MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY · 2016-06-12 · feasibility study report alternative water...

FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT

ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY INVESTIGATION

Long Prairie, Minnesota

MINNESOTAPOLLUTIONCONTROL AGENCY

BRUCE A. LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.CONSUltING HVCKKXOGISTS

POOf ESSKDNAl GtCXO&STS

3131 Fernoook Lone. MN 5S441 • 612-6S9-1473

EPA Region 5 Records Ctr.

**5»,

APR 1 81985 ^

MINN. POLLUTIONCONTROL AGENOfi

LARSON• PETERSON <fe ASSOCIATES. ItJC.MUNICIPAL CHCIMCCN9

228830

FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT


LONG PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA

Prepared For

MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY

Prepared By

BRUCE A. LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.3131 FERNBROOK LANEPLYMOUTH, MN 55441

(612) 559-1423

And

LARSON-PETERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC,522 W. MAIN STREET - BOX 150DETROIT LAKES, MN 56501

(218) 847-5606

This report ws prepared by meor under my direct supervision: April 15, 1985

- / /.

Kenneth P. OlsonHydrogeologistBruce A. Liesch Associates, Inc.

TABLE OF•4

Introduction 1-3

Geologic Conditions 4-7

Hydrologic Conditions 8-11

Area Domestic and Irrigation Ground Water Use 12 - 15

Mobility of Organic Contaminants 16 - 20

Area Organic Contaminant Concentration Maps 21 - 25

Task 8 - Rating of Alternatives 26 - 38

- Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater 26 - 34

- Well No. 6 Installation 35 - 37

- Hook - Up to Irrigation Wells 38

- Redevelopment of Well No. 1 38

Task 9 - Recommendations 39 - 43

- Proposed Recommendation 39 - 43

- Proposed Cost for Recommendation 43

- Project Cost for Recommendation if Well 6 isShown to be Suitable 43

Bibliography

Appendix

- Appendix A - MGS Well Logs/DNR AppropriationsPermit Information

ILLUSTRATIONS

-t

Figure

1 Location Map 2

2 Geologic Block Diagram 5

3 Monitoring Well/Production Well Location Map 6

4 Regional Groundwater Gradient Map 9

5 Water Table Contour Map 10

6 Domestic Well Location Map - Contaminated Area 13

7 Domestic and Irrigation Well Location Map 15

8 Conceptual Model of Chlorohydrocarbon Migration 18

9 Hydrogeologic Cross Section through ContaminantPlume 19

10 Organic Concentrations cis-l,2-Dichloroethylene 22

11 Organic Concentrations 1,1,2-Trichloroethylene 23

12 Organic Concentrations 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethylene 24

13 Conceptual Design - Activated Carbon Treatment 40

14 Conceptual Design - Well 6 Installation 42

TABLES

Table 1 - Density and Solubility Characteristics of the ChlorinatedHydrocarbons Identified in Long Prairie, Minnesota. 16

Table 2 - Carbon Treatment Cost Chart 33

LONG PRAIRIE

TASK 9 REPORT

Introduction:

The work team of Bruce A. Liesch Associates, Inc. (BAL) and Larson-Peterson

Associates, Inc. (LPA) was retained by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

(MPCA) to conduct an Alternative Water Supply Investigation for the City of

Long Prairie. The study was commissioned by the MPCA after volatile organic

contaminants were identified in two of the five Long Prairie wells. The

Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) ordered that use of wells 4 and 5 be

discontinued owing to the high levels of organic contaminants. The MDH also

identified an advisory area where the MDH recommended that domestic ground-

water use be discontinued. The location of the contaminated area is shown on

Figure 1 - Location Map. With the loss of two production wells, the City of

Long Prairie could no longer provide the water needed to meet the peak de-

mands for the summer of 1984.

The primary objective of the study" is to develop a plan to provide water to

the City of Long Prairie to .meet the peak danands of the Summer of 1984. The

following tasks will be completed under this study:

- Review and compilation of existing data concerning area geology, hydrology

and contaminant conditions

- Review of historic municipal water demands

- Projection of water demands through at least the spring, suntner, fall and

winter of 1984 and the year 2000

- Review of capability of the existing municipal water system to

supply noneontaninated water

- Projection of potential future contaminant migration and impact ^

- Identification of potential alternatives for supply of sufficient volumes

of water during the spring and summer of 1984

bubslalion I"'T-- -y v—

1000 ?000 3000 4000 WOO

B A S E FROM U.S.G.S. Q U A D R A N G L E S

L

Bf?UCE A LIESCH ASSOCIATES. INC

ccxsm VJG«>OHS9O4M G<Cl COS'S -

MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE MAR 84

L O C A T I O N M A P

1

Review of potential alternatives including:

- effectiveness of alternative as temporary, long term, and/or permanent

solution

- feasibility of alternative

- cost of alternative/ initial and continuing

- construction schedule of alternative

- effect of alternative on contaminant plume extent or shape

Rating of potential alternatives

Recommendation of alternative with justification of recommendation, es-

timated costs, schedules, and conceptual design

Preparation of final designs, specifications, bidding documents and other

materials as directed by State

-3-

Geologic Conditions:

The glacial terrain in the Long Prairie area Is associated with at least two

separate ice sheet advances. The upland areas to the east and west of Long

Prairie are underlain with ground morainal deposits identified as the

Alexandria Moraine of the Wadena Lobe Glaciation (Hobbs fit Goebel, 1982). An

outwash plain, which was developed during the Des Moines Lobe Glaciation,

bisects the ground morainal terrain. The City of Long Prairie is located on

the relatively level surface of the outwash plain and on the lower slopes of

the moraine.

The organic contamination in the northeast portion of Long Prairie was in-

itially identified in Wells 4 and 5 and subsequently in some residential

wells which all are supplied by ground water in the shallow outwash deposits

of the Des Moines Lobe Glaciation. The geologic block diagram (Figure 2)

illustrates the configuration and relationship of the glacial units in the

outwash deposits. The contaminated segments of the outwash deposits consist

mainly of fine to medium grained silty sand and sand approximately 50 feet

thick.

Logs of wells and soil borings in the area a indicate glacial till unit below

the outwash sands at an approximate elevation of 1240 feet (NGVD). The till

unit can be identified in the soil boring logs to the east of the

contaminated areas (BAL-1, BAL-2, BAL-3) as well as in municipal well no. 5

and MPCA boring location 4 (Figure 3 - Monitoring Well/Production Well

Location Map).

To the south of the contaminated areas (south of Central Avenue) till de-

posits are encountered from a depth of approximately seven feet to a depth of

at least 43 feet. The shallow depth to the till suggest that the surface

contact between the outwash deposits and the till lies to the east and south

at slightly lighter elevations.

The test borings to the east of the contaminated area encountered sporadic

sand deposits ranging from 1 to 13 feet in thickness below the blue till unit

encountered at approximately 1240 feet (NGVD). Indications of continuity in

-4-

CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE. MINNESOTA


GEOLOGIC BLOCK DIAGRAM

LEGEND:

(D MUNICIPAL WELL

BAL-0 WATER SUPPLY TEST WELL

4 MPCA MONITORING WELL NEST

FEET

BnuCE A, U69CH ASSOClAIEi INC.

I


GEOLOGIC BLOCK DIAGRAM



% DOUC31IC

ffi UUNICIPAL WtU.

o «••' WELL

LINE OF C U T A W A Y JCCTIOM

.} BAL-2

B A L - 2 A

* MONITOA'NO WELL13)

>ii NUMBER SHALLOW WELL DEPTH

2«t4 MUMBCH: UiODLt WELL DEPTH

3td NUMBER: DEEP WELL DEPTH

THIRD AVF. N.E

FIRST AVE. N.E.

BOUC£ A.-UESCH ASSOCIATES. INC MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE

MONITORING WELL /

PRODUCTION WELL LOCATION MAP

the lower sand units is lacking. There is no information from the

contaminated areas as to the geologic condition below the till units

encountered at the elevation of 1240 feet (NGVD).

The glacial drift in the Long Prairie area is over 200 feet thick and over-

lies lower Precambrian metasediirentary rocks. The bedrock in the area does

not represent a viable water supply source for municipal or domestic well

development but rather acts as a barrier boundary to the movement of ground

water.

-7-

Hydrologic Conditions:

A review of the U.S.G.S. Hydrologic Atlas HA-380 and the topographic maps of

the area indicates that the groundwater flow direction and the location of

discharge areas are controlled by the Long Prairie River.

Mapping of the lake level elevations from the U.S.G.S. topographic sheets

(Figure 4) illustrates the apparent ground water gradients associated with

the upland areas east of Long Prairie.

Surface water runoff flows to the east and west away from a local watershed

divide just east of Long Prairie. The groundwater gradients identified

through the topographic review appear to follow the topographic expression of

the land surface with a groundwater divide located along the surface water

drainage divide.

The site specific ground water flow in the vicinity of the contaminated zone

is defined by using ground water levels measured at the two-inch diameter

water table wells installed by MPCA to monitor water quality and water

levels. The MPCA under separate contract installed 15 wells at eight

monitoring sites in the contaminated" area. Two of the sites consisted of a

three well nest with wells at the water table (10 -20 feet) , at an

intermediate level (35 feet) and at a deeper level (50 feet) . Three of the

sites consisted of a two well nest with wells at the water table and inter-

mediate positions. The remaining well sites consisted of a single water

table well. The well locations and water table contours are shown on Figure

5, Ground Water Contour Map.

The configuration of the contours suggest that Well No. 4 & 5 have developed

a trough shaped ground water sink over years of pumping that interrupted the

natural flow toward the River and caused ground water to flow into the in-

fluence of the wells from all directions. As a result, recharge td, the

aquifer to replace the water pumped from the wells may be derived from the

River as well as from regional flow toward the River and local precipitation.

The development of the sink around Wells 4 and 5 probably accounts for the

configuration of the contaminant plume as a narrow band, as shown on the

-8-

WATER TABLE CONTOUR*

^ — 10 FOOT INTERVAL

^,. —-'"" • FOOT INTERVAL

E L E V A T I O N IN FEET (NOVO)

2000

SCALE

2000 4000

FEET

MDH ADVISORY AREA

Developed by Dr. H. O. Pfannkuch

N

o1316

BRUCE A LIESCH ASSOCIATES. INC

- CONSAflNG KVOOO.OGIS1J -

L3131 Lone


REGIONAL GROUNDWATER

GRADIENT MAP 4



• MFCA UONITOHINQ WEIU3)

0 MUNICIPAL V4CIA

>••*..* WATER TABLE ELEVATION

—'... WATER TABLE CONTOUR LINE

MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE

W A T E R TABLE CONTOUR MAP

3/2 /04

The development cf the sink around Wells 4 and 5 probably accounts for the

configuration of the contaminant plume as a narrow band, as shown on the

water quality maps, rather than a broad plume"migrating toward the River.

The water table depression in the vicinity of Wells 4 and 5 is most likely~ " '*}

caused by the pumping at those wells along with the discharge from the

private residential wells. Accordingly, the cessation of pumping at Wells 4

and 5 could cause a recovery of water levels and re-establishment of the

groundwater flow direction and discharge to the Long Prairie River of greater

quantities of ground water than while the wells are in use. Other reasons

for the configuration of the contaminant plume could include geologic control

such as:

The trough could be caused by an area of higher permeable material

which focuses groundwater flow toward it.

Fine grained layers which confines groundwater flow and contaminant

migration toward the Long Prairie River.

In the event that the groundwater depression is partially or totally induced

by geologic factors then the cessation of pumping may have less of an effect

on water levels than previously discussed. With the present level of

information the actual cause of the groundwater trough and specific

groundwater flow directions cannot be determined.

-11-

Area Denes tic and Irrigation Ground Water Use:

The available water well information for the study area in Long Prairie was

compiled and reviewed to determine the water use characteristics of the City.

Information on domestic water use in the contaminated area was provided by

the MPCA. This information included the location of households not connected

to City water, well information from the well owner, and water quality in-

formation of samples collected by the MPCA. BAL reviewed the files of the

Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) and collected all geologic well logs and

well information for the area in and around Long Prairie. BAL also reviewed

the files of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to collect all

available information on the irrigation wells of the area.

Well location maps of the study area domestic wells and of the area wells

identified in the MGS and DNR files were presented in the City of Long

Prairie - Alternative Water Supply Investigation - Deliverable Set No. 1

submitted to the MPCA on February 13, 1984. The maps have been updated and

included in this report.

The Domestic Well Location Map - Contamination Area (Figure 6) shows all of

the domestic water users in and near the contaminated area that do not have

City water hook-ups. The information was provided by the MPCA with the

household locations field checked by BAL personnel on February 8, 1984.

The map separates the households into three groups: The households not at-

tached to the City system which have not been tested for organic

contamination (solid circles) , the households not attached to the system

which have been tested for organic contamination and were found to be clean

(solid triangles), and the households not attached to the City system which

have been tested for organic contamination and have been found to\ be

contaminated (open triangles). The identification numbers correspond to the

identification numbers assigned by the MPCA.

-12-

Tr--

N

0 Domestic Wells -No water quality analysis

A Domestic Wells -With water quality analysis

A Domestic Wells -With water quality analysisand ideptlfied organlcs

69 Well owner identification number

Base map from Laisen-Petei'son Assoc., Inc.

SCALE 1:4875

BRUCE A. UESCH ASSOCtAIES INC MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE

DOMESTIC WELL LOCATION MAP -CONTAMINATED AREA

MAR 84

The Domestic and Irrigation Well Location Map (Figure 7) shows the location

of the domestic and irrigation wells that are listed in the MGS and DNR files.

Well information presented on the map for the low capacity domestic wells is

limited to the well identification number and the well yield. Information on

the high capacity irrigation wells consists of the well owner, the well

identification number, the DNR appropriations permit number, and the reported

well yield. A list of the irrigation well characteristics and the Geologic

Well Logs from the MGS files are provided in Appendix A.

-14-

N

LEGEND

HIGH CAPACITY IRRIGATION HELLS

Well owner DNR permi t no.

Petron 75-3271600 gpm 132248

MGS we l l log u n i q u enumber

Recorded w e l l y i e l d

DOMESTIC HELLS

Reported well yield

125604 lOopm '

SCALE., rt-.=«=;:.

MGS well log uniquenumber

DATA BASE:- MGS well log files- DNR appropriations permit files

Base From U.S.G.S. Quadrangles

BftUCE A. UE9CH ASSOOATti INC

i

MPCA - CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE MAR 84

DOMESTIC AND IRRIGATION^ WELLLOCATION MAP

Mobility of Organic Contaminants:•4

The mobility of the organic contaminants identified in the ground water at

Long Prairie, Minnesota is dependent on many factors including the physical

and chemical characteristics of the fluid as well as the hydrogeologic con-

ditions in the study area. The fluid characteristics that can affect the

migration of contaminants include density, viscosity, solubility, surface

tension, and polarity (Schwille, 1981). The hydrogeologic condition that can

effect contaminant migration include permeability, hydraulic gradient,

hydraulic barriers, recharge boundaries and artificial alterations to the

natural flow field (ie. pumping wells, tile systems).

The most important physical characteristics of the three hydrocarbons

identified in Long Prairie are density and solubility in water.

The densities of the chlorinated hydrocarbons were abstracted fron Handbook of

Chemistry and Physics (1970). The solubilities of the hydrocarbons were

taken from Schwille (1981) and Horvath (1982).

TABLE 1

DENSITY" AND SOLUBILITY" CHARACTERISTICS

OF THE CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS IDENTIFIED IN

LONG PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA

Hydrocarbon Density at 20°C.

(g/ml)

Solubility at 10° C.

(mg/kg): (wt. %)**

cis-1.2-Dichloroethylene 1.2837

Tr ichloroethylene 1.4642

Tetrachloroethylene 1.6227

Water 1.0000

1070

160

.4000

.1061

.01488

* Schwille, 1981

** Horvath, 1982

-16-

The foregoing physical characteristics of the hydrocarbons indicate that the

hydrocarbons are heavier than water and as such should descend through a

water column. This suggests that the hydrocarbon could sink to and be re-

tained or retarded by a lower permeable bed. An illustration of this type of

flow was presented by Schwille (1981) and is reproduced as Figure 8. As the

illustration suggests, hydrocarbons sink to a lower permeability zone which

either impedes or retards any further downward migration. These conditions

lead to a situation where the heavier hydrocarbons could move down slope

along a geologic boundary, against the natural groundwater gradient.

The solubility information indicates that the solubility of the identified,it~ .H '/•

hydrocarbons ranges from approximately .1% to .8% solubility by weight. This

does not appear to indicate that the hydrocarbons are very soluble, but in a

groundwater flow field the identified concentration could easily be attained

from the dissolution of a slug of contaminant.

It is unknown at present whether any free phase hydrocarbon is still present

in the area.

The most significant unknown to the mobility of the organics in the Long

Prairie flow field is the variation in the subsurface deposits of the area.

The density contrasts between the organics and the ground water could account

for the highest concentrations of the organics observed in the intermediate

depth monitoring wells in the MPCA network. A lower permeability unit below

the intermediate depth wells (silty sand vs. sand) may represent a boundary

that alters the rate of vertical migration of the organics.

The data appear to support this concept in that the highest contaminant

levels are observed in the intermediate well depths at MPCA Sites No. 2 and 6

which are open to the sand unit which overlays a silty sand unit. The lower

organic levels observed in the intermediate well at MPCA Site No. 4 may be

caused by the location of the well, which is finished in the silty sand and

is not open to the overlying sand deposits. Figure 9 shows a cross section

through the MPCA multiple Well nests No. 2, 4 and 6 and municipal Wells No. 4 and

5. As the illustration shows, the highest concentration of

-17-

Ground surface

CMC phase

Unsaturated zone

•• •.X---^- ( j

. .1 ^CHC dissolved• • • • .in waterSaturated

Impermeable

Fig. 4. Chlorohydrocarbon migration pattern

DIAGRAM FROM SCHWILLE (1981)

L

BRUCE A LIESCH ASSOCIATES. INCVWCXO&Sli -GKXOGWS -

3131 FemOfOO* lor* • Mw>«coolll. MN


CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF

CHLOROHYDROCARBON MIGRATION 8

m\nih

TH

RO

UG

H

s io>o

GE

LO

QIC

CR

OS

S S

EC

TIO

NC

ON

TA

MIN

AN

T

PLU

ME

CD

TY

O

F L

ON

G

PR

AIR

IE

WlNEC T 2

1200

SAND

SILTY

TILL

SAN 3

LL

F WELL OR i WELLONCjENTRJmOM1 OF

YLENE IN ug/l

WELLS WELL 4

)

_!....

>

'In

«

1°'

tetrachloroethylene are observed in the wells open to the sands at an

elevation of approximately 1250 >feet. The other hydrocarbons tested also

show this same trend.

Owing to the paucity of data points in the intermediate and deeper well

positions, the theory to the migration of hydrocarbons in the Long Prairie

area is only speculation.

-20-

Area Organic Contaminant Concentration Maps-4

Tne MPCA has collected and tested numerous water samples from the domesticwells from the contaminated area in Long Prairie. The tests were used todelineate the area of contamination and to determine which domestic watersupplies were safe to use and which should not be used.

*.

Three organic constituents were present in the majority of the wells that

showed signs of contamination. . The constituents are Cis-1,

2-Dichloroethylene, Trichloroethylehe (TCE), and 1,1,2,

2-Tetrachloroethylene. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) hasdeveloped recommended limit criteria for maximum human consumption for TCE

and tetrachloroethylene. No human health criteria have been developed for

dichloroethylene owing to insufficient data.

Both TCE and tetrachloroethylene are listed as carcinogenic and thus have a

recommended zero concentration for the maximum protection of human health

(EPA, 1980). To assess the degree of risk to a population, the EPA has de-

veloped a range of risks to a population associated with certain

concentrations in water. The 10~5 risk (1 additional case of cancer in a

population of 100,000) for the identified contaminants are presented below

(Sittig, 1981).

Hydrocarbon 10~5 Risk

Dichloroethylene No criteria developed

Trichloroethylene 27 (ug/1)*Tetrachloroethylene 8 (ug/1)*

*ug/l = parts per billion

IConcentration gradient maps for the three contaminants are shown on Figures10 - 12. All show a relatively narrow band of contaminants trendingsouthwest-northeast.

-21-



OO"tS1tC WELL

MUNICIPAL WELL

OBSERVATION WELL

ORGANIC CONCENTRATION LEVEL (v«/ll

ORGANIC IDENTIFIED BELOW QUANTIFIABLE L£V£L

UPC* MOMtTOftING WELL(9)

ut MUuftCA- SHALLOW WELL W A T E R QUALITY (2nd NUMBER. MIDDLE WELL W A T C H QUALITY (

3rd NUMBER. DEEP WCL.L WMEft QUALITY lw«JI>

ORGANIC CONCENTRATION CONTOUR LINE (ug/l)

N

SCALE

FO

* *•»/

•Ji

1*

T

I/

FIFTH AVE

JATH AVE.

**

-'{

\

\HIRO

4s

t*

9

1

•

*VE

t

SECOMP AVE. ME

i rMUCt A. UtSCH ASSOClAIES INC MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE MAR 84

ORGANIC CONCENTRATIONS

Cl* 1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEr'E 10



DOMESTIC w

0 MUNICIPAL W£Ll

OBSERVATION WELL

7C ORGANIC CONCENTRATION LXVfL (•**/!)

r ORGANIC iDfNTif ico •CLOW QUANT* IAILC LIVIL

U»CA MOMTORIHO WILLIS)

111 NUUfCf) SHALLOW WttL WAlfiH OUALlTr (wp/D

2«4 NUUtCA. UtOOLl WiLL WATER OUALlTV

3rd NUMfCH. D£C» WELL WATCH DUALITY

OHOAHIC CONCENTRATION CONTOUM ItHt |«g/l>

SCALE

MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIE


1,1.2-TRICHLOnOETHYLENC



DOMESTIC WELLMUNICIPAL WELLOBSERVATION WELL

ORGANIC CONCENTRATION LEVEL (wg/lt

OAQAN1C IDENTIFIED BELOW QUANTIFIABLE LEVEL

MPCA MONITORING WELLfl)

III NUMBER.

3n4 NUMBER: MIDDLE WELL WATER QUALITY Uff/0

NUMBER: DEEP WELL WATER QUALITY (wg/l>

OAGAMIC CONCENTRATION CONTOUR LINE

200 400 600 FEET

MPCA-CITY OF LONG PRAIRIEBf*JC£ A UESCH ASSOClAfES INC


1.1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHYLENE

It appears that the organic contaminants are moving toward the ground water

depression discussed in the area hydrology section. This would suggest that

the source of the contamination is southwest of Wells No. 4 and 5. The

actual source of the contamination is unknown at present.

-25-

Task 8 Rating of Alternatives•4

BAL and LPA conducted a review of all potential alternatives to solve the

Long Prairie water supply problem under Task 5 of the contract. During this

review BAL and LPA identified all of the potential alternatives that were

technically feasible and recommended four alternatives for additional

investigation. The alternatives selected for further study were:

-Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater

-Installation of Well No. 6

-Hook-up to Existing Irrigation Wells

-Well Redevelopment

TREATMENT OF CONTAMINATED GPOONEWATER

FEASIBILITY: The feasibility of treatment of the water supply at Long

Prairie as a short term solution to contamination by chlorinated solvents

(tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene, and chloroform) is

good. Either activated carbon treatment or air stripping in packed-bed,

countercurrent columns separately, or in tandem, should provide excellent

removal of these chemicals. From influent concentrations as high as 600 ug/1

one could expect effluent quality £ 2.0 ug/1, well below drinking water

criteria of 8.0 ug/1 for tetrachloroethylene.

The treatment of contaminated ground water represents a short term solution

and not a long term solution to the problem.

SUITABILITY OF ALTERNATIVE:

Air Stripping; Air stripping does not appear to be a suitable alternative

for the treatment of the contaminated ground water in Long Prairie owing to

the unavailability of lease/rental units. Of the three vendors surveyed

during this study only one (Calgon) recommended air stripping. Calgon

indicated that the air stripping units could only be purchased and were not

available for lease.

-26-

Technically, air stripping with activated-carbon polishing is a suitable

treatment alternative. The reason that air stripping works well for these

trace organics is because they are quite volatile, with Henry's Law Constants

in the range from 0.1 - 2.0 (mg/1 air)/(mg/l water). Rates of gas transfer

of these compounds from water to air are sufficiently rapid in packed-bed

columns. Feasibility of air stripping has been demonstrated in a number of

applications including: landfill leachate, wastewater treatment plants,

aquifer reclamation, and for treatment of contaminated water supplies.

If a vendor proposed to use air stripping with activated carbon polishing

and had units available for lease/rental, then air stripping would be a

viable alternative.

Carbon Treatment: Carbon treatment represents a viable alternative to the

treatment of the contaminated ground water in Long Prairie. All of the firms

surveyed developed treatment plans and preliminary cost estimates for carbon

treatment. The systems ranged from gravity fed carbon treatment with pre-

treatnent for iron and manganese to pressurized activated carbon systems.

Granular activated carbon treatment works well for removal of trace

organics because they are rather jiydrophobic, that is, they favor a more

organic matrix (like activated carbon) than the polar water solution. While

the capacity of activated carbon adsorption for these chemicals is not large

(x/m of 0.001 - 0.010 gm chemical per gm carbon at these influent

concentrations) , it is sufficient to ensure a high quality effluent with

consistent performance. It is because of the consistent effluent produced

from activated carbon treatment that activated carbon should be considered as

the preferred treatment strategy or as a polishing unit following air strip-

ping. Activated carbon treatment has been demonstrated recently as effective

treatment methods at New Brighton, Minnesota and Denver, Colorado.

-27-

COST: Cost and proposed designs were collected from three firms specializing

in the emergency treatment of contaminated water. Each firm was provided the

same background information and requested to provide estimates of

mobilization and demobilization costs, lease/rental rates, carbon costs, and

operating costs. The background information provided to the treatment firms

is as follows:

Concentration Criteria

(ppb) (ppb)

cis-l,2-dichloroethylene 6 to 8

1,1,2-trichloroethylene 6 to 7 27

1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylene 100 to 280 8

chloroform 1 to 5 1.9

Iron concentration: 2 ppm

Manganese concentration: 0.2 ppm

Treatment volume: 300 gpm

Set-up: Must be pre-treatment plant

The proposed plans and projected costs are provided below. Each responding

firm would incur similar installation costs to hook-up their system to the

Long Prairie distribution system.

-Anticipated cost to hook-up to transmission line

from well 4 & 5 to treatment plant no. 2 $6,000.00

-Anticipated costs of electrical drops for

treatment system operation $2,000.00

$8,000.00

It is anticipated that it would take less than 1 week to provide actess

to the transmission line and the power drops.

-28-

CARBON SERVICES

The proposed system from Carbon Services consists of 2 gravity sand

filters operating at 200 gpm each followed by 2 gravity carbon filters also

operating at 200 gpm. The influent water would be aerated with a compressor

to precipitate the iron and manganese from solution. Filtration through the

gravity sand filters should bring the iron and manganese levels below the

water quality criteria of 0.3 mg/1 iron and 0.05 mg/1 manganese. Lift pumps

from the sand filters would lift the effluent into the carbon filters for

organic removal. The effluent from the carbon filter system could bypass the

water treatment plant and be pumped directly into distribution.

Maintenance of the system would consist of backwashing the sand filters

approximately every 3 days to remove the iron and manganese precipitates.

The projected costs to operate the system for 3 month and 9 month

periods are shown below.

Dnit Costs

Mobilization: Sand filter:

Carbon filter:

$3,000.00/unit/faonth

$3,000.00/unit/month

Demobilization: Sand filter:

Carbon filter:



Lease Cost: Sand filter:

Carbon filter:

$3,000.00/uni t/month

$3,000.00/unit/month

Carbon Costs $0.60/lb.

Projected Electrical Costs $25.00/day

-29-

Projected costs for 3 months of operation:

Mobilization: $12,000.00Demobilization: $8,000.00

Lease: $12,000.00

Carbon (9000 Ibs.): $5,400.00Electric Costs: $2,250.00

$39,650.00


Mobilization: $12,000.00Demobilization: $8,000.00Lease: $36,000.00Carbon (27000 Ibs.): $16,200.00Electric Costs: $6,750.00

$78,950.00

O.H. MATERIALS

The system proposed by O.H. Materials consists of 2 pressure sandfilters operating at 150 gpm each followed by 3 pressure activated carbonfilters operating at 100 gpm each. The sand filters would be operated toremove any fine materials prior to carbon treatment. With the system under

pressure, the majority of iron and manganese should stay in solution throughthe system. The effluent from the sand/carbon treatment would flow into

treatment plant no. 2 for iron and manganese removal.

Maintenance of the system would consist of backwashing the units toclean the carbon and sand filters. The frequency of backwashing required isundetermined at present.

-30-

The projected costs to operate the system for 3 month and 9 monthperiods is presented below:

Unit Costs

Mobilization-Demobilization:

Lease costs:

First 90 Days:

Following 180 Days

Carbon costs:

Electrical Costs:

$10,000.00

$800.00/day

$450.00/day

$1.00/lb.

$25.00/day


Mobilization-Demobilization:Lease:

Carbon (13500 Ibs.):

Electrical costs:

$10,000.00$72,000.00

$13,500.00

$2,250.00

$97,750.00


Mobilization-Demobilization:

Lease:

Carbon (40500 Ibs.):

Electrical Costs:

Carbon Disposal:

$10,000.00

$153,000.00

$40,500.00

$6,750.00

N/A

$210,250.00

O.K. Materials indicated that the costs presented above represent vtryconservative cost estimates and that discounts and refinements could decrease

the actual cost.

-31-

CALGON

The proposed system from Calgon consists of a single pressurized carbon

treatment unit. The unit is approximately 10-feet in diameter and 10 feet

high. With the system under pressure the majority of the iron and manganese

should stay in solution. A lift pump would feed the system with a lift equal

to the head loss through the system.

The system would need to be set on concrete footings or railroad ties. The

system does not require backwashing.

The projected costs to operate the system for three months and nine months

periods are presented below:

Unit Costs

Mobilization, set-up, supervision,

1 load carbon, 1st months lease

Teardown - Refurbishing

Lease Cost:

Carbon Costs: (1 truckload should

last 4 to 5 months @ 300 ppb

tetrachloroethylene)

Electrical Costs:

Lift Pump Rental

$31,000.00-$33,000.00

$14,000.00

$l,600.00/foonth

$21,000/truck

$10.00/day

$10.00/day

Projected Costs for Three Months of Operation:

Mobilization - 1st months lease

Lease

Lift Pump Rental

Teardown

Electrical Costs

$31,000.00-$33,000.00

$ 3,200.00

$ 900.00

$14,000.00

$ 900.00

-32-

$50,000.00-$52,000.00

Projected Costs for Nine Months of Operation:

Mobilization - 1st months leaseLease

Lift Pump Rental

Carbon

Teardown

Electrical Costs

$31,000.00-533,000.00

$12,800.00

$ 2,700.00

$21,000.00

$14,000.00

$ 2,700.00

$84,200.00-$86,200.00

These costs do not include the rental of a crane to remove treatment unit

from flatbed trailer.

TABLE 2

CARBON TREATMENT COST CHART

3 Months of Operation 9 Months of Operation

Carbon Services $39,650.00 $78,950.00

Calgon $50,000.00-$52,000.00 $84,800.00-$86,200.00

OH Materials $97,750.00 $210,250.00

PERMANENT SOLUTION: Treatment of the contaminated groundwater does notrepresent a long term solution to the water supply needs of the City.Treatment of contaminated groundwater represent a short term solution to theproblem which can provide water to the system until a new water supply sourceis established.

-33-

EFFECT ON PLUME: The continued pumping of Wells 4 and 5 would most likely

continue to draw contaminated ground water from the most highly concentrated.j

areas southwest of the wells. It is anticipated that with continued pumping

the levels of contaminants in the pumped water would increase.

SCHEDULING: All three firms specialize in the emergency treatment of

groundwater. It is anticipated that systems could be installed and operating

within two weeks of contract implementation.

-34-

WELL NO. 6 INSTALLATION *

FEASIBILITY: Well 6 could provide up to 500 gpm on a continuous basis to

water treatment plant No. 2. To meet peak demands Well No. 6 could provide

up to 660,000 gpd (assuming 22 hours of pumping per day). This represents

64% of the peak demand of 1983. The preliminary work has been completed with

regards to well location and potential yield (BAL report of 1983).

Test results from a pumping test at Well No. 3 on February 20, 1984 indicated

that at a distance of less than 1500 feet there was no drawdown influence

observed from the pumping of Well 3 at 300 gpm. This would suggest that the

operation of Well No. 6 would not cause appreciable drawdown in the area of

Wells 4 & 5 and thus could represent a suitable water supply source. The

testing of Well No. 6 following its installation could confirm this

hypothesis. The use of Well No. 6 as a new municipal water source is

dependent on MDH approval.

An analysis of pumping conditions at an assumed well at Site No. 6 was conducted

by Dr. H.O. Pfannkuch using procedures outlined by Bear (1979). The

analytical procedures identified the theoretical stagnation point of a cone

of depression down gradient from"a pumping well. Dr. Pfannkuch used

hydraulic coefficients from the 1983 BAL testing procedures at Site No. 6 and

the identified ground water gradients of the area. Dr. Pfannkuch1 s analysis

identified a radius to stagnation point of less than 1500 feet which agrees

with the testing procedures at Well #3.

At present, all indications are that Well Site No. 6 may represent a suitable

location for municipal well development.

SUITABILITY OF ALTERNATIVE: The development of additional wells in Long

Prairie represent a viable solution to the long term water needs of the ci y.

Well 6 could provide a usable water supply as long as the water quality of

the well remained above safe drinking water standards. It appears that Well

6 represents a safer water supply than that provided at Well 3 owing to the

relative distances of the wells from the contaminant plume.

-35-

COST: The following cost estimates were Developed by Larson-PetersonAssociates, Inc. and were presented in their December 1983 report titledPreliminary Engineering Report for Emergency Water System Improvements, LongPrairie, Minnesota.

Construction and testing of Well 6: $14,455.00*Pump rental for summer operation: $ 2,400.00Well pump: $ 8,000.00Well house and accessories: • $36,000.00Construction contingency: $ 2,925.00Engineering, Legal and Fiscal: $ 9,200.00*0bserve and Analyze pumping test: $ 3,000.00

$75,980.00

Transmission Line ConstructionConstruction costs: $41,037.50Engineering, Legal and Fiscal: $ 6,162.50

$47,200.00

* Costs developed by BAL

PERMANENT SOLUTION: The development of Well 6 represents a possible longterm solution to the groundwater problems of Long Prairie. Well 6 couldprovide water to the City for as long as the well remains clean. Furthertesting as part of this study will identify the potential for thecontamination of Well 6 from the identified plume. At present, Well 6 couldprovide the city with an additional water source. This water source wouldappear to be a safer supply than that provided by Well 3 as indicated by\ thedistances to the contaminant plume. Well 6 would also represent a new, cleanwell which is at least 40 years newer than Wells 1 through 3.

-36-

EFFECT ON PLUME: Unknown until further testing. Preliminary results from

the pumping test at Well No. 3 and analysis conducted by Dr. Pfannkuch sug-

gest that Well 6 should have little observable drawdown interference in the

identified area of the contaminant plume.

The ceasation of pumping at Wells 4 and 5, which would be part of this

alternative, should cause water levels in the watertable aquifer to recover to

their natural pumping condition

SCHEDULING: Well No. 6 could be drilled and developed within two weeks of

issuance of a contract. Construction of the water main to feed water plant

No. 2 could be completed in 20 working days. Construction of a pump house

could delay use of the well for up to one month. To decrease the time frame

of pumping, a submersible pump could be rented and installed for a six month

period to provide water during the peak demand season. When demand declines

a pump house could be installed with a line shaft turbine pump. It is

anticipated that within.two months of the issuance of a contract, Well 6

could be providing water to the water treatment plant No. 2. It is

anticipated that Well 6 could provide water to treatment plant 2 by July 1,

1984.

-37-

HOOK-UP TO IRRIGATION WELLS

•4

The preliminary alternative evaluation identified irrigation well owners who

were interested in discussing access agreements to their irrigation wells for

use during the surnroer of 1984. As part of the Task 7 Analysis, LPA visited

Long Prairie and field inspected the well sites and reviewed the area for

transmission line installation.

LPA concluded that above ground transmission line would be difficult to

install, maintain, and secure. With the other feasible alternatives'

available to Long Prairie, LPA concluded that the use of irrigation wells

would not represent a viable alternative to provide water to the City of Long

Prairie.

REDEVELOPMENT OF WELL NO. 1

Redevelopment of Well No. 1 does not appear to be a viable alternative under

this contract. Redevelopment of Well No. 1 could provide additional water to

treatment plan No. 1 which could relieve some of the stress off Well No. 2

but this increase in yield would not represent a real increase in available

water to the system.

-38-

Task 9 Reconnendations

•4

The work team of Bruce A. Liesch Associates, Inc. and Larson-Peterson

Associates, Inc. propose the following recommendations to meet the short term

and long term water supply needs of the City of Long Prairie. The proposed

solution consists of short term treatment of contaminated groundwater until

a permanent, new water supply source can be identified, constructed, tested,

and approved for use by the Minnesota Department of Health.

The recommended system and projected 'costs for the recommendations are

provided below. These costs were calculated by the individual treatment

firms and represent their best estimate of the costs of operating the system

each proposed. The results of our investigation indicates that the most

technically suitable and cost competitive means of treating the groundwater

for Wells 4 & 5 is through carbon treatment. Dr. Jerald Schnoor has further

indicated that carbon treatment will provide the most consistent effluent

quality, even with changing influent water quality.

Proposed Recommendation:

-Short term solution: The only short term solution that can provide

additional water to the system to meet peak water use demands of 1984 is the

treatment of the contaminated ground water at Wells No. 4 and 5. The

proposed treatment system would consist of activated carbon treatment of up

to 300 gpm of water from Wells 4 and 5.

A schematic of the proposed system is shown in Figure 13. The system would

consist of an activated carbon treatment unit which would treat the

contaminated ground water prior to water treatment plant 2. The system

would be installed either at Wells 4 and 5 or at the treatment plant.

Effluent from the carbon treatment system would be treated at treatment

plant no. 2 for iron and manganese removal or placed directly j^nto

distribution dependent on the treatment system design.

-39-

5)*i5<i|81 > i

> oo oH Z

5 O2 wo §

am

m

CO

O

ORGANIC TREATMENTACTIVATED CARBON

WELL 4 WELL SLIFT PUMP - LIFTEQUAL TO HEADLOSS THROUGHUNIT

300 ug/l

WATER TREATMENT

/

<8 ug/l

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE

TO DISTRIBUTION

The treatment alternative would be installed no later than June 1, 1984 andwould operate until an alternate water supply js located, developed, tested

and approved by the MDH.

-Long term solution: The most cost effective and technically feasible

long term solution is the development of (an) alternative water supply

source(s). This consists of the location and development of (a) new well

site(s) in Long Prairie. Two alternatives are available for the siting of

new water supply wells, those being the development and testing of the Well

No. 6 site and the exploration for new test well sites in areas distant form

the identified contaminant plume.

Phase I: Well Construction and Testing Procedures at Well Site No. 6

The installation of Well No. 6 as a test production well is the

first phase of an alternate water supply source investigation. Well 6

would be installed and tested to determine the suitability of the

well site as a municipal water supply source.

It is anticipated that the well could be installed within 20 days of

the issuance of a contract". Upon completion of the well, a pumping

test of not less.than 72 hours would be conducted to determine

' aquifer characteristics and areas of influence, and to detect

possible water quality changes. An analysis of the data generated

during the test will provide the information needed to determine

site suitability.

If the testing procedure results indicate that Well No. 6 could

produce uncontaminated water at an economic advantage over

treatment, then well house and transmission line construction could

commence. The system could be on line and ready for use no later

than August 1, 1984 and could be on line as early as July 1, 19fe4.

Once Well No. 6 is on line and producing water to the system,

treatment of water for Wells 4 & 5 could be discontinued. The

Schematic shown on Figure 14 illustrates this concept.

-41-

PROPOSED WELL 6

o

f»3

WELLS 4A5

UJzIII

zIIIo

flC

III

ORGANICTREATMENT

WATERTREATMENT

o-*-TO DISTRIBUTION

WELL 3

D ?^^J/\

^7~\1

|| ^

BRUCE A. UESCH ASSOCIATES INC.- coeuflNC MvoooiOGisn

Lon*


CONCEPTUAL DESIGN -WELL 6 INSTALLATION 14

Phase II: Investigation to Site and Develop a New Well Site

If the results of the testing procedures indicate that Well No. 6 is

located in an unsuitable area, new proposed well sites will have to

be located. An investigative program to locate new well sites in an

area remote from the area of contamination should be initiated in

1984. The scheduling and scope of the initial phase of the

investigation will depend on the results of testing at Well No. 6.

The recommended plan should provide. the City of Long Prairie with a

water supply capable of meeting the peak demands throughout the summer.

Project Costs for Recommendation:

3 months of treatment of contaminated groundwater: $39,650.00-$97,750.00

Connection to system: $8,000.00

Installation and testing of Well No. 6: $75,980.00

Construction of transmission line: $47,200.00

$167,830.00-$225,930.00

Project Costs for Recommendation if Well 6 is Shown to be Unsuitable:

3 months of treatment of contaminated groundwater: $39,650.00-$97,750.00

Connection to system: $8,000.00

Installation and testing of Well No. 6 $26,500.00

6 additional months of treatment of

contaminated groundwater $39,300.00-$112,500.00

$110,450.00-$241,750.00

-43-

BIBLIOGRAPHY•4

Bear, Jacdb., 1979, Hydraulics of Ground Water: New York, McGraw-Hill, 567.

Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 1970, Ohio, The Chemical Rubber Co.

Hobbs, C.H. and Goebel, J.E., 1982, Geologic Map of Minnesota - QuarternaryGeology: Minnesota Geological Survey.

Horvath, Ari L., 1982, Halogenated Hydrocarbons, New York, Marcel Dekker,Inc., 889.

Liesch, Bruce A., 1983, Long Prairie, Minnesota Test Drilling/Test Pumping.

Lindholjn, G.F., Oakes, E.L., Ericson, D.W., and Helgesen, J.O., 1972, WaterResources of the Crow Wing River Watershed, Central Minnesota:Hydrogeologic Investigations Atlas HA - 380, U.S.G.S.

Schwille, F., 1981, Groundwater Pollution and Porous Media by FluidsImmiscible With Water: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 21,p. 173-185.

Sittig, Marshall. 1981 Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals: NewJersy, Nbyes Publications.

APPENDIX

IRRIGATION WELL SURVEYLONG PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA

Location: T129 R33 Sec.4Owner: .Well log number: 129215Well information: 1 well, 16" diameter, 55' deep, 900 gpm (tested)Permit number: 77-3337Availability: Only available for emergency use such as fire.

Location: T129 R33 Sec.4Owner: Well log number: noneWell information: 1 well, 12" diameter, 120' deep, 600 gpmPermit number: 77-3033Availability: Could be available, may require a fee.

Location: T129 R33 Sec.5Owner: Well log number: 214697Well information: 1 well, 18" diameter, 51' deep, 400 gpmPermit number: 65-210Well log number: 132248Well information: 1 well, 14" diameter, 60' deep, 600gpraPermit number: 75-3271Availability: could not be reached prior to this report.

Location: T129 R33 Sec.5Owner: Well log number: 214696Well information: 1 well, 16" diameter, 40' deep, 400 gpmPermit number: 65-595Availability: Well is available free of charge. Any improvements to well

must remain with well. Not used since 1972.

Location: T129 R33 Sec.16Owner: Well log number: 214699Well information: 1 well, 16" diameter, 42' deep, 715 gpmPermit number: 68-240Availability: Not available.

Location: T129 R33 Sec. 32Owner: Well log number:221513Well information: 1 well, 12" diameter, 79' deep, 636 gpmPermit number: 75-3334 tAvailability: May be available. Fee may be required

Location: T129 R33 Sec. 33Owner: Well log number: 221406Well information: 1 well, 12" diameter, 51' deep, 500 gpmPermit number: 75-3334Availability: May be available. Fee may be required.

MINN. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY

129215/1W E L L R E C O R DIfcttlitM UM.•!-.»«

tQlmiM )QDrl>«

M« <"]rMr »•••«

V- »ft ^ C^A r\d

<* *«>t t««rs «o

!-{• \i.-\ i • • . \ 0 '

UIKJKJ

.(I"'/'9 7-41-t- (R...7. 1-61)

K.&5U&1 V &i07HIHH

4 .955_ R V A T I O H D E P A R T M E H TI S I O N O F W A T E R S

WELL LOG STATEMENT

Mall Rspoit Promp91r\Tvfe<vicftlr, UtttJMPdf Vmteta. Centennial Office Bldg., St. Paul 1, Minn.

n i r c c i o c

CirounJ *.

</

W e l l No .

Location of 'Well (address) r f' () ^)~Locate Wei I . o nPlat of Section

Describe Further by Lot. Block, N««re»t Highway

Drilled for: _

v^^V- REPORT OF FI HAL PUMP I M« TEST.,~ ~^

of TType of weDug, Dri

Static Water Level "land surfaceow—

Screen: Length

Pump: Type

.* "Diameter /(•> Slot

Horsepower

Water Level While Pumping'.

: Domestic [ I Industrial'^ Irrigation

Public supply [ | Comnercial I I Stock Q

WELL LOG

Geologic FonationsKind. Col or, Hard or Soft

Depth in Feet.Fr To

Geologic FormationsKind, Color, Hard or Soft

Depth in FeetFron To

£

f-

f*-

LOCATCP BY.

Address Verificatiort1 -

2 ••? . 3-

Na.~ne on Mailbox1 n».nt<->/-t-

] Plat Book

--Info. From owner o c o

[h- Info. From Neighbor " L>

tTT

1J Other_

f 1 Can't Locale Siate Whv

7/7* »M

> /

(-.->*. l - C l ) A J^JttSERVAT I OH D E P A R T M E N TD I V I S I O N O F W A T E R S

WELL LOG S T A T E M E N T

4 . DiVISlOfJ OF WATtifc T.Mail Report Promptly To Director, Division Ot Voters. Centennial Off ice SWg.. Sc. P.iut 1, Mino.

I ' i r e i l u r

PuM. *'7r

W e l l No.

Locat ion of Well (address)/><*) ,A Locate W e l l onU f/ I'J J'lst of Section

C^lty or Town

Describe Further by Lot,0 Block, Newest Highly.

Drilled for:

Date of Completion REPORT OF F I N A L PUMPING TEST

alion of Test--2_~_Ilrs. Min.! of wellDug, Driven. Bored, Drilled

- •Casing dian«ter _inch, from

Ft.^r*'**'aland surface

While Puirping_^2__Ft.

Use: Domestic f~l Industrial fl Irrigation

Public supply Q Comrercial f~l Stock [~1Pump: Type

YDRO ENGINEERING, INC. •—wx- 98*

WEli DfllUJ*G AND REPAIR- PUMP SALES AMD SERVICE

/ /Young America. Minnesota 55397

612457-3100

C l WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION RECORD• '_ ' • ' S'-*

TO .._

7r>!H« March

CITY Long. Prairie STATE

LOG OF FORMATIONSSWL

0 (O 28 sand and jjravel

38... to J<? .clay.

Itft... to ..62 jnedauJL^ray. sand _. ...to ...

—.Minnesota

WELL DESIGNfa m n g

SWL

SCREEN WELL DATAMake of Screen . .^igator ___ ...... ______________ .........

Size: Diam. ______ -k?... Jn. Length ________ 20_._ ft. Slot Size ..7P#

Location In Well . ___ J2.!

Fittings: Top „ _ lead packer

Bottom _______ Plat?,

Other Screen Data

to . _____ .62,'_ ...... Screen Metal .. lo.w...carboa_.ateel

ROCK WELL DATA

Open borehole , diam. to It.

WELL TEST DATA

_620 ....... gpm. Static Water Level .._ ...... 16 .-- Pumping Water Level .....39 .......

____ H. ______ hours of pumping (Drawdown ------ ..... ft.)PUMP DATA

Make Lv.O.Kukl£_^0.^. _____ Type

Model _._ _________ ....... .__. Serial Number".. ________ ...... _ ...... - Size

HP .2C ..... Dro Pie Size .£ _______ " & Length ..#<?.._.Drop Pipe Size . _______ " & Length . . < . . _ . Shaft Size & Lengt

/ OFM Head ..._ _ ' RPM

Jkbr: _.._.^.Ci_./7./. \'ol;s Phase Cycles

Well Seal _ -

Water Analysis: Hardness — PP™. Iron ppm.

Signed -

toID ..._ OD

Wt. Jbs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld. _ _WeldedDrive ShoeCemented .

to ^ID OD

Wt Ibs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld.WeldedDrive ShoeCemented

to

ID .._ ODWt. Ibs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld.

WeldedDrive Shoe .-.- -.-Cemented

HYDRO ENGINEERING, INC. BOX 98WELL DRILLING MO REPAIR -PUMP SALES AHO SERVICE

•3. 2/ YJ2 7 You"9 Am8ri". Minnesota 55397' 652-457-3100 /

WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION RECORD 7Date ............. ... Nay en.be r. 2 ...... _.. 1.1 ~3 _____

TO

ADDRESS ...... -' p

• . - • * V X

CITY ... fi9....r\**V*7 STATE

LOG OF FORMATIONSSWL

..Q... to _.iSL^.-jf.Ane.,fiandtoto ....to ....to „to ...to

LOCATED BY

Q Address Verification5WL

I

I I .o

Q"CFn'l't"Locata"State'Why

. to

. toWELL DESIGN

pth measured from .....tQP_QJL_caain&_SCREEN WELL DATA

Make of Screen ...John3Qn..IrrigELtor.

Size: Diam. 1.2 In. Length -2Q ft. Slot Size ....$58-..l

Local Ion In Well 2-9-1 'to k9_' Screen Metal _

Fittings: Top '. .....

Bottom —

thcr Screen Data

Open boreholeBOCK \VELL DATAdiam. to . ft.

WELL TEST DATA. spm. Static Water Level ...~k\ Pumping Water Level .r

J. hours of pumping (Drawdown ft.)PU3IP DATA

Make . Type _ .._

Model Serial Number .". Size

HP Drop Pipe Size " & Length _. Shaft Size & Length

"FM Head ' RPM

Motor: _ Volts ._ Phase Cycles

\Vc!l Seal _ _.._ - - —-

Water Analysis: Hardness ppm. Ifon -

D.._ to -29. -... ID JL2_5/S. OD

Ibs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld.WeldedDrive ShoeCemented .

to_____________ ID __________ ....... _ ODWt. _____ ....... _______ ...... Ibs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld. ____________________Welded ___________ .......... __ ..... _..Drive Shoe ..._ ...... ------------------ .....Cemented ...... --------- ..... -----------

3.

_ ID _ _. ODWf Ibs. per ft.Thrd. &. Cpld.WeldedDrive Shoe - -Cemented —

W A I t M W C L l . n t l . U n j I<- T -

of Ixnar »r«iri«

J-.

KMMATKW IOO

• Lone Pr»ltl«, fti. 56347 4. WKU. MPTH

4-3-1977OM.M O iO

•a ..a

__ • >. -».Oil hail."

•a.«OAirO mi

JtSfiML

Clay20' ^.

JL31

«.40 alot-20 slot

ODD DCC

ItL rUMPIK UYP.

.>J<

iQi

Dr. o.

• __•IkQ

Boa

'//or ;

'-•—' .. 1—

lac. 73157

,:.. fe.-u.77


M. Immml**

- JfcMAMISll K I C O . O I J / J 4 U

E

T

o c. /

KMMAnOHlOO

•ft*—«

jOr« «MI

O

oIJQ«M*

iQc . iO

a^

-:r

?

_B.

-ft.

£.:'-.

«..*.•

•. STATK WATCR UVtL

' n£]iMk~^^^^^^^^ l—<p^_

. WfcULHtAO COMPACTION

MINIM. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY1/74

Reporc Promptly To Direc

i^ I0;i:»t.r<v AT.'/ON D E P A R T M E N TD I V I S I O M OF W A T E R S

W E L L L O G S T A T E M E N T

•t.lion Of Va«f», Centennial Office Bldg., St. Paul 1, Minn.

Publ.

O'ouncl V.

V . c l l No.

I Loca t ion of V.'ell (address).

~7~^/c/

Locate W e i 1 onPlat of Section

C o u n t y C i t y o r To*n

Describe Further by Lot. Uloclt. Nearest

Drilled for:

Address_

Driller

o . i - ' ' " ' I

Tvrp. /3 ?

Hange

~Date of Completion

Type of

/VV ?/-?/ /

rvpt.h.Dug, Driven. Bored, Drilled ]

ffsing diameter__Z£_inch, from

-

inch, from

_ incli, from

sv REPORT OF F I H A L P U M P I H G TEST

' \ /I Duration of Test / Hrs.

Rate of Pumping

.Min.

_GPM

Static Water Level. Ft.A*weland surfaceBelow

Water Level While Pumping-"? 7 Fc.

Diameter /1- Slot size./**' Use: Dotnestic [~| Industrial Q Irrigation E

'., Horsepower x Public supply f~l Commercial {~1 Stock Q

W E L L L O GDepth in Feet Depth in FeetGeologic Formations

Kind, Color, Hard or SoftGeologic Formations

Kind,Color, Hard or Soft

Plat BooInfo.

UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORGEOLOGICAL SURVEY

WATCH ROOUMCU BKAMCH

/> f • j? r1 - / 7

1. Location: State....

Nearest P. 0.

RECORD OF WELLMinnesota Todd

"

Distance from P. 0. •/*

County

Direction from ?. O. „. .__..

Vi sec. JLV_, T. 1&JK* R. *•if :.. •!„- • _ -i._-t -...i ....... i_. on *««t Blxie of road from Longi A in i^ni. v. irigF aL1 cci. nini I IHII IL^I ---- '

Pralrl* to1 Locate w«ll on i>Ut of McUon.

2. Owner:

Driller: 4b« Petcraon

Address Long Prairi*, Uinn>

Address Long Prairia, Minn.

St««p hillaida3. Situation: Is well on upland, in valley, or on hillside?-.

4. Elevation of top of well:

5. Type of well: ; kind of drilling1 rig used __

6. Depth of well:

ft the level of ._.(Abort or btlow)

{Doc. drlvvn. bond, or dritUd)

ft.; year in which well was finished

(So*, depot. Ulu. or Unon)

(Solid tool. {•vtln*, roUry. «U.)

Does well enter rock? ; if so, at what depth? ft.; kind of rock

7. Diameter: At top inches; at bottom : inches.

8. Principal water bed:

Depth to principal water bed(Gr«v*l. sand. cUjr. or rock. U rock. itaU kind)

ft.; thickness of bed ft.

If other water supplies were found, give depth to each

9. Casings: Kind ; size ; length ft.; between depths of and

Kind ; size ; length ft.; between depths of and

Kind ; size ; length ft.; between depths of and ft.

ft.

ft.

Packers (if any): Depth at which packers were used

Screen or Strainer: Was well finished with screen? —

length of screen ft.; diameter

—; kind of screen „

.; kind

inches; size of openings

10. Head: Does well at present overflow without pumping? 3T.?A_..; did it overflow when new? ;a

if flowing, give pressure Ib. per sq. inch; or height water will rise in a pipe..__. ft. above surface;

original pressure or head ; if not flowing, give water level in well ft. below surface.

11. Pump: Is the well pumped? ; kind of pump ;

size or capacity of pump

12. Yield: Natural flow at present (if any)

well has been pumped at

; kind of power ....

gallons per minute; original flow gallons per minute;

gallons per minute continuously for hours;

Quantity of water ordinarily obtained from well _. gallons per day. \

13. Use: For what purpose is the water used?

14. Quality of the water:(Hard or wft. fiWi or Mlty. «tc.)

15. Cost of well, not including pump:

_„; is there an analysis? _..?.*• 55

Temperature of water ° F.

Date

Name of person filling blank

AddressOn th« b*«k «f Ihii ill**! (U« cb« nfmr4 •( IK* l ChrMffti which lh« w«ll p«»*«« mn4 *•/ aditr fart* n«t rtvvn akh««r

LOG OF WELL

KIND OP ROCK OR OTHER MATERIAL(Clf* «to» u4 Ml wbrtlw hud tt Mft)

I allow clay and Band streekj.

Data obtained by I. 8. llliaon.•

• •

8ottro« of datai Fll«« of Ulnn««o

•

•

r>EKTH. IN FEET

l>—

ba G«ol. J

•

T«—

umjf .

1

THICKNESS.1M FEET

4

REMARKS(Fijirlallf [nr*niullMi M to waUr f*»4)

•

\

»»..fOrtll»r

STATC OF NINNerrTA

Of "HtlM W A T E R W E L L R E C O R DL •jXAr.cii or *Com'-r '*»•

"Dlfltwie* and Dlrvctlcn rro« Ho*4 Int»n»ctloo« tfi> Scr««c A*.dr«»i «Ad Clcy of U«U Loc«cla«"•• ?rS-

125604

. ALL DCPm

i>• i~ '

»M of Co^l.Uo.

Jl[3 C«kl> tool

Qlollo. roJ

»QDrl«M

3Q"'

- 1 Au«.r

sroRMATIOI 100

L

15- REMARKS. ELEVATION. SOUBCI CP DATA, etc.tf»« a laecnJ «Ju«t. t/ nMd»ii.

:Q Irrt«>tloa

?r~| ladwt

<Q

CASUIBDLAM. T

ttiwud'Hi v.id^i Q 3suet rj-2 s^». n

V7U. to ft. d«ptk

rt.

_rt. d^«k

. '<•-??»..„.;„ ,oX

Or OMO. hol«

'' l ft. .»• ^ 'J ft.3«t b«tVMB

ft. >n4.

ft. ai*4

(t.

(t.

X • / -Pctf%. Y

STATIC vaa Ltm.

' •/-' _rt. |l»ad «ur

0. PUWING LZVEL [Mlow lAad furfac*)

C^ rt. .rt., / h».

ft. ajt<r hr». pu^plac

U. VSU, ULAD COHPLZTIOI

I{Q Pleln* «4»|>t«r 2Q Bu<>t>t offt«t 3Q At V«ut L2" abor,

U. 'J>L1 (rouuaf

[] T

O.pti: frt»_

from _rt. . „_

3. •••rose loure* or pottlbl* coatwila^lo

"u.u dlilafMtW um *° D

D«t« li

-Q»oi

of droj rtp*

H»t«rl>l of dro» »!B>_

<V^ -rt.) 'UJL-

»BMlqr_

o. VATEJ VS.L comtACTOii's cornnoiTic* \

Ttli mil w drill** inter ft Jurt»dlctlo« «id ul> nport !• trut to

th« b«t of 39 kaovlvdii* *>d boll«f.

»H ft T t B.JV

?/£'! *"; •-"«

, .• , - S**teh ••» of *«il li 4. WELL DUTH (c '.•.."•. PM« W Ci

H-«.

S•1 ovU-

-f-2

tiQ.

MTVti^tn lOl.il

4OF»hrl« ».»»•»-

hOHMATION LOU HAHimtJiSOff OK MAT) ON

•DC

o

/ fHEIGHT: At**/* _.,

f-/ ...» ^\ >

• 7W*t(M

/ >

I BC_«..

_«.

-«.

». STATIC WATER LEVEL

nn»M«nMr4.

VII. WftLL HtAO COMPUiTtON

id:

°r- 9* C'T*-jii(u*MttOt« . ^n

-£: *~.3l

iCT>ii»ii.itii

03

It. WATKR WELL CONTRACTOR 1 CERTIFICATION

T» -ril »^« tMMt ntm mj MXklln n< um t oit l» Of »

K. / r , r X V\ *--.•* S' - ' r '. I I • •~^^

II. Hr.UAKKS. tLkVATIOH. SOUKtltOK UATA.XC.

f fV


STATE OF MIWtESOT*

DEfWrt-Bfr Of HEALTH

I. L3CATTO "if V*Co-itTj**^

• M A T E R «ELL R E C O R Da Sutvt*, LUI.Ol-.Ot

TistaUiev tvad OlrvcxloM Iat«r».Tetion* en*

S«CtlOn 1laaat»*r

iq fu*ll toc.itl.rn

125623

\_i^rvcy fVct: ,-. e ll < -k V~V T.«i?

roiuwnoi uw

fiD

/?<?£

9AAC

!/*« a ttamd aKaae.15. RCTAJUC3. ELEVATIOi, SOUVCZ OP DATA. «tc.

HARDHISS 07

t";

i n v i K i r-ci-ilOf.irAl <;i!OVFy rOPV

». «LL DOT* (coapUtad). Data1 of Coaclatloa

iQcaaia tool *Qiu«ar»a

iQ.

Zf~l Irrlotlo >aln<

J^j Udmtiy

sQcoaaarelal

T. C*3IJiODIM.

'DBlack \f\l . CalT. (_}'

"T to. to t I I ft. d.pthdap Ul

.ft. daptb

_ft. daptk

-Jol^ 'LU » i

HKICKT:

Ittrfaea

lb../ft.

Drt«a SkoaT T»

Or opaa hala

frua. rt. to

-^ •> 'C'X«.'' I Dla. •'••"''

Slot/O

It. (nd

(t. and

"•

1C.

). STATIC UATRI L£VB.

J ft. K] balovland lurfaca

<" • -~

10. PUV1BG UVO. (bclotf laad lurfacaT

ft. aftar hn. p«pln(_

_ft. aftar hra. punplnj|_

J.p.i

_f.f.i

11. 'JELL KIAD COHPLTT10»

SM™«OI offi«t JfcjJAt l<ut

QT.. QKO

Daptb: froa_

froa

_rt. to_

ft. to

L3. N«»r««t imirc* of

CWt

Data U»t»U»d

Maufaeturar'l Sa**

ft. capacltr

of dn» Dip*

5l 1 tae l»r

TbU v«ll »m> irlU»« undar ay Jurlidletloa aad tkl> nport l> tru« to

ti« bait of ay kDovladca «Kd WU.f .

• -Data ' / r ,' '

W A T E R W E L L R S C O H Oto* *»*' 5—»**

33 -it

j:^^ r s.4. *tLL OtPTM (

s-I ni

-.-I cA «•/_ II.

• •a

hOHMATION LCXJ»O <w o-Jio.

<2_

LA/At/".

' c Vi ti*> JG t, n

MINN. DEPT.OF NATURAL RESOURCES COPY

_n.

_n-

o-v SV» v?

10. PUuriNC LEVEL UMn- KM >i>r>c>>

. WtLL HEAU COMPLETION

Ov.

I J. N«W«M HH«1« of

«C3c iiiifiM 4O

14. WATU WXU. COHTKACTOK1 CCHnriCATIOH

i /-^fe ^»A

•(. i •, o P i'rred m»f at w«ll taciiiM. D.I. ^C«-W,I«.

J

*/- ? < - 7 7 ;

lOl-tM.no>

J2TLlOlnnl - iiQ

J 2^33-7 9 tffl

LOCAT!

1 -" n Address V erification1 . n N^rriA fin

3~D Lot-B!4 • D fiat Bool

6-Q Info. Frort7 -FT Other5\

Q Can't Lo<

'•'O'-"1' 'Vo!«!f«Sil°''' >"0>' I TO

0 BY

OwnerNeighborrri n- ""*•

ate State Wh>

>OM.iMtlp<l

f ' / '

oHblCHT: Aba««;»ttow

'"

,

, *

'// M. t. /// 1 n w*,n /•- '''•/ ii

_ to- » -

. In. !• .

'M|kl / ' - 7 ifc. 1*1

fl. w*ffel ifc^m.

ft. Wntht Ibtjtl.

S«f/Cn / ?

». STATIC V

intf MrfK*10. PUMP INC LEVEL (»«lo«» U*4 uwfer*)

ft. *fl«T - .-_ fl»». P^M

v- ^,.

zE3 fWMiM»lt«

CU.YA..

JO

D**lh: froM _

frOM.

_ft . t«

. ft. I*

J. "-f-ni ttrin-Tt ir* f*i.it*i fflrl—"--inn .. -

/ ///- >

T:?. 77

_ /.-f S

H>mU of tat nlf

i*. WATCH wtLLCOHT«Acro»-3cennrK:ATio«

M of my

x


i

P. C. BETTENBURG & COMPANYREGISTERED

ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS

1437 MARSHALL AVENUE

i SAIMT PAUL. M:NWESSTA! NESTOR 61»l

I

NEW

r'TEST HOLE DATA

forWELL AT LONG PRAIHIE, MINN.

Data by Jftofc SohultaHole atarted Jan. 3, 1942

Location Material

Grouni to 12 ft. -Dry sand.* ' - ' - ' • . • : .

12 ft. to 21 ft. Fine sand and gravel '•-

21 ft. to 62 ft. Coarse sand and grtVf) ' '

62 ft. to 83 ft. Very fine sand, littif' clay

83 ft. to 106 ft. Gravel

Notes} Water struck at 12 ft. below ground. The water levelrose 2 ft. to a point 10 ft. below grade when sinkingtest hole between 83 ft. level and 87 ft.' Between 87ft. level and 95 ft. level it dropped 1 ft, to- a point11 ft. below grade. At 95 ft. level it returned tonormal level of 12 ft. below grade, where it regainedconstant for the balance of the test holt iurvey.

Water samples were taken e.t the 40 ft., 60 ft., 80 ft.;and 100 ft. levels. ! -• -

I GRAVEL PACK WELL DATAfor ..*:--«•:•••'" •

NEW WELL AT LONG PRAIRIE, MINN.

\ Data by McCarthy fell Co.

Well was completed June 9th, 1942. /' .

The final test on this well revealed the followingTtwltf. Thedepth to water at rest was 12 feet. While pumping at the rate of550 gallons per minute the water level became stabilised~at adepth of 25 feet. In other words, there was a 13 foot drawdownbelow static level which, converted to specific capacity oft thewell, gives * figure of 42.3 gallons of water per minute per footof drawdown. '•'

L l R E C O R DStatute* l56A.3l-.3t

for '"izm 123593To A 3 ..' I r> or s.. 3 J I. or v

>fco» exact loefttlcM of v»LL la MetLcn «rt4 vltA "*.'N

s

r .•i •*•

ronwnai LOO

o,O Ii \ ^ c\ v

f

li*« aR2MAAK5. ELEVATIOA, SOUPCS OP DATA, etc.

"07FORMA710*

7i\A''f -

->r> > V

R

T

7f


'JILL 33TS (co«H«t»a)

QDD»t« of Co»»L«tlo

loQou,

^f~1 HoUav r«4

7l_j I»d«t

!Q Air Condltla.il

r. cxsijoDIAM.

r«<ted£3lTh

Black

_lo. to

_1B. to

la. to

I v.ldtd Q] 1

| K«IOI->. ^f,—r*-,\

Surfac. f

••'O ft. d.pt&

_ft. dept*

ft. depth

d. SCKEBI

DrUw Sho«? I.. Bo

Or opm hou

fro. ft. to

Slot/C*tu«

3«t b«tw^». . V_/ ft. and _

ft. >nd

ft. and

ft.

ft.

fc.

9. STATIC UATTR L£VCL

""I -.) ft. 0 •»!•» f~] ••«»•laod mrfaca

Tae«)

_hr».

_bra. pt«pliic_

>~O ft. Uf r__2_l«. »«•!.« 3'l.tf1-! _g.p...

_»-P.»-

11. WtXL HZAD CWTLCTIOJI

">t L2* «bo»»

12. w«ll (routldt

[Xpth: fro. _ft. to_

ft. to

_ft.

ft.

13. N«ar»«t BOUTC« of po««lblo eeatu^natlon

IWt

V.U. 41»l>r«eud vpo. co^Utl«•* r«« C( '° CDtT7<

B«t» lut«U*4 Q- ' •' "I ' / /

^ Quo* l»t*il«4

..V" O ~ r ,T i^_

^ *— 'ft. e«e»cltT

Typt:

drop tlD» '• '

jQt.s. turn in. Q »«'•«'

16. vKmvEU. conucroics cnmnci-non ^

Ibl* v.11 v*a drlll^ wdffr ^r Jurlidietlo. Mid thll rvport !• tru* to

th« b«*t of tv kaovl«d«« *^ o«ll«f.

; . V S ; - ^ ! -'•- -:

Lic9H*»« Buntttf

Slsn«d_Authorlt*d

flan* of 5rlLl*r

-;•-"'^.•••'.• .. •„...• u.'s, ospr.-omf

-'-'. -'• MASTER C A R D -

.WELL SCHEDULEGEOLOGICAL SUR VS1T-

/ ': •< '

WAT£R'RESOURCES DIVISIONS

'•' :U.<

! 7

[14\&S\&\ Q! ?; q = 4 l.r; Q fTTol ' 'n^^

toc*l" . / fl 6 M

i i ij. i'••"• ' £"« sr-r^.i-^Hr iVisirlî^S&.îWl - i - i - i ' ! ' f ^^-

- ' " ' • • • - ---(o- .. (D ; co - .• (N) . < '-. • rs>"- - <w>

?; County, F«d. Cov't, Cicx,.Corp or C», P r iva te , State Agency, Vinter Dt»t

-.-—.','

> _ :'. -

(E) (F) G3f <O" (K> -(H) (P) W ''Pover, Fire, Deo, Irrt Had, Ind, 7 S, See,

:••) Recharge, Deaal-P S, Deaal-other, Other •

(«> (P) (B) "(T) ' (0)Oba. 011-ga>, Recharge, Tejc, Unoaad, V:

»/L m«j». :

«, Uaate, Destroyed' _ LxL

Field aquifer char.-."| j

ftp AD

' I ~] ' ' ' ~ • ' ' • " ' ÎJLJ _J Pump«a« Inventory: ^/T.)period,:

'Log

WEI L-DESCi»IPTION CARD

s.vi; AS 0:1 PASTES CASH | p«?th v«ii : f t i / ! ?< iKeaa.

Depth cas^d:(fir.t pert:) Ct

i) iO •! / ! C. .Caalnj

•M^ accuracy

; Diaa. •_ f

"•' '" (C) '•• " (F) %: '.'" " (C) (H) (0) (P) £& (V> (W) (X) (a)-... , \ ' porouj gravel v. • gravel v. horlz. open pert., •crcen, sd. pt.. ahored» poen •r1".13!'1 concrete, .(p«r«.) , (acreen) , gallery, end, ^ bole,. -otllef

..--: ;' • Hethodl :(.\) . -CB>'.,...CS3i- (D);(H) ' (J) 00 > .. (R) (T) . . 00 (W) . (Z) 'Drilled- *^r bored, cabTe, dug," hyd jetted, air • reverse trenching, driven, drive . •'• •

" —• - ' —• percusaton, ritery, •. waeh

VI

" % •'' £L££""^ • (type)

i 1 1 1——i • I netnoa b 1

» ! ! ! ' ••*- I °.t«r.lr.edL..J

Ift I . ! ! P Accuracy;

Sp. Conduce

Tatcc. color, ecc.

sl—I I—!—'—I ""•_« * 10 I J Teep. *FI i i 1 fJSple

1 . JH"d.~7T- p?.

J4 /• -rr

STlfE Of M1NKESTTA

DEPARTMENT OF

. -.c. j- .-,•««_,. IA

CEP«T>«T OF HWLIM/

/

______^

!TH f E R W E L L R E C O R DMHHSOT* MI9U* VIU K.

/ o r lH>t \~ \ _^.'-^y '~<vr,"

" • .- -i i •

StLOtf •

w

»ct lo»tl(M of vtll IBN

i i

'

-x

. -I— .

.....s

1 1 -rilf '

t. patmTKM

Mctloa grid vltk X.

E

J-*

LOO

<

uc

<

rv,...C // . . ." . ifr

'-'"' '/<.. ./'-"', i 1 , /

/x3* -5 "5

nj^l/

/</y /A/" //-'./•b-^cfT/4• -

- • " ;_. ....''..

15. RZHARXS. KLZYATIOI. SOUKS• a *«oon<

V

:

Sketch ••{

1 T O-O S'

COLOR

3/c...

s// '

/ /

C: -,,.*.,

,/c, , ,/

-?4»PPJ>

/^X5t

^

y T">

-- -. • -

— - •-•

-

lakMt, if nftJfd.

HAftDRSa 07FDfMATIOfl

•U;,/tlf- -',///wCO

J^B,(

^^

-

I'tJL' -

; -.-

, ,

.

-. ..

-

> or »«Li

, . <

Y 'rnoM

0'f*s

f — :

*?

)^

-

loeAtvon.

TO

7

x?7

.-— •

r^

^

—

OF DATA. etc.

AJIIMNI f^PD! OOICAI. SURVEY COPY

1. T^op ^ — Tt_~ / '

L f r ' F f - r f « « r ^ A ^~'V. USLI. Dzrtll (co^>l«t»d) D»U of CoivKtlon

-^"^r r.. y^-/C-7S~5.

tQ (UkU tool «Q ««^«n» 7[] Drl<n IdQ Bu«

jQ^t^r *Q J«tt^ °|~1 foi^r Au««r

6. UU

tQD6M«Ue «Dft*llo S^ftf J^lmiuttrr

T. CA8IXO 1 JtrlOIT: Abo»»/3«to«

•"-/ "* '72 1 / / < <7/ !•. ttf * — •' *^ ft. dvptJi Uvlflht ' '' ' > /Ibl./ft.

U. to ft. d»Ul

la. t« ft. dvptfc Orlw Soo«T T«« 9o^

8. SCHin Or opn hol<; , ! - > . < r

)taki1— '' 1 < 1 * -- V • • fro, ft. to ft.

T ^ ^ V t v , . . ! .> ^-^ '^/ ,'<•/„.. J"

31ot/C«iu« • '- 1 1 Uutk *"*"

S*t bvtwMa .*!!> ^. fe. «nd ^ ^ ft.

ft »d ft k - i -^- c n. fe rft. uri ft.

' 1 fcj^" fV| l—i I.- . f "1^~s! ^J ft. K I belov I 1 •kow D*t* ^••urwl * O ( * * /*^

Ian* «urfac«

ft. aftor hn. vuvlnc C.P.H.

U. VOX H£tD CCWLJTIOf

iQFltlna xterUr JQ Buoant off»t ¥0 At l»ul L2* «oo>»

12. V.ll trout.ar

l[~l»"«t eMnt JC?lj«toolt. 3f~l

.. Itoptk: m / ft. to '^/ r-'l ft.

tram ft. to rt. j

13. Mvamt aoure* of po««lal« eoataaioatloa

r««« UmtioB tn*

«.U dl.l.r.. ^o latio,, ,..# ..Q

l». PW»

»»to lm»taU>4 T*1 "^ ^ . ' _ ' * "

}&-•—- ;

Itotel li***r IT «olu

Uaxtb of drop rtpa ft. e*Mcl«r «.»...

•hMrlal of dm P!D>

*"' InlT"1"" Ji^JfCT ^1*l""""i

Il£, WARR WELL COVTIUCTOI'9 corrlflCAnaM \

Thli v«ll n« drJU*d iMd*r «r JiDH«dleti« aa« tkla r»port If tro la

tn« b*«t of >v k»ovl«d|i« «nd ballvf.

W'.,/ VvN Sir. < VUe" b»« ' : ' . ' . < • *•'£-'

. .. ,, ,3 z:iii, K \ , » . '^4/ ...Jtfr^' '.. »«¥^/-~•:.V,1: t^.TTc"»;..<. <> + I , i M , r H -

:<>n» or Orlll.r . .

,

Tr , . , ',W A T E R W E L L R E C O R D— ,„-„.-..,.» U3Q83

*

'

//, -idrirtw.

'

tOXUAnONLOG AKIH4K&Sl-OHMArKH

tC]AKCrm<ltl(Hdii< «d

t

>£>•«»

2dc.h.

HEIGHT: Aben/t

/ / i

:«-(;..ft. W«t|ftl

_fl. WligM

_n. wrirt..

-ft

-ft.

ft. SCREEN t> op«N Mitt

h' r 901/GMM

SH» _fl.

_B.

_n.

9. STArtCWATEK LEV^L

DIM u««u^ L-

10. PUMPING LbVCL (below lurf iwfjcv)

n. »n»f ^ kf& fmmffal

. hrv pumvini

II. WKLL HEAD COMPLETION

. W«i irowltdT

r- ^~

/- •C/--6 1C0«v<>: frw«. . n. !•

.«.!»'

— •ifir—<i~*^-

U«p» •* *™» H»*

MaMfM ol *0» 9*9*

T>r><

iDlrt

t*. WATKRWELLCDNTRACTOII-SCUTtFICATlONCDNTRACTOII-SCUTATlN .

«M«M«rMto4iM^««y|wMi«lMM4lMftrafwA>

> '. . T " * - ' .1 - 1 ) i A - - T / > '

II. KKMA»K5.tLkVATIOH.SOUKCIIOrOATA.>l>.


DEPW»T>€NT OF HEMJH W A T E R H E L L R E C O R DJtatyt»» HH.3l-.ai 117652

TODDDl»*Mie>> <wd Dlrvctloa fro* *n*4 la

29 129 '1. or t.

33••4 Cltf of W.U Locicli

'••

Prairie"V

ratMATIOH LOO

Sand

12.9-33-29

1). RCMAfUa, tLCVATTOff. 50URCX OF DATA, «tc.


k. UIU. DOTH (coapl

tool *Q».».

rod CHMr

07-

C] Irrl«.Uoo,

3QT««» W.U

*Qr<*u« :

!Qur Coadltlomla«

CD»Q Co«>nlal

T. CASHODIAM.

H

i QI "«i«^ nj

_ft. d«*U

_ft. d*pU

_rt. i«pi»

Sffll'tn

KUOIT: Abo»/l.l<>

Surfaw^

»«l«trt lb../ft.

TuX J0

Or oom hoi*

fro* n. Co

20 slot

It. and

ft. in*

. ''•

ft.

[t.

9. STATIC WATER LZVEL

ft. Qb.lo» Qabo««" td turfim. pufiiie UVH. ;ui» i^d .0,-? .i

^O ft. aft^r hr». ptaapln|_

ft. kft*r bn.

11. UILI, KUAD CO»rtXTIOH

12. "«U (TDIIt>4!

n '•• c^«

Daptk: fra>_

1}. louro of po»Ul* cont»«l.«tlo« •

J.UU

\ h.~D.Flint. Walling

6/6/75n»«

totel luriwr

. Laa<U ft drop plp»_

Nttortal of drop pip>_

_ft..naparlty_

»«lt« 33Q

1Q I.P..

Lastic~L.a. Tui»loa

i's cntnncATToi

hl> nil vu 4rlU«d notr w Jurli<UetlA «n« •->!«

ttn k«t of v teooUl/i* »4 I

Clarissa, Minn.

Slawd

,/74

I 1 0 / 3 1 0

n

s•1 wii

• " -i .^ '

4. wtLL DCrTH (onpMM) • CMm X Co~pltl4o>

FORMATION LOU HAKIWt.S&OKOHMATION

Oc

lOr

19

7 -V S4 *

52/3.)A****• 3--C- H r"V > f-.f.\.

fl. and

fLaW

n. »*4

«. STATK: W A F K H LEVFL

/ 7 -9 -7H

10. PUMPING LCVEL (k^wUMl wr(act>

. Hft-fMiaJaf

II. WtLL MBAO COMPLtriOM

lOflaMfnvM offnt jQAi

j UCJA FED BY

i . I'eriffeatioi Mailbox

3-3-Boc<Frc TI Owner _ _.

6 ' D tnfo. Fro n NeighborOther^Can't t n Stata Wh

Utf « MCOM4 IJWL tfHttdf*.

av« g^.2dir<».Mrt<«

D lfer frofli. -ft.

_«.

,7-' ',-u

i ; _ . . j..DNX

HiMfMiuWt «•••

It. WATER WEU.CONT*ACTOII1CEHTIFICAriOM

fin > \TM

^"^"T"" " "*? ' I I . />»•//:. 7 \.^^-

II. Ht.MAMKl. tUVATIOM. SOU »t t O> DATA, •!«.

Ma** of Dnl1«r

MINIM. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COPY5ri« MM

HYDRO ENGINEERING, INC. "BOX 93WEIL DRJLU3G AND REPAIR-PUMP SALES AND SERVICE ~"

Young America. Minnesota 55337

612-467-3100

WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION RECORD 7s -3

ADDRESS .............

LOG OF FORMATIONS

SWLtoa., to <£ . H L - . * * . * ? .

. t o _<„ ...e.*ft.fcA . . . . . . . . . . . . . —

o to . ____ j.4..?.. to _£?

to

to

SWLJ-^ooi ;J 3V

? . . — ! • • l"_"i:; n ., t .. . • - - - , - — . ,

3 •:-! f - • • • - . .

to _„„J 6 - • i ;,;.-, • - , . . , .

to 7 ...... ":.™:::™ii:ii£sr-._.I ' - u cr.,-..;.,-tO ..pl-.p—^'T^Z^rr—rrszTa."I V-Lr'1 ' L/J-a'e Slate Whyto .to .

WELL DESIGN

1/lptli measured from _./^yD—~-6..£..-..C~49~*&S?—J -'SCREEN WELL DATA^_^^ . ^^

M<%ke of Screen "(teSTc It «*-» * AI> C#/f/»^.*/<?X< -

Size: Diam. ../*L.- in. Length ...AO.._._ ft. Slot Size

Location in Well ...-JT.?. to ?..?._ ^Screen Metal

Fittings: Top

Bottom _...4>«a./c£>/.

Other Screen Data

Make

Static Water Ilevrt-^fe«-.V? Pumping Water Level

hours of pumping (Drawdown ..._?*.£ ft.) y^ ^^ fePUMP DATA

Type-

Modei Serial Number ...T.S/. -S™ Size

.._£<?- Drop Pipe Size ..£' .." & Length ..£p—. Shaft Size & Length..--^/.*

Head ' RPM -

%Kfc° ./..!./. Phase - Cycles

M _

Well Seal -

Water Analysis: Hardness —- — PPm- Iron ppm-

CASING STRINGS

*._.._ to ._4T9i..._/S7>t_..._ ID „-../.&..- ODWt. .._ __ Ibs. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld _Welded *Drive Shoe

ICemented

ID ODIbs. per ft

Thrd. & Cpld.WeldedDrive ShoeCemented - — —

to - -ID _ OD

\Vt - • H«. per ft.Thrd. & Cpld.

WeldedDrive ShoeCemented - —

WDRQ ENGINEERING, INC.WELL QBILUNS AJJjJREPAIfl-PUMP SALES AND SERVICE

Young America, Minnesota

612-467-3',CO

553-47

.....13

r. .

/ ^-/ CV

....Ci- to ...•?— ...^.-l-.ri:1?— :..^~.fl ............... ----

to _ ____ .i'.v-?-

WELL DESIGN

WELL LOG AND CONSTRUCTION RECORD

Date .-.»'-'V- :^-- f t . ;

TO . '.

ADDRESS M..O..-.\. . /?..<:..•> •:.£.'..£...- - "'' ' / /<

STATE _... -

L'Od OF F ORMATIONS P[\3 5 -3 3> 3 ^SWL

SCREEN WELL DATA

M.-ike of Screen .^..c.^^^..:\.....-.^-jr..r..'..^.^'f(.i'. -

Size: Diam I2r. in. Length A2.'-..'J.'.-.... ft. Slot Size f.ff...f.f..3.f..?.

Location in Well -...£.$..'. to ...?'/ 1 Screen Metal „.._.*..__'__

Fittings: Top ...A.£.5.5* j&..3.£..*.?.£- - -

Bottom p.JA.T.C - - -

Dthcr Screen Data - - ~

BOCK WELL. DATA

Open borehole ...._ - diam. to It.

WELL TEST DATA

gpm. Static Water Level ..£..... Pumpins Water Level ..%A

" - '

.^^-

hours of pumping (Drawdown .—?../_ ft.)PUMP DATA

._ Type .0\.Make . . . . . . O ^ - - . . ^ . . . -

Model Serial Number - size_ _ _ _ _ _ _ • - - ••• •* ~ ••...—--- ^

, HP k°... Drop Pipe Siz* . (<! " & Length ...HO... Shaft Size i Length...?.?...'..V

:-M Head -' RPM - —

tP: ..6.C._-dU..7^ts - Phase - Cycles

Well Seal ....... _ ...... ---------

Water Analysis: Hardness . I ron-

CASING STRINGS

_. .. to ..ID

Wt IbsThrd. & Cpld

WeldedDrive ShoeCemented . ._ _

2.

to _ID ... . ...

Wt - IbsThrd & Cpld, . . .WekJed

Drive Shoe —

_ ^.. .

3.

ID ._Wt — - IbsThrd & Cpld

Welded

ODper ft-

..._. OD

. per ft.

.... OD. per ft

_

,-J-* '•Signed .W ^ £f fC ^^^

J ^ I E -if rimtifry' j — 'i^~7 i') ^\ — matsorn aiiqut nu. no-.CEPA«ThtNT or Htjti, / /X /> i W A T E R H E L L R E C O R D

ri. -JOTT.*-...^! £ ' / £ O x' ' *"'•**• "•«•« «••«-" 10, r/ " ~ ;;"

S. or 3. "g*. oKjfl

Show «x*ct locntloa of v«U i« **etiaa grid wlN

_ l . . . V. / (

Ui 1. -,- • •- Sk.tcb B^ of v«ll loc.tloa.

H - -|- - - + - - A. - E

H— • l"1'"M- 1

S -

1. K«M»TIC« 140

X? ,/

/^-7_34/-2/^ Z-£fy I*±

J>/ .'6V/ £'J£1

-—

. . — . .

i u«« a ttotma15- KZ>U]KS, ELZVATICCt, SOUKCI OF DATA. «tc.

\

i

colon

^c_..'•

L-;L $j\

/<^±"£

^ /A

... _.. .

.....

„

-

.I'M* 6. i/ ntmdtd.

iUAHBSK OfPOMMAnOM

>

-> * /•-

r>£

/ 6:

...

ratm

^

/ '"'-•'V C v

TO

J

^f

Li^

• -

> ^^»IWM r;pninr;irAi SIIUVFY COPY

V^3S7T*i OEFDi Cco»»Ul5<Or

^D«.4.

l[JC*bU tool *l 1 R.*»T». TQDrlvn

6. LSI

3f~]T».t W.U 6f~J

T. CASL23P1W.

?hr«ad^d py I v.ld*« [

T* IB. to -J £•* ft. «>pl

IB. to ft. d.vt

IB. to ft. dnt

9. SCKBI __ Or o

tn»- f> *". , • i 'ri '^2. t:-Zt d /

Slot/G.UM • O 1 -J

S.t fe»t».«« — ' »" ft. Md (" O (t.

' ^" rt.l^ x^/ ft. 1A1WAOV Ll BBO««iBad surf^tc.

' - . - - . fl- BfUr / hn. P«B>!

107381

Hr5«t. of Co^l.tlOB

»3 - 3 - -/^• ioQo>«

;

0——lalOTT: tbo»i/3«lo»

A w.idt ' *»'• ' / ib../rt.

A

A Orl<* SOO.T In I*X

p«t bol.

MB. -2 ''

— UncU 7FITTIteSi

"^ " *C '/ '*

DBW M.B..K4 -?• S -"/4

/ ':-•

ft. .ft«r dr.. pwvlBB •.•.•.

Ll. WILL JUAD COVUTIOli

D^th: fro* rt. to

From ft. to

. _fek« t u- ^

Cu. Tte.

ft.

f».

L3. li.*r«.t .our«« of pOB.ibla eoatwUaatla* -

f*>« . dlranlo* tn>

Moll dl.ur*ete« UVOB ecBwl*Ua»r T^"gJ" laQ

Ik. PUT . . . ._

D»>* U.ULU4

la «-- «_ . -

ItodBl I«BWr «F Tolu

. L«utk of dn» »M ft. >

HBtoTlBl Of dm BlB.

Tn»' ir~la«BM»r»ltl» 3Q<<-<- TurttH

(•••aitr - x.p'**

*niK. VAICT wru. comucfoii's comrtcATiai ^

T>il. nil vu driU.d. «id*r By Jurl.tictloi fat tti. nport 1« tr» «•

U< Vt»t of *r kBO»Ud«» "id Inlt.f .

.J ^"•••™"' J ' ' "J*' _

.!„„ • , - • ' (ff-^"""

. ^f

,«n-;,— ,' n-m-r

MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY · 2016-06-12 · feasibility study report alternative water...

Documents

Transcript of MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY · 2016-06-12 · feasibility study report alternative water...