6.9 57.8 73.1 -0.45 01/06/2006 19:00 39.8 85.1 111.6 -1.5001/10/2006 1:00 39.5 85.4 117.6 -1.2301/10/2006 9:20 33.7 85.4 113.1 -1.22

01/11/2006 6:00 106.3 130.2 100.3 3.56 01/11/2006 6:00 54 138.1 163.9 -2.09 01/11/2006 6:00 8.9 59.4 87.1 -0.32 01/11/2006 6:00 33.9 85.3 115.6 -1.1201/13/2006 5:00 8.4 59.9 89.6 -0.2801/13/2006 7:00 8.3 59.9 88.1 -0.29

01/15/2006 17:30 7.8 58.9 91.6 -0.24 01/15/2006 17:30 29.7 84.8 119.6 -0.8501/16/2006 8:30 8.2 58.4 90.6 -0.25 01/16/2006 8:30 29.6 84.9 119.1 -0.87

01/16/2006 22:00 8.2 59.4 91.6 -0.2501/17/2006 9:30 7.2 59.4 87.1 -0.26

01/20/2006 8:15 105.9 129.7 100.9 3.68 01/20/2006 8:15 48.9 136.7 168.7 -1.53 01/20/2006 8:15 6.9 57.8 91.6 -0.20 01/20/2006 7:00 25.2 85.8 119.7 -0.7401/20/2006 16:45 107 129.7 99.9 3.59 01/20/2006 16:45 47.3 136.7 154.7 -2.63 01/20/2006 16:45 6.6 57.8 74.1 -0.40 01/20/2006 16:45 27.3 84.7 103.2 -1.48 01/20/200601/24/2006 8:30 107.4 129.7 99.9 3.60 01/24/2006 8:30 45.5 138.1 156.7 -2.45 01/24/2006 8:30 6.6 59.9 81.6 -0.30 01/24/2006 8:30 26.2 85.9 107.2 -1.2301/24/2006 9:30 106.8 129.7 100.4 3.65 01/24/2006 9:30 50 138.1 157.9 -2.53 01/24/2006 9:30 6.3 59.9 80.6 -0.30 01/24/2006 9:30 26.4 85.9 107.6 -1.22

02/06/2006 1:30 25.7 86.4 119.6 -0.7702/06/2006 9:00 26.7 86.4 119.6 -0.8002/06/2006 9:01 26.7 86.8 119.6 -0.8102/07/2006 9:28 8 86.4 95.1 -0.92

02/07/2006 10:20 107.1 129.2 101.4 3.85 02/07/2006 10:20 13.9 86.4 103.1 -0.8302/08/2006 9:30 107 129.2 101.3 3.84 02/08/2006 9:30 49.1 137.8 165.9 -1.75 02/08/2006 9:30 5.4 57.4 88.1 -0.18 02/08/2006 9:30 13.9 85.9 104.6 -0.74

02/08/2006 18:15 106.6 129.2 100.9 3.77 02/08/2006 18:15 48.5 137.8 164.7 -1.80 02/08/2006 18:15 5.2 57.4 69.1 -0.44 02/08/2006 18:15 13.9 85.9 92.7 -2.04 02/08/200602/09/2006 19:30 107.2 130.2 100.9 3.66 02/09/2006 19:30 49.1 137.6 165.7 -1.75 02/09/2006 19:30 5.2 57.9 70.1 -0.43 02/09/2006 19:30 13.9 85.8 93.7 -1.7602/09/2006 14:40 107 130.2 101.4 3.72 02/09/2006 14:40 50.3 136.4 156.2 -2.54 02/09/2006 14:40 5.7 57.9 71.6 -0.42 02/09/2006 14:40 13.1 85.8 93.6 -1.68 02/09/200602/19/2006 12:30 90.3 130.7 104.4 3.43 02/19/2006 12:30 50 137.8 166.7 -1.73 02/19/2006 12:30 5.7 57.9 80.1 -0.26 02/19/2006 12:30 20.8 85.3 112.1 -0.7802/20/2006 9:00 90 130.7 105.8 3.61 02/20/2006 9:00 48.7 137.8 165.2 -1.78 02/20/2006 9:00 5.7 57.9 78.6 -0.28 02/20/2006 9:00 20.3 85.3 111 -0.7902/22/2006 8:00 91 130.2 105.4 3.67 02/22/2006 8:00 49 137.8 166.7 -1.70 02/22/2006 8:00 5.7 57.6 80.6 -0.25 02/22/2006 8:00 20.3 84.6 113.1 -0.71

02/22/2006 16:30 91.2 130.2 105.4 3.68 02/22/2006 16:30 49.5 137.8 157.4 -2.53 02/22/2006 16:30 5.7 57.6 68.6 -0.52 02/22/2006 16:30 20.3 84.6 96.2 -1.75 02/22/200603/02/2006 18:15 25.3 86.3 104.1 -1.42

03/03/2006 16:00 90.4 129.2 105.3 3.78 03/03/2006 16:00 45.5 139.8 161.4 -2.11 03/03/2006 16:00 25.3 85.3 104.6 -1.3103/04/2006 11:30 94.4 128.7 104.3 3.87 03/04/2006 11:30 47.6 139.6 162.9 -2.0403/07/2006 14:00 94 130.2 104.3 3.63 03/07/2006 14:00 47 138.1 163.4 -1.86 03/07/2006 14:00 7.3 57.9 81.1 -0.31 03/07/2006 14:00 24.7 84.9 107 -1.1203/07/2006 17:00 95.6 130.2 104.4 3.71 03/07/2006 17:00 51.8 138.1 164.7 -1.95 03/07/2006 17:00 8.1 57.9 82.1 -0.33 03/07/2006 17:00 27.1 84.9 108.6 -1.1403/09/2006 7:30 91.5 130.2 104.9 3.62 03/09/2006 7:30 52 137.6 165.4 -1.87 03/09/2006 7:30 8.1 56.8 83.6 -0.30 03/09/2006 7:30 27.3 84.6 109.7 -1.09

03/09/2006 16:00 91.9 130.2 104.8 3.62 03/09/2006 16:00 52.5 137.6 158.2 -2.55 03/09/2006 16:00 8.2 56.8 69.6 -0.64 03/09/2006 16:00 26.8 84.6 96.1 -2.33 03/09/200603/10/2006 23:00 94.9 130.2 103.9 3.61 03/10/2006 23:00 52.7 137.6 160.2 -2.33 03/10/2006 23:00 8.2 57.4 71.1 -0.60 03/10/2006 23:00 26.7 85.3 98.1 -2.0903/13/2006 9:30 89.9 130.2 105.3 3.61 03/13/2006 9:30 52.3 137.6 160.9 -2.24 03/13/2006 9:30 8.1 57.4 71.1 -0.59 03/13/2006 9:30 26.9 85.3 99.3 -1.92

03/15/2006 12:00 95.6 129.7 103.9 3.71 03/15/2006 12:00 52.6 139.3 162.4 -2.28 03/15/2006 12:00 8.4 59.4 74.1 -0.57 03/15/2006 12:00 27.1 85.9 100 -1.9203/23/2006 8:00 91.5 130.2 105.3 3.67 03/23/2006 8:00 51.2 138.1 166 -1.84 03/23/2006 8:00 8.4 56.6 78.1 -0.39 03/23/2006 8:00 27.3 85.1 104.1 -1.44 03/23/2006

03/23/2006 16:30 93.8 130.2 104.4 3.64 03/23/2006 16:30 52.5 137.6 158.4 -2.52 03/23/2006 16:30 8.1 56.6 66.1 -0.85 03/23/2006 16:30 27.3 84.6 96.1 -2.3704/06/2006 7:45 90.1 129.2 104.4 3.63 04/06/2006 7:45 50.8 137.3 168.9 -1.61 04/06/2006 7:45 8.3 55.9 75.6 -0.42 04/06/2006 7:45 27.3 83.4 102.1 -1.46 04/06/2006

04/06/2006 15:45 90 129.2 104.3 3.61 04/06/2006 15:45 51.5 137.3 160.4 -2.23 04/06/2006 15:45 8.2 56.3 66.1 -0.84 04/06/2006 15:45 26.9 83.6 95.6 -2.2404/17/2006 0:00 90.9 129.2 103.8 3.58 04/17/2006 0:00 47.4 137.3 166.6 -1.62 04/17/2006 0:00 8.3 56.3 75.8 -0.43 04/17/2006 0:00 29.6 83.6 105.8 -1.3304/20/2006 7:50 91 127.6 103.9 3.84 04/20/2006 11:30 48.2 134.2 166.7 -1.48 04/20/2006 7:50 8 55.4 75.7 -0.39 04/20/2006 7:50 28.7 83.2 107.1 -1.20

04/20/2006 15:40 94 127.6 102.8 3.79 04/20/2006 15:40 45.6 134.2 154.7 -2.22 04/20/2006 15:40 7.4 55.4 65.5 -0.73 04/20/2006 15:40 28.2 83.2 99 -1.78 04/20/200604/24/2006 14:00 93.2 128.1 102.9 3.70 04/24/2006 14:00 42 137.1 157.2 -2.09 04/24/2006 14:00 8.4 55.9 67.6 -0.72 04/24/2006 14:00 29.4 83.8 100.6 -1.7505/01/2006 2:00 90 128.1 103.9 3.72 05/01/2006 2:00 48.6 136.6 162.9 -1.85 05/01/2006 2:00 8.4 55.9 74.1 -0.46 05/01/2006 2:00 29.3 83.3 108.6 -1.16

05/04/2006 8:00 51.5 135.2 165.2 -1.72 05/04/2006 8:00 8.7 54.8 75.1 -0.43 05/04/2006 8:00 28.2 82.5 110.6 -1.00 05/04/200605/04/2006 17:00 48.9 135.2 157.2 -2.22 05/04/2006 17:00 6.6 54.8 64.3 -0.69 05/04/2006 17:00 30.2 82.5 100.7 -1.66

05/15/2006 3:00 90 127.1 102.4 3.64 05/15/2006 3:00 49.3 135.8 163.2 -1.80 05/15/2006 3:00 6.6 54.9 73.1 -0.36 05/15/2006 3:00 30.3 82.4 110.1 -1.0905/15/2006 4:30 93.5 127.1 101.9 3.71 05/15/2006 4:30 48.5 135.8 161.7 -1.87 05/15/2006 4:30 8.2 54.9 72.1 -0.48 05/15/2006 4:30 29.3 82.4 109.1 -1.1005/18/2006 7:26 89.3 126.2 102.9 3.83 05/18/2006 7:26 49.3 135.2 165.4 -1.63 05/18/2006 7:26 8.2 54.4 75.5 -0.39 05/18/2006 7:26 29.3 81.5 112.1 -0.96 05/18/2006

05/18/2006 16:30 91.5 126.2 101.9 3.77 05/18/2006 16:30 48.5 135.2 156.4 -2.29 05/18/2006 16:30 8.7 54.4 64.4 -0.87 05/18/2006 16:30 28.7 81.5 99.6 -1.5905/19/2006 16:00 89.6 126.6 102.4 3.70 05/19/2006 16:00 50.6 135.6 161.4 -1.96 05/19/2006 16:00 8.7 54.9 66.1 -0.78 05/19/2006 16:00 28.8 81.8 102.1 -1.4205/20/2006 12:00 89.4 126.6 102.8 3.76 05/20/2006 12:00 51 135.1 160.9 -1.98 05/20/2006 12:00 8.1 54.9 65.1 -0.79

05/23/2006 8:40 50.4 135.6 162.2 -1.89 05/23/2006 8:40 8.3 54.9 66.6 -0.7105/23/2006 10:20 93.1 127.1 101.4 3.62 05/23/2006 10:20 48.7 135.6 160.7 -1.94 05/23/2006 10:20 8.3 54.9 67.1 -0.68 05/23/2006 10:20 30.2 82.1 103.6 -1.4006/01/2006 8:15 89.4 126.1 102 3.71 06/01/2006 8:15 49.1 135.6 164.3 -1.71 06/01/2006 8:15 9.1 54.9 71.4 -0.55 06/01/2006 8:15 29.7 82.1 114.5 -0.92 06/01/2006

06/01/2006 16:00 89.5 126.1 102.3 3.76 06/01/2006 16:00 47.6 135.6 155.9 -2.34 06/01/2006 16:00 8.5 54.9 64.1 -0.92 06/01/2006 16:00 29.3 82.1 100.1 -1.6306/02/2006 10:00 46.9 135.8 157.2 -2.19 06/02/2006 10:00 29.3 82.4 102.4 -1.47

06/15/2006 8:00 92.5 125.7 100.9 3.73 06/15/2006 8:00 47 133.7 162.7 -1.62 06/15/2006 8:00 7.9 52.2 72.5 -0.39 06/15/2006 8:00 28.8 80.6 118.1 -0.77 06/15/200606/15/2006 16:00 89.5 125.7 102.3 3.82 06/15/2006 16:00 48.6 133.7 157.2 -2.07 06/15/2006 16:00 10.2 52.2 67.1 -0.68

06/21/2006 6:15 47.6 135.1 163.7 -1.66 06/21/2006 6:15 10 53.9 76.7 -0.4406/21/2006 14:40 89.4 125.6 101.9 3.77 06/21/2006 14:40 50.1 134.8 165.4 -1.64 06/21/2006 14:40 9.6 53.4 74.5 -0.4506/24/2006 22:40 89.8 125.2 101.9 3.85 06/24/2006 22:40 48.8 134.8 164.6 -1.64 06/24/2006 22:40 8.9 52.9 71.9 -0.4706/27/2006 2:40 89.8 125.1 101.9 3.87 06/27/2006 2:40 50.1 135.1 166.2 -1.61 06/27/2006 2:40 9.8 53.9 77.1 -0.4206/28/2006 2:20 89.9 125.6 101.8 3.78 06/28/2006 2:20 49.8 134.6 164.7 -1.65 06/28/2006 2:20 10.4 53.4 77.6 -0.4306/29/2006 8:00 90.3 125.7 101.9 3.79 06/29/2006 8:00 50.8 134.6 165.7 -1.63 06/29/2006 8:00 10 53.4 80.1 -0.37 06/29/2006

06/29/2006 18:00 89 125.7 101.9 3.74 06/29/2006 15:00 50.1 134.6 158.7 -2.08 06/29/2006 15:00 11.6 53.4 70.1 -0.6906/29/2006 21:00 89.7 125.7 102.4 3.85 06/29/2006 21:00 51 134.6 160.4 -1.98 06/29/2006 21:00 14 53.4 74.1 -0.6807/06/2006 11:30 89 125.8 102.4 3.80 07/06/2006 11:30 49.4 134.6 164.5 -1.65 07/06/2006 11:30 13.8 53.4 82.4 -0.4807/12/2006 17:15 87.6 127.3 106.4 4.19 07/12/2006 17:15 49.5 134.7 163.2 -1.74 07/12/2006 17:15 13.6 52.9 79.6 -0.5107/14/2006 5:00 91.4 126.7 102.4 3.76 07/14/2006 5:00 49.5 135.8 165.7 -1.66 07/14/2006 5:00 13.7 53.4 82.6 -0.47

07/17/2006 13:00 90.5 126.1 102.4 3.82 07/17/2006 13:00 47.5 134.3 164.3 -1.58 07/17/2006 13:00 12.8 52.9 84.1 -0.4107/18/2006 20:00 90.1 126.2 102.4 3.79 07/18/2006 20:00 51.5 134.8 166.2 -1.64 07/18/2006 20:00 13.9 52.9 85.2 -0.4307/27/2006 8:00 89.4 126.2 103.4 3.92 07/27/2006 8:00 42.5 134.6 163.9 -1.45 07/27/2006 8:00 8.8 52.4 80.6 -0.31 07/27/2006

07/27/2006 15:45 87 126.2 103.3 3.80 07/27/2006 15:45 49.4 134.6 158.4 -2.08 07/27/2006 15:45 12.1 52.4 70.1 -0.6808/08/2006 14:45 86.6 127.6 105.3 3.88 08/08/2006 14:45 48.0 134.3 166.2 -1.50 08/08/2006 14:45 11.6 52.9 83.5 -0.3808/08/2006 16:00 88.5 127.6 104.9 3.90 08/08/2006 16:00 45.5 134.3 162.2 -1.63 08/08/2006 16:00 13.9 52.9 84.6 -0.4408/10/2006 8:00 105.1 128.1 100.8 3.85 08/10/2006 8:00 43.2 134.8 163.7 -1.49 08/10/2006 8:00 12.8 50.1 87.6 -0.34 08/10/2006

08/10/2006 16:00 105.1 127.6 100.9 3.94 08/10/2006 16:00 47.5 134.8 155.4 -2.31 08/10/2006 16:00 13.8 50.1 73.1 -0.6008/11/2006 18:00 102.4 127.6 101.4 3.91 08/11/2006 18:00 47.8 134.6 159.9 -1.89 08/11/2006 18:00 13.8 51.9 77.5 -0.5408/24/2006 10:40 103.6 128.7 102.3 3.92 08/24/2006 10:40 45.9 135.3 165.6 -1.5108/24/2006 15:54 103.4 128.7 101.9 3.86 08/24/2006 15:54 46.2 135.3 155.9 -2.24 08/24/200608/26/2006 17:35 08/26/2006 17:35 46 134.3 159.9 -1.8009/07/2006 7:51 104.9 128.1 101.3 3.91 09/07/2006 7:51 47.8 132.3 164 -1.51 09/07/2006

09/07/2006 14:07 106.8 128.1 100.8 3.91 09/07/2006 14:07 46.7 132.3 152.7 -2.29

Back flushing EventLower Injection WellExtraction Well Single Injection Well Upper Injection Well



VERSION 1.0



Figures


VERSION 1.0



R o m a A v e

D r M a r t i n L u t h e r K i n g J r A v e

E

T i j e r a s A v e

Hig

h S

t

Fruit Ave

1st S

t

John

St

Ave

nd

Bro

adw

ay B

lvd

Lomas Blvd

Fruit AvenuePlume Ground Water

Treatment System

BNSF Rail

D2E-P1

D2E/I3

I2/D1E-I1Air Stripper

Treatment Plant

Albuquerque RegionalMedical Center

Fruit Avenue Plume Site Boundary

Approximate Plume Boundary

Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund SiteAlbuquerque, NM

Figure 1

Source:

FILENAME: \\texan\is_proj\ J:\FruitAve\April2005\mxd\Figure1_SiteBoundary.mxd

LegendLTM Monitor Well Site Map

August 2005

0 250 500 750 1,000Feet

Existing and Potential Receptor WellsRailroadPipeline

Jan-

05

Feb-0

5

Mar-0

5

Apr-0

5

May-0

5

Jun-

05

Jul-0

5

Aug-0

5

Sep-0

5

Oct-05

Nov-0

5

Dec-0

5

Jan-

06

Feb-0

6

Mar-0

6

Apr-0

6

May-0

6

Jun-

06

Jul-0

6

Aug-0

6

Sep-0

6

Vol

ume

of W

ater

[mill

ion

gallo

ns]

0

10

20

30

40Cumulative Extraction Well Flow Cumulative Treated Water Injected

Figure 3. Monthly and Cumulative Volume of Water Extracted and Injected

Jan-

05

Feb-0

5

Mar-0

5

Apr-0

5

May-0

5

Jun-

05

Jul-0

5

Aug-0

5

Sep-0

5

Oct-05

Nov-0

5

Dec-0

5

Jan-

06

Feb-0

6

Mar-0

6

Apr-0

6

May-0

6

Jun-

06

Jul-0

6

Aug-0

6

Sep-0

6

Vol

ume

of W

ater

[mill

ion

gallo

ns]

0

1

2

3

4

5Monthly Extraction Well Flow Monthly Treated Water Injected

Figure 4. TCE Concentration in Untreated Influent Ground Water

Sample Date

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Con

tam

inan

t Con

cent

ratio

n [µ

g/L]

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Field DataLinear Regression95% Confidence Interval for the Regression Line

USEPA MCL for TCE

Jan-

05

Feb-0

5

Mar-0

5

Apr-0

5

May-0

5

Jun-

05

Jul-0

5

Aug-0

5

Sep-0

5

Oct-05

Nov-0

5

Dec-0

5

Jan-

06

Feb-0

6

Mar-0

6

Apr-0

6

May-0

6

Jun-

06

Jul-0

6

Aug-0

6

Sep-0

6

Cum

ulat

ive

Mas

s R

emov

ed [k

g]

0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2.00

2.25

2.50

2.75Cumulative TCE Removed Cumulative cDCE Removed Cumulative tDCE Removed Cumulative Total COCs Removed

Figure 5. Monthly and CumulativeContaminant Mass Removal

Jan-

05

Feb-0

5

Mar-0

5

Apr-0

5

May-0

5

Jun-

05

Jul-0

5

Aug-0

5

Sep-0

5

Oct-05

Nov-0

5

Dec-0

5

Jan-

06

Feb-0

6

Mar-0

6

Apr-0

6

May-0

6

Jun-

06

Jul-0

6

Aug-0

6

Sep-0

6

Mon

thly

Mas

s R

emov

ed [k

g]

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30Monthly TCE Removed Monthly cDCE Removed Monthly tDCE Removed Monthly Total COCs Removed


VERSION 1.0



Attachment A

Field Notes


VERSION 1.0



Attachment B

Non-SCADA Data – Inspection Log Forms


VERSION 1.0



Attachment C

Analytical Results


VERSION 1.0



UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYRegion 6 Laboratory

10625 Fallstone Road, Houston, TX 77099Phone: (281)983-2100 Fax: (281)983-2248

Sample Collection Date(s)--

Site Name Fruit Avenue Plume

Contact Bart Canellas (6SF-LT)

Report Date 09/07/06

Environmental Services Branch

Project # 06SF254

Final Analytical Report

08/16/06

0608025Work Order(s)

Analyses included in this report:VOA CLP Low Level (0.5)

Report Narrative

Reporting limits are adjusted for sample size and matrix interference.

Standard procedures for quality assurance and quality control were followed in the analysis andreporting of the sample results. The results apply only to the samples tested. This final reportshould only be reproduced in full.

Richard McMillinRegion 6 Laboratory Branch ChiefDouglas A. Lipka

Report Approvals:

Region 6 Laboratory Manager

Comments:

Received by and Date__________________________________________________/_____/_______

Christy WarrenData Management CoordinatorRegion 6 Laboratory6MD-HS

Please sign and date this form below and return it with any comments to:

Please have the U.S. EPA Project Manager/Officer call the Data Management Coordinator at 3-2137 for any comments or questions.

Date Transmitted: _____/_____/_______

/ /Data Management Coordinator: Christy Warren

Houston, Texas 77099

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Region 6 Environmental Services Branch Laboratory10625 Fallstone Road

Data Management Coordinator Signature Date

The laboratory routinely disposes of samples 90 days after all analyses have been completed. If you have a need to hold these samples in custody longer than 90 days, please sign below.

____________________________________________ ___________________Signature Date

Please provide a reason for holding:

Sample Receipt and Disposal

Environmental Protection Agency

Region 6 Laboratory10625 Fallstone Road, Houston, TX 77099

Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248

Station ID Laboratory ID Sample Type Date Collected

ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES

Date Received

0608025-01 Liquid 08/17/06 09:25FAP-SP1-060816 8/16/06 9:30

0608025-02 Liquid 08/17/06 09:25FAP-SP5-060816 8/16/06 9:15

0608025-03 Liquid 08/17/06 09:25FAP-TB-060816 8/16/06 9:05

Page 1 of 15Report Name: 0608025 FINAL 09 07 06 0658



Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248

0608025-01

Sample Qualifiers:B6H1708Batch:

Lab ID:

LiquidSample Type:Date Collected: 08/16/06

Station ID: FAP-SP1-060816Volatiles by CLP OLC03.2 - GC/MS (Low Level)

Sample Volume: 25ml

%Recovery%Recovery

Prepared AnalyzedLimitsResult Analyte

QualifiersAnalyte µg/l

Surrogates

9.43 08/18/06 81-12494.3Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 08/18/06 9.68 "86-11596.8Surr: Toluene-d8 "9.59 "76-11595.9Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene "

AnalyzedPreparedDilutionLimitReporting

QualifiersResultµg/lAnalyte (CAS Number)

Analyte

Targets

0.5 08/18/06 08/18/06 1UDichlorodifluoromethane (75-71-8)0.5 " ""UChloromethane (74-87-3)0.5 " ""UVinyl chloride (75-01-4)0.5 " ""UBromomethane (74-83-9)0.5 " ""UChloroethane (75-00-3)0.5 " ""UTrichlorofluoromethane (75-69-4)0.5 " ""U1,1-Dichloroethene (75-35-4)0.5 " ""UCarbon disulfide (75-15-0)0.5 " ""U1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (76-13-1)5.0 " ""UAcetone (67-64-1)0.5 " ""UMethylene chloride (75-09-2)0.5 " ""UMethyl acetate (79-20-9)

1.9 " " "0.5trans-1,2-Dichloroethene (156-60-5)5.6 " " "0.5cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (156-59-2)

0.5 " ""UMethyl tert-butyl ether (1634-04-4)0.5 " ""U1,1-Dichloroethane (75-34-3)5.0 " ""U2-Butanone (78-93-3)0.5 " ""UChloroform (67-66-3)0.5 " ""U1,2-Dichloroethane (107-06-2)0.5 " ""U1,1,1-Trichloroethane (71-55-6)0.5 " ""UCyclohexane (110-82-7)0.5 " ""UCarbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)0.5 " ""UBenzene (71-43-2)

13.6 " " "0.5Trichloroethene (79-01-6)0.5 " ""UMethylcyclohexane (108-87-2)0.5 " ""U1,2-Dichloropropane (78-87-5)0.5 " ""UBromodichloromethane (75-27-4)0.5 " ""Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene (10061-01-5)0.5 " ""Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene (10061-02-6)




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248

0608025-01


Lab ID:



Sample Volume: 25ml



Analyte

Targets (Continued)

0.5 08/18/06 08/18/06 1U1,1,2-Trichloroethane (79-00-5)0.5 " ""UDibromochloromethane (124-48-1)0.5 " ""UBromoform (75-25-2)5.0 " ""U4-Methyl-2-pentanone (108-10-1)0.5 " ""UToluene (108-88-3)0.5 " ""UTetrachloroethene (127-18-4)5.0 " ""U2-Hexanone (591-78-6)0.5 " ""U1,2-Dibromoethane (106-93-4)0.5 " ""UChlorobenzene (108-90-7)0.5 " ""UEthylbenzene (100-41-4)1.0 " ""Umeta-/para-Xylene (na)0.5 " ""Uortho-Xylene (95-47-6)0.5 " ""UStyrene (100-42-5)0.5 " ""UIsopropylbenzene (98-82-8)0.5 " ""U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (79-34-5)0.5 " ""U1,3-Dichlorobenzene (541-73-1)0.5 " ""U1,4-Dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)0.5 " ""U1,2-Dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)0.5 " ""U1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (96-12-8)0.5 " ""U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (120-82-1)

Vinyl Chloride and Styrene may be biased low.This sample was received at pH 2.




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248

0608025-02


Lab ID:



Sample Volume: 25ml

%Recovery%Recovery



Surrogates

9.39 08/18/06 81-12493.9Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 08/18/06 9.86 "86-11598.6Surr: Toluene-d8 "10.1 "76-115101Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene "



Analyte

Targets

0.5 08/18/06 08/18/06 1UDichlorodifluoromethane (75-71-8)0.5 " ""UChloromethane (74-87-3)0.5 " ""UVinyl chloride (75-01-4)0.5 " ""UBromomethane (74-83-9)0.5 " ""UChloroethane (75-00-3)0.5 " ""UTrichlorofluoromethane (75-69-4)0.5 " ""U1,1-Dichloroethene (75-35-4)0.5 " ""UCarbon disulfide (75-15-0)0.5 " ""U1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (76-13-1)5.0 " ""UAcetone (67-64-1)0.5 " ""UMethylene chloride (75-09-2)0.5 " ""UMethyl acetate (79-20-9)0.5 " ""Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene (156-60-5)0.5 " ""Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene (156-59-2)0.5 " ""UMethyl tert-butyl ether (1634-04-4)0.5 " ""U1,1-Dichloroethane (75-34-3)5.0 " ""U2-Butanone (78-93-3)0.5 " ""UChloroform (67-66-3)0.5 " ""U1,2-Dichloroethane (107-06-2)0.5 " ""U1,1,1-Trichloroethane (71-55-6)0.5 " ""UCyclohexane (110-82-7)0.5 " ""UCarbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)0.5 " ""UBenzene (71-43-2)0.5 " ""UTrichloroethene (79-01-6)0.5 " ""UMethylcyclohexane (108-87-2)0.5 " ""U1,2-Dichloropropane (78-87-5)0.5 " ""UBromodichloromethane (75-27-4)0.5 " ""Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene (10061-01-5)0.5 " ""Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene (10061-02-6)




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248

0608025-02


Lab ID:



Sample Volume: 25ml



Analyte

Targets (Continued)


If biological activity is present, then aromatics may be biased low.This sample was received at pH 5.




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248

0608025-03


Lab ID:


Station ID: FAP-TB-060816Volatiles by CLP OLC03.2 - GC/MS (Low Level)

Sample Volume: 25ml

%Recovery%Recovery



Surrogates

9.54 08/18/06 81-12495.4Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 08/18/06 9.56 "86-11595.6Surr: Toluene-d8 "9.35 "76-11593.5Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene "



Analyte

Targets

0.5 08/18/06 08/18/06 1UDichlorodifluoromethane (75-71-8)0.5 " ""UChloromethane (74-87-3)0.5 " ""UVinyl chloride (75-01-4)0.5 " ""UBromomethane (74-83-9)0.5 " ""UChloroethane (75-00-3)0.5 " ""UTrichlorofluoromethane (75-69-4)0.5 " ""U1,1-Dichloroethene (75-35-4)0.5 " ""UCarbon disulfide (75-15-0)0.5 " ""U1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (76-13-1)5.0 " ""UAcetone (67-64-1)0.5 " ""UMethylene chloride (75-09-2)0.5 " ""UMethyl acetate (79-20-9)0.5 " ""Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene (156-60-5)0.5 " ""Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene (156-59-2)0.5 " ""UMethyl tert-butyl ether (1634-04-4)0.5 " ""U1,1-Dichloroethane (75-34-3)5.0 " ""U2-Butanone (78-93-3)0.5 " ""UChloroform (67-66-3)0.5 " ""U1,2-Dichloroethane (107-06-2)0.5 " ""U1,1,1-Trichloroethane (71-55-6)0.5 " ""UCyclohexane (110-82-7)0.5 " ""UCarbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)0.5 " ""UBenzene (71-43-2)0.5 " ""UTrichloroethene (79-01-6)0.5 " ""UMethylcyclohexane (108-87-2)0.5 " ""U1,2-Dichloropropane (78-87-5)0.5 " ""UBromodichloromethane (75-27-4)0.5 " ""Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene (10061-01-5)0.5 " ""Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene (10061-02-6)




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248

0608025-03


Lab ID:


Station ID: FAP-TB-060816Volatiles by CLP OLC03.2 - GC/MS (Low Level)

Sample Volume: 25ml



Analyte

Targets (Continued)


If biological activity is present, then aromatics may be biased low.This sample was received at pH 5.




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248

Volatiles by CLP OLC03.2 - GC/MS (Low Level) - Quality Control

Batch: B6H1708 Sample Type: Liquid

Prepared: 8/18/2006 Analyzed: 8/18/2006 Blank (B6H1708-BLK1)

Limits%REC

%RECLevelSpikeAnalyte

QualifierResult

ANALYTE µg/L

Surrogates

9.59 81-124Surr: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95.9 10.09.90 86-115Surr: Toluene-d8 99.0 10.09.82 76-115Surr: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.2 10.0


ANALYTE LimitAnalyte

QualifiersResult Reportingµg/l

Targets

UDichlorodifluoromethane 0.5 UChloromethane 0.5 UVinyl chloride 0.5 UBromomethane 0.5 UChloroethane 0.5 UTrichlorofluoromethane 0.5 U1,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 UCarbon disulfide 0.5 U1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroet

hane0.5

UAcetone 5.0 UMethylene chloride 0.5 UMethyl acetate 0.5 Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 UMethyl tert-butyl ether 0.5 U1,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 U2-Butanone 5.0 UChloroform 0.5 U1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 U1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248




ANALYTE LimitAnalyte

QualifiersResult Reportingµg/l

Targets (Continued)

UCyclohexane 0.5 UCarbon tetrachloride 0.5 UBenzene 0.5 UTrichloroethene 0.5 UMethylcyclohexane 0.5 U1,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 UBromodichloromethane 0.5 Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 U1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 UDibromochloromethane 0.5 UBromoform 0.5 U4-Methyl-2-pentanone 5.0 UToluene 0.5 UTetrachloroethene 0.5 U2-Hexanone 5.0 U1,2-Dibromoethane 0.5 UChlorobenzene 0.5 UEthylbenzene 0.5 Umeta-/para-Xylene 1.0 Uortho-Xylene 0.5 UStyrene 0.5 UIsopropylbenzene 0.5 U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 U1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.5 U1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.5 U1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.5 U1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.5 U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.5




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248



Prepared: 8/18/2006 Analyzed: 8/18/2006 LCS (B6H1708-BS1)

Limits%REC


QualifierResult

ANALYTE µg/L

Surrogates



ANALYTE Limit Level %REC LimitsAnalyte

QualifiersResult Reporting %RECSpikeµg/l

Targets

6.8 64-17668.0Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.5 10.0 8.5 70-16885.0Chloromethane 0.5 10.0 8.8 69-15388.0Vinyl chloride 0.5 10.0 9.5 73-15595.0Bromomethane 0.5 10.0 9.7 68-13797.0Chloroethane 0.5 10.0 9.8 74-13798.0Trichlorofluoromethane 0.5 10.0 8.8 71-14288.01,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 10.0 8.2 58-15582.0Carbon disulfide 0.5 10.0 11.0 85-1421101,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroet

hane0.5 10.0

11.3 46-159113Acetone 5.0 10.0 9.5 75-12695.0Methylene chloride 0.5 10.0 10.1 70-137101Methyl acetate 0.5 10.0 8.7 73-12787.0trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 10.0 9.9 83-12199.0cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.5 10.0 10.7 82-124107Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.5 10.0 10.1 81-1231011,1-Dichloroethane 0.5 10.0 11.4 57-1531142-Butanone 5.0 10.0 10.3 83-119103Chloroform 0.5 10.0 10.1 81-1201011,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 10.0 10.6 82-1241061,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.5 10.0




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248




ANALYTE Limit Level %REC LimitsAnalyte

QualifiersResult Reporting %RECSpikeµg/l

Targets (Continued)

9.7 77-14197.0Cyclohexane 0.5 10.0 10.3 81-124103Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 10.0 9.9 80-12299.0Benzene 0.5 10.0 10.0 79-121100Trichloroethene 0.5 10.0 10.0 86-126100Methylcyclohexane 0.5 10.0 10.7 82-1191071,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 10.0 10.5 82-118105Bromodichloromethane 0.5 10.0 10.5 78-120105cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 10.0 10.5 75-123105trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 10.0 11.0 81-1161101,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 10.0 10.5 79-112105Dibromochloromethane 0.5 10.0 10.4 76-120104Bromoform 0.5 10.0 10.8 79-1301084-Methyl-2-pentanone 5.0 10.0 10.1 81-122101Toluene 0.5 10.0 10.1 81-120101Tetrachloroethene 0.5 10.0 11.5 69-1381152-Hexanone 5.0 10.0 10.6 81-1171061,2-Dibromoethane 0.5 10.0 10.3 82-119103Chlorobenzene 0.5 10.0 10.2 79-126102Ethylbenzene 0.5 10.0 20.8 73-131104meta-/para-Xylene 1.0 20.0 10.3 79-124103ortho-Xylene 0.5 10.0 9.5 65-12695.0Styrene 0.5 10.0 11.0 82-128110Isopropylbenzene 0.5 10.0 10.8 81-1171081,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 10.0 10.9 82-1191091,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.5 10.0 10.9 82-1201091,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.5 10.0 10.7 81-1171071,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.5 10.0 11.3 74-1221131,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 0.5 10.0 11.1 78-1191111,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.5 10.0




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248



Prepared: 8/18/2006 Analyzed: 8/18/2006 Matrix Spike (B6H1708-MS1)

Source: 0608025-01

Limits%REC


QualifierResult

ANALYTE µg/L

Surrogates


Prepared: 8/18/2006 Analyzed: 8/18/2006 Matrix Spike (B6H1708-MS1)

Source: 0608025-01

ANALYTE Limit Level Result %REC LimitsAnalyte

QualifiersResult Reporting %RECSourceSpikeµg/l

Targets

9.2 61-14592.01,1-Dichloroethene 0.5 10.0 10.2 76-127102Benzene 0.5 10.0 24.8 13.6 71-120112Trichloroethene 0.5 10.0 10.2 76-125102Toluene 0.5 10.0 10.3 75-130103Chlorobenzene 0.5 10.0

Prepared: 8/18/2006 Analyzed: 8/18/2006 Matrix Spike Dup (B6H1708-MSD1)

Source: 0608025-01

Limits%REC


QualifierResult

ANALYTE µg/L

Surrogates





Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248



Prepared: 8/18/2006 Analyzed: 8/18/2006 Matrix Spike Dup (B6H1708-MSD1)

Source: 0608025-01

ANALYTE Limit Level Result %REC Limits RPD LimitAnalyte

QualifiersResult Reporting RPD%RECSourceSpikeµg/l

Targets

3.21 9.5 61-14595.01,1-Dichloroethene 14 0.5 10.0 10.3 0.9876-127103Benzene 11 0.5 10.0

2.64 25.1 13.6 71-120115Trichloroethene 14 0.5 10.01.94 10.4 76-125104Toluene 13 0.5 10.01.92 10.5 75-130105Chlorobenzene 13 0.5 10.0




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248




Phone:(281)983-2100 Fax:(281)983-2248

Notes and Definitions

A This sample was extracted at a single acid pH.

HTS Sample was prepared and/or analyzed past recommended holding time. Concentrations should be considered minimum values.

AES Atomic Emission Spectrometer

CVAA Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption

ECD Electron Capture Detector

GC Gas Chromatograph

GFAA Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption

ICP Inductively Coupled Plasma

MS Mass Spectrometer

NA Not Applicable

NPD Nitrogen Phosphorous Detector

NR Not Reported

TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

U Undetected

# Out of QC limits

Initial pressure in air analyses is the pressure at which the canister was received in psia (pounds per square inch absolute pressure).

The pH reported for Volatile liquid samples was tested using a 0-14 pH indicator strip for the purpose of verifying chemical preservation.

The statistical software used for the reporting of toxicity data is ToxStat 3.5,Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming 1996.



VERSION 1.0



Attachment D

COC Recovery Calculations


VERSION 1.0



Reporting Period Date

Extraction Well Totalizer

(gal)Begin August 15, 2006 33,554,432End September 15, 2006 35,861,299

Sample Location Sample ID Sample Date TCE cDCE tDCE UnitsInfluent water FAP SP-1 0600816 08/16/2006 13.6 5.6 1.9 µg/LEffluent water FAP SP-5 0600816 08/16/2006 0.25 0.25 0.25 µg/L

Effluent concentrations are the detected concentration or 1/2 of the MDL which ever is greater.

cDCE tDCECI = 13.6 µg/L = Average Concentration in SP-1 (influent) Water Sample 5.6 1.9CE = 0.3 µg/L = Average Concentration in SP-5 (Effluent) Water Sample 0.3 0.3ΔC = 13.4 µg/L = Concentration Removed 5.4 1.7V2 = 35,861,299 Gallons = Final Extraction Well Totalizer ReadingV1 = 33,554,432 Gallons = Initial Extraction Well Totalizer ReadingΔV = 2.31E+06 Gallons = Volume of Ground Water TreatedΔV = 8.73E+06 Liters = Volume of Ground Water Treated this Period 8.73E+06 8.73E+06

M (mass) = ΔC * ΔV * ( 10-9 kg/µg)= 13.4 µg/L * 8.73x10^6 Liters * 10-9 kg/ug

M (mass) = 0.117 Kilograms = Mass of Contaminant Removed from Ground Water this Period 0.047 0.0144

Fundamental Values Data Table

Attachment DCOC Recovery Calculations

Fruit Avenue Plume Superfund Site - Air Stripper Treatment Plant, Albuquerque, New Mexico(August 15 to September 15, 2006)

Effective COC Recovery Calculation (Based on Water Concentration)Trichloroethene



VERSION 1.0



MONTHLY CLEANUP STATUS REPORT - NO. 11 FOR THE PERIOD … · CLEANUP STATUS REPORT NO. 11 –...

Documents

Transcript of MONTHLY CLEANUP STATUS REPORT - NO. 11 FOR THE PERIOD … · CLEANUP STATUS REPORT NO. 11 –...