Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries...

20
Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853; Catarina Ferreira nº 35671

Transcript of Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries...

Page 1: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species

Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection

2014Tamara Moedas nº 47853; Catarina Ferreira nº 35671

Page 2: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Molecular Tools

• Allozyme markers;

• Mitochondrial DNA markers (mtDNA);

• Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP);

• Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD);

• Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP);

• Microsatellite markers;

• Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP);

• Expressed sequence tags (ESTs).

Page 3: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Allozyme Markers

Page 4: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

• Advantages:

o Low cost;o the rapid technique;o Ease to use;o Usually used in fishery

genetics.

• Disadvantages:

o Heterozygote deficiencies due to null alleles;

o Limited number of available allozyme loci precludes their use in large-scale genome mapping;

o Changes in DNA sequence reduce the level of detectable variation

o Are not selectively neutral.

Page 5: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Mitochondrial DNA Markers

Page 6: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

• Advantages:

o High levels of polymorphism;

o It evolves much faster than coding regions of DNA;

o Multiple copies in each cell.

• Disadvantages:

o Back mutation;o Parallel substitution;o Rate heterogeneity or

mutational hot spots.

Page 7: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP)

Page 8: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

• Advantage:

o Codominant markers.

• Disadvantages:

o Low level of polymorphism;

o Low power in revealing genetic variation;

o Difficult and time-consuming to develop markers in species lacking molecular information.

Page 9: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Markers (RAPD)

Page 10: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

• Advantages:

o High levels of polymorphisms;

o Allows the simultaneous analysis of many loci;

o Markers are inherited in dominant fashion.

• Disadvantage:

o Special equipment.

Page 11: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP)

Page 12: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

• Advantages:

o Analysis many loci simultaneously;

o Revealed polymorphisms;

o Inherited as dominant markers;

o High reproducibility.

• Disadvantage:

o Special equipment.

Page 13: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Microsatellite markers

Page 14: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

• Advantages:

o Hight Abundant in all species;

o Distributed in the genome on all chromosomes;

o Loci are small;o Polymorphic;o Codominant markers.

• Disadvantage:

o Hight expensive.

Page 15: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP)

Page 16: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

• Advantages:

o Most abundant polymorphism in organism;

o Reveal hidden polymorphism;

o Co-dominant markers.

• Disadvantages:

o Requires specialized equipment;

o Large-scale analysis, depends on the availability of expensive, cutting-edge equipment.

Page 17: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Expressed sequence tags (ESTs)

Page 18: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

• Advantages:

o Identify genes and analyze their expression by expression profiling;

o Rapid and at genes expressed in specific tissue types;

o Development of cDNA microarrays;

o Great value in genome mapping.

o Disadvantage:

o Identification of polymorphic ESTs is necessary for genome mapping.

Page 19: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Conclusions

Markers Linking Mapping

Population Studies

Maternal Linkage

Hybrid Identific

-ation

Physical Mapping

Comparati- ve

MappingPolymorph

-ism

AllozymeMarkers LOW

mtDNA

RFLP LOW

RAPD INTERMEDIATE

AFLP HIGH

Microsat-ellites

markersHIGH

SNP HIGH

EST’s LOW

Page 20: Molecular Tools for Aiding and Breeding of Aquaculture Species Masters in Aquaculture and Fisheries Genetic and Selection 2014 Tamara Moedas nº 47853;

Biblography• Liu, Z. J., Cordes, J. F., 2004. “DNA marker technologies and their

applications in aquaculture genetics”. Aquaculture 238, pp. 1-37;

• Magoulas, A.. “Application of molecular markers to aquaculture

and broodstock management with special emphasis on

microsatellite DNA”. CIHEM-Options Mediterraneennes, pp. 153-

168;• Chauhan,T., Rajiv, K.,2010. “Molecular markers and their

applications in fisheries and aquaculture”. University of Delhi, Delhi, India.