Elementary Particle Physics Status and Prospects Mogens Dam Niels Bohr Institute September 4, 2002.
Mogens Lykketoft The Danish Model Mogens Lykketoft fm. Minister for Finance.
-
Upload
jordan-patterson -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Mogens Lykketoft The Danish Model Mogens Lykketoft fm. Minister for Finance.
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
The Danish Model
Mogens Lykketoft
fm. Minister for Finance
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Denmark 2008
• Top 3 in World Economic Forum’s index on Competition
• World champion in Transparency International Index
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Compared to USA (immediately before 2008)
• Real income per capita, productivity, unemployment, inflation very much the same
• Denmark big surpluses on balance of payment and public finance
• Taxes and social expenses constitute twice as big a share of GDP in Denmark as in the US
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Compared to USA (immediately before 2008)
• Danish model model beneficial for those with low income and in major health risks or risk of being unemployed ( social insurance/ tax financing instead of private insurance or paying market prices in health, higher education, old age care and kindergartens)
• DK: 9 % have less than half of median income in Denmark;
• USA: 21%
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Fundamental Features
• Good level of basic education – socialize and improvise
• Increasing share of population gets higher education
• Small companies with high ability to adapt to changing market conditions
• Very liberal industrial policy and early opening up for foreign competition
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Fundamental Features
• Investment encouraged through favourable depreciation and low company tax
• Interaction: industrial development, welfare and environment protection
• Interaction: high minimum wages and supplementary training and education
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Fundamental Features
• Interaction: high minimum wages and supplementary training and education
• Easy to hire and fire – high tax-paid compensation for unskilled unemployed
• Increase in female participation: most important revolution
• thus: socialization of care for children, ill and old people
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Fundamental Features
• Legislation about holidays, pre-pension scheme
• Build-up of major labour market supplementary pensions since 1980’ies
• Welfare reforms – 2006 decision about increasing retirement age as population lives longer
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Oil crises, reforms and new unemployment ( 1973-1993)
• Increasing unemployment, inflation and devaluations 1973-1982
• Stop for automatic indexation of wages, fixed exchange rates, tax on pension funds, - new increase in employment
• Tax reform – austerity measures, depressed real estate market, big unemployment
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Modernising the Danish Model - 200.000 more jobs (1993-2001)
• Unemployment and structural unemployment• Kick-starting – real estate credit, public
infrastructure investment, temporary tax reductions
• Structural reforms of labour market and tax system
• Investment in education and welfare (health, kindergartens, care for the elderly)
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Danish Model under pressure ( 2001-2010)
• Tax freeze and tough regulation immigration • Privatization and ‘freedom of choice’• Weakening of the trade unions – fewer union
members and fewer insured against unemployment
• Bubble economy due to easy and excessive private borrowing – explosion in real estate values and share prices
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Danish Model under pressure ( 2001-2010)
• More unequal distribution of wealth and income
• Up to 2008 impressive rise in employment through both migrant workforce from especially Eastern Europe and unexpected fall in an already low unemployment
Mogens Lykketoft • www.lykketoft.dk
Danish Model under pressure ( 2001-2010)
• Bubble bursting – rise in unemployment (again in spite of new wave of major tax reductions in preparation for next general election)
• Potentially weakened popular support for the welfare model (greater threat than ageing population, current financial crisis and global competition)