MODERN COSMOLOGY LECTURE FYTN08 - Lunds...
Transcript of MODERN COSMOLOGY LECTURE FYTN08 - Lunds...
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
1/37
MODERN COSMOLOGY LECTURE FYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Lund University
http://www.thep.lu.se/∼bijnens
Cosmology Lecture — FYTN08 —Updated 2020
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
2/37
Overview
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
3/37
Overview
1 Overview
2 Some problems with a simple expanding universe
3 Inflation
4 Epochs
5 Distance ladder, expansion
6 CMB
7 Acoustic peaks
8 Dark matter
9 Hubble constant
Credit many pictures: ESA, NASA, WMAP, Planck, Scientific American
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
4/37
Problems I: Flatness problem
Rewrite Friedman-Lemaıtre equation as
3H2
8π= − 3k2
8πR2+ ρ H =
R
R
k = 0 or flat defines critical density ρc ≡ 3H2
8π
measure all components of ρ in units of ρc : Ωi = ρiρc
Time evolution
k
R(t)2= H(t)2 (Ω(t)− 1)
e.g. Matterdominated (Ω(t)− 1) ∝ kt2/3
Ω ≈ 1 does not stay there
Flatness problem: close to 1 now, really close to 1 in earlyuniverse
For cosmological constant dominated:R(t) ∝ eαt =⇒ (Ω(t)− 1) ∝ e−2αt
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
4/37
Problems I: Flatness problem
Rewrite Friedman-Lemaıtre equation as
3H2
8π= − 3k2
8πR2+ ρ H =
R
R
k = 0 or flat defines critical density ρc ≡ 3H2
8π
measure all components of ρ in units of ρc : Ωi = ρiρc
Time evolution
k
R(t)2= H(t)2 (Ω(t)− 1)
e.g. Matterdominated (Ω(t)− 1) ∝ kt2/3
Ω ≈ 1 does not stay there
Flatness problem: close to 1 now, really close to 1 in earlyuniverse
For cosmological constant dominated:R(t) ∝ eαt =⇒ (Ω(t)− 1) ∝ e−2αt
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
5/37
Problems II
We see the universe as the same from all directions
Not all these spots have had time to talk to each other
Homogeneity problem
Many phase transitions possible
Create defects: vortices (cosmic strings), domain walls,. . .
All of these contain large amounts of energy
None seen, so either no phase transitions or they have hadtime to align
Monopole problem
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
5/37
Problems II
We see the universe as the same from all directions
Not all these spots have had time to talk to each other
Homogeneity problem
Many phase transitions possible
Create defects: vortices (cosmic strings), domain walls,. . .
All of these contain large amounts of energy
None seen, so either no phase transitions or they have hadtime to align
Monopole problem
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
6/37
Problems III
The early universe was very smooth
Where does the observed structure come from?
Much structure seen: galaxies, voids, sheets, the greatwall,. . .
How are these formed?
Structure formation problem
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
7/37
Inflation
At some point very early in the universe we had a perioddominated by Λ
This is not the present Λ or dark energy
Blow up a small region that had fully homogeneized toenormous size
Solves homogeneity problemSolves monopole problem (for earlier first order phasetransitions)
That bit also gets really flat
Solves flatness problem
During the blowup: quantum fluctuations get very big,become real
Possible seeds of structure
Can solve structure problem
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
8/37
Inflation
credit NASA/IPAC
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
9/37
Epochs
Matter ρM ∝ R−3, radiation ρR ∝ R−4
In addition all momenta were bigger earlier sinceλ ∝ 1
p ∝ R(t)
Early universe dominated by radiation
Present: Matter+cosmological constant (dark energy)
t ≈ 300000 years or T ≈ 1eV : decoupling/recombination
Accident: becomes radiation dominated at about the sametime
t ≈ a few minutes or T ≈ 1 MeV: Primordialnucleosynthesis (BBN)
Much earlier T >> 100 GeV: Inflation
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
10/37
Distance ladder
Main problem in cosmology: Measuring distances
Distance ladder:
Parallax: triangulation
easy in principletake base: Earth orbitmain problem: how accurate to measure the anglesNote old debate: if earth moves around sun,why don’t the stars move?Now dominated by satellite: Hipparchos, Hubble, Gaia
Redshift distance: simply take the redshift as a measure ofdistance
Luminosity distance
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
11/37
Distance ladder
Luminosity distance
Flux (in flat space) goes like 1/d2
Know Luminosity at source, measure luminosity at earth⇒ know the distanceSmall correction: if curvature take into account (exampleall the light emitted in a sphere surface from Southpolearrives at Northpole)
Essentially start close by and then work further out
Cepheid variables: period ⇒ Luminosity
. . .
Supernovae Ia: Luminosity decay period ⇒ Luminosity
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
12/37
Expansion
Nobel Prize 2011
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
13/37
Three main satellites
COBE: up 1989-1992 Final data 1996
WMAP : up 2001-2010 Final data 2012
Planck: up 2009-2013: Final data released: 2018
Also many ground based measurements, galaxy surveys,. . .
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
14/37
Perfect black body radiation
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
15/37
Perfect black body radiation
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
16/37
CMB: homogeneity/isotropy
This is data, not a uniform pictureNote: CMB discovered 1960s, Nobel Prize 1978 Penzias Wilson
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
17/37
CMB: homogeneity/isotropy
So v ≈ 600 km/sOriginally discovered in 1970s
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
18/37
CMB: homogeneity/isotropy
Nobel Prize 2006 Mather Smoot
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
19/37
CMB: homogeneity/isotropy
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
20/37
WMAP/Planck
More frequencies (COBE 3, WMAP 5, Planck 9)
Much better angular resolution
Much better sensitivity
Polarization
Note: all-sky pictures have a fit of the foreground removedand a simualated spectrum across the galaxy
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
21/37
WMAP 5 year
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
22/37
Planck Nine months
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
23/37
Planck 2 years
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
24/37
Angular spectrum of fluctuations
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
25/37
WMAP 5 year
Plot temperature or intensity as a function of I (θ, φ)
I (θ, φ) =∑lm
ClmYml (θ, φ)
For each l average the power over m: Cl
So we have an angular measure and fluctuations
Ground based ones add at high l
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
26/37
Planck Two years
Note: SEVEN peaks now visible
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
27/37
Everyone
2 100 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
ℓ
102
103
104
D ℓ[µK2 ]
Planck
WMAP9
ACT
SPT
Can fit to nine peaks
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
28/37
The source of the fluctuations
Small quantum fluctuations do exist
Inflation blows them up so they cannot disappear again
Expected power spectrum Ps = As
(k
k0
)ns
Tensor spectrum can come from priomordial gravitational
waves Pt = At
(k
k0
)nt
Inflation predics ns ≈ 1 (scale invariant) and usually alittle below 1.
So then inflation stops, what now?
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
29/37
Growing and oscillating
Very long wavelength: frozen in, no time to interact
As soon as within horizon (i.e. time to interact)Fluctuations grow: denser spots grow denser, rarer spotsgrow rarer (gravity is attractive)
Then however: universe is dominated by radiation: weknow the photon gas
If too dense, pressure counteracts the compression bygravity, like sound waves (hence acoustic oscillations)
Matter reacts much slower and in first hand only normalmatter reacts with the photons
So height first peak depends on photon density, we knowthat one, so get information on total matter and from thedifferent sizes first second peak also on baryonic matter
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
30/37
How big is the first peak
We know the real size of the first peak plus the age, so theangle of view tells us flat, open (hyperbolical) or closed(spherical) from the shape of the triangles
If neutrinos had mass: streaming kills of those peaks soupper limit on neutrino mass.
CMB fluctuations should hook on to those measured fromgalaxy distributions (surveys)
Number of neutrinos: how many radiation species: affectsrate of expansion also visible
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
31/37
Parameters
1− Ω −0.0008± 0.0040ΩΛ 0.6911±0.0062
Ωbh2 0.02230± 0.00014
Ωch2 0.1188± 0.0010
H0 67.74± 0.46 km/s/Mpch 0.6774± 0.0046
Age 13.799± 0.021 Gyrns 0.9667± 0.0040∑ν mν < 0.194 eVw −1.006± 0.045
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
32/37
Universe content (WMAP)
No Big Bang
1 20 1 2 3
expands forever
−1
0
1
2
3
2
3
closed
Supernovae
CMB
Clusters
SNe: Knop et al. (2003)CMB: Spergel et al. (2003)Clusters: Allen et al. (2002)
ΩΛ
ΩM
open
flat
recollapses eventually
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
33/37
Universe content (WMAP)
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
34/37
Dark matter
Galaxy rotation curves: flat???
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
35/37
Dark matter
Globular clusters: also more matter needed than visible tobound them
Seen in essentially all galaxies
Clusters of galaxies
Dark matter needed for galaxy formation
Weigh galaxies by gravitational lensing: see directly darkmatter
Colliding galaxies: dust interacts strongly, starsless, darkmatter even less
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
36/37
Dark matter
Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/M.Markevitch et al. Optical: NASA/STScI; Magellan/U.Arizona/D.Clowe et al.
Lensing Map: NASA/STScI; ESO WFI; Magellan/U.Arizona/D.Clowe et al.
ModernCosmologyFYTN08
Johan Bijnens
Overview
Problems
Inflation
Epochs
Distanceladder,expansion
CMB
Acousticpeaks
Dark matter
Hubbleconstant
37/37
Hubble constant
Lensed quasars: 73.3+1.7−1.8 km/s/Mpc
Cepheid/supernova Ia: 74.0± 1.4 km/s/Mpc
CMB (dominated by Planck): 67.4± 0.5 km/s/Mpc
CMB is at z ≈ 1000
Others are at z ∼ a few
Systematic errors, Λ varies with time,. . .