Modern Wireless Chapter 5 Communication Spread Spectrum and Code...
-
Upload
dangkhuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
233 -
download
1
Transcript of Modern Wireless Chapter 5 Communication Spread Spectrum and Code...
1
CH05-1
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
Modern Wireless
Communication
Simon Haykin, Michael Moher
CH05-2
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
Chapter 5
Spread Spectrum and Code-
Division Multiple Access
CH05-3
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• 5.1 Introduction
• 5.2 Direct-Sequence Modulation– 5.2.1 The Spreading Equation
– 5.2.2 Matched-Filter Receiver– 5.2.3 Performance with Interference
• 5.3 Spreading Codes
– 5.3.1 Walsh-Hadamard– 5.3.2 Orthogonal Variable Spreading Factors (OVSF
– 5.3.3 Maximal-Length Sequences– 5.3.4 Scramblers– 5.3.5 Gold Codes
– 5.3.6 Random Sequences
• 5.4 The advantages of CDMA for Wireless– 5.4.1 Multiple-Access Interference
– 5.4.2 Mutlipath– 5.4.3 RAKE Receiver
– 5.4.4 Fading Channels– 5.4.5 Summary of the Benefits of DS-SS
Contents
CH05-4
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• 5.5 Code Synchronization
• 5.6 Channel Estimation
• 5.7 Power Control: The Near-Far Problem
• 5.8 FEC Coding and CDMA
• 5.9 Multiuser Detection
• 5.10 CDMA in a Cellular Environment
• 5.11 Frequency-Hopped Spread Spectrum
– 5.11.1 Complex Baseband Representation of FH-SS
– 5.11.2 Slow-Frequency Hopping
– 5.11.3 Fast-Frequency Hopping
– 5.11.4 Processing Gain
Contents
CH05-5
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.1 Introduction
CH05-6
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• CDMA
– Multiple-access technique, individual terminals use spread-spectrum and occupy all spectrum when they transmit.
• Spread spectrum
– Direct sequencing (DS)
– Frequency hopping (FH)
2
CH05-7
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.2 Direct-Sequence Modulation
CH05-8
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• 5.2.1 The Spreading Equation
• 5.2.2 Matched-Filter Receiver
• 5.2.3 Performance with Interference
CH05-9
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.2 Direct-Sequence Modulation
5.2.1 The Spreading Equation
CH05-10
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• BPSK signal
• Symbol-shaping function
• For rectangular pulse shape, transmit spectrum is given by
• For a direct-sequence signal, the symbol-shaping function is
which is called spreading factor
( ) ( ) Tt tgEbts b ≤≤= 0~ (5.2)
( )otherwise
TtTtg
≤≤
=
0
0'
1(5.3)
( ) ( )fTcTfSg
2sin= (5.4)
( ) ( ) ( )∑=
−=Q
q
cc qTtgqctg1
(5.5)
CH05-11
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• For DS modulation, the pulse shape is a sequence of shorter rectangular pulses called chips, the function of chip shape is
( )otherwise
TtTtg
c
c
≤≤
=
0
0'
1(5.6)
CH05-12
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.2.2 Matched-Filter Receiver
5.2 Direct-Sequence Modulation
3
CH05-13
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Received signal
• Optimum receiver corresponds to the processing
• Optimum processing
( ) ( ) ( )twtstx ~~~ += (5.7)
( ) ( )dttstxy
T
∗
∫= ~~
0
(5.8)
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
η+=
+=
=
∫ ∫
∫
∗
∗
b
T T
b
T
Eb
dttgtwdttgEb
dttgtxy
0 0
2
0
~
~
(5.9)
CH05-14
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• The mean of the noise sample ηis zero and the variance is given by
• In AWGN, the transmission performance of DS spread
spectrum is identical to the nonspread system.
• The signal-to-noise ratio with optimum detection is
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )∫ ∫ ∫
∫ ∫∫
==−=
=
=
∗
∗∗∗
T T T
T TT
NdttgNdtdssgtgstN
dtdssgtgswtwEdttgtwE
0 0 0
0
2
00
0 0
2
0
2 ~~~
δ
ση
(5.10)
[ ]( )0
2
2
N
EyESNR b==
ησ(5.11)
CH05-15
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.2.3 Performance with Interference
5.2 Direct-Sequence Modulation
CH05-16
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• DS modulation advantage: reduced receiver sensitivity to interference.
• To explain this, complex envelope is
• Received signal, including interferer, is given by
• Jamming term
( ) tfje
T
At ξπξξ
2~ −= (5.13)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )twttstx ~~~~ ++= ξ (5.14)
( ) ( )∫∗=
T
dttgty0
~ξξ
(5.15)
CH05-17
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• After multiplication by de-spreading sequence, the jamming tone becomes
• The corresponding spectrum is give by
• To estimate the contribution of jammer to the noise after demodulation, we assume:– The frequency offset is small– The noise bandwidth of the integrate and dump circuit is 1/T
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) Tt eqTtgqcT
A
qTtgqceT
A
tgeT
Atgt
Q
q
tfj
cc
Q
q
cc
tfj
tfj
≤≤−=
−=
=
∑
∑
=
−∗
=
∗−
∗−∗
0
~
1
2
1
2
2
ξ
ξ
ξ
πξ
πξ
πξξ
(5.16)
( ) ( )( )
( )( )c
cg
TffcQ
A
TffcQ
TQ
T
AfS
ξξ
ξξ
ξ
+=
+××=
2
2
2
sin
sin
(5.17)
CH05-18
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Equivalent noise contribution of jamming is given by the frequency-
domain equation
• In nonspread system, the interference power after the integrate-and-dump circuit is
• In a DS-SS system, the interference is reduced by the processing gain PG relative to its effect in a nonspread system.
( ) ( )
TP
A
TQ
A
dffSfS
G
pg
ξ
ξ
ξξσ
≈
×≈
= ∫∞
∞−
1
2
(5.18)
( )( ) ( )
T
A
dffStffcA px
ξ
ξξσ
≈
+= ∫∞
∞−
22sin
(5.19)
4
CH05-19
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.3 Spreading Codes
CH05-20
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• With TDMA, the users are time orthogonal, with FDMA, the users
are approximately frequency orthogonal, with CDMA, the users areapproximately code orthogonal
• To achieve this orthogonality, a different symbol-shaping function is assigned to each user k
• The approximate orthogonality of gj(t) and gk(t) for different time
offsetsτcan be expressed as
• Additional self-orthogonality requirement that minimizes a number of practical channel and receiver effects is
( ) ( ) ( ) Tt0 qTtgqctgQ
q
cckk≤≤−=∑
=1
(5.20)
( ) ( ) ( ) kj for dttgtgR kjjk ≠≈+= ∫∞
∞−
∗ 0ττ (5.21)
( ) 00 >≈ ττ for Rkk(5.22)
CH05-21
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
CH05-22
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.3 Spreading Codes
5.3.1 Walsh-Hadamard sequences
CH05-23
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• To construct a Walsh-Hadamard sequence, we begin with
sequences of length 2
• A four orthogonal sequences of length 4 from the sequences of
length 2
• In general, we may construct 2n orthogonal sequences of length 2n
from sequences of length 2n-1 by operation
−=
11
111
H(5.25)
−=
−−
−−
11
11
nn
nn
nHH
HHH (5.27)
−−
−−
−−=
−=
1111
1111
1111
1111
11
11
2HH
HHH (5.26)
CH05-24
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.3.2 Orthogonal Variable Spreading
Factors (OVSF)
5.3 Spreading Codes
5
CH05-25
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
CH05-26
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Suppose we need OVSF codes of length n1 and n2, with n1 < n2. The algorithm for constructing OVSF codes is
1. Construct Hn1 by the usual Walsh-Hadamard algorithm.
2. Choose one row of the matrix Hn1 as the code of length 2n
1. Let H'n1
represent the Hadamard matrix with the selected row removed.
3. Continue the Walsh-Hadamard algorithm with H'n1; that is,
4. Then continue until the desired H'n2is constructed
5. Choose any row of H'n2as the spreading code of length 2
n2
6. If a third code is needed, continue in a similar manner
−=+ ''
''
'
1
11
11
1
nn
nn
nHH
HHH (5.29)
CH05-27
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.3.3 Maximal-Length Sequences
5.3 Spreading Codes
CH05-28
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Sequences having properties similar to random sequences but can be generated simply at both the transmitter and receiver.
• Can be generated by Shift register
• Maximal-length sequences have five important properties:
1. Length property: Each maximal length sequence is of length 2m-1.
2. Balance property: Each maximal length sequence has 2m-1ones and 2m-1-1 zeros.
3. Shift property:
1. The modulo-2 sum of an m-sequence and any circular-shifted version of itself produces another circular-shifted version of itself.
4. Subsequence property: Each maximal sequence contains a subsequence of 1,2,3,…,m-1 zeros and ones.
5. Autocorrelation property.
CH05-29
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Define the circular autocorrelation function
• Normalized autocorrelation
• Each maximal-length sequence provides 2m-1 approximately
orthogonal sequences obtained by different (circular) time shifts of the original sequence.
• Given the irreducible polynomial
A shift register for m-sequence can be constructed
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )QkqcqcQ
kRQ
q
jj mod1 1
0
+= ∑−
=
(5.30)
( )
≠−
=
=0k
Q
0k
kR jj1
1
(5.31)
011
2
2
1
1 =+++++ −−
−− xcxcxcx
m
m
m
m
mK (5.32)
CH05-30
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
6
CH05-31
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.3.4 Scramblers
5.3 Spreading Codes
CH05-32
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Prevent transmission of long strings of zeros and ones that may appear in raw data.
• Long strings of 0 and 1 cause
– difficulties for circuits tracking
– Peaks in transmit spectrum �excessive
interference.
CH05-33
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
CH05-34
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.3.5 Gold Codes
5.3 Spreading Codes
CH05-35
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Gold codes are created by summing the output of the two m-sequence generators to produce a new 0-1 sequence.
• The cross-correlation of the Gold codes is approximately bounded by
• For select pairs of maximal-length sequences, we can generate 2m-1 distinct gold codes
( ) kj QQ
R jk ≠+≤21
τ (5.33)
CH05-36
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
7
CH05-37
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.3.6 Random Sequences
5.3 Spreading Codes
CH05-38
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• For random sequences, we define cross-correlation of two sequence as
• The autocorrelation function of random sequence is given by
• If we compute the cross-correlation properties, we can get
( )
= ∑
=+
Q
q
kqqxy yxQ
EkR1
1 (5.34)
( ) k all for kRxy 0= (5.36)
( )
[ ] [ ]
[ ]
==
≠=×=
=
=
∑
∑
∑
=
=+
=+
Q
q
q
Q
q
kqq
Q
q
kqqxx
0k xEQ
1
0k xExEQ
yxQ
EkR
1
2
1
1
1
0001
1
(5.35)
CH05-39
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• The average cross-correlation energy of 2 random sequences is give by
• The interference power between two random sequences is inversely proportional to the length of the sequence.
[ ]
Q
Q
yxQ
yxyxQ
E
yxQ
ERE
Q
m
Q
m
mm
Q
q
Q
m
mmqq
Q
q
qqxy
1
111
1
1
1
12
1
22
2
1 12
2
1
2
=
×=
=
=
=
∑
∑
∑∑
∑
=
=
= =
=
(5.37)
CH05-40
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.4 The advantages of CDMA for Wireless
CH05-41
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Effect on multiple-access performance when spreading codes are not perfectly orthogonal.
• 5.4.1 Multiple-Access Interference
• 5.4.2 Multipath Channels
• 5.4.3 RAKE Receiver
• 5.5.5 Fading Channels
• 5.4.5 Summary of Benefits of DS-SS
CH05-42
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.4.1 Multiple-Access Interference
5.4 The advantages of CDMA for Wireless
8
CH05-43
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Received complex baseband signal of synchronous CDMA
• The individual transmitted signals reflect their respective data and spreading waveforms, given by
• The output is given by
( ) ( ) ( ) Tt0 twtstxK
k
kk ≤≤+=∑=1
~~~ α (5.38)
( ) ( )tgEbts kbkk =~ (5.39)
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
Tt0 RbEEb
dtsgsgEbEb
dttgtxy
K
k
kkkbb
K
k
T
kbkkb
T
≤≤++=
++=
=
∑
∑ ∫
∫
=
=
∗
∗
2
1111
2 0
1111
0
1~
αηα
αηα
(5.40)
CH05-44
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Average amplitude at correlator output is given by
• The variance of output is
[ ] [ ]
b
b
K
k
kkkbb
Eb
Eb
RbEEEEbyE
11
11
0
1111
00
α
α
αηα
=
++=
++= ∑
=
(5.41)
[ ][ ]
[ ] [ ]
( ) [ ]
∑
∑∑
∑∑
∑∑
=
= =
∗∗
= =
∗∗∗
==
∗
+=
−+=
++=
+
+=
−=
K
k
kkb
K
k
K
l
lklkb
K
k
K
l
lklklkb
K
k
kkkb
K
k
kkkb
REEN
RREkEN
RREbbEEN
RbERbEE
yEYE
2
2
1
2
0
2 2
110
2 2
110
2
2
1
2
11
2
1
22
1
0
Re2
α
δαα
αα
ααηη
σ γ
(5.42)
CH05-45
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• From Eq.(5.37), we can have
• Contribution of multiple-access term to the noise variance
given by
• The transmitters are power controlled, which means
• 1st and 2nd order statistics of MAI contribution to noise
[ ]Q
RE jk
12
≈ (5.43)
∑=
≈K
k
kbMAIQ
E2
22 1ασ (5.44)
k all for k
1=α (5.45)
[ ]b
2
MAIbMAI EQ
K and EbyE
1011
−==−= σαµ (5.46)
CH05-46
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Signal-to-interference-pulse-noise ratio
• Degradation
[ ]( )
gb
b
b
b
b
Y
DN
E
N
E
Q
KN
E
EQ
KN
E
yESINR
0
0
0
0
2
2
11
1
1
=
−+
=
−+
=
=σ
(5.47)
1
0
11
−
−+=
N
E
Q
KD b
g
(5.48)
CH05-47
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.4 The advantages of CDMA for Wireless
5.4.2 Mutlipath
CH05-48
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Complex envelope of channel impulse response is given by
• Define windowed channel spectrum by
• By Nyquist smapling theorem, the time domain equivalent of
HR(f) can be represented by {hn}
( )∑=
−=L
l
ll tth1
)(~
τδα (5.49)
( )( )
<
=otherwise
Rf fHfH c
R0
2/ (5.50)
( ) ( )( )∑∞
−∞=
−=n
ccnw RntRchth sin (5.51)
9
CH05-49
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• With Rc=1/Tc, the chip rate, by the convolutional sampling theorem, the received signal is
( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )∑
∑
=
∞
−∞=
+−=
+−=
+⊗=
'
0
~
~
)(~)(~)(~~
L
l
cl
l
cl
wmp
twlTtsh
twlTtsh
twtsthtx
(5.52)
CH05-50
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.4.3 RAKE Receiver
5.4 The advantages of CDMA for Wireless
CH05-51
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Operating in multipath environments.
• The output of each delay element is processed by a single-
user receiver.
• This receiver has (L+1) fingers and gets the name “RAKE”from its resemblance to common garden rake.
• The output of ith finger
( ) ( )
( )
( )∑
∫∑
∫ ∑ ∫
∫
≠
∗
−
−=
−
− =
−
−
∗∗
−
−
∗
+−+≈
++−=
+++−=
+=
il
igglbbi
icc
iTT
iT
L
ol
l
iTT
iT
L
l
iTT
iT
cccl
iTT
iT
ci
ilRhEbEbh
dttgiTlTtsh
dttgiTtwdttgiTlTtsh
dttgiTtxy
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
η
η)()(~
)()(~)(~
~
0(5.53)
CH05-52
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• If the delay spread of channel is much less than the symbol
period T, then
• Contribution of self-interference to total noise for the first
finger is
• If spread code has cross-correlation properties similar to
random codes, then we can approximate result
( )( ) ( ) ( )∫ −≈−− ∗T
ggc ilRdttgTiltg0
(5.54)
( )∑=
+=L
l
cgglbY lTRhEN1
22
0
2σ (5.55)
( )∑ ∑≠ ≠
≈jl jl
lcggl hQ
lTRh222 1
(5.56)
CH05-53
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• The final estimate of data is given by weighted sum of output of each finger of RAKE receiver
which is called maximal-ratio combining (MRC)
• The resulting output signal-to-noise ratio is
∑ ∑
∑
= =
=
+≈
=
L
l
L
l
lllb
L
i
ii
hbhE
yhy
0 0
*2
1
*
η
(5.57)
[ ]( )
0
0
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
2
2
N
hE
hN
hEyE
SNR
L
l
lb
L
l
l
L
l
lb
Y
∑
∑
∑
=
=
=
=
==σ
(5.58)
CH05-54
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.4.4 Fading Channels
5.4 The advantages of CDMA for Wireless
10
CH05-55
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Assumption: Transmission systems are usually designed such that channel is approximately constant, at least over the duration of a symbol interval.
• Therefore, the fading performance of single-user spread spectrum BPSK or QPSK is same as non-spread case.
• For the transmission of coherent BPSK over a single-ray Rayleigh-fading transmission path, BER performance is
• BPSK performance is given by
• With second-order diversity, there is an approximate squaring of the bit error rate
04
1
NEP
b
e ≈ (5.59)
L
b
eNEL
LP
−≈
04
112(5.60)
CH05-56
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
CH05-57
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.4.5 Summary of the Benefits of DS-
SS
5.4 The advantages of CDMA for Wireless
CH05-58
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
Important features in a multiple-access system
1. Spectral density of transmitted signal is reduced by factor equal to processing gain.
2. Effect of interference by processing gain.
3. Under ideal conditions, there is no difference in BER performance between spread and non-spread forms of BPSK or QPSK.
4. In multipath channels, if it is treated as interference, its effect can be reduced by processing gain.
5. Multipath can improve receiver performance by capturing the energy in paths having different transmission delays.
6. In fading channels, spread-spectrum receiver can obtain important advantage in diversity by using RAKE receiver.
7. Choice of spreading codes is critical to reduce multiple-access interference and multipath self-interference.
CH05-59
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.5 Code Synchronization
CH05-60
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
11
CH05-61
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Assume spreading code is transmitted repeatedly
• Complex baseband receieved signal prior to chip filters
• Output of sampling device
• Partial correlation
( ) ( )
( ) ( )2TtT eTtgE
Tt0 etgEtx
cfkTj
b
ftj
b
<≤−=
≤≤=
+∆
+∆
φπ
φπ
2
2)(~(5.61)
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )φπ
φπ
+∆
+∆
=
=
c
c
fkTj
b
fkTj
cbc
eQkcE
eTkTgEkTx
2
2
mod
mod~
(5.62)
( ) ( ) ( )( )( )
( ) ( )( )( ) ( )
( ) ( )( )( )∑
∑
∑
∆+
=
∆+
=
+∆
∆+
=
−+≈
−+=
−+=
kk
kk
j
b
kk
kk
fkTj
b
kk
kk
cx
QkkmcQkceE
eQkkmcQkcE
QkkmckTxkC
c
1
1
1
1
1
1
modmod
modmod
mod
10
*'
2
10
*
10
*
1
φ
φπ (5.63)
CH05-62
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Ideally the vale if Cx(k1) should be
• To increase the confidenceof synchronization, we form a decision variable
∆
=otherwise 0
align sequencesthe if keEkC
j
b
ix
'
)(
φ
(5.64)
( )∑=
=1
1
2L
l
lx kCD (5.65)
CH05-63
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.6 Channel Estimation
CH05-64
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• In flat-fading channel, a frequency shift will be happened there the
• amplitude and phase of the received signal can be changed.
• The mobile channel effects on phase, frequency and amplitude are slowly time-varying.
• It is critical at receiver performance to have an accurate channel estimation and tracking strategy to tack these variations.
CH05-65
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
CH05-66
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Channel-tracking algorithm– Reliable data estimates, which involves transmitting
training sequence to adapt the channel estimates initially.
– Bandwidth of low-pass filter must be chosen
appropriately.
– If data stream is channel encoded to operate at a lower
SNR, reliability of the uncoded data at the output of
RAKE receiver is liable to be poor at all times.
12
CH05-67
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.7 Power Control: The Near-Far Problem
CH05-68
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• The complex baseband received signal is
• SINR of 1st user is
( ) ( )twtstxK
k
kkc~~)(~
1
+=∑=
α (5.67)
[ ]( )
( )
−
−+
==
−
−+
=
+
=
=
∑
∑
∑
=
=
=
K
k
kb
ggb
K
k
kb
b
K
k
kb
b
Y
KN
E
Q
K
DwhereDN
E
KN
E
Q
KN
E
EQ
N
E
yESINR
2
2
10
2
1
',
0
2
1
2
2
10
2
10
2
1
2
2
0
2
1
2
2
1
111
1
1
111
1
1
α
ααα
α
αα
α
α
α
σ
(5.68)
CH05-69
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Comparing the definition of with definition of , we can see
– The received energy for the desired signal is instead of Eb.
– Difference is that the denominator of included the factor, multiplier applied to the multiple-access interference.
( )∑=
−
K
k
k
K 2
2
11
1
α
α(5.70)
'gD gD
21 bEα
'gD
CH05-70
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Near-far problem: If any of the signal strengths is a greater than the
desired signal(αk>>α1), the multiple-access interference will be
increased.
• Solution for near-far problem: Power control.
• Implementation issues of power control:
– Latency
• Power must be measured at the receiver and then relayed to
the transmitter to adjust the transmit power.
– Accuracy
• Minimal averaging of potentially very noisy signal.
CH05-71
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
CH05-72
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.8 FEC Coding and CDMA
13
CH05-73
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Forward error correction (FEC) coding increases the bandwidth by a factor of 2 to 3, but includes redundancy.
• Decompose the maximum spreading rate into two parts
• If each FEC-encoded bit is spread by factor Qs, we can write Eq. (5.48) as
• This is the general expression for the degradation due to multiple-access interference when coding is present and unchanged from the uncoded expression.
• However, since the operating Eb/N0 is much lower in coded situation, there is significant improvement in overall performance.
rQQ s
1×=
1
0
1
0
1
0
11
11
11
−−−
−+=
−+=
−+=
N
E
Q
K
rN
E
rQ
K
N
E
Q
KD bbs
s
g(5.72)
CH05-74
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• The equation is the general expression for the degradation due to multiple-access interference when coding is present and unchanged from the uncodedexpression.
• Since the operating Eb/N0 is much lower in coded situation, there is significant improvement in overall performance
• FEC coding often provides a form of time tiversity
CH05-75
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.9 Multiuser Detection
CH05-76
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
CH05-77
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Matched-filter outputs can undergo further processing in the form of
multiuser detection so that the multiple-access interference can be
reduced.
• In synchronous CDMA, an equivalent baseband discrete-time model
for the system over one symbol period is
• For matrix R is the cross-correlation matrix of symbol-shaping waveforms of different users, ijth element of R and the vector of
correlated Gaussian noise samples with element is
[ ]
==≤≤+=
K
T
Kbbb
α
α
α
η
L
MMM
L
L
K
00
00
00
and ,,b whereTt0 2
1
21AARby (5.73,74)
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )∫ ∫∗∗ ==
T T
ijiij dttwtgdttgtgR0 0
i
~ and η (5.75,76)
CH05-78
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Multiuser detection algorithm is to perform the equivalent of interference cancellation
• Method 1:
– Conventional receiver: estimates each user’s bits on basis of sign of individual elements.
• Method 2
– Optimum (maximum-likelihood) detector
• Method 3
– de-correlating detector
{ }ysign=b̂ (5.77)
2minargˆ ARbyb −= b
(5.78)
{ }ysign 1ˆ −= Rb (5.80)
14
CH05-79
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.10 CDMA in a Cellular Environment
CH05-80
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Interference caused by another CDMA signal appears to be
approximately equivalent to additive Gaussian noise.
• Multiple-access interference is directly proportional to channel loading.
• Define intracellular interference as
• Intercellular or other-cell interference is the second type of
interference.
• Define relative other-cell interference factor as
bb EQ
KE
Q
KI ≈
−=
1intracell
(5.81)
intracell
cellother
I
If −= (5.82)
CH05-81
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
CH05-82
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Ping Pong effect:
– With the mobile terminal switching back and forth between two base stations as the strength of the signal varies at the boundary between two cells.
• The size of relative other-cell interference factor depends on
1. Propagation-loss exponent:
• the larger the propagation loss exponent is, the quicker adjacent-cell interference will be attenuated.
2. Variations in signal strength due to shadowing: • the larger the variation due to shadowing, the greater the
potential is to cause problems.
CH05-83
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• 3. The handoff technique between cells:
– Hard handover: • the case where communications are terminated
with one base station immediately upon acquisition of 2nd base station.
• This will result a ping-pong effect.– Soft handover:
• mobile terminal maintains communications with both base stations until one of them becomes significantly stronger than the other.
• This can prevent ping-pong effect.
CH05-84
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Total interference density
• Signal-to-interference-plus-noise at individual receiver
• Cellular CDMA system are often interference limited.
• Substitute Eq.(5.83) into Eq. (5.84), we get
( ) b
cellotherintracell
EQ
Kf
III
+≈
+= −
1
0
(5.83)
+
=
+=
0
00
00
1I
NI
E
IN
ESINR
b
b
(5.84)
( )
++
=
0
011
1
I
N
Q
Kf
SINR (5.85)
15
CH05-85
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
CH05-86
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Refer to Figure 5.26
– For a constant SINR moving from a noise-limited system to an interference-limited system increases the permissible channel loading.
– For a constant SINR, increasing other-cell interference significantly reduces the permissible channel loading.
– Reducing the SINR required by the receiver can significantly improve the permissible channel loading.
• Cell sectorization:
– Installation of directional antennas as opposed to omnidirectional antennas to improve system capacity
CH05-87
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.11 Frequency-Hopped Spread Spectrum
CH05-88
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Advantages of FH-SS
– High tolerance of narrowband interference.
– Relatively straightforward interference avoidance.
– Current technology-hopped bandwidths on the order of several gigahertz.
• Disadvantages of FH-SS
– Noncoherent detection
– Higher probability of detection
CH05-89
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.11.1 Complex Baseband
Representation of FH-SS
5.11 Frequency-Hopped Spread Spectrum
CH05-90
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• As DS-SS, complex baseband signal can be expressed as
• For linear modulation, the data modulation is
• For frequency-hopped systems, M-ary FSK will be used, in which case we have
• Hop period is the period when the transmit frequency is constant.
• When hop period larger than the symbol time, multiple data symbols transmitted on each hop, this is called slow-frequency hopping.
( ) ( ) ( ) Tt0 tjtmts kk ≤≤+= θπζ2exp~ (5.86)
( ) Tt0 tgEbtm s ≤≤=)( (5.87)
( ) ( ) Tt0 tfjEtm is ≤≤= π2exp (5.88)
16
CH05-91
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Chip refers to the tone of shortest duration.
• For slow-frequency-hopped system, chip rate = symbol rate.
• For fast-frequency-hopped system, chip rate = hopping rate.
• The tone (signal) which produced by combination of pseudonoise
(PN) code generator output and MFSK modulator output is
( ) ( ) ( )( )( ){ }
( )( )( ){ } Tt0 wheretffjE
tfjtmEts
kckis
kcks
≤≤+++=
++=
φζπ
φζπ
2expRe
2expRe
(5.90)
{ }hsc RRR ,max= (5.89)
CH05-92
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
CH05-93
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.11.2 Slow-Frequency Hopping
5.11 Frequency-Hopped Spread Spectrum
CH05-94
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
{ } jk MRsjk ≠≈−ζζmin
CH05-95
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.11.3 Fast-Frequency Hopping
5.11 Frequency-Hopped Spread Spectrum
CH05-96
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Same symbol is transmitted on multiple hops.
• For combining the outputs from multiple hops, two algorithms are:
– Majority logic detector
• Hard decision on symbol is made every hope
• Outs of different hops are combined by choosing the
symbol that appears the most often.
– Noncoherent combining
• Soft measure related to likelihood is used for combining outputs.
• It related to signal energy in a given frequency bin.
17
CH05-97
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
5.11.4 Processing Gain
5.11 Frequency-Hopped Spread Spectrum
CH05-98
Modern Wireless CommunicationsModern Wireless Communications
• Jammer: intentional interferer
• If jammer spreads its power in interference over the whole spread
bandwidth, the resulting interference density is J0=J/Wss
• Received signal-to-noise ratio
• Processing gain
s
ssG
R
WP = (5.94)
=
=
=
S
ss
ss
s
S
R
W
J
C
WJ
RC
J
ESNR
0
(5.93)