Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

download Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

of 17

Transcript of Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    1/17

    MIXED FARMING FOR SUSTAINABLE

    LIVELIHOOD OF SMALL FARMERS IN INDIA

    Dr. Narayan G. Hegde

    BAIF Development Research Foundation, Pune

    With about 35 to 40% of the population living in poverty, livelihood security for the rural

    poor continues to be a cause of concern in India. Indian economy is heavily dependent on

    agriculture even today because about 65% of the population is living in rural areas and over

    0% of them are dependent on agriculture and allied activities for their livelihood. !ut of the

    total "#$.## million land holders in the country, 64.% are marginal holders ho on less

    than " ha and ".5% families are small farmers oning beteen " and # ha. &ore than 50%

    of these families are located in arid and semi'arid regions, here the rainfall is scanty and

    erratic. (hese farmers have been groing drought tolerant food crops, mostly millets and

    pulses ith very lo investment in improved seeds, fertilisers and plant protection measures,

    resulting in poor yields and lo returns. )ragmented land holdings, heavy depletion of soil

    productivity, inefficient use of ater resources, out'dated agricultural production

    technologies, unavailability of agricultural credit and lac* of infrastructure for post harvest

    management and mar*eting of agricultural produce, are the other factors hich further

    suppress their agricultural production. +nfortunately, these regions have also been neglected

    by the scientific and business communities in introducing ne technologies, high yielding

    varieties hich are resistant to drought and developing necessary infrastructure as ell as

    support services to boost agricultural production and value addition. ue to lo agricultural

    productivity, these small and marginal farmers as ell as about "5 to "% landless families

    living in rural areas, are unable to generate remunerative employment and about 40% families

    are forced to live in poverty.

    )or these small holders and landless, livestoc* has been a source of supplementary income.

    -oever, over 5% of the animals are uneconomical due to severe genetic erosion,

    inade/uate feeding and poor veterinary care. With loer crop and livestoc* productivity, the

    employment opportunities in the farming and other related sectors are reduced further,

    leading to reduction in farm ages, seasonal employment, malnutrition and migration.

    #0"3. Invited 1aper. International 2onference on Increasing gricultural 1roductivity and ustainability inIndia (he )uture We Want7organised by 8ational Institute of dvanced tudies 98I:, in collaboration ith

    &.. aminathan )oundation, 2hennai, Indian Institute of cience 2ampus, ;angalore.

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    2/17

    With lac* of food security, poor families are compelled to migrate to cities in distress,

    *eeping their agricultural lands fallo. uch barren lands accelerate soil erosion, run off of

    rain ater, resulting in floods, siltation of ater bodies and loss of biodiversity and thereby

    contributing to global arming. In the absence of efficient soil and ater conservation, there

    ill be a severe reduction in the ground ater table, accelerating the process of denudation of

    the eco'system and shortage of drin*ing ater. istress migration ill also deprive the

    omen and children of their basic needs such as shelter, safe drin*ing ater and health care,

    hich ill affect their /uality of life. (he children ill discontinue their education and end

    up as child labour and illiterate unemployed youth of the future. (hus, improving the

    agricultural productivity of small land holders can play a *ey role in ensuring food security

    and improving the /uality of life in the country.

    Indian Green Revol!ion "or Food Se#ri!y

    =ealising the urgency of enhancing food production, the >overnment of India had launched

    the >reen =evolution programme in the si?ties, through introduction of high yielding

    varieties and coordination among organisations engaged in agricultural development.

    lthough >reen =evolution as successful only in 1un@ab, -aryana and parts of +ttar

    1radesh and =a@asthan, this small region could ensure food security for the entire nation.

    (heir ma@or focus as on development of infrastructure for bac*ard and forard lin*ages

    for cultivating high yielding varieties of paddy, heat, maiAe crops and oil seed crops to

    some e?tent. s a result of >reen =evolution, the food grain production increased from #

    million tons in "$60 to "6.4 million tons in "$$0 and to #4".56 million tons in #0"0. (he

    positive impacts of >reen =evolution continued till the "$$0Bs. ubse/uently, there as a

    decline in the groth of agricultural production, from "0 ' "#% during the pea* of the >reen

    =evolution to #.3% during the (enth 1lan 1eriod 9>ovt. of India, #0"":. 2ultivation of high

    yielding varieties demanded higher doses of chemical fertilisers, pesticides, more diesel and

    electrical poer to pump ater for irrigation. (he cost of these three inputs contributed to

    "5% of the total cost of inputs in "$0, hich increased to 55% in "$$4 and to over 0% in

    #005. Increasing use of these inputs as no more economical and in the absence of neer

    technologies, the groth in agricultural production reduced drastically to less than #%, hich

    had an adverse effect on the purchasing poer of the poor, due to reduction in employment

    opportunities and drop in age rates. &ost of the other regions hich have not benefitted

    from >reen =evolution, continue to suffer from lo crop yields, resulting in unemployment,

    insecure livelihood and poverty, even today.

    2

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    3/17

    S!ra!egy "or Develo$%en! o" Rain "ed Area&

    While the regions e?periencing stagnation in agricultural production after 3 ' 4 decades of

    >reen =evolution, re/uire a special pac*age, hich includes scientific crop rotation, efficient

    ater use and increased use of organic nutrients, the problem of lo productivity in other

    areas hich are dependent on rainfall for agricultural production, needs to be addressed ith

    an innovative approach to enable the marginal and small farmers to sustain their livelihood.

    ome of the important recommendations for rain'fed areas are effective soil and ater

    conservation through atershed development, increased use of organic nutrients, introduction

    of drought tolerant and short duration crops, efficient use of available ater resources

    through micro'irrigation and mulching, timely tillage operations to conserve moisture and

    control eeds, development of astelands through tree'based farming and introduction ofappropriate farm tools to improve the efficiency of labour. Inspite of the above measures, it

    ill be e?tremely difficult for the marginal farmers to depend only on crop production for

    their livelihood and hence, livestoc* can ma*e significant contribution to bring them out of

    poverty.

    mall and marginal farmers as ell as the landless have been traditionally maintaining

    different species of livestoc* as a reliable source of income and cash reserve in times of

    emergency. -oever, in the absence of superior /uality germplasm and lac* of technical

    support to improve the productivity of livestoc*, most of them have been generating meagre

    income from livestoc*. +nable to cope up ith their needs, these farmers try to increase their

    herd siAe, hile causing pressure on fodder and feed resources and contributing to green

    house gases.

    (herefore, the challenge is to address the problems of marginal farmers by improving the

    productivity of rain'fed agriculture and livestoc* oned by them, to enable them to enhancetheir income, hile conserving the denuding natural resources and the environment. uch a

    model of promoting livestoc* development ith agriculture, *non as mi?ed farming, has

    several advantages such as efficient use of byproducts li*e crop residues as animal feed and

    dung as manure, fodder trees gron on field bunds as ind brea*s as ell as source of

    fodder, bulloc*s for tillage operations and efficient use of spare time to manage both the

    activities, ithout any demand for labour from outside. (o ensure the success of mi?ed

    farming, it is necessary to improve the productivity of the livestoc* and develop a sustainable

    land use plan depending on the soil productivity and domestic needs. s animal husbandry

    3

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    4/17

    demands a large /uantity of fodder, lo productive land can be profitably used for fodder

    production ith very remote chances of failure. (he programme should also include the

    development of efficient value chains, hich ill include small farmers as the *ey

    sta*eholders.

    Live&!o#' in Rral E#ono%y

    nimal -usbandry is the main source of livelihood for small farmers ho are deprived of

    fertile land and assured source of irrigation. s per the census of #00, out of 5# million

    heads of livestoc* in India, there ere "$$ million cattle, "05 million buffaloes, "4" million

    goats, # million sheep and "" million pigs. 2attle represented over 3% of the livestoc*

    population. While farmers having access to fodder resources, prefer cattle and buffaloes, the

    landless prefer to maintain sheep, goat and poultry. India ran*s first in cattle and buffalo

    population, second in goat, third in sheep and seventh in poultry 9(able":. lthough the

    population of livestoc* during the last "0 years has been stable in the range of 45 million,

    the buffalo population has increased by .$"%, hile the cattle population has reduced by

    6.$%. (here has been a significant increase in the population of goats during the last five

    decades, hich is attributed to the decrease in the siAe of land holdings and persistent drought

    caused by erratic monsoon, forcing many small farmers to shift from large animals to small

    ruminants.

    Ta(le )* Live&!o#' +o$la!ion in India

    Sr. No. S$e#ie& Live&!o#' ,en&& Gro-! Ra!e /01

    )223 4556 4556 over )223

    ". 2attle "$.$ "5.# '6.$

    #. ;uffalo $.$ $.$ .$"

    3. heep 5.5 6".5 6.$6

    4. >oat "##. "#4.4 ".35. !ther nimals "6.34 "6.05 '".

    To!al Live&!o#' 789.7 789.5 :5.58

    ource Civestoc* 2ensus, epartment of nimal -usbandry D airying, &inistry of

    griculture.

    2attle and buffaloes are the ma@or species maintained by all sections of the community and

    unli*e other natural resources, they are ell distributed among small and large land holders.

    (hey are ideal for mi?ed farming because of their valuable contribution to human nutrition

    9mil* and butter fat:, plant nutrition 9farmyard manure: and energy 9bulloc* poer:. (he

    4

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    5/17

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    6/17

    Ta(le 4* I%$or!an! Indian Breed& o" ,a!!le

    Breed& Na%e&

    Mil# Breed&*verage mil* production

    above "500 *gElactation

    >ir, ahial, =ed indhi, (harpar*ar

    Dal:$r$o&e Breed& *

    i. verage productivity breeds verage

    mil* production beteen "000'"500

    *gElactation

    ii. Co productivity breeds verage mil*

    production less than "000 *gElactation

    -aryana, Gan*re@, =athi, &inari,

    !ngole and angi

    &eati and eoni

    Drag!:+r$o&e Breed& verage mil*

    production less than 500 *gElactation

    8agor, ;achaur, &alvi, -alli*ar,

    mritmahal, Ghillar, ;argur, 1anar,

    iri, >aolao, Grishna Halley, Gan*atha,

    Gherigarh and Ghangayam

    ource non. "$$.

    +er"or%an#e o" Dairy ,a!!le

    In spite of achieving the highest mil* production in the orld, the performance of our cattle

    has been e?tremely poor. It can be observed from (able 3 that the average mil* yield of

    cattle in India is far belo the yield in other countries. 8o doubt, the average mil* yield of

    cattle has increased by "00% over #5 years, beteen "$65 and "$$3, but it is still less than

    #5% of the yield in Furope.

    Ta(le 6* ;ield o" Mil'ing ,o-& in di""eren! ,on!rie&

    ,on!ry Average ;ield /):>9 )226

    sia 5"# ""#5

    India 4# $

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    7/17

    above yield of indigenous cattle does not include the yield of draft breeds and nondescript

    cos hich are hardly mil*ed due to lo yields. -oever, they compete for fodder and

    feed, resulting in huge shortage of feed resources. (he future challenge is to cope up ith the

    groing demand for mil* ithout increasing the livestoc* population, amidst the shortage of

    fodder and feed resources.

    Ta(le 7* E?$e#!ed Gro-! o" Live&!o#' +o$la!ion and Mil' ;ield

    Year 455>:53 454):44

    Ty$e o"

    Ani%al&

    +o$la!ion

    /%ill.1

    +rod#!ion

    /%ill. !on&1

    @e!

    Average

    /'g=day1

    +o$la!ion

    /%ill.1

    +rod#!ion

    /%ill. !on&1

    @e!

    Average

    /'g=day1

    Indigenous #."5 #0.#63 ".$ 3".#64 #6.#4 #.#

    2rossbred #.50 ".6# 6.5 "#.34 44.03 .$

    ;uffalo 3#.64 53.$6 4.50 40.06" $.$ 5.$4

    >oat '' 4.03 '' '' 6.5"# ''

    ,on&erva!ion o" Vani&ing Indian Breed&

    mong 30 ma@or Indian breeds of cattle, as shon in (able #, there are only four milch

    breeds, hich are under severe neglect. (here are a fe dual'purpose breeds and the rest are

    draft breeds. With the modernisation in agriculture, bulloc* poer is losing its importance.

    !n the other hand, small farmers cannot ma*e optimum use of bulloc*s and hence, prefer to

    hire tractor services, henever necessary. (hus, ith the diminishing demand for bulloc*

    poer, the farmers are not ade/uately motivated to conserve these draft breeds. In the

    absence of a clear policy and programme for conservation, these breeds are sub@ect to heavy

    genetic erosion.

    =ealising the groing population of lo productive non'descript cattle population, the

    >overnment of India promoted the Intensive 2attle evelopment 1rogramme ay bac* in the

    60Bs to upgrade them through crossbreeding ith e?otic mil* breeds such as

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    8/17

    from the present /uantity of ""0 million tons to "5 million tons by #0##, dairy farmers are

    assured of remunerative price for their produce.

    +ro(le%& o" !e +oor Dairy Far%er&

    )or involvement of poor dairy farmers in successful dairy husbandry programme, it is

    necessary to address their problems, hich are presented belo

    1oor /uality animals re/uiring genetic upgradation

    1oor access to breeding and health care services

    8utritional deficiency due to shortage of feed and fodder

    Ignorance about Aoonotic diseases such as ;rucellosis, (;, etc.

    Cac* of technical guidance to adopt good husbandry practices

    Inefficient mil* collection and mar*eting

    1oor lin*age ith research institutions

    +navailability of credit facilities.

    +re&en! S!a!& o" Ani%al H&(andry Servi#e&

    elivery of animal husbandry and veterinary services free of cost to farmers, has been

    accepted as the responsibility of the tate >overnments, since independence. (hese services

    included breeding of cattle and buffaloes through I, preventive vaccinations, treatment of

    sic* animals and e?tension services to promote ne technologies. -oever, in the absence

    of greater mobility, most of the services ere confined to the periphery of the veterinary

    clinics established at the bloc* level. With the shortage of /ualified veterinary graduates,

    most of these technical services ere gradually assigned to semi's*illed livestoc*

    supervisors. In the absence of efficient services, farmers in interior areas could not ta*e

    advantage of the programmes, to improve the productivity of their livestoc*. Infrastructure

    for mar*eting of mil* has been very ea*, due to poor performance of the cooperatives.

    (hus, the progress of livestoc* development, particularly dairy husbandry, could benefit a

    small population in selected regions, here mil* cooperatives ere efficient, hile a large

    section of small farmers could not ta*e advantage. In case of dairy husbandry, lin*age of the

    dairy farmers ith the processing unit is very critical.

    vailability of fodder and feed can play a very important role as about 0% of the cost of

    dairy husbandry is on feed. (here are several hurdles for the small farmers to procure good

    8

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    9/17

    /uality feed at a competitive price. While there is a severe shortage of animal feeds, farmers

    in fodder surplus areas are even burning crop residues or selling for alternate uses at

    substantially loer prices. In the absence of organised supply, the local traders ta*e undue

    advantage by supplying inferior /uality feed at high cost. In such a situation, dairy farming

    can become uneconomical in spite of superior technical inputs. -ence, the above problems

    need to be addressed, for transforming dairy husbandry into an important source of livelihood

    for small farmers.

    S!ra!egy "or Develo$%en! o" ,a!!le and B""aloe& "or Dairy H&(andry

    2onsidering the re/uirements of small dairy farmers, the folloing activities need to be

    initiated to boost livestoc* production.

    ). Gene!i# I%$rove%en!

    ).). +rod#!ion o" S$erior ali!y Bll&

    )or genetic improvement, the first step is to produce superior /uality bull mothers

    and bull calves.

    )armers maintaining elite herds of cattle and buffalo can also be involved in bull

    calf production through planned breeding and buy'bac* guarantee.

    pplication of uper !vulation and Fmbryo (ransfer technology for production

    of superior bull mothers and bull calves.

    1rogeny testing of sires should be underta*en to select sires having ability to

    transmit superior genetic traits.

    ).4. +rod#!ion o" S$erior ali!y Se%en

    emen freeAing laboratories should be certified for /uality and disease free status

    &inimum genetic and health standards should be prescribed for bulls to be used

    for semen collection.

    ).6. ,on&erva!ion o" Gene!i# Re&or#e&

    Important native breeds of cattle and buffaloes should be conserved through the folloing

    activities

    9

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    10/17

    tudy on economics and utility of different breeds

    Incentive for maintaining elite animals of native breeds

    Fstablishment of bull mother farms by procuring elite females from field

    +se of se?ed embryos for multiplication of elite progeny

    4. Breeding Servi#e& and Manage%en!

    4.). Training and Regla!ion o" AI Te#ni#ian&*

    *ill oriented training for paravets to improve breeding efficiency

    =egular monitoring of the services of 1aravets and vets to maintain high

    technical standards, ithout e?ploiting farmers

    1eriodic training of 1aravets and farmers on good animal husbandry practices.

    4.4. S$$or! Servi#e&

    (imely supply of inputs such as li/uid nitrogen, froAen semen, vaccines, first

    aid *it, feed concentrates, mineral mi?ture and forage seeds to the paravets for

    onard supply to dairy farmers, through local airy )ederation or 8>!

    engaged in livestoc* husbandry.

    4.6. Heal! ,are

    1rivatisation of health care services, through )armersB )ederations

    upport for private veterinary practice in close association ith paravets

    Fstablishment of isease Investigation laboratories by the airy )ederation or

    private agencies for effective treatment of animals

    trengthening of =esearch and evelopment facilities for disease diagnosis,

    production of effective vaccines and control of critical diseases

    =egulatory role of tate nimal -usbandry epartments in disease surveillance

    and promotion of clean mil* production.

    4.7. S!ra!egy "or Feed Manage%en!

    10

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    11/17

    E""i#ien! Manage%en! o" ,ro$ Re&ide&* 1romote ne food crop varieties having

    higher grain yield ith stal*s of superior fodder /uality. 1lant breeders and

    agronomists should be sensitised to breed and promote dual'purpose varieties of

    sorghum, maiAe, ba@ra, and a ide range of legumes.

    I%$rove%en! o" N!ri!ional Vale&* 1resently, the ma@or /uantity of dry matter is

    contributed by paddy stras, heat stra, maiAe stal*, sugarcane bagasse and trash,

    hich are of poor nutritional value, due to high fibre content. With ne techni/ues,

    the /uality of such fodder should be improved. (his ill also help in augmenting the

    fodder shortage.

    Develo$%en! o" ,o%%ni!y @a&!eland&* Ffforts should be made to develop

    pasture lands involving local communities through soil and ater conservation,

    introduction of improved legumes and grasses, forage tree species and prevention of

    graAing.

    In#rea&e in Forage ;ield&* 1resently, improved practices are not folloed for

    cultivating forage crops. -ence, efforts are needed to breed superior fodder

    varieties, produce and supply good /uality seeds, promote use of soil amendments,

    biofertilisers and forage harvesting e/uipment.

    ,o%$le!e Feed Ra!ion&* (o overcome nutritional imbalance in the field and to

    facilitate small farmers and landless to maintain their livestoc* under balanced

    feeding, decentralised complete feed production units can be established.

    Fodder Ban'&* Fstablishment of fodder ban*s in fodder scarcity regions through

    airy )ederations and 1eopleBs !rganisations can help small farmers to feed their

    livestoc* during scarcity. In paddy and heat groing areas here the stra is

    asted, facilities for compacting stra can be installed and arrangements can be

    made to collect and pac* them. )odder ban*s can play a critical role in timely

    supply of feed to livestoc* oners during the years of drought. (he fodder ban*s

    can also ta*e up the production of complete feed for local distribution.

    In!rod#!ion o" (y:$a&& +ro!ein Feed* (echni/ues have been developed to avoid

    astage of nutrients by feeding by'pass protein and fat. upport should be provided

    11

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    12/17

    to establish by'pass proteinEfat production units particularly in mil* sheds here

    high /uality milch animals are maintained.

    Red#!ion o" Herd Sie* It is necessary to create aareness among farmers to

    reduce herd siAe and ensure optimum feeding instead of maintaining a large number

    of underfed animals.

    S$$or! "or S%all Far%er&* )or calf rearing, feed subsidy, insurance coverage,

    venture capital, etc. may be given to ensure their active role in dairy development

    and in rearing of small ruminants.

    4.9. Nodal Agen#ie& "or Ba#'-ard and For-ard Lin'age&

    (he responsibility of providing bac*'up services to paravets and veterinarians

    can be assigned to mil* processing units, dairy federations, voluntary

    organisations or private entrepreneurs in the region.

    (hese nodal agencies can also ta*e up the production of critical inputs such as

    froAen semen, cattle feed, forage seeds, etc. re/uired by the farmers.

    (here is a need to develop a value chain, by establishing coordination among all

    the sta*eholders to enable them to play an efficient and transparent role for

    improving the production and profit margins of the farmers.

    4.>. Manage%en! o" ,lled Ani%al&

    1resently, small farmers are not able to get rid of unproductive or sic* animals

    suffering from contagious diseases. uch unanted animals not only put

    pressure on feed resources, but also spread diseases. (herefore, suitablearrangements should be made for disposal of the culled animals by ay of

    establishingpanjarpolesthrough voluntary organisations or any other means.

    F?port of animals to neighbouring countries desiring to procure, can be

    permitted and coordinated through the nodal agency E -.

    6. +ro#e&&ing and Mar'e!ing o" +rod#e

    12

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    13/17

    &ini dairies should be established in small tons here large dairies are not

    viable. (his ill ensure transparency and efficiency.

    &il* processing units should assume a prominent role in airy Halue 2hain

    management by promoting breeding services, input supply and health care

    provision, apart from collection of mil*. (he farmers should be trained in clean

    mil* production.

    Develo$%en! o" O!er S$e#ie& o" Live&!o#'

    heep, goats, pigs and fishery also have the potential to provide gainful employment in

    selected areas. )or instance, piggery is an e?cellent source of livelihood in the 8orth'Fastern

    states. family ith 6' pigs can be assured of food security. )amilies maintaining ' "0

    goats can come out of poverty, ithin a period of " ' #4 months. imilarly, a floc* of 40 '

    60 birds of indigenous poultry breeds can contribute to the income substantially.

    Innova!ive A$$roa# o" BAIF

    ;I) has been a leader in ta*ing up dairy husbandry as a poerful tool for generating gainful

    employment in =ural India. ;I)Bs strategy has been to use the non'descript unproductive

    local cos and buffaloes ith superior /uality e?otic germplasm to produce high yieldingcrossbred cos. ;I) adopted froAen semen technology to ensure the use of elite germplasm

    at the doorsteps of farmers. Fngagement of school drop outs for providing breeding, each

    covering "500 to #000 families and other essential services, not only provided employment to

    the local youth but also helped them to closely interact ith illiterate dairy farmers and assist

    them in adoption of good management practices. (his innovative model as recognised by

    the >overnment of India in "$$, enabling ;I) to establish 2attle evelopment 2entres

    across the country ith the support of I=1 Infrastructural )und of the >overnment of India

    and to e?pand the programme through 4000 centres across "6 states covering over 40 la*h

    families in 60,000 villages. (he programme covers breeding of cattle and buffaloes,

    promotion of fodder cultivation, minor veterinary care such as deorming and vaccination

    and mobilisation of farmers to develop their organisations to collect mil* and supply to the

    local dairies.

    (his programme turned out to be successful as farmers ith lo yielding nondescript

    animals, ere able to produce high yielding cos and buffaloes ithout any capital

    13

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    14/17

    investment. With the increasing demand for mil* and higher price realisation, farmers

    maintaining 3 cos ere able to earn =s. 40,000 ' 45,000 per year and come out of

    poverty. uch high yielding cos and buffaloes produced at the doorsteps of the farmers,

    today, fetch over =s.40,000 to =s.60,000 and truly serve as security to tide over financial

    crisis. (here is no other programme herein the poor have an opportunity to build such high

    value assets ithout any ris* or capital investment. 1resently, the mil* produced by the

    farmers participating in ;I) programme, contributes to over =s. 4000 crores to the national

    >1 every year.

    ;I) has also initiated an eco'friendly >oat evelopment 1rogramme herein 6 ' goat

    *eeping omen form a group to maintain a superior /uality breeding buc* to ensure genetic

    improvement, hile a trained local paravet mentors 6 such groups and provides critical

    services such as deorming, vaccination, castration, guidance on fodder production and

    feeding, periodic monitoring of groth and lin*ages ith the mar*et. s a result of these

    interventions, the goat *eepers are no able to enhance their income by #50 ' 300%, due to

    prolific *idding, high eight of *ids at birth and at various stages of groth, lo mortality

    and better price realisation. =igorous culling to restrict the herd siAe depending on fodder

    availability and promotion of stall feeding to avoid biotic pressure on the eco'system, are

    helpful to *eep this programme eco'friendly. (he impact of this programme on livelihood

    and attitude of the goat *eepers can be observed in " #4 months. ;I) is presently

    operating this programme in the states of =a@asthan, &aharashtra,

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    15/17

    E%i&&ion o" Me!ane

    (he global methane production in "$ as in the range of 400 ' 600 million tons per annum

    of hich livestoc* contributed about #%, amounting to 0 million tonsEannum. When the

    feed reaches the rumen, it is converted into short chain fatty acids, microbial biomass and

    fermentative gases, mainly carbon dio?ide and methane, through microbial degradation,

    *non as enteric fermentation. (he proportion of these components produced in rumen

    varies to a great e?tent, ith the type of feed and microbes 9;lummel, et al #00":. (he

    variation in digested outputs occurs due to the type of feed, level of inta*e, retention time in

    rumen and type of microbes present. !n an average, each adult co emits about "5 ' #0 *g

    methane in a year. With about "00 million livestoc*, + emits 5.5 million tons of

    methaneEyear. India has 45 million livestoc* and these are li*ely to release proportionately

    higher /uantity of methane due to consumption of inferior /uality fibrous fodder.

    S#o$e "or Red#ing Me!ane +rod#!ion

    epending on different species of microbes, nutrients and other chemical substances present

    in the feed, the degree of fermentation ill vary and the volume of gases released, ill also

    change. (hus, there is scope for reducing the production of gases by proper manipulation of

    these factors.

    Balan#ed Feeding* Ffficiency of microbe has a significant impact on production of various

    products, particularly gases. While the short chain fatty acids provide 0 ' 5% of energy

    re/uirement, microbial biomass provide 0 ' "00% amino acid re/uirements of ruminants.

    With proper feed selection, supplementation and balancing of various ingredients, it is

    possible to ma?imise the conversion of feed into microbial biomass and short chain amino

    acids, hile reducing green house gases. With high protein diet, formation of gases can bereduced significantly, hile high fibre content in diet can increase the production of gases.

    (hese gases are released in the atmosphere through digestive and respiratory systems.

    I%$roving Feed ali!y* ma@ority of the livestoc* in India is lo productive. (hey are

    under'nourished and survive on open graAing or on poor /uality, high fibre roughages. (hese

    animals release more methane than high yielding animals, ho consume better /uality feed.

    (o reduce the ill'effects of poor /uality feed, brea*ing of lignin in roughages before feedingto livestoc* through various methods should be e?plored. team treatment of sugarcane

    15

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    16/17

    bagasse and paddy stra and urea ' molasses treatment of paddy stra are some good

    e?amples. 2onversion of high fibre grasses into silage may be easy and beneficial. Fven

    simple chopping of fodder before feeding livestoc*, can reduce methane production by '

    "0%.

    Good Heal! ,ondi!ion&* nimals suffering from diseases also release higher volume of

    methane compared to healthy animals. s most of the farmers are unaare of the threat

    posed by their livestoc* to the environment, no efforts are being made either to reduce the

    herd siAe or to control methane emission. (hese animals further demand fodder, feed and

    ater, thereby creating pressure on the natural resources hich are already scarce 9-egde,

    #0"0:.

    E""i#ien#y o" Mi#ro(e&*It is presumed that there are a ide range of microbes involved in

    degeneration of biomass. (he efficiency of different species and strains is li*ely to vary

    idely. (hus, there is scope to identify various species and their strains of micro'organisms

    present in rumen hich are efficient convertors of feed into amino acids and microbial

    biomass. uch microbes found even outside the rumen, can be introduced into the rumen to

    improve digestion in ruminants.

    Me!ane a(&or(ing Mi#ro(e&* (here are also microbes hich have the capacity to absorb

    methane and convert it into other products. uch selected micro'organisms capable of

    feeding on methane, can also be incorporated in the rumen flora for reducing the emission of

    methane hile improving the productivity and profitability of livestoc* husbandry.

    Me!ane Tra$&* &ost of the lo productive livestoc* generally go out for graAing during

    the day and return to the shed in the evening. (hey release significant volume of methane

    and carbon dio?ide during the night hen housed in a cattle shed. (rapping these gases

    inside the barn by fi?ing efficient filters, may be possible by using modern technologies.

    Dng Manage%en!* nimal dung and urine also release methane and nitrous o?ide.

    &ethane is generally released through anaerobic decomposition, hen dung is heaped as

    manure for a longer period. In countries li*e India, farmers have been folloing the practice

    of dumping dung in manure pits for 3 ' 6 months for better decomposition, thereby

    contributing substantially to emission of methane. ;etter management of farmyard manureand compost pits can also reduce emission of methane in the atmosphere to a great e?tent.

    16

  • 8/12/2019 Mixed Farming for Sustainable Livelihood of Small Farmers

    17/17

    +se of dung for production of biogas is the best option to convert this threat into an

    opportunity. (he old models of biogas plants ere inconvenient to manage in congested

    residential areas. 8e compact models have no been developed hich are ready for ider

    replication.

    ,on!rol o" Live&!o#' +o$la!ion* (he aim should be to reduce livestoc* by improving the

    productivity of the animals, so that ith small number of livestoc*, farmers can earn higher

    income. (his can happen by producing genetically superior /uality animals and maintaining

    them ell ith balanced feeding.

    Re"eren#e&

    ". non. "$$6. 8ational Civestoc* 1olicy 1erspectives =eport of teering >roup.

    1lanning 2ommission, >overnment of India.

    #. non. #005. nnual =eport #004'#005. epartment of nimal -usbandry and

    airying, &inistry of griculture, >overnment of India. 8e elhi.

    3. >overnment of India, #0"". )aster, ustainable and &ore Inclusive >roth n

    pproach to the JII )ive Kear 1lan, 1lanning 2ommission, 8e elhi.

    4. non. "$$. airy India Kearboo* HI. 8e elhi.

    5. ;lummel, &., Grishna, 8. and !rs*ov, F.=. #00". upplementation strategies for

    optimiAing ruminal carbon and nitrogen utlisation 2oncepts and approaches.

    1roceedings of the "0thnimal 8utrition 2onference Garnal, India. =evie 1apers,

    8ovember $'"" "0'#3.

    6. -egde, 8.>. #0"0. &itigating >lobal Warming hile providing ustainable

    Civelihood through Integrated )arming ystems F?periences of ;I). International

    2onference on >lobal Warming griculture, ustainable evelopment and 1ublic

    Ceadership. hmedabad, India. &ar ""'"3 "6 pp.

    17