Mini project 2-- teaching and learning theories spring 2015
-
Upload
jistudents -
Category
Education
-
view
98.763 -
download
1
Transcript of Mini project 2-- teaching and learning theories spring 2015
Theories of
Teaching and
Learning
Teresa MerrittEDLE 5010
January 2015
1) Please make sure to install the fonts in your PC(Instructions and fonts are in my shared folder)
2) Set presentation on slideshow mode3) Press enter to proceed to the next slide
Behavioral perspectiveGive me a child and I’ll shape him
into anything.
B.F. SkinnerEmphasized the importance of antecedents
and consequences in changing behavior.
Behavioral perspectiveKnowledge and
LearningFixed body of knowledge to acquire
Knowledge is acquired through:ExplanationDemonstrationGuided Practice
Learning is defined as a change in behavior brought about by experience with virtually no concern for the mental or internal processes of thinking.
Behavioral perspectiveTeaching & role of
teacherTeachersSupervisors
Provide stimulus material and prompting correct response
View errors as not enough conditioning
Behavioral perspectiveStudents & classmates
Receiver of information
Active in practice until behavioral change is permanent
Behavioral perspectiveTeaching approaches
Learning Objectives
Direct Instruction
Good Behavior Game
Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA)
Positive Behavioral Supports (PBS)
Behavioral perspectivePractical classroom application
Contracts
Reinforcement
Consequences
Extinction
Behavior Modification
Modeling, Shaping, & Cueing
Behavioral perspective
Direct instructionSTRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
students work for things that bring them positive feelings
generally avoid behaviors they associate with unpleasantness and develop habitual behaviors from those that are repeated often (Parkay & Hass, 2000)
Help in acquiring procedural knowledge exercised in performance of task
Works best with the knowledge, comprehension, and application level of Bloom’s taxonomy
Lesson objectives include easy to observe behaviors that can be measured accurately; Easy to asses
Found to be effective with at-risk students
Students who receive D.I. tend to do
slightly better on achievement tests
Teacher directed / Teacher centered focus
Limited student choice of activity
Emphasis on Rote Learning and little on understanding and how information relates to stored knowledge
Factual questions and controlled practice in instruction
Students have limited opportunities for self-exploration / experimentation
Limited opportunities for application to real life situations / problems
Students test slightly worse on tests that require abstract thinking (creativity, problem solving)
Cognitive perspectiveJ. R. Anderson believes that one of the things
that makes us as humans unique is our ability to pick up a brand new competence – whether it’s driving a car or solving math problems. This notion has driven Anderson to spend the past decades researching how the brain works and
creating better ways for students to learn.
Cognitive perspectiveKnowledge and
LearningFixed body of knowledge to acquire
Facts, skills, concepts and strategies occurs through the effective application of strategies
learning involves the transformation of information in the environment into knowledge that is stored in the mind. Learning occurs when new knowledge is acquired or existing knowledge is modified by experience
emphasizes the active mental processing of information
Cognitive perspectiveKnowledge and
LearningPart of the learning process involves organizing the new information as well as becoming capable of more sophisticated thought as new information is built.
In cognitivism, the mind is likened to a computer into which data, or information, is relayed and then processed, and then leads to outcomes, or new knowledge.
Cognitive perspectiveTeaching & role of
teacherTransmission – guiding toward more accurate & complete information
Guide – model effective strategies and correct misconceptions
present information in a way which calls upon students' previously acquired knowledge
help students acquire new knowledge by using techniques which enable them to bring their "attention" to the information presented by stimuli, "encode" the information by attaching it to previously acquired information within the short-term memory, and finally store learned information in and "retrieve" learned information from the long-term memory
Cognitive perspectiveTeaching & role of
teacherHelp students organize information in meaningful chunks
Present information in an organized and clear fashion
Focus on meaning, not memorization
Make sure students have needed declarative knowledge to understand new information
Help students learn to manage their resources, know their own cognitive skills, use them deliberately, and monitor comprehension – become self-regulated (Bruning, Schraw, & Ronning, 1999; Woolfolk, 2013.)
Cognitive perspectiveStudents & classmates
Processor of new information
Control their own learning
Strategy user
Organize new information they receive
Associate new information with material they have already learned (schema)
Work collaboratively & given support to engage in task –oriented dialogue with one another
Cognitive perspectiveStudents & classmates
Engage in complex, meaningful, problem – based activities
Apply knowledge in diverse & authentic contexts, to explain ideas, interpret texts, predict phenomena, & construct arguments based on evidence, rather than focus on the acquisition of predetermined “right answers”
As children grow, they become more capable of sophisticated and complex thoughts
Cognitive perspectiveTeaching approaches
Visual tools – graphs and charts
Underlining or Highlighting
Taking notes
Mnemonics
Dual Coding Theory
Concept Mapping & Advanced Organizers
Cognitive perspectiveSTRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
Organized structure to learning
Learners are active participants in their learning
Suited well for problem solving
Produces consistency; everyone accomplishes tasks the same way
Helps learners learn to think and think to learn
Teacher directed / Teacher centered focus
Because learning is very structured, it may become difficult to adapt to changes in what has already been processed & learned
While schemas help make learning more meaningful, a learner may be at a disadvantage if relevant schemas / pre-requisite knowledge is not available
Discounts the effect / importance of other things that may affect student’s learning (ex. emotions, experiences, free will, etc.)
Tends to measure more quantitative than qualitative learning/ results
Constructivist perspective(Psychological / Individual Constructivism)
Are we forming children who are only capable of learning what is already known?
Or should we try to develop creative and innovative minds , capable of discovery from the from the preschool age on, throughout life?
Jean Piaget
Constructivist perspective(Social Constructivism)
What a child can do today with assistance, she will be able to do by herself tomorrow.
Lev Vygotsky
Constructivist perspective
Central ideas:1. Learners are active in constructing own knowledge
2. Social interactions are important in knowledge construction process (Bruning, Schraw, & Norby, 2011)
Constructivist perspective
(Psychological / Individual Constructivism)
(Social Constructivism)
Knowledge and Learning
Changing body of knowledge, individually constructed in the social world – but some understandings clearly superior to others
Active construction & reconstruction of prior knowledge
Occurs through multiple opportunities to connect with what is already known
Socially constructed knowledge; knowledge reflects the outside world as filtered through & influenced by culture, language, beliefs, & interactions with others
Collaborative construction of socially defined knowledge & values
Occurs through socially constructed opportunities
Both external and internal factors direct knowledge formation
Internal processes directs knowledge formation
Main goal of education should be to help children learn how to learn, and that education should “form not furnish” the
minds of students (Piaget, 1969)
Constructivist perspective
(Psychological / Individual Constructivism)
(Social Constructivism)
Teaching & role of teacher
Challenging & guiding students toward a more complete understanding
Facilitator – listen to student’s ideas & thinking and provide direction
Teacher & student co-constructing knowledge
Guide, facilitator, & partner – listen to socially constructed knowledge & help co-construct knowledge
Modeling, Coaching, and assistance with scaffolding
Constructivist perspective
Other s are part of the process of knowledge construction
Active co-constructor of knowledge; active social participant
students(Psychological / Individual
Constructivism)(Social Constructivism)
Stimulate questions & raise questions
Active constructor of knowledge; active thinker and interpreter
Constructivist perspective
(Psychological / Individual Constructivism)
(Social Constructivism)
Teaching approaches
Conceptual change teaching
Pure discovery learning
Cognitive apprenticeship
Reciprocal teaching
Cooperative Learning (Jigsaw, scripted cooperation, )
Scaffolding – teachers and students create meaningful connections between teachers’ cultural knowledge and the everyday experience & knowledge of the student.
Authentic Tasks – activities and kinds of situations that studentswill face as they apply what they are learning to real – world problems (Brown, 1990; Needels & Knapp, 1994)
Problem – Based Learning
Constructivist perspectiveSTRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
Student focused /centered
Learners are active participants in their learning
Suited well for problem solving
Activities are interactive; places emphasis on sensory input
Increase relevancy
More tolerant of different cultures and encourages diversity rather than other theories
Student focused /centered
Lack of structure
Constructivism calls for the teacher to discard standardized curriculum in favor of a more personalized course of study based on what the student already knows
Removes grading in the traditional way & instead places more value on students evaluating their own progress
May lead students to be confused & frustrated because they may not have the ability to form relationships & abstracts between the knowledge they already have & the knowledge they are learning for themselves
All students must be able to think critically & creatively & solve problems
Balanced approach to teaching….
Teresa MerrittEDLE 5010
January 2015
1. Consider the subject matter / goal for instruction
2. Consider teacher’s level of expertise and comfort level in using chosen strategy
3. Consider students’ learning styles
4. Consider students’ ability / skill level
5. Consider size of class
6. Use a combination of strategies and possibly determine a dominant mode / strategy for instruction
http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/students/jhaberkorn/edpsy399ol/l11q4.html
http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/index.php?title=Behaviorism
http://peoplelearn.homestead.com/beduc/chapter_5.pdf
http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_197910_peterson.pdf
http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/14255_Chapter4.pdf
http://www.education.com/reference/article/comparison-directed-constructivist/
http://www.brighthubeducation.com/teaching-methods-tips/76645-pros-and-cons-of-constructivist-learning-theory/
http://teachinglearningresources.pbworks.com/w/page/31012664/Cognitivism
https://techforinstructionandassessment.wikispaces.com/Cognitivism
http://ci484-learning-technologies.wikispaces.com/Behaviorism,+Cognitivism,+Constructivism+%26+Connectivism
http://www.csun.edu/~sk287035/coursework/646/assignments/literature/A%20Motivational%20View%20of%20Constructivistinformed%20Teaching%20.pdf